{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,22]],"date-time":"2025-02-22T05:28:10Z","timestamp":1740202090580,"version":"3.37.3"},"reference-count":0,"publisher":"IOS Press","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2010]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>Recently Argumentation Mechanism Design (ArgMD) was introduced as a paradigm for studying argumentation using game-theoretic techniques. To date, this framework has been used to study under what conditions a direct mechanism based on Dung's grounded semantics is strategy-proof (i.e. truth-enforcing) when knowledge of arguments is private to self-interested agents. In this paper, we study Dung's preferred semantics in order to understand under what conditions it is possible to design strategy-proof mechanisms. This is challenging since, unlike with the grounded semantics, there may be multiple preferred extensions, forcing a mechanism to select one. We show that this gives rise to interesting strategic behaviour, and we show that in general it is not possible to have a strategy-proof mechanism that selects amongst the preferred extensions in a non-biased manner. We also investigaet refinements of preferred semantics which induce unique outcomes, namely the skeptical-preferred and ideal semantics.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.3233\/978-1-60750-619-5-403","type":"book-chapter","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,21]],"date-time":"2025-02-21T10:21:00Z","timestamp":1740133260000},"source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Argumentation Mechanism Design for Preferred Semantics"],"prefix":"10.3233","author":[{"family":"Pan Shengying","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"family":"Larson Kate","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"family":"Rahwan Iyad","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"7437","container-title":["Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications","Computational Models of Argument"],"original-title":[],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,21]],"date-time":"2025-02-21T11:35:06Z","timestamp":1740137706000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.medra.org\/servlet\/aliasResolver?alias=iospressISSNISBN&issn=0922-6389&volume=216&spage=403"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2010]]},"references-count":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3233\/978-1-60750-619-5-403","relation":{},"ISSN":["0922-6389"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0922-6389","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2010]]}}}