{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,10]],"date-time":"2026-10-10T15:01:24Z","timestamp":1791644484860,"version":"4.3.4"},"reference-count":67,"publisher":"SAGE Publications","issue":"6","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["THC"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,11,12]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>BACKGROUND: Surgical decompression is the intervention of choice for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) when non-operative treatment has failed. Apart from acute complications such as hematoma and infections, same-level recurrent lumbar stenosis and adjacent-segment disease (ASD) are factors that can occur after index lumbar spine surgery. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this retrospective case series was to evaluate the outcome of surgery and the odds of necessary revisions. METHODS: Patients who had undergone either decompressive lumbar laminotomy or laminotomy and spinal fusion due to lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) between 2000 and 2011 were included in this analysis. Demographic, perioperative and radiographic data were collected. Clinical outcome was evaluated using numeric rating scale (NRS), the symptom subscale of the adapted version of the german Spinal Stenosis Measure (SSM) and patient-sreported ability to walk. RESULTS: Within the LSS- cohort of 438 patients, 338 patients underwent decompression surgery only, while instrumentation in addition to decompression was performed in 100 cases (22.3%). 38 patients had prior spinal operations (decompression, disc herniation, fusion) either at our hospital or elsewhere. Thirty-five intraoperative complications were documented with dural tear with CSF leak being the most common (33\/35; 94.3%). Postoperative complications were defined as complications that needed surgery and differentiated between immediate postoperative complications (\u2a7d 3\u00a0weeks post operation) and complications that needed revisions surgery at a later date. Within all patients 51 revisions were classified as immediate complications of the index operation with infections, neurological deficits and hematoma being the most common. Within this group only 22 patients had fusion surgery in the first place, while 29 were treated by decompression. Revision surgery was indicated by 53 patients at a later date. While 4 patients decided against surgery, 49 revision surgeries were planned. 28 were performed at the same level, 10 at the same level plus an adjacent level, and 10 were executed at index level with indications of adjacent level spinal stenosis, adjacent level spinal stenosis plus instability and stand-alone instability. Pre- operative VAS score and ability to walk improved significantly in all patients. CONCLUSIONS: While looking for predictors of revision surgery due to re-stenosis, instability or same\/adjacent segment disease none of these were found. Within our cohort no significant differences concerning demographic, peri-operative and radiographic data of patients with or without revision wer noted. Patients, who needed revision surgery were older but slightly healthier while more likely to be male and smoking. Surprisingly, significant differences were noted regarding the distribution of intraoperative and early postoperative complications among the 6 main surgeons while these weren\u2019t obious within the intial index group of late revisions.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.3233\/thc-223389","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,6,21]],"date-time":"2022-06-21T13:52:35Z","timestamp":1655819555000},"page":"1423-1434","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":14,"title":["Lumbar spinal stenosis \u2013 surgical outcome and the odds of revision-surgery: Is it all due to the surgeon?"],"prefix":"10.1177","volume":"30","author":[{"given":"Carolin","family":"Melcher","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Spine Surgery and Scoliosis Center, Sch\u00f6n Klinik Neustadt, Neustadt, Germany"},{"name":"Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rehabilitation and Regenerative Medicine, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Alexander C.","family":"Paulus","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rehabilitation and Regenerative Medicine, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Bj\u00f6mrn P.","family":"Ro\u00dfbach","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Klinik St. Georg, Hamburg, Germany"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Mehmet F.","family":"G\u00fclecy\u00fcz","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rehabilitation and Regenerative Medicine, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Christof","family":"Birkenmaier","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rehabilitation and Regenerative Medicine, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Christoph von","family":"Schulze-Pellengahr","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Agaplesion Ev. Bathildiskrankenhaus Bad Pyrmont, Bad Pyrmont, Germany"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Wolfram","family":"Teske","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Katholisches Krankenhaus Hagen \u2013 St.-Josefs-Hospital, Hagen, Germany"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Bernd","family":"Wegener","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rehabilitation and Regenerative Medicine, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"179","reference":[{"issue":"384","key":"10.3233\/THC-223389_ref1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"137","DOI":"10.1097\/00003086-200103000-00016","article-title":"Lumbar stenosis: a clinical review","author":"Arbit","year":"2001","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res."},{"issue":"2","key":"10.3233\/THC-223389_ref2","first-page":"171","article-title":"Lumbar spinal stenosis","volume":"158","author":"Ciricillo","year":"1993","journal-title":"West J Med."},{"issue":"1","key":"10.3233\/THC-223389_ref3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"31","DOI":"10.1016\/S0033-8389(05)70262-1","article-title":"Imaging lumbar spinal stenosis","volume":"39","author":"Schonstrom","year":"2001","journal-title":"Radiol Clin North Am."},{"issue":"5","key":"10.3233\/THC-223389_ref4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"793","DOI":"10.3171\/jns.1996.85.5.0793","article-title":"Clinical outcomes and radiological instability following decompressive lumbar laminectomy for degenerative spinal stenosis: a comparison of patients undergoing concomitant arthrodesis versus decompression alone","volume":"85","author":"Fox","year":"1996","journal-title":"J Neurosurg."},{"issue":"2","key":"10.3233\/THC-223389_ref5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"166","DOI":"10.3171\/jns.1996.84.2.0166","article-title":"Treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis by extensive unilateral decompression and contralateral autologous bone fusion: operative technique and results","volume":"84","author":"diPierro","year":"1996","journal-title":"Journal of Neurosurgery."},{"key":"10.3233\/THC-223389_ref6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ahmet MM, Tufan C, Adem Y, Halit \u00c7, \u0130smail Y, Yunus A. Midterm outcome after a microsurgical unilateral approach for bilateral decompression of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine. 2012; 16(1): 68-76.","DOI":"10.3171\/2011.7.SPINE11222"},{"issue":"12","key":"10.3233\/THC-223389_ref7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2611","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-012-2424-7","article-title":"Prediction of long-term clinical outcome in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis","volume":"21","author":"Micankova Adamova","year":"2012","journal-title":"European Spine Journal: Official Publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society."},{"issue":"11","key":"10.3233\/THC-223389_ref8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1424","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-200006010-00016","article-title":"Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Conservative or Surgical Management: A Prospective 10-Year Study","volume":"25","author":"Amundsen","year":"2000","journal-title":"Spine."},{"issue":"10","key":"10.3233\/THC-223389_ref9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1094","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3181a105fc","article-title":"Surgery for Low Back Pain: A Review of the Evidence for an American Pain Society Clinical Practice Guideline","volume":"34","author":"Chou","year":"2009","journal-title":"Spine."},{"issue":"5","key":"10.3233\/THC-223389_ref10","first-page":"596","article-title":"Back pain improvement after decompression without fusion or stabilization in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and clinically significant preoperative back pain","volume":"25","author":"III","year":"2016","journal-title":"Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine."},{"issue":"14","key":"10.3233\/THC-223389_ref11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1250","DOI":"10.1212\/WNL.0000000000002000","article-title":"Evaluation of outcome measures for neurogenic claudication: A patient-centered approach","volume":"85","author":"Markman","year":"2015","journal-title":"Neurology."},{"issue":"8","key":"10.3233\/THC-223389_ref12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"818","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMcp0708097","article-title":"Clinical practice","volume":"358","author":"Katz","year":"2008","journal-title":"Lumbar spinal stenosis. The New England Journal of Medicine."},{"issue":"1","key":"10.3233\/THC-223389_ref13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"33","DOI":"10.1016\/S0025-6196(11)64662-4","article-title":"Analysis of early failures after lumbar decompressive laminectomy for spinal stenosis","volume":"70","author":"Deen","year":"1995","journal-title":"Mayo Clin Proc."},{"issue":"5","key":"10.3233\/THC-223389_ref14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"669","DOI":"10.3171\/jns.1992.77.5.0669","article-title":"Long-term evaluation of decompressive surgery for degenerative lumbar stenosis","volume":"77","author":"Caputy","year":"1992","journal-title":"J Neurosurg."},{"key":"10.3233\/THC-223389_ref15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"372","DOI":"10.2174\/1874325001105010372","article-title":"Prognosis of surgical treatment for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective cohort study of clinical outcomes and health-related quality of life across gender and age groups","volume":"5","author":"Thornes","year":"2011","journal-title":"Open Orthop J."},{"key":"10.3233\/THC-223389_ref16","first-page":"182","article-title":"Lumbar spinal stenosis: prognostic factors for bilateral microsurgical decompression using a unilateral approach","volume":"65","author":"Papavero","year":"2009","journal-title":"Neurosurgery."},{"issue":"7","key":"10.3233\/THC-223389_ref17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"531","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e31827c99f0","article-title":"Risk for Adjacent Segment and Same Segment Reoperation After Surgery for Lumbar Stenosis: A subgroup analysis of the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT)","volume":"38","author":"Radcliff","year":"2013","journal-title":"Spine."},{"issue":"2","key":"10.3233\/THC-223389_ref18","first-page":"139","article-title":"Revision lumbar surgery in elderly patients with symptomatic pseudarthrosis, adjacent-segment disease, or same-level recurrent stenosis","volume":"18","author":"Owoicho","year":"2013","journal-title":"Part 1. Two-year outcomes and clinical efficacy. Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.3233\/THC-223389_ref19","first-page":"504","article-title":"Biomechanical evaluation of destabilization following minimally invasive decompression for lumbar spinal canal stenosis","volume":"18","author":"Kazuhiro","year":"2013","journal-title":"Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine."},{"issue":"7","key":"10.3233\/THC-223389_ref20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"353","DOI":"10.1097\/BSD.0b013e31826105a5","article-title":"Long-term outcomes after revision neural decompression and fusion for same-level recurrent lumbar stenosis: defining the effectiveness of surgery","volume":"27","author":"Mendenhall","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Spinal Disord Tech."},{"issue":"14","key":"10.3233\/THC-223389_ref21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1329","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3181e0f04d","article-title":"Surgical Versus Nonoperative Treatment for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Four-Year Results of the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial","volume":"35","author":"Weinstein","year":"2010","journal-title":"Spine."},{"issue":"19","key":"10.3233\/THC-223389_ref22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2119","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e318145a56a","article-title":"Are Lumbar Spine Reoperation Rates Falling With Greater Use of Fusion Surgery and New Surgical Technology","volume":"32","author":"Martin","year":"2007","journal-title":"Spine."},{"issue":"5","key":"10.3233\/THC-223389_ref23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"392","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0040-1709164","article-title":"Comparison of Reoperation after Fusion and after Decompression for Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Single-Center Experience of 987 Cases","volume":"81","author":"Kim","year":"2020","journal-title":"J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg."},{"issue":"6","key":"10.3233\/THC-223389_ref24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"578","DOI":"10.4103\/ortho.IJOrtho_380_17","article-title":"Reoperations Following Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis","volume":"52","author":"Goel","year":"2018","journal-title":"Indian J Orthop."},{"issue":"7","key":"10.3233\/THC-223389_ref25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"613","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2011.03.008","article-title":"Predictive factors influencing clinical outcome with operative management of lumbar spinal stenosis","volume":"11","author":"Athiviraham","year":"2011","journal-title":"Spine J."},{"issue":"21","key":"10.3233\/THC-223389_ref26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2229","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-199911010-00010","article-title":"Predictors of surgical outcome in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis","volume":"24","author":"Katz","year":"1999","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"issue":"14","key":"10.3233\/THC-223389_ref27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1605","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3181791af3","article-title":"Reliability of readings of magnetic resonance imaging features of lumbar spinal stenosis","volume":"33","author":"Lurie","year":"2008","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.3233\/THC-223389_ref28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1174","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-010-1652-y","article-title":"Long-term results of surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomised controlled trial","volume":"20","author":"Sl\u00e4tis","year":"2011","journal-title":"European spine journal: official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society."},{"key":"10.3233\/THC-223389_ref29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Zaina F, Tomkins-Lane C, Carragee E, Negrini S. Surgical versus non-surgical treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2016(1).","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD010264.pub2"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.3233\/THC-223389_ref30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"695","DOI":"10.1007\/s00590-016-1818-3","article-title":"Surgical and nonsurgical treatments for lumbar spinal stenosis","volume":"26","author":"Inoue","year":"2016","journal-title":"European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology."},{"issue":"8","key":"10.3233\/THC-223389_ref31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"936","DOI":"10.1097\/01.brs.0000158953.57966.c0","article-title":"Long-Term Outcomes of Surgical and Nonsurgical Management of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: 8 to 10 Year Results from the Maine Lumbar Spine Study","volume":"30","author":"Atlas","year":"2005","journal-title":"Spine."},{"issue":"8","key":"10.3233\/THC-223389_ref32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"794","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa0707136","article-title":"Surgical versus Nonsurgical Therapy for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis","volume":"358","author":"Weinstein","year":"2008","journal-title":"New England Journal of Medicine."},{"issue":"5","key":"10.3233\/THC-223389_ref33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"701","DOI":"10.1093\/neuros\/nyw162","article-title":"Lumbar Fusion for Degenerative Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","volume":"80","author":"Yavin","year":"2017","journal-title":"Neurosurgery."},{"key":"10.3233\/THC-223389_ref34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ulrich N, Burgstaller JM, Pichierri G, Wertli MM, Farshad M, Porchet F, Steurer J, Held U. Decompression Surgery Alone Versus Decompression Plus Fusion in Symptomatic Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Swiss Prospective Multi-center Cohort Study with 3 Years of Follow-up. Spine. 2017 Jan(13).","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.07.245"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.3233\/THC-223389_ref35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"659","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-004-0851-9","article-title":"Spinal stenosis re-operation rate in Sweden is 11% at 10\u00a0years\u00a0\u2013 A national analysis of 9,664 operations","volume":"14","author":"Jansson","year":"2005","journal-title":"European Spine Journal."},{"issue":"5","key":"10.3233\/THC-223389_ref36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"669","DOI":"10.3171\/jns.1992.77.5.0669","article-title":"Long-term evaluation of decompressive surgery for degenerative lumbar stenosis","volume":"77","author":"Caputy","year":"1992","journal-title":"Journal of neurosurgery."},{"issue":"3","key":"10.3233\/THC-223389_ref37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"235","DOI":"10.3944\/AOTT.2010.2278","article-title":"Prospective analysis of surgical outcomes in patients undergoing decompressive laminectomy and posterior instrumentation for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis","volume":"44","author":"Gelalis","year":"2010","journal-title":"Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc."},{"issue":"2","key":"10.3233\/THC-223389_ref38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"381","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-014-3479-4","article-title":"Reoperation rates after fenestration for lumbar spinal canal stenosis: a 20-year period survival function method analysis","volume":"24","author":"Aizawa","year":"2015","journal-title":"European Spine Journal."},{"issue":"21","key":"10.3233\/THC-223389_ref39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1979","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.J.01292","article-title":"Revision Surgery Following Operations for Lumbar Stenosis","volume":"93","author":"Deyo","year":"2011","journal-title":"The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery American Volume."},{"issue":"13","key":"10.3233\/THC-223389_ref40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1259","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2010.338","article-title":"Trends, major medical complications, and charges associated with surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis in older adults","volume":"303","author":"Deyo","year":"2010","journal-title":"JAMA."},{"issue":"4","key":"10.3233\/THC-223389_ref41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"E9","DOI":"10.3171\/2015.7.FOCUS15259","article-title":"Iatrogenic spondylolisthesis following laminectomy for degenerative lumbar stenosis: systematic review and current concepts","volume":"39","author":"Guha","year":"2015","journal-title":"Neurosurgical Focus."},{"issue":"15","key":"10.3233\/THC-223389_ref42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1624","DOI":"10.1097\/01.BRS.0000132650.24437.15","article-title":"Effect of facetectomy on lumbar spinal stability under sagittal plane loadings","volume":"29","author":"Lee","year":"2004","journal-title":"Spine."},{"issue":"4","key":"10.3233\/THC-223389_ref43","first-page":"339","article-title":"Minimally invasive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis in patients with and without preoperative spondylolisthesis: clinical outcome and reoperation rates","volume":"22","author":"Alimi","year":"2015","journal-title":"Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine."},{"issue":"2","key":"10.3233\/THC-223389_ref44","first-page":"129","article-title":"Outcome after less-invasive decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized comparison of unilateral laminotomy, bilateral laminotomy, and laminectomy","volume":"3","author":"Claudius","year":"2005","journal-title":"Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine."},{"issue":"suppl_2","key":"10.3233\/THC-223389_ref45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S2-146","DOI":"10.1097\/00006123-200211002-00020","article-title":"Microendoscopic decompressive laminotomy for the treatment of lumbar stenosis","volume":"51","author":"Khoo","year":"2002","journal-title":"Neurosurgery."},{"key":"10.3233\/THC-223389_ref46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Parikh K, Tomasino A, Knopman J, Boockvar J, H\u00e4rtl R. Operative results and learning curve: microscope-assisted tubular microsurgery for 1-and 2-level discectomies and laminectomies. 2008.","DOI":"10.3171\/FOC\/2008\/25\/8\/E14"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.3233\/THC-223389_ref47","first-page":"305","article-title":"Lumbar spinal stenosis in elderly patients: is a unilateral microsurgical approach sufficient for decompression","volume":"14","author":"Matthias","year":"2011","journal-title":"Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine."},{"issue":"5","key":"10.3233\/THC-223389_ref48","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"825","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-011-2101-2","article-title":"Dural lesions in decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: incidence, risk factors and effect on outcome","volume":"21","author":"Str\u00f6mqvist","year":"2012","journal-title":"European spine journal: official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society."},{"issue":"10","key":"10.3233\/THC-223389_ref49","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2504","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-016-4571-8","article-title":"The effect of incidental dural lesions on outcome after decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: results of a multi-center study with 800 patients","volume":"26","author":"Kothe","year":"2017","journal-title":"Eur Spine J."},{"issue":"10","key":"10.3233\/THC-223389_ref50","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2483","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-017-5197-1","article-title":"Incidental durotomy in decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: incidence, risk factors and effect on outcomes in the Spine Tango registry","volume":"26","author":"Herren","year":"2017","journal-title":"Eur Spine J."},{"key":"10.3233\/THC-223389_ref51","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"170","DOI":"10.1186\/s12891-016-1022-y","article-title":"The impact of incidental durotomy on the outcome of decompression surgery in degenerative lumbar spinal canal stenosis: analysis of the Lumbar Spinal Outcome Study (LSOS) data\u2013a Swiss prospective multi-center cohort study","volume":"17","author":"Ulrich","year":"2016","journal-title":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders."},{"issue":"2","key":"10.3233\/THC-223389_ref52","first-page":"202","article-title":"Incidence of postoperative symptomatic epidural hematoma in spinal decompression surgery","volume":"15","author":"Hiroyuki","year":"2011","journal-title":"Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine."},{"issue":"7","key":"10.3233\/THC-223389_ref53","first-page":"1081","article-title":"Dressings and drains in posterior spine surgery and their effect on wound complications","volume":"22","author":"Andrew Glennie","year":"2015","journal-title":"Journal of Clinical \u00ef\u00bc\u00aeeuroscience: Official Journal of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia."},{"issue":"3","key":"10.3233\/THC-223389_ref54","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"708","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-015-3790-8","article-title":"Use of closed suction devices and other drains in spinal surgery: results of an online, Germany-wide questionnaire","volume":"25","author":"von Eckardstein","year":"2016","journal-title":"Eur Spine J."},{"issue":"6","key":"10.3233\/THC-223389_ref55","first-page":"404","article-title":"To drain or not drain: literature versus practice","volume":"43","author":"Chandratreya","year":"1998","journal-title":"Journal of the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh."},{"issue":"4","key":"10.3233\/THC-223389_ref56","first-page":"Cd001825","article-title":"Closed suction surgical wound drainage after orthopaedic surgery","author":"Parker","year":"2001","journal-title":"The Cochrane database of systematic reviews."},{"issue":"6","key":"10.3233\/THC-223389_ref57","first-page":"606","article-title":"Predictors of unplanned readmission in patients undergoing lumbar decompression: multi-institutional analysis of 7016 patients","volume":"20","author":"Bobby","year":"2014","journal-title":"Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine"},{"issue":"26","key":"10.3233\/THC-223389_ref58","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2287","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000000068","article-title":"Reoperation and revision rates of 3 surgical treatment methods for lumbar stenosis associated with degenerative scoliosis and spondylolisthesis","volume":"38","author":"Brodke","year":"2013","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"issue":"19","key":"10.3233\/THC-223389_ref59","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"E981","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3181c46fb4","article-title":"Success and failure of minimally invasive decompression for focal lumbar spinal stenosis in patients with and without deformity","volume":"35","author":"Kelleher","year":"2010","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"key":"10.3233\/THC-223389_ref60","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Schar RT, Kiebach S, Raabe A, Ulrich CT. Reoperation Rate After Microsurgical Uni- or Bilateral Laminotomy for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis with and Without Low-Grade Spondylolisthesis: What do Preoperative Radiographic Parameters Tell Us? Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018.","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000002798"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.3233\/THC-223389_ref61","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1536","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2015.02.009","article-title":"Reoperation rate and risk factors of elective spinal surgery for degenerative spondylolisthesis: minimum 5-year follow-up","volume":"15","author":"Sato","year":"2015","journal-title":"Spine J."},{"issue":"8","key":"10.3233\/THC-223389_ref62","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"957","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-199208000-00015","article-title":"Revision surgery for failed back surgery syndrome","volume":"17","author":"Kim","year":"1992","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.3233\/THC-223389_ref63","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"230","DOI":"10.1097\/01.brs.0000251918.19508.b3","article-title":"Risk factors for the development of perioperative complications in elderly patients undergoing lumbar decompression and arthrodesis for spinal stenosis: an analysis of 166 patients","volume":"32","author":"Cassinelli","year":"2007","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.3233\/THC-223389_ref64","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"139","DOI":"10.3171\/2012.11.SPINE12224","article-title":"Revision lumbar surgery in elderly patients with symptomatic pseudarthrosis, adjacent-segment disease, or same-level recurrent stenosis. Part 1. Two-year outcomes and clinical efficacy: clinical article","volume":"18","author":"Adogwa","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"issue":"8","key":"10.3233\/THC-223389_ref65","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"970","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-199604150-00013","article-title":"Lumbar motion segment pathology adjacent to thoracolumbar, lumbar, and lumbosacral fusions","volume":"21","author":"Schlegel","year":"1996","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.3233\/THC-223389_ref66","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"637","DOI":"10.1007\/s00402-017-2685-z","article-title":"Effectiveness of decompression alone versus decompression plus fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"137","author":"Chang","year":"2017","journal-title":"Arch Orthop Trauma Surg."},{"issue":"2","key":"10.3233\/THC-223389_ref67","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"404","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-016-4683-1","article-title":"The effectiveness of decompression alone compared with additional fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis: a pragmatic comparative non-inferiority observational study from the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery","volume":"26","author":"Austevoll","year":"2017","journal-title":"Eur Spine J."}],"container-title":["Technology and Health Care"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/content.iospress.com\/download?id=10.3233\/THC-223389","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,1]],"date-time":"2026-05-01T05:56:44Z","timestamp":1777615004000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/full\/10.3233\/THC-223389"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,11,12]]},"references-count":67,"journal-issue":{"issue":"6"},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3233\/thc-223389","relation":{},"ISSN":["0928-7329","1878-7401"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0928-7329","type":"print"},{"value":"1878-7401","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,11,12]]}}}