{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,6]],"date-time":"2026-02-06T23:30:54Z","timestamp":1770420654141,"version":"3.49.0"},"reference-count":0,"publisher":"Vittorio Klostermann GMBH","issue":"2","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["ZfBB"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2012]]},"abstract":"<p>In diesem Beitrag werden am Beispiel von Onkologie- und Pharmaziezeitschriften Unterschiede zwischen und Gemeinsamkeiten von Downloads und Zitaten herausgearbeitet. Die Download-Daten wurden von Elsevier (ScienceDirect) bereitgestellt, die Zitationsdaten wurden den Journal Citation Reports entnommen bzw. aus dem Web of Science recherchiert. Die Ergebnisse zeigen einen hohen Zusammenhang zwischen Download- und Zitationsh\u00e4ufigkeiten, der f\u00fcr die relativen Zeitschriftenindikatoren und auf Artikelebene etwas geringer ist. Deutliche Unterschiede bestehen hingegen zwischen den Altersstrukturen der heruntergeladenen und der zitierten Artikel. Elektronische Zeitschriften haben ma\u00dfgeblich dazu beigetragen, dass aktuelle Literatur fr\u00fcher aufgegriffen und deutlich \u00f6fter zitiert wird, im Schnitt hat sich das Alter der zitierten Literatur in den letzten zehn Jahren aber kaum ver\u00e4ndert. \n\nThis article deals with the differences between and commonalities to be found in regard to downloads and citations of oncologyand pharmaceutical journals. Download data was supplied by Elsevier (ScienceDirect), while citation data was taken from \u00bbJournal Citation Reports\u00ab or searched with help of \u00bbWeb of Science\u00ab. The results show a high correlation between frequencies of downloads and of citations, although it is somewhat lower for relative journal indicators and in reference to individual articles. Significant differences exist, however, between the age of downloaded and cited articles. Electronic journals have clearly been responsible for current literature being referenced earlier and significantly more often. On the average, however, the age of literature being cited has hardly changed in the past ten years.<\/p>","DOI":"10.3196\/186429501259230","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2013,10,16]],"date-time":"2013-10-16T06:31:18Z","timestamp":1381905078000},"page":"087-095","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Sind Downloads die besseren Zeitschriftennutzungsdaten?\nEin Vergleich von Download und Zitationsindikatoren"],"prefix":"10.3196","volume":"59","author":[{"given":"Christian","family":"Schl\u00f6gl","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Juan","family":"Gorraiz","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"1809","container-title":["Zeitschrift f\u00fcr Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie"],"original-title":[],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,6]],"date-time":"2026-02-06T11:55:36Z","timestamp":1770378936000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.inlibra.com\/index.php?doi=10.3196\/186429501259230"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2012]]},"references-count":0,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2012]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3196\/186429501259230","relation":{},"ISSN":["1864-2950"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1864-2950","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2012]]}}}