{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,3]],"date-time":"2026-06-03T06:02:51Z","timestamp":1780466571282,"version":"3.54.1"},"reference-count":21,"publisher":"National Institute for Health and Care Research","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,8,1]],"date-time":"2024-08-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1722470400000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100000664","name":"Health Technology Assessment programme","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["13\/04\/107"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["13\/04\/107"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100000664","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Health Technol Assess"],"abstract":"<jats:sec id=\"abs1-1\"><jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>Second trimester miscarriage and preterm birth is a significant global problem. Surgical cervical cerclage is performed to prevent pregnancy loss and preterm birth. It utilises either a monofilament or braided suture. It is hypothesised that a braided material becomes colonised with pathogenic bacteria that causes vaginal dysbiosis, infection and cerclage failure.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>\n<jats:sec id=\"abs1-2\"><jats:title>Objectives<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>The primary objective of the study was to examine the effectiveness of using a monofilament suture material as opposed to a braided suture material on pregnancy loss in women requiring a vaginal cervical cerclage.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>\n<jats:sec id=\"abs1-3\"><jats:title>Design<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>Superiority open randomised controlled trial.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>\n<jats:sec id=\"abs1-4\"><jats:title>Setting<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>Seventy-five maternity sites across the UK.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>\n<jats:sec id=\"abs1-5\"><jats:title>Participants<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>Women experiencing a singleton pregnancy requiring a cervical cerclage.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>\n<jats:sec id=\"abs1-6\"><jats:title>Interventions<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>Monofilament suture or braided suture.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>\n<jats:sec id=\"abs1-7\"><jats:title>Main outcome measures<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>The primary outcome was pregnancy loss (miscarriage and perinatal mortality, including any stillbirth or neonatal death in the first week of life). Secondary outcomes included the core outcome set for preterm birth.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>\n<jats:sec id=\"abs1-8\"><jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>Women were randomised on a 1 : 1 basis to monofilament or braided cerclage utilising a bespoke randomisation service with minimisation dependent on the site, indication for cerclage, intention to use progesterone and planned surgical technique. The inclusion criteria were three or more previous mid-trimester losses or preterm births, insertion of a cerclage in a previous pregnancy, a history of a mid-trimester loss or preterm birth with a shortened cervical length in the current pregnancy or in women who clinicians deemed at risk of preterm birth. The exclusion criteria were an emergency or rescue cerclage, age of &lt; 18 years, being unable to give informed consent or the cerclage having to be placed abdominally. The original sample size was calculated based on a relative risk reduction of 41% from a pregnancy loss rate of 19% in the braided group to 11% in the monofilament group with 90% power and alpha at <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic> = 0.05. The independent data monitoring committee noted a lower-than-anticipated pooled event rate within the trial and recommended an increase in sample size to 2050. The outcome data were collected using clinical record forms from the maternal and neonatal medical records and reported to Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>\n<jats:sec id=\"abs1-9\"><jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>A total of 2049 women were randomised, after withdrawals and loss to follow-up, data on 1005 women in the monofilament group and 993 women in the braided group were included. The baseline demographics between the groups were similar. There was no evidence of a difference in pregnancy loss rates between the monofilament and braided groups (80\/1003 vs. 75\/993; adjusted risk ratio: 1.05, 95% confidence interval: 0.79 to 1.40; adjusted risk difference: 0.002, 95% confidence interval: \u22120.02 to 0.03).<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>\n<jats:sec id=\"abs1-10\"><jats:title>Limitations<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>The trial did not collect long-term paediatric outcomes. There were no safety concerns.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>\n<jats:sec id=\"abs1-11\"><jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>There was no evidence of a difference in pregnancy loss between a monofilament suture and a braided suture.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>\n<jats:sec id=\"abs1-12\"><jats:title>Future work<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>Long-term follow-up of neonates born within the C-STICH (cerclage suture type for an insufficient cervix and its effects on health outcomes) trial.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>\n<jats:sec id=\"abs1-13\"><jats:title>Trial registration<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>This trial is registered as ISRCTN15373349.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>\n<jats:sec id=\"abs1-14\"><jats:title>Funding<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme (NIHR award ref: 13\/04\/107) and is published in full in <jats:italic>Health Technology Assessment<\/jats:italic>; Vol. 28, No. 40. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.3310\/yktw8402","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,9,6]],"date-time":"2024-09-06T11:39:01Z","timestamp":1725622741000},"page":"1-44","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3310\/crossmarkpolicy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":4,"title":["Cerclage suture type to prevent pregnancy loss in women requiring a vaginal cervical cerclage: the C-STICH RCT"],"prefix":"10.3310","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-9817-4313","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Victoria","family":"Hodgetts Morton","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-0473-0532","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Catherine A","family":"Moakes","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-3324-6771","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Jane","family":"Daniels","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-4621-1922","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Lee","family":"Middleton","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-5273-3132","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Andrew","family":"Shennan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Guy\u2019s and St Thomas\u2019 Hospital, Guy\u2019s and St Thomas\u2019 NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-9950-6751","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Peter","family":"Brocklehurst","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-4751-8857","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Fidan","family":"Israfil-Bayli","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Birmingham Women\u2019s and Children\u2019s NHS Foundation Trust, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-3825-4781","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Andrew K","family":"Ewer","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-4169-3141","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"James","family":"Gray","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Birmingham Women\u2019s and Children\u2019s NHS Foundation Trust, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-0758-7583","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Nigel AB","family":"Simpson","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-6031-6953","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Jane E","family":"Norman","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Bristol, Bristol, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-2104-5561","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Christoph","family":"Lees","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Imperial College London, London, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-2516-1180","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Konstantinos","family":"Tryposkiadis","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-2690-6583","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Clive","family":"Stubbs","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-7058-0109","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Max","family":"Hughes","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-1247-429X","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"R Katie","family":"Morris","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-1859-9934","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Philip","family":"Toozs-Hobson","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Birmingham Women\u2019s and Children\u2019s NHS Foundation Trust, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"6221","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,8]]},"reference":[{"key":"key2024090617020000_ref1-bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(08)60040-9","article-title":"Preterm birth: what can be done?","volume":"371","year":"2008","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"key2024090617020000_ref3-bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"416","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.05.042","article-title":"Every 30 seconds a baby dies of preterm birth. What are you doing about it?","volume":"203","author":"Berghella","year":"2010","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"key2024090617020000_ref4-bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"760","DOI":"10.1126\/science.1251816","article-title":"Preterm labor: one syndrome, many causes","volume":"345","author":"Romero","year":"2014","journal-title":"Science"},{"key":"key2024090617020000_ref5-bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e015402","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2016-015402","article-title":"Risk of recurrent spontaneous preterm birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"7","author":"Phillips","year":"2017","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"key":"key2024090617020000_ref6-bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"375.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2009.08.015","article-title":"Multicenter randomized trial of cerclage for preterm birth prevention in high-risk women with shortened midtrimester cervical length","volume":"201","author":"Owen","year":"2009","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"key2024090617020000_ref7-bib7","article-title":"Obstetric outcomes after conservative treatment for cervical intraepithelial lesions and early invasive disease","volume":"11","author":"Kyrgiou","year":"2017","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"key2024090617020000_ref8-bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"516","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1993.tb15300.x","article-title":"Final report of the Medical Research Council\/Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists multicentre randomised trial of cervical cerclage. MRC\/RCOG Working Party on Cervical Cerclage","volume":"100","year":"1993","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"key2024090617020000_ref9-bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD008991.pub2","article-title":"Cervical stitch (cerclage) for preventing preterm birth in singleton pregnancy","volume":"18","author":"Alfirevic","year":"2012","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"key2024090617020000_ref11-bib11","article-title":"Cervical stitch (cerclage) for preventing preterm birth in singleton pregnancy","volume":"6","author":"Alfirevic","year":"2017","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"key2024090617020000_ref12-bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"181","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2013.02.020","article-title":"Transvaginal cervical cerclage: evidence for perioperative management strategies","volume":"209","author":"Berghella","year":"2013","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"key2024090617020000_ref13-bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"472","DOI":"10.1177\/014107688407700606","article-title":"Assessment of sutures for use in colonic surgery: an experimental study","volume":"77","author":"Durdey","year":"1984","journal-title":"J R Soc Med"},{"key":"key2024090617020000_ref14-bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"350ra102","DOI":"10.1126\/scitranslmed.aag1026","article-title":"Relationship between vaginal microbial dysbiosis, inflammation, and pregnancy outcomes in cervical cerclage","volume":"8","author":"Kindinger","year":"2016","journal-title":"Sci Transl Med"},{"key":"key2024090617020000_ref15-bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"119","DOI":"10.1016\/j.mehy.2013.04.003","article-title":"Pregnancy outcome after elective cervical cerclage in relation to type of suture material used","volume":"81","author":"Israfil-Bayli","year":"2013","journal-title":"Med Hypotheses"},{"key":"key2024090617020000_ref16-bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"415","DOI":"10.1186\/1745-6215-15-415","article-title":"Cerclage outcome by the type of suture material (COTS): study protocol for a pilot and feasibility randomised controlled trial","volume":"15","author":"Israfil-Bayli","year":"2014","journal-title":"Trials"},{"key":"key2024090617020000_ref17-bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1584","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2013.870551","article-title":"Cervical cerclage and type of suture material: a survey of UK consultants\u2019 practice","volume":"27","author":"Israfil-Bayli","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"key2024090617020000_ref18-bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"664","DOI":"10.1186\/s13063-021-05629-3","article-title":"C-STICH: cerclage suture type for an insufficient cervix and its effect on health outcomes \u2013 a multicentre randomised controlled trial","volume":"22","author":"Israfil-Bayli","year":"2021","journal-title":"Trials"},{"key":"key2024090617020000_ref19-bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"49","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000001195","article-title":"A core outcome set for evaluation of interventions to prevent preterm birth","volume":"127","author":"van \u2018t Hooft","year":"2016","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"key2024090617020000_ref20-bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1038\/bjc.1977.1","article-title":"Design and analysis of randomized clinical trials requiring prolonged observation of each patient. II. Analysis and examples","volume":"35","author":"Peto","year":"1977","journal-title":"Br J Cancer"},{"key":"key2024090617020000_ref21-bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"711","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(05)17965-3","article-title":"A proposed charter for clinical trial data monitoring committees: helping them to do their job well","volume":"365","author":"DAMOCLES Study Group, NHS Health Technology Assessment Programme","year":"2005","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"key2024090617020000_ref22-bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1426","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(22)01808-6","article-title":"Monofilament suture versus braided suture thread to improve pregnancy outcomes after vaginal cervical cerclage (C-STICH): a pragmatic randomised, controlled, phase 3, superiority trial","volume":"400","author":"Hodgetts Morton","year":"2022","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"key2024090617020000_ref23-bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1007","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000004377","article-title":"Chorioamnionitis and risk for maternal and neonatal sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"137","author":"Beck","year":"2021","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"}],"container-title":["Health Technology Assessment"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/njl-admin.nihr.ac.uk\/document\/download\/2045885","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk\/publications\/YKTW8402\/YKTW8402.xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/njl-admin.nihr.ac.uk\/document\/download\/2045885","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,9,6]],"date-time":"2024-09-06T11:39:22Z","timestamp":1725622762000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk\/hta\/YKTW8402"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,8]]},"references-count":21,"alternative-id":["10.3310\/YKTW8402"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3310\/yktw8402","relation":{},"ISSN":["2046-4924"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2046-4924","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,8]]},"assertion":[{"value":"This content has been made freely available to all.","name":"free","label":"Free to read"},{"value":"12-2014","name":"contractual_start_date","label":"contractual_start_date","group":{"name":"article_history","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"05-2022","name":"editorial_review_begun","label":"editorial review begun","group":{"name":"article_history","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"07-2023","name":"accepted_for_publication","label":"Accepted for publication","group":{"name":"article_history","label":"Article History"}}]}}