{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,8]],"date-time":"2026-07-08T05:39:51Z","timestamp":1783489191150,"version":"3.55.0"},"reference-count":50,"publisher":"Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG)","issue":"3","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,9]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>OBJECTIVE<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical results of revision interbody fusion surgery between lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) and posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) or transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) with propensity score (PS) adjustments and to investigate the efficacy of indirect decompression with LLIF in previously decompressed segments on the basis of radiological assessment.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>METHODS<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>A retrospective study of patients who underwent revision surgery for recurrence of neurological symptoms after posterior decompression surgery was performed. Postoperative complications and operative factors were evaluated and compared between LLIF and PLIF\/TLIF. Moreover, postoperative improvement in cross-sectional areas (CSAs) in the spinal canal and intervertebral foramen was evaluated in LLIF cases.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>RESULTS<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>A total of 56 patients (21 and 35 cases of LLIF and PLIF\/TLIF, respectively) were included. In the univariate analysis, the LLIF group had significantly more endplate injuries (p = 0.03) and neurological deficits (p = 0.042), whereas the PLIF\/TLIF group demonstrated significantly more dural tears (p &lt; 0.001), surgical site infections (SSIs) (p = 0.02), and estimated blood loss (EBL) (p &lt; 0.001). After PS adjustments, the LLIF group still showed significantly more endplate injuries (p = 0.03), and the PLIF\/TLIF group demonstrated significantly more dural tears (p &lt; 0.001), EBL (p &lt; 0.001), and operating time (p = 0.04). The PLIF\/TLIF group showed a trend toward a higher incidence of SSI (p = 0.10). There was no statistically significant difference regarding improvement in the Japanese Orthopaedic Association scores between the 2 surgical procedures (p = 0.77). The CSAs in the spinal canal and foramen were both significantly improved (p &lt; 0.001).<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>CONCLUSIONS<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>LLIF is a safe, effective, and less invasive procedure with acceptable complication rates for revision surgery for previously decompressed segments. Therefore, LLIF can be an alternative to PLIF\/TLIF for restenosis after posterior decompression surgery.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.3171\/2020.6.focus20361","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,9,1]],"date-time":"2020-09-01T06:32:03Z","timestamp":1598941923000},"page":"E11","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":20,"title":["Lateral lumbar interbody fusion in revision surgery for restenosis after posterior decompression"],"prefix":"10.3171","volume":"49","author":[{"given":"Yoshifumi","family":"Kudo","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Showa University, Tokyo;"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ichiro","family":"Okano","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Showa University, Tokyo;"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Tomoaki","family":"Toyone","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Showa University, Tokyo;"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Akira","family":"Matsuoka","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Showa University, Tokyo;"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Hiroshi","family":"Maruyama","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Showa University, Tokyo;"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ryo","family":"Yamamura","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Showa University, Tokyo;"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Koji","family":"Ishikawa","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Showa University, Tokyo;"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Chikara","family":"Hayakawa","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Showa University, Tokyo;"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Soji","family":"Tani","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Showa University, Tokyo;"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Masaya","family":"Sekimizu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Showa University, Tokyo;"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Yushi","family":"Hoshino","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Showa University, Tokyo;"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Tomoyuki","family":"Ozawa","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Showa University, Tokyo;"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Toshiyuki","family":"Shirahata","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Showa University Koto Toyosu Hospital, Tokyo; and"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Masayori","family":"Fujita","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Showa University Koto Toyosu Hospital, Tokyo; and"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Yusuke","family":"Oshita","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Haruka","family":"Emori","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Hiroaki","family":"Omata","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Katsunori","family":"Inagaki","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Showa University, Tokyo;"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1754","reference":[{"issue":"1","key":"b1","series-title":"J Neurosurg Spine","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"44","DOI":"10.3171\/2011.9.SPINE11373","article-title":"Perioperative surgical complications of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a single-center experience","volume":"16","author":"Tormenti MJ","year":"2012","unstructured":"Tormenti MJ, Maserati MB, Bonfield CM,  Perioperative surgical complications of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a single-center experience. J Neurosurg Spine. 2012;16(1):44\u201350.2199938910.3171\/2011.9.SPINE11373"},{"issue":"3","key":"b2","series-title":"J Spinal Disord Tech","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"207","DOI":"10.1097\/BSD.0b013e318169026f","article-title":"Minimally invasive interbody fusion for revision lumbar surgery: technical feasibility and safety","volume":"22","author":"Selznick LA","year":"2009","unstructured":"Selznick LA, Shamji MF, Isaacs RE. Minimally invasive interbody fusion for revision lumbar surgery: technical feasibility and safety. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2009;22(3):207\u2013213.1941202410.1097\/BSD.0b013e318169026f"},{"issue":"3","key":"b3","series-title":"J Neurosurg Spine","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"260","DOI":"10.3171\/2012.11.SPINE12558","article-title":"Perioperative complications in patients undergoing open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion as a revision surgery","volume":"18","author":"Khan IS","year":"2013","unstructured":"Khan IS, Sonig A, Thakur JD,  Perioperative complications in patients undergoing open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion as a revision surgery. J Neurosurg Spine. 2013;18(3):260\u2013264.2325954010.3171\/2012.11.SPINE12558"},{"key":"b4","series-title":"Biomed Res Int","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"919248","DOI":"10.1155\/2014\/919248","article-title":"Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with unilateral pedicle screw fixation: comparison between primary and revision surgery","volume":"2014","author":"Kang MS","year":"2014","unstructured":"Kang MS, Park JY, Kim KH,  Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with unilateral pedicle screw fixation: comparison between primary and revision surgery. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:919248.2494948310.1155\/2014\/919248"},{"issue":"4","key":"b5","series-title":"Spine J","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"435","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2005.08.012","article-title":"Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion (XLIF): a novel surgical technique for anterior lumbar interbody fusion","volume":"6","author":"Ozgur BM","year":"2006","unstructured":"Ozgur BM, Aryan HE, Pimenta L, Taylor WR. Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion (XLIF): a novel surgical technique for anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine J. 2006;6(4):435\u2013443.1682505210.1016\/j.spinee.2005.08.012"},{"issue":"suppl 3","key":"b6","series-title":"Eur Spine J","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"339","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-015-3807-3","article-title":"Clinical results and limitations of indirect decompression in spinal stenosis with laterally implanted interbody cages: results from a prospective cohort study","volume":"24","author":"Malham GM","year":"2015","unstructured":"Malham GM, Parker RM, Goss B, Blecher CM. Clinical results and limitations of indirect decompression in spinal stenosis with laterally implanted interbody cages: results from a prospective cohort study. Eur Spine J. 2015;24(suppl 3):339\u2013345.10.1007\/s00586-015-3807-325681117"},{"issue":"26)(suppl","key":"b7","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S331","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3182022db0","article-title":"A radiographic assessment of the ability of the extreme lateral interbody fusion procedure to indirectly decompress the neural elements","volume":"35","author":"Oliveira L","year":"2010","unstructured":"Oliveira L, Marchi L, Coutinho E, Pimenta L. A radiographic assessment of the ability of the extreme lateral interbody fusion procedure to indirectly decompress the neural elements. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010;35(26)(suppl):S331\u2013S337.10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3182022db0"},{"issue":"3","key":"b8","series-title":"Eur Spine J","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"671","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-015-4170-0","article-title":"Radiographic evaluation of indirect decompression of mini-open anterior retroperitoneal lumbar interbody fusion: oblique lateral interbody fusion for degenerated lumbar spondylolisthesis","volume":"26","author":"Sato J","year":"2017","unstructured":"Sato J, Ohtori S, Orita S,  Radiographic evaluation of indirect decompression of mini-open anterior retroperitoneal lumbar interbody fusion: oblique lateral interbody fusion for degenerated lumbar spondylolisthesis. Eur Spine J. 2017;26(3):671\u2013678.2624590610.1007\/s00586-015-4170-0"},{"issue":"3","key":"b9","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E175","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000000703","article-title":"Effect of indirect neural decompression through oblique lateral interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar disease","volume":"40","author":"Fujibayashi S","year":"2015","unstructured":"Fujibayashi S, Hynes RA, Otsuki B,  Effect of indirect neural decompression through oblique lateral interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar disease. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015;40(3):E175\u2013E182.10.1097\/BRS.0000000000000703"},{"issue":"suppl 4","key":"b10","series-title":"Eur Spine J","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"464","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-017-5115-6","article-title":"Extreme lateral interbody fusion in spinal revision surgery: clinical results and complications","volume":"26","author":"Formica M","year":"2017","unstructured":"Formica M, Zanirato A, Cavagnaro L,  Extreme lateral interbody fusion in spinal revision surgery: clinical results and complications. Eur Spine J. 2017;26(suppl 4):464\u2013470.2848809510.1007\/s00586-017-5115-6"},{"issue":"1","key":"b11","series-title":"Spine Surg Relat Res","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"86","DOI":"10.22603\/ssrr.2017-0035","article-title":"Salvage strategy for failed spinal fusion surgery using lumbar lateral interbody fusion technique: a technical note","volume":"2","author":"Orita S","year":"2018","unstructured":"Orita S, Nakajima T, Konno K,  Salvage strategy for failed spinal fusion surgery using lumbar lateral interbody fusion technique: a technical note. Spine Surg Relat Res. 2018;2(1):86\u201392.3144065310.22603\/ssrr.2017-0035"},{"issue":"11","key":"b12","series-title":"Spine J","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2025","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2018.04.008","article-title":"Stand-alone lateral lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of symptomatic adjacent segment degeneration following previous lumbar fusion","volume":"18","author":"Louie PK","year":"2018","unstructured":"Louie PK, Varthi AG, Narain AS,  Stand-alone lateral lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of symptomatic adjacent segment degeneration following previous lumbar fusion. Spine J. 2018;18(11):2025\u20132032.2967973010.1016\/j.spinee.2018.04.008"},{"issue":"40","key":"b13","series-title":"Medicine (Baltimore)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e12680","DOI":"10.1097\/MD.0000000000012680","article-title":"Comparing stand-alone oblique lumbar interbody fusion with posterior lumbar interbody fusion for revision of rostral adjacent segment disease: a STROBE-compliant study","volume":"97","author":"Zhu G","year":"2018","unstructured":"Zhu G, Hao Y, Yu L,  Comparing stand-alone oblique lumbar interbody fusion with posterior lumbar interbody fusion for revision of rostral adjacent segment disease: a STROBE-compliant study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018;97(40):e12680.10.1097\/MD.0000000000012680"},{"issue":"14","key":"b14","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1601","DOI":"10.1097\/01.BRS.0000077510.95462.39","article-title":"Association of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association score with the Oswestry Disability Index, Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, and Short-Form 36","volume":"28","author":"Fujiwara A","year":"2003","unstructured":"Fujiwara A, Kobayashi N, Saiki K,  Association of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association score with the Oswestry Disability Index, Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, and Short-Form 36. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003;28(14):1601\u20131607.10.1097\/01.BRS.0000077510.95462.39"},{"key":"b15","series-title":"World Neurosurg","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e26","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2019.07.226","article-title":"Revision for endoscopic diskectomy: is lateral lumbar interbody fusion an option?","volume":"133","author":"Qiao G","year":"2020","unstructured":"Qiao G, Feng M, Wang X,  Revision for endoscopic diskectomy: is lateral lumbar interbody fusion an option? World Neurosurg. 2020;133:e26\u2013e30.10.1016\/j.wneu.2019.07.22631398523"},{"issue":"11","key":"b16","series-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Br","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1518","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.93B11.27187","article-title":"Efficacy of less invasive posterior lumbar interbody fusion as revision surgery for patients with recurrent symptoms after discectomy","volume":"93","author":"Lakkol S","year":"2011","unstructured":"Lakkol S, Bhatia C, Taranu R,  Efficacy of less invasive posterior lumbar interbody fusion as revision surgery for patients with recurrent symptoms after discectomy. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011;93(11):1518\u20131523.2205830510.1302\/0301-620X.93B11.27187"},{"issue":"4","key":"b17","series-title":"Eur Spine J","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"623","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-010-1578-4","article-title":"Minimally invasive or open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion as revision surgery for patients previously treated by open discectomy and decompression of the lumbar spine","volume":"20","author":"Wang J","year":"2011","unstructured":"Wang J, Zhou Y, Zhang ZF,  Minimally invasive or open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion as revision surgery for patients previously treated by open discectomy and decompression of the lumbar spine. Eur Spine J. 2011;20(4):623\u2013628.2092755710.1007\/s00586-010-1578-4"},{"issue":"4","key":"b18","series-title":"J Spinal Disord Tech","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"337","DOI":"10.1097\/01.bsd.0000166642.69189.45","article-title":"Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: clinical and radiographic results and complications in 100 consecutive patients","volume":"18","author":"Potter BK","year":"2005","unstructured":"Potter BK, Freedman BA, Verwiebe EG,  Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: clinical and radiographic results and complications in 100 consecutive patients. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2005;18(4):337\u2013346.10.1097\/01.bsd.0000166642.69189.4516021015"},{"issue":"3","key":"b19","series-title":"Semin Spine Surg","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"150","DOI":"10.1053\/j.semss.2007.06.004","article-title":"Revision surgery for lumbar stenosis: techniques, results, and complications","volume":"19","author":"Bono CM","year":"2007","unstructured":"Bono CM, Brick GW. Revision surgery for lumbar stenosis: techniques, results, and complications. Semin Spine Surg. 2007;19(3):150\u2013164.10.1053\/j.semss.2007.06.004"},{"issue":"6)(B6","key":"b20","series-title":"Bone Joint J","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"807","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.96B6.31149","article-title":"National trends in revision spinal fusion in the USA: patient characteristics and complications","volume":"96-B","author":"Rajaee SS","year":"2014","unstructured":"Rajaee SS, Kanim LEA, Bae HW. National trends in revision spinal fusion in the USA: patient characteristics and complications. Bone Joint J. 2014;96-B(6)(B6):807\u2013816.2489158310.1302\/0301-620X.96B6.31149"},{"key":"b21","series-title":"World Neurosurg","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e1181","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2018.05.197","article-title":"Controllable risk factors for neurologic complications in posterior lumbar interbody fusion as revision surgery","volume":"116","author":"Yamashita T","year":"2018","unstructured":"Yamashita T, Okuda S, Aono H,  Controllable risk factors for neurologic complications in posterior lumbar interbody fusion as revision surgery. World Neurosurg. 2018;116:e1181\u2013e1187.10.1016\/j.wneu.2018.05.19729870848"},{"issue":"1","key":"b22","series-title":"J Spine Surg","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2","DOI":"10.21037\/jss.2015.12.01","article-title":"Comparison of ALIF vs. XLIF for L4\/5 interbody fusion: pros, cons, and literature review","volume":"2","author":"Winder MJ","year":"2016","unstructured":"Winder MJ, Gambhir S. Comparison of ALIF vs. XLIF for L4\/5 interbody fusion: pros, cons, and literature review. J Spine Surg. 2016;2(1):2\u20138.10.21037\/jss.2015.12.0127683688"},{"issue":"26","key":"b23","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E1582","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000000645","article-title":"Radiographical and clinical evaluation of extreme lateral interbody fusion: effects of cage size and instrumentation type with a minimum of 1-year follow-up","volume":"39","author":"Tohmeh AG","year":"2014","unstructured":"Tohmeh AG, Khorsand D, Watson B, Zielinski X. Radiographical and clinical evaluation of extreme lateral interbody fusion: effects of cage size and instrumentation type with a minimum of 1-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014;39(26):E1582\u2013E1591.10.1097\/BRS.0000000000000645"},{"issue":"4","key":"b24","series-title":"Asian Spine J","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"584","DOI":"10.31616\/asj.2018.0232","article-title":"Unplanned second-stage decompression for neurological deterioration caused by central canal stenosis after indirect lumbar decompression surgery","volume":"13","author":"Nakashima H","year":"2019","unstructured":"Nakashima H, Kanemura T, Satake K,  Unplanned second-stage decompression for neurological deterioration caused by central canal stenosis after indirect lumbar decompression surgery. Asian Spine J. 2019;13(4):584\u2013591.10.31616\/asj.2018.023230866617"},{"issue":"6","key":"b25","series-title":"Am J Epidemiol","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"710","DOI":"10.1093\/aje\/kwk052","article-title":"Relaxing the rule of ten events per variable in logistic and Cox regression","volume":"165","author":"Vittinghoff E","year":"2007","unstructured":"Vittinghoff E, McCulloch CE. Relaxing the rule of ten events per variable in logistic and Cox regression. Am J Epidemiol. 2007;165(6):710\u2013718.10.1093\/aje\/kwk05217182981"},{"issue":"1","key":"b1","series-title":"J Neurosurg Spine","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"44","DOI":"10.3171\/2011.9.SPINE11373","article-title":"Perioperative surgical complications of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a single-center experience","volume":"16","author":"Tormenti MJ","year":"2012","unstructured":"Tormenti MJ, Maserati MB, Bonfield CM,  Perioperative surgical complications of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a single-center experience. J Neurosurg Spine. 2012;16(1):44\u201350.2199938910.3171\/2011.9.SPINE11373"},{"issue":"3","key":"b2","series-title":"J Spinal Disord Tech","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"207","DOI":"10.1097\/BSD.0b013e318169026f","article-title":"Minimally invasive interbody fusion for revision lumbar surgery: technical feasibility and safety","volume":"22","author":"Selznick LA","year":"2009","unstructured":"Selznick LA, Shamji MF, Isaacs RE. Minimally invasive interbody fusion for revision lumbar surgery: technical feasibility and safety. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2009;22(3):207\u2013213.1941202410.1097\/BSD.0b013e318169026f"},{"issue":"3","key":"b3","series-title":"J Neurosurg Spine","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"260","DOI":"10.3171\/2012.11.SPINE12558","article-title":"Perioperative complications in patients undergoing open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion as a revision surgery","volume":"18","author":"Khan IS","year":"2013","unstructured":"Khan IS, Sonig A, Thakur JD,  Perioperative complications in patients undergoing open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion as a revision surgery. J Neurosurg Spine. 2013;18(3):260\u2013264.2325954010.3171\/2012.11.SPINE12558"},{"key":"b4","series-title":"Biomed Res Int","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"919248","DOI":"10.1155\/2014\/919248","article-title":"Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with unilateral pedicle screw fixation: comparison between primary and revision surgery","volume":"2014","author":"Kang MS","year":"2014","unstructured":"Kang MS, Park JY, Kim KH,  Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with unilateral pedicle screw fixation: comparison between primary and revision surgery. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:919248.2494948310.1155\/2014\/919248"},{"issue":"4","key":"b5","series-title":"Spine J","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"435","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2005.08.012","article-title":"Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion (XLIF): a novel surgical technique for anterior lumbar interbody fusion","volume":"6","author":"Ozgur BM","year":"2006","unstructured":"Ozgur BM, Aryan HE, Pimenta L, Taylor WR. Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion (XLIF): a novel surgical technique for anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine J. 2006;6(4):435\u2013443.1682505210.1016\/j.spinee.2005.08.012"},{"issue":"suppl 3","key":"b6","series-title":"Eur Spine J","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"339","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-015-3807-3","article-title":"Clinical results and limitations of indirect decompression in spinal stenosis with laterally implanted interbody cages: results from a prospective cohort study","volume":"24","author":"Malham GM","year":"2015","unstructured":"Malham GM, Parker RM, Goss B, Blecher CM. Clinical results and limitations of indirect decompression in spinal stenosis with laterally implanted interbody cages: results from a prospective cohort study. Eur Spine J. 2015;24(suppl 3):339\u2013345.10.1007\/s00586-015-3807-325681117"},{"issue":"26)(suppl","key":"b7","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S331","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3182022db0","article-title":"A radiographic assessment of the ability of the extreme lateral interbody fusion procedure to indirectly decompress the neural elements","volume":"35","author":"Oliveira L","year":"2010","unstructured":"Oliveira L, Marchi L, Coutinho E, Pimenta L. A radiographic assessment of the ability of the extreme lateral interbody fusion procedure to indirectly decompress the neural elements. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010;35(26)(suppl):S331\u2013S337.10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3182022db0"},{"issue":"3","key":"b8","series-title":"Eur Spine J","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"671","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-015-4170-0","article-title":"Radiographic evaluation of indirect decompression of mini-open anterior retroperitoneal lumbar interbody fusion: oblique lateral interbody fusion for degenerated lumbar spondylolisthesis","volume":"26","author":"Sato J","year":"2017","unstructured":"Sato J, Ohtori S, Orita S,  Radiographic evaluation of indirect decompression of mini-open anterior retroperitoneal lumbar interbody fusion: oblique lateral interbody fusion for degenerated lumbar spondylolisthesis. Eur Spine J. 2017;26(3):671\u2013678.2624590610.1007\/s00586-015-4170-0"},{"issue":"3","key":"b9","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E175","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000000703","article-title":"Effect of indirect neural decompression through oblique lateral interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar disease","volume":"40","author":"Fujibayashi S","year":"2015","unstructured":"Fujibayashi S, Hynes RA, Otsuki B,  Effect of indirect neural decompression through oblique lateral interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar disease. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015;40(3):E175\u2013E182.10.1097\/BRS.0000000000000703"},{"issue":"suppl 4","key":"b10","series-title":"Eur Spine J","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"464","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-017-5115-6","article-title":"Extreme lateral interbody fusion in spinal revision surgery: clinical results and complications","volume":"26","author":"Formica M","year":"2017","unstructured":"Formica M, Zanirato A, Cavagnaro L,  Extreme lateral interbody fusion in spinal revision surgery: clinical results and complications. Eur Spine J. 2017;26(suppl 4):464\u2013470.2848809510.1007\/s00586-017-5115-6"},{"issue":"1","key":"b11","series-title":"Spine Surg Relat Res","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"86","DOI":"10.22603\/ssrr.2017-0035","article-title":"Salvage strategy for failed spinal fusion surgery using lumbar lateral interbody fusion technique: a technical note","volume":"2","author":"Orita S","year":"2018","unstructured":"Orita S, Nakajima T, Konno K,  Salvage strategy for failed spinal fusion surgery using lumbar lateral interbody fusion technique: a technical note. Spine Surg Relat Res. 2018;2(1):86\u201392.3144065310.22603\/ssrr.2017-0035"},{"issue":"11","key":"b12","series-title":"Spine J","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2025","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2018.04.008","article-title":"Stand-alone lateral lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of symptomatic adjacent segment degeneration following previous lumbar fusion","volume":"18","author":"Louie PK","year":"2018","unstructured":"Louie PK, Varthi AG, Narain AS,  Stand-alone lateral lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of symptomatic adjacent segment degeneration following previous lumbar fusion. Spine J. 2018;18(11):2025\u20132032.2967973010.1016\/j.spinee.2018.04.008"},{"issue":"40","key":"b13","series-title":"Medicine (Baltimore)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e12680","DOI":"10.1097\/MD.0000000000012680","article-title":"Comparing stand-alone oblique lumbar interbody fusion with posterior lumbar interbody fusion for revision of rostral adjacent segment disease: a STROBE-compliant study","volume":"97","author":"Zhu G","year":"2018","unstructured":"Zhu G, Hao Y, Yu L,  Comparing stand-alone oblique lumbar interbody fusion with posterior lumbar interbody fusion for revision of rostral adjacent segment disease: a STROBE-compliant study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018;97(40):e12680.10.1097\/MD.0000000000012680"},{"issue":"14","key":"b14","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1601","DOI":"10.1097\/01.BRS.0000077510.95462.39","article-title":"Association of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association score with the Oswestry Disability Index, Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, and Short-Form 36","volume":"28","author":"Fujiwara A","year":"2003","unstructured":"Fujiwara A, Kobayashi N, Saiki K,  Association of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association score with the Oswestry Disability Index, Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, and Short-Form 36. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003;28(14):1601\u20131607.10.1097\/01.BRS.0000077510.95462.39"},{"key":"b15","series-title":"World Neurosurg","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e26","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2019.07.226","article-title":"Revision for endoscopic diskectomy: is lateral lumbar interbody fusion an option?","volume":"133","author":"Qiao G","year":"2020","unstructured":"Qiao G, Feng M, Wang X,  Revision for endoscopic diskectomy: is lateral lumbar interbody fusion an option? World Neurosurg. 2020;133:e26\u2013e30.10.1016\/j.wneu.2019.07.22631398523"},{"issue":"11","key":"b16","series-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Br","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1518","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.93B11.27187","article-title":"Efficacy of less invasive posterior lumbar interbody fusion as revision surgery for patients with recurrent symptoms after discectomy","volume":"93","author":"Lakkol S","year":"2011","unstructured":"Lakkol S, Bhatia C, Taranu R,  Efficacy of less invasive posterior lumbar interbody fusion as revision surgery for patients with recurrent symptoms after discectomy. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011;93(11):1518\u20131523.2205830510.1302\/0301-620X.93B11.27187"},{"issue":"4","key":"b17","series-title":"Eur Spine J","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"623","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-010-1578-4","article-title":"Minimally invasive or open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion as revision surgery for patients previously treated by open discectomy and decompression of the lumbar spine","volume":"20","author":"Wang J","year":"2011","unstructured":"Wang J, Zhou Y, Zhang ZF,  Minimally invasive or open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion as revision surgery for patients previously treated by open discectomy and decompression of the lumbar spine. Eur Spine J. 2011;20(4):623\u2013628.2092755710.1007\/s00586-010-1578-4"},{"issue":"4","key":"b18","series-title":"J Spinal Disord Tech","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"337","DOI":"10.1097\/01.bsd.0000166642.69189.45","article-title":"Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: clinical and radiographic results and complications in 100 consecutive patients","volume":"18","author":"Potter BK","year":"2005","unstructured":"Potter BK, Freedman BA, Verwiebe EG,  Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: clinical and radiographic results and complications in 100 consecutive patients. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2005;18(4):337\u2013346.10.1097\/01.bsd.0000166642.69189.4516021015"},{"issue":"3","key":"b19","series-title":"Semin Spine Surg","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"150","DOI":"10.1053\/j.semss.2007.06.004","article-title":"Revision surgery for lumbar stenosis: techniques, results, and complications","volume":"19","author":"Bono CM","year":"2007","unstructured":"Bono CM, Brick GW. Revision surgery for lumbar stenosis: techniques, results, and complications. Semin Spine Surg. 2007;19(3):150\u2013164.10.1053\/j.semss.2007.06.004"},{"issue":"6)(B6","key":"b20","series-title":"Bone Joint J","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"807","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.96B6.31149","article-title":"National trends in revision spinal fusion in the USA: patient characteristics and complications","volume":"96-B","author":"Rajaee SS","year":"2014","unstructured":"Rajaee SS, Kanim LEA, Bae HW. National trends in revision spinal fusion in the USA: patient characteristics and complications. Bone Joint J. 2014;96-B(6)(B6):807\u2013816.2489158310.1302\/0301-620X.96B6.31149"},{"key":"b21","series-title":"World Neurosurg","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e1181","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2018.05.197","article-title":"Controllable risk factors for neurologic complications in posterior lumbar interbody fusion as revision surgery","volume":"116","author":"Yamashita T","year":"2018","unstructured":"Yamashita T, Okuda S, Aono H,  Controllable risk factors for neurologic complications in posterior lumbar interbody fusion as revision surgery. World Neurosurg. 2018;116:e1181\u2013e1187.10.1016\/j.wneu.2018.05.19729870848"},{"issue":"1","key":"b22","series-title":"J Spine Surg","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2","DOI":"10.21037\/jss.2015.12.01","article-title":"Comparison of ALIF vs. XLIF for L4\/5 interbody fusion: pros, cons, and literature review","volume":"2","author":"Winder MJ","year":"2016","unstructured":"Winder MJ, Gambhir S. Comparison of ALIF vs. XLIF for L4\/5 interbody fusion: pros, cons, and literature review. J Spine Surg. 2016;2(1):2\u20138.10.21037\/jss.2015.12.0127683688"},{"issue":"26","key":"b23","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E1582","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000000645","article-title":"Radiographical and clinical evaluation of extreme lateral interbody fusion: effects of cage size and instrumentation type with a minimum of 1-year follow-up","volume":"39","author":"Tohmeh AG","year":"2014","unstructured":"Tohmeh AG, Khorsand D, Watson B, Zielinski X. Radiographical and clinical evaluation of extreme lateral interbody fusion: effects of cage size and instrumentation type with a minimum of 1-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014;39(26):E1582\u2013E1591.10.1097\/BRS.0000000000000645"},{"issue":"4","key":"b24","series-title":"Asian Spine J","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"584","DOI":"10.31616\/asj.2018.0232","article-title":"Unplanned second-stage decompression for neurological deterioration caused by central canal stenosis after indirect lumbar decompression surgery","volume":"13","author":"Nakashima H","year":"2019","unstructured":"Nakashima H, Kanemura T, Satake K,  Unplanned second-stage decompression for neurological deterioration caused by central canal stenosis after indirect lumbar decompression surgery. Asian Spine J. 2019;13(4):584\u2013591.10.31616\/asj.2018.023230866617"},{"issue":"6","key":"b25","series-title":"Am J Epidemiol","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"710","DOI":"10.1093\/aje\/kwk052","article-title":"Relaxing the rule of ten events per variable in logistic and Cox regression","volume":"165","author":"Vittinghoff E","year":"2007","unstructured":"Vittinghoff E, McCulloch CE. Relaxing the rule of ten events per variable in logistic and Cox regression. Am J Epidemiol. 2007;165(6):710\u2013718.10.1093\/aje\/kwk05217182981"}],"container-title":["Neurosurgical Focus"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/thejns.org\/view\/journals\/neurosurg-focus\/49\/3\/article-pE11.xml","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/thejns.org\/downloadpdf\/journals\/neurosurg-focus\/49\/3\/article-pE11.xml","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"syndication"},{"URL":"https:\/\/thejns.org\/downloadpdf\/journals\/neurosurg-focus\/49\/3\/article-pE11.xml","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,30]],"date-time":"2026-05-30T08:35:02Z","timestamp":1780130102000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/thejns.org\/view\/journals\/neurosurg-focus\/49\/3\/article-pE11.xml"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,9]]},"references-count":50,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3"},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3171\/2020.6.focus20361","relation":{},"ISSN":["1092-0684"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1092-0684","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,9]]}}}