{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,16]],"date-time":"2026-07-16T21:19:09Z","timestamp":1784236749357,"version":"3.55.0"},"reference-count":119,"publisher":"SAGE Publications","issue":"1-2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,5,5]],"date-time":"2020-05-05T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1588636800000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["journals.sagepub.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Argument & Computation"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,5,19]]},"DOI":"10.3233\/aac-200901","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,5,5]],"date-time":"2020-05-05T10:49:14Z","timestamp":1588675754000},"page":"1-14","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/sage-journals-update-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":16,"title":["On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games: 25\u00a0years\u00a0later"],"prefix":"10.1177","volume":"11","author":[{"given":"Pietro","family":"Baroni","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Brescia, Italy. E-mail:\u00a0"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Francesca","family":"Toni","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Imperial College London, United Kingdom. E-mail:\u00a0"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Bart","family":"Verheij","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Groningen, The Netherlands. E-mail:\u00a0"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"179","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2020,5,5]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref001","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2007.02.003"},{"key":"ref002","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1014490210693"},{"key":"ref003","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijar.2013.10.010"},{"key":"ref004","unstructured":"K.D.\u00a0Ashley, Modeling Legal Arguments: Reasoning with Cases and Hypotheticals, The MIT Press, Cambridge (Massachusetts), 1990."},{"key":"ref005","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1609\/aimag.v38i3.2704"},{"key":"ref006","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2007.04.009"},{"key":"ref007","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2014.08.004"},{"key":"ref008","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/S0269888911000166"},{"key":"ref009","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijar.2010.05.004"},{"key":"ref010","unstructured":"P.\u00a0Baroni, D.\u00a0Gabbay, M.\u00a0Giacomin and L.\u00a0van der Torre\u00a0(eds), Handbook of Formal Argumentation, College Publications, London, 2018."},{"key":"ref011","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2007.04.004"},{"key":"ref012","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2005.05.006"},{"key":"ref013","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"E.M.\u00a0Barth and E.C.W.\u00a0Krabbe, From Axiom to Dialogue. A Philosophical Study of Logics and Argumentation, De Gruyter, New York (New York), 1982.","DOI":"10.1515\/9783110839807"},{"key":"ref014","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/logcom\/13.3.429"},{"key":"ref015","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2006.10.013"},{"key":"ref016","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2007.05.001"},{"key":"ref017","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/19462166.2013.869764"},{"key":"ref018","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"P.\u00a0Besnard and A.\u00a0Hunter, Elements of Argumentation, The MIT Press, Cambridge (Massachusetts), 2008.","DOI":"10.7551\/mitpress\/9780262026437.001.0001"},{"key":"ref019","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1023\/B:ARTI.0000046007.11806.9a"},{"key":"ref020","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-010-9092-x"},{"key":"ref021","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0004-3702(97)00015-5"},{"key":"ref022","unstructured":"G.\u00a0Brewka, H.\u00a0Strass, S.\u00a0Ellmauthaler, J.P.\u00a0Wallner and S.\u00a0Woltran, Abstract dialectical frameworks revisited, in: Proc. of the 23rd International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2013), 2013, pp.\u00a0803\u2013809."},{"key":"ref023","unstructured":"G.\u00a0Brewka and S.\u00a0Woltran, Abstract dialectical frameworks, in: Proc. of the 12th International Conference on the Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR 2010), 2010, pp.\u00a0102\u2013111."},{"key":"ref024","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1006\/ijhc.1994.1029"},{"key":"ref025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"E.\u00a0Cabrio and S.\u00a0Villata, Five years of argument mining: A data-driven analysis, in: Proc. of the 27th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2018), J.\u00a0Lang, ed. 2018, pp.\u00a05427\u20135433.","DOI":"10.24963\/ijcai.2018\/766"},{"key":"ref026","unstructured":"M.\u00a0Caminada, Semi-stable semantics, in: Proc. of the 1st International Conference on Computational Models of Argument (COMMA 2006), P.E.\u00a0Dunne and T.J.M.\u00a0Bench-Capon, eds, IOS Press, Amsterdam, 2006, pp.\u00a0121\u2013130."},{"key":"ref027","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s11225-009-9218-x"},{"key":"ref028","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-0-387-98197-0_4"},{"key":"ref029","unstructured":"F.\u00a0Cerutti, S.A.\u00a0Gaggl, M.\u00a0Thimm and J.P.\u00a0Wallner, Foundations of implementations for formal argumentation, in: Handbook of Formal Argumentation, P.\u00a0Baroni, D.\u00a0Gabbay, M.\u00a0Giacomin and L.\u00a0van der Torre, eds, College Publications, London, 2018, pp.\u00a0689\u2013767."},{"key":"ref030","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2014.11.008"},{"key":"ref031","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/371578.371581"},{"key":"ref032","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/S0269888906001044"},{"key":"ref033","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"O.\u00a0Cocarascu and F.\u00a0Toni, Argumentation for machine learning: A survey, in: Proc. of the 6th International Conference on Computational Models of Argument (COMMA 2016), P.\u00a0Baroni, T.F.\u00a0Gordon, T.\u00a0Scheffler and M.\u00a0Stede, eds, IOS Press, Amsterdam, 2016, pp.\u00a0219\u2013230.","DOI":"10.3233\/978-1-61499-686-6-219"},{"key":"ref034","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1162\/coli_a_00338"},{"key":"ref035","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2015.12.004"},{"key":"ref036","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-69131-2_23"},{"key":"ref037","unstructured":"K.\u00a0Cyras and F.\u00a0Toni, ABA+: Assumption-based argumentation with preferences, in: Proc. of the 15th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR 2016), B.\u00a0Baral, J.P.\u00a0Delgrande and F.\u00a0Wolter, eds, AAAI Press, 2016, pp.\u00a0553\u2013556."},{"key":"ref038","unstructured":"P.M.\u00a0Dung, On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning and logic programming, in: Proc. of the 13th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 93), 1993, pp.\u00a0852\u2013859."},{"key":"ref039","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0004-3702(94)00041-X"},{"key":"ref040","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2005.07.002"},{"key":"ref041","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2007.05.003"},{"key":"ref042","unstructured":"P.M.\u00a0Dung and P.M.\u00a0Thang, Towards (probabilistic) argumentation for jury-based dispute resolution, in: Proc. of the 3rd International Conference on Computational Models of Argument (COMMA 2010), P.\u00a0Baroni, F.\u00a0Cerutti, M.\u00a0Giacomin and G.R.\u00a0Simari, eds, IOS Press, Amsterdam, 2010, pp.\u00a0171\u2013182."},{"key":"ref043","unstructured":"P.M.\u00a0Dung, F.\u00a0Toni and P.\u00a0Mancarella, Some design guidelines for practical argumentation systems, in: Proc. of the 3rd International Conference on Computational Models of Argument (COMMA 2010), P.\u00a0Baroni, F.\u00a0Cerutti, M.\u00a0Giacomin and G.R.\u00a0Simari, eds, IOS Press, Amsterdam, 2010, pp.\u00a0183\u2013194."},{"key":"ref044","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0004-3702(02)00261-8"},{"key":"ref045","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2010.09.005"},{"key":"ref046","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-0-387-98197-0_5"},{"key":"ref047","unstructured":"W.\u00a0Dvor\u00e1k and P.E.\u00a0Dunne, Computational problems in formal argumentation and their complexity, in: Handbook of Formal Argumentation, P.\u00a0Baroni, D.\u00a0Gabbay, M.\u00a0Giacomin and L.\u00a0van der Torre, eds, College Publications, London, 2018, pp.\u00a0631\u2013687."},{"key":"ref048","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/19462166.2010.486479"},{"key":"ref049","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0004-3702(02)00258-8"},{"key":"ref050","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2014.06.001"},{"key":"ref051","unstructured":"E.\u00a0Ferm\u00e9, D.M.\u00a0Gabbay and G.R.\u00a0Simari\u00a0(eds), Trends in Belief Revision and Argumentation Dynamics, College Publications, London, 2013."},{"key":"ref052","unstructured":"J.\u00a0Fox and S.\u00a0Das, Safe and Sound: Artificial Intelligence in Hazardous Applications, The MIT Press, Cambridge (Massachusetts), 2000."},{"key":"ref053","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/19462166.2012.704398"},{"key":"ref054","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"D.M.\u00a0Gabbay, C.J.\u00a0Hogger and J.A.\u00a0Robinson\u00a0(eds), Handbook of Logic in Artificial Intelligence and Logic Programming. Volume 3. Nonmonotonic Reasoning and Uncertain Reasoning, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1994.","DOI":"10.1093\/oso\/9780198537465.001.0001"},{"key":"ref055","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"D.M.\u00a0Gabbay, C.J.\u00a0Hogger and J.A.\u00a0Robinson\u00a0(eds), Logic Programming, Handbook of Logic in Artificial Intelligence and Logic Programming., Vol.\u00a05, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1997.","DOI":"10.1093\/oso\/9780198537922.001.0001"},{"key":"ref056","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/S1471068403001674"},{"key":"ref057","unstructured":"B.J.\u00a0Garssen, Argument schemes, in: Crucial Concepts in Argumentation Theory, F.H.\u00a0Van Eemeren, ed. Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam, 1997, pp.\u00a081\u201399."},{"key":"ref058","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"T.F.\u00a0Gordon and N.\u00a0Karacapilidis, The zeno argumentation framework, in: Proc. of the 6th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL 1997), ACM Press, New York (New York), 1997, pp.\u00a010\u201318.","DOI":"10.1145\/261618.261622"},{"key":"ref059","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2007.04.010"},{"key":"ref060","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1006\/ijhc.2000.0429"},{"key":"ref061","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3233\/AAC-191007"},{"key":"ref062","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijar.2012.08.003"},{"key":"ref063","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijar.2013.09.002"},{"key":"ref064","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3233\/AAC-170032"},{"key":"ref065","unstructured":"A.\u00a0Hunter and M.\u00a0Williams, Qualitative evidence aggregation using argumentation, in: Proc. of the 3rd International Conference on Computational Models of Argument (COMMA 2010), P.\u00a0Baroni, F.\u00a0Cerutti, M.\u00a0Giacomin and G.R.\u00a0Simari, eds, IOS Press, Amsterdam, 2010, pp.\u00a0287\u2013298."},{"key":"ref066","unstructured":"M.\u00a0Janier, M.\u00a0Snaith, K.\u00a0Budzynska, J.\u00a0Lawrence and C.\u00a0Reed, A system for dispute mediation: The mediation dialogue game, in: Proc. of the 6th International Conference on Computational Models of Argument (COMMA 2016), P.\u00a0Baroni, T.F.\u00a0Gordon, T.\u00a0Scheffler and M.\u00a0Stede, eds, IOS Press, Amsterdam, 2016, pp.\u00a0351\u2013358."},{"key":"ref067","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/logcom\/9.4.515"},{"key":"ref068","unstructured":"M.\u00a0Lippi and P.\u00a0Torroni, Context-independent claim detection for argument mining, in: Proc. of the 24th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2015), Q.\u00a0Yang and M.\u00a0Wooldridge, eds, 2015, pp.\u00a0185\u2013191."},{"key":"ref069","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1467-8640.1987.tb00178.x"},{"key":"ref070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"R.P.\u00a0Loui, Hart\u2019s critics on defeasible concepts and ascriptivism, in: Proc. of the 5th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL 1995), ACM Press, New York (New York), 1995, pp.\u00a021\u201330.","DOI":"10.1145\/222092.222099"},{"key":"ref071","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3233\/AAC-192101"},{"key":"ref072","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-540-87803-2_24"},{"key":"ref073","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/int.20191"},{"key":"ref074","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1015586128739"},{"key":"ref075","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"R.\u00a0Mochales Palau and M.F.\u00a0Moens, Argumentation mining: The detection, classification and structure of arguments in text, in: Proc. of the 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL 2009), ACM Press, New York (New York), 2009, pp.\u00a098\u2013107.","DOI":"10.1145\/1568234.1568246"},{"key":"ref076","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-010-9104-x"},{"key":"ref077","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2009.02.001"},{"key":"ref078","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-0-387-98197-0_6"},{"key":"ref079","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2012.10.008"},{"key":"ref080","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/logcom\/8.3.261"},{"key":"ref081","unstructured":"C.\u00a0Perelman and L.\u00a0Olbrechts-Tyteca, The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation [English Translation of la Nouvelle Rh\u00e9torique: Trait\u00e9 de L\u2019argumentation], University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame (Indiana), 1958\/1969."},{"key":"ref082","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1207\/s15516709cog1104_4"},{"key":"ref083","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"J.L.\u00a0Pollock, Cognitive Carpentry: A Blueprint for How to Build a Person, The MIT Press, Cambridge (Massachusetts), 1995.","DOI":"10.7551\/mitpress\/1887.001.0001"},{"key":"ref084","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/19462161003728921"},{"key":"ref085","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/19462160903564592"},{"key":"ref086","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00118496"},{"key":"ref087","unstructured":"H.\u00a0Prakken and G.A.W.\u00a0Vreeswijk, Logics for defeasible argumentation, in: Handbook of Philosophical Logic, D.M.\u00a0Gabbay and F.\u00a0Guenthner, eds, Vol.\u00a04, 2nd edn, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 2002, pp.\u00a0218\u2013319."},{"key":"ref088","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/S0269888904000098"},{"key":"ref089","unstructured":"I.\u00a0Rahwan and G.R.\u00a0Simari\u00a0(eds), Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence, Springer, Berlin, 2009."},{"key":"ref090","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2007.04.015"},{"key":"ref091","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1142\/S0218213004001922"},{"key":"ref092","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/int.20187"},{"key":"ref093","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"C.\u00a0Reed and T.J.\u00a0Norman\u00a0(eds), Argumentation Machines. New Frontiers in Argument and Computation, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 2004.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-017-0431-1"},{"key":"ref094","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/S0269888907001051"},{"key":"ref095","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0004-3702(80)90014-4"},{"key":"ref096","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"E.L.\u00a0Rissland and K.D.\u00a0Ashley, A case-based system for trade secrets law, in: Proc. of the 1st International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL 1987), ACM Press, New York (New York), 1987, pp.\u00a060\u201366.","DOI":"10.1145\/41735.41743"},{"key":"ref097","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0004-3702(03)00122-X"},{"key":"ref098","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/BF01405730"},{"key":"ref099","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3233\/AAC-170018"},{"key":"ref100","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0004-3702(92)90069-A"},{"key":"ref101","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"M.\u00a0Stede and J.\u00a0Schneider, Argumentation Mining, Morgan & Claypool Publishers, 2018.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-031-02169-5"},{"key":"ref102","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1109\/MIS.2007.103"},{"key":"ref103","unstructured":"M.\u00a0Thimm, A probabilistic semantics for abstract argumentation, in: Proc. of the 20th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI 2012), IOS Press, Amsterdam, 2012, pp.\u00a0750\u2013755."},{"key":"ref104","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1609\/aimag.v37i1.2640"},{"key":"ref105","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2012.09.010"},{"key":"ref106","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/19462166.2013.869878"},{"key":"ref107","unstructured":"S.E.\u00a0Toulmin, The Uses of Argument, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1958."},{"key":"ref108","unstructured":"L.\u00a0van der Torre and S.\u00a0Vesic, The principle-based approach to abstract argumentation semantics, in: Handbook of Formal Argumentation, P.\u00a0Baroni, D.\u00a0Gabbay, M.\u00a0Giacomin and L.\u00a0van der Torre, eds, College Publications, London, 2018, pp.\u00a0797\u2013837."},{"key":"ref109","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"F.H.\u00a0van Eemeren, B.\u00a0Garssen, E.C.W.\u00a0Krabbe, A.F.\u00a0Snoeck Henkemans, B.\u00a0Verheij and J.H.M.\u00a0Wagemans, Handbook of Argumentation Theory, Springer, Berlin, 2014.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-90-481-9473-5"},{"key":"ref110","unstructured":"F.H.\u00a0van Eemeren and R.\u00a0Grootendorst, Argumentation, Communication, and Fallacies. A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, 1992."},{"key":"ref111","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"T.\u00a0van Gelder, Enhancing deliberation through computer supported argument visualization, in: Visualizing Argumentation: Software Tools for Collaborative and Educational Sense-Making, P.A.\u00a0Kirschner, S.J.B.\u00a0Shum and C.S.\u00a0Carr, eds, Springer, 2003, pp.\u00a097\u2013115.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-1-4471-0037-9_5"},{"key":"ref112","unstructured":"B.\u00a0Verheij, Two approaches to dialectical argumentation: Admissible sets and argumentation stages, in: Proc. of the 8th Dutch Conference on Artificial Intelligence (NAIC 96), J.J.\u00a0Meyer and L.C.\u00a0van der Gaag, eds, Universiteit, Utrecht, Utrecht, 1996, pp.\u00a0357\u2013368."},{"key":"ref113","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/logcom\/13.3.319"},{"key":"ref114","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1023\/B:ARTI.0000046008.49443.36"},{"key":"ref115","unstructured":"B.\u00a0Verheij, Virtual Arguments. On the Design of Argument Assistants for Lawyers and Other Arguers, T.M.C. Asser Press, The Hague, 2005."},{"key":"ref116","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0004-3702(96)00041-0"},{"key":"ref117","unstructured":"D.N.\u00a0Walton, Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning, Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, New Jersey, 2005."},{"key":"ref118","unstructured":"D.N.\u00a0Walton and E.C.W.\u00a0Krabbe, Commitment in Dialogue. Basic Concepts of Interpersonal Reasoning, State University of New York Press, Albany (New York), 1995."},{"key":"ref119","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"D.N.\u00a0Walton, C.\u00a0Reed and F.\u00a0Macagno, Argumentation Schemes, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2008.","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511802034"}],"container-title":["Argument & Computation"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.3233\/AAC-200901","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.3233\/AAC-200901","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.3233\/AAC-200901","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,28]],"date-time":"2026-04-28T11:53:12Z","timestamp":1777377192000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/10.3233\/AAC-200901"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,5,5]]},"references-count":119,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1-2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,5,19]]}},"alternative-id":["10.3233\/AAC-200901"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3233\/aac-200901","relation":{},"ISSN":["1946-2166","1946-2174"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1946-2166","type":"print"},{"value":"1946-2174","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,5,5]]}}}