{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,24]],"date-time":"2026-08-24T15:09:32Z","timestamp":1787584172866,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":26,"publisher":"Frontiers Media SA","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,12,1]],"date-time":"2022-12-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1669852800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["frontiersin.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol."],"abstract":"<jats:p><jats:bold>Purpose:<\/jats:bold> To develop predictive models for the intraocular pressure (IOP) of patients undergoing small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) procedures, measured with a noncontact tonometer (NCT), Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT), and an ocular response analyzer (ORA).<\/jats:p><jats:p><jats:bold>Methods:<\/jats:bold> In this prospective study, a total of 104 eyes (\u22126.23 \u00b1 2.06 diopters) of 52 patients (24.38 \u00b1 4.76\u00a0years) undergoing SMILE procedures were included. The intraocular pressure was measured (IOP<jats:sub>NCT<\/jats:sub> with NCT, IOP<jats:sub>GAT<\/jats:sub> with GAT, and IOPcc and IOPg with ORA) before surgery and at postoperative 6\u00a0months. Information on age, preoperative and attempted spherical equivalent (SE), ablation depth, preoperative values and postoperative changes in central corneal thickness (CCT), K1, K2, Km, corneal hysteresis (CH) and corneal resistance factor (CRF) values was collected in order to predict IOPs.<\/jats:p><jats:p><jats:bold>Results:<\/jats:bold> All surgeries were uneventful. At postoperative 6\u00a0months, the efficacy and safety index were 1.04 \u00b1 0.15 and 1.08 \u00b1 0.18, respectively. Significant decreases were detected in postoperative IOP<jats:sub>NCT<\/jats:sub>, IOP<jats:sub>GAT<\/jats:sub>, IOPcc, and IOPg compared to preoperative values (all <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic> &amp;lt; 0.001). No relationship was found between any IOP and ablation depth, attempted SE, and preoperative SE, as well as CCT<jats:sub>difference<\/jats:sub> (all <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic> &amp;gt; 0.05). Predictive models for IOPs were constructed to predict preoperative values, and <jats:italic>R<\/jats:italic><jats:sup>2<\/jats:sup> values were 67.5% (IOP<jats:sub>NCT<\/jats:sub>), 64.5% (IOP<jats:sub>GAT<\/jats:sub>), 78.7% (IOPcc), and 82.0% (IOPg). The prediction band of IOP<jats:sub>NCT<\/jats:sub> and IOP<jats:sub>GAT<\/jats:sub> was 7.4\u201315.1\u00a0mmHg and 8\u201316\u00a0mmHg, respectively.<\/jats:p><jats:p><jats:bold>Conclusion:<\/jats:bold> Predictive models for IOP measurements after SMILE procedures can be helpful in clinical practice.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.3389\/fbioe.2022.1030458","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,12,1]],"date-time":"2022-12-01T17:57:21Z","timestamp":1669917441000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/crossmark-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"title":["Predictive models for IOPs measured with NCT, GAT, and ORA among patients undergoing SMILE"],"prefix":"10.3389","volume":"10","author":[{"given":"Tian","family":"Han","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Wanru","family":"Shi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Yingjun","family":"Chen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Yang","family":"Shen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ye","family":"Xu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Xingtao","family":"Zhou","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1965","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,12,1]]},"reference":[{"key":"B1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1080\/02713683.2022.2103569","article-title":"Corneal biomechanics losses caused by refractive surgery","author":"Bao","year":"2022","journal-title":"Curr. Eye Res."},{"key":"B2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1009","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2004.12.033","article-title":"Change in intraocular pressure measurements after LASIK the effect of the refractive correction and the lamellar flap","volume":"112","author":"Chang","year":"2005","journal-title":"Ophthalmology"},{"key":"B3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"581","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2018.01.023","article-title":"Clinical evaluation of a new correction algorithm for dynamic Scheimpflug analyzer tonometry before and after laser in situ keratomileusis and small-incision lenticule extraction","volume":"44","author":"Chen","year":"2018","journal-title":"J. Cataract. Refract. Surg."},{"key":"B4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"967","DOI":"10.1097\/j.jcrs.0000000000000204","article-title":"Effectiveness of 4 tonometers in measuring IOP after femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK, SMILE, and transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy","volume":"46","author":"Chen","year":"2020","journal-title":"J. Cataract. Refract. Surg."},{"key":"B5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"652","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1755-3768.1975.tb01784.x","article-title":"Biometric correlations of corneal thickness","volume":"53","author":"Ehlers","year":"1975","journal-title":"Acta Ophthalmol."},{"key":"B6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"888","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2013.01.035","article-title":"Comparison of intraocular pressures after myopic laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy: Tonometry-pachymetry, Goldmann applanation tonometry, dynamic contour tonometry, and noncontact tonometry","volume":"39","author":"Han","year":"2013","journal-title":"J. Cataract. Refract. Surg."},{"key":"B7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1309","DOI":"10.2147\/OPTH.S132578","article-title":"Comparison of different intraocular pressure measurement techniques in normal eyes and post small incision lenticule extraction","volume":"11","author":"Hosny","year":"2017","journal-title":"Clin. Ophthalmol."},{"key":"B8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"35","DOI":"10.1097\/IJG.0b013e31820275b4","article-title":"IOP measured by dynamic contour tonometry correlates with IOP measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry and non-contact tonometry in Japanese individuals","volume":"21","author":"Ito","year":"2012","journal-title":"J. Glaucoma"},{"key":"B9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1637","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2012.04.033","article-title":"Change in intraocular pressure measurement 2 years after myopic laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy","volume":"38","author":"Johannesson","year":"2012","journal-title":"J. Cataract. Refract. Surg."},{"key":"B10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"263","DOI":"10.3928\/1081-597x-20060301-11","article-title":"A correction formula for the real intraocular pressure after LASIK for the correction of myopic astigmatism","volume":"22","author":"Kohlhaas","year":"2006","journal-title":"J. Refract. Surg."},{"key":"B11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"10","DOI":"10.1016\/s0966-6362(98)00043-5","article-title":"Bootstrap prediction and confidence bands: A superior statistical method for analysis of gait data","volume":"9","author":"Lenhoff","year":"1999","journal-title":"Gait Posture"},{"key":"B12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"4180","DOI":"10.1167\/iovs.16-19615","article-title":"Intraocular pressure changes and relationship with corneal biomechanics after SMILE and FS-LASIK","volume":"57","author":"Li","year":"2016","journal-title":"Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci."},{"key":"B13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e0147699","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0147699","article-title":"Factors influencing intraocular pressure changes after laser in situ keratomileusis with flaps created by femtosecond laser or mechanical microkeratome","volume":"11","author":"Lin","year":"2016","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"B14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1155\/2018\/6040873","article-title":"Corneal cap thickness and its effect on visual acuity and corneal biomechanics in eyes undergoing small incision lenticule extraction","volume":"2018","author":"Liu","year":"2018","journal-title":"J. Ophthalmol."},{"key":"B15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1989","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2011.03.012","article-title":"Myopia as a risk factor for open-angle glaucoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"118","author":"Marcus","year":"2011","journal-title":"Ophthalmology"},{"key":"B16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"364","DOI":"10.1097\/01.ijg.0000212268.42606.97","article-title":"Evaluation of the influence of corneal biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure measurements using the ocular response analyzer","volume":"15","author":"Medeiros","year":"2006","journal-title":"J. Glaucoma"},{"key":"B17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"968","DOI":"10.1167\/iovs.07-0280","article-title":"Reproducibility and clinical relevance of the ocular response analyzer in nonoperated eyes: Corneal biomechanical and tonometric implications","volume":"49","author":"Moreno-Montanes","year":"2008","journal-title":"Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci."},{"key":"B18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"103","DOI":"10.1097\/ICU.0000000000000129","article-title":"Measuring intraocular pressure","volume":"26","author":"Okafor","year":"2015","journal-title":"Curr. Opin. Ophthalmol."},{"key":"B19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"39","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajo.2006.09.036","article-title":"Changes in corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure following LASIK using static, dynamic, and noncontact tonometry","volume":"143","author":"Pepose","year":"2007","journal-title":"Am. J. Ophthalmol."},{"key":"B20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e419","DOI":"10.1097\/IJG.0000000000000338","article-title":"Effect of laser in situ keratomileusis on schiotz, Goldmann, and dynamic contour tonometric measurements","volume":"25","author":"Sales-Sanz","year":"2016","journal-title":"J. Glaucoma"},{"key":"B21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"471","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2014.09.033","article-title":"Factors that influence intraocular pressure changes after myopic and hyperopic LASIK and photorefractive keratectomy: A large population study","volume":"122","author":"Schallhorn","year":"2015","journal-title":"Ophthalmology"},{"key":"B22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"310","DOI":"10.3928\/1081597x-20140422-01","article-title":"Comparison of corneal deformation parameters after SMILE, LASEK, and femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK","volume":"30","author":"Shen","year":"2014","journal-title":"J. Refract. Surg."},{"key":"B23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"205","DOI":"10.1186\/s12886-016-0381-3","article-title":"Changes in intraocular pressure values measured with noncontact tonometer (NCT), ocular response analyzer (ORA) and corvis scheimpflug technology tonometer (CST) in the early phase after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE)","volume":"16","author":"Shen","year":"2016","journal-title":"BMC Ophthalmol."},{"key":"B24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"855367","DOI":"10.3389\/fbioe.2022.855367","article-title":"Effects of laser in situ keratomileusis and small-incision lenticule extraction on corneal biomechanical behavior: A finite element analysis","volume":"10","author":"Wang","year":"2022","journal-title":"Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol."},{"key":"B25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"834270","DOI":"10.3389\/fbioe.2022.834270","article-title":"Biomechanical effects of tPRK, FS-LASIK, and SMILE on the cornea","volume":"10","author":"Xin","year":"2022","journal-title":"Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol."},{"key":"B26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"530","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajo.2005.10.022","article-title":"A predictive model for postoperative intraocular pressure among patients undergoing laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK)","volume":"141","author":"Yang","year":"2006","journal-title":"Am. J. Ophthalmol."}],"container-title":["Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.frontiersin.org\/articles\/10.3389\/fbioe.2022.1030458\/full","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,12,1]],"date-time":"2022-12-01T17:57:23Z","timestamp":1669917443000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.frontiersin.org\/articles\/10.3389\/fbioe.2022.1030458\/full"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,12,1]]},"references-count":26,"alternative-id":["10.3389\/fbioe.2022.1030458"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fbioe.2022.1030458","relation":{},"ISSN":["2296-4185"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2296-4185","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,12,1]]},"article-number":"1030458"}}