{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,30]],"date-time":"2026-10-30T20:26:31Z","timestamp":1793391991828,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":33,"publisher":"Frontiers Media SA","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,11,6]],"date-time":"2024-11-06T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1730851200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/100016079","name":"Science and Technology Department of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100016079","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["frontiersin.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Front. Genet."],"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Introduction<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Karyotyping and chromosome microarray analysis (CMA) are the two main prenatal diagnostic techniques currently used for genetic testing. We aimed to evaluate the value of chromosomal karyotyping and CMA for different prenatal indications.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>A total of 2084 amniocentesis samples from pregnant women who underwent prenatal diagnosis from 16 to 22 + 6\u00a0weeks of gestation between January 2021 and December 2022 were retrospectively collected. The pregnant women were classified according to different prenatal diagnostic indications and underwent CMA and karyotype analysis. Clinical data were collected, and the results of the CMA and karyotype analysis were statistically analyzed to compare the effects of the two diagnostic techniques.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The total detection rate of abnormal chromosomes was significantly higher using CMA than karyotype analysis. The detection rate of abnormal chromosomes using CMA was significantly higher than that using karyotyping for ultrasound abnormalities, high-risk serologic screening, adverse pregnancy history, positive noninvasive prenatal test (NIPT) screening, and ultrasound abnormalities combined with adverse pregnancy history indications. Among the fetuses with inconsistent results between the two testing methods, 144 had an abnormal CMA but a normal karyotype, with the highest percentage of pregnant women with ultrasound abnormalities at 38.89% (56\/144). CMA had the highest detection rate for structural abnormalities combined with soft-index abnormalities among all ultrasound abnormalities. The highest detection rate of copy number variants in the group of structural abnormalities in a single system was in the genitourinary system (3\/29, 10.34%).<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>CMA can improve the detection rate of chromosomal abnormalities in patients with ultrasound abnormalities, high-risk serologic screening, adverse maternal history, positive NIPT screening, and ultrasound abnormalities combined with adverse maternal history and can increase the detection rate of chromosomal abnormalities in karyotypic normality by 6.91% (144\/2,084), this result is higher than similar studies. However, karyotype analysis remains advantageous over CMA regarding balanced chromosomal rearrangement and detection of low-level chimeras, and the combination of the two methods is more helpful in improving the detection rate of prenatal chromosomal abnormalities.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.3389\/fgene.2024.1347942","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,11,6]],"date-time":"2024-11-06T00:08:37Z","timestamp":1730851717000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/crossmark-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":10,"title":["Clinical application of chromosome microarray analysis and karyotyping in prenatal diagnosis in Northwest China"],"prefix":"10.3389","volume":"15","author":[{"given":"ShuYuan","family":"Xue","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"YuTong","family":"Liu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"LiXia","family":"Wang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Le","family":"Zhang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Bozhen","family":"Chang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"GuiFeng","family":"Ding","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"PengGao","family":"Dai","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1965","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,11,6]]},"reference":[{"key":"B1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1374","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000438962.16108.d1","article-title":"Committee opinion no. 581. The use of chromosomal microarray analysis in prenatal diagnosis","volume":"122","year":"2013","journal-title":"Obstet. Gyneco"},{"key":"B2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e48","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000004084","article-title":"Screening for fetal chromosomal abnormalities: acog practice bulletin, number 226","volume":"136","year":"2020","journal-title":"Obstet. Gynecol."},{"key":"B3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"513","DOI":"10.1007\/s00439-011-1095-5","article-title":"Clinical utility of chromosomal microarray analysis in invasive prenatal diagnosis","volume":"131","author":"Armengol","year":"2012","journal-title":"Hum. Genet."},{"key":"B4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e116","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000004410","article-title":"Antepartum fetal surveillance: ACOG practice bulletin, number 229","volume":"137","year":"2021","journal-title":"Obstet. Gynecol."},{"key":"B5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"181","DOI":"10.3390\/jcm13010181","article-title":"Prenatal exome sequencing analysis in fetuses with various ultrasound findings","volume":"13","author":"Borrell","year":"2023","journal-title":"J. Clin. Med."},{"key":"B6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"351","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.3861","article-title":"Prenatal chromosomal microarray analysis in a diagnostic laboratory; experience with >1000 cases and review of the literature","volume":"32","author":"Breman","year":"2012","journal-title":"Prenat. Diagn."},{"key":"B7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1162","DOI":"10.3389\/fgene.2019.01162","article-title":"A retrospective analysis of 10-year data assessed the diagnostic accuracy and efficacy of cytogenomic abnormalities in current prenatal and pediatric settings","volume":"10","author":"Chai","year":"2019","journal-title":"Front. Genet."},{"key":"B8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1038\/s41431-024-01680-1","article-title":"Genomic Balancing Act: deciphering DNA rearrangements in the complex chromosomal aberration involving 5p15.2, 2q31.1, and 18q21.32","author":"Dardas","year":"2024","journal-title":"Eur. J. Hum. Genet."},{"key":"B9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"83","DOI":"10.1038\/nrneph.2017.167","article-title":"Genomic medicine for kidney disease","volume":"14","author":"Groopman","year":"2018","journal-title":"Nat. Rev. Nephrol."},{"key":"B10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"610","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.12464","article-title":"Use of prenatal chromosomal microarray: prospective cohort study and systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"41","author":"Hillman","year":"2013","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol."},{"key":"B11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"680","DOI":"10.1097\/GIM.0b013e3182217a3a","article-title":"American College of Medical Genetics standards and guidelines for interpretation and reporting of postnatal constitutional copy number variants","volume":"13","author":"Kearney","year":"2011","journal-title":"Genet. Med."},{"key":"B12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"22807","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-023-50285-z","article-title":"Combining chromosomal microarray and clinical exome sequencing for genetic diagnosis of intellectual disability","volume":"13","author":"Kim","year":"2023","journal-title":"Sci. Rep."},{"key":"B13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"614","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2012.03279.x","article-title":"Clinical utility of array comparative genomic hybridisation for prenatal diagnosis: a cohort study of 3171 pregnancies","volume":"119","author":"Lee","year":"2012","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"B14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"157","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.5422","article-title":"Are all chromosome microarrays the same? What clinicians need to know","volume":"39","author":"Levy","year":"2019","journal-title":"Prenat. Diagn."},{"key":"B15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"50","DOI":"10.1186\/s13052-019-0635-9","article-title":"Prevalence, types, and malformations in congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract in newborns: a retrospective hospital-based study","volume":"45","author":"Li","year":"2019","journal-title":"J. Pediatr."},{"key":"B16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/bs.ctdb.2022.10.001","article-title":"Gene-environment interactions in birth defect etiology: challenges and opportunities","volume":"152","author":"Lipinski","year":"2023","journal-title":"Curr. Top. Dev. Biol."},{"key":"B17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"225","DOI":"10.1159\/000516655","article-title":"Re: international system for human cytogenetic or cytogenomic nomenclature (ISCN): some thoughts, by T. Liehr","volume":"161","author":"McGowan-Jordan","year":"2020","journal-title":"Cytogenet. Genome Res."},{"key":"B18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"101265","DOI":"10.1016\/j.siny.2021.101265","article-title":"Neonatal encephalopathy: focus on epidemiology and underexplored aspects of etiology","volume":"26","author":"McIntyre","year":"2021","journal-title":"Semin. Fetal Neonatal Med."},{"key":"B19","article-title":"17q12 recurrent duplication","volume-title":"GeneReviews\u00ae","author":"Mefford","year":"2016"},{"key":"B20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"267","DOI":"10.1097\/GIM.0b013e31816b64c2","article-title":"Microduplications of 22q11.2 are frequently inherited and are associated with variable phenotypes","volume":"10","author":"Ou","year":"2008","journal-title":"Genet. Med."},{"key":"B21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"245","DOI":"10.1038\/s41436-019-0686-8","article-title":"Technical standards for the interpretation and reporting of constitutional copy-number variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (acmg) and the clinical genome resource (clingen)","volume":"22","author":"Riggs","year":"2020","journal-title":"Genet. Med."},{"key":"B22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2230","DOI":"10.1038\/s41436-021-01150-9","article-title":"Correction: technical standards for the interpretation and reporting of constitutional copy-number variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (acmg) and the clinical genome resource (clingen)","volume":"23","author":"Riggs","year":"2021","journal-title":"Genet. Med."},{"key":"B23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"379","DOI":"10.1111\/cge.13810","article-title":"Chromosome microarray analysis should be offered to all invasive prenatal diagnostic testing following a normal rapid aneuploidy test result","volume":"98","author":"Rodriguez-Revenga","year":"2020","journal-title":"Clin. Genet."},{"key":"B24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"976","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.3945","article-title":"Experience with microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization for prenatal diagnosis in over 5000 pregnancies","volume":"32","author":"Shaffer","year":"2012","journal-title":"Prenat. Diagn."},{"key":"B25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"10","DOI":"10.1038\/s41525-023-00353-0","article-title":"Diagnostic yield of pediatric and prenatal exome sequencing in a diverse population","volume":"8","author":"Slavotinek","year":"2023","journal-title":"NPJ Genom. Med."},{"key":"B26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"445","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.17533","article-title":"Frequency of submicroscopic chromosomal aberrations in pregnancies without increased risk for structural chromosomal aberrations: systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"51","author":"Srebniak","year":"2018","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol."},{"key":"B27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"226","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.23702","article-title":"Association of prenatal renal ultrasound abnormalities with pathogenic copy number variants in a large Chinese cohort","volume":"59","author":"Su","year":"2022","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol."},{"key":"B28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"319","DOI":"10.1002\/humu.22742","article-title":"Benefits and burdens of using a snp array in pregnancies at increased risk for the common aneuploidies","volume":"36","author":"Van Opstal","year":"2015","journal-title":"Hum. Mutat."},{"key":"B29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2175","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1203382","article-title":"Chromosomal microarray versus karyotyping for prenatal diagnosis","volume":"367","author":"Wapner","year":"2012","journal-title":"N. Engl. J. Med."},{"key":"B30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"496","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-021-03918-y","article-title":"Investigation on combined copy number variation sequencing and cytogenetic karyotyping for prenatal diagnosis","volume":"21","author":"Zhang","year":"2021","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"key":"B31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"358","DOI":"10.1111\/jcmm.16080","article-title":"Chromosomal mosaicism detected by karyotyping and chromosomal microarray analysis in prenatal diagnosis","volume":"25","author":"Zhang","year":"2021","journal-title":"J. Cell. Mol. Med."},{"key":"B32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1370","DOI":"10.11817\/j.issn.1672-7347.2021.210412","article-title":"Prenatal ultrasound features and genetic analysis for 17q12 microdeletion syndrome","volume":"46","author":"Zhang","year":"2021","journal-title":"Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban."},{"key":"B33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"459","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.22021","article-title":"Clinical utility of expanded non-invasive prenatal screening and chromosomal microarray analysis in high-risk pregnancy","volume":"57","author":"Zhu","year":"2021","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol."}],"container-title":["Frontiers in Genetics"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.frontiersin.org\/articles\/10.3389\/fgene.2024.1347942\/full","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,11,6]],"date-time":"2024-11-06T00:08:40Z","timestamp":1730851720000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.frontiersin.org\/articles\/10.3389\/fgene.2024.1347942\/full"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,11,6]]},"references-count":33,"alternative-id":["10.3389\/fgene.2024.1347942"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fgene.2024.1347942","relation":{},"ISSN":["1664-8021"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1664-8021","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,11,6]]},"article-number":"1347942"}}