{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,29]],"date-time":"2026-04-29T03:44:29Z","timestamp":1777434269543,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":17,"publisher":"SAGE Publications","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,12,29]],"date-time":"2021-12-29T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1640736000000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["journals.sagepub.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Argument &amp; Computation"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,10,18]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>We describe a tool that allows the merging of extensions of argumentation frameworks, following the approach defined by (In Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR\u201916) ( 2016 ) 33\u201342). The tool is implemented in Java, and is highly modular thanks to Object Oriented Programming (OOP) principles. We describe a short experimental study that assesses the scalability of the approach, as well as the impact on runtime of using an integrity constraint.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.3233\/aac-210014","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,12,31]],"date-time":"2021-12-31T08:27:53Z","timestamp":1640939273000},"page":"361-368","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/sage-journals-update-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["A tool for merging extensions of abstract argumentation frameworks"],"prefix":"10.1177","volume":"13","author":[{"given":"J\u00e9r\u00f4me","family":"Delobelle","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Universit\u00e9 de Paris, LIPADE, F-75006 Paris, France"}]},{"given":"Jean-Guy","family":"Mailly","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Universit\u00e9 de Paris, LIPADE, F-75006 Paris, France"}]}],"member":"179","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,12,29]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref001","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1126\/science.286.5439.509"},{"key":"ref002","unstructured":"P.\u00a0Baroni, M.\u00a0Caminada and M.\u00a0Giacomin, Abstract argumentation frameworks and their semantics, in: Handbook of Formal Argumentation, P.\u00a0Baroni, D.\u00a0Gabbay, M.\u00a0Giacomin and L.\u00a0van der Torre, eds, College Publications, 2018, pp.\u00a0159\u2013236."},{"key":"ref003","unstructured":"C.\u00a0Cayrol, S.\u00a0Doutre and M.C.\u00a0Lagasquie-Schiex, GRAFIX: A tool for abstract argumentation, in: Proceedings of Computational Models of Argument (COMMA), 2014, pp.\u00a0453\u2013454."},{"key":"ref004","unstructured":"F.\u00a0Cerutti, M.\u00a0Giacomin and M.\u00a0Vallati, Generating structured argumentation frameworks: AFBenchGen2, in: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Computational Models of Argument (COMMA\u201916), 2016, pp.\u00a0467\u2013468."},{"key":"ref005","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1142\/S0218213017500026"},{"key":"ref006","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2018.10.003"},{"key":"ref007","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2007.04.012"},{"key":"ref008","unstructured":"J.\u00a0Delobelle, A.\u00a0Haret, S.\u00a0Konieczny, J.G.\u00a0Mailly, J.\u00a0Rossit and S.\u00a0Woltran, Merging of abstract argumentation frameworks, in: Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR\u201916), 2016, pp.\u00a033\u201342."},{"key":"ref009","unstructured":"J.\u00a0Delobelle, S.\u00a0Konieczny and S.\u00a0Vesic, On the aggregation of argumentation frameworks, in: Proceedings of the 24th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI\u201915), 2015, pp.\u00a02911\u20132917."},{"key":"ref010","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2307\/1932409"},{"key":"ref011","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0004-3702(94)00041-X"},{"key":"ref012","unstructured":"E.\u00a0Gamma, R.\u00a0Helm, R.\u00a0Johnson and J.\u00a0Vlissides, Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software, Addison Wesley, 1994."},{"key":"ref013","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/j.1538-7305.1950.tb00463.x"},{"key":"ref014","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1469-8137.1912.tb05611.x"},{"key":"ref015","unstructured":"S.\u00a0Kaci, L.W.N.\u00a0van der Torre and S.\u00a0Villata, Preference in abstract argumentation, in: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Computational Models of Argument (COMMA\u201918), Vol.\u00a0305, 2018, pp.\u00a0405\u2013412."},{"key":"ref016","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/logcom\/12.5.773"},{"key":"ref017","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-540-77684-0_4"}],"container-title":["Argument &amp; Computation"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.3233\/AAC-210014","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.3233\/AAC-210014","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.3233\/AAC-210014","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,28]],"date-time":"2026-04-28T11:53:21Z","timestamp":1777377201000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/10.3233\/AAC-210014"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,12,29]]},"references-count":17,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,10,18]]}},"alternative-id":["10.3233\/AAC-210014"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3233\/aac-210014","relation":{},"ISSN":["1946-2166","1946-2174"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1946-2166","type":"print"},{"value":"1946-2174","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,12,29]]}}}