{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,27]],"date-time":"2026-05-27T10:22:57Z","timestamp":1779877377229,"version":"3.53.1"},"reference-count":24,"publisher":"Frontiers Media SA","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,7]],"date-time":"2023-09-07T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1694044800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["frontiersin.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Front. Robot. AI"],"abstract":"<jats:p><jats:bold>Introduction:<\/jats:bold> Utilizing anthropomorphic features in industrial robots is a prevalent strategy aimed at enhancing their perception as collaborative team partners and promoting increased tolerance for failures. Nevertheless, recent research highlights the presence of potential drawbacks associated with this approach. It is still widely unknown, how anthropomorphic framing influences the dynamics of trust especially, in context of different failure experiences.<\/jats:p><jats:p><jats:bold>Method:<\/jats:bold> The current laboratory study wanted to close this research gap. To do so, fifty-one participants interacted with a robot that was either anthropomorphically or technically framed. In addition, each robot produced either a comprehensible or an incomprehensible failure.<\/jats:p><jats:p><jats:bold>Results:<\/jats:bold> The analysis revealed no differences in general trust towards the technically and anthropomorphically framed robot. Nevertheless, the anthropomorphic robot was perceived as more transparent than the technical robot. Furthermore, the robot\u2019s purpose was perceived as more positive after experiencing a comprehensible failure.<\/jats:p><jats:p><jats:bold>Discussion:<\/jats:bold> The perceived higher transparency of anthropomorphically framed robots might be a double-edged sword, as the actual transparency did not differ between both conditions. In general, the results show that it is essential to consider trust multi-dimensionally, as a uni-dimensional approach which is often focused on performance might overshadow important facets of trust like transparency and purpose.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.3389\/frobt.2023.1235017","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,7]],"date-time":"2023-09-07T09:31:57Z","timestamp":1694079117000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/crossmark-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":13,"title":["Anthropomorphic framing and failure comprehensibility influence different facets of trust towards industrial robots"],"prefix":"10.3389","volume":"10","author":[{"given":"Eileen","family":"Roesler","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1965","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,7]]},"reference":[{"key":"B1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"864","DOI":"10.1037\/0033-295x.114.4.864","article-title":"On seeing human: a three-factor theory of anthropomorphism","volume":"114","author":"Epley","year":"2007","journal-title":"Psychol. Rev."},{"key":"B2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1145\/3442677","article-title":"Tracking anthropomorphizing behavior in human-robot interaction","volume":"11","author":"Fischer","year":"2021","journal-title":"ACM Trans. Human-Robot Interact. (THRI)"},{"key":"B3","first-page":"55","article-title":"Matching robot appearance and behavior to tasks to improve human-robot cooperation","author":"Goetz","year":"2003"},{"key":"B4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"517","DOI":"10.1177\/0018720811417254","article-title":"A meta-analysis of factors affecting trust in human-robot interaction","volume":"53","author":"Hancock","year":"2011","journal-title":"Hum. Factors J. Hum. Factors Ergonomics Soc."},{"key":"B5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.2139\/ssrn.4113811","article-title":"\u201cIt\u2019s not paul, it\u2019s a robot\u201d: the impact of linguistic framing and the evolution of trust and distrust in a collaborative robot during a human-robot interaction","volume":"178","author":"Kopp","year":"2022","journal-title":"SSRN Electron. J."},{"key":"B6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.17705\/1jais.00411","article-title":"Technology, humanness, and trust: rethinking trust in technology","volume":"16","author":"Lankton","year":"2015","journal-title":"J. Assoc. Inf. Syst."},{"key":"B7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"50","DOI":"10.1518\/hfes.46.1.50_30392","article-title":"Trust in automation: designing for appropriate reliance","volume":"46","author":"Lee","year":"2004","journal-title":"Hum. factors"},{"key":"B8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"135","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-64816-3_8","article-title":"The role of trust in human-robot interaction","volume-title":"Foundations of trusted autonomy","author":"Lewis","year":"2018"},{"key":"B9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"241","DOI":"10.1518\/001872006777724408","article-title":"Automation failures on tasks easily performed by operators undermine trust in automated aids","volume":"48","author":"Madhavan","year":"2006","journal-title":"Hum. Factors"},{"key":"B10","first-page":"279","article-title":"Friends or foes? socioemotional support and gaze behaviors in mixed groups of humans and robots","author":"Oliveira","year":"2018"},{"key":"B11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1145\/3472224","article-title":"Impact of anthropomorphic robot design on trust and attention in industrial human-robot interaction","volume":"11","author":"Onnasch","year":"2021","journal-title":"J. Hum.-Robot Interact."},{"key":"B12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"833","DOI":"10.1007\/s12369-020-00666-5","article-title":"A taxonomy to structure and analyze human\u2013robot interaction","volume":"13","author":"Onnasch","year":"2021","journal-title":"Int. J. Soc. Robotics"},{"key":"B13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1311","DOI":"10.1177\/1071181319631209","article-title":"Anthropomorphizing robots: the effect of framing in human-robot collaboration","volume":"63","author":"Onnasch","year":"2019","journal-title":"SageJournals"},{"key":"B14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-022-07808-x","article-title":"Challenging presumed technological superiority when working with (artificial) colleagues","volume":"12","author":"Rieger","year":"2022","journal-title":"Sci. Rep."},{"key":"B15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"eabj5425","DOI":"10.1126\/scirobotics.abj5425","article-title":"A meta-analysis on the effectiveness of anthropomorphism in human-robot interaction","volume":"6","author":"Roesler","year":"2021","journal-title":"Sci. Robotics"},{"key":"B16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1155","DOI":"10.1007\/s12369-021-00860-z","article-title":"Why context matters: the influence of application domain on preferred degree of anthropomorphism and gender attribution in human-robot interaction","volume":"14","author":"Roesler","year":"","journal-title":"Int. J. Soc. Robotics"},{"key":"B17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"107","DOI":"10.1177\/1071181320641028","article-title":"The effect of anthropomorphism and failure comprehensibility on human-robot trust","volume":"64","author":"Roesler","year":"2020","journal-title":"SageJournals"},{"key":"B18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2047","DOI":"10.1177\/1071181322661065","article-title":"Trust towards human vs. automated agents: using a multidimensional trust questionnaire to assess the role of performance, utility, purpose, and transparency","volume":"66","author":"Roesler","year":"","journal-title":"Proc. Hum. Factors Ergonomics Soc. Annu. Meet."},{"key":"B19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1145\/2696454.2696497","article-title":"Would you trust a (faulty) robot?","author":"Salem","year":"2015"},{"key":"B20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"614","DOI":"10.1177\/0018720818816838","article-title":"The relationship between trust and use choice in human-robot interaction","volume":"61","author":"Sanders","year":"2019","journal-title":"Hum. Factors J. Hum. Factors Ergonomics Soc."},{"key":"B21","volume-title":"Effects of faults, experience, and personality on trust in a robot co-worker","author":"Sarkar","year":"2017"},{"key":"B22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"525","DOI":"10.1177\/0018720816644364","article-title":"Human-robot interaction: status and challenges","volume":"58","author":"Sheridan","year":"2016","journal-title":"Hum. Factors J. Hum. Factors Ergonomics Soc."},{"key":"B23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"219","DOI":"10.1177\/1745691610369336","article-title":"Who sees human? the stability and importance of individual differences in anthropomorphism","volume":"5","author":"Waytz","year":"2010","journal-title":"Perspect. Psychol. Sci."},{"key":"B24","first-page":"621","article-title":"Entwicklung und evaluation eines mehrdimensionalen fragebogens zur messung von vertrauen in technische systeme","volume-title":"Reflexionen und Visionen der Mensch-Maschine-Interaktion\u2013Aus der Vergangenheit lernen, Zukunft gestalten","author":"Wiczorek","year":"2011"}],"container-title":["Frontiers in Robotics and AI"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.frontiersin.org\/articles\/10.3389\/frobt.2023.1235017\/full","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,7]],"date-time":"2023-09-07T09:32:02Z","timestamp":1694079122000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.frontiersin.org\/articles\/10.3389\/frobt.2023.1235017\/full"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,7]]},"references-count":24,"alternative-id":["10.3389\/frobt.2023.1235017"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/frobt.2023.1235017","relation":{},"ISSN":["2296-9144"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2296-9144","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,7]]},"article-number":"1235017"}}