{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,30]],"date-time":"2025-07-30T15:50:27Z","timestamp":1753890627178,"version":"3.41.2"},"reference-count":37,"publisher":"Frontiers Media SA","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,24]],"date-time":"2025-02-24T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1740355200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["frontiersin.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Front. Digit. Health"],"abstract":"<jats:sec><jats:title>Background<\/jats:title><jats:p>Health information exchange (HIE) is an information system that efficiently shares patient information across medical institutions. However, traditional consent methods, represented by opt-in and opt-out, face a trade-off between efficiency and ethical, making it difficult to fundamentally improve consent rates. To address this issue, we focused on default settings and proposed an innovative approach called the \u201ctwo-step consent model,\u201d which leverages the advantages of existing models using utility theory. We evaluated the acceptability of this method.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title><jats:p>An online survey was conducted with 2,000 participants registered with Japan's largest internet survey company. We compared and analyzed the consent rates of the opt-in, opt-out, and two-step consent models.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results<\/jats:title><jats:p>The opt-in model had a 29.5% consent rate, maximizing patient autonomy but increasing the burden and reducing efficiency. The opt-out model had a 95.0% consent rate but raised concerns among half of the respondents. The two-step consent model had a 68.5% consent rate, demonstrating its cost-effectiveness compared with traditional models.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Discussion<\/jats:title><jats:p>The two-step consent model, involving implicit and explicit consent when needed, ensures efficient consent acquisition while respecting patient autonomy. It is a cost-effective policy option that can overcome the ethical issues associated with the opt-out model. Introducing methods that leverage both opt-in and opt-out advantages is expected to address HIE stagnation.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title><jats:p>The two-step consent model is expected to improve consent rates by balancing the efficiency and quality of consent acquisition. To achieve this, patient education is crucial for raising awareness and understanding of HIE and its consent methods.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.3389\/fdgth.2025.1498072","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,24]],"date-time":"2025-02-24T06:38:55Z","timestamp":1740379135000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/crossmark-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Consent mechanisms and default effects in health information exchange in Japan"],"prefix":"10.3389","volume":"7","author":[{"given":"Atsushi","family":"Ito","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Fumihiko","family":"Nakamura","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"1965","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,24]]},"reference":[{"key":"B1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"203","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0042-1742519","article-title":"Transforming health data to actionable information: recent progress and future opportunities in health information exchange","volume":"31","author":"Sarkar","year":"2022","journal-title":"Yearbook Med Inform"},{"key":"B2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1259","DOI":"10.1093\/jamia\/ocy035","article-title":"The benefits of health information exchange: an updated systematic review","volume":"25","author":"Menachemi","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Am Med Inform Assoc"},{"key":"B3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"0204279","DOI":"10.7189\/jogh.09.020427","article-title":"Status of health information exchange: a comparison of six countries","volume":"9","author":"Payne","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Glob Health"},{"key":"B4","first-page":"63","article-title":"Factors for stagnation in the regional healthcare networks project: analysis of initial investment and management model","volume":"64","author":"Ito","year":"2021","journal-title":"Kaikei-Kensa Kenkyu"},{"article-title":"Sharing of medical data becomes hollow","year":"2019","author":"Shimbun","key":"B5"},{"key":"B6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"33","DOI":"10.1186\/s12911-017-0436-2","article-title":"Patients\u2019 support for health information exchange: a literature review and classification of key factors","volume":"17","author":"Esmaeilzadeh","year":"2017","journal-title":"BMC Med Inform Decis Mak"},{"year":"2020","key":"B7","article-title":"Examples of consent acquisition methods in regional medical information collaboration networks"},{"article-title":"Overview of National Regional Medical Information Collaboration Network Using ICT (2022 Edition), Nichii soken Working Paper, No. 475","year":"","author":"Ai","key":"B8"},{"key":"B9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"289","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-23633-9_12","volume-title":"Privacy Considerations for Health Information Exchanges, Medical Data Privacy Handbook","author":"Hill","year":"2015"},{"key":"B10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e56263","DOI":"10.2196\/preprints.56263","article-title":"Health information exchange use by healthcare workers in Japan: retrospective cohort study","volume":"12","author":"Suzumoto","year":"2024","journal-title":"JMIR Med Inform"},{"key":"B11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e100726","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjhci-2022-100726","article-title":"Electronic consent in clinical care: an international scoping review","volume":"30","author":"Chimonas","year":"2023","journal-title":"BMJ Health Care Inform"},{"key":"B12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijmedinf.2018.08.007","article-title":"Comparison of consumers\u2019 perspectives on different health information exchange (HIE) mechanisms: an experimental study","volume":"119","author":"Esmaeilzadeh","year":"2018","journal-title":"Int J Med Inform"},{"key":"B13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"7","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00055564","article-title":"Status quo bias in decision making","volume":"1","author":"Samuelson","year":"1988","journal-title":"J Risk Uncertain"},{"key":"B14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1039","DOI":"10.2307\/2937956","article-title":"Loss aversion in riskless choice: a reference-dependent model","volume":"106","author":"Tversky","year":"1991","journal-title":"Q J Econ"},{"key":"B15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"159","DOI":"10.1017\/bpp.2018.43","article-title":"When and why defaults influence decisions: a meta-analysis of default effects","volume":"3","author":"Jachimowicz","year":"2019","journal-title":"Behav Public Policy"},{"first-page":"61","volume-title":"Behavioral Public Policy: New Policy Design Utilizing Insights from Behavioral Economics","year":"2016","key":"B16"},{"key":"B17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"69","DOI":"10.1017\/S1930297500001844","article-title":"The default pull: an experimental demonstration of subtle default effects on preferences","volume":"7","author":"Dhingra","year":"2012","journal-title":"Judg Decis Mak"},{"volume-title":"Introduction to Industrial Organization","year":"2017","author":"Cabral","key":"B18"},{"key":"B19","first-page":"1","article-title":"Alliance of medical malls: conditions for the establishment of network practice","volume":"5","author":"Ito","year":"2021","journal-title":"J Jpn Manag"},{"key":"B20","unstructured":"Current status of regional medical information collaboration networks\n          \n          \n          2020"},{"year":"2018","key":"B21","article-title":"Yokohama City Government. Patient consent and information related to mutual collaboration, corresponding to Chapter 3 of the guidelines, Yokohama city ICT utilization regional medical collaboration network guidelines"},{"key":"B22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e42131","DOI":"10.2196\/42131","article-title":"Opt-In and opt-out consent procedures for the reuse of routinely recorded health data in scientific research and their consequences for consent rate and consent bias: systematic review","volume":"25","author":"de Man","year":"2023","journal-title":"J Med Internet Res"},{"key":"B23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e14","DOI":"10.37765\/ajmc.2020.42148","article-title":"Opt-in consent policies: potential barriers to hospital health information exchange","volume":"26","author":"Apathy","year":"2020","journal-title":"Am J Manag Care"},{"key":"B24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1338","DOI":"10.1126\/science.1091721","article-title":"Medicine \u2013 do defaults save lives?","volume":"302","author":"Johnson","year":"2003","journal-title":"Science"},{"key":"B25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"533","DOI":"10.1503\/cmaj.112120","article-title":"Informed consent for clinical treatment","volume":"184","author":"Hall","year":"2012","journal-title":"CMAJ"},{"key":"B26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"268","DOI":"10.1177\/1460458216647190","article-title":"Health information exchange: what do patients want?","volume":"23","author":"Medford-Davis","year":"2017","journal-title":"Health Inform J"},{"key":"B27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"25","DOI":"10.1186\/s12910-017-0185-x","article-title":"Factors affecting willingness to share electronic health data among California consumers","volume":"18","author":"Kim","year":"2017","journal-title":"BMC Med Ethics"},{"first-page":"106","volume-title":"Consultations with Doctors, Health at a Glance: Asia\/Pacific 2022 Measuring Progress Towards Universal Health Coverage","year":"2022","key":"B28"},{"key":"B29","first-page":"53","article-title":"Designing for trust: the crucial role in digital user experience","volume":"19","author":"Bhaskaran","year":"2024","journal-title":"J User Experience"},{"key":"B30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"40","DOI":"10.1186\/s40900-021-00281-2","article-title":"Perceptions of anonymised data use and awareness of the NHS data opt-out amongst patients, carers and healthcare staff","volume":"7","author":"Atkin","year":"2021","journal-title":"Res Involvement Engagement"},{"year":"2023","key":"B31","article-title":"Mechanisms for obtaining consent"},{"article-title":"Japanese hospitals increasingly at risk of cyberattacks. The Japan News","year":"2021","author":"Hata","key":"B32"},{"key":"B33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.2196\/16546","article-title":"Patients\u2019 willingness to share information in online patient communities: questionnaire study","volume":"22","author":"Zhu","year":"2020","journal-title":"J Med Internet Res"},{"key":"B34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1155\/2018\/3689618","article-title":"Strategic improvement for quality and satisfaction of hospital information systems","volume":"2018","author":"Kuo","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Healthc Eng"},{"key":"B35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e426","DOI":"10.37765\/ajmc.2022.89277","article-title":"Incentivizing data sharing among health plans, hospitals, and providers to improve quality","volume":"28","author":"Juhn","year":"2022","journal-title":"Am J Manag Care"},{"key":"B36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"731","DOI":"10.1111\/hex.13230","article-title":"Opt-in or opt-out health-care communication? A cross-sectional study","volume":"24","author":"Tong","year":"2021","journal-title":"Health Expect"},{"key":"B37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e0299430","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0299430","article-title":"From opt-out to opt-in consent for secondary use of medical data and residual biomaterial: an evaluation using the RE-AIM framework","volume":"19","author":"Lutomski","year":"2024","journal-title":"PLoS One"}],"container-title":["Frontiers in Digital Health"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.frontiersin.org\/articles\/10.3389\/fdgth.2025.1498072\/full","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,28]],"date-time":"2025-02-28T15:38:16Z","timestamp":1740757096000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.frontiersin.org\/articles\/10.3389\/fdgth.2025.1498072\/full"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,24]]},"references-count":37,"alternative-id":["10.3389\/fdgth.2025.1498072"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fdgth.2025.1498072","relation":{},"ISSN":["2673-253X"],"issn-type":[{"type":"electronic","value":"2673-253X"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,24]]},"article-number":"1498072"}}