{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,29]],"date-time":"2026-04-29T03:47:20Z","timestamp":1777434440670,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":18,"publisher":"SAGE Publications","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2016,5,12]],"date-time":"2016-05-12T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1463011200000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["journals.sagepub.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Argument &amp; Computation"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,7,5]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>\n                    This paper is to critically examines Pollock\u2019s critical-link semantics with variable degrees of justification. Some possibly counterintuitive consequences of Pollock\u2019s definition of degrees of justification are identified and a modified definition is proposed which avoids these consequences. Then the new solution is applied to the case of so-called presumptive defeat. A second contribution of the paper is to show how the modified semantics can be applied to the ASPIC\n                    <jats:sup>+<\/jats:sup>\n                    framework: first the ASPIC\n                    <jats:sup>+<\/jats:sup>\n                    framework is modified to allow for variable degrees of justification and then the modified way to compute these degrees is applied in a new notion of an argument graph.\n                  <\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.3233\/aac-160003","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2019,11,9]],"date-time":"2019-11-09T17:19:50Z","timestamp":1573319990000},"page":"35-53","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/sage-journals-update-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["An analysis of critical-link semantics with variable degrees of justification"],"prefix":"10.1177","volume":"7","author":[{"given":"Bin","family":"Wei","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"School of Administrative Law, Southwest University of Political Science and Law, Chongqing, China"}]},{"given":"Henry","family":"Prakken","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Information and Computing Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands"},{"name":"Faculty of Law, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands"}]}],"member":"179","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2016,5,12]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref001","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-540-45062-7_36"},{"key":"ref002","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0004-3702(94)00041-X"},{"key":"ref003","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2007.05.003"},{"key":"ref004","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/S1471068403001674"},{"key":"ref005","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2007.04.010"},{"key":"ref006","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2010.12.003"},{"key":"ref007","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/logcom\/9.2.215"},{"key":"ref008","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0004-3702(91)90061-N"},{"key":"ref009","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2012.10.008"},{"key":"ref010","unstructured":"S.J.\u00a0Modgil and H.\u00a0Prakken, Revisiting preferences and argumentation, in: Proceedings of the 22nd International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2011), 2011, pp.\u00a01021\u20131026."},{"key":"ref011","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1207\/s15516709cog1104_4"},{"key":"ref012","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0004-3702(01)00145-X"},{"key":"ref013","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-0-387-98197-0_9"},{"key":"ref014","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/19462161003728921"},{"key":"ref015","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.7551\/mitpress\/1887.001.0001"},{"key":"ref016","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/19462160903564592"},{"key":"ref017","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/19462166.2012.661766"},{"key":"ref018","unstructured":"B.\u00a0van Gijzel and H.\u00a0Prakken, Relating Carneades with abstract argumentation, in: Proceedings of the 22nd International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2011), 2011, pp.\u00a01113\u20131119."}],"container-title":["Argument &amp; Computation"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.3233\/AAC-160003","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.3233\/AAC-160003","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.3233\/AAC-160003","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,28]],"date-time":"2026-04-28T11:53:45Z","timestamp":1777377225000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/10.3233\/AAC-160003"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2016,5,12]]},"references-count":18,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,7,5]]}},"alternative-id":["10.3233\/AAC-160003"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3233\/aac-160003","relation":{},"ISSN":["1946-2166","1946-2174"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1946-2166","type":"print"},{"value":"1946-2174","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2016,5,12]]}}}