{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,18]],"date-time":"2026-09-18T10:00:31Z","timestamp":1789725631093,"version":"4.0.1"},"reference-count":31,"publisher":"Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG)","issue":"3","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,3]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec><jats:title>OBJECTIVE<\/jats:title><jats:p>Seven cervical total disc replacement (TDR) devices have received FDA approval since 2006. These devices represent a heterogeneous assortment of implants made from various biomaterials with different biomechanical properties. The majority of these devices are composed of metallic endplates with a polymer core. In this prospective, randomized multicenter study, the authors evaluate the safety and efficacy of a metal-on-metal (MoM) TDR (Kineflex|C) versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) in the treatment of single-level spondylosis with radiculopathy through a long-term (5-year) follow-up.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>METHODS<\/jats:title><jats:p>An FDA-regulated investigational device exemption (IDE) pivotal trial was conducted at 21 centers across the United States. Standard validated outcome measures including the Neck Disability Index (NDI) and visual analog scale (VAS) for assessing pain were used. Patients were randomized to undergo TDR using the Kineflex|C cervical artificial disc or anterior cervical fusion using structural allograft and an anterior plate. Patients were evaluated preoperatively and at 6 weeks and 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months after surgery. Serum ion analysis was performed on a subset of patients randomized to receive the MoM TDR.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>RESULTS<\/jats:title><jats:p>A total of 269 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to undergo either TDR (136 patients) or ACDF (133 patients). There were no significant differences between the TDR and ACDF groups in terms of operative time, blood loss, or length of hospital stay. In both groups, the mean NDI scores improved significantly by 6 weeks after surgery and remained significantly improved throughout the 60-month follow-up (both p &lt; 0.01). Similarly, VAS pain scores improved significantly by 6 weeks and remained significantly improved through the 60-month follow-up (both p &lt; 0.01). There were no significant changes in outcomes between the 24- and 60-month follow-ups in either group. Range of motion in the TDR group decreased at 3 months but was significantly greater than the preoperative mean value at the 12- and 24-month follow-ups and remained significantly improved through the 60-month period. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in terms of reoperation\/revision surgery or device-\/surgery-related adverse events. The serum ion analysis revealed cobalt and chromium levels significantly lower than the levels that merit monitoring.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>CONCLUSIONS<\/jats:title><jats:p>Cervical TDR with an MoM device is safe and efficacious at the 5-year follow-up. These results from a prospective randomized study support that Kineflex|C TDR as a viable alternative to ACDF in appropriately selected patients with cervical radiculopathy.<\/jats:p><jats:p>Clinical trial registration no.: NCT00374413 (clinicaltrials.gov)<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.3171\/2017.5.spine16824","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2018,1,5]],"date-time":"2018-01-05T15:02:26Z","timestamp":1515164546000},"page":"252-261","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":75,"title":["Prospective, randomized multicenter study of cervical arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: 5-year results with a metal-on-metal artificial disc"],"prefix":"10.3171","volume":"28","author":[{"given":"Domagoj","family":"Coric","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Carolina Neurosurgery and Spine Associates, Charlotte;"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Richard D.","family":"Guyer","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Texas Back Institute; and"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Pierce D.","family":"Nunley","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Spine Institute of Louisiana, Shreveport, Louisiana;"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"David","family":"Musante","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Triangle Orthopedics Associates, Durham, North Carolina;"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Cameron","family":"Carmody","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Plano Orthopedic Sports Medicine and Spine Center, Plano;"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Charles","family":"Gordon","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Gordon Spine Associates, Tyler;"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Carl","family":"Lauryssen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"NeuroTexas, Austin;"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Margaret O.","family":"Boltes","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Carolina Neurosurgery and Spine Associates, Charlotte;"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Donna D.","family":"Ohnmeiss","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Texas Back Institute Research Foundation, Plano, Texas"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1754","reference":[{"key":"b1","series-title":"Eur Spine J","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1723","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-013-2770-0","article-title":"Five-year results of cervical disc prostheses in the SWISSspine registry","volume":"22","author":"Aghayev E","year":"2013","unstructured":"Aghayev E, B\u00e4rlocher C, Sgier F, Hasdemir M, Steinsiepe KF, Wernli F, : Five-year results of cervical disc prostheses in the SWISSspine registry. Eur Spine J 22:1723\u20131730, 201310.1007\/s00586-013-2770-023584163"},{"key":"b2","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E262","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e318195dd60","article-title":"Delayed hyper-reactivity to metal ions after cervical disc arthroplasty: a case report and literature review","volume":"34","author":"Cavanaugh DA","year":"2009","unstructured":"Cavanaugh DA, Nunley PD, Kerr EJ III, Werner DJ, Jawahar A: Delayed hyper-reactivity to metal ions after cervical disc arthroplasty: a case report and literature review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34:E262\u2013E265, 200910.1097\/BRS.0b013e318195dd60"},{"key":"b3","series-title":"J Neurosurg Spine","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"348","DOI":"10.3171\/2011.5.SPINE10769","article-title":"Prospective, randomized, multicenter study of cervical arthroplasty: 269 patients from the Kineflex|C artificial disc investigational device exemption study with a minimum 2-year follow-up: clinical article","volume":"15","author":"Coric D","year":"2011","unstructured":"Coric D, Nunley PD, Guyer RD, Musante D, Carmody CN, Gordon CR, : Prospective, randomized, multicenter study of cervical arthroplasty: 269 patients from the Kineflex|C artificial disc investigational device exemption study with a minimum 2-year follow-up: clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine 15:348\u2013358, 201110.3171\/2011.5.SPINE1076921699471"},{"key":"b4","series-title":"J Neurosurg Spine","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"15","DOI":"10.3171\/2014.7.SPINE13953","article-title":"Two-level total disc replacement with Mobi-C cervical artificial disc versus anterior discectomy and fusion: a prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter clinical trial with 4-year follow-up results","volume":"22","author":"Davis RJ","year":"2015","unstructured":"Davis RJ, Nunley PD, Kim KD, Hisey MS, Jackson RJ, Bae HW, : Two-level total disc replacement with Mobi-C cervical artificial disc versus anterior discectomy and fusion: a prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter clinical trial with 4-year follow-up results. J Neurosurg Spine 22:15\u201325, 201510.3171\/2014.7.SPINE1395325380538"},{"key":"b5","series-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"318","DOI":"10.1007\/s11999-009-1029-x","article-title":"Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing versus large-diameter head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: a randomized clinical trial","volume":"468","author":"Garbuz DS","year":"2010","unstructured":"Garbuz DS, Tanzer M, Greidanus NV, Masri BA, Duncan CP: Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing versus large-diameter head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:318\u2013325, 20101969709010.1007\/s11999-009-1029-x"},{"key":"b6","series-title":"Eur Spine J","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"741","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-012-2581-8","article-title":"Prospective study on serum metal levels in patients with metal-on-metal lumbar disc arthroplasty","volume":"22","author":"Gornet MF","year":"2013","unstructured":"Gornet MF, Burkus JK, Harper ML, Chan FW, Skipor AK, Jacobs JJ: Prospective study on serum metal levels in patients with metal-on-metal lumbar disc arthroplasty. Eur Spine J 22:741\u2013746, 201310.1007\/s00586-012-2581-823179981"},{"key":"b7","series-title":"J Neurosurg Spine","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"558","DOI":"10.3171\/2015.1.SPINE14589","article-title":"Cervical disc arthroplasty with PRESTIGE LP disc versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a prospective, multicenter investigational device exemption study","volume":"23","author":"Gornet MF","year":"2015","unstructured":"Gornet MF, Burkus JK, Shaffrey ME, Argires PJ, Nian H, Harrell FE Jr: Cervical disc arthroplasty with PRESTIGE LP disc versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a prospective, multicenter investigational device exemption study. J Neurosurg Spine 23:558\u2013573, 20152623042410.3171\/2015.1.SPINE14589"},{"key":"b8","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000001168","article-title":"Five-year follow-up of a prospective, randomized trial comparing two lumbar total disc replacements","volume":"41","author":"Guyer RD","year":"2016","unstructured":"Guyer RD, Pettine K, Roh JS, Dimmig TA, Coric D, McAfee PC, : Five-year follow-up of a prospective, randomized trial comparing two lumbar total disc replacements. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 41:3\u20138, 20162633566910.1097\/BRS.0000000000001168"},{"key":"b9","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E492","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e31820ea9a2","article-title":"Early failure of metal-on-metal artificial disc prostheses associated with lymphocytic reaction: diagnosis and treatment experience in four cases","volume":"36","author":"Guyer RD","year":"2011","unstructured":"Guyer RD, Shellock J, MacLennan B, Hanscom D, Knight RQ, McCombe P, : Early failure of metal-on-metal artificial disc prostheses associated with lymphocytic reaction: diagnosis and treatment experience in four cases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36:E492\u2013E497, 201110.1097\/BRS.0b013e31820ea9a2"},{"key":"b10","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"101","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e31818ee263","article-title":"Comparison of BRYAN cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical decompression and fusion: clinical and radiographic results of a randomized, controlled, clinical trial","volume":"34","author":"Heller JG","year":"2009","unstructured":"Heller JG, Sasso RC, Papadopoulos SM, Anderson PA, Fessler RG, Hacker RJ, : Comparison of BRYAN cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical decompression and fusion: clinical and radiographic results of a randomized, controlled, clinical trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34:101\u2013107, 20091911233710.1097\/BRS.0b013e31818ee263"},{"key":"b11","series-title":"Int J Spine Surg","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"7","DOI":"10.14444\/1007","article-title":"Multi-center, prospective, randomized, controlled investigational device exemption clinical trial comparing Mobi-C Cervical Artificial Disc to anterior discectomy and fusion in the treatment of symptomatic degenerative disc disease in the cervical spine","volume":"8","author":"Hisey MS","year":"2014","unstructured":"Hisey MS, Bae HW, Davis R, Gaede S, Hoffman G, Kim K, : Multi-center, prospective, randomized, controlled investigational device exemption clinical trial comparing Mobi-C Cervical Artificial Disc to anterior discectomy and fusion in the treatment of symptomatic degenerative disc disease in the cervical spine. Int J Spine Surg 8:7, 201410.14444\/1007"},{"key":"b12","series-title":"Int J Spine Surg","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"10","DOI":"10.14444\/3010","article-title":"Prospective, randomized comparison of one-level Mobi-C Cervical Total Disc Replacement vs. anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: results at 5-year follow-up","volume":"10","author":"Hisey MS","year":"2016","unstructured":"Hisey MS, Zigler JE, Jackson R, Nunley PD, Bae HW, Kim KD, : Prospective, randomized comparison of one-level Mobi-C Cervical Total Disc Replacement vs. anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: results at 5-year follow-up. Int J Spine Surg 10:10, 201610.14444\/301027162712"},{"key":"b13","series-title":"Spine J","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1362","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2014.02.034","article-title":"Osteolysis in the setting of metal-on-metal cervical disc arthroplasty","volume":"14","author":"Kang DG","year":"2014","unstructured":"Kang DG, Wagner SC, Lehman RA Jr: Osteolysis in the setting of metal-on-metal cervical disc arthroplasty. Spine J 14:1362\u20131365, 20142461425810.1016\/j.spinee.2014.02.034"},{"key":"b14","series-title":"Case Rep Orthop","first-page":"416548","article-title":"Delayed hypersensitivity reaction: an increasingly recognized complication of metal-on-metal total disc replacement","volume":"2015","author":"Karnoub MA","year":"2015","unstructured":"Karnoub MA, Zairi F, Aboukais R, Assaker R: Delayed hypersensitivity reaction: an increasingly recognized complication of metal-on-metal total disc replacement. Case Rep Orthop 2015:416548, 201526346567"},{"key":"b15","series-title":"Clin Spine Surg","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E309","DOI":"10.1097\/BSD.0000000000000054","article-title":"Do postoperative biomechanical changes induce heterotopic ossification after cervical arthroplasty?: A 5-year follow-up study","volume":"29","author":"Kim KS","year":"2016","unstructured":"Kim KS, Heo DH: Do postoperative biomechanical changes induce heterotopic ossification after cervical arthroplasty?: A 5-year follow-up study. Clin Spine Surg 29:E309\u2013E313, 201610.1097\/BSD.0000000000000054"},{"key":"b16","series-title":"Orthop Traumatol Surg Res","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"643","DOI":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2015.05.005","article-title":"Delayed hypersensitivity reaction after cervical disc replacement: a case report","volume":"101","author":"Lagier M","year":"2015","unstructured":"Lagier M, Briere M, Giorgi H, Fuentes S, Blondel B, Tropiano P: Delayed hypersensitivity reaction after cervical disc replacement: a case report. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 101:643\u2013645, 201510.1016\/j.otsr.2015.05.00526205565"},{"issue":"406","key":"b17","series-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"282","DOI":"10.1097\/00003086-200301000-00039","article-title":"Metal-on-metal versus polyethylene in hip arthroplasty: a randomized clinical trial","author":"MacDonald SJ","year":"2003","unstructured":"MacDonald SJ, McCalden RW, Chess DG, Bourne RB, Rorabeck CH, Cleland D, : Metal-on-metal versus polyethylene in hip arthroplasty: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res (406):282\u2013296, 200310.1097\/00003086-200301000-0003912579029"},{"key":"b18","series-title":"J Spinal Disord Tech","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"384","DOI":"10.1097\/00024720-200308000-00010","article-title":"Classification of heterotopic ossification (HO) in artificial disk replacement","volume":"16","author":"McAfee PC","year":"2003","unstructured":"McAfee PC, Cunningham BW, Devine J, Williams E, Yu-Yahiro J: Classification of heterotopic ossification (HO) in artificial disk replacement. J Spinal Disord Tech 16:384\u2013389, 200310.1097\/00024720-200308000-00010"},{"key":"b19","article-title":"Medical device alert: All metal-on-metal (MoM) hip replacements","unstructured":"Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency: Medical device alert: All metal-on-metal (MoM) hip replacements. (http:\/\/webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk\/20130513184637\/http:\/\/www.mhra.gov.uk\/home\/groups\/dts-bs\/documents\/medicaldevicealert\/con079162.pdf) [Accessed September 19, 2017]"},{"key":"b20","series-title":"J Biomech","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"504","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jbiomech.2011.11.045","article-title":"Friction in metal-on-metal total disc arthroplasty: effect of ball radius","volume":"45","author":"Moghadas P","year":"2012","unstructured":"Moghadas P, Mahomed A, Hukins DW, Shepherd DE: Friction in metal-on-metal total disc arthroplasty: effect of ball radius. J Biomech 45:504\u2013509, 20122217767010.1016\/j.jbiomech.2011.11.045"},{"key":"b21","series-title":"J Neurosurg Spine","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"198","DOI":"10.3171\/spi.2007.6.3.198","article-title":"Clinical and radiographic analysis of cervical disc arthroplasty compared with allograft fusion: a randomized controlled clinical trial","volume":"6","author":"Mummaneni PV","year":"2007","unstructured":"Mummaneni PV, Burkus JK, Haid RW, Traynelis VC, Zdeblick TA: Clinical and radiographic analysis of cervical disc arthroplasty compared with allograft fusion: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Neurosurg Spine 6:198\u2013209, 200710.3171\/spi.2007.6.3.19817355018"},{"key":"b22","series-title":"Spine J","first-page":"275","article-title":"Results of the prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-C total disc replacement versus anterior discectomy and fusion for the treatment of 1-level symptomatic cervical disc disease","volume":"9","author":"Murrey D","year":"2009","unstructured":"Murrey D, Janssen M, Delamarter R, Goldstein J, Zigler J, Tay B, : Results of the prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-C total disc replacement versus anterior discectomy and fusion for the treatment of 1-level symptomatic cervical disc disease. Spine J 9:275\u2013286, 200918774751"},{"key":"b23","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"674","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000000869","article-title":"Long-term outcomes of the US FDA IDE prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial comparing PCM cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion","volume":"40","author":"Phillips FM","year":"2015","unstructured":"Phillips FM, Geisler FH, Gilder KM, Reah C, Howell KM, McAfee PC: Long-term outcomes of the US FDA IDE prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial comparing PCM cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 40:674\u2013683, 201510.1097\/BRS.000000000000086925955086"},{"key":"b24","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E907","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e318296232f","article-title":"A prospective, randomized, controlled clinical investigation comparing PCM cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. 2-year results from the US FDA IDE clinical trial","volume":"38","author":"Phillips FM","year":"2013","unstructured":"Phillips FM, Lee JY, Geisler FH, Cappuccino A, Chaput CD, DeVine JG, : A prospective, randomized, controlled clinical investigation comparing PCM cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. 2-year results from the US FDA IDE clinical trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38:E907\u2013E918, 201310.1097\/BRS.0b013e318296232f"},{"key":"b25","series-title":"J Neurosurg Spine","first-page":"213","article-title":"Five-year clinical results of cervical total disc replacement compared with anterior discectomy and fusion for treatment of 2-level symptomatic degenerative disc disease: a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter investigational device exemption clinical trial","volume":"25","author":"Radcliff K","year":"2016","unstructured":"Radcliff K, Coric D, Albert T: Five-year clinical results of cervical total disc replacement compared with anterior discectomy and fusion for treatment of 2-level symptomatic degenerative disc disease: a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter investigational device exemption clinical trial. J Neurosurg Spine 25:213\u2013224, 201627015130"},{"key":"b26","series-title":"Spine J","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"136","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2015.11.056","article-title":"Total disc arthroplasty versus anterior cervical interbody fusion: use of the Spine Tango registry to supplement the evidence from randomized control trials","volume":"16","author":"Staub LP","year":"2016","unstructured":"Staub LP, Ryser C, R\u00f6der C, Mannion AF, Jarvik JG, Aebi M, : Total disc arthroplasty versus anterior cervical interbody fusion: use of the Spine Tango registry to supplement the evidence from randomized control trials. Spine J 16:136\u2013145, 20162667444510.1016\/j.spinee.2015.11.056"},{"key":"b27","series-title":"Clin Spine Surg","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E578","DOI":"10.1097\/BSD.0000000000000206","article-title":"Comparison of the clinical and radiographic results between cervical artificial disc replacement and anterior cervical fusion: a 6-year prospective nonrandomized comparative study","volume":"30","author":"Tian W","year":"2017","unstructured":"Tian W, Yan K, Han X, Yu J, Jin P, Han X: Comparison of the clinical and radiographic results between cervical artificial disc replacement and anterior cervical fusion: a 6-year prospective nonrandomized comparative study. Clin Spine Surg 30:E578\u2013E586, 201710.1097\/BSD.0000000000000206"},{"key":"b28","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2227","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000000031","article-title":"Clinical outcomes with selectively constrained SECURE-C cervical disc arthroplasty: two-year results from a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter investigational device exemption study","volume":"38","author":"Vaccaro A","year":"2013","unstructured":"Vaccaro A, Beutler W, Peppelman W, Marzluff JM, Highsmith J, Mugglin A, : Clinical outcomes with selectively constrained SECURE-C cervical disc arthroplasty: two-year results from a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter investigational device exemption study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38:2227\u20132239, 20132433562910.1097\/BRS.0000000000000031"},{"key":"b29","series-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"377","DOI":"10.1007\/s11999-012-2526-x","article-title":"The interpretation of metal ion levels in unilateral and bilateral hip resurfacing","volume":"471","author":"Van Der Straeten C","year":"2013","unstructured":"Van Der Straeten C, Grammatopoulos G, Gill HS, Calistri A, Campbell P, De Smet KA: The interpretation of metal ion levels in unilateral and bilateral hip resurfacing. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471:377\u2013385, 201310.1007\/s11999-012-2526-x"},{"key":"b30","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"433","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e31822699fa","article-title":"Randomized, controlled, multicenter, clinical trial comparing BRYAN cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical decompression and fusion in China","volume":"37","author":"Zhang X","year":"2012","unstructured":"Zhang X, Zhang X, Chen C, Zhang Y, Wang Z, Wang B, : Randomized, controlled, multicenter, clinical trial comparing BRYAN cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical decompression and fusion in China. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 37:433\u2013438, 201210.1097\/BRS.0b013e31822699fa21673620"},{"key":"b31","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"203","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e318278eb38","article-title":"ProDisc-C and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion as surgical treatment for single-level cervical symptomatic degenerative disc disease: five-year results of a Food and Drug Administration study","volume":"38","author":"Zigler JE","year":"2013","unstructured":"Zigler JE, Delamarter R, Murrey D, Spivak J, Janssen M: ProDisc-C and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion as surgical treatment for single-level cervical symptomatic degenerative disc disease: five-year results of a Food and Drug Administration study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38:203\u2013209, 20132308042710.1097\/BRS.0b013e318278eb38"}],"container-title":["Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/thejns.org\/view\/journals\/j-neurosurg-spine\/28\/3\/article-p252.xml","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/thejns.org\/downloadpdf\/journals\/j-neurosurg-spine\/28\/3\/article-p252.xml","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"syndication"},{"URL":"https:\/\/thejns.org\/downloadpdf\/journals\/j-neurosurg-spine\/28\/3\/article-p252.xml","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,4,15]],"date-time":"2023-04-15T23:58:44Z","timestamp":1681603124000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/thejns.org\/view\/journals\/j-neurosurg-spine\/28\/3\/article-p252.xml"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2018,3]]},"references-count":31,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3"},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3171\/2017.5.spine16824","relation":{},"ISSN":["1547-5654"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1547-5654","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2018,3]]}}}