{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,29]],"date-time":"2026-04-29T03:47:09Z","timestamp":1777434429211,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":37,"publisher":"SAGE Publications","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2018,6,29]],"date-time":"2018-06-29T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1530230400000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["journals.sagepub.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Argument &amp; Computation"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,7,16]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>The dominant approach to argument mining has been to treat it as a machine learning problem based upon superficial text features, and to treat the relationships between arguments as either support or attack. However, accurately summarizing argumentation in scientific research articles requires a deeper understanding of the text and a richer model of relationships between arguments. First, this paper presents an argumentation scheme-based approach to mining a class of biomedical research articles. Argumentation schemes implemented as logic programs are formulated in terms of semantic predicates that could be obtained from a text by use of biomedical\/biological natural language processing tools. The logic programs can be used to extract the underlying scheme name, premises, and implicit or explicit conclusion of an argument. Then this paper explores how arguments in a research article occur within a narrative of scientific discovery, how they are related to each other, and some implications.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.3233\/aac-180038","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2018,6,29]],"date-time":"2018-06-29T16:37:03Z","timestamp":1530290223000},"page":"121-135","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/sage-journals-update-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":20,"title":["Towards mining scientific discourse using argumentation schemes"],"prefix":"10.1177","volume":"9","author":[{"given":"Nancy L.","family":"Green","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"University of North Carolina Greensboro, Greensboro, NC 27402, USA. Tel.:\u00a0;\u00a0Fax:\u00a0;\u00a0E-mail:\u00a0"}]}],"member":"179","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2018,6,29]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref001","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"M.\u00a0Bada, M.\u00a0Eckert, D.\u00a0Evanset al., Concept annotation in the CRAFT corpus, BMC Bioinformatics13 (2012), 161.","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2105-13-161"},{"key":"ref002","unstructured":"I.\u00a0Bratko, Prolog Programming for Artificial Intelligence, 3rd edn, Addison-Wesley, Harlow, England, 2001."},{"key":"ref003","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/219717.219771"},{"key":"ref004","unstructured":"E.\u00a0Cabrio and S.\u00a0Villata, Generating abstract arguments: A natural language approach, in: Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2012, B.\u00a0Verheij, S.\u00a0Szeider and S.\u00a0Woltran, eds, IOS Press, Amsterdam, 2012, pp.\u00a0454\u2013461."},{"key":"ref005","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/bioinformatics\/btm235"},{"key":"ref006","unstructured":"C.\u00a0Cardieet al.\u00a0(eds), Second Workshop on Argumentation Mining. North American Conference of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Denver (CO), 2015."},{"key":"ref007","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/S1351324909990209"},{"key":"ref008","unstructured":"V.W.\u00a0Feng and G.\u00a0Hirst, Classifying arguments by scheme, in: Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Portland (OR), 2011, pp.\u00a0987\u2013996."},{"key":"ref009","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"N.\u00a0Green, Annotating evidence-based argumentation in biomedical text, in: Proceedings of the 2015 International Workshop on Biomedical and Health Informatics, IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM 2015), Washington (DC), Nov. 9\u201312, 2015, IEEE Computer Society Press, 2015.","DOI":"10.1109\/BIBM.2015.7359807"},{"key":"ref010","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s10503-009-9169-4"},{"key":"ref011","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"N.L.\u00a0Green, Identifying argumentation schemes in genetics research articles, in: Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Argumentation Mining, North American Conference of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Denver (CO), 2015.","DOI":"10.3115\/v1\/W15-0502"},{"key":"ref012","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"N.L.\u00a0Green, Manual identification of arguments with implicit conclusions using semantic rules for argument mining, in: Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Argument Mining, Empirical Models of Natural Language Processing (EMNLP 2017), Copenhagan, 2017.","DOI":"10.18653\/v1\/W17-5109"},{"key":"ref013","unstructured":"N.L.\u00a0Green, Implementing Argumentation Schemes as Logic Programs. In:\n                      Workshop on Computational Models of Natural Argument (CMNA 2016). International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence\n                      , New York. CEUR Workshop Vol-1876."},{"key":"ref014","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"N.L.\u00a0Greenet al.\u00a0(eds), First workshop on argumentation mining, in: Association for Computational Linguistics, Baltimore (MD), 2014. doi:10.3115\/v1\/W14-21.","DOI":"10.3115\/v1\/W14-21"},{"key":"ref015","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/2736282"},{"key":"ref016","unstructured":"M.\u00a0Jenicek and D.\u00a0Hitchcock, Logic and Critical Thinking in Medicine, American Medical Association Press, 2005."},{"key":"ref017","unstructured":"J.\u00a0Lawrence, F.\u00a0Bex, C.\u00a0Reed and M.\u00a0Snaith, AIFdb: Infrastructure for the argument web, in: Proc. of the Fourth International Conference on Computational Models of Argument (COMMA 2012), 2012, pp.\u00a0515\u2013516."},{"key":"ref018","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"J.\u00a0Lawrence and C.\u00a0Reed, Argument mining using argumentation scheme structures, in: Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2016, P.\u00a0Baroniet al., eds, IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp.\u00a0379\u2013390.","DOI":"10.3233\/978-1-61499-686-6-379"},{"key":"ref019","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"M.\u00a0Liakataet al., Automatic recognition of conceptualization zones in scientific articles and two life science applications, Bioinformatics28(7) (2012). doi:10.1093\/bioinformatics\/bts071.","DOI":"10.1093\/bioinformatics\/bts071"},{"key":"ref020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"A.S.\u00a0Mahmood, T.J.\u00a0Wu, R.\u00a0Mazumder and K.\u00a0Vijay-Shanker, DiMeX: A text mining system for mutation-disease association extraction, PLoS One (2016.","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0152725"},{"issue":"3","key":"ref021","first-page":"243","volume":"8","author":"Mann W.C.","journal-title":"Text"},{"key":"ref022","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"P.\u00a0McBurney and S.\u00a0Parsons, Chance discovery using dialectical argumentation, in: New Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, T.\u00a0Teranoet al., eds, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, v.2253, Springer Verlag, Berlin, 2001, pp.\u00a0414\u2013424. doi:10.1007\/3-540-45548-5_57.","DOI":"10.1007\/3-540-45548-5_57"},{"key":"ref023","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"C.\u00a0Mihaila, T.\u00a0Ohta, S.\u00a0Pyysalo and S.\u00a0Ananiadou, BioCause: Annotating and analysing causality in the biomedical domain, BMC Bioinformatics14 (2013), 2.","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2105-14-2"},{"key":"ref024","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijmedinf.2005.06.013"},{"key":"ref025","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-010-9104-x"},{"key":"ref026","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"N.\u00a0Naderi and W.\u00a0Witte, Automated extraction and semantic analysis of mutation impacts from the biomedical literature, BMC Genomics13(Suppl 4) (2012), 510.","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2164-13-S4-S10"},{"key":"ref027","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"A.\u00a0Peldszus and M.\u00a0Stede, Rhetorical structure and argumentation structure in monologue text, in: Proc. of the 3rd Workshop on Argumentation Mining, ACL, Berlin, 2016.","DOI":"10.18653\/v1\/W16-2812"},{"key":"ref028","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"R.\u00a0Prasad, S.\u00a0McRoy, N.\u00a0Frid, A.\u00a0Joshi and H.\u00a0Yu, The Biomedical Discourse Relation Bank, BMC Bioinformatics12 (2011), 188.","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2105-12-188"},{"key":"ref029","unstructured":"C.\u00a0Reedet al.\u00a0(eds), Third Workshop on Argumentation Mining, Association for Computational Linguistics, Berlin, 2016."},{"key":"ref030","unstructured":"C.\u00a0Reed, R.\u00a0Mochales-Palau, M.\u00a0Moens and D.\u00a0Milward, Language resources for studying argument, in: Proceedings of the 6th Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC2008), ELRA, pp.\u00a091\u2013100."},{"key":"ref031","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/19462166.2012.663539"},{"key":"ref032","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/bioinformatics\/bti475"},{"key":"ref033","unstructured":"C.\u00a0Stab and R.\u00a0Gurevych, Annotating argument components and relations in persuasive essays, in: Proceedings of COLING 2014, pp.\u00a01501\u20131510."},{"key":"ref034","unstructured":"S.\u00a0Teufel, The Structure of Scientific Articles: Applications to Citation Indexing and Summarization, CSLI Publications, Stanford, CA, 2010."},{"key":"ref035","first-page":"1076","volume":"108","author":"van de Leemput J.","year":"2007","journal-title":"PLoS Genetics"},{"key":"ref036","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2105-13-207"},{"key":"ref037","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511802034"}],"container-title":["Argument &amp; Computation"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.3233\/AAC-180038","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.3233\/AAC-180038","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.3233\/AAC-180038","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,28]],"date-time":"2026-04-28T11:53:52Z","timestamp":1777377232000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/10.3233\/AAC-180038"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2018,6,29]]},"references-count":37,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,7,16]]}},"alternative-id":["10.3233\/AAC-180038"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3233\/aac-180038","relation":{},"ISSN":["1946-2166","1946-2174"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1946-2166","type":"print"},{"value":"1946-2174","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2018,6,29]]}}}