{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,29]],"date-time":"2026-04-29T03:44:10Z","timestamp":1777434250126,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":68,"publisher":"SAGE Publications","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,25]],"date-time":"2023-10-25T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1698192000000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["journals.sagepub.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Argument &amp; Computation"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,7,12]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>It is often necessary and reasonable to justify preferences before reasoning from them. Moreover, justifying a preference ordering is reduced to justifying the criterion that produces the ordering. This paper builds on the well-known ASPIC+ formalism to develop a model that integrates justifying qualitative preferences with reasoning from the justified preferences. We first introduce a notion of preference criterion in order to model the way in which preferences are justified by an argumentation framework. We also adapt the notion of argumentation theory to build a sequence of argumentation frameworks, in which an argumentation framework justifies preferences that are to underlie the next framework. That is, in our formalism, preferences become not only an input of an argumentation framework, but also an output of it. This kind of input-output process can be applied in the further steps of argumentation. We also explore some interesting properties of our formalism.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.3233\/aac-220012","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,27]],"date-time":"2023-10-27T11:15:06Z","timestamp":1698405306000},"page":"205-250","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/sage-journals-update-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Argumentation with justified preferences"],"prefix":"10.1177","volume":"15","author":[{"given":"Sung-Jun","family":"Pyon","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Faculty of Philosophy, Kim Il Sung University, Pyongyang, The Democratic People\u2019s Republic of Korea"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"179","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,25]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref001","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1014490210693"},{"issue":"2","key":"ref002","first-page":"125","volume":"29","author":"Amgoud L.","year":"2002","journal-title":"Int. J. Approx. Reason."},{"key":"ref003","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"L.Amgoud, C.Cayrol and D.LeBerre, Comparing arguments using preference orderings for argument-based reasoning, in: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence, 1996, pp. 400\u2013403.","DOI":"10.1109\/TAI.1996.560731"},{"key":"ref004","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1109\/ICMAS.2000.858428"},{"key":"ref005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"L.Amgoud and S.Parsons, An argumentation framework for merging conflicting knowledge bases, in: Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, S.Flesca, S.Greco, N.Leone and G.Ianni, eds, Vol. 2424, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, 2002, pp. 27\u201337.","DOI":"10.1007\/3-540-45757-7_3"},{"key":"ref006","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2008.11.006"},{"key":"ref007","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s10472-011-9271-9"},{"key":"ref008","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-22152-1_8"},{"key":"ref009","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijar.2013.10.010"},{"key":"ref010","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jal.2007.06.005"},{"key":"ref011","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3233\/AAC-200901"},{"key":"ref012","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1613\/jair.1.11791"},{"key":"ref013","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/logcom\/13.3.429"},{"key":"ref014","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3233\/AAC-190477"},{"key":"ref015","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2006.10.013"},{"key":"ref016","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-017-9194-9"},{"key":"ref017","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/B978-1-4832-1451-1.50054-8"},{"key":"ref018","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fss.2008.02.014"},{"key":"ref019","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"P.Bisquert, C.Cayrol, F.D.de Saint-Cyr and M.C.Lagasquie-Schiex, Enforcement in argumentation is a kind of update, in: Proceedings of the Seven\n                      th\n                      International Conference on Scalable Uncertainty Management (SUM\u201913), 2013, pp. 30\u201343.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-40381-1_3"},{"key":"ref020","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-02906-6_11"},{"key":"ref021","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-02906-6_11"},{"key":"ref022","unstructured":"G.Boella, S.Kaci and L.van der Torre, Dynamics in argumentation with single extensions: Attack refinement and the grounded extension, in: Proceedings of the International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagents Systems (AAMAS 2009), 2009, pp. 1213\u20131214."},{"key":"ref023","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-41575-3_7"},{"key":"ref024","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.0824-7935.2004.00236.x"},{"key":"ref025","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2007.07.002"},{"key":"ref026","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eswa.2019.02.021"},{"key":"ref027","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2007.02.003"},{"key":"ref028","unstructured":"K.Cyras and F.Toni, ABA+: Assumption-based argumentation with preferences, in: Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, 15th International Conference, Cape Town, C.Baral, J.P.Delgrande and F.Wolter, eds, AAAI Press, 2016, pp. 553\u2013556."},{"key":"ref029","unstructured":"C.Domshlak and R.Brafman, CP-nets-reasoning and consistency testing, in: Proceedings of KR\u201902, D.Fensel and F.Giunchiglia, eds, 2002, pp. 121\u2013132."},{"key":"ref030","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3233\/AAC-180425"},{"key":"ref031","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0004-3702(94)00041-X"},{"key":"ref032","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"P.M.Dung, P.M.Thang and T.C.Son, On structured argumentation with conditional preferences, in: The Thirty-Third AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI Press, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA, 2019, pp. 2792\u20132800.","DOI":"10.1609\/aaai.v33i01.33012792"},{"key":"ref033","unstructured":"J.Fahnestock and M.Secor, A Rhetoric of Argument, 2nd edn, McGraw Hill Publisher, Boston, 1982."},{"key":"ref034","unstructured":"E.Ferretti, M.Errecalde, A.J.Garcia and G.R.Simari, Decision rules and arguments in defeasible decision making, in: Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA, Toulouse, 2008, pp. 171\u2013182."},{"key":"ref035","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2016.10.004"},{"key":"ref036","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijar.2019.03.006"},{"key":"ref037","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2007.04.010"},{"key":"ref038","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijar.2018.10.020"},{"key":"ref039","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3233\/AAC-200903"},{"key":"ref040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"K.V.Hindriks, W.Visser and C.M.Jonker, Multi-attribute preference logic, in: Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, N.Desai, A.Liu and M.Winikoff, eds, Vol. 7057, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, 2009, pp. 181\u2013195.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-25920-3_13"},{"key":"ref041","unstructured":"S.Kaci, L.van der Torre and E.Weydert, Acyclic argumentation: Attack = conflict + preference, in: Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, G.Brewka, S.Coradeschi, A.Perini and P.Traverso, eds, Vol. 141, IOS Press, Amsterdam, 2006, pp. 725\u2013726."},{"key":"ref042","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/11853886_27"},{"key":"ref043","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2009.02.001"},{"key":"ref044","unstructured":"S.Modgil and H.Prakken, Reasoning about preferences in structured extended argumentation frameworks, in: 3rd International Conference on Computational Models of Argument, 2010, pp. 347\u2013358."},{"key":"ref045","unstructured":"S.Modgil and H.Prakken, Revisiting preferences and argumentation, in: International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2011, pp. 1021\u20131026."},{"key":"ref046","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2012.10.008"},{"key":"ref047","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"S.H.Nielsen and S.Parsons, A generalization of Dung\u2019s abstract framework for argumentation: Arguing with sets of attacking arguments, in: ArgMAS 2006, N.Maudet, S.Parsons and I.Rahwan, eds, LNAI, Vol. 4766, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, 2006, pp. 54\u201373.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-540-75526-5_4"},{"key":"ref048","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.future.2017.09.040"},{"key":"ref049","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-540-78915-4_5"},{"key":"ref050","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijar.2021.10.002"},{"key":"ref051","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s10472-015-9475-5"},{"key":"ref052","unstructured":"J.L.Pollock, Knowledge and Justification, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1974."},{"key":"ref053","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1207\/s15516709cog1104_4"},{"key":"ref054","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0004-3702(94)90057-4"},{"key":"ref055","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/19462160903564592"},{"key":"ref056","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/11663081.1997.10510900"},{"key":"ref057","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-540-75526-5_5"},{"key":"ref058","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijar.2015.07.001"},{"key":"ref059","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0004-3702(92)90069-A"},{"key":"ref060","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eswa.2015.06.048"},{"key":"ref061","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"F.H.van Eemeren, B.Garssen, E.C.W.Krabbe, A.F.S.Henkemans, B.Verheij and J.H.M.Wagemans, Handbook of Argumentation Theory, Springer Reference, Dordrecht, 2014.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-90-481-9473-5"},{"key":"ref062","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1023\/B:ARTI.0000046008.49443.36"},{"key":"ref063","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-016-9189-y"},{"key":"ref064","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0004-3702(96)00041-0"},{"key":"ref065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"D.N.Walton, Methods of Argumentation, Cambridge University Press, New York, 2013.","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9781139600187"},{"key":"ref066","unstructured":"D.N.Walton and D.Godden, The nature of critical questions in argumentation schemes, in: The Uses of Argument, D.Hitchcock, ed. Hamilton, ON, Canada, McMaster University, 2005, pp. 476\u2013484."},{"key":"ref067","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"D.N.Walton, C.Reed and F.Macagno, Argumentation Schemes, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2008.","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511802034"},{"key":"ref068","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eswa.2018.09.038"}],"container-title":["Argument &amp; Computation"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.3233\/AAC-220012","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.3233\/AAC-220012","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.3233\/AAC-220012","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,28]],"date-time":"2026-04-28T11:53:25Z","timestamp":1777377205000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/10.3233\/AAC-220012"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,25]]},"references-count":68,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,7,12]]}},"alternative-id":["10.3233\/AAC-220012"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3233\/aac-220012","relation":{},"ISSN":["1946-2166","1946-2174"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1946-2166","type":"print"},{"value":"1946-2174","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,25]]}}}