{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,7]],"date-time":"2026-10-07T06:09:52Z","timestamp":1791353392357,"version":"4.3.1"},"reference-count":21,"publisher":"Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG)","issue":"4","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,10]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec><jats:title>OBJECTIVE<\/jats:title><jats:p>Adverse events related to spine surgery sometimes lead to litigation. Few studies have evaluated the association between spine surgical complications and medical malpractice proceedings, outcomes, and awards. The aim of this study was to identify the most frequent causes of alleged malpractice in spine surgery and to gain insight into patient demographic and clinical characteristics associated with medical negligence litigation.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>METHODS<\/jats:title><jats:p>A search for \u201cspine surgery\u201d spanning February 1988 to May 2015 was conducted utilizing the medicolegal research service VerdictSearch (ALM Media Properties, LLC). Demographic data for the plaintiff and defendant in addition to clinical data for the procedure and legal outcomes were examined. Spinal cord injury, anoxic\/hypoxic brain injury, and death were classified as catastrophic complications; all other complications were classified as noncatastrophic. Both chi-square and t-tests were used to evaluate the effect of these variables on case outcomes and awards granted.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>RESULTS<\/jats:title><jats:p>A total of 569 legal cases were examined; 335 cases were excluded due to irrelevance or insufficient information. Of the 234 cases included in this investigation, 54.2% (127 cases) resulted in a defendant ruling, 26.1% (61) in a plaintiff ruling, and 19.6% (46) in a settlement. The awards granted for plaintiff rulings ranged from $134,000 to $38,323,196 (mean $4,045,205 \u00b1 $6,804,647). Awards for settlements ranged from $125,000 to $9,000,000 (mean $1,930,278 \u00b1 $2,113,593), which was significantly less than plaintiff rulings (p = 0.022). Compared with cases without a delay in diagnosis of the complication, the cases with a diagnostic delay were more likely to result in a plaintiff verdict or settlement (42.9% vs 72.7%, p = 0.007) than a defense verdict, and were more likely to settle out of court (17.5% vs 40.9%, p = 0.008). Similarly, compared with cases without a delay in treatment of the complication, those with a therapeutic delay were more likely to result in a plaintiff verdict or settlement (43.7% vs 68.4%, p = 0.03) than a defense verdict, and were more likely to settle out of court (18.1% vs 36.8%, p = 0.04). Overall, 28% of cases (66\/234) involved catastrophic complications. Physicians were more likely to lose cases (plaintiff verdict or settlement) with catastrophic complications (66.7% vs 37.5%, p &lt; 0.001). In cases with a plaintiff ruling, catastrophic complications resulted in significantly larger mean awards than noncatastrophic complications ($6.1M vs $2.9M, p = 0.04). The medical specialty of the provider and the age or sex of the patient were not associated with the case outcome or award granted (p &gt; 0.05). The average time to a decision for defendant verdicts was 5.1 years; for plaintiff rulings, 5.0 years; and for settlements, 3.4 years.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>CONCLUSIONS<\/jats:title><jats:p>Delays in the diagnosis and the treatment of a surgical complication predict legal case outcomes favoring the plaintiff. Catastrophic complications are linked to large sums awarded to the plaintiff and are predictive of rulings against the physician. For physician defendants, the costs of settlements are significantly less than those of losing in court. Although this study provides potentially valuable data from a large series of postoperative litigation cases, it may not provide a true representation of all jurisdictions, each of which has variable malpractice laws and medicolegal environments.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.3171\/2016.11.spine16646","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2017,7,21]],"date-time":"2017-07-21T14:02:24Z","timestamp":1500645744000},"page":"470-475","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":67,"title":["Malpractice litigation following spine surgery"],"prefix":"10.3171","volume":"27","author":[{"given":"Alan H.","family":"Daniels","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island"},{"name":"Division of Spine Surgery,"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Roy","family":"Ruttiman","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island"},{"name":"Alpert Medical School of"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Adam E. M.","family":"Eltorai","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island"},{"name":"Alpert Medical School of"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"J. Mason","family":"DePasse","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island"},{"name":"Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, and"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Bielinsky A.","family":"Brea","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Mark A.","family":"Palumbo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island"},{"name":"Division of Spine Surgery,"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1754","reference":[{"key":"b1","series-title":"Orthopedics","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e414","DOI":"10.3928\/01477447-20120222-15","article-title":"Review of medicolegal cases for cauda equina syndrome: what factors lead to an adverse outcome for the provider?","volume":"35","author":"Daniels EW","year":"2012","unstructured":"Daniels EW, Gordon Z, French K, Ahn UM, Ahn NU: Review of medicolegal cases for cauda equina syndrome: what factors lead to an adverse outcome for the provider? Orthopedics 35:e414\u2013e419, 201210.3928\/01477447-20120222-15"},{"key":"b2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.K.01272","article-title":"Medical Malpractice: Theory, Evidence, and Public Policy","author":"Danzon PM","year":"1985","unstructured":"Danzon PM: Medical Malpractice: Theory, Evidence, and Public Policy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 198510.2106\/JBJS.K.01272"},{"key":"b3","series-title":"Health Aff (Millwood)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"802","DOI":"10.1377\/hlthaff.24.3.802","article-title":"Effects of the malpractice crisis on access to and incidence of high-risk procedures: evidence from Florida","volume":"24","author":"Dranove D","year":"2005","unstructured":"Dranove D, Gron A: Effects of the malpractice crisis on access to and incidence of high-risk procedures: evidence from Florida. Health Aff (Millwood) 24:802\u2013810, 20051588617510.1377\/hlthaff.24.3.802"},{"key":"b4","series-title":"J Neurosurg","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"185","DOI":"10.3171\/2013.8.JNS13584","article-title":"Comparison of plaintiff and defendant expert witness qualification in malpractice litigation in neurological surgery","volume":"120","author":"Eloy JA","year":"2014","unstructured":"Eloy JA, Svider PF, Folbe AJ, Couldwell WT, Liu JK: Comparison of plaintiff and defendant expert witness qualification in malpractice litigation in neurological surgery. J Neurosurg 120:185\u2013190, 201410.3171\/2013.8.JNS1358424074492"},{"key":"b5","series-title":"World Neurosurg","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"218","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2013.01.029","article-title":"Is the medicolegal issue avoidable in neurosurgery? A retrospective survey of a series of 115 medicolegal cases from public hospitals","volume":"81","author":"Emery E","year":"2014","unstructured":"Emery E, Balossier A, Mertens P: Is the medicolegal issue avoidable in neurosurgery? A retrospective survey of a series of 115 medicolegal cases from public hospitals. World Neurosurg 81:218\u2013222, 20142331402710.1016\/j.wneu.2013.01.029"},{"key":"b6","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2425","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-200211150-00002","article-title":"It is easier to confuse a jury than convince a judge: the crisis in medical malpractice","volume":"27","author":"Epstein NE","year":"2002","unstructured":"Epstein NE: It is easier to confuse a jury than convince a judge: the crisis in medical malpractice. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 27:2425\u20132430, 20021243596910.1097\/00007632-200211150-00002"},{"key":"b7","series-title":"Surg Neurol Int","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.4103\/2152-7806.62261","article-title":"A medico-legal review of cases involving quadriplegia following cervical spine surgery: Is there an argument for a no-fault compensation system?","volume":"1","author":"Epstein NE","year":"2010","unstructured":"Epstein NE: A medico-legal review of cases involving quadriplegia following cervical spine surgery: Is there an argument for a no-fault compensation system? Surg Neurol Int 1:3, 201010.4103\/2152-7806.6226120657685"},{"key":"b8","series-title":"J Spinal Disord Tech","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"15","DOI":"10.1097\/BSD.0b013e3181c752ab","article-title":"A review of medicolegal malpractice suits involving cervical spine: what can we learn or change?","volume":"24","author":"Epstein NE","year":"2011","unstructured":"Epstein NE: A review of medicolegal malpractice suits involving cervical spine: what can we learn or change? J Spinal Disord Tech 24:15\u201319, 201110.1097\/BSD.0b013e3181c752ab20087227"},{"key":"b9","series-title":"Surg Neurol","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"416","DOI":"10.1016\/j.surneu.2005.09.026","article-title":"Malpractice issues in neurological surgery","volume":"65","author":"Fager CA","year":"2006","unstructured":"Fager CA: Malpractice issues in neurological surgery. Surg Neurol 65:416\u2013421, 200610.1016\/j.surneu.2005.09.02616531218"},{"key":"b10","series-title":"World Neurosurg","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"585","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2012.03.017","article-title":"A survey-based study of wrong-level lumbar spine surgery: the scope of the problem and current practices in place to help avoid these errors","volume":"79","author":"Groff MW","year":"2013","unstructured":"Groff MW, Heller JE, Potts EA, Mummaneni PV, Shaffrey CI, Smith JS: A survey-based study of wrong-level lumbar spine surgery: the scope of the problem and current practices in place to help avoid these errors. World Neurosurg 79:585\u2013592, 201310.1016\/j.wneu.2012.03.01722480979"},{"key":"b11","series-title":"N Engl J Med","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"629","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMsa1012370","article-title":"Malpractice risk according to physician specialty","volume":"365","author":"Jena AB","year":"2011","unstructured":"Jena AB, Seabury S, Lakdawalla D, Chandra A: Malpractice risk according to physician specialty. N Engl J Med 365:629\u2013636, 20112184846310.1056\/NEJMsa1012370"},{"key":"b12","series-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am","first-page":"e201","article-title":"Lessons regarding the safety of orthopaedic patient care: an analysis of four hundred and sixty-four closed malpractice claims","volume":"95","author":"Matsen FA III","year":"2013","unstructured":"Matsen FA III, Stephens L, Jette JL, Warme WJ, Posner KL: Lessons regarding the safety of orthopaedic patient care: an analysis of four hundred and sixty-four closed malpractice claims. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95:e201\u2013e208, 2013"},{"key":"b13","series-title":"Ann Surg","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"621","DOI":"10.1097\/01.sla.0000182957.54783.9a","article-title":"Effects of a malpractice crisis on specialist supply and patient access to care","volume":"242","author":"Mello MM","year":"2005","unstructured":"Mello MM, Studdert DM, DesRoches CM, Peugh J, Zapert K, Brennan TA, : Effects of a malpractice crisis on specialist supply and patient access to care. Ann Surg 242:621\u2013628, 200510.1097\/01.sla.0000182957.54783.9a16244532"},{"key":"b14","series-title":"Ann R Coll Surg Engl","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"266","DOI":"10.1308\/003588414X13814021679834","article-title":"A nine-year review of medicolegal claims in neurosurgery","volume":"96","author":"Mukherjee S","year":"2014","unstructured":"Mukherjee S, Pringle C, Crocker M: A nine-year review of medicolegal claims in neurosurgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 96:266\u2013270, 20142478001610.1308\/003588414X13814021679834"},{"key":"b15","series-title":"PLoS One","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e39237","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0039237","article-title":"Malpractice liability and defensive medicine: a national survey of neurosurgeons","volume":"7","author":"Nahed BV","year":"2012","unstructured":"Nahed BV, Babu MA, Smith TR, Heary RF: Malpractice liability and defensive medicine: a national survey of neurosurgeons. PLoS One 7:e39237, 20122276174510.1371\/journal.pone.0039237"},{"key":"b16","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"851","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000000878","article-title":"Reason for lawsuit in spinal cord injury affects final outcome","volume":"40","author":"Quigley RS","year":"2015","unstructured":"Quigley RS, Akpolat YT, Forrest BD, Wongworawat MD, Cheng WK: Reason for lawsuit in spinal cord injury affects final outcome. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 40:851\u2013855, 201510.1097\/BRS.000000000000087825768691"},{"issue":"Suppl 2","key":"b17","series-title":"Eur Spine J","first-page":"S196","article-title":"Malpractice litigation and the spine: the NHS perspective on 235 successful claims in England","volume":"21","author":"Quraishi NA","year":"2012","unstructured":"Quraishi NA, Hammett TC, Todd DB, Bhutta MA, Kapoor V: Malpractice litigation and the spine: the NHS perspective on 235 successful claims in England. Eur Spine J 21 (Suppl 2):S196\u2013S199, 2012"},{"key":"b18","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"67","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e31820cccfb","article-title":"Spinal fusion in the United States: analysis of trends from 1998 to 2008","volume":"37","author":"Rajaee SS","year":"2012","unstructured":"Rajaee SS, Bae HW, Kanim LE, Delamarter RB: Spinal fusion in the United States: analysis of trends from 1998 to 2008. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 37:67\u201376, 20122131139910.1097\/BRS.0b013e31820cccfb"},{"key":"b19","series-title":"J Neurosurg","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1108","DOI":"10.3171\/jns.2007.106.6.1108","article-title":"Neurosurgical experience with malpractice litigation: an analysis of closed claims against neurosurgeons in New York State, 1999 through 2003","volume":"106","author":"Rovit RL","year":"2007","unstructured":"Rovit RL, Simon AS, Drew J, Murali R, Robb J: Neurosurgical experience with malpractice litigation: an analysis of closed claims against neurosurgeons in New York State, 1999 through 2003. J Neurosurg 106:1108\u20131114, 20071756419110.3171\/jns.2007.106.6.1108"},{"key":"b20","series-title":"JAMA","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2609","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.293.21.2609","article-title":"Defensive medicine among high-risk specialist physicians in a volatile malpractice environment","volume":"293","author":"Studdert DM","year":"2005","unstructured":"Studdert DM, Mello MM, Sage WM, DesRoches CM, Peugh J, Zapert K, : Defensive medicine among high-risk specialist physicians in a volatile malpractice environment. JAMA 293:2609\u20132617, 200510.1001\/jama.293.21.2609"},{"key":"b21","series-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"367","DOI":"10.1007\/s11999-008-0608-6","article-title":"Juries and medical malpractice claims: empirical facts versus myths","volume":"467","author":"Vidmar N","year":"2009","unstructured":"Vidmar N: Juries and medical malpractice claims: empirical facts versus myths. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467:367\u2013375, 200910.1007\/s11999-008-0608-619002541"}],"container-title":["Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/thejns.org\/view\/journals\/j-neurosurg-spine\/27\/4\/article-p470.xml","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/thejns.org\/downloadpdf\/journals\/j-neurosurg-spine\/27\/4\/article-p470.xml","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"syndication"},{"URL":"https:\/\/thejns.org\/downloadpdf\/journals\/j-neurosurg-spine\/27\/4\/article-p470.xml","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,4,15]],"date-time":"2023-04-15T23:24:06Z","timestamp":1681601046000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/thejns.org\/view\/journals\/j-neurosurg-spine\/27\/4\/article-p470.xml"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2017,10]]},"references-count":21,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4"},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3171\/2016.11.spine16646","relation":{},"ISSN":["1547-5654"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1547-5654","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2017,10]]}}}