{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,24]],"date-time":"2026-09-24T02:51:27Z","timestamp":1790218287009,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":122,"publisher":"National Institute for Health and Care Research","issue":"13","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,3,1]],"date-time":"2020-03-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1583020800000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.nationalarchives.gov.uk\/doc\/non-commercial-government-licence\/non-commercial-government-licence.htm"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100000664","name":"Health Technology Assessment programme","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["15\/141\/06"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["15\/141\/06"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100000664","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Health Technol Assess"],"abstract":"<jats:sec id=\"abs1-1\"><jats:title>Background<\/jats:title><jats:p>New surgical approaches for apical prolapse have gradually been introduced, with few prospective randomised controlled trial data to evaluate their safety and efficacy compared with traditional methods.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec id=\"abs1-2\"><jats:title>Objective<\/jats:title><jats:p>To compare surgical uterine preservation with vaginal hysterectomy in women with uterine prolapse and abdominal procedures with vaginal procedures in women with vault prolapse in terms of clinical effectiveness, adverse events, quality of life and cost-effectiveness.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec id=\"abs1-3\"><jats:title>Design<\/jats:title><jats:p>Two parallel randomised controlled trials (i.e. Uterine and Vault). Allocation was by remote web-based randomisation (1\u2009:\u20091 ratio), minimised on the need for concomitant anterior and\/or posterior procedure, concomitant incontinence procedure, age and surgeon.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec id=\"abs1-4\"><jats:title>Setting<\/jats:title><jats:p>UK hospitals.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec id=\"abs1-5\"><jats:title>Participants<\/jats:title><jats:p>Uterine trial \u2013 563 out of 565 randomised women had uterine prolapse surgery. Vault trial \u2013 208 out of 209 randomised women had vault prolapse surgery.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec id=\"abs1-6\"><jats:title>Interventions<\/jats:title><jats:p>Uterine trial \u2013 uterine preservation or vaginal hysterectomy. Vault trial \u2013 abdominal or vaginal vault suspension.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec id=\"abs1-7\"><jats:title>Main outcome measures<\/jats:title><jats:p>The primary outcome measures were women\u2019s prolapse symptoms (as measured using the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Symptom Score), prolapse-specific quality of life and cost-effectiveness (as assessed by incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year).<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec id=\"abs1-8\"><jats:title>Results<\/jats:title><jats:p>Uterine trial \u2013 adjusting for baseline and minimisation covariates, the mean Pelvic Organ Prolapse Symptom Score at 12 months for uterine preservation was 4.2 (standard deviation 4.9) versus vaginal hysterectomy with a Pelvic Organ Prolapse Symptom Score of 4.2 (standard deviation 5.3) (mean difference \u20130.05, 95% confidence interval \u20130.91 to 0.81). Serious adverse event rates were similar between the groups (uterine preservation 5.4% vs. vaginal hysterectomy 5.9%; risk ratio 0.82, 95% confidence interval 0.38 to 1.75). There was no difference in overall prolapse stage. Significantly more women would recommend vaginal hysterectomy to a friend (odds ratio 0.39, 95% confidence interval 0.18 to 0.83). Uterine preservation was \u00a3235 (95% confidence interval \u00a36 to \u00a3464) more expensive than vaginal hysterectomy and generated non-significantly fewer quality-adjusted life-years (mean difference \u20130.004, 95% confidence interval \u20130.026 to 0.019). Vault trial \u2013 adjusting for baseline and minimisation covariates, the mean Pelvic Organ Prolapse Symptom Score at 12 months for an abdominal procedure was 5.6 (standard deviation 5.4) versus vaginal procedure with a Pelvic Organ Prolapse Symptom Score of 5.9 (standard deviation 5.4) (mean difference \u20130.61, 95% confidence interval \u20132.08 to 0.86). The serious adverse event rates were similar between the groups (abdominal 5.9% vs. vaginal 6.0%; risk ratio 0.97, 95% confidence interval 0.27 to 3.44). The objective anterior prolapse stage 2b or more was higher in the vaginal group than in the abdominal group (odds ratio 0.38, 95% confidence interval 0.18 to 0.79). There was no difference in the overall prolapse stage. An abdominal procedure was \u00a3570 (95% confidence interval \u00a3459 to \u00a3682) more expensive than a vaginal procedure and generated non-significantly more quality-adjusted life-years (mean difference 0.004, 95% confidence interval \u20130.031 to 0.041).<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec id=\"abs1-9\"><jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title><jats:p>Uterine trial \u2013 in terms of efficacy, quality of life or adverse events in the short term, no difference was identified between uterine preservation and vaginal hysterectomy. Vault trial \u2013 in terms of efficacy, quality of life or adverse events in the short term, no difference was identified between an abdominal and a vaginal approach.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec id=\"abs1-10\"><jats:title>Future work<\/jats:title><jats:p>Long-term follow-up for at least 6 years is ongoing to identify recurrence rates, need for further prolapse surgery, adverse events and cost-effectiveness.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec id=\"abs1-11\"><jats:title>Trial registration<\/jats:title><jats:p>Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN86784244.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec id=\"abs1-12\"><jats:title>Funding<\/jats:title><jats:p>This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in<jats:italic>Health Technology Assessment<\/jats:italic>; Vol. 24, No. 13. See the National Institute for Health Research Journals Library website for further project information.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.3310\/hta24130","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,3,6]],"date-time":"2020-03-06T10:03:43Z","timestamp":1583489023000},"page":"1-220","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3310\/crossmarkpolicy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":27,"title":["Surgical interventions for uterine prolapse and for vault prolapse: the two VUE RCTs"],"prefix":"10.3310","volume":"24","clinical-trial-number":[{"clinical-trial-number":"isrctn86784244","registry":"10.18810\/isrctn","type":"results"}],"author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-0075-9036","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Christine","family":"Hemming","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, NHS Grampian, Aberdeen, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-9646-3904","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Lynda","family":"Constable","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-1490-7183","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Beatriz","family":"Goulao","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-3450-4536","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Mary","family":"Kilonzo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Health Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-9786-8118","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Dwayne","family":"Boyers","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Health Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-4172-4702","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Andrew","family":"Elders","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professionals Research Unit (NMAHP RU), Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-1486-0071","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Kevin","family":"Cooper","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, NHS Grampian, Aberdeen, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-2220-3725","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Anthony","family":"Smith","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"St Mary\u2019s Hospital, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-5234-2385","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Robert","family":"Freeman","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Derriford Hospital, Plymouth NHS Trust, Plymouth, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-9950-7079","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Suzanne","family":"Breeman","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-0256-2889","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Alison","family":"McDonald","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-9741-9160","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Suzanne","family":"Hagen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professionals Research Unit (NMAHP RU), Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Isobel","family":"Montgomery","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Independent patient representative, c\/o Health Services Research Unit, Aberdeen, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-9823-9252","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"John","family":"Norrie","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, Edinburgh BioQuarter, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-8667-2382","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Cathryn","family":"Glazener","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"6221","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2020,3]]},"reference":[{"issue":"95","key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3310\/hta20950","article-title":"Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of surgical options for the management of anterior and\/or posterior vaginal wall prolapse: two randomised controlled trials within a comprehensive cohort study \u2013 results from the PROSPECT Study","volume":"20","author":"Glazener","year":"2016","journal-title":"Health Technol Assess"},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib2","volume-title":"Incontinence 3rd Edition","author":"Hunskaar","year":"2005"},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"501","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(97)00058-6","article-title":"Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence","volume":"89","author":"Olsen","year":"1997","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"39","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2005.00773.x","article-title":"Collagen metabolism in the uterosacral ligaments and vaginal skin of women with uterine prolapse","volume":"113","author":"Phillips","year":"2006","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1311","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.300.11.1311","article-title":"Prevalence of symptomatic pelvic floor disorders in US women","volume":"300","author":"Nygaard","year":"2008","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"299","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(99)70203-6","article-title":"Signs of genital prolapse in a Swedish population of women 20 to 59 years of age and possible related factors","volume":"180","author":"Samuelsson","year":"1999","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"372","DOI":"10.1067\/S0002-9378(03)00698-7","article-title":"Correlation of symptoms with degree of pelvic organ support in a general population of women: what is pelvic organ prolapse?","volume":"189","author":"Swift","year":"2003","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1160","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2002.123819","article-title":"Pelvic organ prolapse in the Women\u2019s Health Initiative: gravity and gravidity","volume":"186","author":"Hendrix","year":"2002","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"CD004010","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD004010.pub3","article-title":"Pessaries (mechanical devices) for pelvic organ prolapse in women","volume":"2","author":"Bugge","year":"2013","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"125","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2010.12.039","article-title":"The history and usage of the vaginal pessary: a review","volume":"156","author":"Oliver","year":"2011","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib11","unstructured":"Maher C, Baessler K, Barber M, Cheon C, Consten E, Cooper K. Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery (Committee 15). International Continence Society, Florence, Italy, 12\u201315 September 2017."},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib12","volume-title":"Incontinence","author":"Abrams","year":"2017","edition":"6th ed."},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"CD003882","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD003882.pub4","article-title":"Conservative prevention and management of pelvic organ prolapse in women","volume":"12","author":"Hagen","year":"2011","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"CD007063","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007063.pub2","article-title":"Oestrogens for treatment or prevention of pelvic organ prolapse in postmenopausal women","volume":"9","author":"Ismail","year":"2010","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e0136265","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0136265","article-title":"Local oestrogen for pelvic floor disorders: a systematic review","volume":"10","author":"Weber","year":"2015","journal-title":"PLOS ONE"},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1201","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000286","article-title":"Lifetime risk of stress urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse surgery","volume":"123","author":"Wu","year":"2014","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1096","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181f73729","article-title":"Lifetime risk of undergoing surgery for pelvic organ prolapse","volume":"116","author":"Smith","year":"2010","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib18","unstructured":"NHS Digital. Hospital Admitted Patient Care Activity, 2016\u201317. Leeds: NHS Digital; 2017. URL: https:\/\/digital.nhs.uk\/catalogue\/PUB30098 (accessed 24 January 2018)."},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib19","unstructured":"Office for National Statistics. Z1 \u2013 Zipped Population Projections Data Files, UK. Newport: Office for National Statistics; 2017. URL: www.ons.gov.uk\/peoplepopulationandcommunity\/populationandmigration\/populationprojections\/datasets\/z1zippedpopulationprojectionsdatafilesuk (accessed 24 January 2018)."},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib20","unstructured":"National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Uterine Prolapse. Manchester: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. URL: www.nice.org.uk\/guidance\/conditions-and-diseases\/gynaecological-conditions\/uterine-prolapse\/products?Status=Published (accessed February 2019)."},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib21","unstructured":"National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Vault Prolapse. Manchester: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. URL: www.nice.org.uk\/Search?q=vault+prolapse (accessed 24 January 2018)."},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"CD012376","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD012376","article-title":"Surgery for women with apical vaginal prolapse","volume":"10","author":"Maher","year":"2016","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib23","unstructured":"National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Sacrocolpopexy with Hysterectomy Using Mesh to Repair Uterine Prolapse. Interventional Procedures Guidance IPG577. Manchester: NICE; 2017. URL: www.nice.org.uk\/guidance\/ipg577 (accessed 4 July 2017)."},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib24","unstructured":"National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Sacrocolpopexy Using Mesh to Repair Vaginal Vault Prolapse. Interventional Procedures Guidance IPG583. Manchester: NICE; 2017. URL: www.nice.org.uk\/guidance\/ipg583 (accessed 23 January 2018)."},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"233","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e318299a6cf","article-title":"Nationwide trends in the performance of inpatient hysterectomy in the United States","volume":"122","author":"Wright","year":"2013","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1350","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471\u20130528.2008.01845.x","article-title":"Efficacy and safety of using mesh or grafts in surgery for anterior and\/or posterior vaginal wall prolapse: systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"115","author":"Jia","year":"2008","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib27","unstructured":"National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Uterine Suspension Using Mesh (Including Sacrohysteropexy) to Repair Uterine Prolapse. Interventional Procedures Guidance IPG584. Manchester: NICE; 2017. URL: www.nice.org.uk\/guidance\/ipg584 (accessed 23 January 2018)."},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib28","unstructured":"National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Infracoccygeal Sacropexy Using Mesh to Repair Uterine Prolapse. Interventional Procedures Guidance IPG582. Manchester: NICE; 2017. URL: www.nice.org.uk\/guidance\/ipg582 (accessed 23 January 2018)."},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib29","unstructured":"National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Infracoccygeal Sacropexy Using Mesh to Repair Vaginal Vault Prolapse. Interventional Procedures Guidance IPG581. Manchester: NICE; 2017. URL: www.nice.org.uk\/guidance\/ipg581 (accessed 23 January 2018)."},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"CD004014","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD004014.pub5","article-title":"Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women","volume":"4","author":"Maher","year":"2013","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"441","DOI":"10.1186\/s13063\u2013016\u20131576-x","article-title":"Two parallel, pragmatic, UK multicentre, randomised controlled trials comparing surgical options for upper compartment (vault or uterine) pelvic organ prolapse (the VUE Study): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial","volume":"17","author":"Glazener","year":"2016","journal-title":"Trials"},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"527","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192\u2013012\u20131726-y","article-title":"An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)\/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for reporting outcomes of surgical procedures for pelvic organ prolapse","volume":"23","author":"Toozs-Hobson","year":"2012","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"25","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471\u20130528.2008.01903.x","article-title":"Psychometric properties of the pelvic organ prolapse symptom score","volume":"116","author":"Hagen","year":"2009","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib34","first-page":"1055","article-title":"Further properties of the pelvic organ prolapse symptom score: minimally important change and test-retest reliability","volume":"29","author":"Hagen","year":"2010","journal-title":"Neurourol Urodyn"},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1095","DOI":"10.1097\/00005650-199711000-00002","article-title":"Modelling valuations for EuroQoL health states","volume":"35","author":"Dolan","year":"1997","journal-title":"Med Care"},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1063","DOI":"10.1016\/S0022-5347(05)00348-4","article-title":"The international consultation on incontinence modular questionnaire","volume":"175","author":"Abrams","year":"2006","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"10","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(96)70243-0","article-title":"The standardisation of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction","volume":"175","author":"Bump","year":"1996","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2016","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2013.4919","article-title":"Long-term outcomes following abdominal sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse","volume":"309","author":"Nygaard","year":"2013","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1179","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192\u2013007\u20130306-z","article-title":"How accurate is symptomatic and clinical evaluation of prolapse prior to surgical repair?","volume":"18","author":"Fayyad","year":"2007","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct"},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib40","first-page":"237","article-title":"Rome III: new standard for functional gastrointestinal disorders","volume":"15","author":"Drossman","year":"2006","journal-title":"J Gastrointestin Liver Dis"},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib41","unstructured":"Scottish Government. Transvaginal Mesh Implants Independent Review: Final Report. Edinburgh: Scottish Government; 2017. URL: www.gov.scot\/Publications\/2017\/03\/3336\/0 (accessed 1 February 2018)."},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib42","unstructured":"NHS England. Mesh Oversight Group Report. London: NHS England; 2017. URL: www.england.nhs.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/07\/mesh-oversight-group-report.pdf (accessed 1 February 2018)."},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib43","volume-title":"British National Formulary","author":"Joint Formulary Committee"},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib44","unstructured":"Information Services Division Scotland. Specialty Costs \u2013 Detailed Tables. Edinburgh: Information Services Division Scotland. URL: www.isdscotland.org\/Health-topics\/Finance\/Costs\/Detailed-Tables\/Speciality-Costs\/index.asp (accessed 6 February 2018)."},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib45","unstructured":"Department of Health and Social Care. NHS Reference Costs 2015\u201316. London: Department of Health and Social Care; 2016. URL: www.gov.uk\/government\/publications\/nhs-reference-costs-2015-to-2016 (accessed 3 May 2017)."},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib46","volume-title":"Unit Costs of Health and Social Care 2016","author":"Curtis"},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib47","unstructured":"Information Services Division Scotland. ISD Scotland 63. Edinburgh: Information Services Division Scotland. URL: www.isdscotland.org\/Health-Topics\/Finance\/Costbook\/Speciality-Costs\/Overhead.asp (accessed October 2012)."},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib48","unstructured":"Information Services Division Scotland. R140X Theatre Services. Edinburgh: Information Services Division Scotland. URL: www.isdscotland.org\/Health-topics\/Finance\/Costs\/Detailed-Tables\/Theatres.asp (accessed 1 February 2018)."},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib49","unstructured":"NHS Business Services Authority. Electronic Drug Tariff. Newcastle upon Tyne: NHS Business Services Authority. URL: www.nhsbsa.nhs.uk\/pharmacies-gp-practices-and-appliance-contractors\/drug-tariff (accessed 1 October 2018)."},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib50","unstructured":"Information Services Division Scotland. Costs: File Listings. Edinburgh: Information Services Division Scotland. URL: www.isdscotland.org\/Health-Topics\/Finance\/Costs\/File-Listings-2016.asp (accessed 11 January 2017)."},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib51","unstructured":"Warrington Clinical Commissioning Group. Continence and Catheter Care Formulary. Warrington: Warrington Clinical Commissioning Group; 2014. URL: www.warringtonccg.nhs.uk\/Page%20Images\/public-info\/Catheter%20Care%20Formulary%20Revised%20February%202014%20revised.pdf (accessed February 2019)."},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib52","unstructured":"Office for National Statistics. Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings: 2016 Provisional Results. Newport: Office for National Statistics; 2016. URL: www.ons.gov.uk\/employmentandlabourmarket\/peopleinwork\/earningsandworkinghours\/bulletins\/annualsurveyofhoursandearnings\/2016provisionalresults (accessed 11 January 2017)."},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib53","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"199","DOI":"10.1016\/0168-8510(90)90421-9","article-title":"EuroQoL: a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life","volume":"16","author":"EuroQoL Group","year":"1990","journal-title":"Health Policy"},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib54","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"487","DOI":"10.1002\/hec.944","article-title":"Estimating mean QALYs in trial-based cost-effectiveness analysis: the importance of controlling for baseline utility","volume":"14","author":"Manca","year":"2005","journal-title":"Health Econ"},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib55","volume-title":"Economic Evaluation in Clinical Trials","author":"Glick","year":"2015","edition":"2nd edn."},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib56","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1093\/oso\/9780198529446.001.0001","volume-title":"Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes","author":"Drummond","year":"2005","edition":"3rd edn."},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib57","unstructured":"National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Developing NICE Guidelines: The Manual. Manchester: NICE; 2014. URL: www.nice.org.uk\/guidance\/pmg20\/resources\/developing-nice-guidelines-the-manual-pdf-72286708700869 (accessed 18 May 2017)."},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib58","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"527","DOI":"10.1177\/1536867X0500500404","article-title":"Multiple imputation of missing values: update of ice","volume":"5","author":"Royston","year":"2005","journal-title":"Stata J"},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib59","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"327","DOI":"10.1002\/(SICI)1099-1050(199707)6:4<327::AID-HEC282>3.0.CO;2-W","article-title":"Pulling cost-effectiveness analysis up by its bootstraps: a non-parametric approach to confidence interval estimation","volume":"6","author":"Briggs","year":"1997","journal-title":"Health Econ"},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib60","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"461","DOI":"10.1002\/hec.843","article-title":"Regression methods for covariate adjustment and subgroup analysis for non-censored cost-effectiveness data","volume":"13","author":"Willan","year":"2004","journal-title":"Health Econ"},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib61","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"c332","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.c332","article-title":"CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials","volume":"340","author":"Schulz","year":"2010","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib62","unstructured":"Office for National Statistics. Interim Life Tables 2007\u20132009. Newport: Office for National Statistics. URL: www.ons.gov.uk\/peoplepopulationandcommunity\/birthsdeathsandmarriages\/lifeexpectancies#datasets (accessed February 2019)."},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib63","unstructured":"National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Guide to the Methods of Technology Appraisal 2013. Manchester: NICE; 2013. URL: www.nice.org.uk\/process\/pmg9\/chapter\/foreword (accessed 7 February 2018)."},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib64","volume-title":"NICE DSU Technical Support Document 14: Survival Analysis for Economic Evaluations Alongside Clinical Trials \u2013 Extrapolation with Patient-level Data","author":"Latimer"},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib65","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"743","DOI":"10.1177\/0272989X12472398","article-title":"Survival analysis for economic evaluations alongside clinical trials \u2013 extrapolation with patient-level data: inconsistencies, limitations, and a practical guide","volume":"33","author":"Latimer","year":"2013","journal-title":"Med Decis Making"},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib66","volume-title":"NICE DSU Technical Support Document 12: The Use of Health State Utility Values in Decision Models","author":"Ara"},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib67","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"49","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192\u2013014\u20132413-y","article-title":"Incidence and lifetime risk of pelvic organ prolapse surgery in Denmark from 1977 to 2009","volume":"26","author":"L\u00f8wenstein","year":"2015","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib68","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"755.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.02.017","article-title":"Prolapse and continence surgery in countries of the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development in 2012","volume":"212","author":"Haya","year":"2015","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib69","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"108","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2003.101","article-title":"Procedures for pelvic organ prolapse in the United States, 1979\u201397","volume":"188","author":"Boyles","year":"2003","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib70","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"421","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192\u2013007\u20130457-y","article-title":"The age distribution, rates, and types of surgery for pelvic organ prolapse in the USA","volume":"19","author":"Shah","year":"2008","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct"},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib71","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"208.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.02.027","article-title":"Temporal trends in obstetric trauma and inpatient surgery for pelvic organ prolapse: an age-period-cohort analysis","volume":"215","author":"Lisonkova","year":"2016","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib72","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"277","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2000.107583","article-title":"The distribution of pelvic organ support in a population of female subjects seen for routine gynecologic health care","volume":"183","author":"Swift","year":"2000","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib73","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"272","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-005-1314-5","article-title":"Epidemiology of prolapse and incontinence questionnaire: validation of a new epidemiologic survey","volume":"16","author":"Lukacz","year":"2005","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct"},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib74","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1332","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2001.119078","article-title":"Correlation of symptoms with location and severity of pelvic organ prolapse","volume":"185","author":"Ellerkmann","year":"2001","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib75","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"103","DOI":"10.1097\/SPV.0b013e31827d8667","article-title":"Attitudes towards hysterectomy in women undergoing evaluation for uterovaginal prolapse","volume":"19","author":"Frick","year":"2013","journal-title":"Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg"},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib76","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"470.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2013.08.003","article-title":"Patient preferences for uterine preservation and hysterectomy in women with pelvic organ prolapse","volume":"209","author":"Korbly","year":"2013","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib77","unstructured":"National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Transvaginal Mesh Repair of Anterior or Posterior Vaginal Wall Prolapse. Manchester: NICE; 2017. URL: www.nice.org.uk\/guidance\/ipg599 (accessed 13 February 2018)."},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib78","first-page":"249","article-title":"Risk factors for failure of transvaginal sacrospinous uterine suspension in the treatment of uterovaginal prolapse","volume":"104","author":"Lin","year":"2005","journal-title":"J Formos Med Assoc"},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib79","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"889","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-006-0262-z","article-title":"Conservation of the prolapsed uterus is a valid option: medium term results of a prospective comparative study with the posterior intravaginal slingoplasty operation","volume":"18","author":"Neuman","year":"2007","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct"},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib80","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"625","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-011-1635-5","article-title":"Hysteropexy compared to hysterectomy for uterine prolapse surgery: does durability differ?","volume":"23","author":"Romanzi","year":"2012","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib81","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"93","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-015-2775-9","article-title":"Laparoscopic sacral hysteropexy versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse","volume":"27","author":"Pan","year":"2016","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib82","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"165","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-015-2932-1","article-title":"An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)\/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic organ prolapse (POP)","volume":"27","author":"Haylen","year":"2016","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib83","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1837","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2006.06.065","article-title":"Advanced anterior vaginal wall prolapse is highly correlated with apical prolapse","volume":"195","author":"Rooney","year":"2006","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib84","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"137","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-007-0405-x","article-title":"Anterior vaginal wall length and degree of anterior compartment prolapse seen on dynamic MRI","volume":"19","author":"Hsu","year":"2008","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct"},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib85","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"600","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181b2b1ae","article-title":"Defining success after surgery for pelvic organ prolapse","volume":"114","author":"Barber","year":"2009","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib86","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"796","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(13)61977-7","article-title":"Individualised pelvic floor muscle training in women with pelvic organ prolapse (POPPY): a multicentre randomised controlled trial","volume":"383","author":"Hagen","year":"2014","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib87","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1005","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e318231537c","article-title":"Laparoscopic compared with robotic sacrocolpopexy for vaginal prolapse: a randomised controlled trial","volume":"118","author":"Paraiso","year":"2011","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib88","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1257","DOI":"10.1007\/s00345-015-1591-7","article-title":"Stress incontinence surgery at the time of prolapse surgery: mandatory or forbidden?","volume":"33","author":"King","year":"2015","journal-title":"World J Urol"},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib89","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"795","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192\u2013017\u20133476\u20133","article-title":"The UK National Prolapse Survey: 10 years on","volume":"29","author":"Jha","year":"2018","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib90","volume-title":"Immediate Stop to NHS Mesh Operations","author":"BBC News"},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib91","volume-title":"Pause in Surgical Mesh Use to be Extended to Northern Ireland","author":"Smyth"},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib92","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"367","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e318195888d","article-title":"Complication and reoperation rates after apical vaginal prolapse surgical repair: A systematic review","volume":"113","author":"Diwadkar","year":"2009","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib93","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"161","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.12075","article-title":"Childbirth and prolapse: long-term associations with the symptoms and objective measurement of pelvic organ prolapse","volume":"120","author":"Glazener","year":"2013","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib94","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"299","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192\u2013009\u20131033\u20134","article-title":"An estimation of the frequency of surgery for posthysterectomy vault prolapse","volume":"21","author":"Aigmueller","year":"2010","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib95","first-page":"679","article-title":"True incidence of vaginal vault prolapse. Thirteen years of experience","volume":"44","author":"Marchionni","year":"1999","journal-title":"J Reprod Med"},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib96","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"872","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(88)90088-9","article-title":"Sacrospinous ligament fixation for eversion of the vagina","volume":"158","author":"Morley","year":"1988","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib97","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1171","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2011.03011.x","article-title":"Outcomes following hysterectomy or endometrial ablation for heavy menstrual bleeding: retrospective analysis of hospital episode statistics in Scotland","volume":"118","author":"Cooper","year":"2011","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib98","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"642.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2007.08.023","article-title":"Bowel symptoms in women 1 year after sacrocolpopexy","volume":"197","author":"Bradley","year":"2007","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib99","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1496","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2001.114868","article-title":"The demographics of pelvic floor disorders: current observations and future projections","volume":"184","author":"Luber","year":"2001","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib100","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"143","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31827558dc","article-title":"Porcine dermis compared with polypropylene mesh for laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: a randomised controlled trial","volume":"121","author":"Culligan","year":"2013","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib101","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"563","DOI":"10.1002\/nau.20805","article-title":"Sacrocolpopexy using xenogenic acellular collagen in patients at increased risk for graft-related complications","volume":"29","author":"Claerhout","year":"2010","journal-title":"Neurourol Urodyn"},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib102","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"557.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.01.050","article-title":"Abdominal sacrocolpopexy: anatomic outcomes and complications with Pelvicol, autologous and synthetic graft materials","volume":"198","author":"Quiroz","year":"2008","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib103","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2362","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2009.07.043","article-title":"Medium term outcome of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with xenografts compared to synthetic grafts","volume":"182","author":"Deprest","year":"2009","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib104","volume-title":"Our Products","author":"PROACT Medical Ltd","year":"2018"},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib105","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"50","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2004.00001.x","article-title":"A randomised controlled trial comparing abdominal and vaginal prolapse surgery: effects on urogenital function","volume":"111","author":"Roovers","year":"2004","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib106","unstructured":"Malandri M, Iordanidou E, Takou M, Moraitis B, Balaxis D. A Randomised Comparison of Two Vaginal Procedures for the Treatment of Stage Two, or Higher Uterine Prolapse: Hysterectomy With Mesh Versus Only Mesh Implantation. International Continence Society, October 2012, Beijing, China, abstract no. 101."},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib107","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"213","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jsxm.2015.12.006","article-title":"The impact of sacrospinous hysteropexy and vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments on sexual function in women with uterine prolapse: a secondary analysis of a randomised comparative study","volume":"13","author":"Detollenaere","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Sex Med"},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib108","first-page":"65","article-title":"A randomised comparison of two vaginal procedures for the treatment of uterine prolapse using polypropylene mesh: histateroxy versus hysterectomy","volume":"36","author":"Carramao","year":"2009","journal-title":"Rev Col Bras Cir"},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib109","unstructured":"Juneja M, Munday D, Kopetz V, Barry C. Hysterectomy vs No Hysterectomy for Uterine Prolapse in Conjunction with Posterior Infracococcygeal Colpopexy \u2013 A Randomised Pilot Study 12 Months Review. International Continence Society and International Urogynaecological Association, 23\u20137 August 2010, Toronto, ON, Canada, abstract no. 692."},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib110","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"209","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-009-1014-7","article-title":"One-year follow-up after sacrospinous hysteropexy and vaginal hysterectomy for uterine descent: a randomised study","volume":"21","author":"Dietz","year":"2010","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib111","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1687","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-015-2761-2","article-title":"Laparoscopic hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy for the treatment of uterovaginal prolapse: a prospective randomised pilot study","volume":"26","author":"Rahmanou","year":"2015","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib112","first-page":"669","article-title":"Sexual functioning after vaginal hysterectomy or transvaginal sacrospinous uterine suspension for uterine prolapse: a comparison","volume":"50","author":"Jeng","year":"2005","journal-title":"J Reprod Med"},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib113","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"20","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2003.08.031","article-title":"Abdominal sacral colpopexy or vaginal sacrospinous colpopexy for vaginal vault prolapse: a prospective randomised study","volume":"190","author":"Maher","year":"2004","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib114","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"360.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.11.016","article-title":"Laparoscopic sacral colpopexy versus total vaginal mesh for vaginal vault prolapse: a randomized trial","volume":"204","author":"Maher","year":"2011","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib115","first-page":"S48","article-title":"Randomised controlled trial of post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse treatment with extraperitoneal vaginal uterosacral ligament suspension with anterior mesh reinforcement vs sacrocolpopexy (open\/laparoscopic)","volume":"23","author":"Lim","year":"2012","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib116","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"173","DOI":"10.4324\/9780203413081_chapter_9","volume-title":"Analysing Qualitative Data","author":"Ritchie","year":"1994"},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib117","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1337","DOI":"10.1016\/S0277-9536(97)00063-4","article-title":"Making sense of randomization; responses of parents of critically ill babies to random allocation of treatment in a clinical trial","volume":"45","author":"Snowdon","year":"1997","journal-title":"Social Sci Med"},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib118","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2018","DOI":"10.1016\/j.socscimed.2009.02.023","article-title":"It\u2019s not just what you say, it\u2019s also how you say it: opening the \u2018black box\u2019 of informed consent appointments in randomised controlled trials","volume":"68","author":"Wade","year":"2009","journal-title":"Soc Sci Med"},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib119","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"631","DOI":"10.1001\/archotol.128.6.631","article-title":"Randomised controlled trials for evaluating surgical questions","volume":"128","author":"Fung","year":"2002","journal-title":"Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg"},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib120","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"233","DOI":"10.1177\/1355819613483126","article-title":"Recruitment to clinical trials: a meta-ethnographic synthesis of studies of reasons for participation","volume":"18","author":"McCann","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Health Serv Res Policy"},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib121","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"696","DOI":"10.1177\/1740774510381286","article-title":"Women\u2019s views and experiences of a patient preference trial in surgery: a qualitative study of the CARPET1 trial","volume":"7","author":"Jackson","year":"2010","journal-title":"Clin Trials"},{"key":"key20200306100039326_ref1-bib122","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1402","DOI":"10.1038\/bjc.2013.113","article-title":"Drivers and barriers to patient participation in RCTs","volume":"108","author":"Jenkins","year":"2013","journal-title":"Br J Cancer"}],"container-title":["Health Technology Assessment"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk\/publications\/hta24130\/hta24130.xml","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/njl-admin.nihr.ac.uk\/document\/download\/2010897","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk\/publications\/hta24130\/hta24130.xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/njl-admin.nihr.ac.uk\/document\/download\/2031996","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,8,1]],"date-time":"2024-08-01T18:40:29Z","timestamp":1722537629000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk\/hta\/hta24130"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,3]]},"references-count":122,"journal-issue":{"issue":"13","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2020,3]]}},"alternative-id":["10.3310\/hta24130"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3310\/hta24130","relation":{},"ISSN":["1366-5278","2046-4924"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1366-5278","type":"print"},{"value":"2046-4924","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,3]]},"assertion":[{"value":"This content has been made freely available to all.","name":"free","label":"Free to read"}]}}