{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,30]],"date-time":"2025-05-30T20:05:08Z","timestamp":1748635508578,"version":"3.37.3"},"reference-count":0,"publisher":"IOS Press","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2008]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>This paper analyzes the representation of legal knowledge, and of Intellectual Property (or IP) law in particular. This is done by looking at two ways of representing the IP domain: through an IP ontology and by way of rule representation. And although these two solutions differ in many respects, they share the conceptual problems specific to this domain. This paper is based on research conducted under the EU-funded project ALIS (IST-2004-2.4.9).<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.3233\/978-1-58603-952-3-98","type":"book-chapter","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,21]],"date-time":"2025-02-21T10:26:53Z","timestamp":1740133613000},"source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Legal Knowledge Representation: A Twofold Experience in the Domain of Intellectual Property Law"],"prefix":"10.3233","author":[{"family":"Contissa Giuseppe","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"family":"Laukyte Migle","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"7437","container-title":["Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications","Legal Knowledge and Information Systems"],"original-title":[],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,21]],"date-time":"2025-02-21T11:19:03Z","timestamp":1740136743000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.medra.org\/servlet\/aliasResolver?alias=iospressISSNISBN&issn=0922-6389&volume=189&spage=98"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2008]]},"references-count":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3233\/978-1-58603-952-3-98","relation":{},"ISSN":["0922-6389"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0922-6389","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2008]]}}}