{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,6]],"date-time":"2026-02-06T05:11:41Z","timestamp":1770354701326,"version":"3.49.0"},"reference-count":52,"publisher":"Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG)","issue":"11","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,3,14]],"date-time":"2022-03-14T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1647216000000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,3,14]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>BACKGROUND<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Cervical disc replacement (CDR) is an increasingly used alternative to fusion for symptomatic cervical disc disease. While more studies have suggested favorability of CDR over fusion procedures, limited data exist regarding implant fatigability. Here, the authors present a unique and previously unreported failure of the M6-C prosthesis causing spinal cord injury.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>OBSERVATIONS<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>A 49-year-old female with history of cervical degenerative disease and prior C4\u20137 M6-C arthroplasty presented 9 years later after a minor fall from standing. She endorsed bilateral hand numbness ascending to forearms and shoulders, with dysesthesias and weakness. Imaging showed fractured arthroplasty penetrating the spinal cord. Revision surgery found a ruptured arthroplasty annulus with metal piece piercing the spinal cord. Partial C4 and C5 corpectomy was performed to remove the integrated fins of the arthroplasty and inspect the cord and dura. This was reconstructed with a corpectomy cage and plate. The patient made an excellent recovery, with improvement in her weakness and resolution of her sensory symptoms.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>LESSONS<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Possibility of fatigue-related failures presenting years after implantation have only been infrequently reported but can be catastrophic for patients. The authors encourage further discussions in this area, increased counseling with patients, and recommend a patient registry to better document adverse events.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.3171\/case21731","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,3,14]],"date-time":"2022-03-14T03:07:43Z","timestamp":1647227263000},"source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"title":["Catastrophic delayed cervical arthroplasty failure: illustrative case"],"prefix":"10.3171","volume":"3","author":[{"given":"Diego A.","family":"Carrera","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Neurological Surgery, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Christian B.","family":"Ricks","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Neurological Surgery, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"1754","reference":[{"issue":"20","key":"b1","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S186","DOI":"10.1097\/01.BRS.0000092212.42388.79","article-title":"Wear analysis of the Bryan Cervical Disc prosthesis","volume":"28","author":"Anderson PA","year":"2003","unstructured":"Anderson PA, Rouleau JP, Bryan VE, Carlson CS. Wear analysis of the Bryan Cervical Disc prosthesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003;28(20):S186\u2013S194.10.1097\/01.BRS.0000092212.42388.79"},{"issue":"3","key":"b2","series-title":"Neurosurgery","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"679","DOI":"10.1227\/01.NEU.0000377039.89725.F3","article-title":"Longitudinal prospective long-term radiographic follow-up after treatment of single-level cervical disk disease with the Bryan Cervical Disc","volume":"67","author":"Walraevens J","year":"2010","unstructured":"Walraevens J, Demaerel P, Suetens P,  Longitudinal prospective long-term radiographic follow-up after treatment of single-level cervical disk disease with the Bryan Cervical Disc. Neurosurgery. 2010;67(3):679\u2013687.10.1227\/01.NEU.0000377039.89725.F3"},{"issue":"22","key":"b3","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1543","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000002665","article-title":"The seven-year cost-effectiveness of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus cervical disc arthroplasty: a Markov analysis","volume":"43","author":"Kim JS","year":"2018","unstructured":"Kim JS, Dowdell J, Cheung ZB,  The seven-year cost-effectiveness of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus cervical disc arthroplasty: a Markov analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018;43(22):1543\u20131551.10.1097\/BRS.0000000000002665"},{"issue":"1","key":"b4","series-title":"Spine J","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"63","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.06.036","article-title":"The 5-year cost-effectiveness of two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion or cervical disc replacement: a Markov analysis","volume":"18","author":"Overley SC","year":"2018","unstructured":"Overley SC, McAnany SJ, Brochin RL, Kim JS, Merrill RK, Qureshi SA. The 5-year cost-effectiveness of two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion or cervical disc replacement: a Markov analysis. Spine J. 2018;18(1):63\u201371.10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.06.036"},{"issue":"4","key":"b5","series-title":"J Neurosurg Spine","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"516","DOI":"10.3171\/2014.6.SPINE13996","article-title":"Clinical and radiographic analysis of an artificial cervical disc: 7-year follow-up from the Prestige prospective randomized controlled clinical trial: clinical article","volume":"21","author":"Burkus JK","year":"2014","unstructured":"Burkus JK, Traynelis VC, Haid RW Jr, Mummaneni PV. Clinical and radiographic analysis of an artificial cervical disc: 7-year follow-up from the Prestige prospective randomized controlled clinical trial: clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine. 2014;21(4):516\u2013528.10.3171\/2014.6.SPINE13996"},{"issue":"3","key":"b6","series-title":"J Neurosurg Spine","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"252","DOI":"10.3171\/2017.5.SPINE16824","article-title":"Prospective, randomized multicenter study of cervical arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: 5-year results with a metal-on-metal artificial disc","volume":"28","author":"Coric D","year":"2018","unstructured":"Coric D, Guyer RD, Nunley PD,  Prospective, randomized multicenter study of cervical arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: 5-year results with a metal-on-metal artificial disc. J Neurosurg Spine. 2018;28(3):252\u2013261.10.3171\/2017.5.SPINE16824"},{"issue":"8","key":"b7","series-title":"PLoS One","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e0183603","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0183603","article-title":"What\u2019s the best surgical treatment for patients with cervical radiculopathy due to single-level degenerative disease? A randomized controlled trial","volume":"12","author":"Donk RD","year":"2017","unstructured":"Donk RD, Verbeek ALM, Verhagen WIM, Groenewoud H, Hosman AJF, Bartels RHMA. What\u2019s the best surgical treatment for patients with cervical radiculopathy due to single-level degenerative disease? A randomized controlled trial. PLoS One. 2017;12(8):e0183603.10.1371\/journal.pone.0183603"},{"issue":"6","key":"b8","series-title":"Bone Joint J","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"829","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.98B6.36381","article-title":"Effectiveness and safety of Mobi-C for treatment of single-level cervical disc spondylosis: a randomised control trial with a minimum of five years of follow-up","volume":"98-B","author":"Hou Y","year":"2016","unstructured":"Hou Y, Nie L, Pan X,  Effectiveness and safety of Mobi-C for treatment of single-level cervical disc spondylosis: a randomised control trial with a minimum of five years of follow-up. Bone Joint J. 2016;98-B(6):829\u2013833.10.1302\/0301-620X.98B6.36381"},{"issue":"21","key":"b9","series-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1738","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.N.01186","article-title":"ProDisc-C total disc replacement versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for single-level symptomatic cervical disc disease: seven-year follow-up of the prospective randomized U.S. Food and Drug Administration Investigational Device Exemption Study","volume":"97","author":"Janssen ME","year":"2015","unstructured":"Janssen ME, Zigler JE, Spivak JM, Delamarter RB, Darden BV 2nd, Kopjar B. ProDisc-C total disc replacement versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for single-level symptomatic cervical disc disease: seven-year follow-up of the prospective randomized U.S. Food and Drug Administration Investigational Device Exemption Study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015;97(21):1738\u20131747.10.2106\/JBJS.N.01186"},{"issue":"9","key":"b10","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"601","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000002907","article-title":"Ten-year outcomes of cervical disc replacement with the BRYAN Cervical Disc: results from a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial","volume":"44","author":"Lavelle WF","year":"2019","unstructured":"Lavelle WF, Riew KD, Levi AD, Florman JE. Ten-year outcomes of cervical disc replacement with the BRYAN Cervical Disc: results from a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019;44(9):601\u2013608.10.1097\/BRS.0000000000002907"},{"issue":"10","key":"b11","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"674","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000000869","article-title":"Long-term Outcomes of the US FDA IDE prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial Comparing PCM Cervical Disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion","volume":"40","author":"Phillips FM","year":"2015","unstructured":"Phillips FM, Geisler FH, Gilder KM, Reah C, Howell KM, McAfee PC. Long-term Outcomes of the US FDA IDE prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial Comparing PCM Cervical Disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015;40(10):674\u2013683.10.1097\/BRS.0000000000000869"},{"issue":"3","key":"b12","series-title":"Int J Spine Surg","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"377","DOI":"10.14444\/5044","article-title":"Long-term clinical experience with selectively constrained SECURE-C Cervical Artificial Disc for 1-level cervical disc disease: results from seven-year follow-up of a prospective, randomized, controlled investigational device exemption clinical trial","volume":"12","author":"Vaccaro A","year":"2018","unstructured":"Vaccaro A, Beutler W, Peppelman W,  Long-term clinical experience with selectively constrained SECURE-C Cervical Artificial Disc for 1-level cervical disc disease: results from seven-year follow-up of a prospective, randomized, controlled investigational device exemption clinical trial. Int J Spine Surg. 2018;12(3):377\u2013387.10.14444\/5044"},{"issue":"4","key":"b13","series-title":"J Neurosurg Spine","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"508","DOI":"10.3171\/2019.4.SPINE19157","article-title":"Two-level cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: 10-year outcomes of a prospective, randomized investigational device exemption clinical trial","volume":"31","author":"Gornet MF","year":"2019","unstructured":"Gornet MF, Lanman TH, Burkus JK,  Two-level cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: 10-year outcomes of a prospective, randomized investigational device exemption clinical trial. J Neurosurg Spine. 2019;31(4):508\u2013518.10.3171\/2019.4.SPINE19157"},{"issue":"3","key":"b14","series-title":"J Neurosurg Spine","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"323","DOI":"10.3171\/2018.9.SPINE18659","article-title":"Artificial disc replacement versus fusion in patients with cervical degenerative disc disease and radiculopathy: a randomized controlled trial with 5-year outcomes","volume":"30","author":"MacDowall A","year":"2019","unstructured":"MacDowall A, Canto Moreira N, Marques C,  Artificial disc replacement versus fusion in patients with cervical degenerative disc disease and radiculopathy: a randomized controlled trial with 5-year outcomes. J Neurosurg Spine. 2019;30(3):323\u2013331.10.3171\/2018.9.SPINE18659"},{"issue":"4","key":"b15","series-title":"Int J Spine Surg","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"31","DOI":"10.14444\/4031","article-title":"Long-term evaluation of cervical disc arthroplasty with the Mobi-C\u00a9 Cervical Disc: a randomized, prospective, multicenter clinical trial with seven-year follow-up","volume":"11","author":"Radcliff K","year":"2017","unstructured":"Radcliff K, Davis RJ, Hisey MS,  Long-term evaluation of cervical disc arthroplasty with the Mobi-C\u00a9 Cervical Disc: a randomized, prospective, multicenter clinical trial with seven-year follow-up. Int J Spine Surg. 2017;11(4):31.10.14444\/4031"},{"issue":"11","key":"b16","series-title":"Eur Spine J","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2688","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-020-06400-z","article-title":"Complications of cervical total disc replacement and their associations with heterotopic ossification: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"29","author":"Hui N","year":"2020","unstructured":"Hui N, Phan K, Cheng HMK, Lin YH, Mobbs RJ. Complications of cervical total disc replacement and their associations with heterotopic ossification: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Spine J. 2020;29(11):2688\u20132700.10.1007\/s00586-020-06400-z"},{"issue":"6","key":"b17","series-title":"Global Spine J","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"790","DOI":"10.1177\/2192568219881163","article-title":"Prevalence of and risk factors for heterotopic ossification after cervical total disc replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"10","author":"Hui N","year":"2020","unstructured":"Hui N, Phan K, Kerferd J, Lee M, Mobbs RJ. Prevalence of and risk factors for heterotopic ossification after cervical total disc replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Global Spine J. 2020;10(6):790\u2013804.10.1177\/2192568219881163"},{"issue":"6","key":"b18","series-title":"Neurosurgery","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1087","DOI":"10.1093\/neuros\/nyx579","article-title":"Cervical disc arthroplasty: current evidence and real-world application","volume":"83","author":"Nunley PD","year":"2018","unstructured":"Nunley PD, Coric D, Frank KA, Stone MB. Cervical disc arthroplasty: current evidence and real-world application. Neurosurgery. 2018;83(6):1087\u20131106.10.1093\/neuros\/nyx579"},{"issue":"2","key":"b19","series-title":"Neurosurg Focus","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E2","DOI":"10.3171\/2016.11.FOCUS16414","article-title":"Cervical arthroplasty: what does the labeling say?","volume":"42","author":"Turel MK","year":"2017","unstructured":"Turel MK, Kerolus MG, Adogwa O, Traynelis VC. Cervical arthroplasty: what does the labeling say? Neurosurg Focus. 2017;42(2):E2.10.3171\/2016.11.FOCUS16414"},{"key":"b20","series-title":"World Neurosurg","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"598","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2019.10.032","article-title":"Artificial discs in cervical disc replacement: a meta-analysis for comparison of long-term outcomes","volume":"134","author":"Wahood W","year":"2020","unstructured":"Wahood W, Yolcu YU, Kerezoudis P,  Artificial discs in cervical disc replacement: a meta-analysis for comparison of long-term outcomes. World Neurosurg. 2020;134:598\u2013613.e5.10.1016\/j.wneu.2019.10.032"},{"key":"b21","article-title":"M6-C Artificial Cervical Disc","unstructured":"Food and Drug Administration. M6-C Artificial Cervical Disc. Instructions for Use. Important Medical Information. Accessed December 7, 2021. https:\/\/www.accessdata.fda.gov\/cdrh_docs\/pdf17\/P170036D.pdf."},{"key":"b22","series-title":"Int J Spine Surg","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"71","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijsp.2012.02.001","article-title":"Cervical total disc replacement using a novel compressible prosthesis: Results from a prospective Food and Drug Administration-regulated feasibility study with 24-month follow-up","volume":"6","author":"Lauryssen C","year":"2012","unstructured":"Lauryssen C, Coric D, Dimmig T, Musante D, Ohnmeiss DD, Stubbs HA. Cervical total disc replacement using a novel compressible prosthesis: Results from a prospective Food and Drug Administration-regulated feasibility study with 24-month follow-up. Int J Spine Surg. 2012;6:71\u201377.10.1016\/j.ijsp.2012.02.001"},{"issue":"4","key":"b23","series-title":"Clin Spine Surg","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E182","DOI":"10.1097\/BSD.0000000000000025","article-title":"The M6-C Cervical Disk prosthesis: first clinical experience in 33 patients","volume":"29","author":"Thomas S","year":"2016","unstructured":"Thomas S, Willems K, Van den Daelen L, Linden P, Ciocci MC, Bocher P. The M6-C Cervical Disk prosthesis: first clinical experience in 33 patients. Clin Spine Surg. 2016;29(4):E182\u2013E187.10.1097\/BSD.0000000000000025"},{"issue":"4","key":"b24","series-title":"J Spine Surg","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"584","DOI":"10.21037\/jss.2019.11.06","article-title":"M6-C cervical disc replacement failure associated with late onset infection","volume":"5","author":"Xia MM","year":"2019","unstructured":"Xia MM, Winder MJ. M6-C cervical disc replacement failure associated with late onset infection. J Spine Surg. 2019;5(4):584\u2013588.10.21037\/jss.2019.11.06"},{"key":"b25","series-title":"Eur Spine J","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S536","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-014-3677-0","article-title":"Core herniation after implantation of a cervical artificial disc: case report","volume":"24","author":"Brenke C","year":"2015","unstructured":"Brenke C, Schmieder K, Barth M. Core herniation after implantation of a cervical artificial disc: case report. Eur Spine J. 2015;24(suppl 4):S536\u2013S539.10.1007\/s00586-014-3677-0"},{"issue":"11","key":"b26","series-title":"Eur Spine J","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2713","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-019-06064-4","article-title":"Prosthesis design influences segmental contribution to total cervical motion after cervical disc arthroplasty","volume":"29","author":"Patwardhan AG","year":"2020","unstructured":"Patwardhan AG, Havey RM. Prosthesis design influences segmental contribution to total cervical motion after cervical disc arthroplasty. Eur Spine J. 2020;29(11):2713\u20132721.10.1007\/s00586-019-06064-4"},{"issue":"20","key":"b1","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S186","DOI":"10.1097\/01.BRS.0000092212.42388.79","article-title":"Wear analysis of the Bryan Cervical Disc prosthesis","volume":"28","author":"Anderson PA","year":"2003","unstructured":"Anderson PA, Rouleau JP, Bryan VE, Carlson CS. Wear analysis of the Bryan Cervical Disc prosthesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003;28(20):S186\u2013S194.10.1097\/01.BRS.0000092212.42388.79"},{"issue":"3","key":"b2","series-title":"Neurosurgery","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"679","DOI":"10.1227\/01.NEU.0000377039.89725.F3","article-title":"Longitudinal prospective long-term radiographic follow-up after treatment of single-level cervical disk disease with the Bryan Cervical Disc","volume":"67","author":"Walraevens J","year":"2010","unstructured":"Walraevens J, Demaerel P, Suetens P,  Longitudinal prospective long-term radiographic follow-up after treatment of single-level cervical disk disease with the Bryan Cervical Disc. Neurosurgery. 2010;67(3):679\u2013687.10.1227\/01.NEU.0000377039.89725.F3"},{"issue":"22","key":"b3","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1543","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000002665","article-title":"The seven-year cost-effectiveness of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus cervical disc arthroplasty: a Markov analysis","volume":"43","author":"Kim JS","year":"2018","unstructured":"Kim JS, Dowdell J, Cheung ZB,  The seven-year cost-effectiveness of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus cervical disc arthroplasty: a Markov analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018;43(22):1543\u20131551.10.1097\/BRS.0000000000002665"},{"issue":"1","key":"b4","series-title":"Spine J","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"63","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.06.036","article-title":"The 5-year cost-effectiveness of two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion or cervical disc replacement: a Markov analysis","volume":"18","author":"Overley SC","year":"2018","unstructured":"Overley SC, McAnany SJ, Brochin RL, Kim JS, Merrill RK, Qureshi SA. The 5-year cost-effectiveness of two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion or cervical disc replacement: a Markov analysis. Spine J. 2018;18(1):63\u201371.10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.06.036"},{"issue":"4","key":"b5","series-title":"J Neurosurg Spine","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"516","DOI":"10.3171\/2014.6.SPINE13996","article-title":"Clinical and radiographic analysis of an artificial cervical disc: 7-year follow-up from the Prestige prospective randomized controlled clinical trial: clinical article","volume":"21","author":"Burkus JK","year":"2014","unstructured":"Burkus JK, Traynelis VC, Haid RW Jr, Mummaneni PV. Clinical and radiographic analysis of an artificial cervical disc: 7-year follow-up from the Prestige prospective randomized controlled clinical trial: clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine. 2014;21(4):516\u2013528.10.3171\/2014.6.SPINE13996"},{"issue":"3","key":"b6","series-title":"J Neurosurg Spine","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"252","DOI":"10.3171\/2017.5.SPINE16824","article-title":"Prospective, randomized multicenter study of cervical arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: 5-year results with a metal-on-metal artificial disc","volume":"28","author":"Coric D","year":"2018","unstructured":"Coric D, Guyer RD, Nunley PD,  Prospective, randomized multicenter study of cervical arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: 5-year results with a metal-on-metal artificial disc. J Neurosurg Spine. 2018;28(3):252\u2013261.10.3171\/2017.5.SPINE16824"},{"issue":"8","key":"b7","series-title":"PLoS One","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e0183603","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0183603","article-title":"What\u2019s the best surgical treatment for patients with cervical radiculopathy due to single-level degenerative disease? A randomized controlled trial","volume":"12","author":"Donk RD","year":"2017","unstructured":"Donk RD, Verbeek ALM, Verhagen WIM, Groenewoud H, Hosman AJF, Bartels RHMA. What\u2019s the best surgical treatment for patients with cervical radiculopathy due to single-level degenerative disease? A randomized controlled trial. PLoS One. 2017;12(8):e0183603.10.1371\/journal.pone.0183603"},{"issue":"6","key":"b8","series-title":"Bone Joint J","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"829","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.98B6.36381","article-title":"Effectiveness and safety of Mobi-C for treatment of single-level cervical disc spondylosis: a randomised control trial with a minimum of five years of follow-up","volume":"98-B","author":"Hou Y","year":"2016","unstructured":"Hou Y, Nie L, Pan X,  Effectiveness and safety of Mobi-C for treatment of single-level cervical disc spondylosis: a randomised control trial with a minimum of five years of follow-up. Bone Joint J. 2016;98-B(6):829\u2013833.10.1302\/0301-620X.98B6.36381"},{"issue":"21","key":"b9","series-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1738","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.N.01186","article-title":"ProDisc-C total disc replacement versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for single-level symptomatic cervical disc disease: seven-year follow-up of the prospective randomized U.S. Food and Drug Administration Investigational Device Exemption Study","volume":"97","author":"Janssen ME","year":"2015","unstructured":"Janssen ME, Zigler JE, Spivak JM, Delamarter RB, Darden BV 2nd, Kopjar B. ProDisc-C total disc replacement versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for single-level symptomatic cervical disc disease: seven-year follow-up of the prospective randomized U.S. Food and Drug Administration Investigational Device Exemption Study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015;97(21):1738\u20131747.10.2106\/JBJS.N.01186"},{"issue":"9","key":"b10","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"601","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000002907","article-title":"Ten-year outcomes of cervical disc replacement with the BRYAN Cervical Disc: results from a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial","volume":"44","author":"Lavelle WF","year":"2019","unstructured":"Lavelle WF, Riew KD, Levi AD, Florman JE. Ten-year outcomes of cervical disc replacement with the BRYAN Cervical Disc: results from a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019;44(9):601\u2013608.10.1097\/BRS.0000000000002907"},{"issue":"10","key":"b11","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"674","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000000869","article-title":"Long-term Outcomes of the US FDA IDE prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial Comparing PCM Cervical Disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion","volume":"40","author":"Phillips FM","year":"2015","unstructured":"Phillips FM, Geisler FH, Gilder KM, Reah C, Howell KM, McAfee PC. Long-term Outcomes of the US FDA IDE prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial Comparing PCM Cervical Disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015;40(10):674\u2013683.10.1097\/BRS.0000000000000869"},{"issue":"3","key":"b12","series-title":"Int J Spine Surg","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"377","DOI":"10.14444\/5044","article-title":"Long-term clinical experience with selectively constrained SECURE-C Cervical Artificial Disc for 1-level cervical disc disease: results from seven-year follow-up of a prospective, randomized, controlled investigational device exemption clinical trial","volume":"12","author":"Vaccaro A","year":"2018","unstructured":"Vaccaro A, Beutler W, Peppelman W,  Long-term clinical experience with selectively constrained SECURE-C Cervical Artificial Disc for 1-level cervical disc disease: results from seven-year follow-up of a prospective, randomized, controlled investigational device exemption clinical trial. Int J Spine Surg. 2018;12(3):377\u2013387.10.14444\/5044"},{"issue":"4","key":"b13","series-title":"J Neurosurg Spine","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"508","DOI":"10.3171\/2019.4.SPINE19157","article-title":"Two-level cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: 10-year outcomes of a prospective, randomized investigational device exemption clinical trial","volume":"31","author":"Gornet MF","year":"2019","unstructured":"Gornet MF, Lanman TH, Burkus JK,  Two-level cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: 10-year outcomes of a prospective, randomized investigational device exemption clinical trial. J Neurosurg Spine. 2019;31(4):508\u2013518.10.3171\/2019.4.SPINE19157"},{"issue":"3","key":"b14","series-title":"J Neurosurg Spine","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"323","DOI":"10.3171\/2018.9.SPINE18659","article-title":"Artificial disc replacement versus fusion in patients with cervical degenerative disc disease and radiculopathy: a randomized controlled trial with 5-year outcomes","volume":"30","author":"MacDowall A","year":"2019","unstructured":"MacDowall A, Canto Moreira N, Marques C,  Artificial disc replacement versus fusion in patients with cervical degenerative disc disease and radiculopathy: a randomized controlled trial with 5-year outcomes. J Neurosurg Spine. 2019;30(3):323\u2013331.10.3171\/2018.9.SPINE18659"},{"issue":"4","key":"b15","series-title":"Int J Spine Surg","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"31","DOI":"10.14444\/4031","article-title":"Long-term evaluation of cervical disc arthroplasty with the Mobi-C\u00a9 Cervical Disc: a randomized, prospective, multicenter clinical trial with seven-year follow-up","volume":"11","author":"Radcliff K","year":"2017","unstructured":"Radcliff K, Davis RJ, Hisey MS,  Long-term evaluation of cervical disc arthroplasty with the Mobi-C\u00a9 Cervical Disc: a randomized, prospective, multicenter clinical trial with seven-year follow-up. Int J Spine Surg. 2017;11(4):31.10.14444\/4031"},{"issue":"11","key":"b16","series-title":"Eur Spine J","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2688","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-020-06400-z","article-title":"Complications of cervical total disc replacement and their associations with heterotopic ossification: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"29","author":"Hui N","year":"2020","unstructured":"Hui N, Phan K, Cheng HMK, Lin YH, Mobbs RJ. Complications of cervical total disc replacement and their associations with heterotopic ossification: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Spine J. 2020;29(11):2688\u20132700.10.1007\/s00586-020-06400-z"},{"issue":"6","key":"b17","series-title":"Global Spine J","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"790","DOI":"10.1177\/2192568219881163","article-title":"Prevalence of and risk factors for heterotopic ossification after cervical total disc replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"10","author":"Hui N","year":"2020","unstructured":"Hui N, Phan K, Kerferd J, Lee M, Mobbs RJ. Prevalence of and risk factors for heterotopic ossification after cervical total disc replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Global Spine J. 2020;10(6):790\u2013804.10.1177\/2192568219881163"},{"issue":"6","key":"b18","series-title":"Neurosurgery","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1087","DOI":"10.1093\/neuros\/nyx579","article-title":"Cervical disc arthroplasty: current evidence and real-world application","volume":"83","author":"Nunley PD","year":"2018","unstructured":"Nunley PD, Coric D, Frank KA, Stone MB. Cervical disc arthroplasty: current evidence and real-world application. Neurosurgery. 2018;83(6):1087\u20131106.10.1093\/neuros\/nyx579"},{"issue":"2","key":"b19","series-title":"Neurosurg Focus","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E2","DOI":"10.3171\/2016.11.FOCUS16414","article-title":"Cervical arthroplasty: what does the labeling say?","volume":"42","author":"Turel MK","year":"2017","unstructured":"Turel MK, Kerolus MG, Adogwa O, Traynelis VC. Cervical arthroplasty: what does the labeling say? Neurosurg Focus. 2017;42(2):E2.10.3171\/2016.11.FOCUS16414"},{"key":"b20","series-title":"World Neurosurg","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"598","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2019.10.032","article-title":"Artificial discs in cervical disc replacement: a meta-analysis for comparison of long-term outcomes","volume":"134","author":"Wahood W","year":"2020","unstructured":"Wahood W, Yolcu YU, Kerezoudis P,  Artificial discs in cervical disc replacement: a meta-analysis for comparison of long-term outcomes. World Neurosurg. 2020;134:598\u2013613.e5.10.1016\/j.wneu.2019.10.032"},{"key":"b21","article-title":"M6-C Artificial Cervical Disc","unstructured":"Food and Drug Administration. M6-C Artificial Cervical Disc. Instructions for Use. Important Medical Information. Accessed December 7, 2021. https:\/\/www.accessdata.fda.gov\/cdrh_docs\/pdf17\/P170036D.pdf."},{"key":"b22","series-title":"Int J Spine Surg","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"71","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijsp.2012.02.001","article-title":"Cervical total disc replacement using a novel compressible prosthesis: Results from a prospective Food and Drug Administration-regulated feasibility study with 24-month follow-up","volume":"6","author":"Lauryssen C","year":"2012","unstructured":"Lauryssen C, Coric D, Dimmig T, Musante D, Ohnmeiss DD, Stubbs HA. Cervical total disc replacement using a novel compressible prosthesis: Results from a prospective Food and Drug Administration-regulated feasibility study with 24-month follow-up. Int J Spine Surg. 2012;6:71\u201377.10.1016\/j.ijsp.2012.02.001"},{"issue":"4","key":"b23","series-title":"Clin Spine Surg","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E182","DOI":"10.1097\/BSD.0000000000000025","article-title":"The M6-C Cervical Disk prosthesis: first clinical experience in 33 patients","volume":"29","author":"Thomas S","year":"2016","unstructured":"Thomas S, Willems K, Van den Daelen L, Linden P, Ciocci MC, Bocher P. The M6-C Cervical Disk prosthesis: first clinical experience in 33 patients. Clin Spine Surg. 2016;29(4):E182\u2013E187.10.1097\/BSD.0000000000000025"},{"issue":"4","key":"b24","series-title":"J Spine Surg","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"584","DOI":"10.21037\/jss.2019.11.06","article-title":"M6-C cervical disc replacement failure associated with late onset infection","volume":"5","author":"Xia MM","year":"2019","unstructured":"Xia MM, Winder MJ. M6-C cervical disc replacement failure associated with late onset infection. J Spine Surg. 2019;5(4):584\u2013588.10.21037\/jss.2019.11.06"},{"key":"b25","series-title":"Eur Spine J","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S536","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-014-3677-0","article-title":"Core herniation after implantation of a cervical artificial disc: case report","volume":"24","author":"Brenke C","year":"2015","unstructured":"Brenke C, Schmieder K, Barth M. Core herniation after implantation of a cervical artificial disc: case report. Eur Spine J. 2015;24(suppl 4):S536\u2013S539.10.1007\/s00586-014-3677-0"},{"issue":"11","key":"b26","series-title":"Eur Spine J","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2713","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-019-06064-4","article-title":"Prosthesis design influences segmental contribution to total cervical motion after cervical disc arthroplasty","volume":"29","author":"Patwardhan AG","year":"2020","unstructured":"Patwardhan AG, Havey RM. Prosthesis design influences segmental contribution to total cervical motion after cervical disc arthroplasty. Eur Spine J. 2020;29(11):2713\u20132721.10.1007\/s00586-019-06064-4"}],"container-title":["Journal of Neurosurgery: Case Lessons"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/thejns.org\/view\/journals\/j-neurosurg-case-lessons\/3\/11\/article-CASE21731.xml","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/thejns.org\/downloadpdf\/journals\/j-neurosurg-case-lessons\/3\/11\/article-CASE21731.xml","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"syndication"},{"URL":"https:\/\/thejns.org\/downloadpdf\/journals\/j-neurosurg-case-lessons\/3\/11\/article-CASE21731.xml","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,5]],"date-time":"2026-02-05T14:45:04Z","timestamp":1770302704000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/thejns.org\/view\/journals\/j-neurosurg-case-lessons\/3\/11\/article-CASE21731.xml"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,3,14]]},"references-count":52,"journal-issue":{"issue":"11"},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3171\/case21731","relation":{},"ISSN":["2694-1902"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2694-1902","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,3,14]]}}}