{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,30]],"date-time":"2026-09-30T04:56:47Z","timestamp":1790744207393,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":28,"publisher":"Frontiers Media SA","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,1,15]],"date-time":"2025-01-15T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1736899200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["frontiersin.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Front. Cardiovasc. Med."],"abstract":"\n Objective<\/jats:title>\n This meta-analysis elucidates the efficacy of the Transradial Band Device (TR Band) in minimizing complications like radial artery occlusion and hematoma, preserving heart health, and enhancing blood flow post-transradial catheterization.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Methods<\/jats:title>\n A comprehensive literature search across databases including PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase examined the impact of radial artery compression techniques and decompression times on complications. Data from 13 studies were analyzed using R 4.1.2 with fixed-effects and random-effects models. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale assessed the risk of bias in observational cohort studies.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Results<\/jats:title>\n \n In our meta-analysis, we evaluated data from various studies encompassing different air volumes in transradial band devices across several outcomes including bleeding, hematoma, radial artery occlusion (RAO), Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores, and compression time. The collective analysis integrated findings from 11 studies, totaling 4,679 patients. No significant difference in bleeding risk (OR 1.04, 95% CI 0.60\u20131.82,\n p<\/jats:italic>\n \u2009&gt;\u20090.05,\n I<\/jats:italic>\n 2<\/jats:sup>\n \u2009=\u200978%), hematoma incidence (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.78\u20131.19,\n p<\/jats:italic>\n \u2009&gt;\u20090.05,\n I<\/jats:italic>\n 2<\/jats:sup>\n \u2009=\u20090%), or RAO incidence (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.78\u20131.19,\n p<\/jats:italic>\n \u2009&gt;\u20090.05,\n I<\/jats:italic>\n 2<\/jats:sup>\n \u2009=\u20090%) was observed between the \u201cLess air\u201d and \u201c15\u2005ml air\u201d groups. However, the \u201cLess air\u201d group reported significantly higher VAS scores indicating increased pain or discomfort (Mean Difference 0.25, 95% CI 0.09\u20130.41,\n p<\/jats:italic>\n \u2009&lt;\u20090.05,\n I<\/jats:italic>\n 2<\/jats:sup>\n \u2009=\u20090%). Compression time analyses showed no significant difference between groups (Mean Difference \u221217.73, 95% CI \u221254.65\u201319.20,\n p<\/jats:italic>\n \u2009&gt;\u20090.05,\n I<\/jats:italic>\n 2<\/jats:sup>\n \u2009=\u200999%). Sensitivity analyses confirmed the stability of these findings, and Egger's test indicated no significant publication bias across the outcomes. This synthesis highlights the nuanced impact of air volume adjustments in transradial bands on patient outcomes, emphasizing the necessity for further research and standardized protocols to optimize patient safety and comfort post-intervention.\n <\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n The TR Band, when utilized with optimized air volume\/pressure, maintains an essential balance between ensuring hemostasis and enhancing patient comfort without elevating the risk of radial artery complications. These findings support the careful selection of TR Band settings to optimize clinical outcomes in patients undergoing transradial cardiac procedures. Further research is warranted to establish standardized guidelines for the most effective use of TR Band in various clinical scenarios.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.3389\/fcvm.2024.1412479","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,1,15]],"date-time":"2025-01-15T08:59:05Z","timestamp":1736931545000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/crossmark-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":5,"title":["Enhancing heart and circulatory well-being through optimized radial artery techniques: a meta-analysis of hemostasis and patient comfort"],"prefix":"10.3389","volume":"11","author":[{"given":"Yanru","family":"Yang","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Capital Medical University, Beijing LuHe Hospital","place":["Beijing, China"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Hongyan","family":"Zhu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Capital Medical University, Beijing LuHe Hospital","place":["Beijing, China"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Guangyao","family":"Zhai","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Capital Medical University, Beijing LuHe Hospital","place":["Beijing, China"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1965","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,1,15]]},"reference":[{"key":"B1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2","DOI":"10.1016\/j.carrev.2019.03.002","article-title":"Comparison of transradial and transfemoral approaches for coronary angiography and percutaneous intervention in patients with coronary bypass grafts","volume":"21","author":"Hirzallah","year":"2020","journal-title":"Cardiovasc Revasc Med"},{"key":"B2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"23","DOI":"10.1016\/j.amjcard.2020.11.016","article-title":"Meta-analysis of transradial vs transfemoral access for percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction","volume":"141","author":"Jhand","year":"2021","journal-title":"Am J Cardiol"},{"key":"B3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"361","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcin.2020.11.042","article-title":"Access-site crossover in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing invasive management","volume":"14","author":"Gragnano","year":"2021","journal-title":"JACC Cardiovasc Interv"},{"key":"B4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"47","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijcard.2021.10.003","article-title":"Outcomes of distal versus conventional transradial access for coronary angiography and intervention: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"344","author":"Mhanna","year":"2021","journal-title":"Int J Cardiol"},{"key":"B5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2163","DOI":"10.3390\/jcm10102163","article-title":"Radial access for coronary angiography carries fewer complications compared with femoral access: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials","volume":"10","author":"Bajraktari","year":"2021","journal-title":"J Clin Med"},{"key":"B6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"222","DOI":"10.1016\/j.carrev.2019.04.012","article-title":"Radial approach for left gastric artery angiography and embolization for the treatment of obesity: technical considerations","volume":"21","author":"Pirlet","year":"2020","journal-title":"Cardiovasc Revasc Med"},{"key":"B7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"640","DOI":"10.1093\/ehjqcco\/qcac018","article-title":"Transradial versus transfemoral approach for percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"8","author":"Ahsan","year":"2022","journal-title":"Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes"},{"key":"B8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"409","DOI":"10.1177\/02184923211027790","article-title":"Role of trans-radial band protocols in radial artery occlusion: randomized trial","volume":"30","author":"Rahman","year":"2022","journal-title":"Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann"},{"key":"B9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2345584","DOI":"10.1155\/2022\/2345584","article-title":"Study on the safety of the new radial artery hemostasis device","volume":"2022","author":"Wu","year":"2022","journal-title":"J Interv Cardiol"},{"key":"B10","year":"2021","journal-title":"R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing"},{"key":"B11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"192","DOI":"10.1097\/JCN.0000000000000115","article-title":"A comparison of 2 devices for radial artery hemostasis after transradial coronary intervention","volume":"30","author":"Dai","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Cardiovasc Nurs"},{"key":"B12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"374","DOI":"10.1016\/j.amjcard.2017.04.037","article-title":"Usefulness of a gentle and short hemostasis using the transradial band device after transradial access for percutaneous coronary angiography and interventions to reduce the radial artery occlusion rate (from the prospective and randomized CRASOC I, II, and III studies)","volume":"120","author":"Dangoisse","year":"2017","journal-title":"Am J Cardiol"},{"key":"B13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"217","DOI":"10.1097\/JCN.0000000000000639","article-title":"Two hemostasis methods after transradial catheterization: thematic randomized clinical trial","volume":"35","author":"Dos Santos","year":"2020","journal-title":"J Cardiovasc Nurs"},{"key":"B14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1349","DOI":"10.4244\/EIJ-D-19-00207","article-title":"Radial artery dilatation to improve access and lower complications during coronary angiography: the RADIAL trial: improving radial artery access","volume":"16","author":"Doubell","year":"2021","journal-title":"EuroIntervention"},{"key":"B15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e0181099","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0181099","article-title":"Hemostasis pad combined with compression device after transradial coronary procedures: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"12","author":"Kang","year":"2017","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"B16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1050","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcin.2018.03.042","article-title":"Manual versus mechanical compression of the radial artery after transradial coronary angiography: the MEMORY multicenter randomized trial","volume":"11","author":"Petroglou","year":"2018","journal-title":"JACC Cardiovasc Interv"},{"key":"B17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"151","DOI":"10.1016\/j.amjcard.2021.12.020","article-title":"Association of palmar arch collateral function and radial artery occlusion after transradial access","volume":"168","author":"Bigler","year":"2022","journal-title":"Am J Cardiol"},{"key":"B18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"159","DOI":"10.4103\/abr.abr_164_16","article-title":"Compare complication of classic versus patent hemostasis in transradial coronary angiography","volume":"6","author":"Roghani","year":"2017","journal-title":"Adv Biomed Res"},{"key":"B19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e35129","DOI":"10.7759\/cureus.35129","article-title":"Do we still need to assess post-procedural radial artery compression time and radial artery occlusion in patients who undergo transradial coronary intervention?","volume":"15","author":"Bardooli","year":"2023","journal-title":"Cureus"},{"key":"B20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"580","DOI":"10.1093\/eurjcn\/zvab004","article-title":"Is radial artery occlusion and local vascular complications following transradial coronary procedures affected by the type of hemostasis device used? A non-inferiority randomized controlled trial (RadCom trial)","volume":"20","author":"Due-T\u00f8nnessen","year":"2021","journal-title":"Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs"},{"key":"B21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"467","DOI":"10.1002\/ccd.21900","article-title":"Radial compression guided by mean artery pressure versus standard compression with a pneumatic device (RACOMAP)","volume":"73","author":"Cubero","year":"2009","journal-title":"Catheter Cardiovasc Interv"},{"key":"B22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"344","DOI":"10.1177\/1474515116672123","article-title":"A randomized controlled study of standard versus accelerated deflation of the terumo radial band hemostasis device after transradial diagnostic cardiac catheterization","volume":"16","author":"Deuling","year":"2017","journal-title":"Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs"},{"key":"B23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"445","DOI":"10.1097\/JCN.0000000000000268","article-title":"Randomized comparison of 3 hemostasis techniques after transradial coronary intervention","volume":"31","author":"Cong","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Cardiovasc Nurs"},{"key":"B24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"221","DOI":"10.19779\/j.cnki.2096-3602.2018.04.05","article-title":"A comparative study of TR band and a new hemostatic compression device after transradial coronary catheterization","volume":"1","author":"Wang","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Interv Med"},{"key":"B25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3443","DOI":"10.1002\/sim.2380","article-title":"A modified test for small-study effects in meta-analyses of controlled trials with binary endpoints","volume":"25","author":"Harbord","year":"2006","journal-title":"Stat Methods Med Res"},{"key":"B26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1586","DOI":"10.1161\/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.025021","article-title":"Comparison of the efficacy and safety of early rule-out pathways for acute myocardial infarction","volume":"135","author":"Chapman","year":"2017","journal-title":"Circulation"},{"key":"B27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1409","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(11)60404-2","article-title":"Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes (RIVAL): a randomized parallel group, multicenter trial","volume":"377","author":"Jolly","year":"2011","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"B28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"5974","DOI":"10.3390\/jcm10245974","article-title":"Distal radial artery access for coronary and peripheral procedures: a multicenter experience","volume":"10","author":"Achim","year":"2021","journal-title":"J Clin Med"}],"updated-by":[{"DOI":"10.3389\/fcvm.2026.1797736","type":"correction","label":"Correction","source":"publisher","updated":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,11]],"date-time":"2026-02-11T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1770768000000}}],"container-title":["Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.frontiersin.org\/articles\/10.3389\/fcvm.2024.1412479\/full","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,11]],"date-time":"2026-02-11T13:01:39Z","timestamp":1770814899000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.frontiersin.org\/articles\/10.3389\/fcvm.2024.1412479\/full"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,1,15]]},"references-count":28,"alternative-id":["10.3389\/fcvm.2024.1412479"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fcvm.2024.1412479","relation":{},"ISSN":["2297-055X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2297-055X","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,1,15]]},"article-number":"1412479"}}