{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,26]],"date-time":"2026-02-26T15:40:43Z","timestamp":1772120443877,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":38,"publisher":"University of Toronto Libraries - UOTL","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,12]],"date-time":"2025-02-12T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1739318400000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Can. Prosthet. Orthot. J."],"abstract":"<jats:p>BACKGROUND: Evidence based guidelines can assist with prosthetic component selection and clinical intervention. There is limited evidence on lower limb prosthetic prescription guidelines in the South African private health care sector.\nOBJECTIVE: To explore the need for lower limb prosthetic prescription guidelines in the South African private healthcare sector.\nMETHODOLOGY: Three main funders of lower limb prosthetics in the South African private healthcare sector (Road Accident Fund (RAF), Workmen\u2019s Compensation Fund (WCA), and Council of Medical Schemes (CMS)) were explored using a case study design. Data were collected from six regulatory documents, sixteen purposively sampled prosthetic users, who received services from these funders, and seven key informants. Documents were assessed with the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research &amp; Evaluation II (AGREE II), across six domains. Data from users and key informants were collected with telephonic, semi-structured interviews guided by interview schedules. Interview schedules were self-developed and tailored for each participant group. AGREE II data were analyzed descriptively. Inductive thematic analysis was used for interview data.\nFINDINGS: Across cases, the \u201cScope and Purpose\u201d domain scored the highest: 50% (WCA), 47% (CMS), and 22% (RAF). \u201cEditorial Independence\u201d scored 0% for all three cases. Other challenging domains were \u201cApplicability\u201d (WCA: 17%, CMS: 6%, RAF: 6%) and \u201cRigour of Development\u201d (WCA: 8%, CMS: 25%, RAF: 0%). The following three cross-case themes emerged from the interviews: \u201cGuideline Availability and Necessity\u201d showed that guidelines were seldom used and that guidelines could be beneficial; \u00a0\u201cPurpose of a Lower Limb Prosthetic Guideline\u201d indicated that guidelines can support accessible, equitable, ethical, and transparent services; and \u201cGuideline Development Requirements\u201d explained that an evidence based collaborative process, facilitated by an independent body should underscore guideline development.\nCONCLUSION: Evidence based, standardized, transparent guidelines will be beneficial to direct prosthetic service delivery in the South African private healthcare sector. The guidelines must be applicable, rigorously developed, and show editorial independence.\nLayman's Abstract\nGuidelines that provide directions to funders and service providers can help with selection of suitable prosthetic components. There is little information on the use of guidelines in prosthetic service provision in South Africa's private healthcare sector. This study wanted to determine if there was a need to use guidelines for prescribing lower limb prosthetics in South Africa's private healthcare sector and whether guidelines were currently used in the sector. The Road Accident Fund, Workmen\u2019s Compensation Fund, and Council of Medical Schemes were studied. Six documents that guided services at the three organizations were reviewed. In addition, sixteen prosthetic users who received services from the organizations and seven experts were interviewed. The results showed that the scope and purpose of the documents was partially defined. The documents were developed by the organizations and not reviewed by independent stakeholders such as service users. The methods used to develop the documents and the use of evidence during development were poorly described. The documents also do not describe how the guidelines provided can be put into practice, how much it will cost, what barriers to expect, and how these can be overcome. These documents cannot serve as guidelines in their current format. The interviewees felt that guidelines could be helpful to the industry as a way of enabling fair, accessible, and transparent prosthetic services. Guidelines should take current evidence into consideration. The development process that must be driven by an independent organization rather than government or the funders and involve all stakeholders.\u00a0 \u00a0\nArticle PDF Link: https:\/\/jps.library.utoronto.ca\/index.php\/cpoj\/article\/view\/44450\/33671\nHow To Cite: Theron B, Visagie S. Exploring the need for lower limb prosthetic guidelines in South Africa's private healthcare sector. Canadian Prosthetics &amp; Orthotics Journal. 2024; Volume 7, Issue 2, No. 8. Https:\/\/doi.org\/10.33137\/cpoj.v7i2.44450\nCorresponding Author:\u00a0Mr. Bennie Theron, CPO, MScAffiliation: University of Stellenbosch, Division of Disability and Rehabilitation Studies, South Africa.E-Mail: Benjetheron@live.comORCID ID: https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0006-0487-9050<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.33137\/cpoj.v7i2.44450","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,12]],"date-time":"2025-02-12T14:16:41Z","timestamp":1739369801000},"source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"title":["EXPLORING THE NEED FOR LOWER LIMB PROSTHETIC GUIDELINES IN SOUTH AFRICA'S PRIVATE HEALTHCARE SECTOR"],"prefix":"10.33137","volume":"7","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0006-0487-9050","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Bennie","family":"Theron","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-4575-479X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Surona","family":"Visagie","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"18618","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,12]]},"reference":[{"key":"94321","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Buetow SA, Mart\u00ednez-Mart\u00edn P, McCormack B. Ultrabilitation: Beyond recovery-oriented rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil. 2019; 41(6):740-745. DOI: 10.1080\/09638288.2017.1406997","DOI":"10.1080\/09638288.2017.1406997"},{"key":"94322","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Wyss D, Lindsay S, Cleghorn WL, Andrysek J. Priorities in lower limb prosthetic service delivery based on an international survey of prosthetists in low-and high-income countries. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2015; 39(2):102-11. DOI: 10.1177\/0309364613513824","DOI":"10.1177\/0309364613513824"},{"key":"94323","unstructured":"Statistical release P0301.4 [Internet]. Census 2022, Statistic South Africa. 2023; [cited 2024 Dec 11]. Available from: https:\/\/census.statssa.gov.za\/assets\/documents\/2022\/P03014_Census_2022_Statistical_Release.pdf"},{"key":"94324","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Manickum P, Ramklass SS, Madiba TE. A five-year audit of lower limb amputations below the knee and rehabilitation outcomes: The Durban experience. JEMDSA. 2019; 24(2):41-5. DOI: 10.1080\/16089677.2018.1553378","DOI":"10.1080\/16089677.2018.1553378"},{"key":"94325","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Fisher K, Hanspal RS, Marks L. Return to work after lower limb amputation. Int J Rehabil Res. 2003; 26(1):51-6. DOI: 10.1097\/00004356-200303000-00007","DOI":"10.1097\/01.mrr.0000054806.81886.d7"},{"key":"94326","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Donaghy AC, Morgan SJ, Kaufman GE, Morgenroth DC. Team approach to prosthetic prescription decision-making. Curr Phys Med Rehabil Rep. 2020; 8:386\u2013395. DOI: 10.1007\/s40141-020-00289-x","DOI":"10.1007\/s40141-020-00289-x"},{"key":"94327","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Boone DA. The economic value of mobility with a prosthesis. J Prosthet Orthot. 2019;31(1S):32-36. DOI: 10.1097\/JPO.0000000000000231","DOI":"10.1097\/JPO.0000000000000231"},{"key":"94328","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Geertzen J, van der Linde H, Rosenbrand K, Conradi M, Deckers J, Koning J, et al. Dutch evidence-based guidelines for amputation and prosthetics of the lower extremity: Rehabilitation process and prosthetics. Part 2. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2015;39(5):361-71. DOI: 10.1177\/0309364614542725","DOI":"10.1177\/0309364614542725"},{"key":"94329","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Liu H, Chen C, Hanson M, Chaturvedi R, Mattke S, Hillestad RJ. Economic value of advanced transfemoral prosthetics [internet]. California: RAND. 2017; [cited 2024 Dec 11]. Available from: https:\/\/www.rand.org\/pubs\/research_reports\/RR2096.html","DOI":"10.7249\/RR2096"},{"key":"94330","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kannenberg A, Seidinger S. Health economics: The perspective of a prosthetic manufacturer. J Prosthet Orthot. 2019;31(1S):49-54. DOI: 10.1097\/JPO.0000000000000234","DOI":"10.1097\/JPO.0000000000000234"},{"key":"94331","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Graham B. Clinical practice guidelines: What are they and how should they be disseminated? Hand Clin. 2014;30(3):361-5. DOI: 10.1016\/j.hcl.2014.04.007","DOI":"10.1016\/j.hcl.2014.04.007"},{"key":"94332","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Webster JB, Crunkhorn A, Sall J, Highsmith MJ, Pruziner A, Randolph BJ. Clinical practice guidelines for the rehabilitation of lower limb amputation: An update from the Department of Veterans Affairs and Department of Defense. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2019;98(9):820-829. DOI: 10.1097\/PHM.0000000000001213","DOI":"10.1097\/PHM.0000000000001213"},{"key":"94333","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Federici S, Scherer MJ, Borsci S. An ideal model of an assistive technology assessment and delivery process. Technol Disabil. 2014;26(1):27-38. DOI: 10.3233\/TAD-140402","DOI":"10.3233\/TAD-140402"},{"key":"94334","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Brouwers MC, Kho ME, Browman GP, Clancy C, Fairey S, Fletcher RH, et al. AGREE II: Aadvancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in health care. Can Med Assoc J. 2010;182(18):E839-42. DOI: 10.1503\/cmaj.090449","DOI":"10.1503\/cmaj.090449"},{"key":"94335","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sadeghi-Demneh E, Forghany S, Onmanee P, Trinler U, Dillon MP, Baker R. The influence of standards and clinical guidelines on prosthetic and orthotic service quality: A scoping review. Disabil Rehabil. 2018;40(20):2458-65. DOI: 10.1080\/09638288.2017.1335802","DOI":"10.1080\/09638288.2017.1335802"},{"key":"94336","unstructured":"Department of employment and labor. Prosthetic and Orthotics Gazette 2024 [Internet]. Government Gazette of the Republic of South Africa. 2024; [cited 2024 Dec 11]. Available from: https:\/\/www.coidlink.co.za\/Downloads\/Tariffs\/2024\/Orthotics%20and%20Prosthetics.pdf"},{"key":"94337","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sibbald SL, Paciocco S, Fournie M, Van Asseldonk R, Scurr T. Continuing to enhance the quality of case study methodology in health services research. Can J Health Leaders. 2021;34(5):291-6. DOI: 10.1177\/08404704211028857","DOI":"10.1177\/08404704211028857"},{"key":"94338","unstructured":"Road Accident Fund Act 56 of 1996 of the Republic of South Africa [Internet]. Government of South Africa. 1996; [cited 2024 Dec 11]. Available from: https:\/\/www.gov.za\/sites\/default\/files\/gcis_document\/201409\/act56of1996.pdf"},{"key":"94339","unstructured":"Road Accident Fund Act, No. 56 of 1996 [Internet]. Government of South Africa. 1996; [cited 2024 Dec 11]. Available from: https:\/\/www.gov.za\/sites\/default\/files\/gcis_document\/201409\/act56of1996.pdf"},{"key":"94340","unstructured":"Compensation for Occupational Injuries and Diseases Act 130 of 1993 [Internet]. Government of South Africa. 1993; [cited 2024 Dec 11]. Available from: https:\/\/www.gov.za\/sites\/default\/files\/gcis_document\/201409\/act130of1993.pdf"},{"key":"94341","unstructured":"Compensation for Occupational Injuries and Diseases Act 61 of 1997 [Internet]. Government of South Africa.1997; [cited 2024 Dec 11]. Available from: https:\/\/www.gov.za\/sites\/default\/files\/gcis_document\/201409\/a61-97.pdf"},{"key":"94342","unstructured":"Medical Schemes Act 131 of 1998 [Internet]. Government of South Africa. 1998; [cited 2024 Dec 11]. Available from: https:\/\/www.gov.za\/sites\/default\/files\/gcis_document\/201409\/a131-98.pdf"},{"key":"94343","unstructured":"Medical Schemes Act 131 of 1998 [Internet]. Government of South Africa. Government of South Africa. 2004; [cited 2024 Dec 11]. Available from: https:\/\/www.medicalschemes.com\/files\/Acts%20and%20Regulations\/MSREGS19July2004.pdf"},{"key":"94344","unstructured":"What are prescribed minimum benefits [Internet]. Council of Medical Schemes. 2021; [cited 2024 Dec 11]. Available from: https:\/\/www.medicalschemes.co.za\/resources\/pmb\/"},{"key":"#cr-split#-94345.1","unstructured":"CMScript 2-2023 Amputations [Internet]. Council of medical schemes. 2023"},{"key":"#cr-split#-94345.2","unstructured":"[cited 2024 Dec 11]. Available from: https:\/\/www.medicalschemes.co.za\/wpfd_file\/cmscript-2-2023-amputations\/"},{"key":"94346","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Etikan I, Musa SA, Alkassim RS. Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. Am J Theor Appl Stat. 2016;5(1):1-4. DOI: 10.11648\/j.ajtas.20160501.11","DOI":"10.11648\/j.ajtas.20160501.11"},{"key":"94347","unstructured":"Appraisal of guidelines for research and evaluation II [Internet]. AGREE next steps consortium. 2017; [cited 2024 Dec 11]. Available from: https:\/\/www.agreetrust.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/AGREE-II-Users-Manual-and-23-item-Instrument-2009-Update-2017.pdf"},{"key":"94348","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Yan J, Min J, Zhou B. Diagnosis of pheochromocytoma: A clinical practice guideline appraisal using AGREE II instrument. J Eval Clin Pract. 2013;19(4):626-32. DOI: 10.1111\/j.1365-2753.2012.01873.x","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2753.2012.01873.x"},{"key":"94349","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Brouwers MC, Kho ME, Browman GP, Burgers JS, Cluzeau F, Feder G, et al. Development of the AGREE II, part 2: Assessment of validity of items and tools to support application. CMAJ. 2010;182(10):E472-8. DOI: 10.1503\/CMAJ.091716","DOI":"10.1503\/cmaj.091716"},{"key":"94350","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Nowell LS, Norris JM, White DE, Moules NJ. Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. Int J Qual Methods. 2017;16:1-13. DOI: 10.1177\/1609406917733847","DOI":"10.1177\/1609406917733847"},{"key":"94351","unstructured":"Theron BJ. An exploration of the need for lower limb prosthetic protocols in the South African private healthcare sector [thesis]. Stellenbosch: Stellenbosch University. 2024. Available from: https:\/\/scholar.sun.ac.za\/items\/af0fbe14-0e14-49f4-bb21-3962fd4f951a"},{"key":"94352","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Fard B, Persoon S, Jutte PC, Daemen JWHC, Lamprou DAA, Hoope WT, et al. Amputation and prosthetics of the lower extremity: The 2020 Dutch evidence-based multidisciplinary guideline. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2023;47(1):69-80. DOI: 10.1097\/PXR.0000000000000170","DOI":"10.1097\/PXR.0000000000000170"},{"key":"94353","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"McDonald CL, Kahn A, Hafner BJ, Morgan SJ. Prevalence of secondary prosthesis use in lower limb prosthesis users. Disabil Rehabil. 2023;1-7. DOI: 10.1080\/09638288.2023.2182919","DOI":"10.1080\/09638288.2023.2182919"},{"key":"94354","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Handy Eone D, Nseme Etouckey E, Essi MJ, Ngo Nyemb TM, Ngo Nonga B, Ibrahima F. Satisfaction of patients with amputated lower limb wearing external prostheses. Int J Orthop Sci. 2018;4(1f):368-72. DOI:10.22271\/ortho.2018.v4.i1f.52","DOI":"10.22271\/ortho.2018.v4.i1f.52"},{"key":"94355","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hebert JS, Burger H. Return to work following major limb loss. In: Schultz IZ, Gatchel RJ, editors. Handbook of return to work: from research to practice. Boston, MA: Springer US. 2016;505-517","DOI":"10.1007\/978-1-4899-7627-7_28"},{"key":"94356","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Griffet J. Amputation and prosthesis fitting in paediatric patients. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2016;102(1):S161-75. DOI: 10.1016\/j.otsr.2015.03.020","DOI":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2015.03.020"},{"key":"94357","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Schaffalitzky E, Gallagher P, MacLachlan M, Wegener ST. Developing consensus on important factors associated with lower limb prosthetic prescription and use. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34(24):2085-94. DOI: 10.3109\/09638288.2012.671885","DOI":"10.3109\/09638288.2012.671885"}],"container-title":["CANADIAN PROSTHETICS &amp; ORTHOTICS JOURNAL"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/jps.library.utoronto.ca\/index.php\/cpoj\/article\/download\/44450\/33671","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/jps.library.utoronto.ca\/index.php\/cpoj\/article\/download\/44450\/33671","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,12]],"date-time":"2025-02-12T14:17:02Z","timestamp":1739369822000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/jps.library.utoronto.ca\/index.php\/cpoj\/article\/view\/44450"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,12]]},"references-count":38,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,11,15]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.33137\/cpoj.v7i2.44450","relation":{},"ISSN":["2561-987X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2561-987X","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,12]]}}}