{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,30]],"date-time":"2025-07-30T15:58:22Z","timestamp":1753891102090,"version":"3.41.2"},"reference-count":41,"publisher":"Frontiers Media SA","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,11]],"date-time":"2024-12-11T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1733875200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["frontiersin.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Front. Endocrinol."],"abstract":"<jats:sec><jats:title>Background<\/jats:title><jats:p>The blastocyst-stage embryo has been considered more advantageous for increasing the cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) at fresh embryo transfer (ET) compared to the cleavage-stage embryo. However, it remains uncertain whether this advantage extends to specialized subpopulations, such as women with thin endometrium (TE), who are characteristic of impaired endometrial receptivity. Thus, this study aims to evaluate the difference in the CLBR between cleavage-stage and blastocyst-stage embryos at fresh ET specifically in women with TE.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title><jats:p>A retrospective cohort comprising 1089 women from three centers, ranging from September 2017 to January 2022, was established. These women were diagnosed with TE (defined as endometrium thickness &amp;lt;= 8 mm) and underwent their first fresh ET. To create a comparable cohort between the cleavage and blastocyst groups while adjusting for key covariates, the propensity score matching (PSM) method was employed. The primary outcome assessed was the CLBR per woman. Both cohorts underwent Kaplan-Meier analysis, Cox proportional hazard models, cumulative incidence function (CIF) curve analysis, and Fine-Grey competing risk models to ascertain the impact of embryo stage at fresh ET on CLBR. Additionally, a sensitivity analysis was conducted within a subgroup defining thin endometrium as an endometrium thickness (EMT) &amp;lt; 7 mm.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results<\/jats:title><jats:p>In the matched cohort after PSM, the CLBR was comparable between groups (p=0.331). However, the cleavage-stage fresh ET was associated with an elevated risk of low birth weight (LBW) (p=0.005) and small for gestational age (SGA) (p=0.037). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the median number of embryo transfer cycles was 2 in the cleavage group and 3 in the blastocyst group. The CLBR for the cleavage group reached 78.1%, while the blastocyst group reached 60.0% after 5 cycles of embryo transfers (log-rank test, p=0.09). A multivariable Cox proportional hazard model indicated no significant association between the embryo stage at fresh ET and CLBR (HR=0.80, 95% CI=0.60-1.07). The CIF curve and Fine-Grey competing risk models demonstrated similar results. These analyses were repeated in the original cohort before PSM and in the subgroup with EMT &amp;lt; 7 mm, and the results remained robust.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title><jats:p>For TE women receiving fresh ET, the choice between the cleavage-stage embryo and the blastocyst-stage embryo yields comparable CLBR. However, selecting the cleavage-stage embryo is associated with increased risks of LBW and SGA births.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.3389\/fendo.2024.1448138","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,11]],"date-time":"2024-12-11T04:33:51Z","timestamp":1733891631000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/crossmark-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["The embryo stage at fresh ET does not affect the cumulative live birth rate in women with a thin endometrium: a retrospective matched-controlled cohort study"],"prefix":"10.3389","volume":"15","author":[{"given":"Qiao-Song","family":"Han","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Yan-Hua","family":"Chen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Bin","family":"Zhang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Jing-Yan","family":"Song","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Ying","family":"Xu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Heng-Bing","family":"Li","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Zi-Zhen","family":"Guo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Zhen-Gao","family":"Sun","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"1965","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,11]]},"reference":[{"key":"B1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3390\/genes11040376","article-title":"Mother and embryo cross-communication","volume":"11","author":"Idelevich","year":"2020","journal-title":"Genes"},{"key":"B2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"hoab021","DOI":"10.1093\/hropen\/hoab021","article-title":"Cumulative live birth rate after IVF: trend over time and the impact of blastocyst culture and vitrification","author":"Saket","year":"2021","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Open"},{"key":"B3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dead197","article-title":"ART in Europe, 2019: results generated from European registries by ESHRE","volume":"38","author":"Gliozheni","year":"2023","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"B4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dead093.005","article-title":"O-005 The ToF-study - comparing the cumulative live birth rate of blastocyst-stage versus cleavage-stage embryo transfers in good prognosis IVF patients: a multicenter randomized controlled trial","volume":"38","author":"Cornelisse","year":"2023","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"B5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dew219","article-title":"Cumulative live birth rates after fresh and vitrified cleavage-stage versus blastocyst-stage embryo transfer in the first treatment cycle","volume":"31","author":"De Vos","year":"2016","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"B6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deaa186","article-title":"Cumulative live birth rates following blastocyst- versus cleavage-stage embryo transfer in the first complete cycle of IVF: a population-based retrospective cohort study","volume":"35","author":"Cameron","year":"2020","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"B7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/hropen\/hoac031","article-title":"No difference in cumulative live birth rates between cleavage versus blastocyst transfer in patients with four or fewer zygotes: results from a retrospective study","volume":"2022","author":"De Croo","year":"2022","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Open"},{"key":"B8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/MD.0000000000009689","article-title":"Endometrial thickness as a predictor of the reproductive outcomes in fresh and frozen embryo transfer cycles: A retrospective cohort study of 1512 IVF cycles with morphologically good-quality blastocyst","volume":"97","author":"Zhang","year":"2018","journal-title":"Med (Baltimore)"},{"key":"B9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.23750\/abm.v94i3.14437","article-title":"Endometrial thickness and live birth rates after IVF: a systematic review","volume":"94","author":"Moshkalova","year":"2023","journal-title":"Acta BioMed Atenei Parm"},{"key":"B10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"792","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2021.12.025","article-title":"Optimal endometrial thickness in fresh and frozen-thaw in vitro fertilization cycles: an analysis of live birth rates from 96,000 autologous embryo transfers","volume":"117","author":"Mahutte","year":"2022","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"B11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dey281","article-title":"The impact of a thin endometrial lining on fresh and frozen\u2013thaw IVF outcomes: an analysis of over 40 000 embryo transfers","volume":"33","author":"Liu","year":"2018","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"B12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3760\/cma.j.cn101441-20200602-00325","article-title":"Effect of the types of transferred embryo on clinical outcomes of frozen-thawed embryo transfer among patients with thin endometrium","volume":"42","author":"Zhang","year":"2022","journal-title":"Chin J Reprod Contracep"},{"key":"B13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"hoaa034","DOI":"10.1093\/hropen\/hoaa034","article-title":"A stepwise approach to move from a cleavage-stage to a blastocyst-stage transfer policy for all patients in the IVF clinic","author":"De Croo","year":"2020","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Open"},{"key":"B14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/humupd\/dmy044","article-title":"Conventional and modern markers of endometrial receptivity: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"25","author":"Craciunas","year":"2019","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Update"},{"key":"B15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deac258","article-title":"Thin endometrial lining: is it more prevalent in patients utilizing preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disease (PGT-M) and related to prior hormonal contraceptive use","volume":"38","author":"Homminga","year":"2023","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"B16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"620","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.05.036","article-title":"Endometrial pattern, but not endometrial thickness, affects implantation rates in euploid embryo transfers","volume":"104","author":"Gingold","year":"2015","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"B17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/CM9.0000000000002609","article-title":"Chinese Association of Reproductive Medicine. Expert consensus on the morphological evaluation of human cleavage-stage embryos and blastocysts","volume":"136","author":"Li","year":"2023","journal-title":"Chin Med J (Engl)"},{"key":"B18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(99)00311-8","article-title":"Blastocyst culture and transfer: analysis of results and parameters affecting outcome in two in vitro fertilization programs","volume":"72","author":"Schoolcraft","year":"1999","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"B19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2009.09.009","article-title":"International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology (ICMART) and the World Health Organization (WHO) revised glossary of ART terminology, 2009\u2217","volume":"92","author":"Zegers-Hochschild","year":"2009","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"B20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3760\/cma.j.cn112140-20200316-00242","article-title":"Growth standard curves of birth weight, length and head circumference of Chinese newborns of different gestation","volume":"58","year":"2020","journal-title":"Chin J Pediatr"},{"key":"B21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2024.03.003","article-title":"Predictors of success after in vitro fertilization","volume":"121","author":"Shingshetty","year":"2024","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"B22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"dead093-115","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dead093.115","article-title":"O-096 Effect of Day-3 embryo morphology on blastocyst quality and ploidy: a machine-learning model of 34781 embryos","volume":"38","author":"Li\u00f1\u00e1n Tegedor","year":"2023","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"B23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"49","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2019.02.013","article-title":"Management of thin endometrium in assisted reproduction: a clinical practice guideline from the Canadian Fertility and Andrology Society","volume":"39","author":"Liu","year":"2019","journal-title":"Reprod BioMed Online"},{"key":"B24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2022.02.004","article-title":"The mystery of optimal endometrial thickness \u2026 never too thick, but when is thin \u2026 too thin","volume":"117","author":"Buyalos","year":"2022","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"B25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/GCO.0000000000000948","article-title":"Walking on thin endometrium","volume":"36","author":"Ata","year":"2024","journal-title":"Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"B26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2022.05.033","article-title":"Endometrial thickness: How thin is too thin","volume":"118","author":"Jacobs","year":"2022","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"B27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2021.02.041","article-title":"Endometrial thickness is not predictive for live birth after embryo transfer, even without a cutoff","volume":"116","author":"Shakerian","year":"2021","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"B28","article-title":"Blastocyst transfer for all? Higher cumulative live birth chance in a blastocyst-stage transfer policy compared to a cleavage-stage transfer policy","volume":"11","author":"De Croo","year":"2019","journal-title":"Facts Views Vis Obgyn"},{"key":"B29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2007.06.010","article-title":"Cryopreservation of human embryos by vitrification or slow freezing: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"90","author":"Loutradi","year":"2008","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"B30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"CD002118","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD002118.pub5","article-title":"Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology","author":"Glujovsky","year":"2016","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"B31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000001338","article-title":"Twin pregnancy and severe maternal outcomes: the world health organization multicountry survey on maternal and newborn health","volume":"127","author":"Santana","year":"2016","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"B32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/15.8.1856","article-title":"Multiple gestation pregnancy","volume":"15","author":"Workshop Group","year":"2000","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"B33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/hropen\/hoac030","article-title":"Women\u2019s preferences concerning IVF treatment: a discrete choice experiment with particular focus on embryo transfer policy","volume":"2022","author":"Cornelisse","year":"2022","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Open"},{"key":"B34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"324","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2011.11.033","article-title":"Elective single embryo transfer and perinatal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"97","author":"Grady","year":"2012","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"B35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/det460","article-title":"Effect of in vitro culture period on birthweight of singleton newborns","volume":"29","author":"Zhu","year":"2014","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"B36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(23)00354-9","article-title":"Small vulnerable newborns\u2014big potential for impact","volume":"401","author":"Ashorn","year":"2023","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"B37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2019.12.014","article-title":"Endometrial thickness is associated with incidence of small-for-gestational-age infants in fresh in vitro fertilization\u2013intracytoplasmic sperm injection and embryo transfer cycles","volume":"113","author":"Guo","year":"2020","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"B38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"55","DOI":"10.1186\/s12958-023-01105-6","article-title":"Effect of endometrial thickness on obstetric and neonatal outcomes in assisted reproduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"21","author":"Fang","year":"2023","journal-title":"Reprod Biol Endocrinol"},{"key":"B39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2019.12.001","article-title":"Context-based infertility care","volume":"40","author":"Macklon","year":"2020","journal-title":"Reprod BioMed Online"},{"key":"B40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2023.103259","article-title":"A critical appraisal of studies on endometrial thickness and embryo transfer outcome","volume":"47","author":"Mathyk","year":"2023","journal-title":"Reprod BioMed Online"},{"key":"B41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000001709","article-title":"Practice Bulletin No. 169: Multifetal Gestations: Twin, Triplet, and Higher-Order Multifetal Pregnancies","volume":"128","year":"2016","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"}],"container-title":["Frontiers in Endocrinology"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.frontiersin.org\/articles\/10.3389\/fendo.2024.1448138\/full","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,11]],"date-time":"2024-12-11T04:34:04Z","timestamp":1733891644000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.frontiersin.org\/articles\/10.3389\/fendo.2024.1448138\/full"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,11]]},"references-count":41,"alternative-id":["10.3389\/fendo.2024.1448138"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fendo.2024.1448138","relation":{},"ISSN":["1664-2392"],"issn-type":[{"type":"electronic","value":"1664-2392"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,11]]},"article-number":"1448138"}}