{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,23]],"date-time":"2026-10-23T06:46:37Z","timestamp":1792737997827,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":32,"publisher":"Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG)","issue":"4","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,4]]},"abstract":"\n OBJECTIVE<\/jats:title>\n Lumbar fusion is typically associated with high degrees of pain and immobility. The implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) approach has been successful in speeding the recovery after other surgical procedures. In this paper, the authors examined the results of early implementation of ERAS for lumbar fusion.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n METHODS<\/jats:title>\n Beginning in March 2018 at the authors\u2019 institution, all patients undergoing posterior, 1- to 3-level lumbar fusion surgery by any of 3 spine surgeons received an intraoperative injection of liposomal bupivacaine, immediate single postoperative infusion of 1-g intravenous acetaminophen, and daily postoperative visits from the authors\u2019 multidisciplinary ERAS care team. Non\u2013English- or non\u2013Spanish-speaking patients and those undergoing nonelective or staged procedures were excluded. Reviews of medical records were conducted for the ERAS cohort of 57 patients and a comparison group of 40 patients who underwent the same procedures during the 6 months before implementation.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n RESULTS<\/jats:title>\n \n Groups did not differ significantly with regard to sex, age, or BMI (all p\n ><\/jats:italic>\n 0.05). Length of stay was significantly shorter in the ERAS cohort than in the control cohort (2.9 days vs 3.8 days; p = 0.01). Patients in the ERAS group consumed significantly less oxycodone-acetaminophen than the controls on postoperative day (POD) 0 (408.0 mg vs 1094.7 mg; p\n =<\/jats:italic>\n 0.0004), POD 1 (1320.0 mg vs 1708.4 mg; p\n =<\/jats:italic>\n 0.04), and POD 3 (1500.1 mg vs 2105.4 mg; p\n =<\/jats:italic>\n 0.03). Postoperative pain scores recorded by the physical therapy and occupational therapy teams and nursing staff each day were lower in the ERAS cohort than in controls, with POD 1 achieving significance (4.2 vs 6.0; p\n =<\/jats:italic>\n 0.006). The total amount of meperidine (8.8 mg vs 44.7 mg; p = 0.003) consumed was also significantly decreased in the ERAS group, as was ondansetron (2.8 mg vs 6.0 mg; p = 0.02). Distance ambulated on each POD was farther in the ERAS cohort, with ambulation on POD 1 (109.4 ft vs 41.4 ft; p = 0.002) achieving significance.\n <\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n CONCLUSIONS<\/jats:title>\n In this very initial implementation of the first phase of an ERAS program for short-segment lumbar fusion, the authors were able to demonstrate substantial positive effects on the early recovery process. Importantly, these effects were not surgeon-specific and could be generalized across surgeons with disparate technical predilections. The authors plan additional iterations to their ERAS protocols for continued quality improvements.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.3171\/2019.1.focus18692","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2019,4,9]],"date-time":"2019-04-09T16:07:14Z","timestamp":1554826034000},"page":"E4","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":111,"title":["Reductions in length of stay, narcotics use, and pain following implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery program for 1- to 3-level lumbar fusion surgery"],"prefix":"10.3171","volume":"46","author":[{"given":"G. Damian","family":"Brusko","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Departments of Neurological Surgery and"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"John Paul G.","family":"Kolcun","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Departments of Neurological Surgery and"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Julie A.","family":"Heger","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Departments of Neurological Surgery and"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Allan D.","family":"Levi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Departments of Neurological Surgery and"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Glen R.","family":"Manzano","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Departments of Neurological Surgery and"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Karthik","family":"Madhavan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Departments of Neurological Surgery and"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Timur","family":"Urakov","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Departments of Neurological Surgery and"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Richard H.","family":"Epstein","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Anesthesiology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Michael Y.","family":"Wang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Departments of Neurological Surgery and"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1754","reference":[{"key":"b1","series-title":"Clin Neurol Neurosurg","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"142","DOI":"10.1016\/j.clineuro.2017.12.003","article-title":"Pre-optimization of spinal surgery patients: development of a neurosurgical enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol","volume":"164","author":"Ali ZS","year":"2018","unstructured":"Ali ZS, Ma TS, Ozturk AK, Malhotra NR, Schuster JM, Marcotte PJ, : Pre-optimization of spinal surgery patients: development of a neurosurgical enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 164:142\u2013153, 201810.1016\/j.clineuro.2017.12.00329232645"},{"key":"b2","series-title":"J Neurosurg Spine","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"588","DOI":"10.3171\/2018.4.SPINE171317","article-title":"Implementation of an Enhanced Recovery After Spine Surgery program at a large cancer center: a preliminary analysis","volume":"29","author":"Grasu RM","year":"2018","unstructured":"Grasu RM, Cata JP, Dang AQ, Tatsui CE, Rhines LD, Hagan KB, : Implementation of an Enhanced Recovery After Spine Surgery program at a large cancer center: a preliminary analysis. J Neurosurg Spine 29:588\u2013598, 201810.3171\/2018.4.SPINE171317"},{"key":"b3","series-title":"Int J Surg","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"16","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijsu.2008.11.004","article-title":"Implementation of ERAS and how to overcome the barriers","volume":"7","author":"Kahokehr A","year":"2009","unstructured":"Kahokehr A, Sammour T, Zargar-Shoshtari K, Thompson L, Hill AG: Implementation of ERAS and how to overcome the barriers. Int J Surg 7:16\u201319, 200910.1016\/j.ijsu.2008.11.00419110478"},{"key":"b4","series-title":"Br J Anaesth","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"606","DOI":"10.1093\/bja\/78.5.606","article-title":"Multimodal approach to control postoperative pathophysiology and rehabilitation","volume":"78","author":"Kehlet H","year":"1997","unstructured":"Kehlet H: Multimodal approach to control postoperative pathophysiology and rehabilitation. Br J Anaesth 78:606\u2013617, 199710.1093\/bja\/78.5.6069175983"},{"key":"b5","series-title":"Curr Opin Crit Care","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"355","DOI":"10.1097\/MCC.0b013e32832fbbe7","article-title":"Multimodal approach to postoperative recovery","volume":"15","author":"Kehlet H","year":"2009","unstructured":"Kehlet H: Multimodal approach to postoperative recovery. Curr Opin Crit Care 15:355\u2013358, 200910.1097\/MCC.0b013e32832fbbe719617822"},{"key":"b6","series-title":"Anesth Analg","first-page":"1048","article-title":"The value of \u201cmultimodal\u201d or \u201cbalanced analgesia\u201d in postoperative pain treatment","volume":"77","author":"Kehlet H","year":"1993","unstructured":"Kehlet H, Dahl JB: The value of \u201cmultimodal\u201d or \u201cbalanced analgesia\u201d in postoperative pain treatment. Anesth Analg 77:1048\u20131056, 19938105724"},{"key":"b7","series-title":"Am J Surg","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"630","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9610(02)00866-8","article-title":"Multimodal strategies to improve surgical outcome","volume":"183","author":"Kehlet H","year":"2002","unstructured":"Kehlet H, Wilmore DW: Multimodal strategies to improve surgical outcome. Am J Surg 183:630\u2013641, 200210.1016\/S0002-9610(02)00866-812095591"},{"key":"b8","series-title":"Eur Spine J","article-title":"A comprehensive multimodal pain treatment reduces opioid consumption after multilevel spine surgery","volume":"22","author":"Mathiesen O","year":"2089\u20132096","unstructured":"Mathiesen O, Dahl B, Thomsen BA, Kitter B, Sonne N, Dahl JB, : A comprehensive multimodal pain treatment reduces opioid consumption after multilevel spine surgery. Eur Spine J 22:2089\u20132096, 2013"},{"key":"b9","series-title":"World Neurosurg","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"230","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2013.01.041","article-title":"Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis: comparative effectiveness and cost-utility analysis","volume":"82","author":"Parker SL","year":"2014","unstructured":"Parker SL, Mendenhall SK, Shau DN, Zuckerman SL, Godil SS, Cheng JS, : Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis: comparative effectiveness and cost-utility analysis. World Neurosurg 82:230\u2013238, 201410.1016\/j.wneu.2013.01.04123321379"},{"issue":"38","key":"b10","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1799","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3182a314d0","article-title":"Who should undergo surgery for degenerative spondylolisthesis? Treatment effect predictors in SPORT","author":"Pearson AM","year":"2013","unstructured":"Pearson AM, Lurie JD, Tosteson TD, Zhao W, Abdu WA, Weinstein JN: Who should undergo surgery for degenerative spondylolisthesis? Treatment effect predictors in SPORT. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38:1799\u20131811, 20132384650210.1097\/BRS.0b013e3182a314d0"},{"issue":"28","key":"b11","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2352","DOI":"10.1097\/01.BRS.0000085344.22471.23","article-title":"Biomechanical comparison of cervical spine reconstructive techniques after a multilevel corpectomy of the cervical spine","author":"Singh K","year":"2003","unstructured":"Singh K, Vaccaro AR, Kim J, Lorenz EP, Lim TH, An HS: Biomechanical comparison of cervical spine reconstructive techniques after a multilevel corpectomy of the cervical spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28:2352\u20132358, 200310.1097\/01.BRS.0000085344.22471.2314560082"},{"key":"b12","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","article-title":"Design and implementation of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) program for minimally invasive lumbar decompression spine surgery: initial experience","author":"Soffin EM","unstructured":"Soffin EM, Vaishnav AS, Wetmore D, Barber L, Hill P, Gang CH, : Design and implementation of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) program for minimally invasive lumbar decompression spine surgery: initial experience. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) [epub ahead of print], 201830325887"},{"key":"b13","series-title":"Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"91","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bpa.2015.11.001","article-title":"Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) and its applicability for major spine surgery","volume":"30","author":"Wainwright TW","year":"2016","unstructured":"Wainwright TW, Immins T, Middleton RG: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) and its applicability for major spine surgery. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 30:91\u2013102, 20162703660610.1016\/j.bpa.2015.11.001"},{"key":"b14","series-title":"J Neurosurg Spine","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"411","DOI":"10.3171\/2016.9.SPINE16375","article-title":"Development of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) approach for lumbar spinal fusion","volume":"26","author":"Wang MY","year":"2017","unstructured":"Wang MY, Chang PY, Grossman J: Development of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) approach for lumbar spinal fusion. J Neurosurg Spine 26:411\u2013418, 201710.3171\/2016.9.SPINE16375"},{"key":"b15","series-title":"J Neurosurg Spine","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"694","DOI":"10.3171\/2009.12.SPINE09621","article-title":"An analysis of the differences in the acute hospitalization charges following minimally invasive versus open posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Presented at the 2009 Joint Spine Section Meeting","volume":"12","author":"Wang MY","year":"2010","unstructured":"Wang MY, Cummock MD, Yu Y, Trivedi RA: An analysis of the differences in the acute hospitalization charges following minimally invasive versus open posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Presented at the 2009 Joint Spine Section Meeting. J Neurosurg Spine 12:694\u2013699, 201010.3171\/2009.12.SPINE09621"},{"key":"b16","series-title":"J Spinal Disord Tech","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"324","DOI":"10.1097\/BSD.0b013e318220be32","article-title":"Acute hospital costs after minimally invasive versus open lumbar interbody fusion: data from a US national database with 6106 patients","volume":"25","author":"Wang MY","year":"2012","unstructured":"Wang MY, Lerner J, Lesko J, McGirt MJ: Acute hospital costs after minimally invasive versus open lumbar interbody fusion: data from a US national database with 6106 patients. J Spinal Disord Tech 25:324\u2013328, 20122168580610.1097\/BSD.0b013e318220be32"},{"key":"b1","series-title":"Clin Neurol Neurosurg","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"142","DOI":"10.1016\/j.clineuro.2017.12.003","article-title":"Pre-optimization of spinal surgery patients: development of a neurosurgical enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol","volume":"164","author":"Ali ZS","year":"2018","unstructured":"Ali ZS, Ma TS, Ozturk AK, Malhotra NR, Schuster JM, Marcotte PJ, : Pre-optimization of spinal surgery patients: development of a neurosurgical enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 164:142\u2013153, 201810.1016\/j.clineuro.2017.12.00329232645"},{"key":"b2","series-title":"J Neurosurg Spine","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"588","DOI":"10.3171\/2018.4.SPINE171317","article-title":"Implementation of an Enhanced Recovery After Spine Surgery program at a large cancer center: a preliminary analysis","volume":"29","author":"Grasu RM","year":"2018","unstructured":"Grasu RM, Cata JP, Dang AQ, Tatsui CE, Rhines LD, Hagan KB, : Implementation of an Enhanced Recovery After Spine Surgery program at a large cancer center: a preliminary analysis. J Neurosurg Spine 29:588\u2013598, 201810.3171\/2018.4.SPINE171317"},{"key":"b3","series-title":"Int J Surg","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"16","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijsu.2008.11.004","article-title":"Implementation of ERAS and how to overcome the barriers","volume":"7","author":"Kahokehr A","year":"2009","unstructured":"Kahokehr A, Sammour T, Zargar-Shoshtari K, Thompson L, Hill AG: Implementation of ERAS and how to overcome the barriers. Int J Surg 7:16\u201319, 200910.1016\/j.ijsu.2008.11.00419110478"},{"key":"b4","series-title":"Br J Anaesth","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"606","DOI":"10.1093\/bja\/78.5.606","article-title":"Multimodal approach to control postoperative pathophysiology and rehabilitation","volume":"78","author":"Kehlet H","year":"1997","unstructured":"Kehlet H: Multimodal approach to control postoperative pathophysiology and rehabilitation. Br J Anaesth 78:606\u2013617, 199710.1093\/bja\/78.5.6069175983"},{"key":"b5","series-title":"Curr Opin Crit Care","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"355","DOI":"10.1097\/MCC.0b013e32832fbbe7","article-title":"Multimodal approach to postoperative recovery","volume":"15","author":"Kehlet H","year":"2009","unstructured":"Kehlet H: Multimodal approach to postoperative recovery. Curr Opin Crit Care 15:355\u2013358, 200910.1097\/MCC.0b013e32832fbbe719617822"},{"key":"b6","series-title":"Anesth Analg","first-page":"1048","article-title":"The value of \u201cmultimodal\u201d or \u201cbalanced analgesia\u201d in postoperative pain treatment","volume":"77","author":"Kehlet H","year":"1993","unstructured":"Kehlet H, Dahl JB: The value of \u201cmultimodal\u201d or \u201cbalanced analgesia\u201d in postoperative pain treatment. Anesth Analg 77:1048\u20131056, 19938105724"},{"key":"b7","series-title":"Am J Surg","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"630","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9610(02)00866-8","article-title":"Multimodal strategies to improve surgical outcome","volume":"183","author":"Kehlet H","year":"2002","unstructured":"Kehlet H, Wilmore DW: Multimodal strategies to improve surgical outcome. Am J Surg 183:630\u2013641, 200210.1016\/S0002-9610(02)00866-812095591"},{"key":"b8","series-title":"Eur Spine J","article-title":"A comprehensive multimodal pain treatment reduces opioid consumption after multilevel spine surgery","volume":"22","author":"Mathiesen O","year":"2089\u20132096","unstructured":"Mathiesen O, Dahl B, Thomsen BA, Kitter B, Sonne N, Dahl JB, : A comprehensive multimodal pain treatment reduces opioid consumption after multilevel spine surgery. Eur Spine J 22:2089\u20132096, 2013"},{"key":"b9","series-title":"World Neurosurg","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"230","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2013.01.041","article-title":"Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis: comparative effectiveness and cost-utility analysis","volume":"82","author":"Parker SL","year":"2014","unstructured":"Parker SL, Mendenhall SK, Shau DN, Zuckerman SL, Godil SS, Cheng JS, : Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis: comparative effectiveness and cost-utility analysis. World Neurosurg 82:230\u2013238, 201410.1016\/j.wneu.2013.01.04123321379"},{"issue":"38","key":"b10","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1799","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3182a314d0","article-title":"Who should undergo surgery for degenerative spondylolisthesis? Treatment effect predictors in SPORT","author":"Pearson AM","year":"2013","unstructured":"Pearson AM, Lurie JD, Tosteson TD, Zhao W, Abdu WA, Weinstein JN: Who should undergo surgery for degenerative spondylolisthesis? Treatment effect predictors in SPORT. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38:1799\u20131811, 20132384650210.1097\/BRS.0b013e3182a314d0"},{"issue":"28","key":"b11","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2352","DOI":"10.1097\/01.BRS.0000085344.22471.23","article-title":"Biomechanical comparison of cervical spine reconstructive techniques after a multilevel corpectomy of the cervical spine","author":"Singh K","year":"2003","unstructured":"Singh K, Vaccaro AR, Kim J, Lorenz EP, Lim TH, An HS: Biomechanical comparison of cervical spine reconstructive techniques after a multilevel corpectomy of the cervical spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28:2352\u20132358, 200310.1097\/01.BRS.0000085344.22471.2314560082"},{"key":"b12","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","article-title":"Design and implementation of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) program for minimally invasive lumbar decompression spine surgery: initial experience","author":"Soffin EM","unstructured":"Soffin EM, Vaishnav AS, Wetmore D, Barber L, Hill P, Gang CH, : Design and implementation of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) program for minimally invasive lumbar decompression spine surgery: initial experience. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) [epub ahead of print], 201830325887"},{"key":"b13","series-title":"Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"91","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bpa.2015.11.001","article-title":"Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) and its applicability for major spine surgery","volume":"30","author":"Wainwright TW","year":"2016","unstructured":"Wainwright TW, Immins T, Middleton RG: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) and its applicability for major spine surgery. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 30:91\u2013102, 20162703660610.1016\/j.bpa.2015.11.001"},{"key":"b14","series-title":"J Neurosurg Spine","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"411","DOI":"10.3171\/2016.9.SPINE16375","article-title":"Development of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) approach for lumbar spinal fusion","volume":"26","author":"Wang MY","year":"2017","unstructured":"Wang MY, Chang PY, Grossman J: Development of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) approach for lumbar spinal fusion. J Neurosurg Spine 26:411\u2013418, 201710.3171\/2016.9.SPINE16375"},{"key":"b15","series-title":"J Neurosurg Spine","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"694","DOI":"10.3171\/2009.12.SPINE09621","article-title":"An analysis of the differences in the acute hospitalization charges following minimally invasive versus open posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Presented at the 2009 Joint Spine Section Meeting","volume":"12","author":"Wang MY","year":"2010","unstructured":"Wang MY, Cummock MD, Yu Y, Trivedi RA: An analysis of the differences in the acute hospitalization charges following minimally invasive versus open posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Presented at the 2009 Joint Spine Section Meeting. J Neurosurg Spine 12:694\u2013699, 201010.3171\/2009.12.SPINE09621"},{"key":"b16","series-title":"J Spinal Disord Tech","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"324","DOI":"10.1097\/BSD.0b013e318220be32","article-title":"Acute hospital costs after minimally invasive versus open lumbar interbody fusion: data from a US national database with 6106 patients","volume":"25","author":"Wang MY","year":"2012","unstructured":"Wang MY, Lerner J, Lesko J, McGirt MJ: Acute hospital costs after minimally invasive versus open lumbar interbody fusion: data from a US national database with 6106 patients. J Spinal Disord Tech 25:324\u2013328, 20122168580610.1097\/BSD.0b013e318220be32"}],"container-title":["Neurosurgical Focus"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/thejns.org\/view\/journals\/neurosurg-focus\/46\/4\/article-pE4.xml","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/thejns.org\/downloadpdf\/journals\/neurosurg-focus\/46\/4\/article-pE4.xml","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"syndication"},{"URL":"https:\/\/thejns.org\/downloadpdf\/journals\/neurosurg-focus\/46\/4\/article-pE4.xml","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,30]],"date-time":"2026-05-30T08:44:49Z","timestamp":1780130689000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/thejns.org\/view\/journals\/neurosurg-focus\/46\/4\/article-pE4.xml"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2019,4]]},"references-count":32,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4"},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3171\/2019.1.focus18692","relation":{},"ISSN":["1092-0684"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1092-0684","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2019,4]]}}}