{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,13]],"date-time":"2025-12-13T06:50:10Z","timestamp":1765608610658},"reference-count":17,"publisher":"Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG)","issue":"1","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,7]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec><jats:title>OBJECTIVE<\/jats:title><jats:p>Patient-reported outcomes are commonly used to evaluate treatment efficacy. Inefficiencies in standard measurement tools often prove to be a barrier to data collection. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) was developed to overcome these limitations. This tool implements computer-adaptive testing, which enables the assessment of physical function in fewer questions than those required for \u201cstatic\u201d metrics. In spine surgery patients, moderate to strong correlations with Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and the 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) scores have been reported for PROMIS. However, to date, data regarding the efficacy of this tool for patients undergoing minimally invasive (MIS) transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) have been limited.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>METHODS<\/jats:title><jats:p>A prospectively maintained registry of patients who have undergone primary 1- or 2-level MIS TLIF was reviewed retrospectively. Patients with incomplete PROMIS data were excluded. Changes in PROMIS physical function scores 6 weeks, 12 weeks, and 6 months after surgery were analyzed using paired t-tests. PROMIS scores were compared with traditional outcome measures, including SF-12 physical function, ODI, and visual analog scale (VAS) back and leg scores. Correlations were tested using the Pearson correlation coefficient, and the strength of association was interpreted as follows: small, 0.1 \u2264 |r| &lt; 0.3; moderate, 0.3 \u2264 |r| &lt; 0.5; and large, |r| \u2265 0.5. Statistical significance was set at p &lt; 0.05.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>RESULTS<\/jats:title><jats:p>Seventy-four patients were included in this analysis after the exclusion of those without PROMIS scores. The mean preoperative PROMIS score was 35.92 \u00b1 6.98. Significant improvements were demonstrated in PROMIS scores 12 weeks (41.33, p &lt; 0.001) and 6 months (43.58, p &lt; 0.001) after surgery. PROMIS scores demonstrated a significant correlation with SF-12, ODI, and VAS leg scores (p &lt; 0.05). Strong associations with PROMIS scores were observed for SF-12 (r = 0.650 to 0.854), ODI (r = \u22120.525 to \u22120.831), and 6-month VAS back (r = \u22120.693) scores.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>CONCLUSIONS<\/jats:title><jats:p>Physical function as measured by PROMIS improves significantly 12 weeks and 6 months after MIS TLIF. In addition, PROMIS scores have strong correlations with SF-12 and ODI scores. These results suggest that PROMIS scores can be used as a valid assessment of physical function in MIS TLIF patients. Further work is required to determine the full benefits of this measure in other spine populations.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.3171\/2017.11.spine17989","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2018,4,13]],"date-time":"2018-04-13T14:02:19Z","timestamp":1523628139000},"page":"28-33","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":34,"title":["Validity of PROMIS in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a preliminary evaluation"],"prefix":"10.3171","volume":"29","author":[{"given":"Brittany E.","family":"Haws","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Benjamin","family":"Khechen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Jordan A.","family":"Guntin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Kaitlyn L.","family":"Cardinal","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Daniel D.","family":"Bohl","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Kern","family":"Singh","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"1754","reference":[{"key":"b1","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"921","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000001965","article-title":"PROMIS PF CAT outperforms the ODI and SF-36 Physical Function domain in spine patients","volume":"42","author":"Brodke DS","year":"2017","unstructured":"Brodke DS, Goz V, Voss MW, Lawrence BD, Spiker WR, Hung M: PROMIS PF CAT outperforms the ODI and SF-36 Physical Function domain in spine patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 42:921\u2013929, 201710.1097\/BRS.000000000000196527792105"},{"key":"b2","series-title":"Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, ed 2","author":"Cohen J","year":"1988","unstructured":"Cohen J: Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, ed 2. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1988"},{"key":"b3","series-title":"BMC Musculoskelet Disord","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"253","DOI":"10.1186\/s12891-015-0715-y","article-title":"Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) instruments among individuals with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis: a cross-sectional study of floor\/ceiling effects and construct validity","volume":"16","author":"Driban JB","year":"2015","unstructured":"Driban JB, Morgan N, Price LL, Cook KF, Wang C: Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) instruments among individuals with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis: a cross-sectional study of floor\/ceiling effects and construct validity. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 16:253, 201510.1186\/s12891-015-0715-y26369412"},{"key":"b4","series-title":"Physiotherapy","first-page":"271","article-title":"The Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire","volume":"66","author":"Fairbank JC","year":"1980","unstructured":"Fairbank JC, Couper J, Davies JB, O\u2019Brien JP: The Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire. Physiotherapy 66:271\u2013273, 19806450426"},{"key":"b5","series-title":"J Rheumatol","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2061","DOI":"10.3899\/jrheum.090358","article-title":"Progress in assessing physical function in arthritis: PROMIS short forms and computerized adaptive testing","volume":"36","author":"Fries JF","year":"2009","unstructured":"Fries JF, Cella D, Rose M, Krishnan E, Bruce B: Progress in assessing physical function in arthritis: PROMIS short forms and computerized adaptive testing. J Rheumatol 36:2061\u20132066, 20091973821410.3899\/jrheum.090358"},{"key":"b6","series-title":"J Rheumatol","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"153","DOI":"10.3899\/jrheum.130813","article-title":"Item response theory, computerized adaptive testing, and PROMIS: assessment of physical function","volume":"41","author":"Fries JF","year":"2014","unstructured":"Fries JF, Witter J, Rose M, Cella D, Khanna D, Morgan-DeWitt E: Item response theory, computerized adaptive testing, and PROMIS: assessment of physical function. J Rheumatol 41:153\u2013158, 20142424148510.3899\/jrheum.130813"},{"key":"b7","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"429","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000001211","article-title":"Patient-reported outcome instruments in spine surgery","volume":"41","author":"Guzman JZ","year":"2016","unstructured":"Guzman JZ, Cutler HS, Connolly J, Skovrlj B, Mroz TE, Riew KD, : Patient-reported outcome instruments in spine surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 41:429\u2013437, 201610.1097\/BRS.000000000000121126571179"},{"key":"b8","series-title":"Foot Ankle Int","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"911","DOI":"10.1177\/1071100716665113","article-title":"Preoperative PROMIS scores predict postoperative success in foot and ankle patients","volume":"37","author":"Ho B","year":"2016","unstructured":"Ho B, Houck JR, Flemister AS, Ketz J, Oh I, DiGiovanni BF, : Preoperative PROMIS scores predict postoperative success in foot and ankle patients. Foot Ankle Int 37:911\u2013918, 201610.1177\/107110071666511327530986"},{"key":"b9","series-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3466","DOI":"10.1007\/s11999-013-3097-1","article-title":"Validation of PROMIS\u00ae Physical Function computerized adaptive tests for orthopaedic foot and ankle outcome research","volume":"471","author":"Hung M","year":"2013","unstructured":"Hung M, Baumhauer JF, Latt LD, Saltzman CL, SooHoo NF, Hunt KJ: Validation of PROMIS\u00ae Physical Function computerized adaptive tests for orthopaedic foot and ankle outcome research. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471:3466\u20133474, 20132374943310.1007\/s11999-013-3097-1"},{"key":"b10","series-title":"Foot Ankle Int","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1177\/1071100713507905","article-title":"Time for a paradigm shift with computerized adaptive testing of general physical function outcomes measurements","volume":"35","author":"Hung M","year":"2014","unstructured":"Hung M, Franklin JD, Hon SD, Cheng C, Conrad J, Saltzman CL: Time for a paradigm shift with computerized adaptive testing of general physical function outcomes measurements. Foot Ankle Int 35:1\u20137, 201410.1177\/107110071350790524101733"},{"key":"b11","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"158","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000000097","article-title":"Psychometric properties of the PROMIS physical function item bank in patients with spinal disorders","volume":"39","author":"Hung M","year":"2014","unstructured":"Hung M, Hon SD, Franklin JD, Kendall RW, Lawrence BD, Neese A, : Psychometric properties of the PROMIS physical function item bank in patients with spinal disorders. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 39:158\u2013163, 201410.1097\/BRS.000000000000009724173018"},{"key":"b12","series-title":"J Orthop Trauma","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"439","DOI":"10.1097\/BOT.0000000000000059","article-title":"Computerized adaptive testing using the PROMIS physical function item bank reduces test burden with less ceiling effects compared with the short musculoskeletal function assessment in orthopaedic trauma patients","volume":"28","author":"Hung M","year":"2014","unstructured":"Hung M, Stuart AR, Higgins TF, Saltzman CL, Kubiak EN: Computerized adaptive testing using the PROMIS physical function item bank reduces test burden with less ceiling effects compared with the short musculoskeletal function assessment in orthopaedic trauma patients. J Orthop Trauma 28:439\u2013443, 201410.1097\/BOT.000000000000005924378399"},{"key":"b13","series-title":"J Pediatr Orthop","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"749","DOI":"10.1097\/BPO.0000000000000533","article-title":"Ability of PROMIS pediatric measures to detect change in children with cerebral palsy undergoing musculoskeletal surgery","volume":"36","author":"Mulcahey MJ","year":"2016","unstructured":"Mulcahey MJ, Haley SM, Slavin MD, Kisala PA, Ni P, Tulsky DS, : Ability of PROMIS pediatric measures to detect change in children with cerebral palsy undergoing musculoskeletal surgery. J Pediatr Orthop 36:749\u2013756, 20162605706510.1097\/BPO.0000000000000533"},{"key":"b14","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1153","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000001518","article-title":"Correlation of PROMIS Physical Function and Pain CAT instruments with Oswestry Disability Index and Neck Disability Index in spine patients","volume":"41","author":"Papuga MO","year":"2016","unstructured":"Papuga MO, Mesfin A, Molinari R, Rubery PT: Correlation of PROMIS Physical Function and Pain CAT instruments with Oswestry Disability Index and Neck Disability Index in spine patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 41:1153\u20131159, 201610.1097\/BRS.000000000000151826909832"},{"key":"b15","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","first-page":"E1357","article-title":"Concurrent validity and responsiveness of PROMIS health domains among patients presenting for anterior cervical spine surgery","volume":"42","author":"Purvis TE","year":"2017","unstructured":"Purvis TE, Andreou E, Neuman BJ, Riley LH III, Skolasky RL: Concurrent validity and responsiveness of PROMIS health domains among patients presenting for anterior cervical spine surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 42:E1357\u2013E1365, 2017"},{"key":"b16","series-title":"Med Care","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"220","DOI":"10.1097\/00005650-199603000-00003","article-title":"A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity","volume":"34","author":"Ware J Jr","year":"1996","unstructured":"Ware J Jr, Kosinski M, Keller SD: A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care 34:220\u2013233, 199610.1097\/00005650-199603000-000038628042"},{"key":"b17","series-title":"J Clin Nurs","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"798","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2702.2005.01121.x","article-title":"Pain: a review of three commonly used pain rating scales","volume":"14","author":"Williamson A","year":"2005","unstructured":"Williamson A, Hoggart B: Pain: a review of three commonly used pain rating scales. J Clin Nurs 14:798\u2013804, 200510.1111\/j.1365-2702.2005.01121.x"}],"container-title":["Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/thejns.org\/view\/journals\/j-neurosurg-spine\/29\/1\/article-p28.xml","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/thejns.org\/downloadpdf\/journals\/j-neurosurg-spine\/29\/1\/article-p28.xml","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"syndication"},{"URL":"https:\/\/thejns.org\/downloadpdf\/journals\/j-neurosurg-spine\/29\/1\/article-p28.xml","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,4,16]],"date-time":"2023-04-16T00:20:57Z","timestamp":1681604457000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/thejns.org\/view\/journals\/j-neurosurg-spine\/29\/1\/article-p28.xml"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2018,7]]},"references-count":17,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1"},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3171\/2017.11.spine17989","relation":{},"ISSN":["1547-5654"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1547-5654","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2018,7]]}}}