{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,31]],"date-time":"2026-10-31T11:58:22Z","timestamp":1793447902314,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":23,"publisher":"University of Toronto Libraries - UOTL","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,2,25]],"date-time":"2022-02-25T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1645747200000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Can. Prosthet. Orthot. J."],"abstract":"<jats:p>BACKGROUND: Patients with neuromuscular knee-instability assisted with orthotic devices experience problems including pain, falls, mobility issues and limited engagement in daily activities.\nOBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to analyse current real-life burden, needs and orthotic device outcomes in patients in need for advanced orthotic knee-ankle-foot-orthoses (KAFOs).\nMETHODOLOGY: An observer-based semi-structured telephone interview with orthotic care experts in Germany was applied. Interviews were transcribed and content-analysed. Quantitative questions were analysed descriptively.\nFINDINGS: Clinical experts from eight centres which delivered an average of 49.9 KAFOs per year and 13.3 microprocessor-stance-and-swing-phase-controlled-knee-ankle-foot orthoses (MP-SSCOs) since product availability participated. Reported underlying conditions comprised incomplete paraplegia (18%), peripheral nerve lesions (20%), poliomyelitis (41%), post-traumatic lesions (8%) and other disorders (13%). The leading observed patient burdens were \u201crestriction of mobility\u201d (n=6), followed by \u201cemotional strain\u201d (n=5) and \u201cimpaired gait pattern\u201d (n=4). Corresponding results for potential patient benefits were seen in \u201cimproved quality-of-life\u201d (n=8) as well as \u201cimproved gait pattern\u201d (n=8) followed by \u201chigh reliability of the orthosis\u201d (n=7). In total, experts reported falls occurring in 71.5% of patients at a combined annual frequency of 7.0 fall events per year when using KAFOs or stance control orthoses (SCOs). In contrast, falls were observed in only 7.2 % of MP-SSCO users.\nCONCLUSION: Advanced orthotic technology might contribute to better quality of life of patients, improved gait pattern and perceived reliability of orthosis. In terms of safety a substantial decrease in frequency of falls was observed when comparing KAFO and MP-SSCO users.\nLayman's Abstract\nPatients who are not able to control the muscles of their legs may need to wear a brace to improve their ability to walk. However, some users are reporting problems including pain, falls, mobility issues and limited engagement in daily activities. The aim of this study was to analyse current real-life burden, needs and experiences of patients who need to wear a brace for their knee, ankle and foot (KAFO). Therefor, experts were interviewed via telephone with a structured set of questions. Eight experts provided observations for patients who suffered from several diseases affecting leg muscle control. The leading patient burdens were identified as \u201crestriction of mobility\u201d, followed by \u201cemotional strain\u201d and \u201cimpaired way of walking\u201d. Potential patient benefits were seen in \u201cimproved quality-of-life\u201d as well as \u201cimproved way of walking\u201d followed by a \u201chigh trust in the brace\u201d. Experts reported a higher number of falls per year when using KAFO without the active control of a microprocessor. On a long-term basis, experts observed consequences of KAFO use as disorders of the back, reduced amount of muscles as well as swelling in areas not covered by the brace, scrub marks and degenerative impact on joints. Braces with active control of a microprocessor might result in better quality of life of patients, improved normal way of walking and perceived trust in the brace. \u00a0\nArticle PDF Link: https:\/\/jps.library.utoronto.ca\/index.php\/cpoj\/article\/view\/37795\/29114\nHow To Cite: Br\u00fcggenj\u00fcrgen B., Braatz F., Greitemann B., Drewitz H., Ruetz A., Sch\u00e4fer M., et al. Experts\u2019 perceived patient burden and outcomes of knee-ankle-foot-orthoses (KAFOs) vs. microprocessor-stance-and-swing-phase-controlled-knee-ankle-foot orthoses (MP-SSCOs). Canadian Prosthetics &amp; Orthotics Journal. 2022; Volume 5, Issue 1, No.7.https:\/\/doi.org\/10.33137\/cpoj.v5i1.37795\nCorresponding Author: Prof. Dr. med. Bernd Br\u00fcggenj\u00fcrgen,Head Institute Health Services Research and Technical Orthopedics, Orthopedic Department - Medical School Hannover (MHH) at DIAKOVERE Annastift Hospital, Anna-von-Borries-Str. 1-7, 30625 Hannover, Germany.\nE-Mail:brueggenjuergen.bernd@mh-hannover.de ORCID ID:https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-8866-0809 <\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.33137\/cpoj.v5i1.37795","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,2,25]],"date-time":"2022-02-25T23:37:17Z","timestamp":1645832237000},"source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":6,"title":["EXPERTS\u2019 PERCEIVED PATIENT BURDEN AND OUTCOMES OF KNEE-ANKLE-FOOT-ORTHOSES (KAFOs) VS. MICROPROCESSOR-STANCE-AND-SWING-PHASE-CONTROLLED-KNEE-ANKLE-FOOT ORTHOSES (MP-SSCOs)"],"prefix":"10.33137","volume":"5","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-8866-0809","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Bernd","family":"Br\u00fcggenj\u00fcrgen","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-4110-0094","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Frank","family":"Braatz","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Bernhard","family":"Greitemann","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-0587-3068","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Heiko","family":"Drewitz","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-8222-8129","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Axel","family":"Ruetz","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-4226-2944","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Michael","family":"Sch\u00e4fer","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-8150-1135","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Wolfgang","family":"Seifert","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-7487-1456","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Friedemann","family":"Steinfeldt","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-7089-1553","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Claudia","family":"Weichold","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-1485-6611","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Daiwei","family":"Yao","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-6526-300X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Christina","family":"Stukenborg-Colsman","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"18618","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,2,25]]},"reference":[{"key":"28377","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"O'Connor J, McCaughan D, McDaid C, Booth A, Fayter D, Rodriguez-Lopez R, et al. Orthotic management of instability of the knee related to neuromuscular and central nervous system disorders: systematic review, qualitative study, survey and costing analysis. Health technology assessment. 2016;20(55):1-262. DOI: 10.3310\/hta20550","DOI":"10.3310\/hta20550"},{"key":"28378","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Fox JR, Lovegreen W. 22 - Lower Limb Orthoses. In: Webster JB, Murphy DP, editors. Atlas of Orthoses and Assistive Devices (Fifth Edition). Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2019; 239-46.e1.","DOI":"10.1016\/B978-0-323-48323-0.00022-6"},{"key":"28379","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"McDaid C, Fayter D, Booth A, O'Connor J, Rodriguez-Lopez R, McCaughan D, et al. Systematic review of the evidence on orthotic devices for the management of knee instability related to neuromuscular and central nervous system disorders. BMJ Open. 2017;7(9):e015927. DOI: 10.1136\/bmjopen-2017-015927","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2017-015927"},{"key":"28380","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Probsting E, Kannenberg A, Zacharias B. Safety and walking ability of KAFO users with the C-Brace((R)) Orthotronic Mobility System, a new microprocessor stance and swing control orthosis. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2017;41(1):65-77. DOI: 10.1177\/ 0309364616637954","DOI":"10.1177\/0309364616637954"},{"key":"28381","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Arazpour M, Ahmadi F, Bani MA, Hutchins SW, Bahramizadeh M, Ghomshe FT, et al. Gait evaluation of new powered knee-ankle-foot orthosis in able-bodied persons: a pilot study. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2014;38(1):39-45. DOI: 10.1177\/0309364613486917","DOI":"10.1177\/0309364613486917"},{"key":"28382","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Tian F, Hefzy MS, Elahinia M. State of the art review of knee\u2013ankle\u2013foot orthoses. Ann Biomed Eng. 2015;43(2):427-41. DOI: 10.1007\/s10439-014-1217-z","DOI":"10.1007\/s10439-014-1217-z"},{"key":"28383","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Deems-Dluhy S, Hoppe-Ludwig S, Mummidisetty CK, Semik P, Heinemann AW, Jayaraman A. Microprocessor controlled knee ankle foot orthosis (KAFO) vs stance control vs locked KAFO: A randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2021;102(2):233-44. DOI: 10.1016\/j.apmr.2020.08.013","DOI":"10.1016\/j.apmr.2020.08.013"},{"key":"28384","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Schmalz T, Pr\u00f6bsting E, Auberger R, Siewert G. A functional comparison of conventional knee\u2013ankle\u2013foot orthoses and a microprocessor-controlled leg orthosis system based on biomechanical parameters. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2016;40(2):277-86. DOI: 10.1177\/0309364614546524","DOI":"10.1177\/0309364614546524"},{"key":"28385","unstructured":"Daines KJF, Farah J, Baddour N, Duke C, Bhatti J, Lemaire ED. Preliminary kinematic and kinetic evaluation of a modular microprocessor-controlled stance-control knee-ankle-foot orthosis. CMBES Proceedings. 2019;42(0)."},{"key":"28386","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Yang BS, Chen YW, Tong JR. User experience of lower-limb orthosis. Assist Technol. 2018;30(5):267-73. DOI: 10.1080\/ 10400435.2017.1322157","DOI":"10.1080\/10400435.2017.1322157"},{"key":"28387","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Borsci S, Londei A, Federici S. The Bootstrap Discovery Behaviour (BDB): a new outlook on usability evaluation. Cogn Process. 2011;12(1):23-31.","DOI":"10.1007\/s10339-010-0376-6"},{"key":"28388","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ravneberg B. Usability and abandonment of assistive technology. J Assist Technol. 2012;6(4):259-69. DOI:10.1108\/ 17549451211285753","DOI":"10.1108\/17549451211285753"},{"key":"28389","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"S\u00f6derstr\u00f6m S, Ytterhus B. The use and non\u2010use of assistive technologies from the world of information and communication technology by visually impaired young people: a walk on the tightrope of peer inclusion. Disabil Soc. 2010;25(3):303-15. DOI:10.1080\/09687591003701215","DOI":"10.1080\/09687591003701215"},{"key":"28390","unstructured":"Klandermans B, Staggenborg S. Methods of Social Movement Research. Boston: University of Minnesota Press; 2002."},{"key":"28391","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Moretti F, van Vliet L, Bensing J, Deledda G, Mazzi M, Rimondini M, et al. A standardized approach to qualitative content analysis of focus group discussions from different countries. Patient Educ Couns. 2011;82(3):420-8. DOI: 10.1016\/j.pec.2011.01.005","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pec.2011.01.005"},{"key":"28392","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Cho JY, Lee E-H. Reducing Confusion about Grounded Theory and Qualitative Content Analysis: Similarities and Differences. Qual Rep. 2014; 19. DOI:10.46743\/2160-3715\/2014.1028","DOI":"10.46743\/2160-3715\/2014.1028"},{"key":"28393","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Santer J, MacDonald S, Rizzone K, Biehler S, Beiswenger T. Strategies for gait retraining in a collegiate runner with transfemoral amputation: A case report. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2021;16(3):862-9. DOI: 10.26603\/001c.23671","DOI":"10.26603\/001c.23671"},{"key":"28394","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Wilson KA, Dowling AJ, Abdolell M, Tannock IF. Perception of quality of life by patients, partners and treating physicians. Qual Life Res. 2000;9(9):1041-52. DOI: 10.1023\/a:1016647407161","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1016647407161"},{"key":"28395","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Tinetti ME, Mendes de Leon CF, Doucette JT, Baker DI. Fear of falling and fall-related efficacy in relationship to functioning among community-living elders. J Gerontol. 1994;49(3):M140-7. DOI: 10.1093\/geronj\/49.3.m140","DOI":"10.1093\/geronj\/49.3.M140"},{"key":"28396","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Maki BE, Holliday PJ, Topper AK. Fear of falling and postural performance in the elderly. J Gerontol. 1991;46(4):M123-31. DOI: 10.1093\/geronj\/46.4.m123","DOI":"10.1093\/geronj\/46.4.M123"},{"key":"28397","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kriegsman DM, Penninx BW, van Eijk JT, Boeke AJ, Deeg DJ. Self-reports and general practitioner information on the presence of chronic diseases in community dwelling elderly. A study on the accuracy of patients' self-reports and on determinants of inaccuracy. J Clin Epidemiol. 1996;49(12):1407-17. DOI: 10.1016\/s0895-4356(96)00274-0","DOI":"10.1016\/S0895-4356(96)00274-0"},{"key":"28398","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ferraro KF, Su YP. Physician-evaluated and self-reported morbidity for predicting disability. Am J Public Health. 2000; 90(1):103-8. DOI: 10.2105\/ajph.90.1.103","DOI":"10.2105\/AJPH.90.1.103"},{"key":"28399","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Smith KV, Goldman N. Measuring health status: self-, interviewer, and physician reports of overall health. J Aging Health. 2011;23(2):242-66. DOI: 10.1177\/0898264310383421","DOI":"10.1177\/0898264310383421"}],"container-title":["CANADIAN PROSTHETICS &amp; ORTHOTICS JOURNAL"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/jps.library.utoronto.ca\/index.php\/cpoj\/article\/download\/37795\/29114","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/jps.library.utoronto.ca\/index.php\/cpoj\/article\/download\/37795\/29114","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,2,25]],"date-time":"2022-02-25T23:37:28Z","timestamp":1645832248000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/jps.library.utoronto.ca\/index.php\/cpoj\/article\/view\/37795"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,2,25]]},"references-count":23,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,1]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.33137\/cpoj.v5i1.37795","relation":{},"ISSN":["2561-987X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2561-987X","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,2,25]]}}}