{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,18]],"date-time":"2026-08-18T04:02:25Z","timestamp":1787025745195,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":28,"publisher":"Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG)","issue":"4","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["JNS"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,10]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>OBJECTIVE<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Warning criteria for monitoring of motor evoked potentials (MEP) after direct cortical stimulation during surgery for supratentorial tumors have been well described. However, little is known about the value of MEP after transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) in predicting postoperative motor deficit when monitoring threshold level. The authors aimed to evaluate the feasibility and value of this method in glioma surgery by using a new approach for interpreting changes in threshold level involving contra- and ipsilateral MEP.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>METHODS<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Between November 2013 and December 2014, 93 patients underwent TES-MEP monitoring during resection of gliomas located close to central motor pathways but not involving the primary motor cortex. The MEP were elicited by transcranial repetitive anodal train stimulation. Bilateral MEP were continuously evaluated to assess percentage increase of threshold level (minimum voltage needed to evoke a stable motor response from each of the muscles being monitored) from the baseline set before dural opening. An increase in threshold level on the contralateral side (facial, arm, or leg muscles contralateral to the affected hemisphere) of more than 20% beyond the percentage increase on the ipsilateral side (facial, arm, or leg muscles ipsilateral to the affected hemisphere) was considered a significant alteration. Recorded alterations were subsequently correlated with postoperative neurological deterioration and MRI findings.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>RESULTS<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>TES-MEP could be elicited in all patients, including those with recurrent glioma (31 patients) and preoperative paresis (20 patients). Five of 73 patients without preoperative paresis showed a significant increase in threshold level, and all of them developed new paresis postoperatively (transient in 4 patients and permanent in 1 patient). Eight of 20 patients with preoperative paresis showed a significant increase in threshold level, and all of them developed postoperative neurological deterioration (transient in 4 patients and permanent in 4 patients). In 80 patients no significant change in threshold level was detected, and none of them showed postoperative neurological deterioration. The specificity and sensitivity in this series were estimated at 100%. Postoperative MRI revealed gross-total tumor resection in 56 of 82 patients (68%) in whom complete tumor resection was attainable; territorial ischemia was detected in 4 patients.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>CONCLUSIONS<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The novel threshold criterion has made TES-MEP a useful method for predicting postoperative motor deficit in patients who undergo glioma surgery, and has been feasible in patients with preoperative paresis as well as in patients with recurrent glioma. Including contra- and ipsilateral changes in threshold level has led to a high sensitivity and specificity.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.3171\/2015.8.jns151439","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2016,1,22]],"date-time":"2016-01-22T10:41:41Z","timestamp":1453459301000},"page":"795-802","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":35,"title":["A novel threshold criterion in transcranial motor evoked potentials during surgery for gliomas close to the motor pathway"],"prefix":"10.3171","volume":"125","author":[{"given":"Tammam","family":"Abboud","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Miriam","family":"Schaper","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Lasse","family":"D\u00fchrsen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Cindy","family":"Schwarz","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Nils Ole","family":"Schmidt","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Manfred","family":"Westphal","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Tobias","family":"Martens","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1754","reference":[{"key":"b1-jns151439","series-title":"Stat Sci","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"101","DOI":"10.1214\/ss\/1009213285","article-title":"Interval estimation for a binomial proportion","volume":"16","author":"Brown","year":"2001"},{"issue":"2 Suppl","key":"b2-jns151439","series-title":"J Neurosurg","first-page":"161","article-title":"Threshold-level repetitive transcranial electrical stimulation for intraoperative monitoring of central motor conduction","volume":"95","author":"Calancie","year":"2001"},{"key":"b3-jns151439","series-title":"J Neurosurg","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"457","DOI":"10.3171\/jns.1998.88.3.0457","article-title":"\u201cThreshold-level\u201d multipulse transcranial electrical stimulation of motor cortex for intraoperative monitoring of spinal motor tracts: description of method and comparison to somatosensory evoked potential monitoring","volume":"88","author":"Calancie","year":"1998"},{"key":"b4-jns151439","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"406","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3181642a2f","article-title":"Alarm criteria for motor-evoked potentials: what's wrong with the \u201cpresence-or-absence\u201d approach?","volume":"33","author":"Calancie","year":"2008"},{"key":"b5-jns151439","series-title":"J Clin Neurophysiol","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"129","DOI":"10.1097\/00004691-200304000-00007","article-title":"Does preoperative paresis influence intraoperative monitoring of the motor cortex?","volume":"20","author":"Kombos","year":"2003"},{"key":"b6-jns151439","series-title":"J Clin Neurophysiol","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"422","DOI":"10.1097\/WNP.0b013e3181c2c0dc","article-title":"Impact of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring on surgery of high-grade gliomas","volume":"26","author":"Kombos","year":"2009"},{"key":"b7-jns151439","series-title":"J Neurosurg","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"608","DOI":"10.3171\/jns.2001.95.4.0608","article-title":"Monitoring of intraoperative motor evoked potentials to increase the safety of surgery in and around the motor cortex","volume":"95","author":"Kombos","year":"2001"},{"key":"b8-jns151439","series-title":"Br J Neurosurg","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"48","DOI":"10.1080\/02688690802563349","article-title":"Significance of intraoperative motor function monitoring using transcranial electrical motor evoked potentials (MEP) in patients with spinal and cranial lesions near the motor pathways","volume":"23","author":"Krammer","year":"2009"},{"key":"b9-jns151439","series-title":"J Neurosurg","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1269","DOI":"10.3171\/2013.2.JNS121752","article-title":"Reliability of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring using motor evoked potentials during resection of metastases in motor-eloquent brain regions: clinical article","volume":"118","author":"Krieg","year":"2013"},{"key":"b10-jns151439","series-title":"Neurosurgery","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1060","DOI":"10.1227\/NEU.0b013e31823f5ade","article-title":"Predictive value and safety of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring with motor evoked potentials in glioma surgery","volume":"70","author":"Krieg","year":"2012"},{"key":"b11-jns151439","series-title":"J Korean Neurosurg Soc","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"98","DOI":"10.3340\/jkns.2014.56.2.98","article-title":"Intraoperative monitoring of motor-evoked potentials for supratentorial tumor surgery","volume":"56","author":"Lee","year":"2014"},{"key":"b12-jns151439","series-title":"J Neurosurg Anesthesiol","first-page":"13","article-title":"Progressive suppression of motor evoked potentials during general anesthesia: the phenomenon of \u201canesthetic fade\u201d","volume":"17","author":"Lyon","year":"2005"},{"key":"b13-jns151439","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"194","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-200301150-00018","article-title":"Monitoring scoliosis surgery with combined multiple pulse transcranial electric motor and cortical somatosensory-evoked potentials from the lower and upper extremities","volume":"28","author":"MacDonald","year":"2003"},{"key":"b14-jns151439","series-title":"Acta Neurochir (Wien)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2293","DOI":"10.1007\/s00701-013-1868-9","article-title":"A practical grading system of ultrasonographic visibility for intracerebral lesions","volume":"155","author":"Mair","year":"2013"},{"key":"b15-jns151439","series-title":"J Neurosurg","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"156","DOI":"10.3171\/2008.4.17536","article-title":"Independent association of extent of resection with survival in patients with malignant brain astrocytoma","volume":"110","author":"McGirt","year":"2009"},{"key":"b16-jns151439","series-title":"J Neurosurg","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"582","DOI":"10.3171\/jns.2007.106.4.582","article-title":"Motor tract monitoring during insular glioma surgery","volume":"106","author":"Neuloh","year":"2007"},{"key":"b17-jns151439","series-title":"Adv Tech Stand Neurosurg","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"171","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-7091-0558-0_5","article-title":"Motor evoked potential monitoring for the surgery of brain tumours and vascular malformations","volume":"29","author":"Neuloh","year":"2004"},{"key":"b18-jns151439","series-title":"Neurophysiol Clin","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"383","DOI":"10.1016\/j.neucli.2007.09.002","article-title":"Stroke prevention during surgery for deep-seated gliomas","volume":"37","author":"Neuloh","year":"2007"},{"key":"b19-jns151439","series-title":"Clin Neurophysiol","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1271","DOI":"10.1016\/j.clinph.2014.10.005","article-title":"Variability in amplitude and stimulation threshold values in motor evoked potential (MEP) monitoring during the resection of brain lesions","volume":"126","author":"Okamoto","year":"2015"},{"key":"b20-jns151439","series-title":"Clin Neurol Neurosurg","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"64","DOI":"10.1016\/j.clineuro.2015.02.004","article-title":"The value of intraoperative sonography in low grade glioma surgery","volume":"131","author":"Petridis","year":"2015"},{"key":"b21-jns151439","series-title":"J Clin Neurophysiol","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"151","DOI":"10.1097\/WNP.0b013e31824f8566","article-title":"Intraoperative neuromonitoring during glioma surgery: bring in the expert neurophysiologists!","volume":"29","author":"Ritzl","year":"2012"},{"key":"b22-jns151439","series-title":"Rev Neurol (Paris)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"648","DOI":"10.1016\/j.neurol.2011.07.004","article-title":"Extent of resection influences outcomes for patients with gliomas","volume":"167","author":"Sanai","year":"2011"},{"key":"b23-jns151439","series-title":"Lancet Oncol","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"997","DOI":"10.1016\/S1470-2045(11)70196-6","article-title":"Intraoperative MRI guidance and extent of resection in glioma surgery: a randomised, controlled trial","volume":"12","author":"Senft","year":"2011"},{"key":"b24-jns151439","series-title":"Neurosurgery","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"678","DOI":"10.1227\/00006123-199604000-00008","article-title":"Functional cortex and subcortical white matter located within gliomas","volume":"38","author":"Skirboll","year":"1996"},{"key":"b25-jns151439","series-title":"Lancet Oncol","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"392","DOI":"10.1016\/S1470-2045(06)70665-9","article-title":"Fluorescence-guided surgery with 5-aminolevulinic acid for resection of malignant glioma: a randomised controlled multicentre phase III trial","volume":"7","author":"Stummer","year":"2006"},{"key":"b26-jns151439","series-title":"Neurosurgery","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"302","DOI":"10.1227\/01.NEU.0000371973.46234.46","article-title":"Intraoperative motor evoked potential alteration in intra-cranial tumor surgery and its relation to signal alteration in postoperative magnetic resonance imaging","volume":"67","author":"Szel\u00e9nyi","year":"2010"},{"key":"b27-jns151439","series-title":"J Neurooncol","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"417","DOI":"10.1007\/s11060-010-0193-x","article-title":"Surgical treatment of high-grade gliomas in motor areas. The impact of different supportive technologies: a 171-patient series","volume":"100","author":"Talacchi","year":"2010"},{"key":"b28-jns151439","series-title":"Neurosurgery","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"935","DOI":"10.1227\/01.neu.0000303189.80049.ab","article-title":"Clinical evaluation and follow-up outcome of diffusion tensor imaging-based functional neuronavigation: a prospective, controlled study in patients with gliomas involving pyramidal tracts","volume":"61","author":"Wu","year":"2007"}],"container-title":["Journal of Neurosurgery"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/thejns.org\/view\/journals\/j-neurosurg\/125\/4\/article-p795.xml","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/thejns.org\/downloadpdf\/journals\/j-neurosurg\/125\/4\/article-p795.xml","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"syndication"},{"URL":"https:\/\/thejns.org\/downloadpdf\/journals\/j-neurosurg\/125\/4\/article-p795.xml","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,4,29]],"date-time":"2023-04-29T19:55:16Z","timestamp":1682798116000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/thejns.org\/view\/journals\/j-neurosurg\/125\/4\/article-p795.xml"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2016,10]]},"references-count":28,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4"},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3171\/2015.8.jns151439","relation":{},"ISSN":["0022-3085","1933-0693"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0022-3085","type":"print"},{"value":"1933-0693","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2016,10]]}}}