{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,29]],"date-time":"2026-01-29T17:53:31Z","timestamp":1769709211453,"version":"3.49.0"},"reference-count":30,"publisher":"SAGE Publications","issue":"3","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["IFS"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,8,24]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>The use of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) platforms has been increasing day by day and it has become an important technology. In this study, how the engines should be selected in the design of a rotary wing UAV system is considered a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) problem. This MCDM problem has not yet been encountered in the literature. Therefore, a hybrid MCDM approach based on the fuzzy Best Worst Method (BWM) and Multi Attributive Ideal-Real Comparative Analysis (MAIRCA) is proposed to solve this problem. In the proposed approach, the decision makers determine 6 criteria (KV value, thrust, weight, efficiency, battery, electronic speed controller (ESC)) and 6 different engine (A1, A2, A3, A4, A5, A6) alternatives. The fuzzy BWM was used to calculate the weights of criteria, while the MAIRCA was used for the selection of alternatives. According to the results obtained, the three most effective criteria were thrust, KV value, and weight, respectively. The three best engine options were found as A3, A1, and A6. Moreover, sensitivity analysis was performed to observe the change in the ranking of alternatives according to different weights of criteria. MABAC, MARCOS, and COPRAS methods were used to compare the alternative rankings found with the MAIRCA.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.3233\/jifs-231143","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2023,6,13]],"date-time":"2023-06-13T10:12:39Z","timestamp":1686651159000},"page":"3767-3778","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["A hybrid approach based on fuzzy BWM and MAIRCA for selection of engine in rotary wing unmanned aerial vehicle design"],"prefix":"10.1177","volume":"45","author":[{"given":"Bet\u00fcl","family":"Turano\u011flu \u015eirin","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Industrial Engineering, Atat\u00fcrk University, Erzurum, Turkey"}]}],"member":"179","reference":[{"key":"10.3233\/JIFS-231143_ref1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"316","DOI":"10.1016\/j.asoc.2017.05.036","article-title":"A novel approach for combination of individual and group decisionsbased on fuzzy best-worst method","volume":"59","author":"Hafezalkotob","year":"2017","journal-title":"Applied Soft Computing"},{"key":"10.3233\/JIFS-231143_ref2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"115196","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eswa.2021.115196","article-title":"A novel modified fuzzy best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method","volume":"181","author":"Mohtashami","year":"2021","journal-title":"Expert Systems with Applications"},{"key":"10.3233\/JIFS-231143_ref3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"160","DOI":"10.1016\/j.trd.2017.12.022","article-title":"A military airport location selection by AHP integrated PROMETHEE and VIKOR methods","volume":"59","author":"Sennaroglu","year":"2018","journal-title":"Transportation Research Part D"},{"key":"10.3233\/JIFS-231143_ref4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"120481","DOI":"10.1016\/j.energy.2021.120481","article-title":"Multi-criteria decision analysis of China\u2019s energy security from to based on Fuzzy BWM-DEA-AR model and Malmquist Productivity Index","volume":"228","author":"Huang","year":"2021","journal-title":"Energy"},{"key":"10.3233\/JIFS-231143_ref5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"100815","DOI":"10.1016\/j.esr.2022.100815","article-title":"Strategic supplier selection for renewable energy supply chain under green capabilities (fuzzy BWM-WASPAS-COPRAS approach)","volume":"40","author":"Masoomi","year":"2022","journal-title":"Energy Strategy Reviews"},{"key":"10.3233\/JIFS-231143_ref6","first-page":"89","article-title":"Selection of railway level crossings for investing in security equipment using hybrid DEMATEL-MAIRCA model,","author":"Pamu\u010dar","year":"2014","journal-title":"Proceedings of the XVIth International Scientific Expert Conference on Railway"},{"key":"10.3233\/JIFS-231143_ref7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"58","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eswa.2017.06.037","article-title":"Novel approach to group multi-criteria decision making based on interval rough numbers: hybrid DEMATELANP-MAIRCA model","volume":"88","author":"Pamu\u010dar","year":"2017","journal-title":"Expert Systems with Applications"},{"key":"10.3233\/JIFS-231143_ref8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"23027","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijhydene.2020.06.016","article-title":"Developing a novel fuzzy neutrosophic numbers based decision making analysis for prioritizing the energy storage technologies","volume":"45","author":"Pamu\u010dar","year":"2020","journal-title":"Int J of Hydrogen Energy"},{"key":"10.3233\/JIFS-231143_ref9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"101098","DOI":"10.1016\/j.seps.2021.101098","article-title":"An integrated rough group multicriteria decision-making model for the ex-ante prioritization of infrastructure projects: The Serbian Railways case","volume":"79","author":"Pamu\u010dar","year":"2022","journal-title":"Socio-Economic Planning Sciences"},{"key":"10.3233\/JIFS-231143_ref10","first-page":"175","article-title":"Evaluation of performance of deposit banks by Entropy and MAIRCA methods","volume":"22","author":"Ay\u010din","year":"2019","journal-title":"Bal\u0131kesir University the J of Social Sciences Inst"},{"key":"10.3233\/JIFS-231143_ref11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"4691","DOI":"10.1007\/s13762-021-03511-y","article-title":"Prioritizing of industrial wastewater management processes using an integrated AHP\u2013 CoCoSo model: comparative and sensitivity analyses","volume":"19","author":"Adar","year":"2022","journal-title":"Int J of Environmental Science and Technology"},{"key":"10.3233\/JIFS-231143_ref12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"121981","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclepro.2020.121981","article-title":"Sustainable supplier selection: A novel integrated fuzzy best worst method (F-BWM) and fuzzy CoCoSo with Bonferroni (CoCoSo\u2019B) multi-criteria model","volume":"266","author":"Ecer","year":"2020","journal-title":"Journal of Cleaner Production"},{"key":"10.3233\/JIFS-231143_ref13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"110916","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rser.2021.110916","article-title":"A consolidated MCDM framework for performance assessment of battery electric vehicles based on ranking strategies","volume":"143","author":"Ecer","year":"2021","journal-title":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews"},{"key":"10.3233\/JIFS-231143_ref14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"103402","DOI":"10.1016\/j.scs.2021.103402","article-title":"Assessment of sustainable urban development based on a hybrid decision-making approach: Group fuzzy BWM, AHP, and TOPSIS\u2013GIS","volume":"76","author":"Foroozesh","year":"2022","journal-title":"Sustainable Cities and Society"},{"key":"10.3233\/JIFS-231143_ref15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"9565","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eswa.2015.07.061","article-title":"An integrated fuzzy AHP and fuzzy MOORA approach to the problem of industrial engineering sector choosing","volume":"42","author":"Akkaya","year":"2015","journal-title":"Expert Systems with Applications"},{"key":"10.3233\/JIFS-231143_ref16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"657","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclepro.2019.05.308","article-title":"Hospital performance evaluation by a hesitant fuzzy linguistic best worst method with inconsistency repairing","volume":"2032","author":"Liao","year":"2019","journal-title":"Journal of Cleaner Production"},{"key":"10.3233\/JIFS-231143_ref17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"49","DOI":"10.1016\/j.omega.2014.11.009","article-title":"Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method","volume":"53","author":"Rezaei","year":"2015","journal-title":"Omega"},{"key":"10.3233\/JIFS-231143_ref18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1080","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ins.2020.09.014","article-title":"Fuzzy best-worst method based on triangular fuzzy numbers for multi-criteria decision-making","volume":"547","author":"Dong","year":"2021","journal-title":"Information Sciences"},{"key":"10.3233\/JIFS-231143_ref19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"101","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclepro.2018.02.186","article-title":"Evaluating the performance of suppliers based on using the R\u2019AMATEL-MAIRCA method for green supply chain implementation in electronics industry","volume":"184","author":"Chatterjee","year":"2018","journal-title":"Journal of Cleaner Production"},{"key":"10.3233\/JIFS-231143_ref20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.3390\/su8040372","article-title":"The combination of expert judgment and GIS-MAIRCA analysis for the selection of sites for ammunition depots","volume":"8","author":"Gigovi\u0107","year":"2016","journal-title":"Sustainability"},{"key":"10.3233\/JIFS-231143_ref21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1231","DOI":"10.1007\/s00477-020-01816-x","article-title":"Assessment of occupational risks from human health and environmental perspectives: a new integrated approach and its application using fuzzy BWM and fuzzy MAIRCA","volume":"34","author":"Gul","year":"2020","journal-title":"Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment"},{"key":"10.3233\/JIFS-231143_ref22","first-page":"1460","article-title":"A novel decision-making approach for light weight environment friendly material selection","volume":"22","author":"Chatterjee","year":"2020","journal-title":"Materials Today: Proceedings"},{"key":"10.3233\/JIFS-231143_ref23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"394","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ins.2019.06.049","article-title":"An integrated approach to green supplier selection based on the interval type-2 fuzzy best-worst and extended VIKOR methods","volume":"502","author":"Wu","year":"2019","journal-title":"Information Sciences"},{"key":"10.3233\/JIFS-231143_ref24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"23","DOI":"10.1016\/j.knosys.2017.01.010","article-title":"Fuzzy best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method and its applications","volume":"121","author":"Guo","year":"2017","journal-title":"Knowledge-Based Systems"},{"key":"10.3233\/JIFS-231143_ref25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"105505","DOI":"10.1016\/j.asoc.2019.105505","article-title":"An extended FMEA approach based on the Z-MOORA and fuzzy BWM for prioritization of failures","volume":"81","author":"Ghoushchi","year":"2019","journal-title":"Applied Soft Computing Journal"},{"key":"10.3233\/JIFS-231143_ref26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"119186","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclepro.2019.119186","article-title":"Sustainable landfill site selection for municipal solid waste based on a hybrid decision-making approach: Fuzzy group BWM-MULTIMOORA-GIS","volume":"248","author":"Rahimi","year":"2020","journal-title":"Journal of Cleaner Production"},{"key":"10.3233\/JIFS-231143_ref27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"104195","DOI":"10.1016\/j.engfailanal.2019.104195","article-title":"An integrated approach for fuzzy failure modes and effects analysis using fuzzy AHP and fuzzy MAIRCA","volume":"108","author":"Boral","year":"2020","journal-title":"Engineering Failure Analysis"},{"key":"10.3233\/JIFS-231143_ref28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"83","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cie.2019.05.004","article-title":"An integrated approach to multiple criteria decision making based on the average solution and normalized weights of criteria deduced by the hesitant fuzzy best worst method","volume":"133","author":"Mi","year":"2019","journal-title":"Computers & Industrial Engineering"},{"key":"10.3233\/JIFS-231143_ref29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"126759","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclepro.2021.126759","article-title":"A hybrid fuzzy BWM-VIKOR MCDM to evaluate the service level of bike-sharing companies: A case study from Chengdu, China","volume":"298","author":"Liang","year":"2021","journal-title":"Journal of Cleaner Production"},{"key":"10.3233\/JIFS-231143_ref30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"636","DOI":"10.1016\/j.asoc.2018.03.037","article-title":"An integrated approach for failure mode and effects analysis based on fuzzy best-worst, relative entropy, and VIKOR methods","volume":"72","author":"Tian","year":"2018","journal-title":"Applied Soft Computing"}],"container-title":["Journal of Intelligent &amp; Fuzzy Systems"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/content.iospress.com\/download?id=10.3233\/JIFS-231143","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,29]],"date-time":"2026-01-29T06:55:05Z","timestamp":1769669705000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/full\/10.3233\/JIFS-231143"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023,8,24]]},"references-count":30,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3"},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3233\/jifs-231143","relation":{},"ISSN":["1064-1246","1875-8967"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1064-1246","type":"print"},{"value":"1875-8967","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2023,8,24]]}}}