{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,13]],"date-time":"2026-10-13T12:05:30Z","timestamp":1791893130287,"version":"4.3.4"},"reference-count":12,"publisher":"Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG)","issue":"6","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["PED"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2008,6]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n<jats:title>Object<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>Tapping of a suspected malfunctioning ventriculoperitoneal shunt is usually easy, sometimes informative, but also potentially misleading. The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of a shunt evaluation protocol that does not involve direct shunt tapping except in rare and specific cases.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>\n<jats:sec>\n<jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>The authors adopted a protocol for shunt evaluation that involves shunt tapping only in selected cases of suspected infection or in patients with noncommunicating hydrocephalus and equivocal computed tomography (CT) findings of shunt infection. They then reviewed the clinical characteristics and surgical findings in 373 consecutive assessments of 155 pediatric patients who were evaluated for shunt malfunction and\/or infection by using this protocol between January 2003 and December 2005.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>\n<jats:sec>\n<jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>Mental status change and headache were the symptoms most concordant with shunt malfunction, but no symptom had a predictive value much better than 50%. Follow-up CT scans demonstrated enlarged ventricles in 72 of 126 cases of shunt revision. Among those with obstruction but without remarkable CT changes, 8 patients had evidence of distal obstruction on x-ray \u201cshunt series\u201d consisting of skull, chest, and abdominal radiographs, and 5 had obvious symptoms that rendered further testing unnecessary; 38 cases of obstruction were diagnosed based on elevated opening pressure on lumbar puncture (mean 34.7 cm H<jats:sub>2<\/jats:sub>O). A shunt tap was required in only 8 cases (2%).<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>\n<jats:sec>\n<jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>The authors have shown that it is possible to evaluate the majority of ventricular shunt malfunctions without tapping the device. Because it is possible to diagnose shunt obstruction correctly by other means, the shunt tap may not be obligatory as a routine test of the device's patency.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.3171\/ped\/2008\/1\/6\/435","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2008,6,2]],"date-time":"2008-06-02T15:57:24Z","timestamp":1212422244000},"page":"435-438","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":20,"title":["Rethinking the indications for the ventriculoperitoneal shunt tap"],"prefix":"10.3171","volume":"1","author":[{"given":"Jonathan P.","family":"Miller","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Steven C.","family":"Fulop","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Shervin R.","family":"Dashti","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Shenandoah","family":"Robinson","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Alan R.","family":"Cohen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1754","reference":[{"key":"b1-0010435","series-title":"Arch Dis Child","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"198","DOI":"10.1136\/adc.87.3.198","article-title":"Ventriculoperitoneal shunt block: what are the best predictive clinical indicators?","volume":"87","author":"Barnes","year":"2002"},{"key":"b2-0010435","series-title":"J Neurosurg","first-page":"215","article-title":"Control of hydrocephalus by valve-regulated venous shunt: avoidance of complications in prolonged shunt maintenance","volume":"68","author":"Becker","year":"1968"},{"key":"b3-0010435","series-title":"J Neurosurg","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"875","DOI":"10.3171\/jns.1992.77.6.0875","article-title":"Shunt implantation: reducing the incidence of shunt infection","volume":"77","author":"Choux","year":"1992"},{"key":"b4-0010435","series-title":"J Neurosurg","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"817","DOI":"10.3171\/jns.1988.68.5.0817","article-title":"Management of proximal shunt obstruction. Technical note","volume":"68","author":"Duncan","year":"1988"},{"key":"b5-0010435","series-title":"J Neurosurg","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"195","DOI":"10.3171\/jns.2001.94.2.0195","article-title":"Cerebrospinal fluid shunt infection: a prospective study of risk factors","volume":"94","author":"Kulkarni","year":"2001"},{"key":"b6-0010435","series-title":"Infect Dis Clin North Am","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"735","DOI":"10.1016\/S0891-5520(05)70103-3","article-title":"Nosocomial bacterial meningitis, including central nervous system shunt infections","volume":"13","author":"Morris","year":"1999"},{"key":"b7-0010435","series-title":"J Neurosurg","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"328","DOI":"10.3171\/jns.1984.61.2.0328","article-title":"Shunt fluid examination: risks and benefits in the evaluation of shunt malfunction and infection","volume":"61","author":"Noetzel","year":"1984"},{"key":"b8-0010435","series-title":"Neurosurgery","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"139","DOI":"10.1227\/01.NEU.0000146206.40375.41","article-title":"Implanted ventricular shunts in the United States: the billion-dollar-a-year cost of hydrocephalus treatment","volume":"56","author":"Patwardhan","year":"2005"},{"key":"b9-0010435","series-title":"Surg Neurol","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"15","DOI":"10.1016\/S0090-3019(81)80084-5","article-title":"The surgical treatment of hydrocephalus\u2014an historical review","volume":"15","author":"Pudenz","year":"1981"},{"key":"b10-0010435","series-title":"Pediatr Emerg Care","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E1","DOI":"10.1097\/00006565-200208000-00001","article-title":"Comparison of ventriculoperitoneal shunt tap and lumbar puncture in a child with meningitis","volume":"18","author":"Scribano","year":"2002"},{"key":"b11-0010435","series-title":"J Neurosci Nurs","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"155","DOI":"10.1097\/01376517-199606000-00003","article-title":"Shunt infections in children: presentation and management","volume":"28","author":"Williams","year":"1996"},{"key":"b12-0010435","series-title":"Pediatr Neurosurg","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"151","DOI":"10.1159\/000091857","article-title":"CSF shunt failure with stable normal ventricular size","volume":"42","author":"Winston","year":"2006"}],"container-title":["Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/thejns.org\/view\/journals\/j-neurosurg-pediatr\/1\/6\/article-p435.xml","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/thejns.org\/downloadpdf\/journals\/j-neurosurg-pediatr\/1\/6\/article-p435.xml","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"syndication"},{"URL":"https:\/\/thejns.org\/downloadpdf\/journals\/j-neurosurg-pediatr\/1\/6\/article-p435.xml","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,4,15]],"date-time":"2023-04-15T14:38:32Z","timestamp":1681569512000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/thejns.org\/view\/journals\/j-neurosurg-pediatr\/1\/6\/article-p435.xml"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2008,6]]},"references-count":12,"journal-issue":{"issue":"6"},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3171\/ped\/2008\/1\/6\/435","relation":{},"ISSN":["1933-0707","1933-0715"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1933-0707","type":"print"},{"value":"1933-0715","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2008,6]]}}}