{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,4]],"date-time":"2026-05-04T10:34:33Z","timestamp":1777890873537,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":4,"publisher":"SAGE Publications","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2015,7,20]],"date-time":"2015-07-20T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1437350400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/page\/policies\/text-and-data-mining-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["journals.sagepub.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["NeuroRehabilitation: An International, Interdisciplinary Journal"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,7,20]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>Rehabilitation professionals provide valuable clinical services to persons who have sustained neurologic injuries and illnesses. Accurate diagnosis and treatment planning require that neurorehabilitation professionals base their decisions on true information and genuine patient performance. That is, the patient must have responded honestly to questions and put forth adequate effort on ability measures. When in possession of valid information about the patient\u2019s history, symptoms, and abilities levels, clinicians are well positioned to serve the patient. In contrast, inaccurate information and invalid functional presentations lead to misdiagnosis, unhelpful or potentially harmful interventions, and wasted resources. Ethically, consistent with the principles of beneficence and justice, clinicians have a responsibility to use the assessment measures and procedures that are needed to answer clinical questions and provide appropriate services, using and conserving valuable resources in the process. With validity assessment measures and procedures comprising an important part of clinical evaluations, a formal, structured approach to validity assessment promotes ethical practice. Interdisciplinary collaboration in validity assessment in neurorehabilitation contexts can often be more thorough and efficient than evaluations performed by a single discipline.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.3233\/nre-151227","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2015,7,26]],"date-time":"2015-07-26T09:16:46Z","timestamp":1437902206000},"page":"383-386","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/sage-journals-update-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"title":["The Assessment of Symptom and PerformanceValidity in           Neurorehabilitation"],"prefix":"10.1177","volume":"36","author":[{"given":"Shane S.","family":"Bush","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Long Island Neuropsychology, PC, Lake Ronkonkoma, NY, USA"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"179","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2015,7,20]]},"reference":[{"key":"r1","unstructured":"BushSS2009Symptom validity assessment practices: Ethical and professional considerations (Die praxis der beschwerdenvalidierung: Ethische und fachgesichtspunkte)MertenTDettenbornHDiagnostik der BeschwerdenvaliditatBerlin, GermanyDeutscher Psychologen Verlag79100Eds."},{"key":"r2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bush, S. S., Ruff, R. M., Tr\u00f6ster, A. I., Barth, J. T., Koffler, S. P.\n          Pliskin, N. H., Reynolds, C. R. & Silver, C. H. (2005). Symptom validity assessment:\n          Practice issues and medical necessity. Official position of the National Academy of\n          Neuropsychology.\n                      Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology\n                      , 20(4), 419-426.\n          German Translation by Thomas Merten, Ph.D. Bush, S. S., Ruff, A. M., Tr\u00f6ster, A. I.\n          Barth, J. T., Koffler, S. P., Pliskin, N. H., Reynolds, C. R. & Silver, C. H. (2006).\n          Diagnostik der Beschwerdenvalidit\u00e4t: Praktische Gesichtspunkte und medizinische\n          Erfordernisse.\n                      Neurologie & Rehabilitation, 12\n                      (2), 69-74. Reprinted\n          (2007) in\n                      Praxis der Rechtpsychologie, 17\n                      (1), 155-166","DOI":"10.1016\/j.acn.2005.02.002"},{"key":"r3","unstructured":"CaroneDABushSS2013Introduction: Historicalperspectives on mild traumatic brain injury, symptom validityassessment, and malingeringCaroneDABushSSMild traumatic brain injury: Symptom validity assessment and malingeringSpringer Publishing CompanyNew York129Eds."},{"key":"r4","unstructured":"GuilmetteTJ2013The role of clinical judgment in symptomvalidity assessmentCaroneDABushSSMild traumatic brain injury: System validity assessment andmalingeringSpringerNew York3143Eds."}],"container-title":["NeuroRehabilitation: An International, Interdisciplinary Journal"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.3233\/NRE-151227","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.3233\/NRE-151227","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.3233\/NRE-151227","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,1]],"date-time":"2026-05-01T05:48:05Z","timestamp":1777614485000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/full\/10.3233\/NRE-151227"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2015,7,20]]},"references-count":4,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,7,20]]}},"alternative-id":["10.3233\/NRE-151227"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3233\/nre-151227","relation":{},"ISSN":["1053-8135","1878-6448"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1053-8135","type":"print"},{"value":"1878-6448","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2015,7,20]]}}}