{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,11]],"date-time":"2026-09-11T16:17:38Z","timestamp":1789143458458,"version":"build-2803163510"},"reference-count":73,"publisher":"National Institute for Health and Care Research","issue":"24","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,4,1]],"date-time":"2021-04-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1617235200000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.nationalarchives.gov.uk\/doc\/non-commercial-government-licence\/non-commercial-government-licence.htm"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100000664","name":"Health Technology Assessment programme","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["12\/201\/10"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["12\/201\/10"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100000664","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Health Technol Assess"],"abstract":"\n Background<\/jats:title>\n Sciatica is a common condition reported to affect >\u20093% of the UK population at any time and is most often caused by a prolapsed intervertebral disc. Currently, there is no uniformly adopted treatment strategy. Invasive treatments, such as surgery (i.e. microdiscectomy) and transforaminal epidural steroid injection, are often reserved for failed conservative treatment.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Objective<\/jats:title>\n To compare the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of microdiscectomy with transforaminal epidural steroid injection for the management of radicular pain secondary to lumbar prolapsed intervertebral disc for non-emergency presentation of sciatica of <\u200912 months\u2019 duration.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Interventions<\/jats:title>\n Patients were randomised to either (1) microdiscectomy or (2) transforaminal epidural steroid injection.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Design<\/jats:title>\n A pragmatic, multicentre, randomised prospective trial comparing microdiscectomy with transforaminal epidural steroid injection for sciatica due to prolapsed intervertebral disc with <\u20091 year symptom duration.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Setting<\/jats:title>\n NHS services providing secondary spinal surgical care within the UK.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Participants<\/jats:title>\n A total of 163 participants (aged 16\u201365 years) were recruited from 11 UK NHS outpatient clinics.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Main outcome measures<\/jats:title>\n The primary outcome was participant-completed Oswestry Disability Questionnaire score at 18 weeks post randomisation. Secondary outcomes were visual analogue scores for leg pain and back pain; modified Roland\u2013Morris score (for sciatica), Core Outcome Measures Index score and participant satisfaction at 12-weekly intervals. Cost-effectiveness and quality of life were assessed using the EuroQol-5 Dimensions, five-level version; Hospital Episode Statistics data; medication usage; and self-reported cost data at 12-weekly intervals. Adverse event data were collected. The economic outcome was incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year gained from the perspective of the NHS in England.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Results<\/jats:title>\n Eighty-three participants were allocated to transforaminal epidural steroid injection and 80 participants were allocated to microdiscectomy, using an online randomisation system. At week 18, Oswestry Disability Questionnaire scores had decreased, relative to baseline, by 26.7 points in the microdiscectomy group and by 24.5 points in the transforaminal epidural steroid injection. The difference between the treatments was not statistically significant (estimated treatment effect \u20134.25 points, 95% confidence interval \u201311.09 to 2.59 points). Nor were there significant differences between treatments in any of the secondary outcomes: Oswestry Disability Questionnaire scores, visual analogue scores for leg pain and back pain, modified Roland\u2013Morris score and Core Outcome Measures Index score up to 54 weeks. There were four (3.8%) serious adverse events in the microdiscectomy group, including one nerve palsy (foot drop), and none in the transforaminal epidural steroid injection group. Compared with transforaminal epidural steroid injection, microdiscectomy had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of \u00a338,737 per quality-adjusted life-year gained and a probability of 0.17 of being cost-effective at a willingness to pay threshold of \u00a320,000 per quality-adjusted life-year.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Limitations<\/jats:title>\n Primary outcome data was invalid or incomplete for 24% of participants. Sensitivity analyses demonstrated robustness to assumptions made regarding missing data. Eighteen per cent of participants in the transforaminal epidural steroid injection group subsequently received microdiscectomy prior to their primary outcome assessment.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n To the best of our knowledge, the NErve Root Block VErsus Surgery trial is the first trial to evaluate the comparative clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of microdiscectomy and transforaminal epidural steroid injection. No statistically significant difference was found between the two treatments for the primary outcome. It is unlikely that microdiscectomy is cost-effective compared with transforaminal epidural steroid injection at a threshold of \u00a320,000 per quality-adjusted life-year for sciatica secondary to prolapsed intervertebral disc.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Future work<\/jats:title>\n These results will lead to further studies in the streamlining and earlier management of discogenic sciatica.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Trial registration<\/jats:title>\n Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN04820368 and EudraCT 2014-002751-25.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Funding<\/jats:title>\n This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment<\/jats:italic>; Vol. 25, No. 24. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.3310\/hta25240","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,4,13]],"date-time":"2021-04-13T09:12:24Z","timestamp":1618305144000},"page":"1-86","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3310\/crossmarkpolicy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":10,"title":["Microdiscectomy compared with transforaminal epidural steroid injection for persistent radicular pain caused by prolapsed intervertebral disc: the NERVES RCT"],"prefix":"10.3310","volume":"25","clinical-trial-number":[{"clinical-trial-number":"isrctn04820368","registry":"10.18810\/isrctn","type":"results"},{"clinical-trial-number":"2014-002751-25","registry":"10.18810\/euctr","type":"results"}],"author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-6647-9040","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Martin J","family":"Wilby","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Neurosurgery, The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust (member of Liverpool Health Partners), Liverpool, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-7268-8735","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Ashley","family":"Best","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Liverpool Clinical Trials Centre, University of Liverpool (member of Liverpool Health Partners), Liverpool, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-2785-7325","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Eifiona","family":"Wood","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Centre for Health Economics and Medicines Evaluation, Bangor University, Bangor, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-7398-1346","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Girvan","family":"Burnside","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Liverpool Clinical Trials Centre, University of Liverpool (member of Liverpool Health Partners), Liverpool, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-5209-1854","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Emma","family":"Bedson","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Liverpool Clinical Trials Centre, University of Liverpool (member of Liverpool Health Partners), Liverpool, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-4215-9258","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Hannah","family":"Short","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Liverpool Clinical Trials Centre, University of Liverpool (member of Liverpool Health Partners), Liverpool, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-9230-8349","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Dianne","family":"Wheatley","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Liverpool Clinical Trials Centre, University of Liverpool (member of Liverpool Health Partners), Liverpool, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-1936-3907","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Daniel","family":"Hill-McManus","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Centre for Health Economics and Medicines Evaluation, Bangor University, Bangor, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-0354-3145","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Manohar","family":"Sharma","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Pain Medicine, The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, Liverpool, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-1225-2320","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Simon","family":"Clark","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Neurosurgery, The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust (member of Liverpool Health Partners), Liverpool, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-9261-9350","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Jennifer","family":"Bostock","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Patient and public involvement representative, Kent, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Sally","family":"Hay","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Patient and public involvement representative, Norfolk, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-1898-8243","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Ganesan","family":"Baranidharan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Leeds Teaching Hospital NHS Trust, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-0111-9364","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Cathy","family":"Price","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Pain Clinic, Solent NHS Trust, Southampton, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-6010-6227","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Richard","family":"Mannion","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Cambridge, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-2796-1835","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Peter J","family":"Hutchinson","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Academic Division of Neurosurgery, University of Cambridge, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-8247-7459","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Dyfrig A","family":"Hughes","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Centre for Health Economics and Medicines Evaluation, Bangor University, Bangor, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-6861-8806","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Anthony","family":"Marson","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of Liverpool and The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-9802-6636","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Paula R","family":"Williamson","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Liverpool Clinical Trials Centre, University of Liverpool (member of Liverpool Health Partners), Liverpool, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"6221","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,4]]},"reference":[{"key":"key20210408125743471_ref1-bib1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"120","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jphys.2017.02.012","article-title":"Low back pain and sciatica in over 16s: assessment and management NICE Guideline [NG59]","volume":"63","author":"de Campos","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Physiother"},{"key":"key20210408125743471_ref1-bib2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2464","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e318183a4a2","article-title":"Sciatica: review of epidemiological studies and prevalence estimates","volume":"33","author":"Konstantinou","year":"2008","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"key20210408125743471_ref1-bib3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2409","DOI":"10.1097\/01.brs.0000239178.08796.52","article-title":"Effectiveness of microdiscectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a randomized controlled trial with 2 years of follow-up","volume":"31","author":"Osterman","year":"2006","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"key20210408125743471_ref1-bib4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1316","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1526-4637.2011.01213.x","article-title":"Efficacy of interlaminar vs transforaminal epidural steroid injection for the treatment of chronic unilateral radicular pain: prospective, randomized study","volume":"12","author":"Rados","year":"2011","journal-title":"Pain Med"},{"key":"key20210408125743471_ref1-bib5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"l6273","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.l6273","article-title":"Diagnosis and treatment of sciatica","volume":"367","author":"Jensen","year":"2019","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"key20210408125743471_ref1-bib6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"60","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-017-5099-2","article-title":"National clinical guidelines for non-surgical treatment of patients with recent onset low back pain or lumbar radiculopathy","volume":"27","author":"Stochkendahl","year":"2018","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"key":"key20210408125743471_ref1-bib7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2245","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa064039","article-title":"Surgery versus prolonged conservative treatment for sciatica","volume":"356","author":"Peul","year":"2007","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"key20210408125743471_ref1-bib8","volume-title":"Data Access Environment (DAE)","author":"NHS Digital"},{"key":"key20210408125743471_ref1-bib9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1207","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-199405310-00002","article-title":"Low back pain hospitalization. Recent United States trends and regional variations","volume":"19","author":"Taylor","year":"1994","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976"},{"key":"key20210408125743471_ref1-bib10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E3","DOI":"10.3171\/foc.2002.13.2.4","article-title":"Lumbar microdiscectomy: a historical perspective and current technical considerations","volume":"13","author":"Koebbe","year":"2002","journal-title":"Neurosurg Focus"},{"key":"key20210408125743471_ref1-bib11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2789","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e31818ed8f4","article-title":"Surgical versus nonoperative treatment for lumbar disc herniation: four-year results for the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT)","volume":"33","author":"Weinstein","year":"2008","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"key20210408125743471_ref1-bib12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1777","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-199608010-00011","article-title":"The Maine Lumbar Spine Study, Part II. 1-year outcomes of surgical and nonsurgical management of sciatica","volume":"21","author":"Atlas","year":"1996","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"key20210408125743471_ref1-bib13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1355","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.a143","article-title":"Prolonged conservative care versus early surgery in patients with sciatica caused by lumbar disc herniation: two year results of a randomised controlled trial","volume":"336","author":"Peul","year":"2008","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"key20210408125743471_ref1-bib14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"670","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-200404000-00002","article-title":"Treatment of lumbar disc herniation: epidural steroid injection compared with discectomy. A prospective, randomized study","volume":"86","author":"Buttermann","year":"2004","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am"},{"issue":"39","key":"key20210408125743471_ref1-bib15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3310\/hta15390","article-title":"The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of management strategies for sciatica: systematic review and economic model","volume":"15","author":"Lewis","year":"2011","journal-title":"Health Technol Assess"},{"key":"key20210408125743471_ref1-bib16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"175","DOI":"10.1097\/AAP.0b013e31828ea086","article-title":"Epidural steroids: a comprehensive, evidence-based review","volume":"38","author":"Cohen","year":"2013","journal-title":"Reg Anesth Pain Med"},{"key":"key20210408125743471_ref1-bib17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1362","DOI":"10.1016\/S0003-9993(98)90228-3","article-title":"Fluoroscopic transforaminal lumbar epidural steroids: an outcome study","volume":"79","author":"Lutz","year":"1998","journal-title":"Arch Phys Med Rehabil"},{"issue":"33","key":"key20210408125743471_ref1-bib18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3310\/hta9330","article-title":"Cost-effectiveness and safety of epidural steroids in the management of sciatica","volume":"9","author":"Price","year":"2005","journal-title":"Health Technol Assess"},{"key":"key20210408125743471_ref1-bib19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"865","DOI":"10.7326\/0003-4819-157-12-201212180-00564","article-title":"Epidural corticosteroid injections in the management of sciatica: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"157","author":"Pinto","year":"2012","journal-title":"Ann Intern Med"},{"key":"key20210408125743471_ref1-bib20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"871","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1526-4637.2011.01116.x","article-title":"Predictors of a favorable response to transforaminal injection of steroids in patients with lumbar radicular pain due to disc herniation","volume":"12","author":"Ghahreman","year":"2011","journal-title":"Pain Med"},{"key":"key20210408125743471_ref1-bib21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1149","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1526-4637.2010.00908.x","article-title":"The efficacy of transforaminal injection of steroids for the treatment of lumbar radicular pain","volume":"11","author":"Ghahreman","year":"2010","journal-title":"Pain Med"},{"key":"key20210408125743471_ref1-bib22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"239","DOI":"10.1111\/pme.12896","article-title":"Adverse event rates associated with transforaminal and interlaminar epidural steroid injections: a multi-institutional study","volume":"17","author":"El-Yahchouchi","year":"2016","journal-title":"Pain Med"},{"key":"key20210408125743471_ref1-bib23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2533","DOI":"10.1007\/s00264-016-3220-5","article-title":"Comparison of transforaminal verse interlaminar epidural steroid injection in low back pain with lumbosacral radicular pain: a meta-analysis of the literature","volume":"40","author":"Wei","year":"2016","journal-title":"Int Orthop"},{"key":"key20210408125743471_ref1-bib24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"584","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2452062007","article-title":"Effectiveness of transforaminal epidural steroid injection by using a preganglionic approach: a prospective randomized controlled study 1","volume":"245","author":"Jeong","year":"2007","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"key20210408125743471_ref1-bib25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"467","DOI":"10.1007\/s40258-019-00471-w","article-title":"Systematic review of decision analytic modelling in economic evaluations of low back pain and sciatica","volume":"17","author":"Hall","year":"2019","journal-title":"Appl Health Econ Health Policy"},{"key":"key20210408125743471_ref1-bib26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"28","DOI":"10.14444\/2028","article-title":"Cost-effectiveness of three treatment strategies for lumbar spinal stenosis: conservative care, laminectomy, and the superion interspinous spacer","volume":"9","author":"Parker","year":"2015","journal-title":"Int J Spine Surg"},{"key":"key20210408125743471_ref1-bib27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E345","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3181f2ed2f","article-title":"Cost-effectiveness of the X-STOP\u00ae interspinous spacer for lumbar spinal stenosis","volume":"36","author":"Skidmore","year":"2011","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"key20210408125743471_ref1-bib28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"107","DOI":"10.1111\/papr.12160","article-title":"The 2-year cost-effectiveness of 3 options to treat lumbar spinal stenosis patients","volume":"15","author":"Udeh","year":"2015","journal-title":"Pain Pract"},{"key":"key20210408125743471_ref1-bib29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1069","DOI":"10.1007\/s11999-013-3440-6","article-title":"How does accounting for worker productivity affect the measured cost-effectiveness of lumbar discectomy?","volume":"472","author":"Koenig","year":"2014","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res"},{"key":"key20210408125743471_ref1-bib30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1318","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pain.2014.04.008","article-title":"Cost-effectiveness of different strategies to manage patients with sciatica","volume":"155","author":"Fitzsimmons","year":"2014","journal-title":"Pain"},{"key":"key20210408125743471_ref1-bib31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1351","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.39583.709074.BE","article-title":"Prolonged conservative care versus early surgery in patients with sciatica from lumbar disc herniation: cost utility analysis alongside a randomised controlled trial","volume":"336","author":"van den Hout","year":"2008","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"key20210408125743471_ref1-bib32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"810","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jval.2015.05.002","article-title":"A cost-effectiveness analysis of minimally invasive versus open surgery techniques for lumbar spinal fusion in Italy and the United Kingdom","volume":"18","author":"Vertuani","year":"2015","journal-title":"Value Health"},{"key":"key20210408125743471_ref1-bib33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2191","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2013.281053","article-title":"Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects","volume":"310","author":"World Medical Association","year":"2013","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"key20210408125743471_ref1-bib34","unstructured":"Ionising Radiation (Medical Exposure) Regulations 2000 (Statutory Instrument 2000 No. 1059). London: HMSO; 2000."},{"key":"key20210408125743471_ref1-bib35","unstructured":"Medicines for Human Use (Clinical Trials) Regulations. Statutory Instrument 2004\/1031. London: HMSO; 2004."},{"key":"key20210408125743471_ref1-bib36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2003","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-199809150-00018","article-title":"Outcome measures for low back pain research. A proposal for standardized use","volume":"23","author":"Deyo","year":"1998","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"key20210408125743471_ref1-bib37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"8","DOI":"10.1093\/ptj\/82.1.8","article-title":"A comparison of five low back disability questionnaires: reliability and responsiveness","volume":"82","author":"Davidson","year":"2002","journal-title":"Phys Ther"},{"key":"key20210408125743471_ref1-bib38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"481","DOI":"10.1097\/j.pain.0000000000001117","article-title":"Core outcome measurement instruments for clinical trials in nonspecific low back pain","volume":"159","author":"Chiarotto","year":"2018","journal-title":"Pain"},{"key":"key20210408125743471_ref1-bib39","first-page":"691","article-title":"Guidelines for clinical studies assessing the efficacy of drugs for the management of acute low back pain","volume":"21","author":"Devogelaer","year":"2003","journal-title":"Clin Exp Rheumatol"},{"key":"key20210408125743471_ref1-bib40","first-page":"271","article-title":"The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire","volume":"66","author":"Fairbank","year":"1980","journal-title":"Physiotherapy"},{"key":"key20210408125743471_ref1-bib41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"475","DOI":"10.1186\/s13063-018-2677-5","article-title":"NErve Root Block VErsus Surgery (NERVES) for the treatment of radicular pain secondary to a prolapsed intervertebral disc herniation: study protocol for a multi-centre randomised controlled trial","volume":"19","author":"Wilby","year":"2018","journal-title":"Trials"},{"key":"key20210408125743471_ref1-bib42","unstructured":"National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Guide to the Methods of Technology Appraisal 2013. Process and Methods [PMG9]. London: NICE; 2013."},{"key":"key20210408125743471_ref1-bib43","volume-title":"NERVES Resource Use Questionnaire"},{"key":"key20210408125743471_ref1-bib44","volume-title":"Unit Costs of Health and Social Care 2018","author":"Curtis","year":"2018"},{"key":"key20210408125743471_ref1-bib45","unstructured":"NHS Improvement. National Schedule of Reference Costs 2017\u20132018. London: NHS Improvement; 2018."},{"key":"key20210408125743471_ref1-bib46","unstructured":"NHS Digital. National Casemix Office 2017. Casemix Companion HRG4+ 2017\/18 Local Payment Grouper. Leeds: NHS Digital; 2017."},{"key":"key20210408125743471_ref1-bib47","volume-title":"Unit Costs of Health and Social Care 2013","author":"Curtis","year":"2013"},{"key":"key20210408125743471_ref1-bib48","volume-title":"Acupuncture","author":"NHS","year":"2016"},{"key":"key20210408125743471_ref1-bib49","volume-title":"Osteopathy","author":"NHS","year":"2018"},{"key":"key20210408125743471_ref1-bib50","volume-title":"Chiropractic","author":"NHS","year":"2017"},{"key":"key20210408125743471_ref1-bib51","volume-title":"How Much Does Private Physiotherapy Cost?","author":"Capital Physio, London, UK","year":"2016"},{"key":"key20210408125743471_ref1-bib52","volume-title":"Prescription Cost Analysis (PCA) Data September 2017","author":"NHS Business Services Authority","year":"2017"},{"key":"key20210408125743471_ref1-bib53","unstructured":"Joint Formulary Committee. British National Formulary. 84 ed. London: BMJ Group and Pharmaceutical Press; 2017."},{"key":"key20210408125743471_ref1-bib54","volume-title":"Retail Pharmacy Prices","author":"Boots Ltd","year":"2019"},{"key":"key20210408125743471_ref1-bib55","volume-title":"Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings 2017, Table 6Weekly Pay \u2013 Gross (\u00a3) \u2013 For Full-time Employee Jobs: United Kingdom, 2017","author":"Office for National Statistics","year":"2017"},{"key":"key20210408125743471_ref1-bib56","volume-title":"Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings 2017, 9. Regional Earnings, Figure 13. Median Full-time Gross Weekly Earnings by Place of Work, Great Britain, April 2017","author":"Office for National Statistics","year":"2017"},{"key":"key20210408125743471_ref1-bib57","volume-title":"Typical Vehicle Running Costs \u2013 For a Diesel Engine Car","author":"Royal Automobile Club","year":"2016"},{"key":"key20210408125743471_ref1-bib58","volume-title":"Typical Vehicle Running Costs \u2013 For a Petrol Engine Car","author":"Royal Automobile Club","year":"2016"},{"key":"key20210408125743471_ref1-bib59","volume-title":"National Casemix Office HRG4+ 201819 Payment Grouper","author":"NHS Digital","year":"2019"},{"key":"key20210408125743471_ref1-bib60","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"487","DOI":"10.1002\/hec.944","article-title":"Estimating mean QALYs in trial-based cost-effectiveness analysis: the importance of controlling for baseline utility","volume":"14","author":"Manca","year":"2005","journal-title":"Health Econ"},{"key":"key20210408125743471_ref1-bib61","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"377","DOI":"10.1002\/sim.4067","article-title":"Multiple imputation using chained equations: issues and guidance for practice","volume":"30","author":"White","year":"2011","journal-title":"Stat Med"},{"key":"key20210408125743471_ref1-bib62","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1177\/096228029900800102","article-title":"Multiple imputation: a primer","volume":"8","author":"Schafer","year":"1999","journal-title":"Stat Methods Med Res"},{"key":"key20210408125743471_ref1-bib63","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"367","DOI":"10.1007\/s10198-013-0471-6","article-title":"Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement","volume":"14","author":"Husereau","year":"2013","journal-title":"Eur J Health Econ"},{"key":"key20210408125743471_ref1-bib64","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1002\/9780470316696","volume-title":"Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys","author":"Rubin","year":"1987"},{"key":"key20210408125743471_ref1-bib65","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"779","DOI":"10.1002\/hec.635","article-title":"Representing uncertainty: the role of cost-effectiveness acceptability curves","volume":"10","author":"Fenwick","year":"2001","journal-title":"Health Econ"},{"key":"key20210408125743471_ref1-bib66","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"7","DOI":"10.1002\/hec.3564","article-title":"Valuing health-related quality of life: an EQ-5D-5L value set for England","volume":"27","author":"Devlin","year":"2018","journal-title":"Health Econ"},{"key":"key20210408125743471_ref1-bib67","unstructured":"NHS Digital. NHS Digital Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) Analysis Guide. Leeds: NHS Digital; June 2019."},{"key":"key20210408125743471_ref1-bib68","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1093","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1912658","article-title":"Surgery versus conservative care for persistent sciatica lasting 4 to 12 months","volume":"382","author":"Bailey","year":"2020","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"key20210408125743471_ref1-bib69","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"49","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jval.2017.09.004","article-title":"EQ-5D-5L versus EQ-5D-3L: the impact on cost effectiveness in the United Kingdom","volume":"21","author":"Hernandez Alava","year":"2018","journal-title":"Value Health"},{"key":"key20210408125743471_ref1-bib70","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"678","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000000220","article-title":"Estimating EQ-5D values from the Oswestry Disability Index and numeric rating scales for back and leg pain","volume":"39","author":"Carreon","year":"2014","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"key20210408125743471_ref1-bib71","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1024","DOI":"10.1002\/hec.3654","article-title":"Missing data in trial-based cost-effectiveness analysis: an incomplete journey","volume":"27","author":"Leurent","year":"2018","journal-title":"Health Econ"},{"key":"key20210408125743471_ref1-bib72","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"650","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jval.2012.03.004","article-title":"Development of a database of instruments for resource-use measurement: purpose, feasibility, and design","volume":"15","author":"Ridyard","year":"2012","journal-title":"Value Health"},{"key":"key20210408125743471_ref1-bib73","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"755","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000001894","article-title":"Pain recurrence after discectomy for symptomatic lumbar disc herniation","volume":"42","author":"Suri","year":"2017","journal-title":"Spine"}],"container-title":["Health Technology Assessment"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/njl-admin.nihr.ac.uk\/document\/download\/2036354","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk\/publications\/hta25240\/hta25240.xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/njl-admin.nihr.ac.uk\/document\/download\/2036354","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,8,15]],"date-time":"2023-08-15T15:38:10Z","timestamp":1692113890000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk\/hta\/hta25240"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,4]]},"references-count":73,"journal-issue":{"issue":"24","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,4]]}},"alternative-id":["10.3310\/hta25240"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3310\/hta25240","relation":{},"ISSN":["1366-5278","2046-4924"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1366-5278","type":"print"},{"value":"2046-4924","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,4]]},"assertion":[{"value":"This content has been made freely available to all.","name":"free","label":"Free to read"},{"value":"7-2014","name":"contractual_start_date","label":"Contractual start date","group":{"name":"article_history","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"12-2019","name":"editorial_review_begun","label":"Editorial review begun","group":{"name":"article_history","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"6-2020","name":"accepted_for_publication","label":"Accepted for publication","group":{"name":"article_history","label":"Article History"}}]}}