{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,11]],"date-time":"2026-03-11T03:08:25Z","timestamp":1773198505200,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":60,"publisher":"Frontiers Media SA","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,10]],"date-time":"2026-03-10T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1773100800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"funder":[{"name":"JSPS KAKENHI","award":["JP22K03022"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["JP22K03022"]}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["frontiersin.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Front. Artif. Intell."],"abstract":"<jats:p>\n                    Public acceptance of artificial intelligence (AI) in legal decision-making has been primarily explained through individual differences in personality traits and general attitudes toward technology. However, emerging evidence suggests that contextual features of legal disputes themselves may systematically influence preferences for AI versus human adjudicators. Across two studies with Japanese participants (\n                    <jats:italic>N<\/jats:italic>\n                    \u202f=\u202f1,384 and\n                    <jats:italic>N<\/jats:italic>\n                    \u202f=\u202f596), we examined whether psychological characteristics of dispute content\u2014beyond demographics and individual traits\u2014shape acceptability judgments for algorithmic adjudication. Study 1 employed exploratory factor analysis on acceptability ratings across 46 legal dispute vignettes, revealing a robust two-dimensional structure distinguishing interpersonal-relational disputes (where human adjudicators were strongly preferred) from institutional-procedural disputes (where AI acceptance was comparatively higher, though not surpassing human preference in most cases). Study 2 replicated this dimensional structure in an independent sample and demonstrated that experimentally manipulated contextual features\u2014emotional involvement and prototypicality\u2014systematically modulated acceptability judgments, with effects varying by dispositional trust, AI-specific attitudes, and gender. AI-specific expectations emerged as the strongest predictor of acceptance (\n                    <jats:italic>\u03b7<\/jats:italic>\n                    <jats:sup>2<\/jats:sup>\n                    \u202f=\u202f0.252), and a three-way interaction among emotional involvement, gender, and prototypicality indicated that contextual effects are moderated by individual characteristics. These findings suggest that the psychological features of dispute content constitute an overlooked dimension in AI acceptance research, extending beyond technology acceptance models to fundamental questions about how individuals construe social problems and allocate adjudicative authority. We discuss limitations related to measurement approaches, alternative psychological mechanisms, and directions for future research employing real-world case materials and direct assessment of cognitive processes.\n                  <\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.3389\/frai.2026.1716094","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,10]],"date-time":"2026-03-10T06:43:38Z","timestamp":1773125018000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/crossmark-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Psychological features of dispute content and public acceptance of AI in legal adjudication: evidence for systematic variation beyond individual differences"],"prefix":"10.3389","volume":"9","author":[{"given":"Masahiro","family":"Fujita","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Faculty of Sociology, Kansai University","place":["Suita, Japan"]}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Eiichiro","family":"Watamura","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Graduate School of Human Sciences, Osaka University","place":["Suita, Japan"]}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"1965","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,10]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref1","first-page":"273","article-title":"Smart resolutions: exploring the role of artificial intelligence in alternative dispute resolution","volume":"73","author":"Ahmad","year":"2025","journal-title":"Cleve. State Law Rev."},{"key":"ref2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"179","DOI":"10.1016\/0749-5978(91)90020-T","article-title":"The theory of planned behavior","volume":"50","author":"Ajzen","year":"1991","journal-title":"Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process."},{"key":"ref3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e93","DOI":"10.7717\/peerj-cs.93","article-title":"Predicting judicial decisions of the European court of human rights: a natural language processing perspective","volume":"2","author":"Aletras","year":"2016","journal-title":"PeerJ Comput. Sci."},{"key":"ref4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"145","DOI":"10.1017\/pan.2018.57","article-title":"Paying attention to inattentive survey respondents","volume":"27","author":"Alvarez","year":"2019","journal-title":"Polit. Anal."},{"key":"ref5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"497","DOI":"10.1093\/ijpor\/edw007","article-title":"Answering without reading: IMCs and strong satisficing in online surveys","volume":"29","author":"Anduiza","year":"2017","journal-title":"Int. J. Public Opin. Res."},{"key":"ref6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"739","DOI":"10.1111\/ajps.12081","article-title":"Separating the shirkers from the workers? Making sure respondents pay attention on self-administered surveys","volume":"58","author":"Berinsky","year":"2014","journal-title":"Am. J. Polit. Sci."},{"key":"ref7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"460","DOI":"10.1177\/0013164410375112","article-title":"Item response modeling of forced-choice questionnaires","volume":"71","author":"Brown","year":"2011","journal-title":"Educ. Psychol. Meas."},{"key":"ref8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"317","DOI":"10.1080\/01402382.2011.546576","article-title":"Confidence in the judiciary: comparing the independence and legitimacy of judicial systems","volume":"34","author":"B\u00fchlmann","year":"2011","journal-title":"West Eur. Polit."},{"key":"ref9","volume-title":"Dual-process theories in social psychology","author":"Chaiken","year":"1999"},{"key":"ref10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"112","DOI":"10.3758\/s13428-013-0365-7","article-title":"Nonna\u00efvet\u00e9 among Amazon Mechanical Turk workers: consequences and solutions for behavioral researchers","volume":"46","author":"Chandler","year":"2014","journal-title":"Behav. Res."},{"key":"ref11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"293","DOI":"10.1207\/s1532690xci0804_2","article-title":"Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction","volume":"8","author":"Chandler","year":"1991","journal-title":"Cogn. Instr."},{"key":"ref12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"170","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1467-9280.1995.tb00327.x","article-title":"Response style and cross-cultural comparisons of rating scales among East Asian and North American students","volume":"6","author":"Chen","year":"1995","journal-title":"Psychol. Sci."},{"key":"ref13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"7","DOI":"10.7275\/jyj1-4868","article-title":"Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis","volume":"10","author":"Costello","year":"2005","journal-title":"Pract. Assess. Res. Eval."},{"key":"ref14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"319","DOI":"10.2307\/249008","article-title":"Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology","volume":"13","author":"Davis","year":"1989","journal-title":"MIS Q."},{"key":"ref15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e21","DOI":"10.1017\/dap.2024.53","article-title":"Artificial intelligence at the bench: legal and ethical challenges of informing\u2014or misinforming\u2014judicial decision-making through generative AI","volume":"6","author":"de la Osa","year":"2024","journal-title":"Data Policy"},{"key":"ref16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"93","DOI":"10.1287\/isre.1070.0153","article-title":"Research note: how does personality matter? Relating the five-factor model to technology acceptance and use","volume":"19","author":"Devaraj","year":"2008","journal-title":"Inf. Syst. Res."},{"key":"ref17","volume-title":"Scale development: theory and applications","author":"DeVellis","year":"2022"},{"key":"ref18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"106","DOI":"10.3758\/s13428-025-02618-1","article-title":"Evaluating mobile-based data collection for crowdsourcing behavioral research","volume":"57","author":"Esch","year":"2025","journal-title":"Behav. Res."},{"key":"ref19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"255","DOI":"10.1146\/annurev.psych.59.103006.093629","article-title":"Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition","volume":"59","author":"Evans","year":"2008","journal-title":"Annu. Rev. Psychol."},{"key":"ref20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"223","DOI":"10.1177\/1745691612460685","article-title":"Dual-process theories of higher cognition: advancing the debate","volume":"8","author":"Evans","year":"2013","journal-title":"Perspect. Psychol. Sci."},{"key":"ref21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"272","DOI":"10.1037\/1082-989X.4.3.272","article-title":"Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research","volume":"4","author":"Fabrigar","year":"1999","journal-title":"Psychol. Methods"},{"key":"ref22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"175","DOI":"10.3758\/BF03193146","article-title":"G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences","volume":"39","author":"Faul","year":"2007","journal-title":"Behav. Res. Methods"},{"key":"ref23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"476","DOI":"10.3390\/bs15040476","article-title":"Public perceptions of judges\u2019 use of AI tools in courtroom decision-making: an examination of legitimacy, fairness, trust, and procedural justice","volume":"15","author":"Fine","year":"2025","journal-title":"Behav. Sci."},{"key":"ref24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2105","DOI":"10.1126\/science.1062872","article-title":"An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment","volume":"293","author":"Greene","year":"2001","journal-title":"Science"},{"key":"ref25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"64","DOI":"10.2139\/ssrn.5049139","article-title":"AI in the courts: how worried should we be?","volume":"107","author":"Grimm","year":"2024","journal-title":"Judicature"},{"key":"ref26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"243","DOI":"10.1177\/1470595806066332","article-title":"Response styles in cross-national survey research: a 26-country study","volume":"6","author":"Harzing","year":"2006","journal-title":"Int. J. Cross Cult. Manag."},{"key":"ref27","volume-title":"Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: a regression-based approach","author":"Hayes","year":"2017"},{"key":"ref28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"56","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cognition.2014.11.025","article-title":"Laws of cognition and the cognition of law","volume":"135","author":"Kahan","year":"2015","journal-title":"Cognition"},{"key":"ref29","article-title":"Question and questionnaire design","volume-title":"Handbook of survey research","author":"Krosnick","year":"2010"},{"key":"ref30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"23","DOI":"10.1006\/obhd.1998.2781","article-title":"The influence of framing on risky decisions: a meta-analysis","volume":"75","author":"K\u00fchberger","year":"1998","journal-title":"Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process."},{"key":"ref31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1177\/2053951718756684","article-title":"Understanding perception of algorithmic decisions: fairness, trust, and emotion in response to algorithmic management","volume":"5","author":"Lee","year":"2018","journal-title":"Big Data Soc."},{"key":"ref32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1007\/978-1-4899-2115-4","volume-title":"The social psychology of procedural justice","author":"Lind","year":"1988"},{"key":"ref33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"246","DOI":"10.1037\/0033-295X.102.2.246","article-title":"A cognitive\u2013affective system theory of personality: reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure","volume":"102","author":"Mischel","year":"1995","journal-title":"Psychol. Rev."},{"key":"ref34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.14966\/jssp.31.1_1","article-title":"Mechanical Japanese: survey satisficing of online panels in Japan","volume":"31","author":"Miura","year":"2015","journal-title":"Jpn. J. Soc. Psychol."},{"key":"ref35","volume-title":"The big book of concepts","author":"Murphy","year":"2004"},{"key":"ref36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"81","DOI":"10.1111\/0022-4537.00153","article-title":"Machines and mindlessness: social responses to computers","volume":"56","author":"Nass","year":"2000","journal-title":"J. Soc. Issues"},{"key":"ref37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511605987","volume-title":"Education in the moral domain","author":"Nucci","year":"2001"},{"key":"ref38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"40","DOI":"10.2132\/personality.21.40","article-title":"An attempt to develop the Japanese version of the Ten Item Personality Inventory (TIPI-J)","volume":"21","author":"Oshio","year":"2012","journal-title":"Jpn. J. Pers."},{"key":"ref39","first-page":"133","article-title":"Evaluation of the \u201cgeographical advantage\u201d in jurisdiction and arbitration agreements and its implications for attitudes toward AI support systems","volume":"96","author":"Ota","year":"2023","journal-title":"Horitsu Ronso"},{"key":"ref40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"230","DOI":"10.1518\/001872097778543886","article-title":"Humans and automation: use, misuse, disuse, abuse","volume":"39","author":"Parasuraman","year":"1997","journal-title":"Hum. Factors"},{"key":"ref41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"192","DOI":"10.1037\/0096-3445.104.3.192","article-title":"Cognitive representations of semantic categories","volume":"104","author":"Rosch","year":"1975","journal-title":"J. Exp. Psychol. Gen."},{"key":"ref42","article-title":"Principles of categorization","volume-title":"Cognition and categorization","author":"Rosch","year":"1978"},{"key":"ref43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"573","DOI":"10.1016\/0010-0285(75)90024-9","article-title":"Family resemblances: studies in the internal structure of categories","volume":"7","author":"Rosch","year":"1975","journal-title":"Cogn. Psychol."},{"key":"ref44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"218","DOI":"10.1108\/eb028886","article-title":"Response categories and potential cultural bias: effects of an explicit middle point in cross-cultural surveys","volume":"6","author":"Si","year":"1998","journal-title":"Int. J. Organ. Anal."},{"key":"ref45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1207\/s15516709cog1601_1","article-title":"The case for rules in reasoning","volume":"16","author":"Smith","year":"1992","journal-title":"Cogn. Sci."},{"key":"ref46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1114","DOI":"10.3316\/informit.040979608613368","article-title":"Judge v robot?: artificial intelligence and judicial decision-making","volume":"41","author":"Sourdin","year":"2018","journal-title":"UNSW Law J."},{"key":"ref47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"99","DOI":"10.1207\/S15327752JPA8001_18","article-title":"Starting at the beginning: an introduction to coefficient alpha and internal consistency","volume":"80","author":"Streiner","year":"2003","journal-title":"J. Pers. Assess."},{"key":"ref48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"251","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1022193728205","article-title":"Cognitive architecture and instructional design","volume":"10","author":"Sweller","year":"1998","journal-title":"Educ. Psychol. Rev."},{"key":"ref49","volume-title":"Using multivariate statistics","author":"Tabachnick","year":"2012"},{"key":"ref50","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"184","DOI":"10.1016\/j.chb.2017.08.038","article-title":"Validity and Mechanical Turk: an assessment of exclusion methods and interactive experiments","volume":"77","author":"Thomas","year":"2017","journal-title":"Comp. Hum. Behav."},{"key":"ref51","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"440","DOI":"10.1037\/a0018963","article-title":"Construal-level theory of psychological distance","volume":"117","author":"Trope","year":"2010","journal-title":"Psychol. Rev."},{"key":"ref52","volume-title":"The development of social knowledge: morality and convention","author":"Turiel","year":"1983"},{"key":"ref53","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"103","DOI":"10.2307\/3053563","article-title":"What is procedural justice? Criteria used by citizens to assess the fairness of legal procedures","volume":"22","author":"Tyler","year":"1988","journal-title":"Law Soc. Rev."},{"key":"ref54","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1515\/9781400828609","volume-title":"Why people obey the law","author":"Tyler","year":"2006"},{"key":"ref55","volume-title":"Trust in the law: encouraging public cooperation with the police and courts","author":"Tyler","year":"2002"},{"key":"ref56","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"186","DOI":"10.2307\/3250921","article-title":"A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies","volume":"24","author":"Venkatesh","year":"2000","journal-title":"MIS Q."},{"key":"ref57","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"115","DOI":"10.2307\/3250981","article-title":"Why don\u2019t men ever stop to ask for directions? Gender, social influence, and their role in technology acceptance and usage behavior","volume":"24","author":"Venkatesh","year":"2000","journal-title":"MIS Q."},{"key":"ref58","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"100","DOI":"10.1111\/lsi.12175","article-title":"Measuring the rule of law: a comparison of indicators","volume":"42","author":"Versteeg","year":"2017","journal-title":"Law Soc. Inq."},{"key":"ref59","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"206","DOI":"10.1027\/1015-5759\/a000609","article-title":"The multidimensional forced-choice format as an alternative for rating scales: current state of the research","volume":"36","author":"Wetzel","year":"2020","journal-title":"Eur. J. Psychol. Assess."},{"key":"ref60","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"569","DOI":"10.1177\/1094428119836486","article-title":"Though forced, still valid: psychometric equivalence of forced-choice and single-statement measures","volume":"23","author":"Zhang","year":"2020","journal-title":"Organ. Res. Methods"}],"container-title":["Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.frontiersin.org\/articles\/10.3389\/frai.2026.1716094\/full","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,10]],"date-time":"2026-03-10T06:43:41Z","timestamp":1773125021000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.frontiersin.org\/articles\/10.3389\/frai.2026.1716094\/full"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,10]]},"references-count":60,"alternative-id":["10.3389\/frai.2026.1716094"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/frai.2026.1716094","relation":{},"ISSN":["2624-8212"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2624-8212","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,10]]},"article-number":"1716094"}}