{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,29]],"date-time":"2026-09-29T08:44:30Z","timestamp":1790671470999,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":308,"publisher":"National Institute for Health and Care Research","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,1]],"date-time":"2025-05-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1746057600000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100000664","name":"Health Technology Assessment programme","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["17\/19\/10"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["17\/19\/10"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100000664","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Health Technol Assess"],"abstract":"<jats:sec id=\"abs1-1\"><jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>In the United Kingdom, pregnant women are offered two scans: at 11\u201314 and 18\u201320 weeks\u2019 gestation. Current guidance supports fetal anatomical screening at the second scan, but evidence suggests earlier detection is possible.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>\n<jats:sec id=\"abs1-2\"><jats:title>Objectives<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>To determine clinical and cost-effectiveness of a detailed two-dimensional ultrasound scan in the first trimester for detection of fetal anomalies, in addition to usual practice.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>\n<jats:sec id=\"abs1-3\"><jats:title>Design<\/jats:title>\n<jats:list list-type=\"order\">\n<jats:list-item><jats:p>Systematic review and meta-analysis.<\/jats:p><\/jats:list-item>\n<jats:list-item><jats:p>Nationwide survey.<\/jats:p><\/jats:list-item>\n<jats:list-item><jats:p>Analysis of National Congenital Anomaly Disease Registry data.<\/jats:p><\/jats:list-item>\n<jats:list-item><jats:p>Consensus procedure.<\/jats:p><\/jats:list-item>\n<jats:list-item><jats:p>Prospective survey of parental opinions.<\/jats:p><\/jats:list-item>\n<jats:list-item><jats:p>Probabilistic decision-analytic model for cost-effectiveness.<\/jats:p><\/jats:list-item>\n<jats:list-item><jats:p>Value-of-information analysis.<\/jats:p><\/jats:list-item>\n<\/jats:list>\n<\/jats:sec>\n<jats:sec id=\"abs1-4\"><jats:title>Setting<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>United Kingdom National Health Service.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>\n<jats:sec id=\"abs1-5\"><jats:title>Participants<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>Pregnant women and partners.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>\n<jats:sec id=\"abs1-6\"><jats:title>Interventions<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>Detailed anomaly ultrasound at 11\u201314 weeks\u2019 gestation, in addition to usual practice.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>\n<jats:sec id=\"abs1-7\"><jats:title>Main outcome measures<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>Diagnostic accuracy, protocol development, health economic modelling and value-of-information analysis.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>\n<jats:sec id=\"abs1-8\"><jats:title>Data sources<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>MEDLINE (OvidSP), EMBASE (OvidSP), Science Citation Index and Conference Proceedings Citation Index-Science (Web of Science Core Collection); National Congenital Anomaly Disease Registry; European Congenital Anomalies Registry; Surveys of National Health Service Trusts; screening sonographers, midwives and doctors; and parents; National Schedule of National Health Service Costs (2019\u201320).<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>\n<jats:sec id=\"abs1-9\"><jats:title>Review methods<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>Systematic review and meta-analysis for diagnostic accuracy.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>\n<jats:sec id=\"abs1-10\"><jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>First-trimester ultrasound detects 93.3% (95% confidence interval 90.4% to 95.7%) of a pre-selected group of eight major anomalies with specificity of 99.99% (95% confidence interval 99.98% to 99.99%) and positive predictive value of 96.5% (95% confidence interval 93.3 to 98.8, 416,877 fetuses, 40 studies). For major cardiac anomalies, the respective data are 55.8% (95% confidence interval 45.9% to 65.5%), 99.98% (95% confidence interval 99.97% to 99.99%) and 94.85% (95% confidence interval 91.63% to 97.32%, 306,872 fetuses, 45 studies). Of NHS trusts surveyed, 77% currently perform first-trimester anatomy assessment, with evidence of inequity of care; earlier screening resulted in more diagnoses before 16 weeks\u2019 gestation. A consensus procedure (<jats:italic>n<\/jats:italic>\u2005=\u2005172) developed an anatomical protocol and minimum targets for diagnosis. Parental survey (<jats:italic>n<\/jats:italic>\u2005=\u20051374) indicated that over 90% would opt for such screening. Modelling of singleton pregnancies undergoing earlier anomaly screening using two-dimensional ultrasound was associated with increased mean healthcare costs per woman (\u00a311, 95% confidence interval \u00a31 to \u00a329) and maternal quality-adjusted life-years (0.002065, 95% confidence interval 0.000565 to 0.00358), an incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year of \u00a35270, with likelihood of being cost-effective at \u00a320,000 per quality-adjusted life-year of over 95%. Additional modelling predicted reductions in infant healthcare costs and quality-adjusted life-years. Decision uncertainty was low. Value-of-information analysis of cost-effectiveness results showed no groups of parameters for which further research to reduce uncertainty would likely prove cost-effective.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>\n<jats:sec id=\"abs1-11\"><jats:title>Limitations<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>Study heterogeneity; the lack of a universal reference standard; simplifying assumptions relating to economic model structure; and estimation of some parameters are documented and justified. The rarity of the conditions made estimation of longer-term maternal and infant costs and quality-adjusted life-years challenging, resulting in likely under-estimation of healthcare costs.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>\n<jats:sec id=\"abs1-12\"><jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>With standardisation and training, first-trimester ultrasound screening for fetal anomalies is clinically effective with over 90% detection for eight major conditions and low false-positive rates. Decision uncertainty around implementation is low and a prospective study would not be an efficient investment. Adding first-trimester anomaly screening to the current screening likely represents a cost-effective use of resources and is acceptable to parents.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>\n<jats:sec id=\"abs1-13\"><jats:title>Future work<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>Focus on developing an implementation framework to modify the current United Kingdom Fetal Anomaly Screening Programme.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>\n<jats:sec id=\"abs1-14\"><jats:title>Study registration<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42018111781 and CRD42018112434.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>\n<jats:sec id=\"abs1-15\"><jats:title>Funding<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme (NIHR award ref: 17\/19\/10) and is published in full in <jats:italic>Health Technology Assessment<\/jats:italic>; Vol. 29, No. 22. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.3310\/nltp7102","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,2]],"date-time":"2025-06-02T15:44:13Z","timestamp":1748879053000},"page":"1-250","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3310\/crossmarkpolicy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":6,"title":["Clinical and cost-effectiveness of detailed anomaly ultrasound screening in the first trimester: a mixed-methods study"],"prefix":"10.3310","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-1199-6283","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Jehan N","family":"Karim","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Oxford, Oxford, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-2070-7794","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Helen","family":"Campbell","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Oxford, Oxford, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Pranav","family":"Pandya","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-8369-1577","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Edward C F","family":"Wilson","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Exeter University, Exeter, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-9276-518X","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Zarko","family":"Alfirevic","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Liverpool Women\u2019s NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-7078-5646","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Trish","family":"Chudleigh","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0003-9451-7544","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Elizabeth","family":"Duff","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"National Childbirth Trust, Cambridge, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-1318-0074","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Jane","family":"Fisher","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Antenatal Results and Choices, London, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Hilary","family":"Goodman","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Hampshire Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Hampshire, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-6082-3151","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Lisa","family":"Hinton","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Oxford, Oxford, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-3147-6613","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Christos","family":"Ioannou","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-5500-2247","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Edmund","family":"Juszczak","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-3205-6511","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Louise","family":"Linsell","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Oxford, Oxford, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Heather L","family":"Longworth","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Liverpool Women\u2019s NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-1266-0711","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Kypros H","family":"Nicolaides","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"King\u2019s College Hospital, London, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Anne","family":"Rhodes","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Tiny Tickers, London, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-2124-0997","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Gordon","family":"Smith","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-5531-4301","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Basky","family":"Thilaganathan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"St George\u2019s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-9764-6876","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Jim","family":"Thornton","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Gillian","family":"Yaz","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Oxford, Oxford, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-2233-6544","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Oliver","family":"Rivero-Arias","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Oxford, Oxford, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-8143-2232","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Aris T","family":"Papageorghiou","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Oxford, Oxford, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"6221","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,5]]},"reference":[{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref1-bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"211","DOI":"10.1576\/toag.13.4.211.27685","article-title":"Fetal anomaly ultrasound scanning: the development of a national programme for England","volume":"13","author":"Ward","year":"2011","journal-title":"Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref3-bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"102","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.12342","article-title":"ISUOG practice guidelines: performance of first-trimester fetal ultrasound scan","volume":"41","author":"Salomon","year":"2013","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref4-bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"7","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.2637","article-title":"Screening for fetal aneuploidies at 11 to 13 weeks","volume":"31","author":"Nicolaides","year":"2011","journal-title":"Prenat Diagn"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref5-bib5","volume-title":"First Trimester Ultrasound Diagnosis of Fetal Abnormalities","author":"Abuhamad","year":"2017"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref6-bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"561","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.06.002","article-title":"Early fetal anatomical sonography","volume":"26","author":"Donnelly","year":"2012","journal-title":"Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref7-bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"45","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.17286","article-title":"Impact of holoprosencephaly, exomphalos, megacystis and increased nuchal translucency on first-trimester screening for chromosomal abnormalities","volume":"50","author":"Syngelaki","year":"2017","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref8-bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"542","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.7663","article-title":"Two-stage first-trimester screening for trisomy 21 by ultrasound assessment and biochemical testing","volume":"36","author":"Kagan","year":"2010","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref9-bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"730","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.1775","article-title":"Assessment of fetal anatomy at the 11\u201314-week ultrasound examination","volume":"24","author":"Souka","year":"2004","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref10-bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"675","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2011.587058","article-title":"Detailed fetal anatomy assessment in the first trimester at 11, 12 and 13 weeks of gestation","volume":"25","author":"Luchi","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref11-bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"468","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.20844","article-title":"Diagnosis of fetal non-chromosomal abnormalities on routine ultrasound examination at 11\u201313 weeks\u2019 gestation","volume":"54","author":"Syngelaki","year":"2019","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref12-bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"396.e391","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.10.037","article-title":"Routine first-trimester ultrasound screening using a standardized anatomical protocol","volume":"224","author":"Liao","year":"2021","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref13-bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"F384","DOI":"10.1136\/adc.2008.137919","article-title":"Ultrasound structural fetal anomaly screening: an update","volume":"94","author":"Pathak","year":"2009","journal-title":"Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref14-bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2","DOI":"10.1258\/jms.2011.010139","article-title":"Monitoring the prenatal detection of structural fetal congenital anomalies in England and Wales: register-based study","volume":"18","author":"Boyd","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Med Screen"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref15-bib15","volume-title":"Prevalence Charts and Tables for Congenital Fetal Anomalies (UK) 2013\u20132019","author":"EUROCAT","year":"2022"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref16-bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"90","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.2642","article-title":"Challenges in the diagnosis of fetal non-chromosomal abnormalities at 11\u201313 weeks","volume":"31","author":"Syngelaki","year":"2011","journal-title":"Prenat Diagn"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref17-bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"141","DOI":"10.1515\/jpm-2013-0130","article-title":"Evaluation of the role of first-trimester obstetric ultrasound in the detection of major anomalies: a systematic review","volume":"42","author":"Farraposo","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Perinat Med"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref18-bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1160","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000015","article-title":"Accuracy of ultrasonography at 11\u201314 weeks of gestation for detection of fetal structural anomalies: a systematic review","volume":"122","author":"Rossi","year":"2013","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref19-bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"429","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.17246","article-title":"Systematic review of first trimester ultrasound screening in detecting fetal structural anomalies and factors affecting screening performance","volume":"50","author":"Karim","year":"2017","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref20-bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.2685","article-title":"A model for a new pyramid of prenatal care based on the 11 to 13 weeks\u2019 assessment","volume":"31","author":"Nicolaides","year":"2011","journal-title":"Prenat Diagn"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref21-bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e0245938","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0245938","article-title":"Psychological outcomes, knowledge and preferences of pregnant women on first-trimester screening for fetal structural abnormalities: a prospective cohort study","volume":"16","author":"Bardi","year":"2021","journal-title":"PLOS ONE"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref22-bib22","unstructured":"Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Termination of Pregnancy for Fetal Abnormality in England, Scotland and Wales. 2010. Report of a working party. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. URL: https:\/\/www.rcog.org.uk\/guidance\/browse-all-guidance\/other-guidelines-and-reports\/termination-of-pregnancy-for-fetal-abnormality-in-england-scotland-and-wales\/"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref23-bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"91","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ogrm.2019.12.003","article-title":"Advancing fetal therapy in the United Kingdom","volume":"30","author":"Sacco","year":"2020","journal-title":"Obstet Gynaecol Reprod Med"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref24-bib24","first-page":"432","article-title":"Fetal gene transfer","volume":"9","author":"Waddington","year":"2007","journal-title":"Curr Opin Mol Ther"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref25-bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"105","DOI":"10.3171\/2019.4.PEDS18383","article-title":"Fetal surgery for spina bifida: JNSPG 75th anniversary invited review article","volume":"24","author":"Dewan","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Pediatr"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref26-bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"6","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1479-828X.2008.00940.x","article-title":"An overview of the literature on congenital lower urinary tract obstruction and introduction to the PLUTO trial: percutaneous shunting in lower urinary tract obstruction","volume":"49","author":"Morris","year":"2009","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref27-bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"662","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.6115","article-title":"Diagnostic yield of exome sequencing for prenatal diagnosis of fetal structural anomalies: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"42","author":"Mellis","year":"2022","journal-title":"Prenat Diagn"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref28-bib28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"783","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.6140","article-title":"Implementing a rapid fetal exome sequencing service: what do parents and health professionals think?","volume":"42","author":"Mellis","year":"2022","journal-title":"Prenat Diagn"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref29-bib29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"831","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.6165","article-title":"Lessons learnt from prenatal exome sequencing","volume":"42","author":"Chandler","year":"2022","journal-title":"Prenat Diagn"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref30-bib30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"926","DOI":"10.1097\/GRF.0000000000000651","article-title":"The current state and future of fetal therapies","volume":"64","author":"Sparks","year":"2021","journal-title":"Clin Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref31-bib31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"546","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.950","article-title":"Attitudes towards termination of pregnancy among Hong Kong Chinese women attending prenatal diagnosis counselling clinic","volume":"24","author":"Leung","year":"2004","journal-title":"Prenat Diagn"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref32-bib32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"977","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.2600","article-title":"Attitudes of pregnant women regarding termination of pregnancy for fetal abnormality","volume":"30","author":"Souka","year":"2010","journal-title":"Prenat Diagn"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref33-bib33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"689","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2008.01700.x","article-title":"Survey of prenatal screening policies in Europe for structural malformations and chromosome anomalies, and their impact on detection and termination rates for neural tube defects and Down\u2019s syndrome","volume":"115","author":"Boyd","year":"2008","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref34-bib34","volume-title":"Best Practice in Abortion Care","author":"Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists","year":"2022"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref35-bib35","volume-title":"Abortion Statistics, England and Wales: 2010","author":"Department of Health","year":"2011"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref36-bib36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"69","DOI":"10.1080\/02646838.2014.970149","article-title":"Women\u2019s experience of care when undergoing termination of pregnancy for fetal anomaly in England","volume":"33","author":"Fisher","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Reprod Infant Psychol"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref37-bib37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1562","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.6241","article-title":"Medical termination of pregnancy for fetal anomaly at or beyond 20 weeks\u2019 gestation: what are the maternal risks?","volume":"42","author":"Stewart","year":"2022","journal-title":"Prenat Diagn"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref38-bib38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"253","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.1127","article-title":"Long-term psychological consequences of pregnancy termination for fetal abnormality: a cross-sectional study","volume":"25","author":"Korenromp","year":"2005","journal-title":"Prenat Diagn"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref39-bib39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1021","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.2825","article-title":"Women\u2019s experience of termination of pregnancy for fetal anomaly: effects of socio-political evolutions in France","volume":"31","author":"Mirlesse","year":"2011","journal-title":"Prenat Diagn"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref40-bib40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"389","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.1854","article-title":"Psychological outcome in women undergoing termination of pregnancy for ultrasound-detected fetal anomaly in the first and second trimesters: a pilot study","volume":"25","author":"Davies","year":"2005","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref41-bib41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1512","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2010.02712.x","article-title":"Comparing medical versus surgical termination of pregnancy at 13\u201320 weeks of gestation: a randomised controlled trial","volume":"117","author":"Kelly","year":"2010","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref42-bib42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2008","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.283.15.2008","article-title":"Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting","volume":"283","author":"Stroup","year":"2000","journal-title":"J Am Med Assoc"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref43-bib43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"386","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.15762","article-title":"Synthesizing evidence from diagnostic accuracy TEsts: the SEDATE guideline","volume":"47","author":"Sotiriadis","year":"2016","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref44-bib44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"388","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2017.19163","article-title":"Preferred reporting items for a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies: the PRISMA-DTA statement","volume":"319","author":"McInnes","year":"2018","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref45-bib45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"m2632","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.m2632","article-title":"Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies (PRISMA-DTA): explanation, elaboration, and checklist","volume":"370","author":"Salameh","year":"2020","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref46-bib46","volume-title":"Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy","author":"Macaskill","year":"2010"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref47-bib47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"929","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1999.tb08432.x","article-title":"The value of sonography in early pregnancy for the detection of fetal abnormalities in an unselected population","volume":"106","author":"Whitlow","year":"1999","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref48-bib48","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.200","article-title":"Detection of fetal structural abnormalities at the 11\u201314 week ultrasound scan","volume":"22","author":"Carvalho","year":"2002","journal-title":"Prenat Diagn"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref49-bib49","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"159","DOI":"10.1080\/01443610120113300","article-title":"First-trimester pregnancy scanning as a screening tool for high-risk and abnormal pregnancies in a district general hospital setting","volume":"22","author":"Drysdale","year":"2002","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref50-bib50","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"139","DOI":"10.1016\/S0020-7292(02)00192-3","article-title":"Diagnosis of fetal acrania during the first trimester nuchal translucency screening for Down syndrome","volume":"80","author":"Cheng","year":"2003","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref51-bib51","first-page":"273","article-title":"Learning curve in ultrasonographic screening for selected fetal structural anomalies in early pregnancy","volume":"101","author":"Taipale","year":"2003","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref52-bib52","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"912","DOI":"10.1080\/00016340500448438","article-title":"Detection of fetal structural abnormalities by an 11\u201314-week ultrasound dating scan in an unselected Swedish population","volume":"85","author":"Cedergren","year":"2006","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref53-bib53","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"664","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2006.00953.x","article-title":"Detection of malformations in chromosomally normal fetuses by routine ultrasound at 12 or 18 weeks of gestation \u2013 a randomised controlled trial in 39,572 pregnancies","volume":"113","author":"Saltvedt","year":"2006","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref54-bib54","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"393","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2005.08.032","article-title":"Screening for major structural abnormalities at the 11-to 14-week ultrasound scan","volume":"194","author":"Souka","year":"2006","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref55-bib55","first-page":"588","article-title":"Fetal structural anomaly screening at 11\u201314 weeks of gestation at Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital","volume":"89","author":"Srisupundit","year":"2006","journal-title":"J Med Assoc Thai"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref56-bib56","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"666","DOI":"10.1080\/00016340701253405","article-title":"Ultrasound screening for fetal major abnormalities at 11\u201314 weeks","volume":"86","author":"Dane","year":"2007","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref57-bib57","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"181.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2007.03.057","article-title":"Screening for structural fetal anomalies during the nuchal translucency ultrasound examination","volume":"197","author":"Weiner","year":"2007","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref58-bib58","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"136","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.5232","article-title":"Comparison of nuchal and detailed morphology ultrasound examinations in early pregnancy for fetal structural abnormality screening: a randomised controlled trial","volume":"31","author":"Chen","year":"2008","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref59-bib59","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"277","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2007.08.015","article-title":"Detection of fetal structural abnormalities by early pregnancy ultrasound in China","volume":"100","author":"Li","year":"2008","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref60-bib60","first-page":"161","article-title":"First trimester ultrasound: current approaches and practical pitfalls","volume":"36","author":"Oztekin","year":"2009","journal-title":"J Med Ultrasound"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref61-bib61","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1445","DOI":"10.7863\/jum.2010.29.10.1445","article-title":"Role of first-trimester sonography in the diagnosis of aneuploidy and structural fetal anomalies","volume":"29","author":"Abu-Rustum","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Ultrasound Med"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref62-bib62","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1412","DOI":"10.3109\/00016349.2010.517307","article-title":"Comparison of first and second trimester ultrasound screening for fetal anomalies in the southeast region of Sweden","volume":"89","author":"Hildebrand","year":"2010","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref63-bib63","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"505","DOI":"10.1017\/S1047951111000345","article-title":"Results of early foetal echocardiography and cumulative detection rate of congenital heart disease","volume":"21","author":"Hartge","year":"2011","journal-title":"Cardiol Young"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref64-bib64","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"728","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0412.2011.01156.x","article-title":"Implications of a first trimester Down syndrome screening program on timing of malformation detection","volume":"90","author":"Jakobsen","year":"2011","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref65-bib65","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"550","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.3854","article-title":"\u2018Normal\u2019 nuchal translucency: a justification to refrain from detailed scan? Analysis of 6858 cases with special reference to ethical aspects","volume":"32","author":"Becker","year":"2012","journal-title":"Prenat Diagn"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref66-bib66","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"157","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.10070","article-title":"First-trimester detection of structural abnormalities and the role of aneuploidy markers","volume":"39","author":"Grande","year":"2012","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref67-bib67","first-page":"330","article-title":"Detection of fetal major structural anomalies at the 11\u201314 ultrasound scan in an unselected population","volume":"77","author":"Novotna","year":"2012","journal-title":"Ceska Gynekol"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref68-bib68","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1814","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2012.664199","article-title":"Evaluation of a two-step ultrasound examination protocol for the detection of major fetal structural defects","volume":"25","author":"Pilalis","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref69-bib69","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"300","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.12489","article-title":"Improved detection rate of structural abnormalities in the first trimester using an extended examination protocol","volume":"42","author":"Iliescu","year":"2013","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref70-bib70","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1233","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.4235","article-title":"First trimester screening for holoprosencephaly with choroid plexus morphology (\u2018butterfly\u2019 sign) and biparietal diameter","volume":"33","author":"Sepulveda","year":"2013","journal-title":"Prenat Diagn"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref71-bib71","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"986","DOI":"10.3760\/cma.j.issn.0366-6999.20122795","article-title":"Ultrasound screening of fetal structural abnormalities by standard ultrasound views during the first trimester","volume":"126","author":"Wang","year":"2013","journal-title":"Chin Med J"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref72-bib72","article-title":"Utility of first trimester anomaly scan in screening of congenital abnormalities in low and high risk pregnancies","volume":"16151","author":"Natu","year":"2014","journal-title":"JK Sci"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref73-bib73","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2690","DOI":"10.14260\/jemds\/2015\/387","article-title":"First trimester ultrasound: addition of anatomical screening adds value to the examination: a retrospective case series","volume":"4","author":"Andrew","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Evol Med Dent Sci"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref74-bib74","first-page":"24","article-title":"First trimester fetal anatomy study and identification of major anomalies using 10 standardized scans","volume":"9","author":"Colosi","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Prenat Med"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref75-bib75","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"206","DOI":"10.1159\/000363654","article-title":"Is MSAFP still a useful test for detecting open neural tube defects and ventral wall defects in the era of first-trimester and early second-trimester fetal anatomical ultrasounds?","volume":"37","author":"Roman","year":"2015","journal-title":"Fetal Diagn Ther"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref76-bib76","first-page":"57","article-title":"Usefulness of antenatal ultrasound fetal morphological assessments in the first and second trimester: a study at a single Japanese university hospital","volume":"43","author":"Takita","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Med Ultrasound"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref77-bib77","first-page":"165","article-title":"First trimester diagnostic accuracy of a two-dimensional simplified ultrasound technique in congenital heart diseases and great arteries anomalies Acuratetea examinarii ecografice 2D in primul trimestru, folosind o tehnica simplificata, in detectia anomaliilor congenitale cardiace si a anomaliilor de vase mari","volume":"64","author":"Tudorache","year":"2016","journal-title":"Obstet si Ginecol"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref78-bib78","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"421","DOI":"10.1007\/s13224-017-0985-4","article-title":"Risk assessment at 11\u201314-week antenatal visit: a tertiary referral center experience from South India","volume":"67","author":"Vellamkondu","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol India"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref79-bib79","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"463","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.17487","article-title":"Effectiveness of 12\u201313-week scan for early diagnosis of fetal congenital anomalies in the cell-free DNA era","volume":"51","author":"Kenkhuis","year":"2018","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref80-bib80","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1140","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2018.1517306","article-title":"Early fetal morphological evaluation (11\u201313\u2009+\u20096 weeks) accomplished exclusively by transabdominal imaging and following routine midtrimester fetal ultrasound scan recommendations since when can it be performed?","volume":"33","author":"Sainz","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Matern-Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref81-bib81","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2063","DOI":"10.1002\/jum.14561","article-title":"Diagnosis of fetal structural anomalies at 11 to 14 weeks","volume":"37","author":"Vayna","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Ultrasound Med"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref82-bib82","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"619","DOI":"10.1515\/jpm-2018-0436","article-title":"Nearly half of all severe fetal anomalies can be detected by first-trimester screening in experts\u2019 hands","volume":"47","author":"Chen","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Perinat Med"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref83-bib83","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2581","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2018.1555807","article-title":"Detection of structural abnormalities in fetuses with normal karyotype at 11\u201313 weeks using the anatomic examination protocol of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (ISUOG)","volume":"33","author":"Petousis","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Matern-Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref84-bib84","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"11","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.23740","article-title":"First-trimester ultrasound detection of fetal heart anomalies: systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"59","author":"Karim","year":"2022","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref85-bib85","volume-title":"Prenatal Detection Rates Charts and Tables 2015\u20132019","author":"EUROCAT","year":"2022"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref86-bib86","volume-title":"National Congenital Anomaly and Rare Disease Registration Service: Congenital Anomaly Statistics 2019","author":"Public Health England","year":"2021"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref87-bib87","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"371","DOI":"10.1136\/hrt.79.4.371","article-title":"Outcome after prenatal diagnosis of the hypoplastic left heart syndrome","volume":"79","author":"Allan","year":"1998","journal-title":"Heart"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref88-bib88","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"916","DOI":"10.1161\/01.CIR.99.7.916","article-title":"Detection of transposition of the great arteries in fetuses reduces neonatal morbidity and mortality","volume":"99","author":"Bonnet","year":"1999","journal-title":"Circulation"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref89-bib89","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"38","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.3900","article-title":"Immediate and long-term outcomes in children with prenatal diagnosis of selected isolated congenital heart defects","volume":"29","author":"Fuchs","year":"2007","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref90-bib90","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"631","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.14882","article-title":"Prenatal diagnosis of critical congenital heart disease reduces risk of death from cardiovascular compromise prior to planned neonatal cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis","volume":"45","author":"Holland","year":"2015","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref91-bib91","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"F19","DOI":"10.1136\/fn.87.1.F19","article-title":"Prenatal diagnosis of structural heart disease: does it make a difference to survival?","volume":"87","author":"Sullivan","year":"2002","journal-title":"Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref92-bib92","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1123","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.1069","article-title":"Routine fetal cardiac screening: what are we doing and what should we do?","volume":"24","author":"Sharland","year":"2004","journal-title":"Prenat Diagn"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref93-bib93","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"367","DOI":"10.1136\/heart.83.3.367","article-title":"Antenatal diagnosis of heart disease","volume":"83","author":"Allan","year":"2000","journal-title":"Heart"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref94-bib94","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"19","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.7","article-title":"Factors influencing the prenatal detection of structural congenital heart diseases","volume":"21","author":"Wong","year":"2003","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref95-bib95","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"137","DOI":"10.1002\/ijgo.12373","article-title":"Systematic review and meta-analysis of the performance of second-trimester screening for prenatal detection of congenital heart defects","volume":"140","author":"van Velzen","year":"2018","journal-title":"Int J Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref96-bib96","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"747","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.20358","article-title":"Why are congenital heart defects being missed?","volume":"55","author":"van Nisselrooij","year":"2020","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref97-bib97","first-page":"496","article-title":"First-trimester diagnosis of fetal congenital heart disease by transvaginal two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography","volume":"75","author":"Gembruch","year":"1990","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref98-bib98","first-page":"225","article-title":"Early ultrasound diagnosis of fetal congenital heart defects in high-risk and low-risk pregnancies","volume":"82","author":"Bronshtein","year":"1993","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref99-bib99","first-page":"69","article-title":"First-trimester diagnosis of fetal congenital heart disease by transvaginal ultrasonography","volume":"84","author":"Achiron","year":"1994","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref100-bib100","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1023","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(97)08406-7","article-title":"First-trimester transabdominal fetal echocardiography","volume":"351","author":"Carvalho","year":"1998","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref101-bib101","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"297","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0042-105514","article-title":"Quality requirements for the early fetal ultrasound assessment at 11\u201313\u2009+\u20096 weeks of gestation (DEGUM levels II and III)","volume":"37","author":"von Kaisenberg","year":"2016","journal-title":"Ultraschall Med"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref102-bib102","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"251","DOI":"10.1016\/j.siny.2013.05.004","article-title":"Fetal heart defects: potential and pitfalls of first-trimester detection","volume":"18","author":"Khalil","year":"2013","journal-title":"Semin Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref103-bib103","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"86","DOI":"10.4103\/0974-2069.132474","article-title":"Prevalence of congenital anomalies in newborns with congenital heart disease diagnosis","volume":"7","author":"Egbe","year":"2014","journal-title":"Ann Pediatr Cardiol"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref104-bib104","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1206","DOI":"10.1038\/s41436-020-0791-8","article-title":"The prevalence of genetic diagnoses in fetuses with severe congenital heart defects","volume":"22","author":"van Nisselrooij","year":"2020","journal-title":"Genet Med"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref105-bib105","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"102","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.2001.00341.x","article-title":"Nuchal translucency measurement and pregnancy outcome in karyotypically normal fetuses","volume":"17","author":"Michailidis","year":"2001","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref106-bib106","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1260","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2005.06.075","article-title":"Ultrasound detection of fetal anomalies in conjunction with first-trimester nuchal translucency screening: a feasibility study","volume":"193","author":"McAuliffe","year":"2005","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref107-bib107","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"475","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.1442","article-title":"Fetal echocardiography during routine first-trimester screening: a feasibility study in an unselected population","volume":"26","author":"Vimpelli","year":"2006","journal-title":"Prenat Diagn"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref108-bib108","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"249","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.3948","article-title":"Fetal echocardiography at the time of the nuchal translucency scan","volume":"29","author":"Lombardi","year":"2007","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref109-bib109","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"645","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.6374","article-title":"Feasibility and accuracy of fetal echocardiography using four-dimensional spatiotemporal image correlation technology before 16 weeks\u2019 gestation","volume":"33","author":"Bennasar","year":"2009","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref110-bib110","first-page":"221","article-title":"Ultrasonographic diagnosis of fetal structural abnormalities in prenatal screening at 11\u201314 weeks","volume":"15","author":"Oztekin","year":"2009","journal-title":"Diagn Interv Radiol"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref111-bib111","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"817","DOI":"10.7863\/jum.2010.29.5.817","volume":"29","author":"Abu-Rustum RS, Daou L, Abu-Rustum SE. Role of ultrasonography in early gestation in the diagnosis of congenital heart defects","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Ultrasound Med"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref112-bib112","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"676","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.8814","article-title":"Defining the fetal cardiac axis between 11\u2009+\u20090 and 14\u2009+\u20096 weeks of gestation: experience with 100 consecutive pregnancies","volume":"36","author":"Sinkovskaya","year":"2010","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref113-bib113","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"362","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0031-1273465","article-title":"First trimester fetal echocardiography: which planes and defects can be displayed during the daily routine in a prenatal medicine unit?","volume":"32","author":"Krapp","year":"2011","journal-title":"Ultraschall Med"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref114-bib114","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1054","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.2831","article-title":"Fetal cardiac evaluation at 11\u201314 weeks by experienced obstetricians in a low-risk population","volume":"31","author":"Volpe","year":"2011","journal-title":"Prenat Diagn"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref115-bib115","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2546","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2012.703716","article-title":"Detection of congenital heart defects throughout pregnancy; impact of first trimester ultrasound screening for cardiac abnormalities","volume":"25","author":"Eleftheriades","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref116-bib116","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"558","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.4348","article-title":"Simplified first-trimester fetal cardiac screening (four chamber view and ventricular outflow tracts) in a low-risk population","volume":"34","author":"Orlandi","year":"2014","journal-title":"Prenat Diagn"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref117-bib117","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"585","DOI":"10.7863\/ultra.34.4.585","article-title":"Prenatal detection of congenital heart defects at the 11- to 13-week scan using a simple color Doppler protocol including the 4-chamber and 3-vessel and trachea views","volume":"34","author":"Wiechec","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Ultrasound Med"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref118-bib118","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"693","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.5067","article-title":"The three-vessel and trachea view (3VTV) in the first trimester of pregnancy: an additional tool in screening for congenital heart defects (CHD) in an unselected population","volume":"37","author":"De Robertis","year":"2017","journal-title":"Prenat Diagn"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref119-bib119","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"93","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2018.11.030","article-title":"Early fetal ultrasound screening for major congenital heart defects without Doppler","volume":"233","author":"Fern\u00e1ndez","year":"2019","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref120-bib120","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1179","DOI":"10.1002\/jum.14796","article-title":"Contribution of the fetal cardiac axis and V-sign angle in first-trimester screening for major cardiac defects","volume":"38","author":"Zheng","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Ultrasound Med"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref121-bib121","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1389","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2019.1637849","article-title":"The outcome of structural heart defects diagnosed in the first trimester of pregnancy","volume":"34","author":"Duta","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Matern-Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref122-bib122","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"871","DOI":"10.1515\/jpm-2019-0222","article-title":"Fetal heart examination at the time of 13 weeks scan: a 5 years\u2019 prospective study","volume":"47","author":"Ebrashy","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Perinat Med"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref123-bib123","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"169","DOI":"10.2399\/prn.19.0273008","article-title":"The importance of four-chamber and three-vessel (3-V) views in the screening of fetal cardiac anomalies in the first trimester","volume":"27","author":"Erenel","year":"2019","journal-title":"Perinat J"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref124-bib124","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"829","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1999.tb08405.x","article-title":"Early diagnosis of major cardiac defects in chromosomally normal fetuses with increased nuchal translucency","volume":"106","author":"Zosmer","year":"1999","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref125-bib125","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"586","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.372","article-title":"Early prenatal diagnosis of major cardiac anomalies in a high-risk population","volume":"22","author":"Gabriel","year":"2002","journal-title":"Prenat Diagn"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref126-bib126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"570","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.2002.00649.x","article-title":"Early fetal anomaly scanning in a population at increased risk of abnormalities","volume":"19","author":"den Hollander","year":"2002","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref127-bib127","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"14","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.2002.00739.x","article-title":"Cardiac malformations in first-trimester fetuses with increased nuchal translucency: ultrasound diagnosis and postmortem morphology","volume":"20","author":"Haak","year":"2002","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref128-bib128","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"22","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.2002.00733.x","article-title":"Fetal cardiac abnormalities identified prior to 14 weeks\u2019 gestation","volume":"20","author":"Huggon","year":"2002","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref129-bib129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"23","DOI":"10.7863\/jum.2002.21.1.23","article-title":"Diagnosis of congenital cardiac defects between 11 and 14 weeks\u2019 gestation in high-risk patients","volume":"21","author":"Weiner","year":"2002","journal-title":"J Ultrasound Med"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref130-bib130","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"92","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.798","article-title":"Ultrasound screening of fetal structural abnormalities at 12 to 14 weeks in Hong Kong","volume":"24","author":"Chen","year":"2004","journal-title":"Prenat Diagn"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref131-bib131","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1037","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.2119","article-title":"The utility of detailed first trimester ultrasound examination in abnormal fetal nuchal translucency","volume":"28","author":"Bronshtein","year":"2008","journal-title":"Prenat Diagn"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref132-bib132","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"934","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.2071","article-title":"Fetal cardiac scanning performed immediately following an abnormal nuchal translucency examination","volume":"28","author":"Weiner","year":"2008","journal-title":"Prenat Diagn"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref133-bib133","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"296","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.8934","article-title":"Fetal echocardiography at 11\u201313 weeks by transabdominal high-frequency ultrasound","volume":"37","author":"Persico","year":"2011","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref134-bib134","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"563","DOI":"10.7863\/jum.2012.31.4.563","article-title":"Diagnosis of congenital heart disease by early and second-trimester fetal echocardiography","volume":"31","author":"Volpe","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Ultrasound Med"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref135-bib135","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"145","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.9015","article-title":"Use of a high-frequency linear transducer and MTI filtered color flow mapping in the assessment of fetal heart anatomy at the routine 11 to 13\u2009+\u20096-week scan: a randomized trial","volume":"39","author":"Votino","year":"2012","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref136-bib136","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"385.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2013.01.041","article-title":"First-trimester detection of fetal anomalies in pregestational diabetes using nuchal translucency, ductus venosus Doppler, and maternal glycosylated hemoglobin","volume":"208","author":"Miller","year":"2013","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref137-bib137","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"679","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.12517","article-title":"Comparison of echocardiographic findings in fetuses at less than 15 weeks\u2019 gestation with later cardiac evaluation","volume":"42","author":"Zidere","year":"2013","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref138-bib138","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1359","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.13017","article-title":"Sensitivity of first-trimester ultrasound in the detection of congenital anomalies in twin pregnancies: population study and systematic review","volume":"95","author":"D\u2019Antonio","year":"2016","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref139-bib139","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"235","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.4997","article-title":"The added value of detailed early anomaly scan in fetuses with increased nuchal translucency","volume":"37","author":"Zalel","year":"2017","journal-title":"Prenat Diagn"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref140-bib140","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"474","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.21938","article-title":"Diagnosis of fetal defects in twin pregnancies at routine 11\u201313-week ultrasound examination","volume":"55","author":"Syngelaki","year":"2020","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref141-bib141","first-page":"588","article-title":"Fetal structural anomaly screening at 11\u201314 weeks of gestation at Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital","volume":"89","author":"Srisupundit","year":"2006","journal-title":"J Med Assoc Thai"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref142-bib142","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2546","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2012.703716","article-title":"Detection of congenital heart defects throughout pregnancy; impact of first trimester ultrasound screening for cardiac abnormalities","volume":"25","author":"Eleftheriades","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref143-bib143","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2690","DOI":"10.14260\/jemds\/2015\/387","article-title":"First trimester ultrasound: addition of anatomical screening adds value to the examination: a retrospective case series","volume":"4","author":"Andrew","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Evol Med Dent Sci"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref144-bib144","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1473","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(92)91622-H","article-title":"Fetal echocardiography: accuracy and limitations in a population at high and low risk for heart defects","volume":"166","author":"Bromley","year":"1992","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref145-bib145","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"387","DOI":"10.1136\/heart.88.4.387","article-title":"Improving the effectiveness of routine prenatal screening for major congenital heart defects","volume":"88","author":"Carvalho","year":"2002","journal-title":"Heart"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref146-bib146","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"926","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ultrasmedbio.2013.02.007","article-title":"WFUMB policy and statements on safety of ultrasound","volume":"39","year":"2013","journal-title":"Ultrasound Med Biol"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref147-bib147","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"224","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.15866","article-title":"Basic heart examination: feasibility study of first-trimester systematic simplified fetal echocardiography","volume":"49","author":"Quarello","year":"2017","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref148-bib148","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1020","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.23610","article-title":"ISUOG statement on the safe use of Doppler for fetal ultrasound examination in the first 13\u2009+\u20096 weeks of pregnancy (updated)","volume":"57","author":"Salvesen","year":"2021","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref149-bib149","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"35","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ultrasmedbio.2014.08.010","article-title":"Acoustic output measured by thermal and mechanical indices during fetal echocardiography at the time of the first trimester scan","volume":"41","author":"Nemescu","year":"2015","journal-title":"Ultrasound Med Biol"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref150-bib150","first-page":"469","article-title":"Variation of safety indices during in the learning curve for color Doppler assessment of the fetal heart at 11\u2009+\u20090 to 13\u2009+\u20096 weeks\u2019 gestation","volume":"17","author":"Nemescu","year":"2015","journal-title":"Med Ultrason"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref151-bib151","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"438","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.10148","article-title":"Ultrasound safety in early pregnancy: reduced energy setting does not compromise obstetric Doppler measurements","volume":"39","author":"Sande","year":"2012","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref152-bib152","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"110","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.2803","article-title":"A systematic review of the accuracy of first-trimester ultrasound examination for detecting major congenital heart disease","volume":"28","author":"Rasiah","year":"2006","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref153-bib153","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1269","DOI":"10.1002\/jum.14807","article-title":"Applicability of standardized early fetal heart examination in the obese population","volume":"38","author":"Asoglu","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Ultrasound Med"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref154-bib154","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"550","DOI":"10.1161\/01.CIR.96.2.550","article-title":"Congenital heart defects: natural course and in utero development","volume":"96","author":"Yagel","year":"1997","journal-title":"Circulation"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref155-bib155","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"386","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.2001.00385.x","article-title":"Evaluation of prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart diseases by ultrasound: experience from 20 European registries","volume":"17","author":"Garne","year":"2001","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref156-bib156","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"619","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.4023","article-title":"Population-based study of antenatal detection of congenital heart disease by ultrasound examination","volume":"29","author":"Chew","year":"2007","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref157-bib157","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e0239476","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0239476","article-title":"Accuracy of prenatal screening for congenital heart disease in population: a retrospective study in Southern France","volume":"15","author":"Suard","year":"2020","journal-title":"PLOS ONE"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref158-bib158","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"879","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cjca.2013.04.028","article-title":"Effectiveness of prenatal screening for congenital heart disease: assessment in a jurisdiction with universal access to health care","volume":"29","author":"Trines","year":"2013","journal-title":"Can J Cardiol"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref160-bib160","volume-title":"Ultrasound Survey of England 2008: Mapping of 1st and 2nd Trimester Fetal Screening Services in the NHS","author":"Maddocks","year":"2009"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref162-bib162","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"i","DOI":"10.3310\/hta2030","article-title":"Consensus development methods, and their use in clinical guideline development","volume":"2","author":"Murphy","year":"1998","journal-title":"Health Technol Assess"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref163-bib163","first-page":"1","article-title":"The Delphi technique: making sense of consensus","volume":"12","author":"Hsu","year":"2007","journal-title":"Pract Assess Res Eval"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref164-bib164","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"120","DOI":"10.1576\/toag.7.2.120.27071","article-title":"The Delphi technique","volume":"7","author":"Thangaratinam","year":"2005","journal-title":"Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref165-bib165","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"333","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.15884","article-title":"Consensus definition of fetal growth restriction: a Delphi procedure","volume":"48","author":"Gordijn","year":"2016","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref166-bib166","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"609","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.19196","article-title":"Essential variables for reporting research studies on fetal growth restriction: a Delphi consensus","volume":"53","author":"Khalil","year":"2019","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref167-bib167","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"439","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.14761","article-title":"Identification of essential steps in laser procedure for twin\u2013twin transfusion syndrome using the Delphi methodology: SILICONE study","volume":"45","author":"Peeters","year":"2015","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref168-bib168","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"261","DOI":"10.1093\/intqhc\/mzg031","article-title":"Good practice in the conduct and reporting of survey research","volume":"15","author":"Kelley","year":"2003","journal-title":"Int J Qual Health Care"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref169-bib169","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1285","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2009.02281.x","article-title":"Surveying clinical surveys","volume":"116","author":"Chien","year":"2009","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref170-bib170","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"245","DOI":"10.1503\/cmaj.080372","article-title":"A guide for the design and conduct of self-administered surveys of clinicians","volume":"179","author":"Burns","year":"2008","journal-title":"CMAJ"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref171-bib171","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"449","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.4802","article-title":"Maternal attitude towards first trimester screening for fetal abnormalities","volume":"36","author":"Maiz","year":"2016","journal-title":"Prenat Diagn"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref172-bib172","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"33","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.2659","article-title":"Maternal thyroid function at 11\u201313 weeks of gestation in fetal trisomies 21 and 18","volume":"31","author":"Ashoor","year":"2011","journal-title":"Prenat Diagn"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref173-bib173","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1429","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2005.03.064","article-title":"Patient preference regarding first-trimester aneuploidy risk assessment","volume":"193","author":"Sharma","year":"2005","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref174-bib174","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"735","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.1768","article-title":"Factors affecting women\u2019s preference for type of prenatal screening test for chromosomal anomalies","volume":"24","author":"Spencer","year":"2004","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref176-bib176","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"115428","DOI":"10.1016\/j.socscimed.2022.115428","article-title":"Benefits and harms adopted by health economic assessments evaluating antenatal and newborn screening programmes in OECD countries: a systematic review of 336 articles and reports","volume":"314","author":"Png","year":"2022","journal-title":"Soc Sci Med"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref177-bib177","volume-title":"The Green Book","author":"Treasury","year":"2022"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref178-bib178","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e13","DOI":"10.1017\/S0266462321001732","article-title":"Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards 2022 (CHEERS 2022) statement: updated reporting guidance for health economic evaluations","volume":"38","author":"Husereau","year":"2022","journal-title":"Int J Technol Assess Health Care"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref179-bib179","volume-title":"TreeAge Pro 2021","author":"Software","year":"2021"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref180-bib180","first-page":"281","article-title":"Screening for chromosomal abnormalities in the first trimester using ultrasound and maternal serum biochemistry in a one-stop clinic: a review of three years prospective experience","volume":"110","author":"Spencer","year":"2003","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref181-bib181","volume-title":"Listening to Parents After Stillbirth or the Death of Their Baby After Birth","author":"Redshaw","year":"2014"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref182-bib182","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"604","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(15)00836-3","article-title":"Stillbirths: economic and psychosocial consequences","volume":"387","author":"Heazell","year":"2016","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref183-bib183","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e2020028571","DOI":"10.1542\/peds.2020-028571","article-title":"Mortality among parents of children with major congenital anomalies","volume":"147","author":"Fuller","year":"2021","journal-title":"Pediatrics"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref184-bib184","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1093\/oso\/9780198526629.001.0001","volume-title":"Decision Modelling for Health Economic Evaluation","author":"Briggs","year":"2006"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref185-bib185","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1455","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2012.03476.x","article-title":"Congenital lower urinary tract obstruction: a population-based epidemiological study","volume":"119","author":"Malin","year":"2012","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref186-bib186","volume-title":"European Network of Population-Based Registries for the Epidemiological Surveillance of Congenital Anomalies [Internet]","author":"EUROCAT","year":"2019"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref187-bib187","volume-title":"Perinatal Mortality Surveillance Report, UK Perinatal Deaths for Births from January to December 2017","author":"Draper","year":"2019"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref188-bib188","volume-title":"UK Population Norms for the EQ-5D. York Centre for Health Economics discussion paper","author":"Kind","year":"1999"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref189-bib189","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"277","DOI":"10.1177\/0272989X17732990","article-title":"A systematic review and meta-analysis of childhood health utilities","volume":"38","author":"Kwon","year":"2018","journal-title":"Med Decis Making"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref190-bib190","year":"2021"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref191-bib191","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"108","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.14972","article-title":"Healthcare and wider societal implications of stillbirth: a population-based cost-of-illness study","volume":"125","author":"Campbell","year":"2018","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref192-bib192","volume-title":"Unit Costs of Health and Social Care 2021","author":"Jones","year":"2021"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref193-bib193","volume-title":"Paying the Price \u2013 The Cost of Mental Health Care in England to 2026","author":"McCrone","year":"2008"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref194-bib194","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"731","DOI":"10.1093\/humupd\/dmy025","article-title":"The psychological impact of early pregnancy loss","volume":"24","author":"Farren","year":"2018","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Update"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref195-bib195","volume-title":"National Job Profiles: Find Out How NHS Jobs are Matched to Nationally Evaluated Job Profiles","author":"NHS Employers","year":"2021"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref196-bib196","volume-title":"Right-Touch Assurance for Sonographers Based on Risk of Harm Arising from Practice","author":"Authority","year":"2019"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref197-bib197","volume-title":"2020 Live Births, Stillbirths and the Intensity of Childbearing, Measured by the Total Fertility Rate","author":"Births in England and Wales","year":"2020"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref198-bib198","volume-title":"National Life Tables: England and Wales 2017\u20132019","year":"2020"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref199-bib199","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"143","DOI":"10.1007\/s11136-005-0198-7","article-title":"Health status in survivors of cancer in childhood and adolescence","volume":"15","author":"Pogany","year":"2006","journal-title":"Qual Life Res"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref200-bib200","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"291","DOI":"10.1177\/0272989X08327398","article-title":"Estimating preference-based health utilities index mark 3 utility scores for childhood conditions in England and Scotland","volume":"29","author":"Petrou","year":"2009","journal-title":"Med Decis Making"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref201-bib201","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"269","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1741-3729.2010.00601.x","article-title":"Long-term effects of child death on parents\u2019 health related quality of life: a dyadic analysis","volume":"59","author":"Song","year":"2010","journal-title":"Fam Relat"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref202-bib202","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"245","DOI":"10.1016\/j.apnu.2005.07.008","article-title":"Exploring parental grief: combining quantitative and qualitative measures","volume":"19","author":"Arnold","year":"2005","journal-title":"Arch Psychiatr Nurs"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref203-bib203","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"204","DOI":"10.1016\/S1068-607X(98)00144-9","article-title":"Intraoperative blood loss and gestational age at pregnancy termination","volume":"5","author":"Marchiano","year":"1998","journal-title":"Prim Care Update Ob Gyns"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref204-bib204","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"893","DOI":"10.1111\/1467-9566.12554","article-title":"Ultrasound as a technology of reassurance? How pregnant women and health care professionals articulate ultrasound reassurance and its limitations","volume":"39","author":"Thomas","year":"2017","journal-title":"Sociol Health Illn"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref205-bib205","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"225","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1523-536X.2002.00198.x","article-title":"Women\u2019s views of pregnancy ultrasound: a systematic review","volume":"29","author":"Garcia","year":"2002","journal-title":"Birth"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref206-bib206","volume-title":"Psychological Perspectives on Pregnancy and Childbirth","author":"Clement","year":"1998"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref207-bib207","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"775","DOI":"10.1002\/hec.636","article-title":"Methodological limitations of economic evaluations of antenatal screening","volume":"10","author":"Petrou","year":"2001","journal-title":"Health Econ"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref208-bib208","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"59","DOI":"10.1136\/jms.7.2.59","article-title":"Recent economic evaluations of antenatal screening: a systematic review and critique","volume":"7","author":"Petrou","year":"2000","journal-title":"J Med Screen"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref209-bib209","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"253.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.01.032","article-title":"The cost-effectiveness of prenatal screening for spinal muscular atrophy","volume":"202","author":"Little","year":"2010","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref210-bib210","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"iii","DOI":"10.3310\/hta11520","article-title":"A review and critique of modelling in prioritising and designing screening programmes","volume":"11","author":"Karnon","year":"2007","journal-title":"Health Technol Assess"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref211-bib211","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"139","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jval.2020.01.001","article-title":"Value of information analysis for research decisions-an introduction: report 1 of the ISPOR value of information analysis emerging good practices task force","volume":"23","author":"Fenwick","year":"2020","journal-title":"Value Health"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref212-bib212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"311","DOI":"10.1177\/0272989X13505910","article-title":"Estimating multiparameter partial expected value of perfect information from a probabilistic sensitivity analysis sample: a nonparametric regression approach","volume":"34","author":"Strong","year":"2014","journal-title":"Med Decis Making"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref213-bib213","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"584","DOI":"10.1177\/0272989X15578125","article-title":"Computing expected value of partial sample information from probabilistic sensitivity analysis using linear regression metamodeling","volume":"35","author":"Jalal","year":"2015","journal-title":"Med Decis Making"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref214-bib214","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"397","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2005.08.010","article-title":"Sonographic screening for trisomy 13 at 11 to 13(+6) weeks of gestation","volume":"194","author":"Papageorghiou","year":"2006","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref215-bib215","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"51","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.17287","article-title":"Detection rates of a national fetal anomaly screening programme: a national cohort study","volume":"130","author":"Aldridge","year":"2022","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref216-bib216","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"535","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.08.034","article-title":"Fetal transabdominal anatomy scanning using standard views at 11 to 14 weeks\u2019 gestation","volume":"192","author":"von Kaisenberg","year":"2005","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref217-bib217","volume-title":"\u2018Early Diagnosis of Fetal Defects\u2019 in the 11\u201313 Weeks Scan","author":"Fetal Medicine Foundation \u2013 Internet Based Course","year":"2017"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref218-bib218","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1140","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2018.1517306","article-title":"Early fetal morphological evaluation (11\u201313\u2009+\u20096 weeks) accomplished exclusively by transabdominal imaging and following routine midtrimester fetal ultrasound scan recommendations since when can it be performed?","volume":"33","author":"Sainz","year":"2020","journal-title":"J Matern-Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref219-bib219","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"157","DOI":"10.1148\/rg.241035027","article-title":"Detection of fetal structural abnormalities with US during early pregnancy","volume":"24","author":"Fong","year":"2004","journal-title":"Radiographics"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref220-bib220","first-page":"11","article-title":"Yield of a 12\u201313 week scan for the early diagnosis of fetal congenital anomalies in the cell-free DNA era","volume":"11","author":"Kenkhuis","year":"2017","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref221-bib221","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1410","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2016.1214709","article-title":"Adverse fetal outcome: is first trimester ultrasound and Doppler better predictor than biomarkers?","volume":"30","author":"Kumar","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref222-bib222","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"100","DOI":"10.2399\/prn.16.0242010","article-title":"Results of fetal anomaly screening performed at 11\u201314 weeks of gestation at a tertiary center","volume":"24","author":"Kinay","year":"2016","journal-title":"Perinat J"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref223-bib223","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"359","DOI":"10.5005\/jp-journals-10009-1307","article-title":"Prenatal detection of fetal anomalies at the 11-to 13-week scan \u2013 part I: brain, face and neck","volume":"7","author":"Sepulveda","year":"2013","journal-title":"Donald School J Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref224-bib224","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"292","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.7444","article-title":"13\u201314-week fetal anatomy scan: a 5-year prospective study","volume":"35","author":"Ebrashy","year":"2010","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref225-bib225","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"82","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1996.tb09520.x","article-title":"Assessment of fetal anatomy at 12 to 13 weeks of gestation by transabdominal and transvaginal sonography","volume":"103","author":"Braithwaite","year":"1996","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref226-bib226","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"143","DOI":"10.7863\/ultra.34.1.143","article-title":"Detailed transabdominal fetal anatomic scanning in the late first trimester versus the early second trimester of pregnancy","volume":"34","author":"Yagel","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Ultrasound Med"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref227-bib227","first-page":"65","article-title":"The 11\u201313\u2009+\u20096 weeks scan: where do we stand? A 5-year review at Fernandez hospital","volume":"2","author":"Vavilala","year":"2011","journal-title":"Int J Infertil Fetal Med"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref228-bib228","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"241","DOI":"10.1515\/jpm-2018-0145","article-title":"The diagnostic value of a detailed first trimester anomaly scan in fetuses with increased nuchal translucency thickness","volume":"47","author":"Tekesin","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Perinat Med"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref230-bib230","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"338","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.81","article-title":"Megacystis at 10\u201314 weeks of gestation: chromosomal defects and outcome according to bladder length","volume":"21","author":"Liao","year":"2003","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref231-bib231","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"6","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.1784","article-title":"Prenatal diagnosis of severe structural congenital malformations in Europe","volume":"25","author":"Garne","year":"2005","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref232-bib232","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1256","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2001.111071","article-title":"Investigation of the epidemiology and prenatal diagnosis of holoprosencephaly in the North of England","volume":"184","author":"Bullen","year":"2001","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref233-bib233","volume-title":"National Congenital Anomaly and Rare Disease Registration Service: Congenital Anomaly Statistics 2018","author":"England","year":"2020"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref234-bib234","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"442","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.20353","article-title":"Risk of miscarriage following amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling: systematic review of literature and updated meta-analysis","volume":"54","author":"Salomon","year":"2019","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref235-bib235","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"58","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2011.561387","article-title":"Prenatal detection and postnatal management of double outlet right ventricle (DORV) in 21 singleton pregnancies","volume":"25","author":"Hartge","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref236-bib236","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"637","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.21956","article-title":"Diagnosis of major heart defects by routine first-trimester ultrasound examination: association with increased nuchal translucency, tricuspid regurgitation and abnormal flow in ductus venosus","volume":"55","author":"Minnella","year":"2020","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref237-bib237","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"10","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.7646","article-title":"The 11\u201313-week scan: diagnosis and outcome of holoprosencephaly, exomphalos and megacystis","volume":"36","author":"Kagan","year":"2010","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref238-bib238","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1739","DOI":"10.7863\/jum.2011.30.12.1739","article-title":"First-trimester diagnosis of body stalk anomaly using 2- and 3-dimensional sonography","volume":"30","author":"Murphy","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Ultrasound Med"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref239-bib239","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"416","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.1997.10060416.x","article-title":"Body stalk anomaly at 10\u201314 weeks of gestation","volume":"10","author":"Daskalakis","year":"1997","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref240-bib240","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"827","DOI":"10.1002\/ajmg.a.32220","article-title":"The risk of fetal loss following a prenatal diagnosis of trisomy 13 or trisomy 18","volume":"146A","author":"Morris","year":"2008","journal-title":"Am J Med Genet"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref241-bib241","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"469","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.4808","article-title":"Preferences regarding contemporary prenatal genetic tests among women desiring testing: implications for optimal testing strategies","volume":"36","author":"Kuppermann","year":"2016","journal-title":"Prenat Diagn"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref242-bib242","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e0174412","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0174412","article-title":"Maternal psychological responses during pregnancy after ultrasonographic detection of structural fetal anomalies: a prospective longitudinal observational study","volume":"12","author":"Kaasen","year":"2017","journal-title":"PLOS ONE"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref243-bib243","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"711","DOI":"10.1002\/(SICI)1097-0223(199908)19:8<711::AID-PD614>3.0.CO;2-V","article-title":"Preferences of women facing a prenatal diagnostic choice: long-term outcomes matter most","volume":"19","author":"Kuppermann","year":"1999","journal-title":"Prenat Diagn"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref244-bib244","first-page":"511","article-title":"Procedure-related miscarriages and Down syndrome-affected births: implications for prenatal testing based on women\u2019s preferences","volume":"96","author":"Kuppermann","year":"2000","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref245-bib245","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"424","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.892","article-title":"How do women of diverse backgrounds value prenatal testing outcomes?","volume":"24","author":"Kuppermann","year":"2004","journal-title":"Prenat Diagn"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref246-bib246","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"737","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000001029","article-title":"Prenatal testing in the genomic age: clinical outcomes, quality of life, and costs","volume":"126","author":"Kaimal","year":"2015","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref247-bib247","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"153","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1524-4733.2006.00162.x","article-title":"Health-related quality of life measured with EQ-5D in patients treated for depression in primary care","volume":"10","author":"Sobocki","year":"2007","journal-title":"Value Health"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref248-bib248","volume-title":"A Social Tariff for EuroQol: Results from a UK General Population Survey","author":"Dolan","year":"1995"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref249-bib249","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"146","DOI":"10.1002\/ijgo.13413","article-title":"Stillbirths and neonatal deaths among 18 942 women with postpartum hemorrhage: analysis of perinatal outcomes in the WOMAN trial","volume":"153","author":"Hough","year":"2021","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref250-bib250","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"149","DOI":"10.1080\/02646839908409094","article-title":"Should ultrasound scanning in pregnancy be routine?","volume":"17","author":"Baillie","year":"1999","journal-title":"J Reprod Infant Psychol"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref251-bib251","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"i","DOI":"10.3310\/hta4160","article-title":"Ultrasound screening in pregnancy: a systematic review of the clinical effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and women\u2019s views","volume":"4","author":"Bricker","year":"2000","journal-title":"Health Technol Assess"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref252-bib252","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"648","DOI":"10.1097\/GIM.0b013e3181837217","article-title":"Economic methods for valuing the outcomes of genetic testing: beyond cost-effectiveness analysis","volume":"10","author":"Grosse","year":"2008","journal-title":"Genet Med"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref253-bib253","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"657","DOI":"10.1016\/0895-4356(91)90027-7","article-title":"Amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling for prenatal genetic testing: a decision analysis","volume":"44","author":"Heckerling","year":"1991","journal-title":"J Clin Epidemiol"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref254-bib254","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1215","DOI":"10.1016\/0895-4356(94)90126-0","article-title":"Preferences of pregnant women for amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling for prenatal testing: comparison of patients\u2019 choices and those of a decision-analytic model","volume":"47","author":"Heckerling","year":"1994","journal-title":"J Clin Epidemiol"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref255-bib255","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"863","DOI":"10.1097\/00005650-199408000-00008","article-title":"A cost-effectiveness analysis of amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling for prenatal genetic testing","volume":"32","author":"Heckerling","year":"1994","journal-title":"Med Care"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref256-bib256","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"837","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.1517","article-title":"Women\u2019s preferences in screening for Down syndrome","volume":"26","author":"Deverill","year":"2006","journal-title":"Prenat Diagn"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref257-bib257","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"205","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.1970120309","article-title":"The psychological effects of false-positive results in prenatal screening for fetal abnormality: a prospective study","volume":"12","author":"Marteau","year":"1992","journal-title":"Prenat Diagn"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref258-bib258","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"377","DOI":"10.1348\/135910700168991","article-title":"Ultrasound screening for chromosomal abnormality: women\u2019s reactions to false positive results","volume":"5","author":"Baillie","year":"2000","journal-title":"Br J Health Psychol"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref259-bib259","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"979","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.22048","article-title":"Cost-effectiveness of prenatal screening methods for congenital heart defects in pregnancies conceived by in-vitro fertilization","volume":"57","author":"Chung","year":"2021","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref260-bib260","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"39","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.1322","article-title":"Should all pregnant diabetic women undergo a fetal echocardiography? A cost-effectiveness analysis comparing four screening strategies","volume":"26","author":"Odibo","year":"2006","journal-title":"Prenat Diagn"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref261-bib261","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"178","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1523-536x.1999.00178.x","article-title":"Differences in the valuation of birth outcomes among pregnant women, mothers, and obstetricians","volume":"26","author":"Vandenbussche","year":"1999","journal-title":"Birth"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref262-bib262","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"60","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cpr.2016.10.007","article-title":"Posttraumatic stress disorder in parents following infant death: a systematic review","volume":"51","author":"Christiansen","year":"2017","journal-title":"Clin Psychol Rev"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref263-bib263","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"321","DOI":"10.1007\/s10880-018-9590-7","article-title":"The grief of parents after the death of a young child","volume":"26","author":"Morris","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Clin Psychol Med Settings"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref264-bib264","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"268","DOI":"10.1177\/000992288402300505","article-title":"Survival in infants with anencephaly","volume":"23","author":"Baird","year":"1984","journal-title":"Clin Pediatr (Phila)"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref265-bib265","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"649","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(09)61922-X","article-title":"20-year survival of children born with congenital anomalies: a population-based study","volume":"375","author":"Tennant","year":"2010","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref267-bib267","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"392","DOI":"10.3171\/2014.10.PEDS14192","article-title":"Risk factors for hydrocephalus and neurological deficit in children born with an encephalocele","volume":"15","author":"Da Silva","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Pediatr"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref268-bib268","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"503","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000171117.38929.eb","article-title":"Long-term outcomes in children treated by prenatal vesicoamniotic shunting for lower urinary tract obstruction","volume":"106","author":"Biard","year":"2005","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref269-bib269","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"596","DOI":"10.1016\/j.purol.2018.06.005","article-title":"Long-term renal outcome in infants with congenital lower urinary tract obstruction","volume":"28","author":"Berte","year":"2018","journal-title":"Prog Urol"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref270-bib270","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2445","DOI":"10.1007\/s11136-020-02497-3","article-title":"Parental health spillover effects of paediatric rare genetic conditions","volume":"29","author":"Wu","year":"2020","journal-title":"Qual Life Res"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref271-bib271","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"65","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jad.2003.08.004","article-title":"The course of anxiety and depression through pregnancy and the postpartum in a community sample","volume":"80","author":"Heron","year":"2004","journal-title":"J Affect Disord"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref272-bib272","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1748","DOI":"10.1017\/S1047951117001184","article-title":"Responses of mothers of children with CHD: quality of life, anxiety and depression, parental attitudes, family functionality","volume":"27","author":"Alkan","year":"2017","journal-title":"Cardiol Young"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref273-bib273","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e004862","DOI":"10.1161\/JAHA.116.004862","article-title":"Mental health among parents of children with critical congenital heart defects: a systematic review","volume":"6","author":"Woolf-King","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Am Heart Assoc"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref274-bib274","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"952","DOI":"10.1111\/jir.12549","article-title":"A pilot study evaluating depression in mothers with children diagnosed with Down syndrome in state health care","volume":"62","author":"Swanepoel","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Intellect Disabil Res"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref275-bib275","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e020921","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2017-020921","article-title":"What can make things better for parents when babies need abdominal surgery in their first year of life? A qualitative interview study in the UK","volume":"8","author":"Hinton","year":"2018","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref276-bib276","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1355","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jpedsurg.2008.11.034","article-title":"Minor and giant omphalocele: long-term outcomes and quality of life","volume":"44","author":"van Eijck","year":"2009","journal-title":"J Pediatr Surg"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref277-bib277","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"79","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jss.2017.11.054","article-title":"Short-term and family-reported long-term outcomes of simple versus complicated gastroschisis","volume":"224","author":"Arnold","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Surg Res"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref278-bib278","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"726","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jpedsurg.2016.02.012","article-title":"Assessing quality of life in pediatric gastroschisis patients using the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory survey: an institutional study","volume":"51","author":"Carpenter","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Pediatr Surg"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref279-bib279","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"487","DOI":"10.1007\/s00737-011-0243-1","article-title":"Emotional reactivity in infants with congenital heart defects and maternal symptoms of postnatal depression","volume":"14","author":"Solberg","year":"2011","journal-title":"Arch Womens Ment Health"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref280-bib280","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"179","DOI":"10.1093\/jpepsy\/jsq054","article-title":"Long-term symptoms of depression and anxiety in mothers of infants with congenital heart defects","volume":"36","author":"Solberg","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Pediatr Psychol"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref281-bib281","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"406","DOI":"10.1159\/000338895","article-title":"Giant encephalocele: a study of 14 patients","volume":"47","author":"Mahapatra","year":"2011","journal-title":"Pediatr Neurosurg"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref282-bib282","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"125","DOI":"10.1016\/0090-3019(93)90122-H","article-title":"Long-term outcome in surgically treated encephalocele","volume":"40","author":"Date","year":"1993","journal-title":"Surg Neurol"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref283-bib283","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"254","DOI":"10.3171\/PED.2008.2.10.254","article-title":"Clinical predictors of developmental outcome in patients with cephaloceles","volume":"2","author":"Lo","year":"2008","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Pediatr"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref284-bib284","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"269","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pcl.2018.09.008","article-title":"Long-term outcomes of kidney transplantation in children","volume":"66","author":"Winterberg","year":"2019","journal-title":"Pediatr Clin North Am"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref285-bib285","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"59","DOI":"10.1186\/1477-7525-11-59","article-title":"Minimal clinically important differences for the EQ-5D and QWB-SA in Post-traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD): results from a Doubly Randomized Preference Trial (DRPT)","volume":"11","author":"Le","year":"2013","journal-title":"Health Qual Life Outcomes"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref286-bib286","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"203","DOI":"10.1097\/00005650-200503000-00003","article-title":"US valuation of the EQ-5D health states: development and testing of the D1 valuation model","volume":"43","author":"Shaw","year":"2005","journal-title":"Med Care"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref287-bib287","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"181","DOI":"10.3109\/01674829109078000","article-title":"Psychological reactions to pregnancy loss after prenatal diagnostic testing: preliminary results","volume":"12","author":"Robinson","year":"1991","journal-title":"J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref288-bib288","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"207","DOI":"10.1089\/jpm.2010.0291","article-title":"Follow-up study of complicated grief among parents eighteen months after a child\u2019s death in the pediatric intensive care unit","volume":"14","author":"Meert","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Palliat Med"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref289-bib289","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"65","DOI":"10.1016\/0165-1781(95)02757-2","article-title":"Inventory of Complicated Grief: a scale to measure maladaptive symptoms of loss","volume":"59","author":"Prigerson","year":"1995","journal-title":"Psychiatry Res"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref290-bib290","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"865","DOI":"10.1111\/ped.13936","article-title":"Mothers of 0-3-year-old children with Down syndrome: effects on quality of life","volume":"61","author":"Senses Dinc","year":"2019","journal-title":"Pediatr Int"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref291-bib291","volume-title":"England and Wales 2017\u20132019","author":"National Life Tables","year":"2020"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref292-bib292","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"721","DOI":"10.1002\/bdra.23301","article-title":"Birth prevalence and survival of exomphalos in England and Wales: 2005 to 2011","volume":"100","author":"Springett","year":"2014","journal-title":"Birth Defects Res Clin Mol Teratol"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref293-bib293","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1403","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jpedsurg.2006.04.015","article-title":"Current outcome of antenatally diagnosed exomphalos: an 11 year review","volume":"41","author":"Lakasing","year":"2006","journal-title":"J Pediatr Surg"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref294-bib294","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2512","DOI":"10.1002\/ajmg.a.36127","article-title":"Survival of trisomy 18 (Edwards syndrome) and trisomy 13 (Patau Syndrome) in England and Wales: 2004\u20132011","volume":"161","author":"Wu","year":"2013","journal-title":"Am J Med Genet A"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref295-bib295","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"d6749","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.d6749","article-title":"One year outcomes from national cohort study","volume":"343","author":"Bradnock","year":"2011","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref296-bib296","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"874","DOI":"10.1007\/s00467-004-1474-4","article-title":"Prognostic factors of posterior urethral valves and the role of antenatal detection","volume":"19","author":"Ylinen","year":"2004","journal-title":"Pediatr Nephrol"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref297-bib297","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"368","DOI":"10.1002\/ajmg.a.38013","article-title":"Critical congenital heart defects and abnormal levels of routinely collected first- and second-trimester biomarkers","volume":"173","author":"Borelli","year":"2017","journal-title":"Am J Med Genet A"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref298-bib298","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e59734","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0059734","article-title":"Lifetime costs and outcomes of repair of Tetralogy of Fallot compared to natural progression of the disease: Great Ormond Street Hospital cohort","volume":"8","author":"Hunter","year":"2013","journal-title":"PLOS ONE"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref299-bib299","volume-title":"2019\/20 National Cost Collection data version 2","author":"NHS England","year":"2022"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref300-bib300","volume-title":"Unit Costs of Health and Social Care 2021","author":"Jones","year":"2021"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref301-bib301","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"511","DOI":"10.1016\/S0022-5223(03)00115-6","article-title":"Reoperations and survival after primary repair of congenital heart defects in children","volume":"126","author":"Monro","year":"2003","journal-title":"J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref302-bib302","volume-title":"Fiscal Sustainability Analytical Paper: Fiscal Sustainability and Public Spending on Health","author":"Licchetta","year":"2016"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref303-bib303","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"541","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jpeds.2011.06.007","article-title":"Direct health care costs of children and adolescents with Down syndrome","volume":"159","author":"Geelhoed","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Pediatr"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref304-bib304","volume-title":"OECD. Purchasing Power Parities"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref305-bib305","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1594","DOI":"10.1053\/jpsu.2002.36191","article-title":"Morbidity and quality of life in adult patients with a congenital abdominal wall defect: a questionnaire survey","volume":"37","author":"Koivusalo","year":"2002","journal-title":"J Pediatr Surg"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref306-bib306","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"56","DOI":"10.1308\/rcsann.2016.0034","article-title":"Length of stay and cost analysis of neonates undergoing surgery at a tertiary neonatal unit in England","volume":"98","author":"Shetty","year":"2016","journal-title":"Ann R Coll Surg Engl"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref307-bib307","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"13","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2288-5-13","article-title":"Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample","volume":"5","author":"Hozo","year":"2005","journal-title":"BMC Med Res Methodol"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref308-bib308","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"654","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jpedsurg.2007.12.005","article-title":"Gastroschisis: the cost of an epidemic","volume":"43","author":"Keys","year":"2008","journal-title":"J Pediatr Surg"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref309-bib309","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.3310\/hta17590","article-title":"The Percutaneous shunting in Lower Urinary Tract Obstruction (PLUTO) study and randomised controlled trial: evaluation of the effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and acceptability of percutaneous vesicoamniotic shunting for lower urinary tract obstruction","volume":"17","author":"Morris","year":"2013","journal-title":"Health Technol Assess"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref310-bib310","author":"Kidney Care UK and British Association for British Nephropathy"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref312-bib312","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"233","DOI":"10.4103\/1793-5482.228549","article-title":"Neurosurgical interventions for occipital encephalocele","volume":"13","author":"Rehman","year":"2018","journal-title":"Asian J Neurosurg"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref313-bib313","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"8","DOI":"10.4236\/ojmn.2018.84033","article-title":"Surgical repair of encephaloceles in gabriel toure; hospital: review of 17 cases","volume":"8","author":"Sogoba","year":"2018","journal-title":"Open J Mod Neurosurg"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref314-bib314","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1530","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(19)31603-4","article-title":"Antibiotic or silver versus standard ventriculoperitoneal shunts (BASICS): a multicentre, single-blinded, randomised trial and economic evaluation","volume":"394","author":"Mallucci","year":"2019","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"key2025060221062900_ref315-bib315","volume-title":"Children\u2019s Neuroscience Networks (for the Neurosurgical Child) Specification Standards","author":"NHS Specialised Services","year":"2012"}],"container-title":["Health Technology Assessment"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/njl-admin.nihr.ac.uk\/document\/download\/2048011","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk\/sites\/journalslibrary\/files\/journal_data\/NLTP7102\/NLTP7102.xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/njl-admin.nihr.ac.uk\/document\/download\/2048011","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,2]],"date-time":"2025-06-02T15:45:04Z","timestamp":1748879104000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk\/hta\/NLTP7102"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,5]]},"references-count":308,"alternative-id":["10.3310\/NLTP7102"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3310\/nltp7102","relation":{},"ISSN":["2046-4924"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2046-4924","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,5]]},"assertion":[{"value":"This content has been made freely available to all.","name":"free","label":"Free to read"},{"value":"08-2018","name":"contractual_start_date","label":"contractual_start_date","group":{"name":"article_history","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"01-2023","name":"editorial_review_begun","label":"editorial review begun","group":{"name":"article_history","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"11-2023","name":"accepted_for_publication","label":"Accepted for publication","group":{"name":"article_history","label":"Article History"}}]}}