{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,10]],"date-time":"2026-02-10T19:50:32Z","timestamp":1770753032614,"version":"3.50.0"},"reference-count":39,"publisher":"National Institute for Health and Care Research","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,1]],"date-time":"2025-07-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1751328000000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100000664","name":"Health Technology Assessment programme","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["NIHR128991"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["NIHR128991"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100000664","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Health Technol Assess"],"abstract":"\n Background<\/jats:title>\n Laparoscopic hysterectomies performed for benign gynaecological conditions are increasing. However, there is a lack of up-to-date evidence on their surgical outcomes when compared with abdominal hysterectomy. The LAparoscopic Versus Abdominal hysterectomy trial aimed to address this gap. A qualitative process evaluation was embedded within the pilot phase of the LAparoscopic Versus Abdominal hysterectomy trial.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Objective<\/jats:title>\n To explore the feasibility, acceptability and appropriateness of LAparoscopic Versus Abdominal hysterectomy for women and healthcare professionals.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Design and methods<\/jats:title>\n A qualitative process evaluation using semistructured interviews informed by the Medical Research Council\/National Institute for Health and Care Research updated Framework for Developing and Evaluating Complex Interventions. Interviews were thematically analysed to inform the development of a LAparoscopic Versus Abdominal hysterectomy trial programme theory (used to demonstrate how an intervention is expected to lead to its effects, under what conditions and for which stakeholders).<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Setting and participants<\/jats:title>\n Eligible women and healthcare professionals (gynaecologists, research nurses and research midwives) from participating clinical sites in National Health Service England.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Main outcome measures<\/jats:title>\n Insight on the feasibility,acceptability and appropriateness of LAparoscopic Versus Abdominal hysterectomy related to the: (1) environment, (2) patient and (3) the healthcare professionals.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Results<\/jats:title>\n \n Eleven women and 7 healthcare professionals (6 research nurses and 1 consultant gynaecologist) were interviewed. Four themes were interpreted. Theme 1 identified\n decision-making processes<\/jats:bold>\n for LAparoscopic Versus Abdominal hysterectomy participation.\n Conditional altruism<\/jats:italic>\n motivated women to participate, alongside the \u2018relief\u2019 of being offered a hysterectomy. The decision to decline participation was influenced by surgical preference and beliefs of laparoscopy having a faster recovery rate. Theme 2 highlighted\n surgical preferences<\/jats:bold>\n , with women\u2019s preferences being influenced by their previous experiences of surgery or perceived recovery times and family\/friends. All healthcare professionals demonstrated\n community equipoise<\/jats:italic>\n but did observe that \u2018younger surgeons\u2019 may prefer laparoscopic surgery based on their contemporary training. Theme 3 identified\n attitudes towards the LAparoscopic Versus Abdominal hysterectomy trial<\/jats:bold>\n , with women and healthcare professionals reporting positively about LAparoscopic Versus Abdominal hysterectomy\u2019s feasibility, acceptability and appropriateness in terms of burden, information and understanding of the study. Theme 4 identified the\n facilitators and barriers<\/jats:bold>\n for LAparoscopic Versus Abdominal hysterectomy participation. Facilitators included the key role of the research nurses and women having personal social support during their recovery. Telephone consultations may be a barrier, with face-to-face discussion being preferred by both women and healthcare professionals. These findings informed the refinement of the LAparoscopic Versus Abdominal hysterectomy programme theory, identifying the interplay of factors related to the environment, patient and healthcare professionals.\n <\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Limitations<\/jats:title>\n The majority of insight from women was gathered from one site (72.7%), and the majority of healthcare professionals\u2019 insight was obtained from research nurses (85.7%). Only English-speaking participants were recruited into LAparoscopic Versus Abdominal hysterectomy.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n Overall, LAparoscopic Versus Abdominal hysterectomy was acceptable for women and healthcare professionals. The trial, however, closed early due to the negative impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and lack of healthcare professional equipoise (these findings were published previously). The qualitative process evaluation highlighted additional factors to consider for future trials, including influences on women\u2019s decision-making and the challenges of addressing patient and healthcare professional equipoise.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Future work<\/jats:title>\n Comparison of laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy outcomes still need to be explored in a large-scale randomised controlled trial. Further qualitative insight is needed from women who decline participation and from healthcare professionals who lack equipoise.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Funding<\/jats:title>\n This article presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme as award number NIHR128991.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.3310\/gjtc1325","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,25]],"date-time":"2025-03-25T06:14:23Z","timestamp":1742883263000},"page":"1-21","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3310\/crossmarkpolicy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Feasibility, acceptability and appropriateness of laparoscopic versus abdominal hysterectomy for women and healthcare professionals: the LAVA trial qualitative process evaluation"],"prefix":"10.3310","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-5760-1080","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Lynsay","family":"Matthews","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"School of Health and Life Sciences, University of the West of Scotland, Paisley, UK"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-5943-1062","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"T Justin","family":"Clark","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Birmingham Women\u2019s and Children\u2019s Hospital, Birmingham, UK"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-0389-4412","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Sheriden","family":"Bevan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-4621-1922","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Lee","family":"Middleton","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-4893-0576","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Lina","family":"Antoun","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Birmingham Women\u2019s and Children\u2019s Hospital, Birmingham, UK"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-1430-5732","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Paul","family":"Smith","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Birmingham Women\u2019s and Children\u2019s Hospital, Birmingham, UK"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-9736-4107","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Ertan","family":"Saridogan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women\u2019s Health, University College London and University College London Hospital, London, UK"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-5119-1431","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Rebecca","family":"Woolley","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0008-7172-9604","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Monique","family":"Morgan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-4018-3855","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Laura L","family":"Jones","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Applied Health Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"6221","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,7]]},"reference":[{"key":"key2026021020432800_ref2-bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1156","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181c33c72","article-title":"ACOG Committee Opinion No. 444: choosing the route of hysterectomy for benign disease","volume":"114","author":"American College of Obestrics and Gynaecology","year":"2009","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"key2026021020432800_ref3-bib3","article-title":"Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease","volume":"2015","author":"Aarts","year":"3677","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"key2026021020432800_ref4-bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"795","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.15539","article-title":"Route of hysterectomy: a retrospective, cohort study in English NHS Hospitals from 2011 to 2017","volume":"126","author":"Madhvani","year":"2019","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"key2026021020432800_ref5-bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"377","DOI":"10.52054\/FVVO.13.4.039","article-title":"Short stay laparoscopic hysterectomy: an evaluation of feasibility and patient satisfaction","volume":"13","author":"Antoun","year":"2021","journal-title":"Facts Views Vis Obgyn"},{"key":"key2026021020432800_ref6-bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1307694","DOI":"10.3389\/fonc.2023.1307694","article-title":"Factors influencing same-day discharge after minimally invasive hysterectomy for malignant and non-malignant gynecological diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"13","author":"Liu","year":"2023","journal-title":"Front Oncol"},{"key":"key2026021020432800_ref7-bib7","article-title":"Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease","volume":"8","author":"Pickett","year":"2023","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"key2026021020432800_ref8-bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"558","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2014.01.006","article-title":"Urinary tract injuries in laparoscopic hysterectomy: a systematic review","volume":"21","author":"Adelman","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"key":"key2026021020432800_ref9-bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"110","DOI":"10.1111\/ajo.12802","article-title":"Improved laparoscopic skills in gynaecology trainees following a simulation-training program using take-home box trainers","volume":"59","author":"Wilson","year":"2019","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"key2026021020432800_ref10-bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"234","DOI":"10.3109\/01443615.2015.1060199","article-title":"Laparoscopic simulation training in gynaecology: current provision and staff attitudes \u2013 a cross-sectional survey","volume":"36","author":"Burden","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"key2026021020432800_ref11-bib11","article-title":"Virtual reality training for surgical trainees in laparoscopic surgery","volume":"2013","author":"Nagendran","year":"2013","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"key2026021020432800_ref12-bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"167","DOI":"10.17294\/2330-0698.1581","article-title":"Identifying what matters to hysterectomy patients: postsurgery perceptions, beliefs, and experiences","volume":"5","author":"Bossick","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Patient Cent Res Rev"},{"key":"key2026021020432800_ref13-bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S39","DOI":"10.1089\/152460900318759","article-title":"Decision making, beliefs, and attitudes toward hysterectomy: a focus group study with medically underserved women in Texas","volume":"9","author":"Groff","year":"2000","journal-title":"J Womens Health Gend Based Med"},{"key":"key2026021020432800_ref14-bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"40","DOI":"10.1186\/s12905-022-01615-2","article-title":"Women\u2019s interdependence after hysterectomy: a qualitative study based on Roy adaptation model","volume":"22","author":"Goudarzi","year":"2022","journal-title":"BMC Womens Health"},{"key":"key2026021020432800_ref15-bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"435","DOI":"10.1002\/nop2.1348","article-title":"The real experience with women\u2019s hysterectomy: a meta-synthesis of qualitative research evidence","volume":"10","author":"Li","year":"2022","journal-title":"Nursing Open"},{"key":"key2026021020432800_ref16-bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"681","DOI":"10.1177\/0272989X07307270","article-title":"Communicating the uncertainty of harms and benefits of medical interventions","volume":"27","author":"Politi","year":"2007","journal-title":"Med Decis Making"},{"key":"key2026021020432800_ref17-bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"469","DOI":"10.1016\/j.surg.2005.08.014","article-title":"A systematic review of reasons for nonentry of eligible patients into surgical randomized controlled trials","volume":"139","author":"Abraham","year":"2006","journal-title":"Surgery"},{"key":"key2026021020432800_ref18-bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"311","DOI":"10.1186\/s12875-022-01898-2","article-title":"Clinical trial recruitment in primary care: exploratory factor analysis of a questionnaire to measure barriers and facilitators to primary care providers\u2019 involvement","volume":"23","author":"Millar","year":"2022","journal-title":"BMC Prim Care"},{"key":"key2026021020432800_ref19-bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"112961","DOI":"10.1016\/j.socscimed.2020.112961","article-title":"A mixed-methods systematic review of patients\u2019 experience of being invited to participate in surgical randomised controlled trials","volume":"253","author":"Phelps","year":"2020","journal-title":"Soc Sci Med"},{"key":"key2026021020432800_ref20-bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"443","DOI":"10.1177\/1556264620914463","article-title":"Self-interested and altruistic motivations in volunteering for clinical trials: a more complex relationship","volume":"15","author":"Olsen","year":"2020","journal-title":"J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics"},{"key":"key2026021020432800_ref21-bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"198","DOI":"10.1186\/s12905-020-01065-8","article-title":"Bridging different realities \u2013 a qualitative study on patients\u2019 experiences of preoperative care for benign hysterectomy and opportunistic salpingectomy in Sweden","volume":"20","author":"Collins","year":"2020","journal-title":"BMC Womens Health"},{"key":"key2026021020432800_ref22-bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"389","DOI":"10.1186\/1745-6215-14-389","article-title":"Reflecting on the methodological challenges of recruiting to a United Kingdom-wide, multi-centre, randomised controlled trial in gynaecology outpatient settings","volume":"14","author":"Dickson","year":"2013","journal-title":"Trials"},{"key":"key2026021020432800_ref23-bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e070218","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2022-070218","article-title":"LAparoscopic Versus Abdominal hysterectomy (LAVA): protocol of a randomised controlled trial","volume":"13","author":"Antoun","year":"2023","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"key":"key2026021020432800_ref24-bib24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"n2061","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.n2061","article-title":"A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: update of Medical Research Council guidance","volume":"374","author":"Skivington","year":"2021","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"key2026021020432800_ref25-bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"88","DOI":"10.1186\/s12913-017-2031-8","article-title":"Acceptability of healthcare interventions: an overview of reviews and development of a theoretical framework","volume":"17","author":"Sekhon","year":"2017","journal-title":"BMC Health Serv Res"},{"key":"key2026021020432800_ref27-bib27","volume-title":"Successful Qualitative Research: A Practical Guide for Beginners","author":"Braun","year":"2013"},{"key":"key2026021020432800_ref28-bib28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1753","DOI":"10.1177\/1049732315617444","article-title":"Sample size in qualitative interview studies: guided by information power","volume":"26","author":"Malterud","year":"2016","journal-title":"Qual Health Res"},{"key":"key2026021020432800_ref29-bib29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"589","DOI":"10.1080\/2159676X.2019.1628806","article-title":"Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis","volume":"11","author":"Braun","year":"2019","journal-title":"Qual Res Sport Exerc Health"},{"key":"key2026021020432800_ref30-bib30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"35","DOI":"10.52054\/FVVO.16.1.003","article-title":"Lessons learnt from the multi-centre LAparoscopic Versus Abdominal hysterectomy (LAVA) randomised controlled trial","volume":"16","author":"Antoun","year":"2024","journal-title":"Facts Views Vis Obgyn"},{"key":"key2026021020432800_ref31-bib31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"31","DOI":"10.1186\/1745-6215-11-31","article-title":"Reasons for participating in randomised controlled trials: conditional altruism and considerations for self","volume":"11","author":"McCann","year":"2010","journal-title":"Trials"},{"key":"key2026021020432800_ref32-bib32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"9","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-018-3784-2","article-title":"Should I stay or should I go? A qualitative study exploring participation in a urology clinical trial","volume":"30","author":"Lie","year":"2019","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"key2026021020432800_ref33-bib33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"969","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-012-1967-9","article-title":"Why don\u2019t women participate? A qualitative study on non-participation in a surgical randomised controlled trial","volume":"24","author":"Gopinath","year":"2013","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"key2026021020432800_ref34-bib34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"284","DOI":"10.1186\/s13063-019-3385-5","article-title":"Barriers to recruitment when conducting a commissioned randomised controlled trial of medication versus psychological therapy for generalised anxiety disorder: some lessons learned","volume":"20","author":"Kalpakidou","year":"2019","journal-title":"Trials"},{"key":"key2026021020432800_ref35-bib35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"912","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2014.03.010","article-title":"The intellectual challenges and emotional consequences of equipoise contributed to the fragility of recruitment in six randomized controlled trials","volume":"67","author":"Donovan","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Clin Epidemiol"},{"key":"key2026021020432800_ref36-bib36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"678","DOI":"10.1186\/s13063-021-05403-5","article-title":"The challenge of equipoise in trials with a surgical and non-surgical comparison: a qualitative synthesis using meta-ethnography","volume":"22","author":"Davies","year":"2021","journal-title":"Trials"},{"key":"key2026021020432800_ref37-bib37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e000496","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2011-000496","article-title":"Improving the recruitment activity of clinicians in randomised controlled trials: a systematic review","volume":"2","author":"Fletcher","year":"2012","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"key":"key2026021020432800_ref38-bib38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1923","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pec.2016.07.026","article-title":"Patient empowerment, patient participation and patient-centeredness in hospital care: a concept analysis based on a literature review","volume":"99","author":"Castro","year":"2016","journal-title":"Patient Educ Couns"},{"key":"key2026021020432800_ref39-bib39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e123","DOI":"10.1017\/cts.2022.456","article-title":"Development and evaluation of a novel training program to build study staff skills in equitable and inclusive engagement, recruitment, and retention of clinical research participants","volume":"6","author":"Cranfill","year":"2022","journal-title":"J Clin Transl Sci"},{"key":"key2026021020432800_ref40-bib40","volume-title":"Good Practice Guide: Inclusive Language","author":"Chatfield","year":"2024"},{"key":"key2026021020432800_ref41-bib41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"226","DOI":"10.1177\/1740774520988669","article-title":"An ethics framework for consolidating and prioritizing COVID-19 clinical trials","volume":"18","author":"Meyer","year":"2021","journal-title":"Clin Trials"}],"container-title":["Health Technology Assessment"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/njl-admin.nihr.ac.uk\/document\/download\/2048440","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk\/sites\/journalslibrary\/files\/journal_data\/GJTC1325\/GJTC1325.xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/njl-admin.nihr.ac.uk\/document\/download\/2048440","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,10]],"date-time":"2026-02-10T15:23:11Z","timestamp":1770736991000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk\/hta\/published-articles\/GJTC1325"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,7]]},"references-count":39,"alternative-id":["10.3310\/GJTC1325"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3310\/gjtc1325","relation":{},"ISSN":["2046-4924"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2046-4924","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,7]]},"assertion":[{"value":"This content has been made freely available to all.","name":"free","label":"Free to read"},{"value":"07-2020","name":"contractual_start_date","label":"contractual_start_date","group":{"name":"article_history","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"06-2024","name":"editorial_review_begun","label":"editorial review begun","group":{"name":"article_history","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"03-2025","name":"accepted_for_publication","label":"Accepted for publication","group":{"name":"article_history","label":"Article History"}}]}}