{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,22]],"date-time":"2025-02-22T05:34:23Z","timestamp":1740202463220,"version":"3.37.3"},"reference-count":0,"publisher":"IOS Press","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2010]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>Background: To improve the quality of reports of health informatics evaluations we recently devised and published a guideline named STARE-HI, now formally endorsed by IMIA. Objective: To develop a prioritization framework of ranked items (a mini-STARE-HI) to assist authors when reporting health informatics evaluation studies in a restricted space conference paper. Method: We invited 111 editors of health informatics conference proceedings and reviewers and authors of health informatics evaluation studies to score 106 reporting items on a scale ranging from &amp;ldquo;0 - not necessary&amp;rdquo; through to &amp;ldquo;10 - essential&amp;rdquo; by a web-based survey. Results: The response rate for the survey was 63% (70 out of 111). The most important items (score &amp;gt;9) were &amp;ldquo;Interpret the data and give an answer to the study question&amp;rdquo;, &amp;ldquo;Whether it is a laboratory, simulation or field study&amp;rdquo; and &amp;ldquo;Description of the outcome measure\/evaluation criteria&amp;rdquo;. Four items had a mean score &amp;lt;6. Conclusion: It has been possible to produce a ranking of reporting items from STARE-HI according to their prioritized relevance for inclusion in space-limited conference papers. We believe that this prioritization framework can improve quality and utility of conference papers on health informatics evaluation studies.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.3233\/978-1-60750-588-4-1206","type":"book-chapter","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,21]],"date-time":"2025-02-21T15:10:01Z","timestamp":1740150601000},"source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Mini Stare-HI: Guidelines for reporting health informatics evaluations in conference papers"],"prefix":"10.3233","author":[{"family":"de Keizer Nicolette F.","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"family":"Talmon Jan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"family":"Ammenwerth Elske","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"family":"Brender Jytte","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"family":"Nykanen Pirkko","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"family":"Rigby Michael","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"7437","container-title":["Studies in Health Technology and Informatics","MEDINFO 2010"],"original-title":[],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,21]],"date-time":"2025-02-21T15:18:31Z","timestamp":1740151111000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.medra.org\/servlet\/aliasResolver?alias=iospressISSNISBN&issn=0926-9630&volume=160&spage=1206"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2010]]},"references-count":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3233\/978-1-60750-588-4-1206","relation":{},"ISSN":["0926-9630"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0926-9630","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2010]]}}}