{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,14]],"date-time":"2025-05-14T10:23:51Z","timestamp":1747218231488,"version":"3.40.5"},"reference-count":17,"publisher":"East-European Law Research Center","issue":"2","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["AJEE"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,5,15]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>Background: Statistics concerning the use of the European Small Claims Procedure implemented by Regulation 861\/2007 (as amended by Regulation 2015\/2421) show that this mechanism has not been as successful as expected. When choosing between a domestic and a European instrument, the creditor most often opts for the domestic procedure. They avoid an instrument that is less well known, that they do not fully manage, and that has limited integration in domestic law. \nMethods: This article starts with the legislative analysis of the European Regulation 861\/2007, using analytical and hermeneutic approaches. Empirical methodologies will also be applied since the practical application of the rules established by the European Regulation will be analysed in order to build the proposal of an online platform for the small claims procedure. \nResults and Conclusions: Bearing in mind the weaknesses of the European Small Claims Procedure, we conclude that an online platform incorporating alternative dispute resolution mechanisms is the best option to promote access to justice. A list of arbitrators or judges designated by each member state to decide the cases submitted on the platform could be a solution to overcome lengthy court processes. The decision shall be standardised for all proceedings according to a model incorporated into the platform. Thus, the enforceability will be facilitated, and the process will be more accessible to the parties, ensuring the right of access to justice in this context.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.33327\/ajee-18-5.2-a000206","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,3,12]],"date-time":"2022-03-12T17:34:27Z","timestamp":1647106467000},"page":"7-21","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"title":["European Small Claims Procedure: An Effective Process? A Proposal for an Online Platform"],"prefix":"10.33327","volume":"5","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-3491-1921","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Lurdes Varregoso","family":"Mesquita","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-3584-0718","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Catia Marques","family":"Cebola","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"18874","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,3,11]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref0","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Marques Cebola C, \u2018Media\u00e7\u00e3o e Arbitragem de Conflitos de Consumo: panorama portugu\u00eas\u2019 (2012) 6 Revista Luso-Brasileira de Direito do Consumo 11-46.","DOI":"10.33636\/reconto.v1n2.e011"},{"key":"ref1","unstructured":"Marques Cebola C, Mediaci\u00f3n (Marcial Pons 2013)."},{"key":"ref2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Hodges C, Delivering Dispute Resolution. A Holistic Review of Models in England and Wales (Beck\/Hart Publishing 2019).","DOI":"10.5040\/9781509916924"},{"key":"ref3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Esteban de La Rosa F, Marques Cebola C, \u2018The Spanish and Portuguese Systems: two examples calling for a further reform. Uncovering the architecture underlying the new consumer ADR\/ODR European framework\u2019 (2019) 27(6) European Review of Private Law 1251-1278.","DOI":"10.54648\/ERPL2019070"},{"key":"ref4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Ontanu EA, \u2018Incorporating European Uniform Procedures into National Procedural Systems and Practice: Best Practices a Solution for Harmonious Application\u2019 in Burkhard Hess, Xandra E. Kramer (eds), From common rules to best practices in European Civil Procedure (Auflage 2017) 459-480.","DOI":"10.5771\/9783845285214-459"},{"key":"ref5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Ontanu EA, Pannebakker E, \u2018Tackling Language Obstacles in Cross-Border Litigation: The European Order for Payment and the European Small Claims Procedure Approach\u2019 (2012) 5(3) Erasmus Law Review 169-186.","DOI":"10.5553\/elr221026712012005003004"},{"key":"ref6","unstructured":"Katsh E, Rifkin J, Online Dispute Resolution: Resolving Conflicts in Cyberspace(Jossey-Bass 2011)."},{"key":"ref7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"European Commission, \u2018An evaluation study of national procedural laws and practices in terms of their impact on the free circulation of judgments and on the equivalence and effectiveness of the procedural protection of consumers under EU consumer law\u2019 (2017) <https:\/\/op.europa.eu\/pt\/publication-detail\/-\/publication\/531ef49a-9768-11e7-b92d-01aa75ed71a1\/language-en> accessed 7 January 2022.","DOI":"10.2139\/ssrn.3492289"},{"key":"ref8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Inchausti G, \u2018Have the EU Regulations on Judicial Cooperation Fostered Harmonisation of National Procedures?\u2019 in Fernando Gasc\u00f3n Inchausti (ed), The Future of the European Law of Civil Procedure (Burkhard Hess Intersentia 2020) 91-110.","DOI":"10.1017\/9781839700071.005"},{"key":"ref9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Matteucci G, \u2018Mandatory Mediation, The Italian Experience\u2019 (2015) 16 Revista Eletr\u00f4nica de Direito Processual \u2013 REDP 189-210.","DOI":"10.12957\/redp.2015.19964"},{"key":"ref10","unstructured":"Winestone J, Mandatory Mediation: A Comparative Review of How Legislatures in California and Ontario are Mandating the Peacemaking Process in Their Adversarial Systems (2015) <https:\/\/www.mediate.com\/articles\/WinestoneJ4.cfm> accessed 7 January 2022."},{"key":"ref11","unstructured":"Varregoso Mesquita L, \u2018Media\u00e7\u00e3o Civil e Comercial - As modalidades pr\u00e9-judicial e intra-processual como elemento motivador\u2019 (2017) 1 Maia Jur\u00eddica \u2013 Revista de Direito 13-38."},{"key":"ref12","unstructured":"Alexander N, Global Trends in Mediation (Kluwer Law International 2006)."},{"key":"ref13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Alexander N, Chong S, The Singapore Convention on Mediation: A Commentary(Wolters Kluwer 2019).","DOI":"10.2139\/ssrn.3749007"},{"key":"ref14","unstructured":"Rabinovich-Einy O, Katsh E, \u2018Technology and the Future of Dispute Systems Design\u2019 (2012) 17 Harvard Negotiation Law Review 151-199."},{"key":"ref15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Kramer X, \u2018Small claim, simple recovery? The European Small Claims Procedure and Its Implementation in the Member States\u2019 (2011) 12 ERA Forum \u2013 Journal of European Law 119-133.","DOI":"10.1007\/s12027-011-0190-3"},{"key":"ref16","unstructured":"Kramer X, Ontanu EA, \u2018The functioning of the European Small Claims Procedure in the Netherlands: normative and empirical reflections\u2019 (2013) 3 Nederlands Internationaal Privaatrecht 319-328."}],"container-title":["Access to Justice in Eastern Europe"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/ajee-journal.com\/upload\/attaches\/att_1647102937.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,5,16]],"date-time":"2022-05-16T10:13:13Z","timestamp":1652695993000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/ajee-journal.com\/european-small-claims-procedure-an-effective-process-a-proposal-for-an-online-platform"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,3,11]]},"references-count":17,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,3,11]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.33327\/ajee-18-5.2-a000206","archive":["Internet Archive","Internet Archive","Internet Archive"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["2663-0583","2663-0575"],"issn-type":[{"type":"electronic","value":"2663-0583"},{"type":"print","value":"2663-0575"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,3,11]]}}}