{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,8]],"date-time":"2026-07-08T00:20:21Z","timestamp":1783470021757,"version":"3.55.0"},"reference-count":82,"publisher":"Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG)","issue":"1","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,1]]},"abstract":"\n OBJECTIVE<\/jats:title>\n The aim of this study was to determine if there is a difference in reoperations for adjacent segment disease (ASD) and all-cause reoperations between 1-level and contiguous 2-level cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA).<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n METHODS<\/jats:title>\n A retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients (18\u201360 years of age) with cervical degenerative disc disease who underwent a primary 1-level or 2-level CDA using data from a national spine registry. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to evaluate reoperations for all-cause risks. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals are presented; a p value < 0.05 was the significance threshold.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n RESULTS<\/jats:title>\n The cohort consisted of 650 patients with 1-level CDA and 159 patients with 2-level CDA. The mean overall observational follow-up was 6.2 years (SD 4.3 years) for 1-level CDA and 4.2 years (SD 3.1 years) for 2-level CDA. The 5-year incidence of ASD reoperations was higher in 1-level CDA (4.7%, 95% CI 2.8%\u20136.6%) compared to 2-level CDA (1.1%, 95% CI 0.0%\u20133.15%). In Cox regression analysis, there was no statistical difference in all-cause reoperations between 1-level CDA and 2-level CDA (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.44\u20131.94; p = 0.84). Few events in 2-level ASD reoperations allowed determination of hazard ratio.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n CONCLUSIONS<\/jats:title>\n This study is the first large real-world analysis outside of investigational device exemption trials to show no significant difference in all-cause reoperation rates between 1-level and 2-level CDA. Notably, the 5-year incidence of ASD-related reoperations was substantially higher following 1-level CDA compared with 2-level CDA. The reason for this discrepancy remains unclear. One possibility is surgeon selection bias\u2014where an adjacent degenerative level may be left untreated during a 1-level CDA under the assumption that motion preservation would protect against adjacent segment deterioration. Alternatively, the higher ASD rate may simply reflect the natural history of cervical spondylosis rather than device effect. Further investigation is needed to determine the true drivers of this observation.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.3171\/2026.3.focus251150","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,24]],"date-time":"2026-06-24T00:01:06Z","timestamp":1782259266000},"page":"E3","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Reoperation risks between 1-level and 2-level cervical disc arthroplasty: analysis of a cohort of patients from a national spine registry"],"prefix":"10.3171","volume":"61","author":[{"given":"David J.","family":"Moller","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Neurosurgery, The Permanente Medical Group, Sacramento;"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Richard N.","family":"Chang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Medical Device Surveillance & Assessment, Kaiser Permanente, San Diego;"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Haiden M.","family":"Guppy","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Stanford University, Stanford, California;"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ellie","family":"Moller","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Southern Adventist University, Collegedale, Tennessee; and"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Heather A.","family":"Prentice","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Medical Device Surveillance & Assessment, Kaiser Permanente, San Diego;"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jessica E.","family":"Harris","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Medical Device Surveillance & Assessment, Kaiser Permanente, San Diego;"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Shayan","family":"Rahman","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Neurosurgery, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Los Angeles, California"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Harsimran S.","family":"Brara","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Neurosurgery, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Los Angeles, California"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1754","reference":[{"issue":"4","key":"b1","series-title":"J Neurosurg Spine","first-page":"348","article-title":"Prospective, randomized, multicenter study of cervical arthroplasty: 269 patients from the Kineflex|C artificial disc investigational device exemption study with a minimum 2-year follow-up: clinical article","volume":"15","author":"Coric D","year":"2011","unstructured":"Coric D, Nunley PD, Guyer RD, Prospective, randomized, multicenter study of cervical arthroplasty: 269 patients from the Kineflex|C artificial disc investigational device exemption study with a minimum 2-year follow-up: clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine. 2011;15(4):348\u2013358. doi:10.3171\/2011.5.SPINE10769"},{"issue":"2","key":"b2","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","first-page":"101","article-title":"Comparison of BRYAN cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical decompression and fusion: clinical and radiographic results of a randomized, controlled, clinical trial","volume":"34","author":"Heller JG","year":"2009","unstructured":"Heller JG, Sasso RC, Papadopoulos SM, Comparison of BRYAN cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical decompression and fusion: clinical and radiographic results of a randomized, controlled, clinical trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009;34(2):101\u2013107. doi:10.1097\/BRS.0b013e31818ee263"},{"key":"b3","series-title":"Int J Spine Surg","first-page":"7","article-title":"Multi-center, prospective, randomized, controlled investigational device exemption clinical trial comparing Mobi-C Cervical Artificial Disc to anterior discectomy and fusion in the treatment of symptomatic degenerative disc disease in the cervical spine","volume":"8","author":"Hisey MS","year":"2014","unstructured":"Hisey MS, Bae HW, Davis R, Multi-center, prospective, randomized, controlled investigational device exemption clinical trial comparing Mobi-C Cervical Artificial Disc to anterior discectomy and fusion in the treatment of symptomatic degenerative disc disease in the cervical spine. Int J Spine Surg. 2014;8:7. doi:10.14444\/1007"},{"issue":"4","key":"b4","series-title":"J Spinal Disord Tech","first-page":"E237","article-title":"Prospective, randomized comparison of cervical total disk replacement versus anterior cervical fusion: results at 48 months follow-up","volume":"28","author":"Hisey MS","year":"2015","unstructured":"Hisey MS, Bae HW, Davis RJ, Prospective, randomized comparison of cervical total disk replacement versus anterior cervical fusion: results at 48 months follow-up. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2015;28(4):E237\u2013E243. doi:10.1097\/BSD.0000000000000185"},{"issue":"3","key":"b5","series-title":"J Neurosurg Spine","first-page":"198","article-title":"Clinical and radiographic analysis of cervical disc arthroplasty compared with allograft fusion: a randomized controlled clinical trial","volume":"6","author":"Mummaneni PV","year":"2007","unstructured":"Mummaneni PV, Burkus JK, Haid RW, Traynelis VC, Zdeblick TA. Clinical and radiographic analysis of cervical disc arthroplasty compared with allograft fusion: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Neurosurg Spine. 2007;6(3):198\u2013209. doi:10.3171\/spi.2007.6.3.198"},{"issue":"4","key":"b6","series-title":"Spine J","first-page":"275","article-title":"Results of the prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-C total disc replacement versus anterior discectomy and fusion for the treatment of 1-level symptomatic cervical disc disease","volume":"9","author":"Murrey D","year":"2009","unstructured":"Murrey D, Janssen M, Delamarter R, Results of the prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-C total disc replacement versus anterior discectomy and fusion for the treatment of 1-level symptomatic cervical disc disease. Spine J. 2009;9(4):275\u2013286. doi:10.1016\/j.spinee.2008.05.006"},{"issue":"15","key":"b7","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","first-page":"E907","article-title":"A prospective, randomized, controlled clinical investigation comparing PCM cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. 2-year results from the US FDA IDE clinical trial","volume":"38","author":"Phillips FM","year":"2013","unstructured":"Phillips FM, Lee JYB, Geisler FH, A prospective, randomized, controlled clinical investigation comparing PCM cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. 2-year results from the US FDA IDE clinical trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013;38(15):E907\u2013E918. doi:10.1097\/BRS.0b013e318296232f"},{"issue":"5","key":"b8","series-title":"Clin Spine Surg","first-page":"E515","article-title":"Cervical disk replacement with Discover versus fusion in a single-level cervical disk disease: a prospective single-center randomized trial with a minimum 2-year follow-up","volume":"30","author":"Ro\u017eankovi\u0107 M","year":"2017","unstructured":"Ro\u017eankovi\u0107 M, Marasanov SM, Vuki\u0107 M. Cervical disk replacement with Discover versus fusion in a single-level cervical disk disease: a prospective single-center randomized trial with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Clin Spine Surg. 2017;30(5):E515\u2013E522. doi:10.1097\/BSD.0000000000000170"},{"issue":"11","key":"b9","series-title":"Orthopedics","first-page":"889","article-title":"Results of cervical arthroplasty compared with anterior discectomy and fusion: four-year clinical outcomes in a prospective, randomized controlled trial","volume":"34","author":"Sasso RC","year":"2011","unstructured":"Sasso RC, Anderson PA, Riew KD, Heller JG. Results of cervical arthroplasty compared with anterior discectomy and fusion: four-year clinical outcomes in a prospective, randomized controlled trial. Orthopedics. 2011;34(11):889. doi:10.3928\/01477447-20110922-24"},{"issue":"6","key":"b10","series-title":"Spine J","first-page":"1284","article-title":"The Discover artificial disc replacement versus fusion in cervical radiculopathy\u2014a randomized controlled outcome trial with 2-year follow-up","volume":"15","author":"Skeppholm M","year":"2015","unstructured":"Skeppholm M, Lindgren L, Henriques T, Vavruch L, L\u00f6fgren H, Olerud C. The Discover artificial disc replacement versus fusion in cervical radiculopathy\u2014a randomized controlled outcome trial with 2-year follow-up. Spine J. 2015;15(6):1284\u20131294. doi:10.1016\/j.spinee.2015.02.039"},{"issue":"26","key":"b11","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","first-page":"2227","article-title":"Clinical outcomes with selectively constrained SECURE-C cervical disc arthroplasty: two-year results from a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter investigational device exemption study","volume":"38","author":"Vaccaro A","year":"2013","unstructured":"Vaccaro A, Beutler W, Peppelman W, Clinical outcomes with selectively constrained SECURE-C cervical disc arthroplasty: two-year results from a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter investigational device exemption study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013;38(26):2227\u20132239. doi:10.1097\/BRS.0000000000000031"},{"issue":"12","key":"b12","series-title":"Int Orthop","first-page":"2533","article-title":"A prospective, randomised, controlled multicentre study comparing cervical disc replacement with anterior cervical decompression and fusion","volume":"38","author":"Zhang HX","year":"2014","unstructured":"Zhang HX, Shao YD, Chen Y, A prospective, randomised, controlled multicentre study comparing cervical disc replacement with anterior cervical decompression and fusion. Int Orthop. 2014;38(12):2533\u20132541. doi:10.1007\/s00264-014-2497-5"},{"issue":"3","key":"b13","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","first-page":"203","article-title":"ProDisc-C and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion as surgical treatment for single-level cervical symptomatic degenerative disc disease: five-year results of a Food and Drug Administration study","volume":"38","author":"Zigler JE","year":"2013","unstructured":"Zigler JE, Delamarter R, Murrey D, Spivak J, Janssen M. ProDisc-C and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion as surgical treatment for single-level cervical symptomatic degenerative disc disease: five-year results of a Food and Drug Administration study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013;38(3):203\u2013209. doi:10.1097\/BRS.0b013e318278eb38"},{"issue":"5","key":"b14","series-title":"J Neurosurg Spine","first-page":"532","article-title":"Cervical total disc replacement with the Mobi-C cervical artificial disc compared with anterior discectomy and fusion for treatment of 2-level symptomatic degenerative disc disease: a prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter clinical trial: clinical article","volume":"19","author":"Davis RJ","year":"2013","unstructured":"Davis RJ, Kim KD, Hisey MS, Cervical total disc replacement with the Mobi-C cervical artificial disc compared with anterior discectomy and fusion for treatment of 2-level symptomatic degenerative disc disease: a prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter clinical trial: clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine. 2013;19(5):532\u2013545. doi:10.3171\/2013.6.SPINE12527"},{"issue":"3","key":"b15","series-title":"J Neurosurg Spine","first-page":"252","article-title":"Prospective, randomized multicenter study of cervical arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: 5-year results with a metal-on-metal artificial disc","volume":"28","author":"Coric D","year":"2018","unstructured":"Coric D, Guyer RD, Nunley PD, Prospective, randomized multicenter study of cervical arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: 5-year results with a metal-on-metal artificial disc. J Neurosurg Spine. 2018;28(3):252\u2013261. doi:10.3171\/2017.5.SPINE16824"},{"issue":"4","key":"b16","series-title":"J Neurosurg Spine","first-page":"508","article-title":"Two-level cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: 10-year outcomes of a prospective, randomized investigational device exemption clinical trial","volume":"31","author":"Gornet MF","year":"2019","unstructured":"Gornet MF, Lanman TH, Burkus JK, Two-level cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: 10-year outcomes of a prospective, randomized investigational device exemption clinical trial. J Neurosurg Spine. 2019;31(4):508\u2013518. doi:10.3171\/2019.4.SPINE19157"},{"issue":"3","key":"b17","series-title":"Neurosurgery","first-page":"497","article-title":"Ten-year outcomes of 1- and 2-level cervical disc arthroplasty from the Mobi-C investigational device exemption clinical trial","volume":"88","author":"Kim K","year":"2021","unstructured":"Kim K, Hoffman G, Bae H, Ten-year outcomes of 1- and 2-level cervical disc arthroplasty from the Mobi-C investigational device exemption clinical trial. Neurosurgery. 2021;88(3):497\u2013505. doi:10.1093\/neuros\/nyaa459"},{"issue":"4","key":"b18","series-title":"Int J Spine Surg","first-page":"31","article-title":"Long-term evaluation of cervical disc arthroplasty with the Mobi-C\u00a9 cervical disc: a randomized, prospective, multicenter clinical trial with seven-year follow-up","volume":"11","author":"Radcliff K","year":"2017","unstructured":"Radcliff K, Davis RJ, Hisey MS, Long-term evaluation of cervical disc arthroplasty with the Mobi-C\u00a9 cervical disc: a randomized, prospective, multicenter clinical trial with seven-year follow-up. Int J Spine Surg. 2017;11(4):31. doi:10.14444\/4031"},{"issue":"1","key":"b19","series-title":"J Neurosurg Spine","first-page":"33","article-title":"Changes in adjacent-level disc pressure and facet joint force after cervical arthroplasty compared with cervical discectomy and fusion","volume":"7","author":"Chang UK","year":"2007","unstructured":"Chang UK, Kim DH, Lee MC, Willenberg R, Kim SH, Lim J. Changes in adjacent-level disc pressure and facet joint force after cervical arthroplasty compared with cervical discectomy and fusion. J Neurosurg Spine. 2007;7(1):33\u201339. doi:10.3171\/SPI-07\/07\/033"},{"issue":"6 suppl","key":"b20","series-title":"Spine J","first-page":"190S","article-title":"Adjacent segment degeneration and adjacent segment disease: the consequences of spinal fusion","volume":"4","author":"Hilibrand AS","year":"2004","unstructured":"Hilibrand AS, Robbins M. Adjacent segment degeneration and adjacent segment disease: the consequences of spinal fusion? Spine J. 2004;4(6 suppl):190S-194S. doi:10.1016\/j.spinee.2004.07.007"},{"issue":"24","key":"b21","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","first-page":"2788","article-title":"Does anterior plating of the cervical spine predispose to adjacent segment changes?","volume":"30","author":"Rao RD","year":"2005","unstructured":"Rao RD, Wang M, McGrady LM, Perlewitz TJ, David KS. Does anterior plating of the cervical spine predispose to adjacent segment changes? Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005;30(24):2788\u20132792. doi:10.1097\/01.brs.0000190453.46472.08"},{"issue":"11","key":"b22","series-title":"Kaohsiung J Med Sci","first-page":"586","article-title":"Loading effects of anterior cervical spine fusion on adjacent segments","volume":"28","author":"Wang CS","year":"2012","unstructured":"Wang CS, Chang JH, Chang TS, Chen HY, Cheng CW. Loading effects of anterior cervical spine fusion on adjacent segments. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2012;28(11):586\u2013594. doi:10.1016\/j.kjms.2012.04.024"},{"issue":"6","key":"b23","series-title":"J Neurosurg Spine","first-page":"733","article-title":"Are there differences in the reoperation rates for operative adjacent-segment disease between ALIF+PS, PLIF+PS, TLIF+PS and LLIF+PS? An analysis of a cohort of 5291 patients","volume":"40","author":"Bains RR","year":"2024","unstructured":"Bains RR, Royse KE, Fennessy J, Are there differences in the reoperation rates for operative adjacent-segment disease between ALIF+PS, PLIF+PS, TLIF+PS and LLIF+PS? An analysis of a cohort of 5291 patients. J Neurosurg Spine. 2024;40(6):733\u2013740. doi:10.3171\/2023.12.SPINE231251"},{"issue":"13","key":"b24","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","first-page":"920","article-title":"Lateral mass screws versus pedicle screws at C7: reoperation rates for operative adjacent segment disease and nonunion in posterior cervical fusion","volume":"48","author":"Brara HS","year":"2023","unstructured":"Brara HS, Royse KE, Fennessy J, Harris JE, Guppy KH. Lateral mass screws versus pedicle screws at C7: reoperation rates for operative adjacent segment disease and nonunion in posterior cervical fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2023;48(13):920\u2013929. doi:10.1097\/BRS.0000000000004597"},{"issue":"3","key":"b25","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","first-page":"261","article-title":"No difference in reoperation rates for adjacent segment disease (operative adjacent segment disease) in posterior cervical fusions stopping at C7 versus T1\/T2: a cohort of 875 patients\u2014Part 1","volume":"47","author":"Guppy KH","year":"2022","unstructured":"Guppy KH, Royse KE, Fennessy J, Norheim EP, Harris JE, Brara HS. No difference in reoperation rates for adjacent segment disease (operative adjacent segment disease) in posterior cervical fusions stopping at C7 versus T1\/T2: a cohort of 875 patients\u2014Part 1. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2022;47(3):261\u2013268. doi:10.1097\/BRS.0000000000004184"},{"issue":"6","key":"b26","series-title":"J Neurosurg Spine","first-page":"773","article-title":"Incidence and risk factors of heterotopic ossification after cervical Baguera C disc arthroplasty","volume":"40","author":"Chung KC","year":"2024","unstructured":"Chung KC, Huang CW, Chen WH, Incidence and risk factors of heterotopic ossification after cervical Baguera C disc arthroplasty. J Neurosurg Spine. 2024;40(6):773\u2013781. doi:10.3171\/2024.1.SPINE23744"},{"issue":"6","key":"b27","series-title":"J Clin Med","first-page":"1589","article-title":"Risk factors for cervical disc arthroplasty subsidence with Bryan Disc\u2014a retrospective observational analysis","volume":"13","author":"Lee CY","year":"2024","unstructured":"Lee CY, Tung KK, Tsou HK, Risk factors for cervical disc arthroplasty subsidence with Bryan Disc\u2014a retrospective observational analysis. J Clin Med. 2024;13(6):1589. doi:10.3390\/jcm13061589"},{"issue":"3","key":"b28","series-title":"Asian Spine J","first-page":"471","article-title":"Reoperations following cervical disc replacement","volume":"9","author":"Skovrlj B","year":"2015","unstructured":"Skovrlj B, Lee DH, Caridi JM, Cho SK. Reoperations following cervical disc replacement. Asian Spine J. 2015;9(3):471\u2013482. doi:10.4184\/asj.2015.9.3.471"},{"issue":"6","key":"b29","series-title":"J Neurosurg Spine","first-page":"594","article-title":"Differences between 1- and 2-level cervical arthroplasty: more heterotopic ossification in 2-level disc replacement: clinical article","volume":"16","author":"Wu JC","year":"2012","unstructured":"Wu JC, Huang WC, Tsai HW, Differences between 1- and 2-level cervical arthroplasty: more heterotopic ossification in 2-level disc replacement: clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine. 2012;16(6):594\u2013600. doi:10.3171\/2012.2.SPINE111066"},{"issue":"11","key":"b30","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","first-page":"759","article-title":"Comparison of clinical outcomes of 1- and 2-level total disc replacement: four-year results from a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter IDE clinical trial","volume":"40","author":"Bae HW","year":"2015","unstructured":"Bae HW, Kim KD, Nunley PD, Comparison of clinical outcomes of 1- and 2-level total disc replacement: four-year results from a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter IDE clinical trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015;40(11):759\u2013766. doi:10.1097\/BRS.0000000000000887"},{"issue":"6","key":"b31","series-title":"Int J Spine Surg","first-page":"551","article-title":"One-level versus 2-level treatment with cervical disc arthroplasty or fusion: outcomes up to 7 years","volume":"13","author":"Gornet MF","year":"2019","unstructured":"Gornet MF, Lanman TH, Burkus JK, One-level versus 2-level treatment with cervical disc arthroplasty or fusion: outcomes up to 7 years. Int J Spine Surg. 2019;13(6):551\u2013560. doi:10.14444\/6076"},{"issue":"9","key":"b32","series-title":"Eur Spine J","first-page":"1417","article-title":"Comparison between single- and multi-level patients: clinical and radiological outcomes 2 years after cervical disc replacement","volume":"20","author":"Huppert J","year":"2011","unstructured":"Huppert J, Beaurain J, Steib JP, Comparison between single- and multi-level patients: clinical and radiological outcomes 2 years after cervical disc replacement. Eur Spine J. 2011;20(9):1417\u20131426. doi:10.1007\/s00586-011-1722-9"},{"issue":"2","key":"b33","series-title":"Perm J","first-page":"87","article-title":"Comparing Kaiser Permanente members to the general population: implications for generalizability of research","volume":"27","author":"Davis AC","year":"2023","unstructured":"Davis AC, Voelkel JL, Remmers CL, Adams JL, McGlynn EA. Comparing Kaiser Permanente members to the general population: implications for generalizability of research. Perm J. 2023;27(2):87\u201398. doi:10.7812\/TPP\/22.172"},{"issue":"6","key":"b34","series-title":"Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf","first-page":"246","article-title":"Kaiser Permanente implant registries benefit patient safety, quality improvement, cost-effectiveness","volume":"39","author":"Paxton EW","year":"2013","unstructured":"Paxton EW, Kiley ML, Love R, Barber TC, Funahashi TT, Inacio MC. Kaiser Permanente implant registries benefit patient safety, quality improvement, cost-effectiveness. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2013;39(6):246\u2013252. doi:10.1016\/s1553-7250(13)39033-3"},{"issue":"10","key":"b35","series-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am","first-page":"843","article-title":"A 20-year prospective longitudinal study of degeneration of the cervical spine in a volunteer cohort assessed using MRI: follow-up of a cross-sectional study","volume":"100","author":"Daimon K","year":"2018","unstructured":"Daimon K, Fujiwara H, Nishiwaki Y, A 20-year prospective longitudinal study of degeneration of the cervical spine in a volunteer cohort assessed using MRI: follow-up of a cross-sectional study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018;100(10):843\u2013849. doi:10.2106\/JBJS.17.01347"},{"issue":"10","key":"b36","series-title":"Eur Spine J","first-page":"2675","article-title":"Trends and patterns of cervical degenerative disc disease: an analysis of magnetic resonance imaging of 1300 symptomatic patients","volume":"31","author":"Mesregah MK","year":"2022","unstructured":"Mesregah MK, Repajic M, Mgbam P, Fresquez Z, Wang JC, Buser Z. Trends and patterns of cervical degenerative disc disease: an analysis of magnetic resonance imaging of 1300 symptomatic patients. Eur Spine J. 2022;31(10):2675\u20132683. doi:10.1007\/s00586-022-07336-2"},{"issue":"2","key":"b37","series-title":"Eur Spine J","first-page":"431","article-title":"Radiographic cervical spine degenerative findings: a study on a large population from age 18 to 97 years","volume":"30","author":"Tao Y","year":"2021","unstructured":"Tao Y, Galbusera F, Niemeyer F, Samartzis D, Vogele D, Wilke HJ. Radiographic cervical spine degenerative findings: a study on a large population from age 18 to 97 years. Eur Spine J. 2021;30(2):431\u2013443. doi:10.1007\/s00586-020-06615-0"},{"issue":"3","key":"b38","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","first-page":"160","article-title":"Reoperation risks between cervical disc arthroplasty and anterior cervical discectomy with fusion: it is not always about adjacent segment disease","volume":"51","author":"Alsalek S","year":"2026","unstructured":"Alsalek S, Chang RN, Harary M, Reoperation risks between cervical disc arthroplasty and anterior cervical discectomy with fusion: it is not always about adjacent segment disease. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2026;51(3):160\u2013169. doi:10.1097\/BRS.0000000000005553"},{"issue":"12","key":"b39","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","first-page":"1337","article-title":"Superiority of multilevel cervical arthroplasty outcomes versus single-level outcomes: 229 consecutive PCM prostheses","volume":"32","author":"Pimenta L","year":"2007","unstructured":"Pimenta L, McAfee PC, Cappuccino A, Cunningham BW, Diaz R, Coutinho E. Superiority of multilevel cervical arthroplasty outcomes versus single-level outcomes: 229 consecutive PCM prostheses. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007;32(12):1337\u20131344. doi:10.1097\/BRS.0b013e318059af12"},{"issue":"10","key":"b40","series-title":"Arch Orthop Trauma Surg","first-page":"1343","article-title":"Risk factors for subsidence in anterior cervical fusion with stand-alone polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages: a review of 82 cases and 182 levels","volume":"134","author":"Kao TH","year":"2014","unstructured":"Kao TH, Wu CH, Chou YC, Chen HT, Chen WH, Tsou HK. Risk factors for subsidence in anterior cervical fusion with stand-alone polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages: a review of 82 cases and 182 levels. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2014;134(10):1343\u20131351. doi:10.1007\/s00402-014-2047-z"},{"issue":"5","key":"b41","series-title":"Spine J","first-page":"372","article-title":"Factors affecting reoperations after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion within and outside of a Federal Drug Administration investigational device exemption cervical disc replacement trial","volume":"12","author":"Singh K","year":"2012","unstructured":"Singh K, Phillips FM, Park DK, Pelton MA, An HS, Goldberg EJ. Factors affecting reoperations after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion within and outside of a Federal Drug Administration investigational device exemption cervical disc replacement trial. Spine J. 2012;12(5):372\u2013378. doi:10.1016\/j.spinee.2012.02.005"},{"issue":"4","key":"b1","series-title":"J Neurosurg Spine","first-page":"348","article-title":"Prospective, randomized, multicenter study of cervical arthroplasty: 269 patients from the Kineflex|C artificial disc investigational device exemption study with a minimum 2-year follow-up: clinical article","volume":"15","author":"Coric D","year":"2011","unstructured":"Coric D, Nunley PD, Guyer RD, Prospective, randomized, multicenter study of cervical arthroplasty: 269 patients from the Kineflex|C artificial disc investigational device exemption study with a minimum 2-year follow-up: clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine. 2011;15(4):348\u2013358. doi:10.3171\/2011.5.SPINE10769"},{"issue":"2","key":"b2","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","first-page":"101","article-title":"Comparison of BRYAN cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical decompression and fusion: clinical and radiographic results of a randomized, controlled, clinical trial","volume":"34","author":"Heller JG","year":"2009","unstructured":"Heller JG, Sasso RC, Papadopoulos SM, Comparison of BRYAN cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical decompression and fusion: clinical and radiographic results of a randomized, controlled, clinical trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009;34(2):101\u2013107. doi:10.1097\/BRS.0b013e31818ee263"},{"key":"b3","series-title":"Int J Spine Surg","first-page":"7","article-title":"Multi-center, prospective, randomized, controlled investigational device exemption clinical trial comparing Mobi-C Cervical Artificial Disc to anterior discectomy and fusion in the treatment of symptomatic degenerative disc disease in the cervical spine","volume":"8","author":"Hisey MS","year":"2014","unstructured":"Hisey MS, Bae HW, Davis R, Multi-center, prospective, randomized, controlled investigational device exemption clinical trial comparing Mobi-C Cervical Artificial Disc to anterior discectomy and fusion in the treatment of symptomatic degenerative disc disease in the cervical spine. Int J Spine Surg. 2014;8:7. doi:10.14444\/1007"},{"issue":"4","key":"b4","series-title":"J Spinal Disord Tech","first-page":"E237","article-title":"Prospective, randomized comparison of cervical total disk replacement versus anterior cervical fusion: results at 48 months follow-up","volume":"28","author":"Hisey MS","year":"2015","unstructured":"Hisey MS, Bae HW, Davis RJ, Prospective, randomized comparison of cervical total disk replacement versus anterior cervical fusion: results at 48 months follow-up. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2015;28(4):E237\u2013E243. doi:10.1097\/BSD.0000000000000185"},{"issue":"3","key":"b5","series-title":"J Neurosurg Spine","first-page":"198","article-title":"Clinical and radiographic analysis of cervical disc arthroplasty compared with allograft fusion: a randomized controlled clinical trial","volume":"6","author":"Mummaneni PV","year":"2007","unstructured":"Mummaneni PV, Burkus JK, Haid RW, Traynelis VC, Zdeblick TA. Clinical and radiographic analysis of cervical disc arthroplasty compared with allograft fusion: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Neurosurg Spine. 2007;6(3):198\u2013209. doi:10.3171\/spi.2007.6.3.198"},{"issue":"4","key":"b6","series-title":"Spine J","first-page":"275","article-title":"Results of the prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-C total disc replacement versus anterior discectomy and fusion for the treatment of 1-level symptomatic cervical disc disease","volume":"9","author":"Murrey D","year":"2009","unstructured":"Murrey D, Janssen M, Delamarter R, Results of the prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-C total disc replacement versus anterior discectomy and fusion for the treatment of 1-level symptomatic cervical disc disease. Spine J. 2009;9(4):275\u2013286. doi:10.1016\/j.spinee.2008.05.006"},{"issue":"15","key":"b7","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","first-page":"E907","article-title":"A prospective, randomized, controlled clinical investigation comparing PCM cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. 2-year results from the US FDA IDE clinical trial","volume":"38","author":"Phillips FM","year":"2013","unstructured":"Phillips FM, Lee JYB, Geisler FH, A prospective, randomized, controlled clinical investigation comparing PCM cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. 2-year results from the US FDA IDE clinical trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013;38(15):E907\u2013E918. doi:10.1097\/BRS.0b013e318296232f"},{"issue":"5","key":"b8","series-title":"Clin Spine Surg","first-page":"E515","article-title":"Cervical disk replacement with Discover versus fusion in a single-level cervical disk disease: a prospective single-center randomized trial with a minimum 2-year follow-up","volume":"30","author":"Ro\u017eankovi\u0107 M","year":"2017","unstructured":"Ro\u017eankovi\u0107 M, Marasanov SM, Vuki\u0107 M. Cervical disk replacement with Discover versus fusion in a single-level cervical disk disease: a prospective single-center randomized trial with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Clin Spine Surg. 2017;30(5):E515\u2013E522. doi:10.1097\/BSD.0000000000000170"},{"issue":"11","key":"b9","series-title":"Orthopedics","first-page":"889","article-title":"Results of cervical arthroplasty compared with anterior discectomy and fusion: four-year clinical outcomes in a prospective, randomized controlled trial","volume":"34","author":"Sasso RC","year":"2011","unstructured":"Sasso RC, Anderson PA, Riew KD, Heller JG. Results of cervical arthroplasty compared with anterior discectomy and fusion: four-year clinical outcomes in a prospective, randomized controlled trial. Orthopedics. 2011;34(11):889. doi:10.3928\/01477447-20110922-24"},{"issue":"6","key":"b10","series-title":"Spine J","first-page":"1284","article-title":"The Discover artificial disc replacement versus fusion in cervical radiculopathy\u2014a randomized controlled outcome trial with 2-year follow-up","volume":"15","author":"Skeppholm M","year":"2015","unstructured":"Skeppholm M, Lindgren L, Henriques T, Vavruch L, L\u00f6fgren H, Olerud C. The Discover artificial disc replacement versus fusion in cervical radiculopathy\u2014a randomized controlled outcome trial with 2-year follow-up. Spine J. 2015;15(6):1284\u20131294. doi:10.1016\/j.spinee.2015.02.039"},{"issue":"26","key":"b11","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","first-page":"2227","article-title":"Clinical outcomes with selectively constrained SECURE-C cervical disc arthroplasty: two-year results from a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter investigational device exemption study","volume":"38","author":"Vaccaro A","year":"2013","unstructured":"Vaccaro A, Beutler W, Peppelman W, Clinical outcomes with selectively constrained SECURE-C cervical disc arthroplasty: two-year results from a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter investigational device exemption study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013;38(26):2227\u20132239. doi:10.1097\/BRS.0000000000000031"},{"issue":"12","key":"b12","series-title":"Int Orthop","first-page":"2533","article-title":"A prospective, randomised, controlled multicentre study comparing cervical disc replacement with anterior cervical decompression and fusion","volume":"38","author":"Zhang HX","year":"2014","unstructured":"Zhang HX, Shao YD, Chen Y, A prospective, randomised, controlled multicentre study comparing cervical disc replacement with anterior cervical decompression and fusion. Int Orthop. 2014;38(12):2533\u20132541. doi:10.1007\/s00264-014-2497-5"},{"issue":"3","key":"b13","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","first-page":"203","article-title":"ProDisc-C and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion as surgical treatment for single-level cervical symptomatic degenerative disc disease: five-year results of a Food and Drug Administration study","volume":"38","author":"Zigler JE","year":"2013","unstructured":"Zigler JE, Delamarter R, Murrey D, Spivak J, Janssen M. ProDisc-C and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion as surgical treatment for single-level cervical symptomatic degenerative disc disease: five-year results of a Food and Drug Administration study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013;38(3):203\u2013209. doi:10.1097\/BRS.0b013e318278eb38"},{"issue":"5","key":"b14","series-title":"J Neurosurg Spine","first-page":"532","article-title":"Cervical total disc replacement with the Mobi-C cervical artificial disc compared with anterior discectomy and fusion for treatment of 2-level symptomatic degenerative disc disease: a prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter clinical trial: clinical article","volume":"19","author":"Davis RJ","year":"2013","unstructured":"Davis RJ, Kim KD, Hisey MS, Cervical total disc replacement with the Mobi-C cervical artificial disc compared with anterior discectomy and fusion for treatment of 2-level symptomatic degenerative disc disease: a prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter clinical trial: clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine. 2013;19(5):532\u2013545. doi:10.3171\/2013.6.SPINE12527"},{"issue":"3","key":"b15","series-title":"J Neurosurg Spine","first-page":"252","article-title":"Prospective, randomized multicenter study of cervical arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: 5-year results with a metal-on-metal artificial disc","volume":"28","author":"Coric D","year":"2018","unstructured":"Coric D, Guyer RD, Nunley PD, Prospective, randomized multicenter study of cervical arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: 5-year results with a metal-on-metal artificial disc. J Neurosurg Spine. 2018;28(3):252\u2013261. doi:10.3171\/2017.5.SPINE16824"},{"issue":"4","key":"b16","series-title":"J Neurosurg Spine","first-page":"508","article-title":"Two-level cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: 10-year outcomes of a prospective, randomized investigational device exemption clinical trial","volume":"31","author":"Gornet MF","year":"2019","unstructured":"Gornet MF, Lanman TH, Burkus JK, Two-level cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: 10-year outcomes of a prospective, randomized investigational device exemption clinical trial. J Neurosurg Spine. 2019;31(4):508\u2013518. doi:10.3171\/2019.4.SPINE19157"},{"issue":"3","key":"b17","series-title":"Neurosurgery","first-page":"497","article-title":"Ten-year outcomes of 1- and 2-level cervical disc arthroplasty from the Mobi-C investigational device exemption clinical trial","volume":"88","author":"Kim K","year":"2021","unstructured":"Kim K, Hoffman G, Bae H, Ten-year outcomes of 1- and 2-level cervical disc arthroplasty from the Mobi-C investigational device exemption clinical trial. Neurosurgery. 2021;88(3):497\u2013505. doi:10.1093\/neuros\/nyaa459"},{"issue":"4","key":"b18","series-title":"Int J Spine Surg","first-page":"31","article-title":"Long-term evaluation of cervical disc arthroplasty with the Mobi-C\u00a9 cervical disc: a randomized, prospective, multicenter clinical trial with seven-year follow-up","volume":"11","author":"Radcliff K","year":"2017","unstructured":"Radcliff K, Davis RJ, Hisey MS, Long-term evaluation of cervical disc arthroplasty with the Mobi-C\u00a9 cervical disc: a randomized, prospective, multicenter clinical trial with seven-year follow-up. Int J Spine Surg. 2017;11(4):31. doi:10.14444\/4031"},{"issue":"1","key":"b19","series-title":"J Neurosurg Spine","first-page":"33","article-title":"Changes in adjacent-level disc pressure and facet joint force after cervical arthroplasty compared with cervical discectomy and fusion","volume":"7","author":"Chang UK","year":"2007","unstructured":"Chang UK, Kim DH, Lee MC, Willenberg R, Kim SH, Lim J. Changes in adjacent-level disc pressure and facet joint force after cervical arthroplasty compared with cervical discectomy and fusion. J Neurosurg Spine. 2007;7(1):33\u201339. doi:10.3171\/SPI-07\/07\/033"},{"issue":"6 suppl","key":"b20","series-title":"Spine J","first-page":"190S","article-title":"Adjacent segment degeneration and adjacent segment disease: the consequences of spinal fusion","volume":"4","author":"Hilibrand AS","year":"2004","unstructured":"Hilibrand AS, Robbins M. Adjacent segment degeneration and adjacent segment disease: the consequences of spinal fusion? Spine J. 2004;4(6 suppl):190S-194S. doi:10.1016\/j.spinee.2004.07.007"},{"issue":"24","key":"b21","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","first-page":"2788","article-title":"Does anterior plating of the cervical spine predispose to adjacent segment changes?","volume":"30","author":"Rao RD","year":"2005","unstructured":"Rao RD, Wang M, McGrady LM, Perlewitz TJ, David KS. Does anterior plating of the cervical spine predispose to adjacent segment changes? Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005;30(24):2788\u20132792. doi:10.1097\/01.brs.0000190453.46472.08"},{"issue":"11","key":"b22","series-title":"Kaohsiung J Med Sci","first-page":"586","article-title":"Loading effects of anterior cervical spine fusion on adjacent segments","volume":"28","author":"Wang CS","year":"2012","unstructured":"Wang CS, Chang JH, Chang TS, Chen HY, Cheng CW. Loading effects of anterior cervical spine fusion on adjacent segments. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2012;28(11):586\u2013594. doi:10.1016\/j.kjms.2012.04.024"},{"issue":"6","key":"b23","series-title":"J Neurosurg Spine","first-page":"733","article-title":"Are there differences in the reoperation rates for operative adjacent-segment disease between ALIF+PS, PLIF+PS, TLIF+PS and LLIF+PS? An analysis of a cohort of 5291 patients","volume":"40","author":"Bains RR","year":"2024","unstructured":"Bains RR, Royse KE, Fennessy J, Are there differences in the reoperation rates for operative adjacent-segment disease between ALIF+PS, PLIF+PS, TLIF+PS and LLIF+PS? An analysis of a cohort of 5291 patients. J Neurosurg Spine. 2024;40(6):733\u2013740. doi:10.3171\/2023.12.SPINE231251"},{"issue":"13","key":"b24","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","first-page":"920","article-title":"Lateral mass screws versus pedicle screws at C7: reoperation rates for operative adjacent segment disease and nonunion in posterior cervical fusion","volume":"48","author":"Brara HS","year":"2023","unstructured":"Brara HS, Royse KE, Fennessy J, Harris JE, Guppy KH. Lateral mass screws versus pedicle screws at C7: reoperation rates for operative adjacent segment disease and nonunion in posterior cervical fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2023;48(13):920\u2013929. doi:10.1097\/BRS.0000000000004597"},{"issue":"3","key":"b25","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","first-page":"261","article-title":"No difference in reoperation rates for adjacent segment disease (operative adjacent segment disease) in posterior cervical fusions stopping at C7 versus T1\/T2: a cohort of 875 patients\u2014Part 1","volume":"47","author":"Guppy KH","year":"2022","unstructured":"Guppy KH, Royse KE, Fennessy J, Norheim EP, Harris JE, Brara HS. No difference in reoperation rates for adjacent segment disease (operative adjacent segment disease) in posterior cervical fusions stopping at C7 versus T1\/T2: a cohort of 875 patients\u2014Part 1. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2022;47(3):261\u2013268. doi:10.1097\/BRS.0000000000004184"},{"issue":"6","key":"b26","series-title":"J Neurosurg Spine","first-page":"773","article-title":"Incidence and risk factors of heterotopic ossification after cervical Baguera C disc arthroplasty","volume":"40","author":"Chung KC","year":"2024","unstructured":"Chung KC, Huang CW, Chen WH, Incidence and risk factors of heterotopic ossification after cervical Baguera C disc arthroplasty. J Neurosurg Spine. 2024;40(6):773\u2013781. doi:10.3171\/2024.1.SPINE23744"},{"issue":"6","key":"b27","series-title":"J Clin Med","first-page":"1589","article-title":"Risk factors for cervical disc arthroplasty subsidence with Bryan Disc\u2014a retrospective observational analysis","volume":"13","author":"Lee CY","year":"2024","unstructured":"Lee CY, Tung KK, Tsou HK, Risk factors for cervical disc arthroplasty subsidence with Bryan Disc\u2014a retrospective observational analysis. J Clin Med. 2024;13(6):1589. doi:10.3390\/jcm13061589"},{"issue":"3","key":"b28","series-title":"Asian Spine J","first-page":"471","article-title":"Reoperations following cervical disc replacement","volume":"9","author":"Skovrlj B","year":"2015","unstructured":"Skovrlj B, Lee DH, Caridi JM, Cho SK. Reoperations following cervical disc replacement. Asian Spine J. 2015;9(3):471\u2013482. doi:10.4184\/asj.2015.9.3.471"},{"issue":"6","key":"b29","series-title":"J Neurosurg Spine","first-page":"594","article-title":"Differences between 1- and 2-level cervical arthroplasty: more heterotopic ossification in 2-level disc replacement: clinical article","volume":"16","author":"Wu JC","year":"2012","unstructured":"Wu JC, Huang WC, Tsai HW, Differences between 1- and 2-level cervical arthroplasty: more heterotopic ossification in 2-level disc replacement: clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine. 2012;16(6):594\u2013600. doi:10.3171\/2012.2.SPINE111066"},{"issue":"11","key":"b30","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","first-page":"759","article-title":"Comparison of clinical outcomes of 1- and 2-level total disc replacement: four-year results from a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter IDE clinical trial","volume":"40","author":"Bae HW","year":"2015","unstructured":"Bae HW, Kim KD, Nunley PD, Comparison of clinical outcomes of 1- and 2-level total disc replacement: four-year results from a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter IDE clinical trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015;40(11):759\u2013766. doi:10.1097\/BRS.0000000000000887"},{"issue":"6","key":"b31","series-title":"Int J Spine Surg","first-page":"551","article-title":"One-level versus 2-level treatment with cervical disc arthroplasty or fusion: outcomes up to 7 years","volume":"13","author":"Gornet MF","year":"2019","unstructured":"Gornet MF, Lanman TH, Burkus JK, One-level versus 2-level treatment with cervical disc arthroplasty or fusion: outcomes up to 7 years. Int J Spine Surg. 2019;13(6):551\u2013560. doi:10.14444\/6076"},{"issue":"9","key":"b32","series-title":"Eur Spine J","first-page":"1417","article-title":"Comparison between single- and multi-level patients: clinical and radiological outcomes 2 years after cervical disc replacement","volume":"20","author":"Huppert J","year":"2011","unstructured":"Huppert J, Beaurain J, Steib JP, Comparison between single- and multi-level patients: clinical and radiological outcomes 2 years after cervical disc replacement. Eur Spine J. 2011;20(9):1417\u20131426. doi:10.1007\/s00586-011-1722-9"},{"issue":"2","key":"b33","series-title":"Perm J","first-page":"87","article-title":"Comparing Kaiser Permanente members to the general population: implications for generalizability of research","volume":"27","author":"Davis AC","year":"2023","unstructured":"Davis AC, Voelkel JL, Remmers CL, Adams JL, McGlynn EA. Comparing Kaiser Permanente members to the general population: implications for generalizability of research. Perm J. 2023;27(2):87\u201398. doi:10.7812\/TPP\/22.172"},{"issue":"6","key":"b34","series-title":"Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf","first-page":"246","article-title":"Kaiser Permanente implant registries benefit patient safety, quality improvement, cost-effectiveness","volume":"39","author":"Paxton EW","year":"2013","unstructured":"Paxton EW, Kiley ML, Love R, Barber TC, Funahashi TT, Inacio MC. Kaiser Permanente implant registries benefit patient safety, quality improvement, cost-effectiveness. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2013;39(6):246\u2013252. doi:10.1016\/s1553-7250(13)39033-3"},{"issue":"10","key":"b35","series-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am","first-page":"843","article-title":"A 20-year prospective longitudinal study of degeneration of the cervical spine in a volunteer cohort assessed using MRI: follow-up of a cross-sectional study","volume":"100","author":"Daimon K","year":"2018","unstructured":"Daimon K, Fujiwara H, Nishiwaki Y, A 20-year prospective longitudinal study of degeneration of the cervical spine in a volunteer cohort assessed using MRI: follow-up of a cross-sectional study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018;100(10):843\u2013849. doi:10.2106\/JBJS.17.01347"},{"issue":"10","key":"b36","series-title":"Eur Spine J","first-page":"2675","article-title":"Trends and patterns of cervical degenerative disc disease: an analysis of magnetic resonance imaging of 1300 symptomatic patients","volume":"31","author":"Mesregah MK","year":"2022","unstructured":"Mesregah MK, Repajic M, Mgbam P, Fresquez Z, Wang JC, Buser Z. Trends and patterns of cervical degenerative disc disease: an analysis of magnetic resonance imaging of 1300 symptomatic patients. Eur Spine J. 2022;31(10):2675\u20132683. doi:10.1007\/s00586-022-07336-2"},{"issue":"2","key":"b37","series-title":"Eur Spine J","first-page":"431","article-title":"Radiographic cervical spine degenerative findings: a study on a large population from age 18 to 97 years","volume":"30","author":"Tao Y","year":"2021","unstructured":"Tao Y, Galbusera F, Niemeyer F, Samartzis D, Vogele D, Wilke HJ. Radiographic cervical spine degenerative findings: a study on a large population from age 18 to 97 years. Eur Spine J. 2021;30(2):431\u2013443. doi:10.1007\/s00586-020-06615-0"},{"issue":"3","key":"b38","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","first-page":"160","article-title":"Reoperation risks between cervical disc arthroplasty and anterior cervical discectomy with fusion: it is not always about adjacent segment disease","volume":"51","author":"Alsalek S","year":"2026","unstructured":"Alsalek S, Chang RN, Harary M, Reoperation risks between cervical disc arthroplasty and anterior cervical discectomy with fusion: it is not always about adjacent segment disease. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2026;51(3):160\u2013169. doi:10.1097\/BRS.0000000000005553"},{"issue":"12","key":"b39","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","first-page":"1337","article-title":"Superiority of multilevel cervical arthroplasty outcomes versus single-level outcomes: 229 consecutive PCM prostheses","volume":"32","author":"Pimenta L","year":"2007","unstructured":"Pimenta L, McAfee PC, Cappuccino A, Cunningham BW, Diaz R, Coutinho E. Superiority of multilevel cervical arthroplasty outcomes versus single-level outcomes: 229 consecutive PCM prostheses. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007;32(12):1337\u20131344. doi:10.1097\/BRS.0b013e318059af12"},{"issue":"10","key":"b40","series-title":"Arch Orthop Trauma Surg","first-page":"1343","article-title":"Risk factors for subsidence in anterior cervical fusion with stand-alone polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages: a review of 82 cases and 182 levels","volume":"134","author":"Kao TH","year":"2014","unstructured":"Kao TH, Wu CH, Chou YC, Chen HT, Chen WH, Tsou HK. Risk factors for subsidence in anterior cervical fusion with stand-alone polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages: a review of 82 cases and 182 levels. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2014;134(10):1343\u20131351. doi:10.1007\/s00402-014-2047-z"},{"issue":"5","key":"b41","series-title":"Spine J","first-page":"372","article-title":"Factors affecting reoperations after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion within and outside of a Federal Drug Administration investigational device exemption cervical disc replacement trial","volume":"12","author":"Singh K","year":"2012","unstructured":"Singh K, Phillips FM, Park DK, Pelton MA, An HS, Goldberg EJ. Factors affecting reoperations after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion within and outside of a Federal Drug Administration investigational device exemption cervical disc replacement trial. Spine J. 2012;12(5):372\u2013378. doi:10.1016\/j.spinee.2012.02.005"}],"container-title":["Neurosurgical Focus"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/thejns.org\/view\/journals\/neurosurg-focus\/61\/1\/article-pE3.xml","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/thejns.org\/downloadpdf\/journals\/neurosurg-focus\/61\/1\/article-pE3.xml","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"syndication"},{"URL":"https:\/\/thejns.org\/downloadpdf\/journals\/neurosurg-focus\/61\/1\/article-pE3.xml","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,8]],"date-time":"2026-07-08T00:01:01Z","timestamp":1783468861000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/thejns.org\/view\/journals\/neurosurg-focus\/61\/1\/article-pE3.xml"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,1]]},"references-count":82,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1"},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3171\/2026.3.focus251150","relation":{},"ISSN":["1092-0684"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1092-0684","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,1]]}}}