{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,13]],"date-time":"2026-10-13T13:50:35Z","timestamp":1791899435622,"version":"4.3.4"},"reference-count":78,"publisher":"Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG)","issue":"5","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,5]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>OBJECTIVE<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) following decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) demonstrate considerable heterogeneity. Individualized prediction tools can provide valuable insights for shared decision-making. The authors aim to evaluate the feasibility of predicting short- and long-term PROMs, reoperations, and perioperative parameters by machine learning (ML) methods.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>METHODS<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Data were derived from a prospective registry. All patients had undergone single- or multilevel mini-open facet-sparing decompression for LSS. The prediction models were trained using various ML-based algorithms to predict the endpoints of interest. Models were selected by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). The endpoints were dichotomized by minimum clinically important difference (MCID) and included 6-week and 12-month numeric rating scales for back pain (NRS-BP) and leg pain (NRS-LP) severity and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), as well as prolonged surgery (&gt; 45 minutes), extended length of hospital stay (&gt; 28 hours), and reoperations.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>RESULTS<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>A total of 635 patients were included. The average age was 62 \u00b1 10 years, and 333 patients (52%) were male. At 6 weeks, MCID was seen in 63%, 76%, and 61% of patients for ODI, NRS-LP, and NRS-BP, respectively. At internal validation, the models predicted MCID in these variables with accuracies of 69%, 76%, and 85%, and with AUCs of 0.75, 0.79, and 0.92. At 12 months, 66%, 63%, and 51% of patients reported MCID; the observed accuracies were 62%, 74%, and 66%, with AUCs of 0.68, 0.72, and 0.79. Reoperations occurred in 60 patients (9.5%), of which 27 (4.3%) occurred at the index level. Overall and index-level reoperations were predicted with 69% and 63% accuracy, respectively, and with AUCs of 0.66 and 0.61. In 15%, a length of surgery greater than 45 minutes was observed and predicted with 78% accuracy and AUC of 0.54. Only 15% of patients were admitted to the hospital for longer than 28 hours. The developed ML-based model enabled prediction of extended hospital stay with an accuracy of 77% and AUC of 0.58.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>CONCLUSIONS<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Preoperative prediction of a range of clinically relevant endpoints in decompression surgery for LSS using ML is feasible, and may enable enhanced informed patient consent and personalized shared decision-making. Access to individualized preoperative predictive analytics for outcome and treatment risks may represent a further step in the evolution of surgical care for patients with LSS.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.3171\/2019.2.focus18723","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2019,5,3]],"date-time":"2019-05-03T18:49:13Z","timestamp":1556909353000},"page":"E5","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":90,"title":["Machine learning\u2013based preoperative predictive analytics for lumbar spinal stenosis"],"prefix":"10.3171","volume":"46","author":[{"given":"Alessandro","family":"Siccoli","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Neurosurgery, Bergman Clinics, Amsterdam;"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Marlies P.","family":"de Wispelaere","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Clinical Informatics, Bergman Clinics, Amsterdam;"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Marc L.","family":"Schr\u00f6der","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Neurosurgery, Bergman Clinics, Amsterdam;"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Victor E.","family":"Staartjes","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Neurosurgery, Bergman Clinics, Amsterdam;"},{"name":"Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Neurosurgery, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; and"},{"name":"Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neuroscience Centre, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Switzerland"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1754","reference":[{"key":"b1","series-title":"J Neurosurg Spine","first-page":"300","article-title":"Use of artificial neural networks to predict surgical satisfaction in patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis: clinical article","volume":"20","author":"Azimi P","year":"2014","unstructured":"Azimi P, Benzel EC, Shahzadi S, Azhari S, Mohammadi HR: Use of artificial neural networks to predict surgical satisfaction in patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis: clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine 20:300\u2013305, 201424438428"},{"issue":"4","key":"b2","series-title":"Neurosurg Focus","first-page":"E7","article-title":"Thirty-day readmission rates in spine surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"39","author":"Bernatz JT","year":"2015","unstructured":"Bernatz JT, Anderson PA: Thirty-day readmission rates in spine surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosurg Focus 39(4):E7, 201526424347"},{"key":"b3","series-title":"J Neurosurg Spine","first-page":"340","article-title":"Radiographic predictors of delayed instability following decompression without fusion for degenerative grade I lumbar spondylolisthesis","volume":"18","author":"Blumenthal C","year":"2013","unstructured":"Blumenthal C, Curran J, Benzel EC, Potter R, Magge SN, Harrington JF Jr, : Radiographic predictors of delayed instability following decompression without fusion for degenerative grade I lumbar spondylolisthesis. J Neurosurg Spine 18:340\u2013346, 2013"},{"key":"b4","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","first-page":"E425","article-title":"the influence of pre- and postoperative fear avoidance beliefs on postoperative pain and disability in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: analysis of the Lumbar Spinal Outcome Study (LSOS) data","volume":"42","author":"Burgstaller JM","year":"2017","unstructured":"Burgstaller JM, Wertli MM, Steurer J, Kessels AGH, Held U, Gramke HF: the influence of pre- and postoperative fear avoidance beliefs on postoperative pain and disability in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: analysis of the Lumbar Spinal Outcome Study (LSOS) data. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 42:E425\u2013E432, 201727509192"},{"key":"b5","series-title":"J Neurosurg Spine","first-page":"234","article-title":"Laminectomy alone versus fusion for grade 1 lumbar spondylolisthesis in 426 patients from the prospective Quality Outcomes Database","volume":"30","author":"Chan AK","year":"2018","unstructured":"Chan AK, Bisson EF, Bydon M, Glassman SD, Foley KT, Potts EA, : Laminectomy alone versus fusion for grade 1 lumbar spondylolisthesis in 426 patients from the prospective Quality Outcomes Database. J Neurosurg Spine 30:234\u2013241, 201830544348"},{"issue":"3S","key":"b6","series-title":"Neurosurgery","first-page":"S55","article-title":"Emerging techniques in degenerative thoracolumbar surgery","volume":"80","author":"Choma TJ","year":"2017","unstructured":"Choma TJ, Mroz TE, Goldstein CL, Arnold P, Shamji MF: Emerging techniques in degenerative thoracolumbar surgery. Neurosurgery 80(3S):S55\u2013S60, 201728350946"},{"key":"b7","series-title":"Eur Spine J","first-page":"1841","article-title":"Predictors of outcome after decompressive lumbar surgery and instrumented posterolateral fusion","volume":"19","author":"Cobo Soriano J","year":"2010","unstructured":"Cobo Soriano J, Sendino Revuelta M, Fabregate Fuente M, Cimarra D\u00edaz I, Mart\u00ednez Ure\u00f1a P, Deglan\u00e9 Meneses R: Predictors of outcome after decompressive lumbar surgery and instrumented posterolateral fusion. Eur Spine J 19:1841\u20131848, 201020135333"},{"key":"b8","series-title":"BMJ","first-page":"g7594","article-title":"Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement","volume":"350","author":"Collins GS","year":"2015","unstructured":"Collins GS, Reitsma JB, Altman DG, Moons KGM: Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement. BMJ 350:g7594, 2015"},{"key":"b9","series-title":"Spine J","first-page":"968","article-title":"Minimum clinically important difference in lumbar spine surgery patients: a choice of methods using the Oswestry Disability Index, Medical Outcomes Study Questionnaire Short Form 36, and pain scales","volume":"8","author":"Copay AG","year":"2008","unstructured":"Copay AG, Glassman SD, Subach BR, Berven S, Schuler TC, Carreon LY: Minimum clinically important difference in lumbar spine surgery patients: a choice of methods using the Oswestry Disability Index, Medical Outcomes Study Questionnaire Short Form 36, and pain scales. Spine J 8:968\u2013974, 200818201937"},{"issue":"5","key":"b10","series-title":"Neurosurg Focus","first-page":"E10","article-title":"Variability in the utility of predictive models in predicting patient-reported outcomes following spine surgery for degenerative conditions: a systematic review","volume":"45","author":"Dietz N","year":"2018","unstructured":"Dietz N, Sharma M, Alhourani A, Ugiliweneza B, Wang D, Nu\u00f1o MA, : Variability in the utility of predictive models in predicting patient-reported outcomes following spine surgery for degenerative conditions: a systematic review. Neurosurg Focus 45(5):E10, 201830453453"},{"key":"b11","series-title":"J Neurosurg Spine","first-page":"198","article-title":"Association between payer status and patient-reported outcomes in adult patients with lumbar spinal stenosis treated with decompression surgery","volume":"30","author":"Elsayed G","year":"2018","unstructured":"Elsayed G, McClugage SG, Erwood MS, Davis MC, Dup\u00e9p\u00e9 EB, Szerlip P, : Association between payer status and patient-reported outcomes in adult patients with lumbar spinal stenosis treated with decompression surgery. J Neurosurg Spine 30:198\u2013210, 201830485189"},{"key":"b12","series-title":"N Engl J Med","first-page":"1413","article-title":"A randomized, controlled trial of fusion surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis","volume":"374","author":"F\u00f6rsth P","year":"2016","unstructured":"F\u00f6rsth P, \u00d3lafsson G, Carlsson T, Frost A, Borgstr\u00f6m F, Fritzell P, : A randomized, controlled trial of fusion surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. N Engl J Med 374:1413\u20131423, 201627074066"},{"key":"b13","series-title":"J Neurosurg Spine","first-page":"267","article-title":"Prospective outcomes evaluation after decompression with or without instrumented fusion for lumbar stenosis and degenerative grade I spondylolisthesis","volume":"1","author":"Ghogawala Z","year":"2004","unstructured":"Ghogawala Z, Benzel EC, Amin-Hanjani S, Barker FG II, Harrington JF, Magge SN, : Prospective outcomes evaluation after decompression with or without instrumented fusion for lumbar stenosis and degenerative grade I spondylolisthesis. J Neurosurg Spine 1:267\u2013272, 200415478364"},{"key":"b14","series-title":"N Engl J Med","first-page":"1424","article-title":"Laminectomy plus fusion versus laminectomy alone for lumbar spondylolisthesis","volume":"374","author":"Ghogawala Z","year":"2016","unstructured":"Ghogawala Z, Dziura J, Butler WE, Dai F, Terrin N, Magge SN, : Laminectomy plus fusion versus laminectomy alone for lumbar spondylolisthesis. N Engl J Med 374:1424\u20131434, 201627074067"},{"key":"b15","series-title":"J Neurosurg Spine","first-page":"555","article-title":"The efficacy of lumbar discectomy and single-level fusion for spondylolisthesis: results from the NeuroPoint-SD registry: clinical article","volume":"19","author":"Ghogawala Z","year":"2013","unstructured":"Ghogawala Z, Shaffrey CI, Asher AL, Heary RF, Logvinenko T, Malhotra NR, : The efficacy of lumbar discectomy and single-level fusion for spondylolisthesis: results from the NeuroPoint-SD registry: clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine 19:555\u2013563, 201324010898"},{"issue":"4","key":"b16","series-title":"Neurosurg Focus","first-page":"E9","article-title":"Iatrogenic spondylolisthesis following laminectomy for degenerative lumbar stenosis: systematic review and current concepts","volume":"39","author":"Guha D","year":"2015","unstructured":"Guha D, Heary RF, Shamji MF: Iatrogenic spondylolisthesis following laminectomy for degenerative lumbar stenosis: systematic review and current concepts. Neurosurg Focus 39(4):E9, 201526424349"},{"key":"b17","series-title":"PLoS One","first-page":"e0207126","article-title":"Prognostic function to estimate the probability of meaningful clinical improvement after surgery\u2014results of a prospective multicenter observational cohort study on patients with lumbar spinal stenosis","volume":"13","author":"Held U","year":"2018","unstructured":"Held U, Burgstaller JM, Wertli MM, Pichierri G, Winklhofer S, Brunner F, : Prognostic function to estimate the probability of meaningful clinical improvement after surgery\u2014results of a prospective multicenter observational cohort study on patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. PLoS One 13:e0207126, 201830408081"},{"key":"b18","series-title":"J Neurosurg Spine","first-page":"1","article-title":"Machine learning modeling for predicting hospital readmission following lumbar laminectomy","volume":"1","author":"Kalagara S","year":"2018","unstructured":"Kalagara S, Eltorai AEM, Durand WM, DePasse JM, Daniels AH: Machine learning modeling for predicting hospital readmission following lumbar laminectomy. J Neurosurg Spine 1:1\u20139, 2018"},{"key":"b19","series-title":"J Allied Health","first-page":"88","article-title":"Predicting discharge placement and health care needs after lumbar spine laminectomy","volume":"43","author":"Kanaan SF","year":"2014","unstructured":"Kanaan SF, Yeh HW, Waitman RL, Burton DC, Arnold PM, Sharma NK: Predicting discharge placement and health care needs after lumbar spine laminectomy. J Allied Health 43:88\u201397, 201424925036"},{"issue":"5","key":"b20","series-title":"Neurosurg Focus","first-page":"E6","article-title":"Development of machine learning algorithms for prediction of discharge disposition after elective inpatient surgery for lumbar degenerative disc disorders","volume":"45","author":"Karhade AV","year":"2018","unstructured":"Karhade AV, Ogink P, Thio Q, Broekman M, Cha T, Gormley WB, : Development of machine learning algorithms for prediction of discharge disposition after elective inpatient surgery for lumbar degenerative disc disorders. Neurosurg Focus 45(5):E6, 201830453463"},{"key":"b21","series-title":"Spine J","first-page":"41","article-title":"Lumbar spinal stenosis: comparison of surgical practice variation and clinical outcome in three national spine registries","volume":"19","author":"L\u00f8nne G","year":"2019","unstructured":"L\u00f8nne G, Fritzell P, H\u00e4gg O, Nordvall D, Gerdhem P, Lagerb\u00e4ck T, : Lumbar spinal stenosis: comparison of surgical practice variation and clinical outcome in three national spine registries. Spine J 19:41\u201349, 201929792994"},{"key":"b22","series-title":"Clin Neurol Neurosurg","first-page":"77","article-title":"Variation in selection criteria and approaches to surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis among patients treated in Boston and Norway","volume":"156","author":"L\u00f8nne G","year":"2017","unstructured":"L\u00f8nne G, Schoenfeld AJ, Cha TD, Nygaard \u00d8P, Zwart JAH, Solberg T: Variation in selection criteria and approaches to surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis among patients treated in Boston and Norway. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 156:77\u201382, 201728359979"},{"key":"b23","series-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev","first-page":"CD012421","article-title":"Surgical options for lumbar spinal stenosis","volume":"11","author":"Machado GC","year":"2016","unstructured":"Machado GC, Ferreira PH, Yoo RI, Harris IA, Pinheiro MB, Koes BW, : Surgical options for lumbar spinal stenosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 11:CD012421, 201627801521"},{"issue":"6","key":"b24","series-title":"Neurosurg Focus","first-page":"E3","article-title":"Cost-effectiveness of lumbar discectomy and single-level fusion for spondylolisthesis: experience with the NeuroPoint-SD registry","volume":"36","author":"Mummaneni PV","year":"2014","unstructured":"Mummaneni PV, Whitmore RG, Curran JN, Ziewacz JE, Wadhwa R, Shaffrey CI, : Cost-effectiveness of lumbar discectomy and single-level fusion for spondylolisthesis: experience with the NeuroPoint-SD registry. Neurosurg Focus 36(6):E3, 201424881635"},{"key":"b25","series-title":"N Engl J Med","first-page":"1216","article-title":"Predicting the future\u2014big data, machine learning, and clinical medicine","volume":"375","author":"Obermeyer Z","year":"2016","unstructured":"Obermeyer Z, Emanuel EJ: Predicting the future\u2014big data, machine learning, and clinical medicine. N Engl J Med 375:1216\u20131219, 201627682033"},{"key":"b26","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","first-page":"90","article-title":"Interpreting change scores for pain and functional status in low back pain: towards international consensus regarding minimal important change","volume":"33","author":"Ostelo RWJG","year":"2008","unstructured":"Ostelo RWJG, Deyo RA, Stratford P, Waddell G, Croft P, Von Korff M, : Interpreting change scores for pain and functional status in low back pain: towards international consensus regarding minimal important change. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33:90\u201394, 200818165753"},{"key":"b27","series-title":"J Neurosurg Spine","first-page":"169","article-title":"Trends in isolated lumbar spinal stenosis surgery among working US adults aged 40\u201364 years","volume":"29","author":"Raad M","year":"2010\u20132014","unstructured":"Raad M, Donaldson CJ, El Dafrawy MH, Sciubba DM, Riley LH, Neuman BJ, : Trends in isolated lumbar spinal stenosis surgery among working US adults aged 40\u201364 years, 2010\u20132014. J Neurosurg Spine 29:169\u2013175, 2018"},{"key":"b28","series-title":"arXiv","article-title":"\u201cWhy should I trust you?\u201d: Explaining the predictions of any classifier","author":"Ribeiro MT","unstructured":"Ribeiro MT, Singh S, Guestrin C: \u201cWhy should I trust you?\u201d: Explaining the predictions of any classifier. arXiv:1602.04938, 2016"},{"issue":"5","key":"b29","series-title":"Neurosurg Focus","first-page":"E11","article-title":"Development of a validated computer-based preoperative predictive model for pseudarthrosis with 91% accuracy in 336 adult spinal deformity patients","volume":"45","author":"Scheer JK","year":"2018","unstructured":"Scheer JK, Oh T, Smith JS, Shaffrey CI, Daniels AH, Sciubba DM, : Development of a validated computer-based preoperative predictive model for pseudarthrosis with 91% accuracy in 336 adult spinal deformity patients. Neurosurg Focus 45(5):E11, 201830453452"},{"key":"b30","series-title":"Spine J","first-page":"65","article-title":"Are patient-reported outcome measures biased by method of follow-up? Evaluating paper-based and digital follow-up after lumbar fusion surgery","volume":"19","author":"Schr\u00f6der ML","year":"2019","unstructured":"Schr\u00f6der ML, de Wispelaere MP, Staartjes VE: Are patient-reported outcome measures biased by method of follow-up? Evaluating paper-based and digital follow-up after lumbar fusion surgery. Spine J 19:65\u201370, 201929730459"},{"key":"b31","series-title":"Neurosurgery","first-page":"181","article-title":"Natural and artificial intelligence in neurosurgery: a systematic review","volume":"83","author":"Senders JT","year":"2018","unstructured":"Senders JT, Arnaout O, Karhade AV, Dasenbrock HH, Gormley WB, Broekman ML, : Natural and artificial intelligence in neurosurgery: a systematic review. Neurosurgery 83:181\u2013192, 201828945910"},{"key":"b32","series-title":"Acta Neurochir (Wien)","first-page":"29","article-title":"An introduction and overview of machine learning in neurosurgical care","volume":"160","author":"Senders JT","year":"2018","unstructured":"Senders JT, Zaki MM, Karhade AV, Chang B, Gormley WB, Broekman ML, : An introduction and overview of machine learning in neurosurgical care. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 160:29\u201338, 201829134342"},{"key":"b33","series-title":"Spine J","first-page":"638","article-title":"Outcome of decompression with and without fusion in spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis in relation to preoperative pain pattern: a register study of 1,624 patients","volume":"15","author":"Sigmundsson FG","year":"2015","unstructured":"Sigmundsson FG, J\u00f6nsson B, Str\u00f6mqvist B: Outcome of decompression with and without fusion in spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis in relation to preoperative pain pattern: a register study of 1,624 patients. Spine J 15:638\u2013646, 201525450653"},{"key":"b34","series-title":"Spine J","article-title":"Deep learning-based preoperative predictive analytics for patient-reported outcomes following lumbar diskectomy: feasibility of center-specific modeling","author":"Staartjes VE","unstructured":"Staartjes VE, de Wispelaere MP, Vandertop WP, Schr\u00f6der ML: Deep learning-based preoperative predictive analytics for patient-reported outcomes following lumbar diskectomy: feasibility of center-specific modeling. Spine J [epub ahead of print], 201830453080"},{"key":"b35","series-title":"J Neurosurg Spine","first-page":"611","article-title":"Class imbalance in machine learning for neurosurgical outcome prediction: are our models valid?","volume":"29","author":"Staartjes VE","year":"2018","unstructured":"Staartjes VE, Schr\u00f6der ML: Class imbalance in machine learning for neurosurgical outcome prediction: are our models valid? J Neurosurg Spine 29:611\u2013612, 2018 (Letter)30117796"},{"key":"b36","series-title":"World Neurosurg","first-page":"e355","article-title":"Effectiveness of a decision-making protocol for the surgical treatment of lumbar stenosis with grade 1 degenerative spondylolisthesis","volume":"110","author":"Staartjes VE","year":"2018","unstructured":"Staartjes VE, Schr\u00f6der ML: Effectiveness of a decision-making protocol for the surgical treatment of lumbar stenosis with grade 1 degenerative spondylolisthesis. World Neurosurg 110:e355\u2013e361, 201829133000"},{"issue":"5","key":"b37","series-title":"Neurosurg Focus","first-page":"E12","article-title":"Utility of deep neural networks in predicting gross-total resection after transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenoma: a pilot study","volume":"45","author":"Staartjes VE","year":"2018","unstructured":"Staartjes VE, Serra C, Muscas G, Maldaner N, Akeret K, van Niftrik CHB, : Utility of deep neural networks in predicting gross-total resection after transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenoma: a pilot study. Neurosurg Focus 45(5):E12, 201830453454"},{"key":"b38","series-title":"JAMA Surg","first-page":"643","article-title":"Value of adding predictive clinical decision tools to spine surgery","volume":"153","author":"Steinmetz MP","year":"2018","unstructured":"Steinmetz MP, Mroz T: Value of adding predictive clinical decision tools to spine surgery. JAMA Surg 153:643, 201829516083"},{"issue":"3","key":"b39","series-title":"J Stat Softw","first-page":"1","article-title":"mice: multivariate imputation by chained equations in R","volume":"45","author":"van Buuren S","year":"2011","unstructured":"van Buuren S, Groothuis-Oudshoorn CGM: mice: multivariate imputation by chained equations in R. J Stat Softw 45(3):1\u201367, 2011"},{"key":"b1","series-title":"J Neurosurg Spine","first-page":"300","article-title":"Use of artificial neural networks to predict surgical satisfaction in patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis: clinical article","volume":"20","author":"Azimi P","year":"2014","unstructured":"Azimi P, Benzel EC, Shahzadi S, Azhari S, Mohammadi HR: Use of artificial neural networks to predict surgical satisfaction in patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis: clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine 20:300\u2013305, 201424438428"},{"issue":"4","key":"b2","series-title":"Neurosurg Focus","first-page":"E7","article-title":"Thirty-day readmission rates in spine surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"39","author":"Bernatz JT","year":"2015","unstructured":"Bernatz JT, Anderson PA: Thirty-day readmission rates in spine surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosurg Focus 39(4):E7, 201526424347"},{"key":"b3","series-title":"J Neurosurg Spine","first-page":"340","article-title":"Radiographic predictors of delayed instability following decompression without fusion for degenerative grade I lumbar spondylolisthesis","volume":"18","author":"Blumenthal C","year":"2013","unstructured":"Blumenthal C, Curran J, Benzel EC, Potter R, Magge SN, Harrington JF Jr, : Radiographic predictors of delayed instability following decompression without fusion for degenerative grade I lumbar spondylolisthesis. J Neurosurg Spine 18:340\u2013346, 2013"},{"key":"b4","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","first-page":"E425","article-title":"the influence of pre- and postoperative fear avoidance beliefs on postoperative pain and disability in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: analysis of the Lumbar Spinal Outcome Study (LSOS) data","volume":"42","author":"Burgstaller JM","year":"2017","unstructured":"Burgstaller JM, Wertli MM, Steurer J, Kessels AGH, Held U, Gramke HF: the influence of pre- and postoperative fear avoidance beliefs on postoperative pain and disability in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: analysis of the Lumbar Spinal Outcome Study (LSOS) data. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 42:E425\u2013E432, 201727509192"},{"key":"b5","series-title":"J Neurosurg Spine","first-page":"234","article-title":"Laminectomy alone versus fusion for grade 1 lumbar spondylolisthesis in 426 patients from the prospective Quality Outcomes Database","volume":"30","author":"Chan AK","year":"2018","unstructured":"Chan AK, Bisson EF, Bydon M, Glassman SD, Foley KT, Potts EA, : Laminectomy alone versus fusion for grade 1 lumbar spondylolisthesis in 426 patients from the prospective Quality Outcomes Database. J Neurosurg Spine 30:234\u2013241, 201830544348"},{"issue":"3S","key":"b6","series-title":"Neurosurgery","first-page":"S55","article-title":"Emerging techniques in degenerative thoracolumbar surgery","volume":"80","author":"Choma TJ","year":"2017","unstructured":"Choma TJ, Mroz TE, Goldstein CL, Arnold P, Shamji MF: Emerging techniques in degenerative thoracolumbar surgery. Neurosurgery 80(3S):S55\u2013S60, 201728350946"},{"key":"b7","series-title":"Eur Spine J","first-page":"1841","article-title":"Predictors of outcome after decompressive lumbar surgery and instrumented posterolateral fusion","volume":"19","author":"Cobo Soriano J","year":"2010","unstructured":"Cobo Soriano J, Sendino Revuelta M, Fabregate Fuente M, Cimarra D\u00edaz I, Mart\u00ednez Ure\u00f1a P, Deglan\u00e9 Meneses R: Predictors of outcome after decompressive lumbar surgery and instrumented posterolateral fusion. Eur Spine J 19:1841\u20131848, 201020135333"},{"key":"b8","series-title":"BMJ","first-page":"g7594","article-title":"Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement","volume":"350","author":"Collins GS","year":"2015","unstructured":"Collins GS, Reitsma JB, Altman DG, Moons KGM: Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement. BMJ 350:g7594, 2015"},{"key":"b9","series-title":"Spine J","first-page":"968","article-title":"Minimum clinically important difference in lumbar spine surgery patients: a choice of methods using the Oswestry Disability Index, Medical Outcomes Study Questionnaire Short Form 36, and pain scales","volume":"8","author":"Copay AG","year":"2008","unstructured":"Copay AG, Glassman SD, Subach BR, Berven S, Schuler TC, Carreon LY: Minimum clinically important difference in lumbar spine surgery patients: a choice of methods using the Oswestry Disability Index, Medical Outcomes Study Questionnaire Short Form 36, and pain scales. Spine J 8:968\u2013974, 200818201937"},{"issue":"5","key":"b10","series-title":"Neurosurg Focus","first-page":"E10","article-title":"Variability in the utility of predictive models in predicting patient-reported outcomes following spine surgery for degenerative conditions: a systematic review","volume":"45","author":"Dietz N","year":"2018","unstructured":"Dietz N, Sharma M, Alhourani A, Ugiliweneza B, Wang D, Nu\u00f1o MA, : Variability in the utility of predictive models in predicting patient-reported outcomes following spine surgery for degenerative conditions: a systematic review. Neurosurg Focus 45(5):E10, 201830453453"},{"key":"b11","series-title":"J Neurosurg Spine","first-page":"198","article-title":"Association between payer status and patient-reported outcomes in adult patients with lumbar spinal stenosis treated with decompression surgery","volume":"30","author":"Elsayed G","year":"2018","unstructured":"Elsayed G, McClugage SG, Erwood MS, Davis MC, Dup\u00e9p\u00e9 EB, Szerlip P, : Association between payer status and patient-reported outcomes in adult patients with lumbar spinal stenosis treated with decompression surgery. J Neurosurg Spine 30:198\u2013210, 201830485189"},{"key":"b12","series-title":"N Engl J Med","first-page":"1413","article-title":"A randomized, controlled trial of fusion surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis","volume":"374","author":"F\u00f6rsth P","year":"2016","unstructured":"F\u00f6rsth P, \u00d3lafsson G, Carlsson T, Frost A, Borgstr\u00f6m F, Fritzell P, : A randomized, controlled trial of fusion surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. N Engl J Med 374:1413\u20131423, 201627074066"},{"key":"b13","series-title":"J Neurosurg Spine","first-page":"267","article-title":"Prospective outcomes evaluation after decompression with or without instrumented fusion for lumbar stenosis and degenerative grade I spondylolisthesis","volume":"1","author":"Ghogawala Z","year":"2004","unstructured":"Ghogawala Z, Benzel EC, Amin-Hanjani S, Barker FG II, Harrington JF, Magge SN, : Prospective outcomes evaluation after decompression with or without instrumented fusion for lumbar stenosis and degenerative grade I spondylolisthesis. J Neurosurg Spine 1:267\u2013272, 200415478364"},{"key":"b14","series-title":"N Engl J Med","first-page":"1424","article-title":"Laminectomy plus fusion versus laminectomy alone for lumbar spondylolisthesis","volume":"374","author":"Ghogawala Z","year":"2016","unstructured":"Ghogawala Z, Dziura J, Butler WE, Dai F, Terrin N, Magge SN, : Laminectomy plus fusion versus laminectomy alone for lumbar spondylolisthesis. N Engl J Med 374:1424\u20131434, 201627074067"},{"key":"b15","series-title":"J Neurosurg Spine","first-page":"555","article-title":"The efficacy of lumbar discectomy and single-level fusion for spondylolisthesis: results from the NeuroPoint-SD registry: clinical article","volume":"19","author":"Ghogawala Z","year":"2013","unstructured":"Ghogawala Z, Shaffrey CI, Asher AL, Heary RF, Logvinenko T, Malhotra NR, : The efficacy of lumbar discectomy and single-level fusion for spondylolisthesis: results from the NeuroPoint-SD registry: clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine 19:555\u2013563, 201324010898"},{"issue":"4","key":"b16","series-title":"Neurosurg Focus","first-page":"E9","article-title":"Iatrogenic spondylolisthesis following laminectomy for degenerative lumbar stenosis: systematic review and current concepts","volume":"39","author":"Guha D","year":"2015","unstructured":"Guha D, Heary RF, Shamji MF: Iatrogenic spondylolisthesis following laminectomy for degenerative lumbar stenosis: systematic review and current concepts. Neurosurg Focus 39(4):E9, 201526424349"},{"key":"b17","series-title":"PLoS One","first-page":"e0207126","article-title":"Prognostic function to estimate the probability of meaningful clinical improvement after surgery\u2014results of a prospective multicenter observational cohort study on patients with lumbar spinal stenosis","volume":"13","author":"Held U","year":"2018","unstructured":"Held U, Burgstaller JM, Wertli MM, Pichierri G, Winklhofer S, Brunner F, : Prognostic function to estimate the probability of meaningful clinical improvement after surgery\u2014results of a prospective multicenter observational cohort study on patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. PLoS One 13:e0207126, 201830408081"},{"key":"b18","series-title":"J Neurosurg Spine","first-page":"1","article-title":"Machine learning modeling for predicting hospital readmission following lumbar laminectomy","volume":"1","author":"Kalagara S","year":"2018","unstructured":"Kalagara S, Eltorai AEM, Durand WM, DePasse JM, Daniels AH: Machine learning modeling for predicting hospital readmission following lumbar laminectomy. J Neurosurg Spine 1:1\u20139, 2018"},{"key":"b19","series-title":"J Allied Health","first-page":"88","article-title":"Predicting discharge placement and health care needs after lumbar spine laminectomy","volume":"43","author":"Kanaan SF","year":"2014","unstructured":"Kanaan SF, Yeh HW, Waitman RL, Burton DC, Arnold PM, Sharma NK: Predicting discharge placement and health care needs after lumbar spine laminectomy. J Allied Health 43:88\u201397, 201424925036"},{"issue":"5","key":"b20","series-title":"Neurosurg Focus","first-page":"E6","article-title":"Development of machine learning algorithms for prediction of discharge disposition after elective inpatient surgery for lumbar degenerative disc disorders","volume":"45","author":"Karhade AV","year":"2018","unstructured":"Karhade AV, Ogink P, Thio Q, Broekman M, Cha T, Gormley WB, : Development of machine learning algorithms for prediction of discharge disposition after elective inpatient surgery for lumbar degenerative disc disorders. Neurosurg Focus 45(5):E6, 201830453463"},{"key":"b21","series-title":"Spine J","first-page":"41","article-title":"Lumbar spinal stenosis: comparison of surgical practice variation and clinical outcome in three national spine registries","volume":"19","author":"L\u00f8nne G","year":"2019","unstructured":"L\u00f8nne G, Fritzell P, H\u00e4gg O, Nordvall D, Gerdhem P, Lagerb\u00e4ck T, : Lumbar spinal stenosis: comparison of surgical practice variation and clinical outcome in three national spine registries. Spine J 19:41\u201349, 201929792994"},{"key":"b22","series-title":"Clin Neurol Neurosurg","first-page":"77","article-title":"Variation in selection criteria and approaches to surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis among patients treated in Boston and Norway","volume":"156","author":"L\u00f8nne G","year":"2017","unstructured":"L\u00f8nne G, Schoenfeld AJ, Cha TD, Nygaard \u00d8P, Zwart JAH, Solberg T: Variation in selection criteria and approaches to surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis among patients treated in Boston and Norway. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 156:77\u201382, 201728359979"},{"key":"b23","series-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev","first-page":"CD012421","article-title":"Surgical options for lumbar spinal stenosis","volume":"11","author":"Machado GC","year":"2016","unstructured":"Machado GC, Ferreira PH, Yoo RI, Harris IA, Pinheiro MB, Koes BW, : Surgical options for lumbar spinal stenosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 11:CD012421, 201627801521"},{"issue":"6","key":"b24","series-title":"Neurosurg Focus","first-page":"E3","article-title":"Cost-effectiveness of lumbar discectomy and single-level fusion for spondylolisthesis: experience with the NeuroPoint-SD registry","volume":"36","author":"Mummaneni PV","year":"2014","unstructured":"Mummaneni PV, Whitmore RG, Curran JN, Ziewacz JE, Wadhwa R, Shaffrey CI, : Cost-effectiveness of lumbar discectomy and single-level fusion for spondylolisthesis: experience with the NeuroPoint-SD registry. Neurosurg Focus 36(6):E3, 201424881635"},{"key":"b25","series-title":"N Engl J Med","first-page":"1216","article-title":"Predicting the future\u2014big data, machine learning, and clinical medicine","volume":"375","author":"Obermeyer Z","year":"2016","unstructured":"Obermeyer Z, Emanuel EJ: Predicting the future\u2014big data, machine learning, and clinical medicine. N Engl J Med 375:1216\u20131219, 201627682033"},{"key":"b26","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","first-page":"90","article-title":"Interpreting change scores for pain and functional status in low back pain: towards international consensus regarding minimal important change","volume":"33","author":"Ostelo RWJG","year":"2008","unstructured":"Ostelo RWJG, Deyo RA, Stratford P, Waddell G, Croft P, Von Korff M, : Interpreting change scores for pain and functional status in low back pain: towards international consensus regarding minimal important change. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33:90\u201394, 200818165753"},{"key":"b27","series-title":"J Neurosurg Spine","first-page":"169","article-title":"Trends in isolated lumbar spinal stenosis surgery among working US adults aged 40\u201364 years","volume":"29","author":"Raad M","year":"2010\u20132014","unstructured":"Raad M, Donaldson CJ, El Dafrawy MH, Sciubba DM, Riley LH, Neuman BJ, : Trends in isolated lumbar spinal stenosis surgery among working US adults aged 40\u201364 years, 2010\u20132014. J Neurosurg Spine 29:169\u2013175, 2018"},{"key":"b28","series-title":"arXiv","article-title":"\u201cWhy should I trust you?\u201d: Explaining the predictions of any classifier","author":"Ribeiro MT","unstructured":"Ribeiro MT, Singh S, Guestrin C: \u201cWhy should I trust you?\u201d: Explaining the predictions of any classifier. arXiv:1602.04938, 2016"},{"issue":"5","key":"b29","series-title":"Neurosurg Focus","first-page":"E11","article-title":"Development of a validated computer-based preoperative predictive model for pseudarthrosis with 91% accuracy in 336 adult spinal deformity patients","volume":"45","author":"Scheer JK","year":"2018","unstructured":"Scheer JK, Oh T, Smith JS, Shaffrey CI, Daniels AH, Sciubba DM, : Development of a validated computer-based preoperative predictive model for pseudarthrosis with 91% accuracy in 336 adult spinal deformity patients. Neurosurg Focus 45(5):E11, 201830453452"},{"key":"b30","series-title":"Spine J","first-page":"65","article-title":"Are patient-reported outcome measures biased by method of follow-up? Evaluating paper-based and digital follow-up after lumbar fusion surgery","volume":"19","author":"Schr\u00f6der ML","year":"2019","unstructured":"Schr\u00f6der ML, de Wispelaere MP, Staartjes VE: Are patient-reported outcome measures biased by method of follow-up? Evaluating paper-based and digital follow-up after lumbar fusion surgery. Spine J 19:65\u201370, 201929730459"},{"key":"b31","series-title":"Neurosurgery","first-page":"181","article-title":"Natural and artificial intelligence in neurosurgery: a systematic review","volume":"83","author":"Senders JT","year":"2018","unstructured":"Senders JT, Arnaout O, Karhade AV, Dasenbrock HH, Gormley WB, Broekman ML, : Natural and artificial intelligence in neurosurgery: a systematic review. Neurosurgery 83:181\u2013192, 201828945910"},{"key":"b32","series-title":"Acta Neurochir (Wien)","first-page":"29","article-title":"An introduction and overview of machine learning in neurosurgical care","volume":"160","author":"Senders JT","year":"2018","unstructured":"Senders JT, Zaki MM, Karhade AV, Chang B, Gormley WB, Broekman ML, : An introduction and overview of machine learning in neurosurgical care. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 160:29\u201338, 201829134342"},{"key":"b33","series-title":"Spine J","first-page":"638","article-title":"Outcome of decompression with and without fusion in spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis in relation to preoperative pain pattern: a register study of 1,624 patients","volume":"15","author":"Sigmundsson FG","year":"2015","unstructured":"Sigmundsson FG, J\u00f6nsson B, Str\u00f6mqvist B: Outcome of decompression with and without fusion in spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis in relation to preoperative pain pattern: a register study of 1,624 patients. Spine J 15:638\u2013646, 201525450653"},{"key":"b34","series-title":"Spine J","article-title":"Deep learning-based preoperative predictive analytics for patient-reported outcomes following lumbar diskectomy: feasibility of center-specific modeling","author":"Staartjes VE","unstructured":"Staartjes VE, de Wispelaere MP, Vandertop WP, Schr\u00f6der ML: Deep learning-based preoperative predictive analytics for patient-reported outcomes following lumbar diskectomy: feasibility of center-specific modeling. Spine J [epub ahead of print], 201830453080"},{"key":"b35","series-title":"J Neurosurg Spine","first-page":"611","article-title":"Class imbalance in machine learning for neurosurgical outcome prediction: are our models valid?","volume":"29","author":"Staartjes VE","year":"2018","unstructured":"Staartjes VE, Schr\u00f6der ML: Class imbalance in machine learning for neurosurgical outcome prediction: are our models valid? J Neurosurg Spine 29:611\u2013612, 2018 (Letter)30117796"},{"key":"b36","series-title":"World Neurosurg","first-page":"e355","article-title":"Effectiveness of a decision-making protocol for the surgical treatment of lumbar stenosis with grade 1 degenerative spondylolisthesis","volume":"110","author":"Staartjes VE","year":"2018","unstructured":"Staartjes VE, Schr\u00f6der ML: Effectiveness of a decision-making protocol for the surgical treatment of lumbar stenosis with grade 1 degenerative spondylolisthesis. World Neurosurg 110:e355\u2013e361, 201829133000"},{"issue":"5","key":"b37","series-title":"Neurosurg Focus","first-page":"E12","article-title":"Utility of deep neural networks in predicting gross-total resection after transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenoma: a pilot study","volume":"45","author":"Staartjes VE","year":"2018","unstructured":"Staartjes VE, Serra C, Muscas G, Maldaner N, Akeret K, van Niftrik CHB, : Utility of deep neural networks in predicting gross-total resection after transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenoma: a pilot study. Neurosurg Focus 45(5):E12, 201830453454"},{"key":"b38","series-title":"JAMA Surg","first-page":"643","article-title":"Value of adding predictive clinical decision tools to spine surgery","volume":"153","author":"Steinmetz MP","year":"2018","unstructured":"Steinmetz MP, Mroz T: Value of adding predictive clinical decision tools to spine surgery. JAMA Surg 153:643, 201829516083"},{"issue":"3","key":"b39","series-title":"J Stat Softw","first-page":"1","article-title":"mice: multivariate imputation by chained equations in R","volume":"45","author":"van Buuren S","year":"2011","unstructured":"van Buuren S, Groothuis-Oudshoorn CGM: mice: multivariate imputation by chained equations in R. J Stat Softw 45(3):1\u201367, 2011"}],"container-title":["Neurosurgical Focus"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/thejns.org\/view\/journals\/neurosurg-focus\/46\/5\/article-pE5.xml","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/thejns.org\/downloadpdf\/journals\/neurosurg-focus\/46\/5\/article-pE5.xml","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"syndication"},{"URL":"https:\/\/thejns.org\/downloadpdf\/journals\/neurosurg-focus\/46\/5\/article-pE5.xml","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,30]],"date-time":"2026-05-30T08:43:15Z","timestamp":1780130595000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/thejns.org\/view\/journals\/neurosurg-focus\/46\/5\/article-pE5.xml"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2019,5]]},"references-count":78,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5"},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3171\/2019.2.focus18723","relation":{},"ISSN":["1092-0684"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1092-0684","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2019,5]]}}}