{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,20]],"date-time":"2026-07-20T16:34:10Z","timestamp":1784565250249,"version":"3.55.0"},"reference-count":30,"publisher":"Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG)","issue":"5","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["SPI"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,5]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n<jats:title>OBJECTIVE<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>Pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) is a powerful but high-risk surgical technique for destabilizing the spine for deformity correction in both the sagittal and coronal planes. Numerous reports have demonstrated the benefits of this technique for realigning the spine in a physiological posture; however, the open surgical technique is associated with a high complication rate. In this report the authors review data obtained in a series of patients who underwent PSO through a less invasive approach.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>\n<jats:sec>\n<jats:title>METHODS<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>Sixteen patients with severe coronal- and\/or sagittal-plane deformities were treated in this series. Conservative measures had failed in all cases and patients had undergone a single-level PSO or extended PSO at L-2 or L-3. Fixation was accomplished using percutaneous instrumentation and interbody or facet joint fusions were used at the remaining levels. None of the procedures were aborted or converted to a traditional open procedure. Standard clinical and radiographic measures were used to assess patient outcomes.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>\n<jats:sec>\n<jats:title>RESULTS<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>Mean age was 68.8 years and mean follow-up duration was 17.7 months. An average of 7.6 levels were fused, and 50% of the patients had bilateral iliac screw fixation, with all constructs crossing both the thoracolumbar and lumbosacral junctions. Operative time averaged 356 \u00b1 50 minutes and there was a mean blood loss of 843 \u00b1 339 ml.<\/jats:p>\n<jats:p>The leg visual analog scale score improved from a mean of 5.7 \u00b1 2.7 to one of 1.3 \u00b1 1.6, and the back visual analog scale score improved from a mean of 8.6 \u00b1 1.3 to one of 2.4 \u00b1 2.1. The Oswestry Disability Index score improved from a mean of 50.1 \u00b1 14.4 to 16.4 \u00b1 12.7, representing a mean reduction of 36.0 \u00b1 16.9 points. The SF-36 physical component summary score changed from a mean of 43.4 \u00b1 2.6 to one of 47.0 \u00b1 4.3, and the SF-36 mental component summary score changed from a mean of 46.7 \u00b1 3.6 to 46.30 \u00b1 3.0.<\/jats:p>\n<jats:p>Coronal alignment improved from a mean of 27.9 \u00b1 43.6 mm to 16.0 \u00b1 17.2 mm. The lumbar Cobb angle improved from a mean of 41.2\u00b0 \u00b1 18.4\u00b0 to 15.4\u00b0 \u00b1 9.6\u00b0, and lumbar lordosis improved from 23.1\u00b0 \u00b1 15.9\u00b0 to 48.6\u00b0 \u00b1 11.7\u00b0. Pelvic tilt improved from a mean of 33.7\u00b0 \u00b1 8.6\u00b0 to 24.4\u00b0 \u00b1 6.5\u00b0, and the sagittal vertical axis improved from 102.4 \u00b1 73.4 mm to 42.2 \u00b1 39.9 mm. The final lumbar lordosis\u2013pelvic incidence difference averaged 8.4\u00b0 \u00b1 12.1\u00b0. There were 4 patients who failed to achieve less than or equal to a 10\u00b0 mismatch on this parameter. Ten of the 16 patients underwent delayed postoperative CT, and 8 of these had developed a solid arthrodesis at all levels treated. A total of 6 complications occurred in this series. There were no cases of symptomatic proximal junction kyphosis.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>\n<jats:sec>\n<jats:title>CONCLUSIONS<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>Advancements in minimally invasive technique have resulted in the ability to manage increasingly complex deformities with hybrid approaches. In this limited series, the authors describe the results of utilizing a tissue-sparing mini-open PSO to correct severe spinal deformities. This method was technically feasible in all cases with acceptable radiographic outcomes similar to open surgery. However, high complication rates associated with these deformity corrections remain problematic.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.3171\/2015.7.spine15188","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2016,1,8]],"date-time":"2016-01-08T15:02:59Z","timestamp":1452265379000},"page":"769-776","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":46,"title":["Mini-open pedicle subtraction osteotomy as a treatment for severe adult spinal deformities: case series with initial clinical and radiographic outcomes"],"prefix":"10.3171","volume":"24","author":[{"given":"Michael Y.","family":"Wang","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida; and"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Gerd","family":"Bordon","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital Manises, Valencia, Spain"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1754","reference":[{"key":"b1-spine15188","series-title":"J Neurosurg Spine","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"92","DOI":"10.3171\/2011.3.SPINE10425","article-title":"Changes in coronal and sagittal plane alignment following minimally invasive direct lateral interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar disease in adults: a radiographic study","volume":"15","author":"Acosta","year":"2011"},{"issue":"3","key":"b2-spine15188","series-title":"Neurosurg Focus","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E6","DOI":"10.3171\/2010.1.FOCUS09272","article-title":"Mid-term to long-term clinical and functional outcomes of minimally invasive correction and fusion for adults with scoliosis","volume":"28","author":"Anand","year":"2010"},{"issue":"Suppl 3","key":"b3-spine15188","series-title":"Surg Neurol Int","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S198","DOI":"10.4103\/2152-7806.98583","article-title":"The lateral transpsoas approach to the lumbar and thoracic spine: A review","volume":"3","author":"Arnold","year":"2012"},{"key":"b4-spine15188","series-title":"J Neurosurg Spine","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"794","DOI":"10.3171\/2014.7.SPINE131146","article-title":"First report of major vascular injury due to lateral transpsoas approach leading to fatality","volume":"21","author":"Assina","year":"2014"},{"key":"b5-spine15188","series-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am","first-page":"454","article-title":"Pedicle subtraction osteotomy for the treatment of fixed sagittal imbalance","volume":"85-A","author":"Bridwell","year":"2003"},{"key":"b6-spine15188","series-title":"J Neurosurg Spine","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"640","DOI":"10.3171\/2014.5.SPINE121146","article-title":"Results of the AANS membership survey of adult spinal deformity knowledge: impact of training, practice experience, and assessment of potential areas for improved education: Clinical article","volume":"21","author":"Clark","year":"2014"},{"issue":"Suppl 6","key":"b7-spine15188","series-title":"Eur Spine J","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"699","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-014-3561-y","article-title":"The role of minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion in sagittal balance correction and spinal deformity","volume":"23","author":"Costanzo","year":"2014"},{"issue":"3","key":"b8-spine15188","series-title":"Neurosurg Focus","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E8","DOI":"10.3171\/2010.1.FOCUS09282","article-title":"Early outcomes and safety of the minimally invasive, lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas approach for adult degenerative scoliosis","volume":"28","author":"Dakwar","year":"2010"},{"key":"b9-spine15188","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1190","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000000380","article-title":"Risk factors for and assessment of symptomatic pseudarthrosis after lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy in adult spinal deformity","volume":"39","author":"Dickson","year":"2014"},{"issue":"5","key":"b10-spine15188","series-title":"Neurosurg Focus","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E13","DOI":"10.3171\/2014.3.FOCUS1424","article-title":"Comparison of radiographic results after minimally invasive, hybrid, and open surgery for adult spinal deformity: a multicenter study of 184 patients","volume":"36","author":"Haque","year":"2014"},{"key":"b11-spine15188","series-title":"J Neurosurg Spine","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.3171\/spi.2006.5.1.1","article-title":"Pedicle subtraction osteotomy in the treatment of chronic, posttraumatic kyphotic deformity","volume":"5","author":"Heary","year":"2006"},{"issue":"2","key":"b12-spine15188","series-title":"Neurosurg Focus","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E19","DOI":"10.3171\/FOC\/2008\/25\/8\/E19","article-title":"Maximizing the potential of minimally invasive spine surgery in complex spinal disorders","volume":"25","author":"Hsieh","year":"2008"},{"key":"b13-spine15188","series-title":"J Clin Neurosci","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"576","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jocn.2012.05.032","article-title":"Pelvic parameters of sagittal balance in extreme lateral interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar disc disease","volume":"20","author":"Johnson","year":"2013"},{"key":"b14-spine15188","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2189","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e31814b8371","article-title":"Results of lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomies for fixed sagittal imbalance: a minimum 5-year follow-up study","volume":"32","author":"Kim","year":"2007"},{"key":"b15-spine15188","series-title":"Int Orthop","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"87","DOI":"10.1007\/s00264-014-2516-6","article-title":"Evidence showing the relationship between sagittal balance and clinical outcomes in surgical treatment of degenerative spinal diseases: a literature review","volume":"39","author":"Le Huec","year":"2015"},{"key":"b16-spine15188","series-title":"J Neurosurg Spine","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"512","DOI":"10.3171\/2013.10.SPINE13793","article-title":"Editorial. Sagittal balance","volume":"20","author":"Lenke","year":"2014"},{"issue":"Suppl 6","key":"b17-spine15188","series-title":"Eur Spine J","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"610","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-014-3555-9","article-title":"Revision surgery after PSO failure with rod breakage: a comparison of different techniques","volume":"23","author":"Luca","year":"2014"},{"key":"b18-spine15188","series-title":"J Neurosurg Spine","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"515","DOI":"10.3171\/2014.2.SPINE1347","article-title":"Management of sagittal balance in adult spinal deformity with minimally invasive anterolateral lumbar interbody fusion: a preliminary radiographic study","volume":"20","author":"Manwaring","year":"2014"},{"issue":"3 Suppl","key":"b19-spine15188","series-title":"Neurosurgery","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"171","DOI":"10.1227\/01.NEU.0000325680.32776.82","article-title":"Pedicle subtraction osteotomy","volume":"63","author":"Mummaneni","year":"2008"},{"key":"b20-spine15188","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E973","DOI":"10.1097\/01.brs.0000247950.02886.e5","article-title":"Mathematical calculation of pedicle subtraction osteotomy size to allow precision correction of fixed sagittal deformity","volume":"31","author":"Ondra","year":"2006"},{"key":"b21-spine15188","series-title":"J Neurosurg Spine","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"306","DOI":"10.3171\/2013.12.SPINE13680","article-title":"Impact of age on the likelihood of reaching a minimum clinically important difference in 374 three-column spinal osteotomies: clinical article","volume":"20","author":"Scheer","year":"2014"},{"issue":"Suppl","key":"b22-spine15188","series-title":"J Spinal Disord Tech","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S1","DOI":"10.1097\/01.bsd.0000132291.50455.d0","article-title":"Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF): technical feasibility and initial results","volume":"18","author":"Schwender","year":"2005"},{"key":"b23-spine15188","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"817","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3181e21783","article-title":"Risk-benefit assessment of surgery for adult scoliosis: an analysis based on patient age","volume":"36","author":"Smith","year":"2011"},{"issue":"3","key":"b24-spine15188","series-title":"Neurosurg Focus","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E7","DOI":"10.3171\/2010.1.FOCUS09263","article-title":"Complications and radiographic correction in adult scoliosis following combined transpsoas extreme lateral interbody fusion and posterior pedicle screw instrumentation","volume":"28","author":"Tormenti","year":"2010"},{"key":"b25-spine15188","series-title":"Spine J","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"195","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2005.04.008","article-title":"A pedicle subtraction osteotomy as an adjunctive tool in the surgical treatment of a rigid thoracolumbar hyperkyphosis; a preliminary report","volume":"6","author":"van Loon","year":"2006"},{"key":"b26-spine15188","series-title":"Neurosurgery","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"A204","DOI":"10.1227\/01.NEU.0000320430.37577.B7","article-title":"Minimally invasive posterior osteotomies","volume":"63","author":"Voyadzis","year":"2008"},{"key":"b27-spine15188","series-title":"Neurosurgery","first-page":"ONS140","article-title":"Lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy","volume":"60","author":"Wang","year":"2007"},{"key":"b28-spine15188","series-title":"World Neurosurg","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"843.e11","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2012.10.002","article-title":"Mini-open pedicle subtraction osteotomy: surgical technique","volume":"81","author":"Wang","year":"2014"},{"issue":"3","key":"b29-spine15188","series-title":"Neurosurg Focus","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E9","DOI":"10.3171\/2010.1.FOCUS09286","article-title":"Minimally invasive surgery for thoracolumbar spinal deformity: initial clinical experience with clinical and radiographic outcomes","volume":"28","author":"Wang","year":"2010"},{"issue":"3","key":"b30-spine15188","series-title":"Neurosurg Focus","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E3","DOI":"10.3171\/2009.12.FOCUS09254","article-title":"Adult scoliosis surgery outcomes: a systematic review","volume":"28","author":"Yadla","year":"2010"}],"container-title":["Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/thejns.org\/view\/journals\/j-neurosurg-spine\/24\/5\/article-p769.xml","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/thejns.org\/downloadpdf\/journals\/j-neurosurg-spine\/24\/5\/article-p769.xml","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"syndication"},{"URL":"https:\/\/thejns.org\/downloadpdf\/journals\/j-neurosurg-spine\/24\/5\/article-p769.xml","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,4,15]],"date-time":"2023-04-15T21:57:50Z","timestamp":1681595870000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/thejns.org\/view\/journals\/j-neurosurg-spine\/24\/5\/article-p769.xml"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2016,5]]},"references-count":30,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5"},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3171\/2015.7.spine15188","relation":{},"ISSN":["1547-5654"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1547-5654","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2016,5]]}}}