{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,11,6]],"date-time":"2026-11-06T15:26:43Z","timestamp":1793978803050,"version":"4.8.0"},"reference-count":36,"publisher":"Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG)","issue":"5","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,6]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>OBJECTIVE<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Limited research has explored the impact of predominant back pain (pBP) versus predominant leg pain (pLP) in patients undergoing unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar decompression (UBE-LD). This study aimed to evaluate and compare the perioperative and postoperative clinical outcomes, using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and minimal clinically important difference (MCID), between patients with pBP and pLP who underwent UBE-LD.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>METHODS<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Patients who underwent primary UBE-LD were divided into either the pBP or pLP cohort. Exclusion criteria included patients with a diagnosis of degenerative scoliosis, trauma, malignancy, or infection. Demographic, perioperative characteristics, PROMs, and MCID were compared between cohorts using inferential statistics. PROMs were collected at preoperative and postoperative 6-week, 12-week, and 6-month time points. Assessed PROMs included the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System\u2013Physical Function (PROMIS-PF), Veterans Rand 12-Item Health Survey (VR-12) physical component score (PCS), VR-12 mental component score (MCS), visual analog scale (VAS) for back pain, VAS for leg pain, and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). MCID attainment was determined by comparing the change in PROMs to established thresholds in the literature.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>RESULTS<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>A total of 98 patients were included in the study, with 52 in the pBP cohort and 46 in pLP cohort. After analysis, there were no significant differences in baseline demographic or perioperative characteristics between the two groups. The majority of patients had a diagnosis of herniated nucleus pulposus (81.6%), central stenosis (93.9%), and foraminal stenosis (77.6%). At 6 months, both cohorts experienced significant postoperative improvements in PROMIS-PF, VAS back pain, VAS leg pain, VR-12 PCS, and ODI scores (all p \u2264 0.011). VR-12 MCS scores did not demonstrate sustained postoperative improvement in either cohort. High rates of MCID achievement were observed across both cohorts for multiple PROMs, with no statistically significant differences in MCID attainment between patients with pBP and pLP at any postoperative time point.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>CONCLUSIONS<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Regardless of the preoperative predominant pain location, patients undergoing UBE-LD reported significant improvements in physical function, back and leg pain, and disability. Patients in both cohorts demonstrated improvements in mental health outcomes, with comparable MCID achievement rates for VR-12 MCS. These findings suggest that UBE-LD might be effective for patients with both predominant back and leg pain presentations, although differences in specific outcome domains should be interpreted with caution due to potential selection bias. Consideration of predominant pain location might help inform preoperative patient counseling regarding expected outcomes following UBE-LD.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.3171\/2025.9.spine241288","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,6]],"date-time":"2026-03-06T13:45:54Z","timestamp":1772804754000},"page":"713-721","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Influence of predominant back versus leg pain on clinical outcomes in unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar decompression"],"prefix":"10.3171","volume":"44","author":[{"given":"Luis M.","family":"Salazar","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Sloane O.","family":"Ward","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Shriya N.","family":"Patel","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Kern","family":"Singh","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1754","reference":[{"issue":"8","key":"b1","series-title":"N Engl J Med","first-page":"794","article-title":"Surgical versus nonsurgical therapy for lumbar spinal stenosis","volume":"358","author":"Weinstein JN","year":"2008","unstructured":"Weinstein JN, Tosteson TD, Lurie JD,  Surgical versus nonsurgical therapy for lumbar spinal stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(8):794\u2013810."},{"issue":"4","key":"b2","series-title":"J Neurosurg Spine","first-page":"602","article-title":"Percutaneous biportal endoscopic decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: a technical note and preliminary clinical results","volume":"24","author":"Hwa Eum J","year":"2016","unstructured":"Hwa Eum J, Hwa Heo D, Son SK, Park CK. Percutaneous biportal endoscopic decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: a technical note and preliminary clinical results. J Neurosurg Spine. 2016;24(4):602\u2013607."},{"issue":"5","key":"b3","series-title":"Eur Spine J","first-page":"1037","article-title":"Irrigation endoscopic discectomy: a novel percutaneous approach for lumbar disc prolapse","volume":"22","author":"Soliman HM","year":"2013","unstructured":"Soliman HM. Irrigation endoscopic discectomy: a novel percutaneous approach for lumbar disc prolapse. Eur Spine J. 2013;22(5):1037\u20131044."},{"issue":"10","key":"b4","series-title":"Spine J","first-page":"2282","article-title":"Irrigation endoscopic decompressive laminotomy. A new endoscopic approach for spinal stenosis decompression","volume":"15","author":"Soliman HM","year":"2015","unstructured":"Soliman HM. Irrigation endoscopic decompressive laminotomy. A new endoscopic approach for spinal stenosis decompression. Spine J. 2015;15(10):2282\u20132289."},{"issue":"suppl 3","key":"b5","series-title":"Int J Spine Surg","first-page":"S65","article-title":"A review of unilateral biportal endoscopic decompression for degenerative lumbar canal stenosis","volume":"15","author":"Pao JL","year":"2021","unstructured":"Pao JL. A review of unilateral biportal endoscopic decompression for degenerative lumbar canal stenosis. Int J Spine Surg. 2021;15(suppl 3):S65-S71."},{"issue":"1","key":"b6","series-title":"Neurospine","first-page":"138","article-title":"Biportal endoscopic spinal surgery for bilateral lumbar foraminal decompression by switching surgeon\u2019s position and primary 2 portals: a report of 2 cases with technical note","volume":"16","author":"Song KS","year":"2019","unstructured":"Song KS, Lee CW, Moon JG. Biportal endoscopic spinal surgery for bilateral lumbar foraminal decompression by switching surgeon\u2019s position and primary 2 portals: a report of 2 cases with technical note. Neurospine. 2019;16(1):138\u2013147."},{"issue":"2","key":"b7","series-title":"Clin Orthop Surg","first-page":"248","article-title":"Biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with arthroscopy","volume":"10","author":"Kim JE","year":"2018","unstructured":"Kim JE, Choi DJ. Biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with arthroscopy. Clin Orthop Surg. 2018;10(2):248\u2013252."},{"issue":"3","key":"b8","series-title":"Clin Orthop Surg","first-page":"330","article-title":"Advantages of new endoscopic unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression (ULBD) over conventional microscopic ULBD","volume":"12","author":"Kim HS","year":"2020","unstructured":"Kim HS, Choi SH, Shim DM, Lee IS, Oh YK, Woo YH. Advantages of new endoscopic unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression (ULBD) over conventional microscopic ULBD. Clin Orthop Surg. 2020;12(3):330\u2013336."},{"issue":"3","key":"b9","series-title":"J Orthop Sci","first-page":"371","article-title":"Clinical and radiological outcomes between biportal endoscopic decompression and microscopic decompression in lumbar spinal stenosis","volume":"25","author":"Min WK","year":"2020","unstructured":"Min WK, Kim JE, Choi DJ, Park EJ, Heo J. Clinical and radiological outcomes between biportal endoscopic decompression and microscopic decompression in lumbar spinal stenosis. J Orthop Sci. 2020;25(3):371\u2013378."},{"issue":"11","key":"b10","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","first-page":"1198","article-title":"The influence of preoperative back pain on the outcome of lumbar decompression surgery","volume":"34","author":"Kleinst\u00fcck FS","year":"2009","unstructured":"Kleinst\u00fcck FS, Grob D, Lattig F,  The influence of preoperative back pain on the outcome of lumbar decompression surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009;34(11):1198\u20131203."},{"issue":"8","key":"b11","series-title":"Global Spine J","first-page":"1667","article-title":"Back dominant pain has equal outcomes to radicular dominant pain following posterior lumbar fusion in adult isthmic spondylolisthesis: a CSORN study","volume":"12","author":"Alnaghmoosh N","year":"2022","unstructured":"Alnaghmoosh N, Urquhart J, Raj R,  Back dominant pain has equal outcomes to radicular dominant pain following posterior lumbar fusion in adult isthmic spondylolisthesis: a CSORN study. Global Spine J. 2022;12(8):1667\u20131675."},{"issue":"22","key":"b12","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","first-page":"2602","article-title":"Patient satisfaction as an outcome measure after surgical treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis: testing the validity and discriminative ability in terms of symptoms and functional status","volume":"31","author":"Yamashita K","year":"2006","unstructured":"Yamashita K, Ohzono K, Hiroshima K. Patient satisfaction as an outcome measure after surgical treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis: testing the validity and discriminative ability in terms of symptoms and functional status. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006;31(22):2602\u20132608."},{"issue":"3","key":"b13","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","first-page":"219","article-title":"Predominant leg pain is associated with better surgical outcomes in degenerative spondylolisthesis and spinal stenosis: results from the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT)","volume":"36","author":"Pearson A","year":"2011","unstructured":"Pearson A, Blood E, Lurie J,  Predominant leg pain is associated with better surgical outcomes in degenerative spondylolisthesis and spinal stenosis: results from the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT). Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011;36(3):219\u2013229."},{"issue":"11","key":"b14","series-title":"Spine J","first-page":"1778","article-title":"Current treatment and decision-making factors leading to fusion vs decompression for one-level degenerative spondylolisthesis: survey results from members of the Lumbar Spine Research Society and Society of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery","volume":"22","author":"Morse KW","year":"2022","unstructured":"Morse KW, Steinhaus M, Bovonratwet P,  Current treatment and decision-making factors leading to fusion vs decompression for one-level degenerative spondylolisthesis: survey results from members of the Lumbar Spine Research Society and Society of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery. Spine J. 2022;22(11):1778\u20131787."},{"issue":"21","key":"b15","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","first-page":"E1161","article-title":"Rationale for the surgical treatment of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis","volume":"40","author":"Schroeder GD","year":"2015","unstructured":"Schroeder GD, Kepler CK, Kurd MF,  Rationale for the surgical treatment of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015;40(21):E1161\u2013E1166."},{"issue":"5","key":"b16","series-title":"Spine J","first-page":"821","article-title":"Lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis: factors associated with the decision to fuse","volume":"21","author":"Schneider N","year":"2021","unstructured":"Schneider N, Fisher C, Glennie A,  Lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis: factors associated with the decision to fuse. Spine J. 2021;21(5):821\u2013828."},{"issue":"5","key":"b17","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","first-page":"556","article-title":"Surgical and nonsurgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis: four-year outcomes from the Maine Lumbar Spine Study","volume":"25","author":"Atlas SJ","year":"2000","unstructured":"Atlas SJ, Keller RB, Robson D, Deyo RA, Singer DE. Surgical and nonsurgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis: four-year outcomes from the Maine Lumbar Spine Study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25(5):556\u2013562."},{"issue":"4","key":"b18","series-title":"J Neurosurg Spine","first-page":"576","article-title":"Improvement in predominant back pain following minimally invasive decompression for spinal stenosis","volume":"39","author":"Korsun MK","year":"2023","unstructured":"Korsun MK, Shahi P, Shinn DJ,  Improvement in predominant back pain following minimally invasive decompression for spinal stenosis. J Neurosurg Spine. 2023;39(4):576\u2013582."},{"key":"b19","series-title":"BMJ","first-page":"h1603","article-title":"Minimally invasive decompression versus open laminectomy for central stenosis of the lumbar spine: pragmatic comparative effectiveness study","volume":"350","author":"Nerland US","year":"2015","unstructured":"Nerland US, Jakola AS, Solheim O,  Minimally invasive decompression versus open laminectomy for central stenosis of the lumbar spine: pragmatic comparative effectiveness study. BMJ. 2015;350:h1603."},{"issue":"1","key":"b20","series-title":"HSS J","first-page":"62","article-title":"Improvements in back and leg pain after minimally invasive lumbar decompression","volume":"16","author":"Massel DH","year":"2020","unstructured":"Massel DH, Mayo BC, Patel DV,  Improvements in back and leg pain after minimally invasive lumbar decompression. HSS J. 2020;16(1):62\u201371."},{"issue":"2","key":"b21","series-title":"Br J Neurosurg","first-page":"161","article-title":"Bilateral laminotomy through a unilateral approach (minimally invasive) versus open laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis","volume":"35","author":"Horan J","year":"2021","unstructured":"Horan J, Husien MB, Bolger C. Bilateral laminotomy through a unilateral approach (minimally invasive) versus open laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis. Br J Neurosurg. 2021;35(2):161\u2013165."},{"key":"b22","series-title":"World Neurosurg","first-page":"458","article-title":"Short- and long-term outcome of microscopic lumbar spine surgery in patients with predominant back or predominant leg pain","volume":"93","author":"Stienen MN","year":"2016","unstructured":"Stienen MN, Joswig H, Smoll NR,  Short- and long-term outcome of microscopic lumbar spine surgery in patients with predominant back or predominant leg pain. World Neurosurg. 2016;93:458\u2013465.e1."},{"issue":"5","key":"b23","series-title":"Acta Orthop","first-page":"536","article-title":"Prognostic factors in lumbar spinal stenosis surgery","volume":"83","author":"Sigmundsson FG","year":"2012","unstructured":"Sigmundsson FG, Kang XP, J\u00f6nsson B, Str\u00f6mqvist B. Prognostic factors in lumbar spinal stenosis surgery. Acta Orthop. 2012;83(5):536\u2013542."},{"issue":"2","key":"b24","series-title":"J Spine Surg","first-page":"438","article-title":"Unilateral biportal endoscopic decompression for degenerative lumbar canal stenosis","volume":"6","author":"Pao JL","year":"2020","unstructured":"Pao JL, Lin SM, Chen WC, Chang CH. Unilateral biportal endoscopic decompression for degenerative lumbar canal stenosis. J Spine Surg. 2020;6(2):438\u2013446."},{"issue":"6","key":"b25","series-title":"Spine J","first-page":"968","article-title":"Minimum clinically important difference in lumbar spine surgery patients: a choice of methods using the Oswestry Disability Index, Medical Outcomes Study questionnaire Short Form 36, and pain scales","volume":"8","author":"Copay AG","year":"2008","unstructured":"Copay AG, Glassman SD, Subach BR, Berven S, Schuler TC, Carreon LY. Minimum clinically important difference in lumbar spine surgery patients: a choice of methods using the Oswestry Disability Index, Medical Outcomes Study questionnaire Short Form 36, and pain scales. Spine J. 2008;8(6):968\u2013974."},{"issue":"1","key":"b26","series-title":"Neurospine","first-page":"361","article-title":"Prognostic value in preoperative Veterans RAND-12 Mental Component Score on clinical outcomes for patients undergoing minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion","volume":"21","author":"Khosla I","year":"2024","unstructured":"Khosla I, Anwar FN, Roca AM,  Prognostic value in preoperative Veterans RAND-12 Mental Component Score on clinical outcomes for patients undergoing minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion. Neurospine. 2024;21(1):361\u2013371."},{"issue":"5","key":"b27","series-title":"J Neurosurg Spine","first-page":"598","article-title":"Utility of minimum clinically important difference in assessing pain, disability, and health state after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis","volume":"14","author":"Parker SL","year":"2011","unstructured":"Parker SL, Adogwa O, Paul AR,  Utility of minimum clinically important difference in assessing pain, disability, and health state after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. J Neurosurg Spine. 2011;14(5):598\u2013604."},{"issue":"2","key":"b28","series-title":"J Med Econ","first-page":"245","article-title":"The burden of chronic low back pain with and without a neuropathic component: a healthcare resource use and cost analysis","volume":"15","author":"Mehra M","year":"2012","unstructured":"Mehra M, Hill K, Nicholl D, Schadrack J. The burden of chronic low back pain with and without a neuropathic component: a healthcare resource use and cost analysis. J Med Econ. 2012;15(2):245\u2013252."},{"issue":"1","key":"b29","series-title":"Malays Orthop J","first-page":"61","article-title":"Spinal fusion for chronic low back pain: a \"magic bullet\" or wishful thinking?","volume":"10","author":"Dhillon KS","year":"2016","unstructured":"Dhillon KS. Spinal fusion for chronic low back pain: a \"magic bullet\" or wishful thinking? Malays Orthop J. 2016;10(1):61\u201368."},{"issue":"1","key":"b30","series-title":"J Spine Surg","first-page":"2","article-title":"Lumbar interbody fusion: techniques, indications and comparison of interbody fusion options including PLIF, TLIF, MI-TLIF, OLIF\/ATP, LLIF and ALIF","volume":"1","author":"Mobbs RJ","year":"2015","unstructured":"Mobbs RJ, Phan K, Malham G, Seex K, Rao PJ. Lumbar interbody fusion: techniques, indications and comparison of interbody fusion options including PLIF, TLIF, MI-TLIF, OLIF\/ATP, LLIF and ALIF. J Spine Surg. 2015;1(1):2\u201318."},{"issue":"1","key":"b31","series-title":"Rheumatology (Oxford)","first-page":"5","article-title":"The cellular pathobiology of the degenerate intervertebral disc and discogenic back pain","volume":"48","author":"Freemont AJ","year":"2009","unstructured":"Freemont AJ. The cellular pathobiology of the degenerate intervertebral disc and discogenic back pain. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2009;48(1):5\u201310."},{"issue":"1","key":"b32","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","first-page":"66","article-title":"Psychiatric illness and chronic low-back pain. The mind and the spine\u2014which goes first?","volume":"18","author":"Polatin PB","year":"1993","unstructured":"Polatin PB, Kinney RK, Gatchel RJ, Lillo E, Mayer TG. Psychiatric illness and chronic low-back pain. The mind and the spine\u2014which goes first? Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1993;18(1):66\u201371."},{"issue":"17","key":"b33","series-title":"Int J Environ Res Public Health","first-page":"10657","article-title":"Quality of life and mental distress in patients with chronic low back pain: a cross-sectional study","volume":"19","author":"Hnate\u0161en D","year":"2022","unstructured":"Hnate\u0161en D, Pavi\u0107 R, Rado\u0161 I,  Quality of life and mental distress in patients with chronic low back pain: a cross-sectional study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(17):10657."},{"key":"b34","series-title":"Int J Spine Surg","first-page":"e29","article-title":"Backing up the stories: the psychological and social costs of chronic low-back pain","volume":"7","author":"Mathew J","year":"2013","unstructured":"Mathew J, Singh SB, Garis S, Diwan AD. Backing up the stories: the psychological and social costs of chronic low-back pain. Int J Spine Surg. 2013;7:e29\u2013e38."},{"issue":"4","key":"b35","series-title":"Int J Spine Surg","first-page":"780","article-title":"Do patients with back pain-dominant symptoms improve after lumbar surgery for radiculopathy or claudication?","volume":"15","author":"Divi SN","year":"2021","unstructured":"Divi SN, Woods BI, Goyal DKC,  Do patients with back pain-dominant symptoms improve after lumbar surgery for radiculopathy or claudication? Int J Spine Surg. 2021;15(4):780\u2013787."},{"issue":"6","key":"b36","series-title":"Spine J","first-page":"447","article-title":"The reliability of determining \"leg dominant pain.\"","volume":"9","author":"Wai EK","year":"2009","unstructured":"Wai EK, Howse K, Pollock JW, Dornan H, Vexler L, Dagenais S. The reliability of determining \"leg dominant pain.\". Spine J. 2009;9(6):447\u2013453."}],"container-title":["Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/thejns.org\/view\/journals\/j-neurosurg-spine\/44\/5\/article-p713.xml","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/thejns.org\/downloadpdf\/journals\/j-neurosurg-spine\/44\/5\/article-p713.xml","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"syndication"},{"URL":"https:\/\/thejns.org\/downloadpdf\/journals\/j-neurosurg-spine\/44\/5\/article-p713.xml","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,11,6]],"date-time":"2026-11-06T14:49:31Z","timestamp":1793976571000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/thejns.org\/view\/journals\/j-neurosurg-spine\/44\/5\/article-p713.xml"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,6]]},"references-count":36,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5"},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3171\/2025.9.spine241288","relation":{},"ISSN":["1547-5654"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1547-5654","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,6]]}}}