{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,30]],"date-time":"2026-05-30T09:04:27Z","timestamp":1780131867345,"version":"3.54.0"},"reference-count":70,"publisher":"Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG)","issue":"3","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,9]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>OBJECTIVE<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>In an effort to prevent loss of segmental lordosis (SL) with minimally invasive interbody fusions, manufacturers have increased the amount of lordosis that is built into interbody cages. However, the relationship between cage lordotic angle and actual SL achieved intraoperatively remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to determine if the lordotic angle manufactured into an interbody cage impacts the change in SL during minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for lumbar interbody fusion (LIF) done for degenerative pathology.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>METHODS<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The authors performed a retrospective review of a single-surgeon database of adult patients who underwent primary LIF between April 2017 and December 2018. Procedures were performed for 1\u20132-level lumbar degenerative disease using contemporary MIS techniques, including transforaminal LIF (TLIF), lateral LIF (LLIF), and anterior LIF (ALIF). Surgical levels were classified on lateral radiographs based on the cage lordotic angle (6\u00b0\u20138\u00b0, 10\u00b0\u201312\u00b0, and 15\u00b0\u201320\u00b0) and the position of the cage in the disc space (anterior vs posterior). Change in SL was the primary outcome of interest. Subgroup analyses of the cage lordotic angle within each surgical approach were also conducted.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>RESULTS<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>A total of 116 surgical levels in 98 patients were included. Surgical approaches included TLIF (56.1%), LLIF (32.7%), and ALIF (11.2%). There were no differences in SL gained by cage lordotic angle (2.7\u00b0 SL gain with 6\u00b0\u20138\u00b0 cages, 1.6\u00b0 with 10\u00b0\u201312\u00b0 cages, and 3.4\u00b0 with 15\u00b0\u201320\u00b0 cages, p = 0.581). Subgroup analysis of LLIF showed increased SL with 15\u00b0 cages only (p = 0.002). The change in SL was highest after ALIF (average increase 9.8\u00b0 in SL vs 1.8\u00b0 in TLIF vs 1.8\u00b0 in LLIF, p &lt; 0.001). Anterior position of the cage in the disc space was also associated with a significantly greater gain in SL (4.2\u00b0 vs \u22120.3\u00b0, p = 0.001), and was the only factor independently correlated with SL gain (p = 0.016).<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>CONCLUSIONS<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Compared with cage lordotic angle, cage position and approach play larger roles in the generation of SL in 1\u20132-level MIS for lumbar degenerative disease.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.3171\/2020.6.focus20393","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,9,1]],"date-time":"2020-09-01T06:32:03Z","timestamp":1598941923000},"page":"E17","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":55,"title":["Does interbody cage lordosis impact actual segmental lordosis achieved in minimally invasive lumbar spine fusion?"],"prefix":"10.3171","volume":"49","author":[{"given":"Francis C.","family":"Lovecchio","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York;"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Avani S.","family":"Vaishnav","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York;"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Michael E.","family":"Steinhaus","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York;"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Yahya A.","family":"Othman","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Weill Cornell Medicine\u2013Qatar, Alsad, Doha, Qatar; and"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Catherine Himo","family":"Gang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York;"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Sravisht","family":"Iyer","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York;"},{"name":"Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Steven J.","family":"McAnany","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York;"},{"name":"Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Todd J.","family":"Albert","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York;"},{"name":"Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Sheeraz A.","family":"Qureshi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York;"},{"name":"Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1754","reference":[{"issue":"5","key":"b1","series-title":"J Neurosurg Spine","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"560","DOI":"10.3171\/2018.4.SPINE171153","article-title":"The impact of age on surgical goals for spinopelvic alignment in minimally invasive surgery for adult spinal deformity","volume":"29","author":"Park P","year":"2018","unstructured":"Park P, Fu KM, Mummaneni PV,  The impact of age on surgical goals for spinopelvic alignment in minimally invasive surgery for adult spinal deformity. J Neurosurg Spine. 2018;29(5):560\u2013564.10.3171\/2018.4.SPINE17115330095383"},{"issue":"17","key":"b2","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1275","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000002146","article-title":"Age-adjusted alignment goals have the potential to reduce PJK","volume":"42","author":"Lafage R","year":"2017","unstructured":"Lafage R, Schwab F, Glassman S,  Age-adjusted alignment goals have the potential to reduce PJK. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017;42(17):1275\u20131282.10.1097\/BRS.0000000000002146"},{"issue":"5","key":"b3","series-title":"Spine J","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"951","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2018.10.017","article-title":"Restoration of lumbar lordosis after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review","volume":"19","author":"Carlson BB","year":"2019","unstructured":"Carlson BB, Saville P, Dowdell J,  Restoration of lumbar lordosis after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review. Spine J. 2019;19(5):951\u2013958.10.1016\/j.spinee.2018.10.01730529420"},{"issue":"5","key":"b4","series-title":"Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown).","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"518","DOI":"10.1093\/ons\/opz240","article-title":"Retrospective review of immediate restoration of lordosis in single-level minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a comparison of static and expandable interbody cages","volume":"18","author":"Vaishnav AS","year":"2020","unstructured":"Vaishnav AS, Saville P, McAnany S,  Retrospective review of immediate restoration of lordosis in single-level minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a comparison of static and expandable interbody cages. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2020;18(5):518\u2013523.3150484610.1093\/ons\/opz240"},{"issue":"1","key":"b5","series-title":"J Neurosurg Spine","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"21","DOI":"10.3171\/2015.12.SPINE15999","article-title":"Clinical and radiographic parameters associated with best versus worst clinical outcomes in minimally invasive spinal deformity surgery","volume":"25","author":"Than KD","year":"2016","unstructured":"Than KD, Park P, Fu KM,  Clinical and radiographic parameters associated with best versus worst clinical outcomes in minimally invasive spinal deformity surgery. J Neurosurg Spine. 2016;25(1):21\u201325.10.3171\/2015.12.SPINE1599926943254"},{"issue":"5)(E13","key":"b6","series-title":"Neurosurg Focus","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E13","DOI":"10.3171\/2014.3.FOCUS1424","article-title":"Comparison of radiographic results after minimally invasive, hybrid, and open surgery for adult spinal deformity: a multicenter study of 184 patients","volume":"36","author":"Haque RM","year":"2014","unstructured":"Haque RM, Mundis GM Jr, Ahmed Y,  Comparison of radiographic results after minimally invasive, hybrid, and open surgery for adult spinal deformity: a multicenter study of 184 patients. Neurosurg Focus. 2014;36(5)(E13):E13.10.3171\/2014.3.FOCUS142424785478"},{"issue":"22","key":"b7","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E1350","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000002705","article-title":"Lordosis recreation in transforaminal and posterior lumbar interbody fusion: a cadaveric study of the influence of surgical bone resection and cage angle","volume":"43","author":"Robertson PA","year":"2018","unstructured":"Robertson PA, Armstrong WA, Woods DL, Rawlinson JJ. Lordosis recreation in transforaminal and posterior lumbar interbody fusion: a cadaveric study of the influence of surgical bone resection and cage angle. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018;43(22):E1350\u2013E1357.10.1097\/BRS.0000000000002705"},{"issue":"3","key":"b8","series-title":"Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"318","DOI":"10.1007\/s12178-019-09570-6","article-title":"The current state of minimally invasive approaches to adult spinal deformity","volume":"12","author":"Lovecchio F","year":"2019","unstructured":"Lovecchio F, Qureshi SA. The current state of minimally invasive approaches to adult spinal deformity. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2019;12(3):318\u2013327.10.1007\/s12178-019-09570-6"},{"issue":"11","key":"b9","series-title":"World J Orthop","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"996","DOI":"10.5312\/wjo.v6.i11.996","article-title":"Perioperative outcomes in minimally invasive lumbar spine surgery: A systematic review","volume":"6","author":"Skovrlj B","year":"2015","unstructured":"Skovrlj B, Belton P, Zarzour H, Qureshi SA. Perioperative outcomes in minimally invasive lumbar spine surgery: A systematic review. World J Orthop. 2015;6(11):996\u20131005.10.5312\/wjo.v6.i11.99626716097"},{"issue":"suppl 1","key":"b10","series-title":"J Spine Surg","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S101","DOI":"10.21037\/jss.2019.05.03","article-title":"Using minimally invasive techniques adds to the value equation for select patients","volume":"5","author":"Mok JK","year":"2019","unstructured":"Mok JK, Gang CH, Qureshi S, McAnany SJ. Using minimally invasive techniques adds to the value equation for select patients. J Spine Surg. 2019;5(suppl 1):S101\u2013S107.10.21037\/jss.2019.05.03"},{"key":"b11","series-title":"World Neurosurg","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"249","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2017.05.122","article-title":"Anterior column realignment has similar results to pedicle subtraction osteotomy in treating adults with sagittal plane deformity","volume":"105","author":"Mundis GM Jr","year":"2017","unstructured":"Mundis GM Jr, Turner JD, Kabirian N,  Anterior column realignment has similar results to pedicle subtraction osteotomy in treating adults with sagittal plane deformity. World Neurosurg. 2017;105:249\u2013256.10.1016\/j.wneu.2017.05.12228559074"},{"issue":"11","key":"b12","series-title":"Eur Spine J","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2843","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-017-5170-z","article-title":"Do position and size matter? An analysis of cage and placement variables for optimum lordosis in PLIF reconstruction","volume":"26","author":"Landham PR","year":"2017","unstructured":"Landham PR, Don AS, Robertson PA. Do position and size matter? An analysis of cage and placement variables for optimum lordosis in PLIF reconstruction. Eur Spine J. 2017;26(11):2843\u20132850.10.1007\/s00586-017-5170-z28620787"},{"issue":"5","key":"b13","series-title":"J Spinal Disord Tech","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"253","DOI":"10.1097\/BSD.0b013e31828a8447","article-title":"Sagittal alignment after lumbar interbody fusion: comparing anterior, lateral, and transforaminal approaches","volume":"27","author":"Watkins RG IV","year":"2014","unstructured":"Watkins RG IV, Hanna R, Chang D, Watkins RG III. Sagittal alignment after lumbar interbody fusion: comparing anterior, lateral, and transforaminal approaches. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2014;27(5):253\u2013256.2351164110.1097\/BSD.0b013e31828a8447"},{"issue":"5","key":"b14","series-title":"JBMR Plus","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e10180","DOI":"10.1002\/jbm4.10180","article-title":"Discogenic back pain: literature review of definition, diagnosis, and treatment","volume":"3","author":"Fujii K","year":"2019","unstructured":"Fujii K, Yamazaki M, Kang JD,  Discogenic back pain: literature review of definition, diagnosis, and treatment. JBMR Plus. 2019;3(5):e10180.3113134710.1002\/jbm4.10180"},{"issue":"1","key":"b15","series-title":"Int J Spine Surg","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"39","DOI":"10.14444\/6006","article-title":"Radiation exposure in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: the effect of the learning curve","volume":"13","author":"Kumar A","year":"2019","unstructured":"Kumar A, Merrill RK, Overley SC,  Radiation exposure in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: the effect of the learning curve. Int J Spine Surg. 2019;13(1):39\u201345.3080528510.14444\/6006"},{"issue":"8","key":"b16","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E465","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000003310","article-title":"A review of techniques, time demand, radiation exposure, and outcomes of skin-anchored intraoperative 3D navigation in minimally invasive lumbar spinal surgery","volume":"45","author":"Vaishnav AS","year":"2020","unstructured":"Vaishnav AS, Merrill RK, Sandhu H,  A review of techniques, time demand, radiation exposure, and outcomes of skin-anchored intraoperative 3D navigation in minimally invasive lumbar spinal surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020;45(8):E465\u2013E476.10.1097\/BRS.0000000000003310"},{"issue":"suppl 1","key":"b17","series-title":"J Spine Surg","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S25","DOI":"10.21037\/jss.2019.04.23","article-title":"Navigation in minimally invasive spine surgery","volume":"5","author":"Virk S","year":"2019","unstructured":"Virk S, Qureshi S. Navigation in minimally invasive spine surgery. J Spine Surg. 2019;5(suppl 1):S25\u2013S30.10.21037\/jss.2019.04.2331380490"},{"issue":"2","key":"b18","series-title":"Global Spine J","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"190","DOI":"10.1177\/2192568217734520","article-title":"Return to play in adolescent athletes with symptomatic spondylolysis without listhesis: a meta-analysis","volume":"8","author":"Overley SC","year":"2018","unstructured":"Overley SC, McAnany SJ, Andelman S,  Return to play in adolescent athletes with symptomatic spondylolysis without listhesis: a meta-analysis. Global Spine J. 2018;8(2):190\u2013197.10.1177\/219256821773452029662750"},{"issue":"1","key":"b19","series-title":"Clin Spine Surg","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1097\/BSD.0000000000000358","article-title":"Surgical treatment of isthmic spondylolisthesis","volume":"29","author":"Murray MR","year":"2016","unstructured":"Murray MR, Skovrlj B, Qureshi SA. Surgical treatment of isthmic spondylolisthesis. Clin Spine Surg. 2016;29(1):1\u20135.10.1097\/BSD.000000000000035826757143"},{"issue":"12","key":"b20","series-title":"J Am Acad Orthop Surg","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"800","DOI":"10.5435\/JAAOS-22-12-800","article-title":"Three-dimensional intraoperative imaging modalities in orthopaedic surgery: a narrative review","volume":"22","author":"Qureshi S","year":"2014","unstructured":"Qureshi S, Lu Y, McAnany S, Baird E. Three-dimensional intraoperative imaging modalities in orthopaedic surgery: a narrative review. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2014;22(12):800\u2013809.10.5435\/JAAOS-22-12-80025425615"},{"key":"b21","series-title":"J Biomed Inform","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"103208","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jbi.2019.103208","article-title":"The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners","volume":"95","author":"Harris PA","year":"2019","unstructured":"Harris PA, Taylor R, Minor BL,  The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners. J Biomed Inform. 2019;95:103208.10.1016\/j.jbi.2019.10320831078660"},{"issue":"12","key":"b22","series-title":"Spine J","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2493","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2015.08.067","article-title":"Validation of a new computer-assisted tool to measure spino-pelvic parameters","volume":"15","author":"Lafage R","year":"2015","unstructured":"Lafage R, Ferrero E, Henry JK,  Validation of a new computer-assisted tool to measure spino-pelvic parameters. Spine J. 2015;15(12):2493\u20132502.2634324310.1016\/j.spinee.2015.08.067"},{"issue":"13","key":"b23","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E775","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000001957","article-title":"Does lordotic angle of cage determine lumbar lordosis in lumbar interbody fusion?","volume":"42","author":"Hong TH","year":"2017","unstructured":"Hong TH, Cho KJ, Kim YT,  Does lordotic angle of cage determine lumbar lordosis in lumbar interbody fusion? Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017;42(13):E775\u2013E780.10.1097\/BRS.0000000000001957"},{"issue":"4","key":"b24","series-title":"Clin Spine Surg","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E338","DOI":"10.1097\/BSD.0000000000000114","article-title":"Do lordotic cages provide better segmental lordosis versus nonlordotic cages in lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF)?","volume":"30","author":"Sembrano JN","year":"2017","unstructured":"Sembrano JN, Horazdovsky RD, Sharma AK,  Do lordotic cages provide better segmental lordosis versus nonlordotic cages in lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF)? Clin Spine Surg. 2017;30(4):E338\u2013E343.10.1097\/BSD.000000000000011428437335"},{"issue":"5","key":"b25","series-title":"Neurosurgery","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"955","DOI":"10.1227\/01.NEU.0000343544.77456.46","article-title":"Radiographic restoration of lumbar alignment after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion","volume":"64","author":"Jagannathan J","year":"2009","unstructured":"Jagannathan J, Sansur CA, Oskouian RJ Jr,  Radiographic restoration of lumbar alignment after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Neurosurgery. 2009;64(5):955\u2013964.10.1227\/01.NEU.0000343544.77456.4619404155"},{"issue":"1","key":"b26","series-title":"HSS J","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"46","DOI":"10.1007\/s11420-019-09677-z","article-title":"Static versus expandable devices provide similar clinical outcomes following minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion","volume":"16","author":"Khechen B","year":"2020","unstructured":"Khechen B, Haws BE, Patel DV,  Static versus expandable devices provide similar clinical outcomes following minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. HSS J. 2020;16(1):46\u201353.10.1007\/s11420-019-09677-z32015740"},{"issue":"1","key":"b27","series-title":"J Neurosurg Spine","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"92","DOI":"10.3171\/2011.3.SPINE10425","article-title":"Changes in coronal and sagittal plane alignment following minimally invasive direct lateral interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar disease in adults: a radiographic study","volume":"15","author":"Acosta FL","year":"2011","unstructured":"Acosta FL, Liu J, Slimack N,  Changes in coronal and sagittal plane alignment following minimally invasive direct lateral interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar disease in adults: a radiographic study. J Neurosurg Spine. 2011;15(1):92\u201396.10.3171\/2011.3.SPINE1042521476802"},{"issue":"4","key":"b28","series-title":"J Spinal Disord Tech","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"242","DOI":"10.1097\/BSD.0b013e3181ecf995","article-title":"Lateral lumbar interbody fusion: clinical and radiographic outcomes at 1 year: a preliminary report","volume":"24","author":"Sharma AK","year":"2011","unstructured":"Sharma AK, Kepler CK, Girardi FP,  Lateral lumbar interbody fusion: clinical and radiographic outcomes at 1 year: a preliminary report. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2011;24(4):242\u2013250.10.1097\/BSD.0b013e3181ecf99520844451"},{"issue":"5","key":"b29","series-title":"Neurosurg Focus","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E14","DOI":"10.3171\/2014.3.FOCUS13585","article-title":"Limitations and ceiling effects with circumferential minimally invasive correction techniques for adult scoliosis: analysis of radiological outcomes over a 7-year experience","volume":"36","author":"Anand N","year":"2014","unstructured":"Anand N, Baron EM, Khandehroo B. Limitations and ceiling effects with circumferential minimally invasive correction techniques for adult scoliosis: analysis of radiological outcomes over a 7-year experience. Neurosurg Focus. 2014;36(5):E14.10.3171\/2014.3.FOCUS13585"},{"issue":"3","key":"b30","series-title":"Neurosurg Clin N Am","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"399","DOI":"10.1016\/j.nec.2018.03.007","article-title":"Evolution of the minimally invasive spinal deformity surgery algorithm: an evidence-based approach to surgical strategies for deformity correction","volume":"29","author":"Choy W","year":"2018","unstructured":"Choy W, Miller CA, Chan AK,  Evolution of the minimally invasive spinal deformity surgery algorithm: an evidence-based approach to surgical strategies for deformity correction. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2018;29(3):399\u2013406.2993380710.1016\/j.nec.2018.03.007"},{"key":"b31","series-title":"World Neurosurg","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e379","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2018.11.174","article-title":"Anterior column realignment in adult spinal deformity: a case report and review of the literature","volume":"123","author":"Cheung ZB","year":"2019","unstructured":"Cheung ZB, Chen DH, White SJW,  Anterior column realignment in adult spinal deformity: a case report and review of the literature. World Neurosurg. 2019;123:e379\u2013e386.10.1016\/j.wneu.2018.11.17430500589"},{"key":"b32","series-title":"World Neurosurg","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"216","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2017.01.114","article-title":"Comparison of outcomes of anterior, posterior, and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion surgery at a single lumbar level with degenerative spinal disease","volume":"101","author":"Lee N","year":"2017","unstructured":"Lee N, Kim KN, Yi S,  Comparison of outcomes of anterior, posterior, and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion surgery at a single lumbar level with degenerative spinal disease. World Neurosurg. 2017;101:216\u2013226.10.1016\/j.wneu.2017.01.114"},{"issue":"6","key":"b33","series-title":"J Neurosurg Spine","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"650","DOI":"10.3171\/2017.5.SPINE16926","article-title":"Overpowering posterior lumbar instrumentation and fusion with hyperlordotic anterior lumbar interbody cages followed by posterior revision: a preliminary feasibility study","volume":"27","author":"Kadam A","year":"2017","unstructured":"Kadam A, Wigner N, Saville P, Arlet V. Overpowering posterior lumbar instrumentation and fusion with hyperlordotic anterior lumbar interbody cages followed by posterior revision: a preliminary feasibility study. J Neurosurg Spine. 2017;27(6):650\u2013660.2896016010.3171\/2017.5.SPINE16926"},{"issue":"4","key":"b34","series-title":"J Spinal Disord Tech","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"332","DOI":"10.1097\/01.bsd.0000163037.17634.89","article-title":"Comparison of sagittal contour and posterior disc height following interbody fusion: threaded cylindrical cages versus structural allograft versus vertical cages","volume":"18","author":"Groth AT","year":"2005","unstructured":"Groth AT, Kuklo TR, Klemme WR,  Comparison of sagittal contour and posterior disc height following interbody fusion: threaded cylindrical cages versus structural allograft versus vertical cages. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2005;18(4):332\u2013336.1602101410.1097\/01.bsd.0000163037.17634.89"},{"issue":"5","key":"b35","series-title":"J Neurosurg Spine","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"486","DOI":"10.3171\/2017.8.SPINE161231","article-title":"Do intraoperative radiographs predict final lumbar sagittal alignment following single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion?","volume":"28","author":"Salem KMI","year":"2018","unstructured":"Salem KMI, Eranki AP, Paquette S,  Do intraoperative radiographs predict final lumbar sagittal alignment following single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion? J Neurosurg Spine. 2018;28(5):486\u2013491.2945143710.3171\/2017.8.SPINE161231"},{"issue":"5","key":"b1","series-title":"J Neurosurg Spine","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"560","DOI":"10.3171\/2018.4.SPINE171153","article-title":"The impact of age on surgical goals for spinopelvic alignment in minimally invasive surgery for adult spinal deformity","volume":"29","author":"Park P","year":"2018","unstructured":"Park P, Fu KM, Mummaneni PV,  The impact of age on surgical goals for spinopelvic alignment in minimally invasive surgery for adult spinal deformity. J Neurosurg Spine. 2018;29(5):560\u2013564.10.3171\/2018.4.SPINE17115330095383"},{"issue":"17","key":"b2","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1275","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000002146","article-title":"Age-adjusted alignment goals have the potential to reduce PJK","volume":"42","author":"Lafage R","year":"2017","unstructured":"Lafage R, Schwab F, Glassman S,  Age-adjusted alignment goals have the potential to reduce PJK. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017;42(17):1275\u20131282.10.1097\/BRS.0000000000002146"},{"issue":"5","key":"b3","series-title":"Spine J","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"951","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2018.10.017","article-title":"Restoration of lumbar lordosis after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review","volume":"19","author":"Carlson BB","year":"2019","unstructured":"Carlson BB, Saville P, Dowdell J,  Restoration of lumbar lordosis after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review. Spine J. 2019;19(5):951\u2013958.10.1016\/j.spinee.2018.10.01730529420"},{"issue":"5","key":"b4","series-title":"Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown).","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"518","DOI":"10.1093\/ons\/opz240","article-title":"Retrospective review of immediate restoration of lordosis in single-level minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a comparison of static and expandable interbody cages","volume":"18","author":"Vaishnav AS","year":"2020","unstructured":"Vaishnav AS, Saville P, McAnany S,  Retrospective review of immediate restoration of lordosis in single-level minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a comparison of static and expandable interbody cages. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2020;18(5):518\u2013523.3150484610.1093\/ons\/opz240"},{"issue":"1","key":"b5","series-title":"J Neurosurg Spine","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"21","DOI":"10.3171\/2015.12.SPINE15999","article-title":"Clinical and radiographic parameters associated with best versus worst clinical outcomes in minimally invasive spinal deformity surgery","volume":"25","author":"Than KD","year":"2016","unstructured":"Than KD, Park P, Fu KM,  Clinical and radiographic parameters associated with best versus worst clinical outcomes in minimally invasive spinal deformity surgery. J Neurosurg Spine. 2016;25(1):21\u201325.10.3171\/2015.12.SPINE1599926943254"},{"issue":"5)(E13","key":"b6","series-title":"Neurosurg Focus","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E13","DOI":"10.3171\/2014.3.FOCUS1424","article-title":"Comparison of radiographic results after minimally invasive, hybrid, and open surgery for adult spinal deformity: a multicenter study of 184 patients","volume":"36","author":"Haque RM","year":"2014","unstructured":"Haque RM, Mundis GM Jr, Ahmed Y,  Comparison of radiographic results after minimally invasive, hybrid, and open surgery for adult spinal deformity: a multicenter study of 184 patients. Neurosurg Focus. 2014;36(5)(E13):E13.10.3171\/2014.3.FOCUS142424785478"},{"issue":"22","key":"b7","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E1350","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000002705","article-title":"Lordosis recreation in transforaminal and posterior lumbar interbody fusion: a cadaveric study of the influence of surgical bone resection and cage angle","volume":"43","author":"Robertson PA","year":"2018","unstructured":"Robertson PA, Armstrong WA, Woods DL, Rawlinson JJ. Lordosis recreation in transforaminal and posterior lumbar interbody fusion: a cadaveric study of the influence of surgical bone resection and cage angle. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018;43(22):E1350\u2013E1357.10.1097\/BRS.0000000000002705"},{"issue":"3","key":"b8","series-title":"Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"318","DOI":"10.1007\/s12178-019-09570-6","article-title":"The current state of minimally invasive approaches to adult spinal deformity","volume":"12","author":"Lovecchio F","year":"2019","unstructured":"Lovecchio F, Qureshi SA. The current state of minimally invasive approaches to adult spinal deformity. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2019;12(3):318\u2013327.10.1007\/s12178-019-09570-6"},{"issue":"11","key":"b9","series-title":"World J Orthop","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"996","DOI":"10.5312\/wjo.v6.i11.996","article-title":"Perioperative outcomes in minimally invasive lumbar spine surgery: A systematic review","volume":"6","author":"Skovrlj B","year":"2015","unstructured":"Skovrlj B, Belton P, Zarzour H, Qureshi SA. Perioperative outcomes in minimally invasive lumbar spine surgery: A systematic review. World J Orthop. 2015;6(11):996\u20131005.10.5312\/wjo.v6.i11.99626716097"},{"issue":"suppl 1","key":"b10","series-title":"J Spine Surg","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S101","DOI":"10.21037\/jss.2019.05.03","article-title":"Using minimally invasive techniques adds to the value equation for select patients","volume":"5","author":"Mok JK","year":"2019","unstructured":"Mok JK, Gang CH, Qureshi S, McAnany SJ. Using minimally invasive techniques adds to the value equation for select patients. J Spine Surg. 2019;5(suppl 1):S101\u2013S107.10.21037\/jss.2019.05.03"},{"key":"b11","series-title":"World Neurosurg","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"249","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2017.05.122","article-title":"Anterior column realignment has similar results to pedicle subtraction osteotomy in treating adults with sagittal plane deformity","volume":"105","author":"Mundis GM Jr","year":"2017","unstructured":"Mundis GM Jr, Turner JD, Kabirian N,  Anterior column realignment has similar results to pedicle subtraction osteotomy in treating adults with sagittal plane deformity. World Neurosurg. 2017;105:249\u2013256.10.1016\/j.wneu.2017.05.12228559074"},{"issue":"11","key":"b12","series-title":"Eur Spine J","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2843","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-017-5170-z","article-title":"Do position and size matter? An analysis of cage and placement variables for optimum lordosis in PLIF reconstruction","volume":"26","author":"Landham PR","year":"2017","unstructured":"Landham PR, Don AS, Robertson PA. Do position and size matter? An analysis of cage and placement variables for optimum lordosis in PLIF reconstruction. Eur Spine J. 2017;26(11):2843\u20132850.10.1007\/s00586-017-5170-z28620787"},{"issue":"5","key":"b13","series-title":"J Spinal Disord Tech","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"253","DOI":"10.1097\/BSD.0b013e31828a8447","article-title":"Sagittal alignment after lumbar interbody fusion: comparing anterior, lateral, and transforaminal approaches","volume":"27","author":"Watkins RG IV","year":"2014","unstructured":"Watkins RG IV, Hanna R, Chang D, Watkins RG III. Sagittal alignment after lumbar interbody fusion: comparing anterior, lateral, and transforaminal approaches. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2014;27(5):253\u2013256.2351164110.1097\/BSD.0b013e31828a8447"},{"issue":"5","key":"b14","series-title":"JBMR Plus","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e10180","DOI":"10.1002\/jbm4.10180","article-title":"Discogenic back pain: literature review of definition, diagnosis, and treatment","volume":"3","author":"Fujii K","year":"2019","unstructured":"Fujii K, Yamazaki M, Kang JD,  Discogenic back pain: literature review of definition, diagnosis, and treatment. JBMR Plus. 2019;3(5):e10180.3113134710.1002\/jbm4.10180"},{"issue":"1","key":"b15","series-title":"Int J Spine Surg","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"39","DOI":"10.14444\/6006","article-title":"Radiation exposure in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: the effect of the learning curve","volume":"13","author":"Kumar A","year":"2019","unstructured":"Kumar A, Merrill RK, Overley SC,  Radiation exposure in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: the effect of the learning curve. Int J Spine Surg. 2019;13(1):39\u201345.3080528510.14444\/6006"},{"issue":"8","key":"b16","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E465","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000003310","article-title":"A review of techniques, time demand, radiation exposure, and outcomes of skin-anchored intraoperative 3D navigation in minimally invasive lumbar spinal surgery","volume":"45","author":"Vaishnav AS","year":"2020","unstructured":"Vaishnav AS, Merrill RK, Sandhu H,  A review of techniques, time demand, radiation exposure, and outcomes of skin-anchored intraoperative 3D navigation in minimally invasive lumbar spinal surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020;45(8):E465\u2013E476.10.1097\/BRS.0000000000003310"},{"issue":"suppl 1","key":"b17","series-title":"J Spine Surg","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S25","DOI":"10.21037\/jss.2019.04.23","article-title":"Navigation in minimally invasive spine surgery","volume":"5","author":"Virk S","year":"2019","unstructured":"Virk S, Qureshi S. Navigation in minimally invasive spine surgery. J Spine Surg. 2019;5(suppl 1):S25\u2013S30.10.21037\/jss.2019.04.2331380490"},{"issue":"2","key":"b18","series-title":"Global Spine J","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"190","DOI":"10.1177\/2192568217734520","article-title":"Return to play in adolescent athletes with symptomatic spondylolysis without listhesis: a meta-analysis","volume":"8","author":"Overley SC","year":"2018","unstructured":"Overley SC, McAnany SJ, Andelman S,  Return to play in adolescent athletes with symptomatic spondylolysis without listhesis: a meta-analysis. Global Spine J. 2018;8(2):190\u2013197.10.1177\/219256821773452029662750"},{"issue":"1","key":"b19","series-title":"Clin Spine Surg","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1097\/BSD.0000000000000358","article-title":"Surgical treatment of isthmic spondylolisthesis","volume":"29","author":"Murray MR","year":"2016","unstructured":"Murray MR, Skovrlj B, Qureshi SA. Surgical treatment of isthmic spondylolisthesis. Clin Spine Surg. 2016;29(1):1\u20135.10.1097\/BSD.000000000000035826757143"},{"issue":"12","key":"b20","series-title":"J Am Acad Orthop Surg","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"800","DOI":"10.5435\/JAAOS-22-12-800","article-title":"Three-dimensional intraoperative imaging modalities in orthopaedic surgery: a narrative review","volume":"22","author":"Qureshi S","year":"2014","unstructured":"Qureshi S, Lu Y, McAnany S, Baird E. Three-dimensional intraoperative imaging modalities in orthopaedic surgery: a narrative review. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2014;22(12):800\u2013809.10.5435\/JAAOS-22-12-80025425615"},{"key":"b21","series-title":"J Biomed Inform","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"103208","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jbi.2019.103208","article-title":"The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners","volume":"95","author":"Harris PA","year":"2019","unstructured":"Harris PA, Taylor R, Minor BL,  The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners. J Biomed Inform. 2019;95:103208.10.1016\/j.jbi.2019.10320831078660"},{"issue":"12","key":"b22","series-title":"Spine J","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2493","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2015.08.067","article-title":"Validation of a new computer-assisted tool to measure spino-pelvic parameters","volume":"15","author":"Lafage R","year":"2015","unstructured":"Lafage R, Ferrero E, Henry JK,  Validation of a new computer-assisted tool to measure spino-pelvic parameters. Spine J. 2015;15(12):2493\u20132502.2634324310.1016\/j.spinee.2015.08.067"},{"issue":"13","key":"b23","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E775","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000001957","article-title":"Does lordotic angle of cage determine lumbar lordosis in lumbar interbody fusion?","volume":"42","author":"Hong TH","year":"2017","unstructured":"Hong TH, Cho KJ, Kim YT,  Does lordotic angle of cage determine lumbar lordosis in lumbar interbody fusion? Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017;42(13):E775\u2013E780.10.1097\/BRS.0000000000001957"},{"issue":"4","key":"b24","series-title":"Clin Spine Surg","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E338","DOI":"10.1097\/BSD.0000000000000114","article-title":"Do lordotic cages provide better segmental lordosis versus nonlordotic cages in lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF)?","volume":"30","author":"Sembrano JN","year":"2017","unstructured":"Sembrano JN, Horazdovsky RD, Sharma AK,  Do lordotic cages provide better segmental lordosis versus nonlordotic cages in lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF)? Clin Spine Surg. 2017;30(4):E338\u2013E343.10.1097\/BSD.000000000000011428437335"},{"issue":"5","key":"b25","series-title":"Neurosurgery","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"955","DOI":"10.1227\/01.NEU.0000343544.77456.46","article-title":"Radiographic restoration of lumbar alignment after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion","volume":"64","author":"Jagannathan J","year":"2009","unstructured":"Jagannathan J, Sansur CA, Oskouian RJ Jr,  Radiographic restoration of lumbar alignment after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Neurosurgery. 2009;64(5):955\u2013964.10.1227\/01.NEU.0000343544.77456.4619404155"},{"issue":"1","key":"b26","series-title":"HSS J","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"46","DOI":"10.1007\/s11420-019-09677-z","article-title":"Static versus expandable devices provide similar clinical outcomes following minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion","volume":"16","author":"Khechen B","year":"2020","unstructured":"Khechen B, Haws BE, Patel DV,  Static versus expandable devices provide similar clinical outcomes following minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. HSS J. 2020;16(1):46\u201353.10.1007\/s11420-019-09677-z32015740"},{"issue":"1","key":"b27","series-title":"J Neurosurg Spine","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"92","DOI":"10.3171\/2011.3.SPINE10425","article-title":"Changes in coronal and sagittal plane alignment following minimally invasive direct lateral interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar disease in adults: a radiographic study","volume":"15","author":"Acosta FL","year":"2011","unstructured":"Acosta FL, Liu J, Slimack N,  Changes in coronal and sagittal plane alignment following minimally invasive direct lateral interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar disease in adults: a radiographic study. J Neurosurg Spine. 2011;15(1):92\u201396.10.3171\/2011.3.SPINE1042521476802"},{"issue":"4","key":"b28","series-title":"J Spinal Disord Tech","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"242","DOI":"10.1097\/BSD.0b013e3181ecf995","article-title":"Lateral lumbar interbody fusion: clinical and radiographic outcomes at 1 year: a preliminary report","volume":"24","author":"Sharma AK","year":"2011","unstructured":"Sharma AK, Kepler CK, Girardi FP,  Lateral lumbar interbody fusion: clinical and radiographic outcomes at 1 year: a preliminary report. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2011;24(4):242\u2013250.10.1097\/BSD.0b013e3181ecf99520844451"},{"issue":"5","key":"b29","series-title":"Neurosurg Focus","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E14","DOI":"10.3171\/2014.3.FOCUS13585","article-title":"Limitations and ceiling effects with circumferential minimally invasive correction techniques for adult scoliosis: analysis of radiological outcomes over a 7-year experience","volume":"36","author":"Anand N","year":"2014","unstructured":"Anand N, Baron EM, Khandehroo B. Limitations and ceiling effects with circumferential minimally invasive correction techniques for adult scoliosis: analysis of radiological outcomes over a 7-year experience. Neurosurg Focus. 2014;36(5):E14.10.3171\/2014.3.FOCUS13585"},{"issue":"3","key":"b30","series-title":"Neurosurg Clin N Am","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"399","DOI":"10.1016\/j.nec.2018.03.007","article-title":"Evolution of the minimally invasive spinal deformity surgery algorithm: an evidence-based approach to surgical strategies for deformity correction","volume":"29","author":"Choy W","year":"2018","unstructured":"Choy W, Miller CA, Chan AK,  Evolution of the minimally invasive spinal deformity surgery algorithm: an evidence-based approach to surgical strategies for deformity correction. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2018;29(3):399\u2013406.2993380710.1016\/j.nec.2018.03.007"},{"key":"b31","series-title":"World Neurosurg","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e379","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2018.11.174","article-title":"Anterior column realignment in adult spinal deformity: a case report and review of the literature","volume":"123","author":"Cheung ZB","year":"2019","unstructured":"Cheung ZB, Chen DH, White SJW,  Anterior column realignment in adult spinal deformity: a case report and review of the literature. World Neurosurg. 2019;123:e379\u2013e386.10.1016\/j.wneu.2018.11.17430500589"},{"key":"b32","series-title":"World Neurosurg","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"216","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2017.01.114","article-title":"Comparison of outcomes of anterior, posterior, and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion surgery at a single lumbar level with degenerative spinal disease","volume":"101","author":"Lee N","year":"2017","unstructured":"Lee N, Kim KN, Yi S,  Comparison of outcomes of anterior, posterior, and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion surgery at a single lumbar level with degenerative spinal disease. World Neurosurg. 2017;101:216\u2013226.10.1016\/j.wneu.2017.01.114"},{"issue":"6","key":"b33","series-title":"J Neurosurg Spine","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"650","DOI":"10.3171\/2017.5.SPINE16926","article-title":"Overpowering posterior lumbar instrumentation and fusion with hyperlordotic anterior lumbar interbody cages followed by posterior revision: a preliminary feasibility study","volume":"27","author":"Kadam A","year":"2017","unstructured":"Kadam A, Wigner N, Saville P, Arlet V. Overpowering posterior lumbar instrumentation and fusion with hyperlordotic anterior lumbar interbody cages followed by posterior revision: a preliminary feasibility study. J Neurosurg Spine. 2017;27(6):650\u2013660.2896016010.3171\/2017.5.SPINE16926"},{"issue":"4","key":"b34","series-title":"J Spinal Disord Tech","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"332","DOI":"10.1097\/01.bsd.0000163037.17634.89","article-title":"Comparison of sagittal contour and posterior disc height following interbody fusion: threaded cylindrical cages versus structural allograft versus vertical cages","volume":"18","author":"Groth AT","year":"2005","unstructured":"Groth AT, Kuklo TR, Klemme WR,  Comparison of sagittal contour and posterior disc height following interbody fusion: threaded cylindrical cages versus structural allograft versus vertical cages. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2005;18(4):332\u2013336.1602101410.1097\/01.bsd.0000163037.17634.89"},{"issue":"5","key":"b35","series-title":"J Neurosurg Spine","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"486","DOI":"10.3171\/2017.8.SPINE161231","article-title":"Do intraoperative radiographs predict final lumbar sagittal alignment following single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion?","volume":"28","author":"Salem KMI","year":"2018","unstructured":"Salem KMI, Eranki AP, Paquette S,  Do intraoperative radiographs predict final lumbar sagittal alignment following single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion? J Neurosurg Spine. 2018;28(5):486\u2013491.2945143710.3171\/2017.8.SPINE161231"}],"container-title":["Neurosurgical Focus"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/thejns.org\/view\/journals\/neurosurg-focus\/49\/3\/article-pE17.xml","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/thejns.org\/downloadpdf\/journals\/neurosurg-focus\/49\/3\/article-pE17.xml","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"syndication"},{"URL":"https:\/\/thejns.org\/downloadpdf\/journals\/neurosurg-focus\/49\/3\/article-pE17.xml","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,30]],"date-time":"2026-05-30T08:35:03Z","timestamp":1780130103000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/thejns.org\/view\/journals\/neurosurg-focus\/49\/3\/article-pE17.xml"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,9]]},"references-count":70,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3"},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3171\/2020.6.focus20393","relation":{},"ISSN":["1092-0684"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1092-0684","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,9]]}}}