{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,21]],"date-time":"2026-07-21T07:40:07Z","timestamp":1784619607752,"version":"3.55.0"},"reference-count":37,"publisher":"Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG)","issue":"4","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,4,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n<jats:title>OBJECTIVE<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>Spinal anesthesia (SA) is an alternative to general anesthesia (GA) for lumbar spine surgery, including complex instrumented fusion, although there are relatively few outcome data available. The authors discuss their experience using SA in a modern complex lumbar spine surgery practice to describe its utility and implementation.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>\n<jats:sec>\n<jats:title>METHODS<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>Data from patients receiving SA for lumbar spine surgery by one surgeon from March 2017 to December 2020 were collected via a retrospective chart review. Cases were divided into nonfusion and fusion procedure categories and analyzed for demographics and baseline medical status; pre-, intra-, and postoperative events; hospital course, including Acute Pain Service (APS) consults; and follow-up visit outcome data.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>\n<jats:sec>\n<jats:title>RESULTS<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>A total of 345 consecutive lumbar spine procedures were found, with 343 records complete for analysis, including 181 fusion and 162 nonfusion procedures and spinal levels from T11 through S1. The fusion group was significantly older (mean age 65.9 \u00b1 12.4 vs 59.5 \u00b1 15.4 years, p &lt; 0.001) and had a significantly higher proportion of patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status Classification class III (p = 0.009) than the nonfusion group. There were no intraoperative conversions to GA, with infrequent need for a second dose of SA preoperatively (2.9%, 10\/343) and rare preoperative conversion to GA (0.6%, 2\/343) across fusion and nonfusion groups. Rates of complications during hospitalization were comparable to those seen in the literature. The APS was consulted for 2.9% (10\/343) of procedures. An algorithm for the integration of SA into a lumbar spine surgery practice, from surgical and anesthetic perspectives, is also offered.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>\n<jats:sec>\n<jats:title>CONCLUSIONS <\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>SA is a viable, safe, and effective option for lumbar spine surgery across a wide range of age and health statuses, particularly in older patients and those who want to avoid GA. The authors\u2019 protocol, based in part on the largest set of data currently available describing complex instrumented fusion surgeries of the lumbar spine completed under SA, presents guidance and best practices to integrate SA into contemporary lumbar spine practices.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.3171\/2021.7.spine21847","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,11,5]],"date-time":"2021-11-05T07:28:42Z","timestamp":1636097322000},"page":"534-541","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":32,"title":["Spinal anesthesia in contemporary and complex lumbar spine surgery: experience with 343 cases"],"prefix":"10.3171","volume":"36","author":[{"given":"Jeffrey M.","family":"Breton","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Neurosurgery, Tufts Medical Center, Boston;"},{"name":"Department of Neurosurgery, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston; and"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Calvin G.","family":"Ludwig","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Neurosurgery, Tufts Medical Center, Boston;"},{"name":"Department of Neurosurgery, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston; and"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Michael J.","family":"Yang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Neurosurgery, Tufts Medical Center, Boston;"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"T. Jayde","family":"Nail","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Neurosurgery, Tufts Medical Center, Boston;"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ron I.","family":"Riesenburger","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Neurosurgery, Tufts Medical Center, Boston;"},{"name":"Department of Neurosurgery, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston; and"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Penny","family":"Liu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Anesthesiology, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"James T","family":"Kryzanski","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Neurosurgery, Tufts Medical Center, Boston;"},{"name":"Department of Neurosurgery, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston; and"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1754","reference":[{"issue":"3","key":"b1","series-title":"Global Spine J","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"213","DOI":"10.1177\/2192568217694151","article-title":"Impact of the economic downturn on elective lumbar spine surgery in the united states: a national trend analysis,","volume":"7","author":"Bernstein DN","year":"2003 to 2013","unstructured":"Bernstein DN, \nBrodell D, \nLi Y, \nRubery PT, \nMesfin A\n. \nImpact of the economic downturn on elective lumbar spine surgery in the united states: a national trend analysis,. \n2003 to 2013.\nGlobal Spine J. \n2017;\n7(\n3):\n213\u2013\n219.\n10.1177\/2192568217694151"},{"issue":"13","key":"b2","series-title":"JAMA","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1259","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2010.338","article-title":"Trends, major medical complications, and charges associated with surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis in older adults","volume":"303","author":"Deyo RA","year":"2010","unstructured":"Deyo RA, \nMirza SK, \nMartin BI, \nKreuter W, \nGoodman DC, \nJarvik JG\n. \nTrends, major medical complications, and charges associated with surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis in older adults. \nJAMA. \n2010;\n303(\n13):\n1259\u2013\n1265.\n2037178410.1001\/jama.2010.338"},{"issue":"8","key":"b3","series-title":"N Engl J Med","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"794","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa0707136","article-title":"Surgical versus nonsurgical therapy for lumbar spinal stenosis","volume":"358","author":"Weinstein JN","year":"2008","unstructured":"Weinstein JN, \nTosteson TD, \nLurie JD, \nTosteson AN, \nBlood E, \nHanscom B, \n\n \nSurgical versus nonsurgical therapy for lumbar spinal stenosis. \nN Engl J Med. \n2008;\n358(\n8):\n794\u2013\n810.\n10.1056\/NEJMoa070713618287602"},{"issue":"1","key":"b4","series-title":"Adv Rheumatol","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"25","DOI":"10.1186\/s42358-021-00184-6","article-title":"Surgical treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis: a single-blinded randomized controlled trial","volume":"61","author":"Rodrigues LCL","year":"2021","unstructured":"Rodrigues LCL, \nNatour J\n. \nSurgical treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis: a single-blinded randomized controlled trial. \nAdv Rheumatol. \n2021;\n61(\n1):\n25.\n3398030910.1186\/s42358-021-00184-6"},{"issue":"6","key":"b5","series-title":"PLoS One","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e0217939","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0217939","article-title":"Spinal anesthesia for lumbar spine surgery correlates with fewer total medications and less frequent use of vasoactive agents: a single center experience","volume":"14","author":"Deng H","year":"2019","unstructured":"Deng H, \nCoumans JV, \nAnderson R, \nHoule TT, \nPeterfreund RA\n. \nSpinal anesthesia for lumbar spine surgery correlates with fewer total medications and less frequent use of vasoactive agents: a single center experience. \nPLoS One. \n2019;\n14(\n6):\ne0217939.\n3119477710.1371\/journal.pone.0217939"},{"key":"b6","first-page":"266","article-title":"Cost analysis of spinal versus general anesthesia for lumbar diskectomy and laminectomy spine surgery","volume":"89","author":"Agarwal P","year":"2016","unstructured":"Agarwal P, \nPierce J, \nWelch WC\n. \nCost analysis of spinal versus general anesthesia for lumbar diskectomy and laminectomy spine surgery. \nWorld Neurosurg.\n2016;\n89:\n266\u2013\n271.\n26875652"},{"issue":"3","key":"b7","series-title":"Anaesthesia","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"391","DOI":"10.1111\/anae.13702","article-title":"Impact of spinal anaesthesia vs. general anaesthesia on peri-operative outcome in lumbar spine surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised, controlled trials","volume":"72","author":"Meng T","year":"2017","unstructured":"Meng T, \nZhong Z, \nMeng L\n. \nImpact of spinal anaesthesia vs. general anaesthesia on peri-operative outcome in lumbar spine surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised, controlled trials. \nAnaesthesia. \n2017;\n72(\n3):\n391\u2013\n401.\n2777044810.1111\/anae.13702"},{"key":"b8","series-title":"Clin Neurol Neurosurg","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"39","DOI":"10.1016\/j.clineuro.2014.01.016","article-title":"Regional anesthesia versus general anesthesia for surgery on the lumbar spine: a review of the modern literature","volume":"119","author":"De Rojas JO","year":"2014","unstructured":"De Rojas JO, \nSyre P, \nWelch WC\n. \nRegional anesthesia versus general anesthesia for surgery on the lumbar spine: a review of the modern literature. \nClin Neurol Neurosurg. \n2014;\n119:\n39\u2013\n43.\n10.1016\/j.clineuro.2014.01.016"},{"issue":"1","key":"b9","series-title":"J Neurosurg Spine","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"17","DOI":"10.3171\/spi.2005.2.1.0017","article-title":"Comparison of spinal and general anesthesia in lumbar laminectomy surgery: a case-controlled analysis of 400 patients","volume":"2","author":"McLain RF","year":"2005","unstructured":"McLain RF, \nKalfas I, \nBell GR, \nTetzlaff JE, \nYoon HJ, \nRana M\n. \nComparison of spinal and general anesthesia in lumbar laminectomy surgery: a case-controlled analysis of 400 patients. \nJ Neurosurg Spine. \n2005;\n2(\n1):\n17\u2013\n22.\n10.3171\/spi.2005.2.1.001715658121"},{"issue":"4","key":"b10","series-title":"Br J Surg","first-page":"299","article-title":"Regional anaesthesia and surgical morbidity","volume":"75","author":"Scott NB","year":"1988","unstructured":"Scott NB, \nKehlet H\n. \nRegional anaesthesia and surgical morbidity. \nBr J Surg. \n1988;\n75(\n4):\n299\u2013\n304.\n3282596"},{"issue":"1","key":"b11","series-title":"Anesthesiology","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"18","DOI":"10.1097\/01.anes.0000296071.19434.1e","article-title":"Predictors of cognitive dysfunction after major noncardiac surgery","volume":"108","author":"Monk TG","year":"2008","unstructured":"Monk TG, \nWeldon BC, \nGarvan CW, \nDede DE, \nvan der Aa MT, \nHeilman KM, \nGravenstein JS\n. \nPredictors of cognitive dysfunction after major noncardiac surgery. \nAnesthesiology. \n2008;\n108(\n1):\n18\u2013\n30.\n10.1097\/01.anes.0000296071.19434.1e18156878"},{"issue":"9106","key":"b12","series-title":"Lancet","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"857","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(97)07382-0","article-title":"Long-term postoperative cognitive dysfunction in the elderly ISPOCD1 study","volume":"351","author":"Moller JT","year":"1998","unstructured":"Moller JT, \nCluitmans P, \nRasmussen LS, \nHoux P, \nRasmussen H, \nCanet J, \n\n \nLong-term postoperative cognitive dysfunction in the elderly ISPOCD1 study. \nLancet. \n1998;\n351(\n9106):\n857\u2013\n861.\n952536210.1016\/S0140-6736(97)07382-0"},{"key":"b13","series-title":"Neurosci Biobehav Rev","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"116","DOI":"10.1016\/j.neubiorev.2017.11.011","article-title":"Post-operative cognitive dysfunction: an exploration of the inflammatory hypothesis and novel therapies","volume":"84","author":"Skvarc DR","year":"2018","unstructured":"Skvarc DR, \nBerk M, \nByrne LK, \nDean OM, \nDodd S, \nLewis M, \n\n \nPost-operative cognitive dysfunction: an exploration of the inflammatory hypothesis and novel therapies. \nNeurosci Biobehav Rev. \n2018;\n84:\n116\u2013\n133.\n2918025910.1016\/j.neubiorev.2017.11.011"},{"issue":"5","key":"b14","series-title":"Pain Physician","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"495","DOI":"10.36076\/ppj\/2019.22.495","article-title":"The associations between cognitive dysfunction, stress biomarkers, and administered anesthesia type in total knee arthroplasties: prospective, randomized trial","volume":"22","author":"Edipoglu IS","year":"2019","unstructured":"Edipoglu IS, \nCelik F\n. \nThe associations between cognitive dysfunction, stress biomarkers, and administered anesthesia type in total knee arthroplasties: prospective, randomized trial. \nPain Physician. \n2019;\n22(\n5):\n495\u2013\n507.\n3156165110.36076\/ppj\/2019.22.495"},{"issue":"4","key":"b15","series-title":"Anesth Pain Med","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e101815","DOI":"10.5812\/aapm.101815","article-title":"Effect of general versus spinal anesthesia on postoperative delirium and early cognitive dysfunction in elderly patients","volume":"10","author":"Ehsani R","year":"2020","unstructured":"Ehsani R, \nDjalali Motlagh S, \nZaman B, \nSehat Kashani S, \nGhodraty MR\n. \nEffect of general versus spinal anesthesia on postoperative delirium and early cognitive dysfunction in elderly patients. \nAnesth Pain Med. \n2020;\n10(\n4):\ne101815.\n10.5812\/aapm.10181533134142"},{"issue":"suppl 3","key":"b16","series-title":"J Alzheimers Dis","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"67","DOI":"10.3233\/JAD-2010-101086","article-title":"The impact of general and regional anesthesia on the incidence of post-operative cognitive dysfunction and post-operative delirium: a systematic review with meta-analysis","volume":"22","author":"Mason SE","year":"2010","unstructured":"Mason SE, \nNoel-Storr A, \nRitchie CW\n. \nThe impact of general and regional anesthesia on the incidence of post-operative cognitive dysfunction and post-operative delirium: a systematic review with meta-analysis. \nJ Alzheimers Dis. \n2010;22(suppl 3):67\u201379.\n10.3233\/JAD-2010-10108620858956"},{"key":"b17","article-title":"ASA Physical Status Classification System. American Society of Anesthesiologists. Published online December 13,","year":"2020","unstructured":"ASA Physical Status Classification System. American Society of Anesthesiologists. Published online December 13,. \n2020.\nAccessed August 27, 2021.\nhttps:\/\/www.asahq.org\/standards-and-guidelines\/asa-physical-status-classification-system"},{"issue":"2","key":"b18","series-title":"Int Surg","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"292","DOI":"10.9738\/INTSURG-D-13-00256.1","article-title":"The prone position during surgery and its complications: a systematic review and evidence-based guidelines","volume":"100","author":"Kwee MM","year":"2015","unstructured":"Kwee MM, \nHo YH, \nRozen WM\n. \nThe prone position during surgery and its complications: a systematic review and evidence-based guidelines. \nInt Surg. \n2015;\n100(\n2):\n292\u2013\n303.\n10.9738\/INTSURG-D-13-00256.125692433"},{"issue":"3","key":"b19","series-title":"Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"323","DOI":"10.1016\/S1521-6896(02)00115-5","article-title":"Spinal anaesthesia for spinal surgery","volume":"17","author":"Jellish WS","year":"2003","unstructured":"Jellish WS, \nShea JF\n. \nSpinal anaesthesia for spinal surgery. \nBest Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. \n2003;\n17(\n3):\n323\u2013\n334.\n10.1016\/S1521-6896(02)00115-514529005"},{"issue":"1","key":"b20","series-title":"Br J Anaesth","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"48","DOI":"10.1093\/bja\/64.1.48","article-title":"Sedation during spinal anaesthesia: comparison of propofol and midazolam","volume":"64","author":"Wilson E","year":"1990","unstructured":"Wilson E, \nDavid A, \nMacKenzie N, \nGrant IS\n. \nSedation during spinal anaesthesia: comparison of propofol and midazolam. \nBr J Anaesth. \n1990;\n64(\n1):\n48\u2013\n52.\n10.1093\/bja\/64.1.482302376"},{"key":"b21","series-title":"J Clin Anesth","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinane.2018.01.004","article-title":"Spinal versus general anesthesia for lumbar spine surgery in high risk patients: Perioperative hemodynamic stability, complications and costs","volume":"46","author":"Finsterwald M","year":"2018","unstructured":"Finsterwald M, \nMuster M, \nFarshad M, \nSaporito A, \nBrada M, \nAguirre JA\n. \nSpinal versus general anesthesia for lumbar spine surgery in high risk patients: Perioperative hemodynamic stability, complications and costs. \nJ Clin Anesth. \n2018;\n46:\n3\u2013\n7.\n10.1016\/j.jclinane.2018.01.00429316474"},{"issue":"3","key":"b22","series-title":"J Clin Neurosci","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"539","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jocn.2014.08.024","article-title":"Cost analysis of spinal and general anesthesia for the surgical treatment of lumbar spondylosis","volume":"22","author":"Walcott BP","year":"2015","unstructured":"Walcott BP, \nKhanna A, \nYanamadala V, \nCoumans JV, \nPeterfreund RA\n. \nCost analysis of spinal and general anesthesia for the surgical treatment of lumbar spondylosis. \nJ Clin Neurosci. \n2015;\n22(\n3):\n539\u2013\n543.\n10.1016\/j.jocn.2014.08.02425510535"},{"issue":"5","key":"b23","series-title":"Int J Spine Surg","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"713","DOI":"10.14444\/7103","article-title":"Spinal anesthesia for geriatric lumbar spine surgery: a comparative case series","volume":"14","author":"Lessing NL","year":"2020","unstructured":"Lessing NL, \nEdwards CC II, \nDean CL, \nWaxter OH, \nLin C, \nCurto RA, \nBrown CH IV\n. \nSpinal anesthesia for geriatric lumbar spine surgery: a comparative case series. \nInt J Spine Surg. \n2020;\n14(\n5):\n713\u2013\n721.\n10.14444\/710333046538"},{"issue":"3","key":"b24","series-title":"Anesth Analg","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"559","DOI":"10.1213\/00000539-199609000-00021","article-title":"A prospective randomized study comparing short- and intermediate-term perioperative outcome variables after spinal or general anesthesia for lumbar disk and laminectomy surgery","volume":"83","author":"Jellish WS","year":"1996","unstructured":"Jellish WS, \nThalji Z, \nStevenson K, \nShea J\n. \nA prospective randomized study comparing short- and intermediate-term perioperative outcome variables after spinal or general anesthesia for lumbar disk and laminectomy surgery. \nAnesth Analg. \n1996;\n83(\n3):\n559\u2013\n564.\n10.1213\/00000539-199609000-00021"},{"issue":"4","key":"b25","series-title":"Neurosurg Focus","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E14","DOI":"10.3171\/2018.12.FOCUS18701","article-title":"Endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion without general anesthesia: operative and clinical outcomes in 100 consecutive patients with a minimum 1-year follow-up","volume":"46","author":"Kolcun JPG","year":"2019","unstructured":"Kolcun JPG, \nBrusko GD, \nBasil GW, \nEpstein R, \nWang MY\n. \nEndoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion without general anesthesia: operative and clinical outcomes in 100 consecutive patients with a minimum 1-year follow-up. \nNeurosurg Focus. \n2019;\n46(\n4):\nE14.\n3093391510.3171\/2018.12.FOCUS18701"},{"key":"b26","series-title":"Spinal Anesthesia","article-title":"The History of Anesthesiology","volume":"3","author":"Tait FD","unstructured":"Tait FD, \nCaglieri G, \nMatas R, \nJonnesco T\n. \nThe History of Anesthesiology. \nSpinal Anesthesia. Vol 3.\nWood Library-Museum of Anesthesiology; 1973. Accessed August 27, 2021.\nhttps:\/\/www.woodlibrarymuseum.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/e-books\/wlmrep_3_03pdf.pdf"},{"issue":"3","key":"b27","series-title":"J Anesth Hist","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"151","DOI":"10.1016\/j.janh.2020.07.005","article-title":"Anesthesia in the late 1960s at Peter Bent Brigham Hospital, Boston: a case report","volume":"6","author":"Pilon RN","year":"2020","unstructured":"Pilon RN, \nDesai SP\n. \nAnesthesia in the late 1960s at Peter Bent Brigham Hospital, Boston: a case report. \nJ Anesth Hist. \n2020;\n6(\n3):\n151\u2013\n155.\n10.1016\/j.janh.2020.07.00532921485"},{"issue":"5","key":"b28","first-page":"369","article-title":"Trends in lumbar fusion procedure rates and associated hospital costs for degenerative spinal diseases in the United States,","volume":"44","author":"Martin BI","year":"2004 to 2015","unstructured":"Martin BI, \nMirza SK, \nSpina N, \nSpiker WR, \nLawrence B, \nBrodke DS\n. \nTrends in lumbar fusion procedure rates and associated hospital costs for degenerative spinal diseases in the United States,. \n2004 to 2015.\nSpine (Phila Pa 1976).2019;\n44(\n5):\n369\u2013\n376."},{"key":"b29","series-title":"J Clin Orthop Trauma","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"122","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcot.2020.11.017","article-title":"Comparative outcome analysis of spinal anesthesia versus general anesthesia in lumbar fusion surgery","volume":"13","author":"Sekerak R","year":"2020","unstructured":"Sekerak R, \nMostafa E, \nMorris MT, \nNessim A, \nVira A, \nSharan A\n. \nComparative outcome analysis of spinal anesthesia versus general anesthesia in lumbar fusion surgery. \nJ Clin Orthop Trauma. \n2020;\n13:\n122\u2013\n126.\n10.1016\/j.jcot.2020.11.01733680810"},{"issue":"2","key":"b30","series-title":"Anesth Analg","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"496","DOI":"10.1213\/ANE.0000000000003514","article-title":"Postoperative cognitive dysfunction and noncardiac surgery","volume":"127","author":"Evered LA","year":"2018","unstructured":"Evered LA, \nSilbert BS\n. \nPostoperative cognitive dysfunction and noncardiac surgery. \nAnesth Analg. \n2018;\n127(\n2):\n496\u2013\n505.\n10.1213\/ANE.000000000000351429889707"},{"issue":"10","key":"b31","series-title":"J Am Geriatr Soc","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2101","DOI":"10.1111\/jgs.14434","article-title":"Delirium after spine surgery in older adults: incidence, risk factors, and outcomes","volume":"64","author":"Brown CH IV","year":"2016","unstructured":"Brown CH IV, \nLaFlam A, \nMax L, \nWyrobek J, \nNeufeld KJ, \nKebaish KM, \n\n \nDelirium after spine surgery in older adults: incidence, risk factors, and outcomes. \nJ Am Geriatr Soc. \n2016;\n64(\n10):\n2101\u2013\n2108.\n10.1111\/jgs.1443427696373"},{"issue":"4","key":"b32","series-title":"Anaesthesia","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"388","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2044.2010.06244.x","article-title":"Anaesthetics and postoperative cognitive dysfunction: a pathological mechanism mimicking Alzheimer\u2019s disease","volume":"65","author":"Fodale V","year":"2010","unstructured":"Fodale V, \nSantamaria LB, \nSchifilliti D, \nMandal PK\n. \nAnaesthetics and postoperative cognitive dysfunction: a pathological mechanism mimicking Alzheimer\u2019s disease. \nAnaesthesia. \n2010;\n65(\n4):\n388\u2013\n395.\n10.1111\/j.1365-2044.2010.06244.x20136805"},{"issue":"12","key":"b33","series-title":"BMJ Open","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e020757","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2017-020757","article-title":"Effect of regional versus general anaesthesia on postoperative delirium in elderly patients undergoing surgery for hip fracture: a systematic review","volume":"8","author":"Patel V","year":"2018","unstructured":"Patel V, \nChampaneria R, \nDretzke J, \nYeung J\n. \nEffect of regional versus general anaesthesia on postoperative delirium in elderly patients undergoing surgery for hip fracture: a systematic review. \nBMJ Open. \n2018;\n8(\n12):\ne020757.\n10.1136\/bmjopen-2017-02075730518580"},{"issue":"3","key":"b34","series-title":"J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"458","DOI":"10.1053\/j.jvca.2013.12.003","article-title":"Type of anesthesia and postoperative delirium after vascular surgery","volume":"28","author":"Ellard L","year":"2014","unstructured":"Ellard L, \nKatznelson R, \nWasowicz M, \nAshworth A, \nCarroll J, \nLindsay T, \nDjaiani G\n. \nType of anesthesia and postoperative delirium after vascular surgery. \nJ Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. \n2014;\n28(\n3):\n458\u2013\n461.\n10.1053\/j.jvca.2013.12.00324680130"},{"issue":"1","key":"b35","series-title":"BMC Anesthesiol","first-page":"192","article-title":"Shaping anesthetic techniques to reduce post-operative delirium (SHARP) study: a protocol for a prospective pragmatic randomized controlled trial to evaluate spinal anesthesia with targeted sedation compared with general anesthesia in older adults undergoing lumbar spine fusion surgery","volume":"19","author":"Brown CH IV","year":"2019","unstructured":"Brown CH IV, \nJones EL, \nLin C, \nEsmaili M, \nGorashi Y, \nSkelton RA, \n\n \nShaping anesthetic techniques to reduce post-operative delirium (SHARP) study: a protocol for a prospective pragmatic randomized controlled trial to evaluate spinal anesthesia with targeted sedation compared with general anesthesia in older adults undergoing lumbar spine fusion surgery. \nBMC Anesthesiol. \n2019;\n19(\n1):\n192.\n31656179"},{"key":"b36","series-title":"BioMed Res Int","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3234013","DOI":"10.1155\/2020\/3234013","article-title":"Relationship between surgery under general anesthesia and the development of dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"2020","author":"Lee JJ","year":"2020","unstructured":"Lee JJ, \nChoi GJ, \nKang H, \nBaek CW, \nJung YH, \nShin HY, \n\n \nRelationship between surgery under general anesthesia and the development of dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. \nBioMed Res Int. \n2020;\n2020:\n3234013.\n10.1155\/2020\/323401332337238"},{"issue":"3","key":"b37","series-title":"J Am Geriatr Soc","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"602","DOI":"10.1111\/jgs.14024","article-title":"Anesthesia exposure and risk of dementia and Alzheimer\u2019s disease: a prospective study","volume":"64","author":"Aiello Bowles EJ","year":"2016","unstructured":"Aiello Bowles EJ, \nLarson EB, \nPong RP, \nWalker RL, \nAnderson ML, \nYu O, \n\n \nAnesthesia exposure and risk of dementia and Alzheimer\u2019s disease: a prospective study. \nJ Am Geriatr Soc. \n2016;\n64(\n3):\n602\u2013\n607.\n10.1111\/jgs.14024"}],"container-title":["Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/thejns.org\/view\/journals\/j-neurosurg-spine\/36\/4\/article-p534.xml","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/thejns.org\/downloadpdf\/journals\/j-neurosurg-spine\/36\/4\/article-p534.xml","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"syndication"},{"URL":"https:\/\/thejns.org\/downloadpdf\/journals\/j-neurosurg-spine\/36\/4\/article-p534.xml","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,28]],"date-time":"2025-06-28T01:00:28Z","timestamp":1751072428000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/thejns.org\/view\/journals\/j-neurosurg-spine\/36\/4\/article-p534.xml"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,4,1]]},"references-count":37,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4"},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3171\/2021.7.spine21847","relation":{},"ISSN":["1547-5654"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1547-5654","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,4,1]]}}}