{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,21]],"date-time":"2026-07-21T15:10:38Z","timestamp":1784646638500,"version":"3.55.0"},"reference-count":66,"publisher":"Frontiers Media SA","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,4,12]],"date-time":"2024-04-12T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1712880000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["frontiersin.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Front. Blockchain"],"abstract":"<jats:p>This paper explores the evidentiary significance of blockchain records and the procedural implications of integrating this technology into the U.S. judicial system, as several states have undertaken legislative measures to facilitate the admissibility of blockchain evidence. We employ a comprehensive methodological approach, including legislative analysis, comparative case law analysis, technical examination of blockchain mechanics, and stakeholder engagement. Our study suggests that blockchain evidence may be categorized as hearsay exceptions or non-hearsay, depending on the specific characteristics of the records. The paper proposes a specialized consensus mechanism for standardizing blockchain evidence authentication and outlines strategies to enhance the technology\u2019s trustworthiness. It also highlights the importance of expert testimony in clarifying blockchain\u2019s technical aspects for legal contexts. This study contributes to understanding blockchain\u2019s integration into judicial systems, emphasizing the need for a comprehensive approach to its admissibility and reliability as evidence. It bridges the gap between technology and law, offering a blueprint for standardizing legal approaches to blockchain and urging ethical and transparent technology use.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.3389\/fbloc.2024.1306058","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,4,12]],"date-time":"2024-04-12T04:30:00Z","timestamp":1712896200000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/crossmark-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":21,"title":["Blockchain in the courtroom: exploring its evidentiary significance and procedural implications in U.S. judicial processes"],"prefix":"10.3389","volume":"7","author":[{"given":"Xukang","family":"Wang","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ying Cheng","family":"Wu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Zhe","family":"Ma","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1965","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,4,12]]},"reference":[{"key":"B1","volume-title":"Mastering Bitcoin: programming the open blockchain","author":"Antonopoulos","year":"2017"},{"key":"B2","unstructured":"Arizona house bill 24172017"},{"key":"B3","unstructured":"IPFS - content addressed, versioned, P2P file system\n            BenetJ.\n          2014"},{"key":"B4","volume-title":"Introduction to the law and legal system of the United States","author":"Burnham","year":"2016"},{"key":"B5","unstructured":"On public and private blockchains\n            ButerinV.\n          2015"},{"key":"B6","unstructured":"Is blockchain evidence inadmissible hearsay?\n            ChingJ.\n          2016"},{"key":"B7","volume-title":"The social control of technology","author":"Collingridge","year":"1980"},{"key":"B8","volume-title":"Evaluation of evidence: pre-modern and modern approaches","author":"Damaska","year":"2019"},{"key":"B9","unstructured":"Delaware general corporation law, section 2242017"},{"key":"B10","first-page":"255","article-title":"On search friction of route discovery in offchain networks","author":"Farzaneh","year":"2020"},{"key":"B11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2139\/ssrn.3488542","article-title":"A primer on blockchain, smart contracts & crypto-assets from a legal perspective","author":"Fenwick","year":"2019","journal-title":"SSRN Electron. J."},{"key":"B12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"805","DOI":"10.15779\/Z38BG31","article-title":"The Internet of things and the fourth amendment of effects","volume":"104","author":"Ferguson","year":"2016","journal-title":"Calif. Law Rev."},{"key":"B13","volume-title":"Comparative legal traditions in a nutshell","author":"Glendon","year":"2016"},{"key":"B14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1367","DOI":"10.1093\/jiplp\/jpab102","article-title":"The treachery of images: non-fungible tokens and copyright","volume":"16","author":"Guadamuz-Gonzalez","year":"2021","journal-title":"J. Intellect. Prop. Law Pract."},{"key":"B15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2139\/ssrn.3040224","article-title":"2017 global blockchain benchmarking study","author":"Hileman","year":"2017","journal-title":"SSRN Electron. J."},{"key":"B16","unstructured":"Introduction \u2014 hyperledger-fabricdocs master documentation\n            HyperledgerH.\n          2023"},{"key":"B17","unstructured":"Illinois blockchain technology act2020"},{"key":"B18","first-page":"519","article-title":"Blockchain jenga: the challenges of blockchain discovery and admissibility under the federal rules","volume":"48","author":"Knight","year":"2019","journal-title":"Hofstra Law Rev."},{"key":"B19","first-page":"839","article-title":"Hawk: the blockchain model of cryptography and privacy-preserving smart contracts","author":"Kosba","year":"2016"},{"key":"B20","article-title":"Big data analytics, rising crime, and forth amendment protections","volume":"259","author":"Kraft","year":"2017","journal-title":"J. Law, Technol. Policy"},{"key":"B21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"11","DOI":"10.1109\/MITP.2018.021921645","article-title":"Blockchain in developing countries","volume":"20","author":"Kshetri","year":"2018","journal-title":"IT Prof."},{"key":"B22","first-page":"568","article-title":"Traceability of counterfeit medicine supply chain through Blockchain","author":"Kumar","year":"2019"},{"key":"B23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2139\/ssrn.3905452","article-title":"Non-fungible tokens and copyright law","author":"Lee","year":"2021","journal-title":"SSRN Electron. J."},{"key":"B24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"110","DOI":"10.1108\/RMJ-12-2015-0042","article-title":"Trusting records: is Blockchain technology the answer?","volume":"26","author":"Lemieux","year":"2016","journal-title":"Rec. Manag. J."},{"key":"B25","unstructured":"An introduction to smart contracts and their potential and inherent limitations\n            LeviS. D.\n            LiptonA. B.\n          2018"},{"key":"B26","unstructured":"Federal rules of evidence, rules 401, 403, 9012022"},{"key":"B27","unstructured":"Blockchain and the GDPR\n            LyonsT.\n            CourcelasL.\n            TimsitK.\n          2018"},{"key":"B29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"313","DOI":"10.2139\/ssrn.3103612","article-title":"Smart contracts, blockchain, and the next frontier of transactional law","volume":"13","author":"McKinney","year":"2018","journal-title":"Wash. J. Law, Technol. Arts"},{"key":"B30","volume-title":"The civil law tradition: an introduction to the legal systems of europe and Latin America","author":"Merryman","year":"2019"},{"key":"B31","unstructured":"Atomism, holism, and the judicial assessment of evidence\n            MnookinJ. L.\n          2013"},{"key":"B32","unstructured":"Bitcoin: a peer-to-peer electronic cash system\n            NakamotoS.\n          2008"},{"key":"B33","volume-title":"Bitcoin and cryptocurrency technologies: a comprehensive introduction","author":"Narayanan","year":"2016"},{"key":"B34","volume-title":"Blockchain4EU: blockchain for industrial transformations","author":"Nascimento","year":"2018"},{"key":"B35","unstructured":"Deconstructing blockchains: a comprehensive survey on consensus, membership and structure\n            NatoliC.\n            YuJ.\n            GramoliV.\n            Esteves-VerissimoP.\n          2019"},{"key":"B36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2139\/ssrn.4066534","article-title":"Blockchain evidence: hearsay, authentication, and the best evidence rule","author":"Pappas","year":"2022","journal-title":"SSRN Electron. J."},{"key":"B37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"96","DOI":"10.2139\/ssrn.3418485","article-title":"Blockchain evidence in court proceedings in China--A comparative study of admissible evidence in the digital age (as of June 4, 2019)","volume":"3","author":"Polydor","year":"2020","journal-title":"Stanf. J. Blockchain Law Policy"},{"key":"B38","unstructured":"The law and legality of smart contracts\n            RaskinM.\n          2017"},{"key":"B39","first-page":"20","article-title":"Blockchain and GDPR: application scenarios and compliance requirements","author":"Regner","year":"2018"},{"key":"B40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"4","DOI":"10.1007\/s40319-018-00777-7","article-title":"The data sharing economy: on the emergence of new intermediaries","volume":"50","author":"Richter","year":"2018","journal-title":"IIC - Int. Rev. Intellect. Prop. Compet. Law"},{"key":"B41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3389\/fbloc.2020.00036","article-title":"What happens in blockchain stays in blockchain. A legal solution to conflicts between digital ledgers and privacy rights","volume":"3","author":"Riva","year":"2020","journal-title":"Front. Blockchain"},{"key":"B42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"116","DOI":"10.1080\/13600834.2017.1301036","article-title":"Contract law 2.0: \u00abSmart\u00bb contracts as the beginning of the end of classic contract law","volume":"26","author":"Savelyev","year":"2017","journal-title":"Inf. Commun. Technol. Law"},{"key":"B43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"550","DOI":"10.1016\/j.clsr.2017.11.008","article-title":"Copyright in the blockchain era: promises and challenges","volume":"34","author":"Savelyev","year":"2018","journal-title":"Comput. Law Secur. Rev."},{"key":"B44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"4067","DOI":"10.3390\/su14074067","article-title":"Blockchain for public sector services: cases from the UAE and Estonia","volume":"14","author":"Shafeeq","year":"2022","journal-title":"Sustainability"},{"key":"B45","first-page":"589","article-title":"Evaluating time varying connectivities and system throughput in opportunistic networks for smart grid applications","author":"Singh","year":"2019"},{"key":"B46","first-page":"263","article-title":"Smart contracts and the cost of inflexibility","volume":"166","author":"Sklaroff","year":"2017","journal-title":"Univ. Pa. Law Rev."},{"key":"B47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2139\/ssrn.4033172","article-title":"Blockchain and the law of evidence: authentication of blockchain-based legal records","author":"Snider","year":"2022","journal-title":"SSRN Electron. J."},{"key":"B48","unstructured":"In re Winship, 397 U.S. 358, in re Winship1970"},{"key":"B49","unstructured":"Victor v. Nebraska, 511 U.S. 11994"},{"key":"B50","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"91","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-018-9233-1","article-title":"Assessment criteria or standards of proof? An effort in clarification","volume":"28","author":"Tuzet","year":"2020","journal-title":"Artif. Intell. Law"},{"key":"B51","unstructured":"United States v. Lamons, 532 F.3d 1251 (11th Cir. 2008)2008"},{"key":"B52","unstructured":"United States v. Lizarraga-Tirado, 789 F.3d 1107 (9th Cir. 2015)2015"},{"key":"B53","unstructured":"United States v. Costanzo, 956 F.3d 1088 (9th Cir. 2020)2020"},{"key":"B54","article-title":"Lorraine v. Markel American insurance Co., 241 F.R.D. 534 (D. Md. 2007)","year":"2007"},{"key":"B55","unstructured":"Federal rules of evidence, 28 U.S.C2022"},{"key":"B56","unstructured":"Vermont blockchain enabling act, H.8682016"},{"key":"B57","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"43920","DOI":"10.1109\/ACCESS.2021.3066787","article-title":"Consensus mechanism and algorithm based on blockchain technology: a survey","volume":"9","author":"Wang","year":"2021","journal-title":"IEEE Access"},{"key":"B58","article-title":"Privacy by BlockChain design: a blockchain-enabled GDPR-compliant approach for handling personal data","author":"Wirth","year":"2018"},{"key":"B59","first-page":"333","article-title":"Blockchain and alternative dispute resolution: opportunities and challenges","volume-title":"Handbook of blockchain law: a guide to understanding and resolving the legal challenges of blockchain technology","author":"Wong","year":"2021"},{"key":"B60","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2139\/ssrn.2580664","article-title":"Decentralized blockchain technology and the rise of lex cryptographia","author":"Wright","year":"2015","journal-title":"SSRN Electron. J."},{"key":"B61","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"105401","DOI":"10.1016\/j.clsr.2020.105401","article-title":"Electronic evidence in the blockchain era: new rules on authenticity and integrity","volume":"36","author":"Wu","year":"2020","journal-title":"Comput. Law Secur. Rev."},{"key":"B62","first-page":"45","article-title":"Do you need a blockchain?","author":"W\u00fcst","year":"2018"},{"key":"B63","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"25","DOI":"10.1186\/s40854-016-0046-5","article-title":"Are blockchains immune to all malicious attacks?","volume":"2","author":"Xu","year":"2016","journal-title":"Financ. Innov."},{"key":"B64","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.6028\/NIST.IR.8202","volume-title":"Blockchain technology overview","author":"Yaga","year":"2018"},{"key":"B65","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"470","DOI":"10.1093\/jiplp\/jpw049","article-title":"A legal framework for a data economy in the European digital single market rights to use data","volume":"460","author":"Zech","year":"2016","journal-title":"11 J. Intellect. Prop. Law Pract."},{"key":"B66","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2139\/ssrn.3447404","article-title":"The application of blockchain technology in the field of evidence: a comparative study of China, us, and europe","author":"Zou","year":"2019","journal-title":"SSRN Electron. J."},{"key":"B67","volume-title":"An introduction to comparative law","author":"Zweigert","year":"1998"}],"container-title":["Frontiers in Blockchain"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.frontiersin.org\/articles\/10.3389\/fbloc.2024.1306058\/full","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,4,12]],"date-time":"2024-04-12T04:30:13Z","timestamp":1712896213000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.frontiersin.org\/articles\/10.3389\/fbloc.2024.1306058\/full"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,4,12]]},"references-count":66,"alternative-id":["10.3389\/fbloc.2024.1306058"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fbloc.2024.1306058","relation":{},"ISSN":["2624-7852"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2624-7852","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,4,12]]},"article-number":"1306058"}}