{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,29]],"date-time":"2026-04-29T03:43:37Z","timestamp":1777434217515,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":80,"publisher":"SAGE Publications","issue":"1-2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,11,14]],"date-time":"2019-11-14T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1573689600000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["journals.sagepub.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Argument &amp; Computation"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,5,19]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>The notion of similarity has been studied in many areas of Computer Science; in a general sense, this concept is defined to provide a measure of the semantic equivalence between two pieces of knowledge, expressing how \u201cclose\u201d their meaning can be regarded. In this work, we study similarity as a tool useful to improve the representation of arguments, the interpretation of the relations between arguments, and the semantic evaluation associated with the arguments in the argumentative process. In this direction, we present a novel mechanism to determine the similarity between two arguments based on descriptors representing particular aspects associated with these arguments. This mechanism involves a comparison process influenced by the context in which the process develops, where this context provides the relevant aspects that need to be analyzed in the application domain. Then, we use this similarity measure as a quantity to compute the result of attacks and supports in the argumentation process. These valuations, applied to a Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks, allowed us to refine the argument relations, providing the tools to establish a family of new argumentation semantics that considers the similarity between arguments as a crucial part for the argumentation process.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.3233\/aac-190479","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2019,11,15]],"date-time":"2019-11-15T11:47:42Z","timestamp":1573818462000},"page":"103-149","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/sage-journals-update-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":8,"title":["Similarity notions in bipolar abstract argumentation"],"prefix":"10.1177","volume":"11","author":[{"given":"Paola Daniela","family":"Bud\u00e1n","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Faculty of Exact Sciences and Technologies, Universidad Nacional de Santiago del Estero, Santiago del Estero, Argentina"},{"name":"Artificial Intelligence R&D Laboratory, Department of Computer Science and Engineering Universidad Nacional del Sur, Bah\u00eda Blanca, Argentina. E-mail:\u00a0"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Melisa Gisselle","family":"Esca\u00f1uela Gonzalez","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Faculty of Exact Sciences and Technologies, Universidad Nacional de Santiago del Estero, Santiago del Estero, Argentina"},{"name":"Argentine National Council of Scientific and Technical Research (CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina. E-mails:\u00a0,\u00a0"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Maximiliano Celmo David","family":"Bud\u00e1n","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Faculty of Exact Sciences and Technologies, Universidad Nacional de Santiago del Estero, Santiago del Estero, Argentina"},{"name":"Institute for Computer Science and Engineering (CONICET-UNS), Buenos Aires-Bah\u00eda Blanca, Argentina"},{"name":"Argentine National Council of Scientific and Technical Research (CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina. E-mails:\u00a0,\u00a0"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Maria Vanina","family":"Martinez","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Argentine National Council of Scientific and Technical Research (CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina. E-mails:\u00a0,\u00a0"},{"name":"Institute for Computer Science Research (CONICET-UBA), Buenos Aires, Argentina"},{"name":"Department of Computer Science, Universidad de Buenos Aires (UBA), Buenos Aires, Argentina. E-mail:\u00a0"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Guillermo Ricardo","family":"Simari","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Artificial Intelligence R&D Laboratory, Department of Computer Science and Engineering Universidad Nacional del Sur, Bah\u00eda Blanca, Argentina. E-mail:\u00a0"},{"name":"Institute for Computer Science and Engineering (CONICET-UNS), Buenos Aires-Bah\u00eda Blanca, Argentina"},{"name":"Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Universidad Nacional del Sur (UNS), Buenos Aires-Bah\u00eda Blanca, Argentina. E-mail:\u00a0"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"179","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2019,11,14]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref001","unstructured":"E.\u00a0Agirre, M.\u00a0Diab, D.\u00a0Cer and A.\u00a0Gonzalez-Agirre, Semeval-2012 task 6: A pilot on semantic textual similarity, in: Proceedings of the First Joint Conference on Lexical and Computational Semantics \u2013 Volume 1: Proceedings of the Main Conference and the Shared Task, and Volume 2: Proceedings of the Sixth International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation, Association for Computational Linguistics, 2012, pp.\u00a0385\u2013393."},{"key":"ref002","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"E.\u00a0Agirre and P.\u00a0Edmonds, Word Sense Disambiguation: Algorithms and Applications, Text, Speech and Language Technology, Vol.\u00a033, Springer, 2007.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-1-4020-4809-8"},{"key":"ref003","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"D.\u00a0Alagi\u0107, J.\u00a0\u0160najder and S.\u00a0Pad\u00f3, Leveraging lexical substitutes for unsupervised word sense induction, in: Thirty-Second AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-18), 2018.","DOI":"10.1609\/aaai.v32i1.12017"},{"key":"ref004","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eswa.2015.09.028"},{"key":"ref005","unstructured":"L.\u00a0Amgoud and J.\u00a0Ben-Naim, Evaluation of arguments from support relations: Axioms and semantics, in: Proc. of the Twenty-Fifth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI, New York, USA, S.\u00a0Kambhampati, ed. IJCAI\/AAAI Press, 2016, pp.\u00a0900\u2013906."},{"key":"ref006","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijar.2018.05.004"},{"key":"ref007","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"L.\u00a0Amgoud and J.\u00a0Ben-Naim, Weighted bipolar argumentation graphs: Axioms and semantics, in: Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI, J.\u00a0Lang, ed. ijcai.org, Stockholm, 2018, pp.\u00a05194\u20135198.","DOI":"10.24963\/ijcai.2018\/720"},{"key":"ref008","unstructured":"L.\u00a0Amgoud, E.\u00a0Bonzon, J.\u00a0Delobelle, D.\u00a0Doder, S.\u00a0Konieczny and N.\u00a0Maudet, Gradual semantics accounting for similarity between arguments, in: Sixteenth International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, 2018."},{"key":"ref009","unstructured":"L.\u00a0Amgoud and C.\u00a0Cayrol, On the acceptability of arguments in preference-based argumentation, in: Proceedings of the Fourteenth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., 1998, pp.\u00a01\u20137."},{"key":"ref010","unstructured":"L.\u00a0Amgoud, C.\u00a0Cayrol and M.C.\u00a0Lagasquie-Schiex, On the bipolarity in argumentation frameworks, in: NMR, Vol.\u00a04, 2004, pp.\u00a01\u20139."},{"key":"ref011","unstructured":"L.\u00a0Amgoud and V.\u00a0David, Measuring similarity between logical arguments, in: Sixteenth International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, 2018."},{"key":"ref012","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-29765-7_1"},{"key":"ref013","unstructured":"L.\u00a0Amgoud and D.\u00a0Doder, Gradual semantics accounting for varied-strength attacks, in: Proc. of the 18th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems, AAMAS \u201919, Montreal, QC, Canada, E.\u00a0Elkind, M.\u00a0Veloso, N.\u00a0Agmon and M.E.\u00a0Taylor, eds, Int. Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, 2019, pp.\u00a01270\u20131278."},{"key":"ref014","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-33353-8_3"},{"key":"ref015","unstructured":"T.\u00a0Bench-Capon, Value based argumentation frameworks, Preprint, 2002. arXiv:cs\/0207059."},{"key":"ref016","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/b104925"},{"key":"ref017","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijar.2016.12.016"},{"key":"ref018","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijar.2017.01.013"},{"key":"ref019","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ins.2019.08.037"},{"key":"ref020","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jal.2015.02.005"},{"key":"ref021","unstructured":"P.D.\u00a0Bud\u00e1n, M.V.\u00a0Martinez, M.C.D.\u00a0Bud\u00e1n and G.R.\u00a0Simari, Introducing analogy in abstract argumentation, in: WL4AI-2015, 2015, p.\u00a025."},{"key":"ref022","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/11518655_33"},{"key":"ref023","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/11518655_32"},{"key":"ref024","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1613\/jair.1411"},{"key":"ref025","unstructured":"L.\u00a0Cecchi and G.R.\u00a0Simari, Sobre la relaci\u00f3n de preferencias entre argumentos, in: VIII Congreso Argentino de Ciencias de la Computaci\u00f3n, 2002."},{"key":"ref026","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0022-5371(69)80069-1"},{"key":"ref027","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"E.A.\u00a0Corr\u00eaa Jr and D.R.\u00a0Amancio, Word sense induction using word embeddings and community detection in complex networks, Preprint, 2018. arXiv:1803.08476.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.physa.2019.02.032"},{"key":"ref028","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ins.2018.02.047"},{"key":"ref029","unstructured":"H.\u00a0Douglas and E.\u00a0Sander, Surfaces and Essences: Analogy as the Fuel and Fire of Thinking, Basic Books, New York, 2013."},{"key":"ref030","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/03081078208934833"},{"key":"ref031","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1109\/IADCC.2009.4809246"},{"key":"ref032","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0004-3702(94)00041-X"},{"key":"ref033","unstructured":"P.E.\u00a0Dunne, A.\u00a0Hunter, P.\u00a0McBurney, S.\u00a0Parsons and M.\u00a0Wooldridge, Inconsistency tolerance in weighted argument systems, in: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, Vol.\u00a02, International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, 2009, pp.\u00a0851\u2013858."},{"key":"ref034","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2010.09.005"},{"key":"ref035","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/S1471068403001674"},{"key":"ref036","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/19462166.2013.869767"},{"key":"ref037","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2105-13-261"},{"key":"ref038","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-03129-8_3"},{"key":"ref039","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.7551\/mitpress\/1251.001.0001"},{"key":"ref040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"N.\u00a0Guarino, D.\u00a0Oberle and S.\u00a0Staab, What is an ontology? in: Handbook on Ontologies, Springer, 2009, pp.\u00a01\u201317.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-540-92673-3_0"},{"key":"ref041","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1162\/COLI_a_00276"},{"key":"ref042","unstructured":"L.\u00a0Han, A.L.\u00a0Kashyap, T.\u00a0Finin, J.\u00a0Mayfield and J.\u00a0Weese, UMBC_EBIQUITY-CORE: Semantic textual similarity systems, in: Second Joint Conference on Lexical and Computational Semantics (* SEM), Volume 1: Proceedings of the Main Conference and the Shared Task: Semantic Textual Similarity, 2013, pp.\u00a044\u201352."},{"key":"ref043","unstructured":"M.B.\u00a0Hesse, Models and Analogies in Science, Vol.\u00a07, University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, 1966."},{"key":"ref044","unstructured":"A.\u00a0Huang, Similarity measures for text document clustering, in: Proceedings of the Sixth New Zealand Computer Science Research Student Conference (NZCSRSC2008), Christchurch, New Zealand, 2008, pp.\u00a049\u201356."},{"key":"ref045","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijar.2013.09.002"},{"key":"ref046","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-540-30597-2_7"},{"key":"ref047","first-page":"223","volume":"44","author":"Jaccard P.","year":"1908","journal-title":"Bull. Soc. Vaud. Sci. Nat."},{"key":"ref048","unstructured":"J.J.\u00a0Jiang and D.W.\u00a0Conrath, Semantic similarity based on corpus statistics and lexical taxonomy, Preprint, 1997. arXiv:cmp-lg\/9709008."},{"key":"ref049","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"J.\u00a0Lawrence, C.\u00a0Reed, C.\u00a0Allen, S.\u00a0McAlister, A.\u00a0Ravenscroft and D.\u00a0Bourget, Mining arguments from 19th century philosophical texts using topic based modelling, in: ACL 2014, 2014, p.\u00a079.","DOI":"10.3115\/v1\/W14-2111"},{"key":"ref050","unstructured":"Q.\u00a0Le and T.\u00a0Mikolov, Distributed representations of sentences and documents, in: International Conference on Machine Learning, 2014, pp.\u00a01188\u20131196."},{"issue":"1","key":"ref051","first-page":"147","volume":"24","author":"Leacock C.","year":"1998","journal-title":"Computational Linguistics"},{"key":"ref052","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"M.A.\u00a0Leiva, G.I.\u00a0Simari, S.\u00a0Gottifredi, A.J.\u00a0Garc\u00eda and G.R.\u00a0Simari, DAQAP: defeasible argumentation query answering platform, in: Flexible Query Answering Systems \u2013 13th International Conference, FQAS 2019, Amantea, Italy, July 2\u20135, 2019, Proceedings, A.\u00a0Cuzzocrea, S.\u00a0Greco, H.L.\u00a0Larsen, D.\u00a0Sacc\u00e0, T.\u00a0Andreasen and H.\u00a0Christiansen, eds, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol.\u00a011529, Springer, 2019, pp.\u00a0126\u2013138.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-27629-4_14"},{"key":"ref053","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"M.\u00a0Lesk, Automatic sense disambiguation using machine readable dictionaries: How to tell a pine cone from an ice cream cone, in: Proceedings of the 5th Annual International Conference on Systems Documentation, ACM, 1986, pp.\u00a024\u201326.","DOI":"10.1145\/318723.318728"},{"key":"ref054","unstructured":"D.\u00a0Lin, An information-theoretic definition of similarity, in: Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML \u201998, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, 1998, pp.\u00a0296\u2013304. ISBN 1-55860-556-8."},{"key":"ref055","unstructured":"M.\u00a0Lippi and P.\u00a0Torroni, Context-independent claim detection for argument mining, in: Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Inter. Conference on AI, 2015, pp.\u00a0185\u2013191."},{"key":"ref056","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/2850417"},{"key":"ref057","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1587\/transinf.2017EDP7090"},{"key":"ref058","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.websem.2008.04.001"},{"key":"ref059","unstructured":"D.C.\u00a0Mart\u00ednez, A.J.\u00a0Garc\u00eda and G.R.\u00a0Simari, An abstract argumentation framework with varied-strength attacks, in: Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning: Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference, KR, G.\u00a0Brewka and J.\u00a0Lang, eds, AAAI Press, 2008, pp.\u00a0135\u2013144."},{"key":"ref060","unstructured":"D.C.\u00a0Mart\u00ednez, A.J.\u00a0Garc\u00eda and G.R.\u00a0Simari, Strong and weak forms of abstract argument defense, in: Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA, P.\u00a0Besnard, S.\u00a0Doutre and A.\u00a0Hunter, eds, Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, Vol.\u00a0172, IOS Press, Amsterdam, 2008, pp.\u00a0216\u2013227."},{"key":"ref061","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"A.\u00a0Misra, B.\u00a0Ecker and M.A.\u00a0Walker, Measuring the similarity of sentential arguments in dialogue, in: Proceedings of the SIGDIAL 2016 Conference, the 17th Annual Meeting of the Special Interest Group on Discourse and Dialogue, 13\u201315 September 2016, Los Angeles, CA, USA, 2016, pp.\u00a0276\u2013287, http:\/\/aclweb.org\/anthology\/W\/W16\/W16-3636.pdf.","DOI":"10.18653\/v1\/W16-3636"},{"key":"ref062","unstructured":"A.\u00a0Misra, B.\u00a0Ecker and M.A.\u00a0Walker, Measuring the similarity of sentential arguments in dialog, Preprint, 2017. arxiv:1709.01887."},{"key":"ref063","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2009.02.001"},{"key":"ref064","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3233\/AAC-170025"},{"key":"ref065","unstructured":"M.\u00a0Palmirani, Dealing with qualitative and quantitative features in legal domains, in: Legal Knowledge and Information Systems: JURIX 2018: The Thirty-First Annual Conference, Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, Vol.\u00a0313, IOS Press, 2018, pp.\u00a0176\u2013180."},{"key":"ref066","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.18653\/v1\/D15-1110"},{"key":"ref067","unstructured":"N.\u00a0Potyka, Continuous dynamical systems for weighted bipolar argumentation, in: Sixteenth International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, 2018, pp.\u00a0148\u2013157."},{"key":"ref068","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-54516-0"},{"key":"ref069","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1109\/21.24528"},{"key":"ref070","unstructured":"P.\u00a0Resnik, Using information content to evaluate semantic similarity in a taxonomy, Preprint, 1995. arXiv:cmp-lg\/9511007."},{"key":"ref071","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3233\/AO-140132"},{"key":"ref072","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-67786-6_24"},{"key":"ref073","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-540-45091-7_2"},{"key":"ref074","unstructured":"R.\u00a0Thiagarajan, G.\u00a0Manjunath and M.\u00a0Stumptner, Computing semantic similarity using ontologies, Technical Report HPL-2008-87, HP Laboratories, 2008."},{"key":"ref075","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1037\/0033-295X.84.4.327"},{"key":"ref076","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"D.\u00a0Walton, Fundamentals of Critical Argumentation, Cambridge University Press, 2006.","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511807039"},{"key":"ref077","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-010-9102-z"},{"key":"ref078","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.22329\/il.v32i2.3159"},{"key":"ref079","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511802034"},{"key":"ref080","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Z.\u00a0Wu and M.\u00a0Palmer, Verbs semantics and lexical selection, in: Proceedings of the 32nd annual meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, Association for Computational Linguistics, 1994, pp.\u00a0133\u2013138.","DOI":"10.3115\/981732.981751"}],"container-title":["Argument &amp; Computation"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.3233\/AAC-190479","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.3233\/AAC-190479","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.3233\/AAC-190479","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,28]],"date-time":"2026-04-28T11:53:12Z","timestamp":1777377192000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/10.3233\/AAC-190479"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2019,11,14]]},"references-count":80,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1-2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,5,19]]}},"alternative-id":["10.3233\/AAC-190479"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3233\/aac-190479","relation":{},"ISSN":["1946-2166","1946-2174"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1946-2166","type":"print"},{"value":"1946-2174","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2019,11,14]]}}}