{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,11]],"date-time":"2025-11-11T06:34:55Z","timestamp":1762842895507,"version":"build-2065373602"},"reference-count":16,"publisher":"Frontiers Media SA","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,11]],"date-time":"2025-11-11T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1762819200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["frontiersin.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Front. Cardiovasc. Med."],"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Current guidelines lack long-term evidence comparing single left ventricular pacing (LUVP) with standard biventricular pacing (BVP) in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). This study evaluates the clinical superiority of rate-adaptive atrioventricular delay (RAAVD) algorithm-guided LUVP over BVP.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      In this retrospective cohort study, 67 consecutive patients meeting the criteria for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with complete left bundle branch block (CLBBB) were enrolled between April 2013 and April 2023. They were assigned to either the right atrium-left ventricle dual-site pacing group (RAAVD LUVP,\n                      <jats:italic>n<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u200942) or the biventricular pacing group (BVP,\n                      <jats:italic>n<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u200925), with a median follow-up duration of 43.59 months. The primary endpoints included disease-related rehospitalization, device complications, and battery longevity. Secondary outcomes comprised cardiac structure, function, and synchrony.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics such as preoperative ejection fraction and cardiomyopathy type between the groups. The RAAVD LUVP group demonstrated significant advantages: i) Rehospitalization rate (23.8% vs. 48.0%,\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u20090.041); ii) Zero device complications vs. 12% in BVP (\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u20090.048), iii) Extended battery longevity (7.95\u2009\u00b1\u20090.78 vs. 4.66\u2009\u00b1\u20090.66 years,\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009&amp;lt;\u20090.001); iv) Cardiac function (LVEF: 45.7\u2009\u00b1\u200913.3% vs. 38.9\u2009\u00b1\u200910.6%,\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u20090.034; The 6-minute walk distance: 414.50\u2009\u00b1\u200968.79\u2005m vs. 379.04\u2009\u00b1\u200958.02\u2005m;\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u20090.034); v) Cardiac structure (LAD: 35.55\u2009\u00b1\u20097.11\u2005mm vs. 39.96\u2009\u00b1\u20098.25\u2005mm,\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u20090.018; LVEDd: 60.10\u2009\u00b1\u200910.85\u2005mm vs. 67.68\u2009\u00b1\u20099.40\u2005mm,\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u20090.01), and vi) Cardiac synchronization (\n                      <jats:bold>paced QRS duration<\/jats:bold>\n                      : 129.00\u2009\u00b1\u200918.78 vs. 147.96\u2009\u00b1\u200926.13\u2005ms,\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u20090.001; Ts-SD12: 96.66\u2009\u00b1\u200951.51\u2005ms vs. 122.12\u2009\u00b1\u200952.29\u2005ms;\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u20090.034). Subgroup analysis revealed left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) further enhanced interventricular synchrony compared to lateral vein pacing (IVMD: 37.74\u2009\u00b1\u200921.24 vs. 53.11\u2009\u00b1\u200919.42\u2005ms,\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u20090.020).\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The dynamic integration of RAAVD LUVP with intrinsic conduction brings CRT closer to physiological states, which provides sustained clinical benefits compared to conventional BVP. The additional electromechanical advantages of LBBAP are related to the choice of anatomical location.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.3389\/fcvm.2025.1659901","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,11]],"date-time":"2025-11-11T06:32:19Z","timestamp":1762842739000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/crossmark-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Long-term benefits of single left ventricular pacing based on rate-adaptive atrioventricular delay algorithm in cardiac resynchronization therapy"],"prefix":"10.3389","volume":"12","author":[{"given":"Xuejing","family":"Yan","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Xuejuan","family":"Ma","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Lulu","family":"Zhao","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Guihu","family":"Sun","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Ling","family":"Zhao","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Wenkai","family":"Xu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Jing","family":"Wang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Lijin","family":"Pu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"1965","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,11]]},"reference":[{"key":"B1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"669","DOI":"10.3967\/bes2024.162","article-title":"Report on cardiovascular health and diseases in China 2022: an updated summary","volume":"36","year":"2023","journal-title":"Biomed Environ Sci"},{"key":"B2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3503","DOI":"10.1093\/eurheartj\/ehad194","article-title":"ESC Guidelines for the management of cardiomyopathies","volume":"44","author":"Arbelo","year":"2023","journal-title":"Eur Heart J"},{"key":"B3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"521","DOI":"10.1253\/circj.CJ-10-1268","article-title":"Non-responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy: the magnitude of the problem and the issues","volume":"75","author":"Auricchio","year":"2011","journal-title":"Circ J"},{"key":"B4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"124","DOI":"10.1007\/s00399-020-00694-8","article-title":"Left bundle branch pacing","volume":"31","author":"Sundaram","year":"2020","journal-title":"Herzschr Ittmacherther Elektrophysiol"},{"key":"B5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3971","DOI":"10.12659\/MSM.904348","article-title":"Left univentricular pacing by rate-adaptive atrioventricular delay in treatment of chronic heart failure","volume":"23","author":"Zhao","year":"2017","journal-title":"Med Sci Monit"},{"key":"B6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"118","DOI":"10.11909\/j.issn.1671-5411.2017.02.006","article-title":"Left univentricular pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy using rate-adaptive atrioventricular delay","volume":"14","author":"Pu","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Geriatr Cardiol"},{"key":"B7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"432","DOI":"10.1111\/pace.14700","article-title":"Left bundle branch pacing versus biventricular pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"46","author":"Parlavecchio","year":"2023","journal-title":"Pacing Clin Electrophysiol"},{"key":"B8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e009261","DOI":"10.1161\/CIRCEP.120.009261","article-title":"Long-Term safety and feasibility of left bundle branch pacing in a large single-center study","volume":"14","author":"Su","year":"2021","journal-title":"Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol"},{"key":"B9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"22202","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-023-48820-z","article-title":"Feasibility study on cardiac resynchronization in the treatment of heart failure by single left bundle branch pacing","volume":"13","author":"Du","year":"2023","journal-title":"Sci Rep"},{"key":"B10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"58","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rec.2013.11.003","article-title":"2013 ESC guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy","volume":"67","author":"Brignole","year":"2014","journal-title":"Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed)"},{"key":"B11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1208","DOI":"10.1093\/europace\/euad043","article-title":"EHRA clinical consensus statement on conduction system pacing implantation: endorsed by the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), Canadian Heart Rhythm Society (CHRS), and Latin American Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS)","volume":"25","author":"Burri","year":"2023","journal-title":"Europace"},{"key":"B12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"10","DOI":"10.3760\/cma.j.cn.113859-20201110-00290","article-title":"Chinese Expert consensus on His-Purkinje conduction system pacing","volume":"25","year":"2021","journal-title":"Chin J Cardiac Arrhythm"},{"key":"B13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1315","DOI":"10.1111\/pace.14836","article-title":"Outcomes of left bundle branch area pacing compared to His bundle pacing as a primary pacing strategy: systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"46","author":"Abdin","year":"2023","journal-title":"Pacing Clin Electrophysiol"},{"key":"B14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1266","DOI":"10.1002\/ehf2.12523","article-title":"Contrast-induced nephropathy after cardiac resynchronization therapy implant impairs the recovery of ejection fraction in responders","volume":"6","author":"Strisciuglio","year":"2019","journal-title":"ESC Heart Fail"},{"key":"B15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"843969","DOI":"10.3389\/fcvm.2022.843969","article-title":"Three-dimensional electroanatomical mapping guidelines for the selection of pacing site to achieve cardiac resynchronization therapy","volume":"9","author":"Hua","year":"2022","journal-title":"Front Cardiovasc Med"},{"key":"B16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"131830","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijcard.2024.131830","article-title":"Redefining left bundle branch block from high-density electroanatomical mapping","volume":"402","author":"Zou","year":"2024","journal-title":"Int J Cardiol"}],"container-title":["Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.frontiersin.org\/articles\/10.3389\/fcvm.2025.1659901\/full","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,11]],"date-time":"2025-11-11T06:32:22Z","timestamp":1762842742000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.frontiersin.org\/articles\/10.3389\/fcvm.2025.1659901\/full"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,11]]},"references-count":16,"alternative-id":["10.3389\/fcvm.2025.1659901"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fcvm.2025.1659901","relation":{},"ISSN":["2297-055X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2297-055X","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,11]]},"article-number":"1659901"}}