{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,30]],"date-time":"2025-07-30T15:48:54Z","timestamp":1753890534548,"version":"3.41.2"},"reference-count":36,"publisher":"Frontiers Media SA","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,9]],"date-time":"2024-12-09T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1733702400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100005416","name":"Norwegian Research Council","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["315404"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["315404"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100005416","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["frontiersin.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Front. Digit. Health"],"abstract":"<jats:sec><jats:title>Background<\/jats:title><jats:p>In recent years, text-based e-consultations have been widely implemented in general practice and are appreciated by patients for their convenience and efficiency. Policymakers aim to enhance patient access to clinical services with the general practitioner (GP) through text-based e-consultations. However, concerns are raised about their efficiency and security. We aimed to investigate users\u2019 perceptions of potential improvements in the text-based e-consultation service provided by the national health portal in Norway.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Method<\/jats:title><jats:p>We conducted an online survey among users of text-based e-consultations with the GP on the national health portal Helsenorge. The survey was available from January-February 2023 and consisted of 20 questions. This study focused on the free-text answers to the question \u201c<jats:italic>Do you have any suggestions to improve the service?\u201d<\/jats:italic> The framework method was used for a thematic analysis of the answers.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results<\/jats:title><jats:p>The analysis of 2,954 free-text answers from users of the national e-consultation service resulted in six areas where suggestions for improvement were expressed. According to users, the service would benefit from: (1) a better set-up to facilitate the formulation of the patient's problem, (2) better value for money (in regards to both price and quality), (3) faster response time, (4) improved information and predictability about the status of the e-consultation (e.g., if it is received and when to expect an answer), (5) improvement in technical issues, and (6) improvement of access to dialogue-based services to replace or complement e-consultations.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title><jats:p>The analysis of users\u2019 suggestions for improvements to the e-consultation service emphasised the need to customise the service to address individual patient needs. Users found a one-size-fits-all approach with mandatory questions, fixed pricing, and inflexible response times less appreciated. Some also felt forced to rely on e-consultations due to the perceived poor availability of other GP services. This highlights the importance of perceiving e-consultations not as a replacement for dialogue-enabled services, but rather as a potentially efficient addition, ensuring a well-tailored setup for appropriate patient use.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.3389\/fdgth.2024.1459684","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,9]],"date-time":"2024-12-09T06:29:33Z","timestamp":1733725773000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/crossmark-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"title":["Patients\u2019 suggestions for improvements to text-based e-consultations. An online survey of users of the national health portal in Norway"],"prefix":"10.3389","volume":"6","author":[{"given":"Eli","family":"Kristiansen","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Helen","family":"Atherton","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Trine Strand","family":"Bergmo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Paolo","family":"Zanaboni","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"1965","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,9]]},"reference":[{"key":"B1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"6854","DOI":"10.3390\/ijerph20196854","article-title":"Digital health interventions to improve access to and quality of primary health care services: a scoping review","volume":"20","author":"Erku","year":"2023","journal-title":"Int J Environ Res Public Health"},{"key":"B2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e35380","DOI":"10.2196\/35380","article-title":"Digital health opportunities to improve primary health care in the context of COVID-19: scoping review","volume":"9","author":"Silva","year":"2022","journal-title":"JMIR Hum Factors"},{"key":"B3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e034773","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2019-034773","article-title":"Patients\u2019 use and experiences with e-consultation and other digital health services with their general practitioner in Norway: results from an online survey","volume":"10","author":"Zanaboni","year":"2020","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"year":"","key":"B4","article-title":"Statistikk om allmenlegetjenester"},{"key":"B5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"33","DOI":"10.1080\/02813432.2022.2161307","article-title":"Older patients\u2019 experiences of access to and use of e-consultations with the general practitioner in Norway: an interview study","volume":"41","author":"Kristiansen","year":"2023","journal-title":"Scand J Prim Health Care"},{"key":"B6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e13042","DOI":"10.2196\/13042","article-title":"Electronic consultation in primary care between providers and patients: systematic review","volume":"7","author":"Mold","year":"2019","journal-title":"JMIR Med Inform"},{"key":"B7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"498","DOI":"10.1080\/02813432.2022.2159200","article-title":"Digital consultation in primary healthcare: the effects on access, efficiency and patient safety based on provider experience; a qualitative study","volume":"40","author":"Eriksson","year":"2022","journal-title":"Scand J Prim Health Care"},{"key":"B8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"BJGPO.2023.0177","DOI":"10.3399\/BJGPO.2023.0177","article-title":"Effectiveness and safety of asynchronous telemedicine consultations in general practice: a systematic review","volume":"8","author":"Leighton","year":"2024","journal-title":"BJGP open"},{"key":"B9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e058247","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2021-058247","article-title":"Use and usability of GP online services: a mixed-methods sequential study, before and during the COVID-19 pandemic, based on qualitative interviews, analysis of routine eConsult usage and feedback data, and assessment of GP websites in Devon and Cornwall, England","volume":"12","author":"Jones","year":"2022","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"key":"B10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e293","DOI":"10.3399\/bjgp18X694853","article-title":"Alternatives to the face-to-face consultation in general practice: focused ethnographic case study","volume":"68","author":"Atherton","year":"2018","journal-title":"Br J Gen Pract"},{"key":"B11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e018688","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2017-018688","article-title":"Feasibility, acceptability and effectiveness of an online alternative to face-to-face consultation in general practice: a mixed-methods study of webGP in six Devon practices","volume":"8","author":"Carter","year":"2018","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"key":"B12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e019966","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2017-019966","article-title":"Implementing online consultations in primary care: a mixed-method evaluation extending normalisation process theory through service co-production","volume":"8","author":"Farr","year":"2018","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"key":"B13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e18203","DOI":"10.2196\/18203","article-title":"The impact of digital-first consultations on workload in general practice: modeling study","volume":"22","author":"Salisbury","year":"2020","journal-title":"JMIR"},{"key":"B14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e336","DOI":"10.3399\/bjgp19X702197","article-title":"Patient use of an online triage platform: a mixed-methods retrospective exploration in UK primary care","volume":"69","author":"Eccles","year":"2019","journal-title":"Br J Gen Pract"},{"key":"B15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e016901","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2017-016901","article-title":"Use of a primary care online consultation system, by whom, when and why: evaluation of a pilot observational study in 36 general practices in south west England","volume":"7","author":"Edwards","year":"2017","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"key":"B16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e019233","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2017-019233","article-title":"Understanding the use of email consultation in primary care using a retrospective observational study with data of Dutch electronic health records","volume":"8","author":"Huygens","year":"2018","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"key":"B17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"68","DOI":"10.1186\/s12875-019-0952-5","article-title":"Increasing workload in Norwegian general practice \u2013 a qualitative study","volume":"20","author":"Svedahl","year":"2019","journal-title":"BMC Fam Pract"},{"year":"2020","key":"B18","article-title":"Ministry of Health and Care Services. [Action plan for the general practitioner services 2020-2024]"},{"year":"2024","key":"B19","article-title":"The Norwegian Medical Association. [List of reimbursement codes for general practitioner and out-of-hours primary healthcare]"},{"year":"","key":"B20","article-title":"Helsenorge"},{"year":"","key":"B21","article-title":"Norsk helsenett. Kom i gang med digital dialog for fastlege"},{"key":"B22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"843","DOI":"10.1007\/978-981-10-5251-4_103","article-title":"Thematic analysis","volume-title":"Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences","author":"Braun","year":"2019"},{"key":"B23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"117","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2288-13-117","article-title":"Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research","volume":"13","author":"Gale","year":"2013","journal-title":"BMC Med Res Methodol"},{"article-title":"The impact of remote consultations on personalised care. Evidence briefing. Commissioned by the Personalised Care Institute","year":"2021","author":"Mann","key":"B24"},{"year":"","key":"B25","article-title":"From value for money to value-based health services: a twenty-first century shift. WHO Policy brief"},{"key":"B26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e037064","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2020-037064","article-title":"Uptake and patient and provider communication modality preferences of virtual visits in primary care: a retrospective cohort study in Canada","volume":"10","author":"Stamenova","year":"2020","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"key":"B27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e039442","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2020-039442","article-title":"How do patients and general practitioners in Denmark perceive the communicative advantages and disadvantages of access via email consultations? A media-theoretical qualitative study","volume":"10","author":"Gr\u00f8nning","year":"2020","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"key":"B28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e1","DOI":"10.3399\/bjgp17X693509","article-title":"Use of an electronic consultation system in primary care: a qualitative interview study","volume":"68","author":"Banks","year":"2018","journal-title":"Br J Gen Pract"},{"key":"B29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"65","DOI":"10.1186\/1472-6963-10-65","article-title":"The breadth of primary care: a systematic literature review of its core dimensions","volume":"10","author":"Kringos","year":"2010","journal-title":"BMC Health Serv Res"},{"key":"B30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e072944","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2023-072944","article-title":"How is primary care access changing? A retrospective, repeated cross-sectional study of patient-initiated demand at general practices in England using a modern access model, 2019\u20132022","volume":"13","author":"Chappell","year":"2023","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"key":"B31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e489","DOI":"10.3399\/BJGP.2023.0076","article-title":"Patient experiences of an online consultation system: a qualitative study in English primary care post-COVID-19","volume":"74","author":"Moschogianis","year":"2024","journal-title":"Br J Gen Pract"},{"key":"B32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e37436","DOI":"10.2196\/37436","article-title":"Understanding how the design and implementation of online consultations affect primary care quality: systematic review of evidence with recommendations for designers, providers, and researchers","volume":"24","author":"Darley","year":"2022","journal-title":"JMIR"},{"key":"B33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e128","DOI":"10.3399\/bjgp.2021.0426","article-title":"Unintended consequences of online consultations: a qualitative study in UK primary care","volume":"72","author":"Turner","year":"2022","journal-title":"Br J Gen Pract"},{"key":"B34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"BJGPO.2020.0179","DOI":"10.3399\/BJGPO.2020.0179","article-title":"Online and telephone access to general practice: a cross-sectional patient survey","volume":"5","author":"Bryce","year":"2021","journal-title":"BJGP Open"},{"key":"B35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e96","DOI":"10.3399\/BJGP.2023.0092","article-title":"Satisfaction with remote consultations in primary care during COVID-19: a population survey of UK adults","volume":"74","author":"Lifford","year":"2024","journal-title":"Br J Gen Pract"},{"key":"B36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"204","DOI":"10.1080\/02813432.2021.1913904","article-title":"Telemedicine consultations with physicians in Swedish primary care: a mixed methods study of users\u2019 experiences and care patterns","volume":"39","author":"Gabrielsson-J\u00e4rhult","year":"2021","journal-title":"Scand J Prim Health Care"}],"container-title":["Frontiers in Digital Health"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.frontiersin.org\/articles\/10.3389\/fdgth.2024.1459684\/full","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,9]],"date-time":"2024-12-09T06:29:37Z","timestamp":1733725777000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.frontiersin.org\/articles\/10.3389\/fdgth.2024.1459684\/full"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,9]]},"references-count":36,"alternative-id":["10.3389\/fdgth.2024.1459684"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fdgth.2024.1459684","relation":{},"ISSN":["2673-253X"],"issn-type":[{"type":"electronic","value":"2673-253X"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,9]]},"article-number":"1459684"}}