{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,29]],"date-time":"2026-10-29T18:15:01Z","timestamp":1793297701817,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":90,"publisher":"Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG)","issue":"5","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>OBJECTIVE<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The Spinal Laminectomy Versus Instrumented Pedicle Screw trial reported the superiority of fusion compared to laminectomy alone for patients with grade 1 degenerative spondylolisthesis. However, it remains unclear if the advantages of fusion extend to using minimally invasive surgical (MIS) techniques. This study compared 60-month outcomes following minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) versus decompression for grade 1 spondylolisthesis.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>METHODS<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The authors analyzed patients who underwent single-segment MIS TLIF or MIS tubular decompression for grade 1 degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis from the prospective Quality Outcomes Database\u2019s 12 highest enrolling sites (SpineCORe team). Uni- and multivariable analyses compared outcomes including the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), numeric rating scale (NRS) for back pain (NRS-BP), NRS for leg pain (NRS-LP), EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D), North American Spine Society (NASS) satisfaction score, and cumulative related reoperation rate.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>RESULTS<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Of 608 total patients, 143 underwent MIS TLIF (n = 72, 50.3%) or MIS decompression (n = 71, 49.7%). The overall study cohort\u2019s 60-month follow-up rate was 86.8%. The MIS TLIF cohort was significantly younger (mean 62.1 \u00b1 10.6 vs 72.3 \u00b1 9.7 years), had lower rates of diabetes (9.7% vs 22.5%), higher rates of private insurance utilization (65.3% vs 26.8%), was more likely to be employed preoperatively (54.2% vs 23.9%), and had higher baseline NRS-BP scores (mean 6.9 \u00b1 2.6 vs 5.6 \u00b1 3.2, p &lt; 0.05). Otherwise, the cohorts were similar in baseline characteristics. Sixty months postoperatively, both cohorts had significant mean improvements in ODI, NRS-LP, NRS-BP, and EQ-5D scores compared to their respective baselines (p &lt; 0.05). MIS TLIF had a significantly lower reoperation rate (2.8% vs 15.5%, p = 0.008). The minimal clinically important difference rates for the ODI, NRS-LP, NRS-BP, and EQ-5D were equivalent (p &gt; 0.05). MIS TLIF demonstrated significantly larger reductions in NRS-BP scores (\u22124.0 \u00b1 3.5 vs \u22122.2 \u00b1 3.4) and higher rates of satisfaction (NASS score 1 or 2 = 87.7% vs 74.5%; p &lt; 0.05) but similar absolute 60-month ODI, NRS-LP, NRS-BP, and EQ-5D scores (p &gt; 0.05). On multivariable analyses, fusion significantly reduced the odds of reoperation (OR 0.07, 95% CI 0.008\u20130.39; p = 0.006), but fusion status was neither a significant predictor of ODI, NRS-LP, NRS-BP, or EQ-5D scores, nor NASS satisfaction scores.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>CONCLUSIONS<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Regardless of the surgical approach, a dorsal-based MIS technique was associated with clinical benefits in patients with grade 1 spondylolisthesis. These 60-month results demonstrate that MIS TLIF and MIS decompression are associated with similar patient-reported outcomes. However, MIS TLIF is associated with significantly fewer reoperations.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.3171\/2025.5.spine25324","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,12]],"date-time":"2025-09-12T14:34:56Z","timestamp":1757687696000},"page":"547-556","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["Five-year follow-up after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus decompression alone for grade 1 spondylolisthesis: are there any differences in outcomes?"],"prefix":"10.3171","volume":"43","author":[{"given":"Andrew K.","family":"Chan","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Neurological Surgery, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, The Och Spine Hospital at NewYork-Presbyterian, New York, New York;"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Vardhaan S.","family":"Ambati","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, San Francisco, California;"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Pavan","family":"Upadhyayula","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Neurological Surgery, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, The Och Spine Hospital at NewYork-Presbyterian, New York, New York;"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Dean","family":"Chou","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Neurological Surgery, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, The Och Spine Hospital at NewYork-Presbyterian, New York, New York;"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Mohamad","family":"Bydon","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Chicago, Illinois;"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Erica F.","family":"Bisson","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Neurosurgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah;"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Steven D.","family":"Glassman","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Norton Leatherman Spine Center, Louisville, Kentucky;"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Kevin T.","family":"Foley","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Neurosurgery, University of Tennessee, Semmes-Murphey Neurologic and Spine Institute, Memphis, Tennessee;"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Christopher I.","family":"Shaffrey","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina;"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Eric A.","family":"Potts","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Goodman Campbell Brain and Spine, Indianapolis, Indiana;"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Chun-Po","family":"Yen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia;"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Domagoj","family":"Coric","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Neuroscience Institute, Carolinas Healthcare System and Carolina Neurosurgery & Spine Associates, Charlotte, North Carolina;"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"John J.","family":"Knightly","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Maxim Spine, Morristown, New Jersey;"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Paul","family":"Park","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Neurosurgery, University of Tennessee, Semmes-Murphey Neurologic and Spine Institute, Memphis, Tennessee;"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Michael Y.","family":"Wang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Neurosurgery, University of Miami, Florida;"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Kai-Ming","family":"Fu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Neurosurgery, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York;"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jonathan R.","family":"Slotkin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Neurosurgery, Geisinger Health, Danville, Pennsylvania; and"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Anthony L.","family":"Asher","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Neuroscience Institute, Carolinas Healthcare System and Carolina Neurosurgery & Spine Associates, Charlotte, North Carolina;"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Michael S.","family":"Virk","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Neurosurgery, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York;"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Regis W.","family":"Haid","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Atlanta Brain and Spine Care, Atlanta, Georgia"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Praveen V.","family":"Mummaneni","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, San Francisco, California;"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1754","reference":[{"issue":"2","key":"b1","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","first-page":"199","article-title":"Spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis: prevalence and association with low back pain in the adult community-based population","volume":"34","author":"Kalichman L","year":"2009","unstructured":"Kalichman L, Kim DH, Li L, Guermazi A, Berkin V, Hunter DJ. Spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis: prevalence and association with low back pain in the adult community-based population. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009;34(2):199\u2013205."},{"issue":"22","key":"b2","series-title":"N Engl J Med","first-page":"2257","article-title":"Surgical versus nonsurgical treatment for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis","volume":"356","author":"Weinstein JN","year":"2007","unstructured":"Weinstein JN, Lurie JD, Tosteson TD,  Surgical versus nonsurgical treatment for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(22):2257\u20132270."},{"issue":"2","key":"b3","series-title":"J Neurosurg Spine","first-page":"234","article-title":"Laminectomy alone versus fusion for grade 1 lumbar spondylolisthesis in 426 patients from the prospective Quality Outcomes Database","volume":"30","author":"Chan AK","year":"2019","unstructured":"Chan AK, Bisson EF, Bydon M,  Laminectomy alone versus fusion for grade 1 lumbar spondylolisthesis in 426 patients from the prospective Quality Outcomes Database. J Neurosurg Spine. 2019;30(2):234\u2013241."},{"issue":"1","key":"b4","series-title":"J Neurosurg Spine","first-page":"42","article-title":"Patient-reported outcome improvements at 24-month follow-up after fusion added to decompression for grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a multicenter study using the Quality Outcomes Database","volume":"35","author":"Bisson EF","year":"2021","unstructured":"Bisson EF, Guan J, Bydon M,  Patient-reported outcome improvements at 24-month follow-up after fusion added to decompression for grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a multicenter study using the Quality Outcomes Database. J Neurosurg Spine. 2021;35(1):42\u201351."},{"issue":"15","key":"b5","series-title":"N Engl J Med","first-page":"1424","article-title":"Laminectomy plus fusion versus laminectomy alone for lumbar spondylolisthesis","volume":"374","author":"Ghogawala Z","year":"2016","unstructured":"Ghogawala Z, Dziura J, Butler WE,  Laminectomy plus fusion versus laminectomy alone for lumbar spondylolisthesis. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(15):1424\u20131434."},{"issue":"3","key":"b6","series-title":"J Neurosurg Spine","first-page":"267","article-title":"Prospective outcomes evaluation after decompression with or without instrumented fusion for lumbar stenosis and degenerative Grade I spondylolisthesis","volume":"1","author":"Ghogawala Z","year":"2004","unstructured":"Ghogawala Z, Benzel EC, Amin-Hanjani S,  Prospective outcomes evaluation after decompression with or without instrumented fusion for lumbar stenosis and degenerative Grade I spondylolisthesis. J Neurosurg Spine. 2004;1(3):267\u2013272."},{"issue":"5","key":"b7","series-title":"Neurosurg Focus","first-page":"E13","article-title":"A comparison of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and decompression alone for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis","volume":"46","author":"Chan AK","year":"2019","unstructured":"Chan AK, Bisson EF, Bydon M,  A comparison of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and decompression alone for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. Neurosurg Focus. 2019;46(5):E13."},{"issue":"5","key":"b8","series-title":"Neurosurg Focus","first-page":"E12","article-title":"Predictive model for long-term patient satisfaction after surgery for grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: insights from the Quality Outcomes Database","volume":"46","author":"Mummaneni PV","year":"2019","unstructured":"Mummaneni PV, Bydon M, Alvi MA,  Predictive model for long-term patient satisfaction after surgery for grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: insights from the Quality Outcomes Database. Neurosurg Focus. 2019;46(5):E12."},{"issue":"4","key":"b9","series-title":"J Neurosurg Spine","first-page":"339","article-title":"Minimally invasive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis in patients with and without preoperative spondylolisthesis: clinical outcome and reoperation rates","volume":"22","author":"Alimi M","year":"2015","unstructured":"Alimi M, Hofstetter CP, Pyo SY, Paulo D, H\u00e4rtl R. Minimally invasive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis in patients with and without preoperative spondylolisthesis: clinical outcome and reoperation rates. J Neurosurg Spine. 2015;22(4):339\u2013352."},{"issue":"5","key":"b10","series-title":"J Neurosurg","first-page":"793","article-title":"Clinical outcomes and radiological instability following decompressive lumbar laminectomy for degenerative spinal stenosis: a comparison of patients undergoing concomitant arthrodesis versus decompression alone","volume":"85","author":"Fox MW","year":"1996","unstructured":"Fox MW, Onofrio BM, Onofrio BM, Hanssen AD. Clinical outcomes and radiological instability following decompressive lumbar laminectomy for degenerative spinal stenosis: a comparison of patients undergoing concomitant arthrodesis versus decompression alone. J Neurosurg. 1996;85(5):793\u2013802."},{"issue":"3","key":"b11","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","first-page":"382","article-title":"Reoperation rates following lumbar spine surgery and the influence of spinal fusion procedures","volume":"32","author":"Martin BI","year":"2007","unstructured":"Martin BI, Mirza SK, Comstock BA, Gray DT, Kreuter W, Deyo RA. Reoperation rates following lumbar spine surgery and the influence of spinal fusion procedures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007;32(3):382\u2013387."},{"issue":"1","key":"b12","series-title":"Neurosurg Focus","first-page":"E2","article-title":"Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for grade I lumbar spondylolisthesis: 5-year follow-up from the prospective multicenter Quality Outcomes Database registry","volume":"54","author":"Chan AK","year":"2023","unstructured":"Chan AK, Bydon M, Bisson EF,  Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for grade I lumbar spondylolisthesis: 5-year follow-up from the prospective multicenter Quality Outcomes Database registry. Neurosurg Focus. 2023;54(1):E2."},{"issue":"5","key":"b13","series-title":"Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown)","first-page":"E452","article-title":"Ten-step minimally invasive treatment of lumbar giant disc herniation via unilateral tubular laminotomy for bilateral decompression: 2-dimensional operative video","volume":"21","author":"Kirnaz S","year":"2021","unstructured":"Kirnaz S, Kocharian G, Sommer F, McGrath LB, Goldberg JL, H\u00e4rtl R. Ten-step minimally invasive treatment of lumbar giant disc herniation via unilateral tubular laminotomy for bilateral decompression: 2-dimensional operative video. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2021;21(5):E452\u2013E453."},{"issue":"1","key":"b14","series-title":"Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown)","first-page":"E9","article-title":"Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using 3-dimensional total navigation: 2-dimensional operative video","volume":"18","author":"Kirnaz S","year":"2020","unstructured":"Kirnaz S, Navarro-Ramirez R, Wipplinger C,  Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using 3-dimensional total navigation: 2-dimensional operative video. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2020;18(1):E9\u2013E10."},{"issue":"6","key":"b15","series-title":"J Neurosurg Spine","first-page":"560","article-title":"Clinical and radiographic comparison of mini-open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in 42 patients with long-term follow-up","volume":"9","author":"Dhall SS","year":"2008","unstructured":"Dhall SS, Wang MY, Mummaneni PV. Clinical and radiographic comparison of mini-open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in 42 patients with long-term follow-up. J Neurosurg Spine. 2008;9(6):560\u2013565."},{"issue":"2","key":"b16","series-title":"J Spine Surg","first-page":"190","article-title":"Percutaneous lumbar interbody fusion results in less perioperative opioid usage compared to minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a single institution, multi-surgeon retrospective study","volume":"10","author":"Shalita C","year":"2024","unstructured":"Shalita C, Wang T, Dibble CF,  Percutaneous lumbar interbody fusion results in less perioperative opioid usage compared to minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a single institution, multi-surgeon retrospective study. J Spine Surg. 2024;10(2):190\u2013203."},{"issue":"3","key":"b17","series-title":"Neurosurgery","first-page":"555","article-title":"A comparison of minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for grade 1 degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: an analysis of the prospective quality outcomes database","volume":"87","author":"Chan AK","year":"2020","unstructured":"Chan AK, Bisson EF, Bydon M,  A comparison of minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for grade 1 degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: an analysis of the prospective quality outcomes database. Neurosurgery. 2020;87(3):555\u2013562."},{"issue":"3S","key":"b18","series-title":"Neurosurgery","first-page":"S33","article-title":"Evolution of the minimally invasive surgery transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: where are we now?","volume":"96","author":"Dada A","year":"2025","unstructured":"Dada A, Saggi S, Ambati VS, Patel A, Mummaneni PV. Evolution of the minimally invasive surgery transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: where are we now? Neurosurgery. 2025;96(3S):S33\u2013S41."},{"issue":"1","key":"b19","series-title":"Neurosurg Focus","first-page":"E2","article-title":"The National Neurosurgery Quality and Outcomes Database and NeuroPoint Alliance: rationale, development, and implementation","volume":"34","author":"Asher AL","year":"2013","unstructured":"Asher AL, McCormick PC, Selden NR, Ghogawala Z, McGirt MJ. The National Neurosurgery Quality and Outcomes Database and NeuroPoint Alliance: rationale, development, and implementation. Neurosurg Focus. 2013;34(1):E2."},{"issue":"5","key":"b20","series-title":"Neurosurg Focus","first-page":"E2","article-title":"Quality Outcomes Database Spine Care Project 2012-2020: milestones achieved in a collaborative North American outcomes registry to advance value-based spine care and evolution to the American Spine Registry","volume":"48","author":"Asher AL","year":"2020","unstructured":"Asher AL, Knightly J, Mummaneni PV,  Quality Outcomes Database Spine Care Project 2012-2020: milestones achieved in a collaborative North American outcomes registry to advance value-based spine care and evolution to the American Spine Registry. Neurosurg Focus. 2020;48(5):E2."},{"issue":"2","key":"b21","series-title":"Neurosurg Focus","first-page":"E11","article-title":"Minimally invasive versus open fusion for Grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: analysis of the Quality Outcomes Database","volume":"43","author":"Mummaneni PV","year":"2017","unstructured":"Mummaneni PV, Bisson EF, Kerezoudis P,  Minimally invasive versus open fusion for Grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: analysis of the Quality Outcomes Database. Neurosurg Focus. 2017;43(2):E11."},{"issue":"1","key":"b22","series-title":"Neurosurg Focus","first-page":"E6","article-title":"The National Neurosurgery Quality and Outcomes Database (N2QOD): general overview and pilot-year project description","volume":"34","author":"McGirt MJ","year":"2013","unstructured":"McGirt MJ, Speroff T, Dittus RS, Harrell FE, Asher AL. The National Neurosurgery Quality and Outcomes Database (N2QOD): general overview and pilot-year project description. Neurosurg Focus. 2013;34(1):E6."},{"issue":"6","key":"b23","series-title":"J Neurosurg Spine","first-page":"916","article-title":"Modeled cost-effectiveness of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion compared with posterolateral fusion for spondylolisthesis using N(2)QOD data","volume":"24","author":"Carreon LY","year":"2016","unstructured":"Carreon LY, Glassman SD, Ghogawala Z, Mummaneni PV, McGirt MJ, Asher AL. Modeled cost-effectiveness of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion compared with posterolateral fusion for spondylolisthesis using N(2)QOD data. J Neurosurg Spine. 2016;24(6):916\u2013921."},{"key":"b24","article-title":"The National Neurosurgery Quality and Outcomes Database (N2QOD): a collaborative North American outcomes registry to advance value-based spine care","author":"Asher AL","unstructured":"Asher AL, Speroff T, Dittus RS,  The National Neurosurgery Quality and Outcomes Database (N2QOD): a collaborative North American outcomes registry to advance value-based spine care. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014;39(22 Suppl 1):S106-S116."},{"issue":"7","key":"b25","series-title":"Spine J","first-page":"922","article-title":"Is the use of minimally invasive fusion technologies associated with improved outcomes after elective interbody lumbar fusion? Analysis of a nationwide prospective patient-reported outcomes registry","volume":"17","author":"McGirt MJ","year":"2017","unstructured":"McGirt MJ, Parker SL, Mummaneni P,  Is the use of minimally invasive fusion technologies associated with improved outcomes after elective interbody lumbar fusion? Analysis of a nationwide prospective patient-reported outcomes registry. Spine J. 2017;17(7):922\u2013932."},{"issue":"2","key":"b26","series-title":"J Neurosurg Spine","first-page":"182","article-title":"Leveraging machine learning to ascertain the implications of preoperative body mass index on surgical outcomes for 282 patients with preoperative obesity and lumbar spondylolisthesis in the Quality Outcomes Database","volume":"38","author":"Agarwal N","year":"2023","unstructured":"Agarwal N, Aabedi AA, Chan AK,  Leveraging machine learning to ascertain the implications of preoperative body mass index on surgical outcomes for 282 patients with preoperative obesity and lumbar spondylolisthesis in the Quality Outcomes Database. J Neurosurg Spine. 2023;38(2):182\u2013191."},{"issue":"1","key":"b27","series-title":"Neurosurg Focus","first-page":"E3","article-title":"Women fare best following surgery for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a comparison of the most and least satisfied patients utilizing data from the Quality Outcomes Database","volume":"44","author":"Chan AK","year":"2018","unstructured":"Chan AK, Bisson EF, Bydon M,  Women fare best following surgery for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a comparison of the most and least satisfied patients utilizing data from the Quality Outcomes Database. Neurosurg Focus. 2018;44(1):E3."},{"issue":"3","key":"b28","series-title":"J Neurosurg Spine","first-page":"349","article-title":"Open versus minimally invasive decompression for low-grade spondylolisthesis: analysis from the Quality Outcomes Database","volume":"33","author":"Bisson EF","year":"2020","unstructured":"Bisson EF, Mummaneni PV, Virk MS,  Open versus minimally invasive decompression for low-grade spondylolisthesis: analysis from the Quality Outcomes Database. J Neurosurg Spine. 2020;33(3):349\u2013359."},{"issue":"5","key":"b29","series-title":"Neurosurgery","first-page":"1037","article-title":"Impact of dominant symptom on 12-month patient-reported outcomes for patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery","volume":"87","author":"Devin CJ","year":"2020","unstructured":"Devin CJ, Asher AL, Archer KR,  Impact of dominant symptom on 12-month patient-reported outcomes for patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery. Neurosurgery. 2020;87(5):1037\u20131045."},{"issue":"4","key":"b30","series-title":"J Neurosurg Spine","first-page":"523","article-title":"Predictors of nonroutine discharge among patients undergoing surgery for grade I spondylolisthesis: insights from the Quality Outcomes Database","volume":"32","author":"Mummaneni PV","year":"2020","unstructured":"Mummaneni PV, Bydon M, Knightly J,  Predictors of nonroutine discharge among patients undergoing surgery for grade I spondylolisthesis: insights from the Quality Outcomes Database. J Neurosurg Spine. 2020;32(4):523\u2013532."},{"issue":"5","key":"b31","series-title":"Ann Med","first-page":"337","article-title":"EQ-5D: a measure of health status from the EuroQol Group","volume":"33","author":"Rabin R","year":"2001","unstructured":"Rabin R, de Charro F. EQ-5D: a measure of health status from the EuroQol Group. Ann Med. 2001;33(5):337\u2013343."},{"issue":"6","key":"b32","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","first-page":"741","article-title":"The North American spine society lumbar spine outcome assessment Instrument: reliability and validity tests","volume":"21","author":"Daltroy LH","year":"1996","unstructured":"Daltroy LH, Cats-Baril WL, Katz JN, Fossel AH, Liang MH. The North American spine society lumbar spine outcome assessment Instrument: reliability and validity tests. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996;21(6):741\u2013749."},{"issue":"1","key":"b33","series-title":"Neurosurg Focus","first-page":"E2","article-title":"Defining the minimum clinically important difference for grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: insights from the Quality Outcomes Database","volume":"44","author":"Asher AL","year":"2018","unstructured":"Asher AL, Kerezoudis P, Mummaneni PV,  Defining the minimum clinically important difference for grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: insights from the Quality Outcomes Database. Neurosurg Focus. 2018;44(1):E2."},{"issue":"26","key":"b34","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","first-page":"2287","article-title":"Reoperation and revision rates of 3 surgical treatment methods for lumbar stenosis associated with degenerative scoliosis and spondylolisthesis","volume":"38","author":"Brodke DS","year":"2013","unstructured":"Brodke DS, Annis P, Lawrence BD, Woodbury AM, Daubs MD. Reoperation and revision rates of 3 surgical treatment methods for lumbar stenosis associated with degenerative scoliosis and spondylolisthesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013;38(26):2287\u20132294."},{"issue":"20","key":"b35","series-title":"JAMA","first-page":"2441","article-title":"Surgical vs nonoperative treatment for lumbar disk herniation: the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT): a randomized trial","volume":"296","author":"Weinstein JN","year":"2006","unstructured":"Weinstein JN, Tosteson TD, Lurie JD,  Surgical vs nonoperative treatment for lumbar disk herniation: the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT): a randomized trial. JAMA. 2006;296(20):2441\u20132450."},{"issue":"6","key":"b36","series-title":"Neurosurg Focus","first-page":"E3","article-title":"Cost-effectiveness of lumbar discectomy and single-level fusion for spondylolisthesis: experience with the NeuroPoint-SD registry","volume":"36","author":"Mummaneni PV","year":"2014","unstructured":"Mummaneni PV, Whitmore RG, Curran JN,  Cost-effectiveness of lumbar discectomy and single-level fusion for spondylolisthesis: experience with the NeuroPoint-SD registry. Neurosurg Focus. 2014;36(6):E3."},{"issue":"3","key":"b37","series-title":"Neurosurgery","first-page":"355","article-title":"Lumbar spinal stenosis associated with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of secondary fusion rates following open vs minimally invasive decompression","volume":"80","author":"Sch\u00f6ller K","year":"2017","unstructured":"Sch\u00f6ller K, Alimi M, Cong GT, Christos P, H\u00e4rtl R. Lumbar spinal stenosis associated with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of secondary fusion rates following open vs minimally invasive decompression. Neurosurgery. 2017;80(3):355\u2013367."},{"key":"b38","series-title":"Front Bioeng Biotechnol","first-page":"1400508","article-title":"Effect of two-level decompressive procedures on the biomechanics of the lumbo-sacral spine: an ex vivo study","volume":"12","author":"Montanari S","year":"2024","unstructured":"Montanari S, Serchi E, Conti A, Barbanti Br\u00f2dano G, Stagni R, Cristofolini L. Effect of two-level decompressive procedures on the biomechanics of the lumbo-sacral spine: an ex vivo study. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024;12:1400508."},{"key":"b39","series-title":"BMC Musculoskelet Disord","first-page":"84","article-title":"Biomechanical comparison of lumbar spine instability between laminectomy and bilateral laminotomy for spinal stenosis syndrome - an experimental study in porcine model","volume":"9","author":"Tai CL","year":"2008","unstructured":"Tai CL, Hsieh PH, Chen WP, Chen LH, Chen WJ, Lai PL. Biomechanical comparison of lumbar spine instability between laminectomy and bilateral laminotomy for spinal stenosis syndrome - an experimental study in porcine model. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2008;9:84."},{"issue":"19","key":"b40","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","first-page":"1789","article-title":"The effect of bilateral laminotomy versus laminectomy on the motion and stiffness of the human lumbar spine: a biomechanical comparison","volume":"35","author":"Lee MJ","year":"2010","unstructured":"Lee MJ, Bransford RJ, Bellabarba C,  The effect of bilateral laminotomy versus laminectomy on the motion and stiffness of the human lumbar spine: a biomechanical comparison. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010;35(19):1789\u20131793."},{"issue":"5","key":"b41","series-title":"J Neurosurg Spine","first-page":"658","article-title":"Predictors of patient satisfaction after surgery for grade 1 degenerative spondylolisthesis: a 5-year analysis of the Quality Outcomes Database","volume":"41","author":"Dru A","year":"2024","unstructured":"Dru A, Johnson SE, Linzey JR,  Predictors of patient satisfaction after surgery for grade 1 degenerative spondylolisthesis: a 5-year analysis of the Quality Outcomes Database. J Neurosurg Spine. 2024;41(5):658\u2013665."},{"key":"b42","series-title":"BMJ","first-page":"e079771","article-title":"Decompression alone or with fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (Nordsten-DS): five year follow-up of a randomised, multicentre, non-inferiority trial","volume":"386","author":"Kgomotso EL","year":"2024","unstructured":"Kgomotso EL, Hellum C, Fagerland MW,  Decompression alone or with fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (Nordsten-DS): five year follow-up of a randomised, multicentre, non-inferiority trial. BMJ. 2024;386:e079771."},{"issue":"6","key":"b43","series-title":"N Engl J Med","first-page":"526","article-title":"Decompression with or without fusion in degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis","volume":"385","author":"Austevoll IM","year":"2021","unstructured":"Austevoll IM, Hermansen E, Fagerland MW,  Decompression with or without fusion in degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. N Engl J Med. 2021;385(6):526\u2013538."},{"issue":"1","key":"b44","series-title":"J Neurosurg Spine","first-page":"80","article-title":"Predictors of indirect neural decompression in minimally invasive transpsoas lateral lumbar interbody fusion","volume":"35","author":"Walker CT","year":"2021","unstructured":"Walker CT, Xu DS, Cole TS,  Predictors of indirect neural decompression in minimally invasive transpsoas lateral lumbar interbody fusion. J Neurosurg Spine. 2021;35(1):80\u201390."},{"issue":"1","key":"b45","series-title":"Neurosurgery","first-page":"173","article-title":"Fulfillment of patient expectations after spine surgery is critical to patient satisfaction: a cohort study of spine surgery patients","volume":"91","author":"Rampersaud YR","year":"2022","unstructured":"Rampersaud YR, Canizares M, Perruccio AV,  Fulfillment of patient expectations after spine surgery is critical to patient satisfaction: a cohort study of spine surgery patients. Neurosurgery. 2022;91(1):173\u2013181."},{"issue":"2","key":"b1","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","first-page":"199","article-title":"Spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis: prevalence and association with low back pain in the adult community-based population","volume":"34","author":"Kalichman L","year":"2009","unstructured":"Kalichman L, Kim DH, Li L, Guermazi A, Berkin V, Hunter DJ. Spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis: prevalence and association with low back pain in the adult community-based population. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009;34(2):199\u2013205."},{"issue":"22","key":"b2","series-title":"N Engl J Med","first-page":"2257","article-title":"Surgical versus nonsurgical treatment for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis","volume":"356","author":"Weinstein JN","year":"2007","unstructured":"Weinstein JN, Lurie JD, Tosteson TD,  Surgical versus nonsurgical treatment for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(22):2257\u20132270."},{"issue":"2","key":"b3","series-title":"J Neurosurg Spine","first-page":"234","article-title":"Laminectomy alone versus fusion for grade 1 lumbar spondylolisthesis in 426 patients from the prospective Quality Outcomes Database","volume":"30","author":"Chan AK","year":"2019","unstructured":"Chan AK, Bisson EF, Bydon M,  Laminectomy alone versus fusion for grade 1 lumbar spondylolisthesis in 426 patients from the prospective Quality Outcomes Database. J Neurosurg Spine. 2019;30(2):234\u2013241."},{"issue":"1","key":"b4","series-title":"J Neurosurg Spine","first-page":"42","article-title":"Patient-reported outcome improvements at 24-month follow-up after fusion added to decompression for grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a multicenter study using the Quality Outcomes Database","volume":"35","author":"Bisson EF","year":"2021","unstructured":"Bisson EF, Guan J, Bydon M,  Patient-reported outcome improvements at 24-month follow-up after fusion added to decompression for grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a multicenter study using the Quality Outcomes Database. J Neurosurg Spine. 2021;35(1):42\u201351."},{"issue":"15","key":"b5","series-title":"N Engl J Med","first-page":"1424","article-title":"Laminectomy plus fusion versus laminectomy alone for lumbar spondylolisthesis","volume":"374","author":"Ghogawala Z","year":"2016","unstructured":"Ghogawala Z, Dziura J, Butler WE,  Laminectomy plus fusion versus laminectomy alone for lumbar spondylolisthesis. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(15):1424\u20131434."},{"issue":"3","key":"b6","series-title":"J Neurosurg Spine","first-page":"267","article-title":"Prospective outcomes evaluation after decompression with or without instrumented fusion for lumbar stenosis and degenerative Grade I spondylolisthesis","volume":"1","author":"Ghogawala Z","year":"2004","unstructured":"Ghogawala Z, Benzel EC, Amin-Hanjani S,  Prospective outcomes evaluation after decompression with or without instrumented fusion for lumbar stenosis and degenerative Grade I spondylolisthesis. J Neurosurg Spine. 2004;1(3):267\u2013272."},{"issue":"5","key":"b7","series-title":"Neurosurg Focus","first-page":"E13","article-title":"A comparison of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and decompression alone for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis","volume":"46","author":"Chan AK","year":"2019","unstructured":"Chan AK, Bisson EF, Bydon M,  A comparison of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and decompression alone for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. Neurosurg Focus. 2019;46(5):E13."},{"issue":"5","key":"b8","series-title":"Neurosurg Focus","first-page":"E12","article-title":"Predictive model for long-term patient satisfaction after surgery for grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: insights from the Quality Outcomes Database","volume":"46","author":"Mummaneni PV","year":"2019","unstructured":"Mummaneni PV, Bydon M, Alvi MA,  Predictive model for long-term patient satisfaction after surgery for grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: insights from the Quality Outcomes Database. Neurosurg Focus. 2019;46(5):E12."},{"issue":"4","key":"b9","series-title":"J Neurosurg Spine","first-page":"339","article-title":"Minimally invasive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis in patients with and without preoperative spondylolisthesis: clinical outcome and reoperation rates","volume":"22","author":"Alimi M","year":"2015","unstructured":"Alimi M, Hofstetter CP, Pyo SY, Paulo D, H\u00e4rtl R. Minimally invasive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis in patients with and without preoperative spondylolisthesis: clinical outcome and reoperation rates. J Neurosurg Spine. 2015;22(4):339\u2013352."},{"issue":"5","key":"b10","series-title":"J Neurosurg","first-page":"793","article-title":"Clinical outcomes and radiological instability following decompressive lumbar laminectomy for degenerative spinal stenosis: a comparison of patients undergoing concomitant arthrodesis versus decompression alone","volume":"85","author":"Fox MW","year":"1996","unstructured":"Fox MW, Onofrio BM, Onofrio BM, Hanssen AD. Clinical outcomes and radiological instability following decompressive lumbar laminectomy for degenerative spinal stenosis: a comparison of patients undergoing concomitant arthrodesis versus decompression alone. J Neurosurg. 1996;85(5):793\u2013802."},{"issue":"3","key":"b11","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","first-page":"382","article-title":"Reoperation rates following lumbar spine surgery and the influence of spinal fusion procedures","volume":"32","author":"Martin BI","year":"2007","unstructured":"Martin BI, Mirza SK, Comstock BA, Gray DT, Kreuter W, Deyo RA. Reoperation rates following lumbar spine surgery and the influence of spinal fusion procedures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007;32(3):382\u2013387."},{"issue":"1","key":"b12","series-title":"Neurosurg Focus","first-page":"E2","article-title":"Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for grade I lumbar spondylolisthesis: 5-year follow-up from the prospective multicenter Quality Outcomes Database registry","volume":"54","author":"Chan AK","year":"2023","unstructured":"Chan AK, Bydon M, Bisson EF,  Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for grade I lumbar spondylolisthesis: 5-year follow-up from the prospective multicenter Quality Outcomes Database registry. Neurosurg Focus. 2023;54(1):E2."},{"issue":"5","key":"b13","series-title":"Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown)","first-page":"E452","article-title":"Ten-step minimally invasive treatment of lumbar giant disc herniation via unilateral tubular laminotomy for bilateral decompression: 2-dimensional operative video","volume":"21","author":"Kirnaz S","year":"2021","unstructured":"Kirnaz S, Kocharian G, Sommer F, McGrath LB, Goldberg JL, H\u00e4rtl R. Ten-step minimally invasive treatment of lumbar giant disc herniation via unilateral tubular laminotomy for bilateral decompression: 2-dimensional operative video. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2021;21(5):E452\u2013E453."},{"issue":"1","key":"b14","series-title":"Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown)","first-page":"E9","article-title":"Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using 3-dimensional total navigation: 2-dimensional operative video","volume":"18","author":"Kirnaz S","year":"2020","unstructured":"Kirnaz S, Navarro-Ramirez R, Wipplinger C,  Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using 3-dimensional total navigation: 2-dimensional operative video. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2020;18(1):E9\u2013E10."},{"issue":"6","key":"b15","series-title":"J Neurosurg Spine","first-page":"560","article-title":"Clinical and radiographic comparison of mini-open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in 42 patients with long-term follow-up","volume":"9","author":"Dhall SS","year":"2008","unstructured":"Dhall SS, Wang MY, Mummaneni PV. Clinical and radiographic comparison of mini-open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in 42 patients with long-term follow-up. J Neurosurg Spine. 2008;9(6):560\u2013565."},{"issue":"2","key":"b16","series-title":"J Spine Surg","first-page":"190","article-title":"Percutaneous lumbar interbody fusion results in less perioperative opioid usage compared to minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a single institution, multi-surgeon retrospective study","volume":"10","author":"Shalita C","year":"2024","unstructured":"Shalita C, Wang T, Dibble CF,  Percutaneous lumbar interbody fusion results in less perioperative opioid usage compared to minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a single institution, multi-surgeon retrospective study. J Spine Surg. 2024;10(2):190\u2013203."},{"issue":"3","key":"b17","series-title":"Neurosurgery","first-page":"555","article-title":"A comparison of minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for grade 1 degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: an analysis of the prospective quality outcomes database","volume":"87","author":"Chan AK","year":"2020","unstructured":"Chan AK, Bisson EF, Bydon M,  A comparison of minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for grade 1 degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: an analysis of the prospective quality outcomes database. Neurosurgery. 2020;87(3):555\u2013562."},{"issue":"3S","key":"b18","series-title":"Neurosurgery","first-page":"S33","article-title":"Evolution of the minimally invasive surgery transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: where are we now?","volume":"96","author":"Dada A","year":"2025","unstructured":"Dada A, Saggi S, Ambati VS, Patel A, Mummaneni PV. Evolution of the minimally invasive surgery transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: where are we now? Neurosurgery. 2025;96(3S):S33\u2013S41."},{"issue":"1","key":"b19","series-title":"Neurosurg Focus","first-page":"E2","article-title":"The National Neurosurgery Quality and Outcomes Database and NeuroPoint Alliance: rationale, development, and implementation","volume":"34","author":"Asher AL","year":"2013","unstructured":"Asher AL, McCormick PC, Selden NR, Ghogawala Z, McGirt MJ. The National Neurosurgery Quality and Outcomes Database and NeuroPoint Alliance: rationale, development, and implementation. Neurosurg Focus. 2013;34(1):E2."},{"issue":"5","key":"b20","series-title":"Neurosurg Focus","first-page":"E2","article-title":"Quality Outcomes Database Spine Care Project 2012-2020: milestones achieved in a collaborative North American outcomes registry to advance value-based spine care and evolution to the American Spine Registry","volume":"48","author":"Asher AL","year":"2020","unstructured":"Asher AL, Knightly J, Mummaneni PV,  Quality Outcomes Database Spine Care Project 2012-2020: milestones achieved in a collaborative North American outcomes registry to advance value-based spine care and evolution to the American Spine Registry. Neurosurg Focus. 2020;48(5):E2."},{"issue":"2","key":"b21","series-title":"Neurosurg Focus","first-page":"E11","article-title":"Minimally invasive versus open fusion for Grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: analysis of the Quality Outcomes Database","volume":"43","author":"Mummaneni PV","year":"2017","unstructured":"Mummaneni PV, Bisson EF, Kerezoudis P,  Minimally invasive versus open fusion for Grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: analysis of the Quality Outcomes Database. Neurosurg Focus. 2017;43(2):E11."},{"issue":"1","key":"b22","series-title":"Neurosurg Focus","first-page":"E6","article-title":"The National Neurosurgery Quality and Outcomes Database (N2QOD): general overview and pilot-year project description","volume":"34","author":"McGirt MJ","year":"2013","unstructured":"McGirt MJ, Speroff T, Dittus RS, Harrell FE, Asher AL. The National Neurosurgery Quality and Outcomes Database (N2QOD): general overview and pilot-year project description. Neurosurg Focus. 2013;34(1):E6."},{"issue":"6","key":"b23","series-title":"J Neurosurg Spine","first-page":"916","article-title":"Modeled cost-effectiveness of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion compared with posterolateral fusion for spondylolisthesis using N(2)QOD data","volume":"24","author":"Carreon LY","year":"2016","unstructured":"Carreon LY, Glassman SD, Ghogawala Z, Mummaneni PV, McGirt MJ, Asher AL. Modeled cost-effectiveness of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion compared with posterolateral fusion for spondylolisthesis using N(2)QOD data. J Neurosurg Spine. 2016;24(6):916\u2013921."},{"key":"b24","article-title":"The National Neurosurgery Quality and Outcomes Database (N2QOD): a collaborative North American outcomes registry to advance value-based spine care","author":"Asher AL","unstructured":"Asher AL, Speroff T, Dittus RS,  The National Neurosurgery Quality and Outcomes Database (N2QOD): a collaborative North American outcomes registry to advance value-based spine care. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014;39(22 Suppl 1):S106-S116."},{"issue":"7","key":"b25","series-title":"Spine J","first-page":"922","article-title":"Is the use of minimally invasive fusion technologies associated with improved outcomes after elective interbody lumbar fusion? Analysis of a nationwide prospective patient-reported outcomes registry","volume":"17","author":"McGirt MJ","year":"2017","unstructured":"McGirt MJ, Parker SL, Mummaneni P,  Is the use of minimally invasive fusion technologies associated with improved outcomes after elective interbody lumbar fusion? Analysis of a nationwide prospective patient-reported outcomes registry. Spine J. 2017;17(7):922\u2013932."},{"issue":"2","key":"b26","series-title":"J Neurosurg Spine","first-page":"182","article-title":"Leveraging machine learning to ascertain the implications of preoperative body mass index on surgical outcomes for 282 patients with preoperative obesity and lumbar spondylolisthesis in the Quality Outcomes Database","volume":"38","author":"Agarwal N","year":"2023","unstructured":"Agarwal N, Aabedi AA, Chan AK,  Leveraging machine learning to ascertain the implications of preoperative body mass index on surgical outcomes for 282 patients with preoperative obesity and lumbar spondylolisthesis in the Quality Outcomes Database. J Neurosurg Spine. 2023;38(2):182\u2013191."},{"issue":"1","key":"b27","series-title":"Neurosurg Focus","first-page":"E3","article-title":"Women fare best following surgery for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a comparison of the most and least satisfied patients utilizing data from the Quality Outcomes Database","volume":"44","author":"Chan AK","year":"2018","unstructured":"Chan AK, Bisson EF, Bydon M,  Women fare best following surgery for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a comparison of the most and least satisfied patients utilizing data from the Quality Outcomes Database. Neurosurg Focus. 2018;44(1):E3."},{"issue":"3","key":"b28","series-title":"J Neurosurg Spine","first-page":"349","article-title":"Open versus minimally invasive decompression for low-grade spondylolisthesis: analysis from the Quality Outcomes Database","volume":"33","author":"Bisson EF","year":"2020","unstructured":"Bisson EF, Mummaneni PV, Virk MS,  Open versus minimally invasive decompression for low-grade spondylolisthesis: analysis from the Quality Outcomes Database. J Neurosurg Spine. 2020;33(3):349\u2013359."},{"issue":"5","key":"b29","series-title":"Neurosurgery","first-page":"1037","article-title":"Impact of dominant symptom on 12-month patient-reported outcomes for patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery","volume":"87","author":"Devin CJ","year":"2020","unstructured":"Devin CJ, Asher AL, Archer KR,  Impact of dominant symptom on 12-month patient-reported outcomes for patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery. Neurosurgery. 2020;87(5):1037\u20131045."},{"issue":"4","key":"b30","series-title":"J Neurosurg Spine","first-page":"523","article-title":"Predictors of nonroutine discharge among patients undergoing surgery for grade I spondylolisthesis: insights from the Quality Outcomes Database","volume":"32","author":"Mummaneni PV","year":"2020","unstructured":"Mummaneni PV, Bydon M, Knightly J,  Predictors of nonroutine discharge among patients undergoing surgery for grade I spondylolisthesis: insights from the Quality Outcomes Database. J Neurosurg Spine. 2020;32(4):523\u2013532."},{"issue":"5","key":"b31","series-title":"Ann Med","first-page":"337","article-title":"EQ-5D: a measure of health status from the EuroQol Group","volume":"33","author":"Rabin R","year":"2001","unstructured":"Rabin R, de Charro F. EQ-5D: a measure of health status from the EuroQol Group. Ann Med. 2001;33(5):337\u2013343."},{"issue":"6","key":"b32","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","first-page":"741","article-title":"The North American spine society lumbar spine outcome assessment Instrument: reliability and validity tests","volume":"21","author":"Daltroy LH","year":"1996","unstructured":"Daltroy LH, Cats-Baril WL, Katz JN, Fossel AH, Liang MH. The North American spine society lumbar spine outcome assessment Instrument: reliability and validity tests. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996;21(6):741\u2013749."},{"issue":"1","key":"b33","series-title":"Neurosurg Focus","first-page":"E2","article-title":"Defining the minimum clinically important difference for grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: insights from the Quality Outcomes Database","volume":"44","author":"Asher AL","year":"2018","unstructured":"Asher AL, Kerezoudis P, Mummaneni PV,  Defining the minimum clinically important difference for grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: insights from the Quality Outcomes Database. Neurosurg Focus. 2018;44(1):E2."},{"issue":"26","key":"b34","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","first-page":"2287","article-title":"Reoperation and revision rates of 3 surgical treatment methods for lumbar stenosis associated with degenerative scoliosis and spondylolisthesis","volume":"38","author":"Brodke DS","year":"2013","unstructured":"Brodke DS, Annis P, Lawrence BD, Woodbury AM, Daubs MD. Reoperation and revision rates of 3 surgical treatment methods for lumbar stenosis associated with degenerative scoliosis and spondylolisthesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013;38(26):2287\u20132294."},{"issue":"20","key":"b35","series-title":"JAMA","first-page":"2441","article-title":"Surgical vs nonoperative treatment for lumbar disk herniation: the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT): a randomized trial","volume":"296","author":"Weinstein JN","year":"2006","unstructured":"Weinstein JN, Tosteson TD, Lurie JD,  Surgical vs nonoperative treatment for lumbar disk herniation: the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT): a randomized trial. JAMA. 2006;296(20):2441\u20132450."},{"issue":"6","key":"b36","series-title":"Neurosurg Focus","first-page":"E3","article-title":"Cost-effectiveness of lumbar discectomy and single-level fusion for spondylolisthesis: experience with the NeuroPoint-SD registry","volume":"36","author":"Mummaneni PV","year":"2014","unstructured":"Mummaneni PV, Whitmore RG, Curran JN,  Cost-effectiveness of lumbar discectomy and single-level fusion for spondylolisthesis: experience with the NeuroPoint-SD registry. Neurosurg Focus. 2014;36(6):E3."},{"issue":"3","key":"b37","series-title":"Neurosurgery","first-page":"355","article-title":"Lumbar spinal stenosis associated with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of secondary fusion rates following open vs minimally invasive decompression","volume":"80","author":"Sch\u00f6ller K","year":"2017","unstructured":"Sch\u00f6ller K, Alimi M, Cong GT, Christos P, H\u00e4rtl R. Lumbar spinal stenosis associated with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of secondary fusion rates following open vs minimally invasive decompression. Neurosurgery. 2017;80(3):355\u2013367."},{"key":"b38","series-title":"Front Bioeng Biotechnol","first-page":"1400508","article-title":"Effect of two-level decompressive procedures on the biomechanics of the lumbo-sacral spine: an ex vivo study","volume":"12","author":"Montanari S","year":"2024","unstructured":"Montanari S, Serchi E, Conti A, Barbanti Br\u00f2dano G, Stagni R, Cristofolini L. Effect of two-level decompressive procedures on the biomechanics of the lumbo-sacral spine: an ex vivo study. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024;12:1400508."},{"key":"b39","series-title":"BMC Musculoskelet Disord","first-page":"84","article-title":"Biomechanical comparison of lumbar spine instability between laminectomy and bilateral laminotomy for spinal stenosis syndrome - an experimental study in porcine model","volume":"9","author":"Tai CL","year":"2008","unstructured":"Tai CL, Hsieh PH, Chen WP, Chen LH, Chen WJ, Lai PL. Biomechanical comparison of lumbar spine instability between laminectomy and bilateral laminotomy for spinal stenosis syndrome - an experimental study in porcine model. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2008;9:84."},{"issue":"19","key":"b40","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","first-page":"1789","article-title":"The effect of bilateral laminotomy versus laminectomy on the motion and stiffness of the human lumbar spine: a biomechanical comparison","volume":"35","author":"Lee MJ","year":"2010","unstructured":"Lee MJ, Bransford RJ, Bellabarba C,  The effect of bilateral laminotomy versus laminectomy on the motion and stiffness of the human lumbar spine: a biomechanical comparison. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010;35(19):1789\u20131793."},{"issue":"5","key":"b41","series-title":"J Neurosurg Spine","first-page":"658","article-title":"Predictors of patient satisfaction after surgery for grade 1 degenerative spondylolisthesis: a 5-year analysis of the Quality Outcomes Database","volume":"41","author":"Dru A","year":"2024","unstructured":"Dru A, Johnson SE, Linzey JR,  Predictors of patient satisfaction after surgery for grade 1 degenerative spondylolisthesis: a 5-year analysis of the Quality Outcomes Database. J Neurosurg Spine. 2024;41(5):658\u2013665."},{"key":"b42","series-title":"BMJ","first-page":"e079771","article-title":"Decompression alone or with fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (Nordsten-DS): five year follow-up of a randomised, multicentre, non-inferiority trial","volume":"386","author":"Kgomotso EL","year":"2024","unstructured":"Kgomotso EL, Hellum C, Fagerland MW,  Decompression alone or with fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (Nordsten-DS): five year follow-up of a randomised, multicentre, non-inferiority trial. BMJ. 2024;386:e079771."},{"issue":"6","key":"b43","series-title":"N Engl J Med","first-page":"526","article-title":"Decompression with or without fusion in degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis","volume":"385","author":"Austevoll IM","year":"2021","unstructured":"Austevoll IM, Hermansen E, Fagerland MW,  Decompression with or without fusion in degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. N Engl J Med. 2021;385(6):526\u2013538."},{"issue":"1","key":"b44","series-title":"J Neurosurg Spine","first-page":"80","article-title":"Predictors of indirect neural decompression in minimally invasive transpsoas lateral lumbar interbody fusion","volume":"35","author":"Walker CT","year":"2021","unstructured":"Walker CT, Xu DS, Cole TS,  Predictors of indirect neural decompression in minimally invasive transpsoas lateral lumbar interbody fusion. J Neurosurg Spine. 2021;35(1):80\u201390."},{"issue":"1","key":"b45","series-title":"Neurosurgery","first-page":"173","article-title":"Fulfillment of patient expectations after spine surgery is critical to patient satisfaction: a cohort study of spine surgery patients","volume":"91","author":"Rampersaud YR","year":"2022","unstructured":"Rampersaud YR, Canizares M, Perruccio AV,  Fulfillment of patient expectations after spine surgery is critical to patient satisfaction: a cohort study of spine surgery patients. Neurosurgery. 2022;91(1):173\u2013181."}],"container-title":["Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/thejns.org\/view\/journals\/j-neurosurg-spine\/43\/5\/article-p547.xml","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/thejns.org\/downloadpdf\/journals\/j-neurosurg-spine\/43\/5\/article-p547.xml","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"syndication"},{"URL":"https:\/\/thejns.org\/downloadpdf\/journals\/j-neurosurg-spine\/43\/5\/article-p547.xml","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,6]],"date-time":"2026-03-06T13:46:00Z","timestamp":1772804760000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/thejns.org\/view\/journals\/j-neurosurg-spine\/43\/5\/article-p547.xml"}},"subtitle":["Presented at the 2025 AANS\/CNS Joint Section on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves"],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,1]]},"references-count":90,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5"},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3171\/2025.5.spine25324","relation":{},"ISSN":["1547-5654"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1547-5654","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,1]]}}}