{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,29]],"date-time":"2026-04-29T03:47:16Z","timestamp":1777434436246,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":23,"publisher":"SAGE Publications","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2018,10,26]],"date-time":"2018-10-26T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1540512000000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["journals.sagepub.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Argument &amp; Computation"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,11,12]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>Abstract dialectical frameworks have been proposed as a generalization of the abstract argumentation frameworks. The semantics of abstract dialectical frameworks is defined by identifying different classes of models. In this paper, we show that the semantics of abstract dialectical frameworks could naturally be defined based on simple notions of arguments and attacks like in abstract argumentation. This insight allows us to adapt directly the semantical concepts in abstract argumentation to abstract dialectical frameworks that not only capture the standard semantics of abstract dialectical frameworks, but also suggest other new semantics based on the idea of \u201crejection as assumption\u201d (raa) (similar to the concept of \u201cnegation as assumption\u201d in assumption-based argumentation and logic programming) like the well-founded semantics or the raa-preferential semantics.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.3233\/aac-180427","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2018,10,26]],"date-time":"2018-10-26T12:11:56Z","timestamp":1540555916000},"page":"249-267","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/sage-journals-update-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":6,"title":["Representing the semantics of abstract dialectical frameworks based on arguments and attacks"],"prefix":"10.1177","volume":"9","author":[{"given":"Phan Minh","family":"Dung","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Communication and Information Technology, Asian Institute of Technology, Thailand"}]},{"given":"Phan Minh","family":"Thang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Burapha University International College, Thailand"}]}],"member":"179","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2018,10,26]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref001","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1021603608656"},{"key":"ref002","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"P.\u00a0Baroni, F.\u00a0Cerutti, M.\u00a0Giacomin and G.\u00a0Guida, Encompassing attacks to attacks in abstract argumentation frameworks, in: ECSQARU, 2009, 2009, pp.\u00a083\u201394.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-02906-6_9"},{"key":"ref003","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"T.J.M.\u00a0Bench-Capon and K.\u00a0Atkinson, Abstract argumentation and values, in: Argumentation in AI, Springer Verlag, 2009.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-0-387-98197-0_3"},{"key":"ref004","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0004-3702(97)00015-5"},{"key":"ref005","unstructured":"G.\u00a0Brewka, P.E.\u00a0Dunne and S.\u00a0Woltran, Relating the semantics of abstract dialectical framework and standard AFs, in: Proc. IJCAI 2011, 2011."},{"key":"ref006","unstructured":"G.\u00a0Brewka, S.\u00a0Ellmauthaler, H.\u00a0Strass, J.P.\u00a0Wallner and S.\u00a0Woltran, Abstract dialectical frameworks revisited, in: Proc. IJCAI\/AAAI 2013, 2013."},{"key":"ref007","unstructured":"G.\u00a0Brewka and S.\u00a0Woltran, Abstract dialectical frameworks, in: Proc. of KR 2010, AAAI Press, 2010, pp.\u00a0102\u2013111."},{"key":"ref008","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"C.\u00a0Cayrol and M.\u00a0Lagasquie-Schiex, Bipolar abstract argumentation system, in: Argumentation in AI, Springer Verlag, 2009.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-0-387-98197-0_4"},{"key":"ref009","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0004-3702(94)00041-X"},{"key":"ref010","unstructured":"K.\u00a0Eshghi and R.A.\u00a0Kowalski, Abduction compared with negation by failure, in: Logic Programming: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference, The MIT Press, Cambridge, and Massachusetts, 1989, pp.\u00a0234\u2013254."},{"key":"ref011","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/19462166.2012.704398"},{"issue":"3","key":"ref012","first-page":"630","volume":"38","author":"Gelder A.V.","year":"1991","journal-title":"J. of ACM"},{"key":"ref013","unstructured":"M.\u00a0Gelfond and V.\u00a0Lifschitz, The stable model semantics for logic programming, in: Proc. of 5th ICLP, MIT Press, 1988, pp.\u00a01070\u20131080."},{"key":"ref014","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/logcom\/exq018"},{"key":"ref015","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0743-1066(92)90015-U"},{"key":"ref016","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2009.02.001"},{"key":"ref017","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"S.\u00a0Nielsen and S.\u00a0Parsons, A generalization of Dung\u2019s abstract framework for argumentation: Arguing with sets of attacking argments, in: Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems, LNCS, Vol.\u00a04766, 2006, pp.\u00a054\u201373. doi:10.1007\/978-3-540-75526-5_4.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-540-75526-5_4"},{"key":"ref018","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3233\/FI-1990-13404"},{"key":"ref019","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"D.\u00a0Sacca and C.\u00a0Zaniolo, Stable models and nondeterminism for logic programs with negation, in: Proc. of the ACM SIGMOD-SIGACT Symposium on Principles of Database Systems, 1990, pp.\u00a0205\u2013217.","DOI":"10.1145\/298514.298572"},{"key":"ref020","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2013.09.004"},{"key":"ref021","unstructured":"H.\u00a0Strass, Expressiveness of two-valued semantics for ADF, JAIR (2015)."},{"key":"ref022","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2015.05.003"},{"key":"ref023","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s11225-009-9210-5"}],"container-title":["Argument &amp; Computation"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.3233\/AAC-180427","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.3233\/AAC-180427","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.3233\/AAC-180427","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,28]],"date-time":"2026-04-28T11:53:53Z","timestamp":1777377233000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/10.3233\/AAC-180427"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2018,10,26]]},"references-count":23,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,11,12]]}},"alternative-id":["10.3233\/AAC-180427"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3233\/aac-180427","relation":{},"ISSN":["1946-2166","1946-2174"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1946-2166","type":"print"},{"value":"1946-2174","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2018,10,26]]}}}