{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,16]],"date-time":"2025-12-16T12:29:52Z","timestamp":1765888192156,"version":"3.41.2"},"reference-count":18,"publisher":"Siapec Servizi Srl","issue":"1","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Pathologica"],"DOI":"10.32074\/1591-951x-64-18","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2019,8,8]],"date-time":"2019-08-08T06:21:43Z","timestamp":1565245303000},"page":"31-36","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["Comparative analysis of margin status in breast conservation surgery and its correlation with subsequent re-excision findings"],"prefix":"10.32074","volume":"111","author":[{"given":"K.","family":"Krishnamurthy","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"C. A.","family":"Febres-Aldana","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"S.","family":"Alghamdi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"T.","family":"Mesko","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"J.","family":"Paramo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"R. J.","family":"Poppiti","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"21774","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2019,3]]},"reference":[{"key":"10.32074\/1591-951X-64-18_ref1","unstructured":"Cancer statistics review 1975-2015. Available at: https:\/\/seer.cancer.gov\/statfacts\/html\/common.html [Accessed 2 Jul. 2018]."},{"key":"10.32074\/1591-951X-64-18_ref2","unstructured":"Fisher ER, Anderson S, Redmond C, et al. Ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence and survival following lumpectomy and irradiation: pathological findings from NSABP protocol B-06. Semin Surg Oncol 1992;8:161-6."},{"key":"10.32074\/1591-951X-64-18_ref3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2002;347:1233-41.","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa022152"},{"key":"10.32074\/1591-951X-64-18_ref4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Veronesi U, Cascinelli N, Mariani L, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2002;347:1227-32.","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa020989"},{"key":"10.32074\/1591-951X-64-18_ref5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Cady B, Stone MD, Shuler JG, et al. The new era in breast cancer. Invasion, size, and nodal involvement dramatically decreasing as a result of mammographic screening. Arch Surg 1996;131:301.","DOI":"10.1001\/archsurg.1996.01430150079015"},{"key":"10.32074\/1591-951X-64-18_ref6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Schnitt SJ. Risk factors for local recurrence in patients with invasive breast cancer and negative surgical margins of excision. Where are we and where are we going? Am J Clin Pathol 2003;120:485-8.","DOI":"10.1309\/9AFHAWNK81TFWGB0"},{"key":"10.32074\/1591-951X-64-18_ref7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sanchez C, Brem R F, McSwain AP, et al. Factors associated with re-excision in patients with earlystage breast cancer treated with breast conservation therapy. Am Surg 2010;76:331-4.","DOI":"10.1177\/000313481007600319"},{"key":"10.32074\/1591-951X-64-18_ref8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Moran MS, Schnitt SJ, Giuliano AE, et al. Society of Surgical Oncology-American Society for Radiation Oncology consensus guideline on margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation in stages I and II invasive breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2014;21:704.","DOI":"10.1245\/s10434-014-3481-4"},{"key":"10.32074\/1591-951X-64-18_ref9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Moran MS, Schnitt SJ, Giuliano AE, et al. Society of Surgical Oncology-American Society for Radiation Oncology consensus guideline on margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation in stages I and II invasive breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2014;88:553-64.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijrobp.2013.11.012"},{"key":"10.32074\/1591-951X-64-18_ref10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Morrow M, Van Zee KJ, Solin LJ, et al. Society of Surgical Oncology-American Society for Radiation Oncology-American Society of Clinical Oncology Consensus Guideline on Margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation in ductal carcinoma in situ. Ann Surg Oncol 2016;23:3801-10.","DOI":"10.1245\/s10434-016-5449-z"},{"key":"10.32074\/1591-951X-64-18_ref11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Guidi AJ, Connolly JL, Harris JR, et al. The relationship between shaved margin and inked margin status in breast excision specimens. Cancer 1997;79:1568-73.","DOI":"10.1002\/(SICI)1097-0142(19970415)79:8<1568::AID-CNCR19>3.0.CO;2-W"},{"key":"10.32074\/1591-951X-64-18_ref12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Guidi AJ, Tworek JA, Mais DD, et al. Breast specimen processing and reporting with an emphasis on margin evaluation: a college of american pathologists survey of 866 laboratories. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2018;142:496-506.","DOI":"10.5858\/arpa.2016-0626-CP"},{"key":"10.32074\/1591-951X-64-18_ref13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Chiappa C, Rovera F, Corbenc AD, et al. Surgical margins in breast conservation. Int J Surg 2013;11:S69-72.","DOI":"10.1016\/S1743-9191(13)60021-7"},{"key":"10.32074\/1591-951X-64-18_ref14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Moo TA, Choi L, Culpepper C, et al. Impact of margin assessment method on positive margin rate and total volume excised. Ann Surg Oncol 2014;21:86-92.","DOI":"10.1245\/s10434-013-3257-2"},{"key":"10.32074\/1591-951X-64-18_ref15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Murphy BL, Boughey JC, Keeney MG, et al. Factors associated with positive margins in women undergoing breast conservation surgery. Mayo Clin Proc 2018;93:429-35.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.mayocp.2017.11.023"},{"key":"10.32074\/1591-951X-64-18_ref16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Findlay-Shirras LJ, Outbih O, Muzyka CN, et al. Predictors of residual disease after breast conservation surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 2018;25:1936-42.","DOI":"10.1245\/s10434-018-6454-1"},{"key":"10.32074\/1591-951X-64-18_ref17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sigal-Zafrani B, Lewis JS, Clough KB, et al. Histological margin assessment for breast ductal carcinoma in situ: precision and implications. Mod Pathol 2004;17:81-8.","DOI":"10.1038\/modpathol.3800019"},{"key":"10.32074\/1591-951X-64-18_ref18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Neuschatz AC, DiPetrillo T, Steinhoff M, et al. The value of breast lumpectomy margin assessment as a predictor of residual tumor burden in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Cancer 2002;94:1917-24.","DOI":"10.1002\/cncr.10460"}],"container-title":["Pathologica"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/www.pathologica.it\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/06_krishnamurthy.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,11,5]],"date-time":"2024-11-05T13:26:47Z","timestamp":1730813207000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/old.pathologica.it\/article\/view\/11"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2019,3]]},"references-count":18,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2019,3]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.32074\/1591-951x-64-18","relation":{},"ISSN":["1591-951X"],"issn-type":[{"type":"electronic","value":"1591-951X"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2019,3]]},"article-number":"6"}}