{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,30]],"date-time":"2026-06-30T13:01:04Z","timestamp":1782824464465,"version":"3.54.5"},"reference-count":8,"publisher":"Institute of Physiology of the Czech Academy of Sciences","issue":"S3","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Physiol Res"],"abstract":"<jats:p>A case of double trisomy 16 and 22 in the second pregnancy loss is presented. DNA analyses (short tandem repeats genotyping) of miscarriage specimen was indicated because of ultrasound suspicion of partial hydatidiform mole. After the partial hydatidiform mole exclusion, further DNA analyses focused on the most common aneuploidies causing pregnancy loss, detected double trisomy 16 and 22 in the product of conception. The couple was referred to clinical genetic consultation and normal parental karyotypes were proved. For further explanatory purposes, archived material from the first pregnancy loss was analyzed and trisomy of chromosome 18 was detected. By comparison of allelic profiles of the mother, father, and both losses, the maternal origin of all aneuploidies was proven what can be attributed to frequent meiosis errors, probably due to advanced maternal age (44 years at the first loss and 45 years at the second loss). In conclusion, aneuploidies can mimic partial hydatidiform mole. Genetic analysis is helpful on the one hand to rule out partial hydatidiform mole and on the other hand to identify aneuploidies and in this way to determine the cause of miscarriage.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.33549\/physiolres.935174","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,25]],"date-time":"2023-10-25T18:06:11Z","timestamp":1698257171000},"page":"S309-S313","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":4,"title":["Double Trisomy 16 and 22 Clinically Mimic Partial Hydatidiform Mole in a Case of Subsequent Pregnancy Loss"],"prefix":"10.33549","volume":"72","author":[{"given":"L","family":"Gergely","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Institute of Medical Biology, Genetics and Clinical Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University Bratislava, Bratislava, Slovak Republic"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"M","family":"Korbe\u013e","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"A","family":"Adamec","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"V","family":"Repisk\u00e1","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"P","family":"Bab\u00e1l","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"K","family":"Meli\u0161ov\u00e1","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"P","family":"Pri\u0161\u010d\u00e1kov\u00e1","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"19169","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref0","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Malova J, Bohmer D, Luha J, Pastorakova A, Cierna Z, Braxatorisova T. Single umbilical artery and reproduction losses in Slovak population: relation to karyotype and fetal anomalies. Bratisl Lek Listy 2018; 19:330-334. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4149\/BLL_2018_062","DOI":"10.4149\/bll_2018_062"},{"key":"ref1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Diego-Alvarez D, Ramos-Corrales C, Garcia-Hoyos M, Bustamante-Aragones A, Cantalapiedra D, Diaz-Recasens J, Vallespin-Garcia E, Ayuso C, Lorda-Sanchez I. Double trisomy in spontaneous miscarriages: cytogenetic and molecular approach. Hum Reprod 2006;21:958-966. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/humrep\/dei406","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dei406"},{"key":"ref2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Subramaniyam S, Pulijaal VR, Mathew S. Double and multiple chromosomal aneuploidies in spontaneous abortions: A single institutional experience. J Hum Reprod Sci 2014;7:262-268. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4103\/0974-1208.147494","DOI":"10.4103\/0974-1208.147494"},{"key":"ref3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Gergely L, Petrovic R, Feketova Z, Klimova D, Danihel L, Mosna K, Mrazova H, Korbel M, Repiska V, Priscakova P. Partial hydatidiform moles with unclear histopathological profile - importance of genetic diagnostics. Ceska Gynekol 2021;86:381-386. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48095\/cccg2021381","DOI":"10.48095\/cccg2021381"},{"key":"ref4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Papas RS, Kutteh WH. A new algorithm for the evaluation of recurrent pregnancy loss redefining unexplained miscarriage: review of current guidelines. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2020;32:371-379. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/GCO.0000000000000647","DOI":"10.1097\/gco.0000000000000647"},{"key":"ref5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"McClelland LS, Allen SK, Larkins SA, Hamilton SJ, Marton T, Cox PM, Hargitai B, Johnston EH, Morgan C, Hardy G. Implementation and experience of an alternative QF-PCR and MLPA diagnostic strategy to detect chromosomal abnormalities in fetal and neonatal pathology samples. Pediatr Dev Pathol 2011;14:460-468. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2350\/11-01-0971-OA.1","DOI":"10.2350\/11-01-0971-oa.1"},{"key":"ref6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Zou G, Zhang J, Li XW, He L, He G, Duan T. Quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction to detect chromosomal anomalies in spontaneous abortion. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2008;103:237-240. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ijgo.2008.07.014","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2008.07.014"},{"key":"ref7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Russo R, Sessa AM, Fumo R, Gaeta S. Chromosomal anomalies in early spontaneous abortions: interphase FISH analysis on 855 FFPE first trimester abortions. Prenat Diagn 2016;36:186-191. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/pd.4768","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.4768"}],"container-title":["Physiological Research"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,25]],"date-time":"2023-10-25T18:06:15Z","timestamp":1698257175000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.biomed.cas.cz\/physiolres\/pdf\/2023\/72_S309.pdf"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023]]},"references-count":8,"journal-issue":{"issue":"S3","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,23]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.33549\/physiolres.935174","relation":{},"ISSN":["1802-9973","0862-8408"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1802-9973","type":"electronic"},{"value":"0862-8408","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2023]]}}}