{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,10]],"date-time":"2026-06-10T13:59:07Z","timestamp":1781099947477,"version":"3.54.1"},"reference-count":49,"publisher":"Aboutscience Srl","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,10]],"date-time":"2026-06-10T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1781049600000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Arch. Physioter"],"abstract":"<jats:p>Introduction: Gender equity in scientific research, especially in Physiotherapy, reveals significant underrepresentation of women, affecting career advancement, salary, and research recognition. This study aims to examine the characteristics, knowledge, attitudes, and productivity of Physiotherapy researchers in Italy, focusing on gender distribution.Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted on Italian Physiotherapists who either have a PhD or are currently enrolled in PhD programs.We used a survey consisting of 62 items that explored demographic and educational characteristics, research experience, worklife balance, attitude and social norms, and career-related factors. Performance metrics included H-index, number of publications (during PhD and in the whole career), and awards.Results: Of the 167 Physiotherapists surveyed, 102 participated. Female participants reported worse attitudes and social norms perception, and during their PhD, were less satisfied with work conditions compared to males. Females reported a median of 3 publications during their PhD, and males 5. However, after adjusting for age, time invested in research, and whether the interviewee lives with a partner, age remains the only associated factor. There is no evidence of an association between gender and H-index or awards.Conclusion: Gender-based disparities in research attitudes exist in Physiotherapy, particularly during the PhD phase, favoring males. Further research is needed to promote gender equity.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.33393\/aop.2026.3467","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,10]],"date-time":"2026-06-10T13:09:14Z","timestamp":1781096954000},"page":"84-92","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Exploring gender differences in Physiotherapy research in Italy: a cross-sectional analysis"],"prefix":"10.33393","volume":"16","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-8972-9188","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Martina","family":"Putzolu","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-6225-2989","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Simone","family":"Gambazza","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-3345-8187","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Greta","family":"Castellini","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-1609-8060","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Andrea","family":"Turolla","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-3770-0011","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Silvia","family":"Gianola","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"18642","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,10]]},"reference":[{"key":"18590","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"1. Br\u00fcck O. A bibliometric analysis of the gender gap in the authorship of leading medical journals. Commun Med (Lond). 2023;3(1):179. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s43856-023-00417-3 PMID:38082119","DOI":"10.1038\/s43856-023-00417-3"},{"key":"18591","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"2. Hakvoort K, Conzen-Dilger C, Gutzmann A, et al. Is there a gender gap in clinical neurosciences? A cross-sectional analysis of female participation in academic neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2023;155:105458. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.neubiorev.2023.105458 PMID:37931690","DOI":"10.1016\/j.neubiorev.2023.105458"},{"key":"18592","unstructured":"3. United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization. Bello A. et al. To be smart, the digital revolution will need to be inclusive: excerpt from the UNESCO science report. UNESCO. Online https:\/\/unesdoc.unesco.org\/ark:\/48223\/pf0000375429.locale=en (Accessed January 2025)."},{"key":"18593","unstructured":"4. Societ\u00e0 Italiana di Fisioterapia. Online https:\/\/www.sif-fisioterapia.it\/ (Accessed January 2025)"},{"key":"18594","unstructured":"5. World Economic Forum. The gender gap in science and technology, in numbers. 2021. Online https:\/\/www.weforum.org\/agenda\/2021\/07\/science-technology-gender-gap\/ (Accessed January 2025)"},{"key":"18595","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"6. Chaudhary AMD, Naveed S, Safdar B, et al. Gender differences in research project grants and R01 grants at the National Institutes of Health. Cureus. 2021;13(5):e14930. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7759\/cureus.14930 PMID:34123629","DOI":"10.7759\/cureus.14930"},{"key":"18596","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"7. Misra V, Safi F, Brewerton KA, et al. Gender disparity between authors in leading medical journals during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional review. BMJ Open. 2021;11(7):e051224. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmjopen-2021-051224 PMID:34261692","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2021-051224"},{"key":"18597","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"8. Huang J, Gates AJ, Sinatra R, et al. Historical comparison of gender inequality in scientific careers across countries and disciplines. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2020;117(9):4609-4616. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1073\/pnas.1914221117 PMID:32071248","DOI":"10.1073\/pnas.1914221117"},{"key":"18598","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"9. Ross MB, Glennon BM, Murciano-Goroff R, et al. Women are credited less in science than men. Nature. 2022;608(7921):135-145. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41586-022-04966-w","DOI":"10.1038\/s41586-022-04966-w"},{"key":"18599","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"10. Avolio B, Ch\u00e1vez J, V\u00edlchez-Rom\u00e1n C. Factors that contribute to the underrepresentation of women in science careers worldwide: a literature review. Social Psychology of Education. 2020;23(3):773-794. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11218-020-09558-y","DOI":"10.1007\/s11218-020-09558-y"},{"key":"18600","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"11. Sullivan O. Gender inequality in work-family balance. Nature Human Behaviour. 2019;3(3):201-203. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41562-019-0536-3","DOI":"10.1038\/s41562-019-0536-3"},{"key":"18601","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"12. Castilla EJ, Benard S. The paradox of meritocracy in organizations. Adm Sci Q. 2010;55(4):543-576. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2189\/asqu.2010.55.4.543","DOI":"10.2189\/asqu.2010.55.4.543"},{"key":"18602","unstructured":"13. SIF. Italian Society of Physiotherapists. Dottorati di Ricerca. Online https:\/\/www.sif-fisioterapia.it\/fisioterapisti-e-dottorati-di-ricerca\/ (Accessed January 2025)"},{"key":"18603","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"14. Bennett C, Khangura S, Brehaut JC, et al. Reporting guidelines for survey research: an analysis of published guidance and reporting practices. PLoS Med. 2010;8(8):e1001069. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pmed.1001069 PMID:21829330","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1001069"},{"key":"18604","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"15. Eysenbach G. Improving the quality of Web surveys: the Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES). J Med Internet Res. 2004;6(3):e34. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2196\/jmir.6.3.e34 PMID:15471760","DOI":"10.2196\/jmir.6.3.e34"},{"key":"18605","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"16. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, et al; STROBE Initiative. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. PLoS Med. 2007;4(10):e296. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pmed.0040296 PMID:17941714","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.0040296"},{"key":"18606","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"17. Collins GS, Reitsma JB, Altman DG, et al. Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement. BMJ. 2015;350(jan07 4):g7594. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmj.g7594 PMID:25569120","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.g7594"},{"key":"18607","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"18. Heidari S, Babor TF, De Castro P, et al. Sex and gender equity in research: rationale for the SAGER guidelines and recommended use. Research Integrity and Peer Review. 2016;1(1):2. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s41073-016-0007-6","DOI":"10.1186\/s41073-016-0007-6"},{"key":"18608","unstructured":"19. SurveyMonkey Inc. Location: San Mateo, California, USA Main www.surveymonkey.com (Accessed January 2025)"},{"key":"18609","unstructured":"20. European Commission. She figures 2021. Online https:\/\/research-and-innovation.ec.europa.eu\/knowledge-publications-tools-and-data\/publications\/all-publications\/she-figures-2021_en (Accessed January 2025)"},{"key":"18610","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"21. Corvino C, De Leo A, Parise M, et al. Organizational well-being of Italian doctoral students: is academia sustainable when it comes to gender equality? Sustainability. 2022; 14(11):6425. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/su14116425","DOI":"10.3390\/su14116425"},{"key":"18611","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"22. Abramo G, Aksnes DW, D\u2019Angelo CA. Gender differences in research performance within and between countries: Italy vs Norway. Journal of Informetrics. 2021;15(2):101144. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.joi.2021.101144","DOI":"10.1016\/j.joi.2021.101144"},{"key":"18612","unstructured":"23. Survey Monkey. Sample size calculator. Online https:\/\/it.surveymonkey.com\/mp\/sample-size-calculator\/ (Accessed January 2025)"},{"key":"18613","unstructured":"24. Scopus. Online https:\/\/www.scopus.com\/freelookup\/form\/author.uri. (Accessed January 2025)"},{"key":"18614","unstructured":"25. StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software: Release 18. StataCorp LLC; 2023."},{"key":"18615","unstructured":"26. European Commission. Ethics data protection. 2018. Online https:\/\/ec.europa.eu\/research\/participants\/data\/ref\/h2020\/grants_manual\/hi\/ethics\/h2020_hi_ethics-data-protection_en.pdf (Accessed January 2025)"},{"key":"18616","unstructured":"27. World Economic Forum. The global gender gap report. 2020. Online https:\/\/www.weforum.org\/publications\/gender-gap-2020-report-100-years-pay-equality\/ (Accessed January 2025)"},{"key":"18617","unstructured":"28. Statistics Norway. Kindergartens. 2020. Online https:\/\/www.ssb.no\/en\/barnehager\/ (Accessed January 2025)"},{"key":"18618","unstructured":"29. Istat. Asili nido e altri servizi socio-educativi per l\u2019infanzia. 2019. Online https:\/\/www.istat.it\/it\/files\/2019\/03\/asili-nido.pdf (Accessed January 2025)"},{"key":"18619","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"30. Stewart R, Wright B, Smith L, et al. Gendered stereotypes and norms: a systematic review of interventions designed to shift attitudes and behaviour. Heliyon. 2021;7(4):e06660. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.heliyon.2021.e06660 PMID:33912699","DOI":"10.1016\/j.heliyon.2021.e06660"},{"key":"18620","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"31. Llorens A, Tzovara A, Bellier L, et al. Gender bias in academia: a lifetime problem that needs solutions. Neuron. 2021;109(13):2047-2074. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.neuron.2021.06.002 PMID:34237278","DOI":"10.1016\/j.neuron.2021.06.002"},{"key":"18621","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"32. Lindsey LL. Gender Roles: A Sociological Perspective. 6th ed. Routledge; 2015, https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4324\/9781315664095.","DOI":"10.4324\/9781315664095"},{"key":"18622","unstructured":"33. Rudman LA, Glick P. The social psychology of gender: How power and intimacy shape gender relations. New York, NY, US: The Guilford Press; 2008. xiii, 386-xiii. Online https:\/\/psycnet.apa.org\/record\/2008-09331-000 (Accessed January 2025)"},{"key":"18623","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"34. Schmaling KB, Gallo SA. Gender differences in peer reviewed grant applications, awards, and amounts: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Res Integr Peer Rev. 2023;8(1):2. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s41073-023-00127-3 PMID:37131184","DOI":"10.1186\/s41073-023-00127-3"},{"key":"18624","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"35. Ha GL, Lehrer EJ, Wang M, et al. Sex differences in academic productivity across academic ranks and specialties in academic medicine: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(6):e2112404. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jamanetworkopen.2021.12404 PMID:34185071","DOI":"10.1001\/jamanetworkopen.2021.12404"},{"key":"18625","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"36. Michael DS. The gender gap amongst doctoral students in the biomedical sciences. bioRxiv. 2022. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1101\/2022.10.18.512765","DOI":"10.1101\/2022.10.18.512765"},{"key":"18626","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"37. Mayer EN, Lenherr SM, Hanson HA, et al. Gender differences in publication productivity among academic urologists in the United States. Urology. 2017;103:39-46. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.urology.2016.12.064 PMID:28232174","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2016.12.064"},{"key":"18627","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"38. Holliday EB, Jagsi R, Wilson LD, et al. Gender differences in publication productivity, academic position, career duration, and funding among U.S. academic radiation oncology faculty. Acad Med. 2014;89(5):767-773. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/ACM.0000000000000229 PMID:24667510","DOI":"10.1097\/ACM.0000000000000229"},{"key":"18628","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"39. Purdy ME, Zmuda BN, Owens AM, et al. Gender differences in publication in emergency medicine journals. Am J Emerg Med. 2021;49:338-342. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajem.2021.06.039 PMID:34229241","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajem.2021.06.039"},{"key":"18629","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"40. Weaver P, Sherman K, Smith KE, et al. Publication rate and impact stratified by gender among pharmacists designated Fellow in the American College of Critical Care Medicine. J Am Pharm Assoc. 2023;63(1):178-181. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.japh.2022.08.018","DOI":"10.1016\/j.japh.2022.08.018"},{"key":"18630","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"41. Bendels MHK, M\u00fcller R, Brueggmann D, et al. Gender disparities in high-quality research revealed by Nature Index journals. PLoS One. 2018;13(1):e0189136. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0189136 PMID:29293499","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0189136"},{"key":"18631","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"42. Brizuela V, Chebet JJ, Thorson A. Supporting early-career women researchers: lessons from a global mentorship programme. Glob Health Action. 2023;16(1):2162228. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/16549716.2022.2162228 PMID:36705071","DOI":"10.1080\/16549716.2022.2162228"},{"key":"18632","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"43. Farina S, Iafrate R, Boccia S. Unveiling the gender gap: exploring gender disparities in European academic landscape. Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2023;34:100752. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.lanepe.2023.100752 PMID:37868695","DOI":"10.1016\/j.lanepe.2023.100752"},{"key":"18633","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"44. S\u00e1 C, Cowley S, Martinez M, et al. Gender gaps in research productivity and recognition among elite scientists in the U.S., Canada, and South Africa. PLoS One. 2020;15(10):e0240903. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0240903 PMID:33119671","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0240903"},{"key":"18634","unstructured":"45. FNOFI. Identikit dei fisioterapisti italiani: ecco i numeri della professione. Online https:\/\/www.fnofi.it\/blog\/identikit-dei-fisioterapisti-italiani-ecco-i-numeri-della-professione\/ (Accessed January 2025)"},{"key":"18635","unstructured":"46. Decreto Ministeriale 8 gennaio 2009. Determinazione delle classi delle lauree magistrali delle professioni sanitarie, ai sensi del decreto ministeriale 22 ottobre 2004, n. 270. Gazzetta Ufficiale della Repubblica Italiana, Serie Generale n. 122, 28 maggio 2009. Online https:\/\/www.gazzettaufficiale.it\/eli\/id\/2009\/05\/28\/09A05989\/sg (Accessed January 2025)"},{"key":"18636","unstructured":"47. Decreto Ministeriale 2 aprile 2001. Determinazione delle classi delle lauree specialistiche universitarie delle professioni sanitarie. Gazzetta Ufficiale della Repubblica Italiana, 6 maggio 2001, n. 128, Supplemento Ordinario n. 136. Online https:\/\/www.gazzettaufficiale.it\/eli\/gu\/2001\/06\/05\/128\/so\/136\/sg\/pdf (Accessed January 2025)"},{"key":"18637","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"48. Edwards PJ, Roberts I, Clarke MJ, et al. Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023;11(11):MR000008. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/14651858.MR000008.pub5 PMID:38032037","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.MR000008.pub5"},{"key":"18638","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"49. Althubaiti A. Information bias in health research: definition, pitfalls, and adjustment methods. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2016;9:211-217. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2147\/JMDH.S104807 PMID:27217764","DOI":"10.2147\/JMDH.S104807"}],"container-title":["Archives of Physiotherapy"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.archivesofphysiotherapy.com\/index.php\/aop\/article\/download\/3467\/4107","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.archivesofphysiotherapy.com\/index.php\/aop\/article\/download\/3467\/4106","content-type":"application\/epub+zip","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.archivesofphysiotherapy.com\/index.php\/aop\/article\/download\/3467\/4107","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,10]],"date-time":"2026-06-10T13:09:43Z","timestamp":1781096983000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.archivesofphysiotherapy.com\/index.php\/aop\/article\/view\/3467"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,10]]},"references-count":49,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,30]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.33393\/aop.2026.3467","relation":{},"ISSN":["2057-0082","2057-0082"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2057-0082","type":"electronic"},{"value":"2057-0082","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,10]]}}}